Institutional Presentation - June / 2015 - Ser Educacional
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Disclaimer This material reflects management’s expectations and may contain estimates related to future events. Any information, data, forecasts or future plans herein refer to estimates, and therefore can not be taken as concrete evidence or a promise to the market. Ser Educacional is not responsible for investment operations or decisions taken based on the information herein. These estimates are subject to change without prior notice. This material has been prepared by Ser Educacional S.A. (“Ser Educacional" or the “Company”) in accordance with the highest national and international standards, and it includes certain forward-looking statements that are primarily based on Ser Educacional’s current expectations and projections of future events and financial trends that currently affect or may affect the Company’s business, and therefore they are not guarantees of future performance. They are based on management’s expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could lead the Company’s financial situation and operating results to differ materially from those expressed in Ser Educacional’s forward-looking statements. Ser Educacional assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. This material is disclosed solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as a request or an offer to buy or sell any shares or related financial instruments. Accordingly, this presentation is not a recommendation of investment and should not be considered as such. It is not related to specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any recipient, neither does it make a statement or provide a guarantee, either express or implied, related to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information herein. This presentation should not be regarded as a substitute to the recipients’ judgment. Any opinion expressed herein is subject to change without prior notice and Ser Educacional does not assume the obligation to update or revise them. 2
Agenda Ser Educacional Profile 1 Competitive Advantages 2 Multiple Growth Opportunities 3 Successful Track Record 4 Brazilian Undergraduate Education Industry 5 Attachments 6 3
One of Brazil’s Largest Private Education Groups and Leader in the Northeast and North Regions Compounded Average Growth Rate:45% Net Revenue R$MM Leader in number of enrolled students in the NE and NO Regions with growth above the Brazilian average 163,000 enrolled students 35 Campi in 24 cities and 12 states 820 705 456 Leading Brands: UNINASSAU, UNAMA and UnG 184 283 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015(LTM) Value Proposition to Students Quality education, infrastructure and standardized processes Above Market Average Operating Margin Adjusted EBITDA R$MM Low Financial Leverage 1Q15: Net Debt of R$246.3mm (0.85x LTM EBITDA) 289.6 248 Track record of success in M&A 29.6% 30.9% 33.8% 35.3% 20 acquisitions in 12 years 154 88 35.1% 54 Listed in IBRX-100 ADTV 3M > R$10mm | Free float 30% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015(LTM) EBITDA Ajusted R$MM EBITDA Margin % 5
12 Years of Consistency: Organic Growth + M&A + Strategic and Financial Discipline Foundation and first growth Professionalization and Consolidation and New growth cycle phase model improvement second growth phase Inauguration of units in Fortaleza, Mercês and Acquisition of FABAC, Acquisition of FASE Caruaru ESAMC and CDF College Accreditation as a university Acquisition of FAL Cartesian Group investment center Acquisition of Unama/FIT Foundation of Implementation of BoD Acquisition of units in Manaus Acquisition of UNG Maurício de Inauguration of Joaquim and São Luís Nassau College Nabuco College in Recife 2003 2007 2008 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 - 2020 IPO EAD Inauguration of João Acquisition of 3 units in Piauí Pessoa and Campina Acquisition of M&A Grande units units in Belém Acquisition of Organic Growth and Aracaju Decisão College and Inauguration of Geographical Vitória da Conquista Unit Joaquim Nabuco Expansion College in Paulista Permission to operate in the Distance Learning market Maintenance in Rio Local Player Regional Player National Player 6
