IHPnews 622: Crunchtime? - International Health Policies
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
IHP news 622 : Crunch time ? ( 21 May 2021) The weekly International Health Policies (IHP) newsletter is an initiative of the Health Policy unit at the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, Belgium. Dear Colleagues, As an evidence-based believer in synchronicity, I doubt it was just a coincidence that I got my (first) jab on World Hypertension Day . I didn’t have a bittersweet feeling, like dr. Tedros last week when he got his, I just hope all 7 billion people (or at least the adults among them) get this jab (x2) sooner rather than later. From that angle, it’s good to see that the pressure on G7 countries to share excess doses is at last steadily increasing, both from UNICEF & WHO this week. Sharing doses is long overdue and nowhere near enough, though. Tedros said the world has now effectively reached a stage of ‘vaccine apartheid’, while calling on vaccine makers to make up the (Covax) gap. Not for the first time, he didn’t mince words: “trickle down vaccination is not an effective strategy for fighting a deadly respiratory virus". Neither is the trickle down “global solidarity” we’ve mostly seen so far. Worse, our wonderful “winner takes all” global economic system has sparked a bunch of new vaccine billionaires, as the People’s Vaccine Coalition flagged, ahead of the G20 Global Health Summit in Rome: “Pharma monopoly logic: can create billionaires, can't vaccinate billions of people.” Today’s Global Health summit should at least bring some progress (although our hopes shouldn’t be too high, it appears), while a full-blown multilateral effort led by the Biden administration can probably be expected in the coming weeks, by the G7 summit in the UK in June. (let’s hope it won’t be ‘for “democracies” only’). At least on the need for (boosting) manufacturing (capacity) in all regions, everybody increasingly agrees - if not for this pandemic, then for the next. On Tuesday, Emmanuel Macron chaired a summit on post-pandemic recovery in sub-Saharan Africa, launching a multibillion-dollar “New Deal” for the continent. You don’t have to teach Jupiter how to communicate. Accelerating vaccination on the continent was also high on the agenda, as you can imagine. On the conceptual & paradigmatic front, we’d like to flag the concept Health Systems for Health Security, increasingly in vogue. A WHO/University of Leeds workshop was dedicated to it on Thursday. A number of possible paradigm shifts could also be looming on the horizon in the slipstream of the Covid pandemic, at least if we dare to hope. For the first one, see Gregg Gonsalves’ tweets of last weekend, commenting on increasingly critical coverage on Bill Gates in a number of areas (among others, re IP/global vaccine equity & Bill’s oversized role in global health governance) : “So many people, institutions in global health are in hock to industry or Gates or both. They have constrained the possibilities in global health along the contours of the market, so that private gain takes precedence over public good. May #COVID19 crack open a new world of hope.” “….The philanthropy-capitalist model of public health/global health
hems in policies and programs along the contours of the market, puts private gain over public good. Always. It's time for a change. ” Agree . A FT op-ed, by Ayoade Alakija, co-chair of the Africa Vaccine Delivery Alliance, pointed to another paradigm shift - Pandemic gives Africa a chance to free itself from aid dependency. Hope so too . Finally, in an “Inside Geneva” podcast, looking ahead to the 74th World Health Assembly, Suerie Moon (Graduate Institute) indicated that IP waivers could, and probably should, be the foundation for a new “social contract” during global health crises, especially when, as with Covid- 19, governments ( and thus taxpayers) have shouldered the financial risk of developing the vaccines. She considered the changed US position as a signal of a shifting social contract in this respect, that needs to be renegotiated. Do inform Ursula, Charles, Boris & Angela, Suerie! More in general, top of the agenda at the WHA will be learning lessons from the pandemic (if not now, then when ?) or as Suerie put it: “What do we need to do to fix a broken system? That Covid has shown over and over again is not functioning?