Solid Fundamentals that Allow Growth and Profitability Leader in the North and Northeast - the fastest growing regions in Brazil 1 Differentiated value proposition to the student 2 High scalability, reproducibility and standardization 3 Ability to identify and seize opportunities 4 Solid corporate governance and corporate management 5 8
1 Leadership in the Northeast and North | Solid Student Base, Strong and Recognized Brands in their Regions 135,600 Undergraduate Students: 35 Units 1 University Centers, 2 Universities in 12 states and 24 cities Most Recognized Brands** Cities in operation- 2014 North Northeast City Ranking Amazonas* Pará* Maranhão Piauí Ceará Recife 1 Students: 984 Students: 23.411 Students: 597 Students: 8.576 Students: 6.544 Units: 1 Units: 6 Units: 1 Units: 3 Units: 1 João Pessoa 1 R. G. do Norte Northeast Students: 5.069 Fortaleza 2 Units: 1 Paraíba Maceió 1 Students:16.548 Natal 2 Units: 2 Bahia Pernambuco Teresina 2 Southeast Students: 6.678 São Paulo** Students:39.129 1 NO Belém Units: 3 Units: 10 Students: 19.675 Sergipe SE Units: 5 Alagoas Guarulhos 1 Students: 1.393 Students: 7.018 Units: 1 Units: 1 9
North and Northeast | Market Penetration Still Low 2013 Undergraduate Penetration Students by Region x Score > 450 in ENEM thousand Number of enrollments / Population aged between 18 and 24 2013 Undergraduate freshmen from Public and Private institutions ENEM 2013 Region Freshmen - Public Freshmen - Private Students > % of Base > Total Institutions Institutions 450 450 Northeast 10.6% North 45.8 157.9 203.7 238.5 85% Northeast 140.5 373.8 514.3 812.5 63% North Southeast 185.0 1,129.1 1,314.1 1,166.3 113% 10.4% South 110.0 320.6 430.6 393.7 109% Midwest 50.5 229.7 280.2 226.7 124% Midwest Total 531.8 2,211.1 2,743.0 2,837.7 97% 19.7% Enrollment growth Undergraduate students in Brazil: 7.3 million - 2014 Private On-Campus Undergraduates 2003-2013 Southeast 133% 45% North 5% Southeast 16.1% South 100% 28% 88% 18.6% 74% 75% Northeast 19% Number of post- People within the Midwest 10% secondary post-secondary age South 21% students range South Southeast Midwest Northeast North Source: MEC/INEP, IBGE, Hoper, Anuário Valor Econômico, Microdados and McKinsey 10
2 Differentiated Value Proposition to the Student Focus on Great cost-benefit to the Academic quality Good infrastructure Standardized processes Employability student What matters for the sudent? 1- Location: 21.6% 2- Quality: 20.4% 3. Market recognition: 10 % 4 Infrastructure: 8.4% Source: hoper Brands Recognized by the Labor Market 11
2 Quality Teaching 89% of Units with IGC Equal or Above 3 (2013) | includes UNAMA and UnG High Student Satisfaction and Labor Market Recognition (2013/14) IGC2 IGC4 5% 11% Are currently employed or intern 66% believe that the image of the institution in society , very good or excellent 86% Are satisfied with their courses 96% Recognize the qualification of teachers 92% consider that the knowledge acquired in their courses suit your professional needs 91% IGC3 84% IGC by Brand 95% of all Courses have CPC above 3 (2013) – Including UNAMA and UnG CPC2 CPC4 8% 10% 7% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 13% Nassau Nabuco Unama FIT UnG IGC2 IGC3 IGC4 CPC3 82% 12
3 Well Located Units and Infrastructure Dedicated to Education Strategic location of Units Infrastructure Focused on Education Air-conditioned rooms Comprehensive Specialized Distance Learning including Multimedia collections laboratories Wide Spaces Sports Arenas Auditoriums Studios Benefits of Location 1 Primordial for the student 2- Impact on perception of value 3- Reduction of transportation cost 4 Convenience Clinics Modern Equipment Accessibility Wifi 5- Facilitates marketing actions
3 Scalability, Repeatability and Standardization Learning Center Student Service Business Management Student Relationship Service Sharing Unified syllabus Center (SRA) Center (CSC) Electronic attendance Integrated Processes Control by indicators ledger Academic auditing Self-service and online access Service Level Agreements Standard systems, Standardized tests procedures, and Support for future growth proceces :ISO 9001 14
4 Ability to Identify and Seize Opportunities Knowledge of legislation and regulating agencies Mercado de trabalho Founder and controlling shareholder has been presiding the Agility in offering Brazilian Association of Colleges (Abrafi) for 8 years, and acts Courses offering according to Pronatec`s vocational as vice president of the Brazilian Association of Sponsors of the demands of the labor courses Higher Education (Abmes) market : focus on employability One of the leaders in vocational course Strong track record in quickly obtaining authorization for new segment courses (anticipation of trends) Standardization and investments in technology Periodical market surveys in all cities where the group allow scalability and fine-tune operates – allows the Company to anticipate demands the provision of courses , according to each unit needs Active board of directors with independent members 15
5 Solid Corporate Governance and Business Management Valor Econômico Newspaper Ranking 2014 (based on 9M14) Education Industry Recognition in 2014 2 Independent Board Members Minimum dividend distribution of EBITDA Margin 1 25% of net income 1- Company of the year - middle market, Isto é Dinheiro magazine Directors with solid business and 2- Financial performance Net Income / 1 financial markets Proactive and well recognized by Valor Econômico Shareholders` Equity experience Dividend aligned newspaper board of directors Policy 3- Brands I Like - Recife Net Margin 1 Current ratio 3 Proactive committees 100% tag-along High level listing Auditing and Finance and Fiscal Council ADTV above R$10mm and listed in IBRX-100 HR and Corporate Governance Adherent to BM&Fbovespa Novo Mercado regulation Fiscal Council 16
UNAMA – Universidade da Amazônia Campus BR– Belém / Pará, Brazil 3 Multiple Growth Opportunities 17
Ser Educacional | from Regional to National Drivers Expansion of Students and Revenue Base Result Maximization Drivers Recent Organic Growth Distance Learning Acquisitions Geographical NO/NE/SE Development Synergies Expansion Academic Quality Portfolio Increase High profitability Implement SER Expansion of courses: more potential model in recent existing brands in attractive acquisitions their operating Business organic regions and 25 new units by development Capture cost and neighboring 2017/18 revenue synergies Technology and High potential for Standardization Opportunistic Two new University profitability Expand student acquisitions Centers pending in base Partnership with MEC Distance Pearson fully learning Pronatec operational Financial Learning Discipline Proven experience in Institutions “Profitability existing courses Leader” 18
2014: Recent Acquisitions and Organic Growth +32,000 on-campus students Faculdade Mauricio Opening (M&A) de Nassau Location Manaus / AM Location Belém / Santarem (PA) Units 1 Initiation of enrollment in new Students 12,200 Purpose Consolidation - North units in 2015 Units 4 Faculdade Mauricio Price R$151.2 million Opening de Nassau +2,000 distance learning students Date October 2014 Location São Luiz / MA (Dec/14) Purpose Consolidation - North Units 1 Purpose Consolidation - NE Opening Distance Learning Location Northeast Region Total: +34,000 students Centers 9 Date January 2014 Purpose New businesses Acquisition FAL / FASE São Lourenço da Mata Location e Olinda (PE) Dilution of CSC/CRA costs Students 1850 Location Guarulhos (SP) Units 2 Students 17,000 Price R$11.1 million Purpose Consolidation - NE Expansion of the student base via Units 5 the SER model Maintenance Bennett Price R$199.1 million Location Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Purpose Entry to SE / São Paulo Synergies from the acquisitions Price R$10 million estimated at R$50 million in 5 years Entry to SE / Rio de Purpose On-Campus Janeiro Distance Learning 19
Recent Acquisitions| Strategic Checklist Strategic Strategic Checklist Benefits 1 Leadership in its region 2 Brand recognized by students and labor market Accelerate consolidation in the North 3 Good academic indicators (igc >3) 4 High potential for generating synergies Cost Dilution CSC/CRA 5 Low exposure to FIES 1ª Private Dominant in Solid presence in University in the Guarulhos, 2nd Santarem (Pará / Brazil) 6 Individual strategic benefits: North largest city in the state of SP Dominant in Belém/PA 45 years of Kick-off operations Regional – National Transition 20
Integration of Recent Acquisitions will Create a New Wave of “SER Impact" Integration Roadmap Back office Creation of new migration Shared courses and Syllabus Physical structure Geographic Services and pricing/vacancy unification improvement Expansion Student revaluation Relationship Centers Completed Under execution Benefits Affected After Integration Intelligent portfolio Standardization and management courses Efficient Value proposition SER Impact process automation management of and commercial to the student physical spaces Student base expansion excellence Increase operational margins Long Distance in the In acquired units Intensive use of technology Large, multimedia , classroom / Pronatec e Course Employability air-conditioned classrooms Student satisfaction Mix Quality improvement Active pricing and Maximize number of Geographical expansion and cost reduction sales channel management Quality at a fair price classrooms per unit 21
Distance Learning Development - EAD Strategic location of Units New Initiatives 2.5 thousand students in 9 learning centers Graduation Courses Distance learning graduation: 15 courses Intake of 1.6 thousand students in 1Q15 25 Learning centers in the North, Northeast and Southeast regions 100% online model Expansion to On-Campus Undergraduation Partnership with Offering 20% of the workload from 2 to 13 disciplines Capacity to reach 18,000 students Strong brand and similar syllabus 22 compared to on-campus model + brand awareness and cost synergies
UNG –Guarulhos University Campus Downtown – Guarulhos/São Paulo, Brazil 4 Successful Track Record 23
Student Base & Breakdown Student Base (thousands) Student Profile 87% of the FIES student base scored more than 450 points 29% of Grupo SER`s student base has FIES financing 35% of Grupo SER`s on-campus undergraduate student base has FIES financing Student Base 1Q15 Graduation 5% 163 Vocational 128.5 10% Distance 98.8 Learning 2% 56.7 40.8 32.9 23 24.7 0.5 8.4 13.1 2003 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1T15 Undergradu ation 83%
Net Revenue Annual Net Revenue (R$ million) Quarterly Net Revenue (R$ million) 705 269.5 457 204 176 171 154 283 125 107 114 112 184 141 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 25
Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted EBITDA (R$ million) – unaudited pro forma Unama and UnG Quarterly Adjusted EBITDA (R$ million) 37.1% 35.1% 33.8% 30.9% 29.6% 104.6 247.8 62.7 65.4 64.9 44.7% 54.8 40.6% 38.8% 154.5 47.8 37.2% 38.0% 33.6% 33.2% 38.2 37.0 31.4 25.2% 26.9% 87.6 52.4 54.2 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 Adjusted EBITDA EBITDA Margin 26
Cost of Services and General and Administrative Expenses Cost of Services Rendered (ex.depreciation/amortiz.) Annual (R$ million) Cost of Services Rendered (ex depreciation/amortiz.) Quarterly (R$ million) 257.1 173.1 37.5% 34.0% 95.7 37.9% 84.1 34.3% 36.5% 97.3 43.3 42.5 53.3 61.6 59.4 68.8 51.9 42.8% 41.3% 48 38.1% 38.1% 35.1% 34.7% 35.5% 33.6% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 Cost of Services Cost of Services / Net Revenue Cost of Services Cost of Services / Net Revenue Annual SG&A (ex depreciation/amortiz.) (R$ million) Quarterly SG&A (ex depreciation/amortiz.) (R$ million) 185.9 122.6 90.6 65.1 57.9 58.9 45.4 44.6 38.4 38.0 32.0% 26.8% 26.4% 30.5 29.5 39.0 24.2 26.8% 26.4% 30.6% 28.4% 27.6% 32.1% 22.6% 24.6% 25.9% 26.1% 24.2% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 SG&A SG&A / Net Revenue SG&A SG&A / Net Revenue 27
Net Income & Net Margin Annual Net Income (R$ million) Quarterly Net Income (R$ million) 213.9 82.8 116.3 58.7 57.7 53.7 43.8 39.8 64.3 29.1 26.0 37.1% 21.5 38.0% 35.7 31.6 30.6% 33.7% 30.7% 30.3% 25.6% 25.3% 22.7% 25.5% 23.3% 21.5% 17.2% 17.3% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 Net Income Net Margin Net Income Net Margin 28
Accounts Receivable Turnover 148 151 116 119 109 113 110 135 98 98 93 111 93 81 105 71 86 100 76 80 67 57 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 Average Term Average Term (FIES) Normalized Average Term Federal Government payment of R$58.8mm in may/15: R$ 52.8mm FIES (dec/14) and R$6mm PRONATEC (jan/15) 29
Cash and Debt (R$MM) Gross Debt Cash Flow Evolution 4Q14 x 1Q15 Short Term Long Term Commitments $108.8 173.7 127.5 65.8 $136.7 19.7 $105.5 104,5* $38.1 90 74.7 $18.7 $45.7 $62.5 $5.1 $7.4 17.8 33.3 Cash + Operating Accounts Capex Acquisitions Loans and Debt Dividends Cash and 4Q14 1Q15 Investments Activities receivable Financing Amortization paid Equivalents 4Q14 variation 1Q15 Net Debt Debt Amortization Schedule Net Debt Debt Net Debt / EBITDA (LTM) 246.3 Acquisitions 187.5* 105.1 0.65x 0.85 187.5* 70.0 56.3 0.65x 49.2 40.3 37 29.5 31.1 25.3 0.15 23.3 35.1 26.7 21.4 10.0 23.9 17.1 9.7 10.0 4Q14 1Q15 *Federal Government payment of R$58.8mm in may/15: R$ 52.8mm FIES (dec/14) and R$6mm PRONATEC (jan/15) Short Term 2016 2017 2018 2019 after 2020 30
Investments (Capex) Historical Capex (R$ million) 1Q15 Capex BreakdownR$100.5MM 295.6 Software Licenses 2% Equipment / Library / IT 18% 134.3 142.8 36.4 Acquisitions 119.5 62% 82.1 17.1 64.4 2.1 6.9 Property acquisition / 63.3 2.2 construction / 49.7 124.9 renovations 2.5 95.5 2.7 77.8 78.4 18% 60.8 47.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Approved for 2015 Fixed Assets Intangíble Assets Acquisition of Subsidiaries 31
UNAMA and UnG Pro Forma Results 32
2015.1 Intake and Ordinances/SISFIES Limitations Status 2015.1 Intake Measures | Ordinances and SISFIES Limitations Students (thousands) 1Q15 1Q14** %∆ Measures Impact or Sensitivity Analysis Initiatives 87% of SER Group’s 2014 student base Creation of private student loans as an had scores of more than 450 points alternative to FIES: Undergraduate Intake 45.6 37.5 21.8% Limit of 450 Points 4.8% of 2H14 enrollments had scores of less than 450 points Financing of up to 100% of tuition (Ordinance 21) (expectation: of 50% on average) Organic Growth 28.2 28.0 +0.7% 42.7% of undergraduate students have FIES agreements Tuition divided into two installments On-Campus 26.6 27.3 -2.5% Change in 2015 and the student begins paying a Payment Flows smaller amount during the course Increase in average receivable days (Ordinance Ser Educacional subsidy: students Distance Learning 1.6 0.7 119.2% 23/14 and 2/15) will pay only 3.4% p.a. Unama / FIT 10.9 3.5* 208.9% Price Negotiation of new partnerships with private Increase Limit Tuition average increase of 7% banks and repositioning of EDUCRED (Ser’s of 6.41% own financing line) UnG 6.5 5.9* 10.4% Dropouts 1Q15 FIES effect in 1Q15 Intake Graduation 1.1 2.0 -46.5% 12.1% • 9,700 new FIES students in the quarter 10.8% Vocational 0 0 0% • FIES funnel still has 600 contracts on completion status • Of the 12,800 students who signed contractual amendments, 5,500 were able to enter the FIES contract funnel * Intake made by previous shareholders 1Q14 1Q15 **Proforma
Key Messages in this Roadshow 1 Ser Educacional still shows solid fundamentals 2 Recent developments to bring more strength to the Company (Expansion in the Southeast, Fiscal Council and new Vice President) 3 Low Market penetration is still the main growth driver 4 FIES uncertainties/reductions will require more attention to avoid dropout risks and bad debt in 2015 5 Opportunity to Ser Educacional to be stronger in the long term 34
Uninassau Aracaju/Sergipe, Brazil 4 Brazilian Education Industry 35
Trends and Demand Drivers in the Brazilian Undergraduation Industry Trends and Demand Drivers Private Undergraduate Market Share #students - 2013 • Convenience, affordability, and quality are likely to raise the number of enrollments in distance-learning courses 10 largest • Growth in Fies, 39% • Higher purchasing Other Distance learning ProUni, and Pronatec institutions power and low student financing 61% penetration of post- programs reshaping secondary education in Principais the sector in Brazil Brazil help increase determinantes da future demand in the demanda • Demand stimulation sector Kroton+Anhanguera, Estácio, Unip, Laureate, Uninove, Unicsul, Ânima, Ser Educacional, Whitney, Devry e Grupo Tiradentes-Unit • Capitalized groups should prevail Undergraduate students evolution • Increasing importance of 2,391 Tendências 2,378 strong and recognized 2,270 do setor brands • Students less sensitive to 1,859 prices • Market still very widespread • Changes to decision and with room for based on quality consolidation 1,097 • Courses designed to meet the requirements of the labor market 1999 2003 2006 2010 2013 Source: Valor Econômico Education Yearbook, MEC/INEP Database, Post-secondary education synopsis, 2013: includes Universities, University Centers, Integrated Colleges, Colleges, institutes, Vocational centers and CEFETIFET 36
Brazilian Post-Secondary Education Sector Undergraduate Student Base (million) College Penetration Rate (net)* Public Private Addressable market: 35mm students 33% 6,9 7,3 - 23.3mm inhabitants between18-24 years 6,6 5,3 old 5,0 5,0 4.9 5.1 5.4 15% 3.8 3.7 3.9 - 12.2 mm inhabitants between 24-35 years old without full undergraduate course 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.9 19.7% 18.6% 16.1% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Rules to access FIES 10.4% 10.6% Undergraduation Penetration 2013 Institutions 95% Courses must be on-campus IGC igual or above 3 North Northeast Southeast South Midwest 76% 71% 59% 59% Hold a debt clearance certificate (CND) Rate by region Brazil`s average National education rate plan target 34% Students 28% Approval note and minimum frequency 450 points in ENEM (as of apr/15) Average income by education level R$50/quarter – effective interest rate: 3.5% p.a. Workers as a % of total USA Russia Argentina United Chile Mexico Brazil Kingdom FIES Funding Criteria FIES Student Base (million) 0% 0% 5% % of wallet committed % financed 6% 10% 4% 8% 9% 6% 19% Private Penetration 1,660 Family income below 10 minimum wages 13% 14% = or greater than 60% 100% 48% 34% 48% 20% 1,150 Between 40% and 60% 75% 35% Between 20% and 40% 50% 23% 631 Family income between 10 and 15 minimum wages 44% 38% 40% 28% Higher than 40% 75% 16% 295 9% 16% 9% 8% 7% 217 172 190 Between 20% and 40% 50% 4% 3% 4% 4% Family income between 15 and 20 minimum wages Basic Secondary Undergraduate Master Doctorade Higher than 20% 50% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 up to 1.5 1.51 to 4 4.01 to 10 Source: MEC/INEP, IBGE, Hoper, Anuário Valor Econômico e UNESCO | Special thanks to Bank of America Merrill Lynch research team 10.1 to 15 15.01 to 20 more than 20
FIES | Evolution and Comparables FIES Contracts Evolution Comparable Spending per Student per year 1,712,960 1,131,001 585,503 44.200 74,196 222,871 39.100 38.900 591.959 545.498 32.800 324,200 21.800 362.632 282,107 187,939 4.700 148.675 1.700 263,391 257,759 74.196 102,845 174,693 71,676 45,830 Unicamp USP UnB UFRJ UFSCAR FIES PROUNI 2,520 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 BB CEF Acumulado FIES Annual Expense as a % of total investment in education Total FIES student debt as a % of GDP 3,5% em 2029 5% em 2016 Fonte:, Credit Suisse e Itaú 38
Contact Jânyo Diniz CEO Nazareno Habib Bichara CFO Rodrigo Alves IR Officer Geraldo Soares IR Manager Tel.: (5511) 2769 3223 E-mail: ri@sereducacional.com Website: www.sereducacional.com/ir 39e 39
Faculdade Joaquim Nabuco Campus Recife/PE 6 Attachments 40
Uninassau marketing materials / Sports Sponsorship Intake Marketing Campaigns Sports Sponsorship Programs 41
Ser Educacional Events and Congresses 42
You can also read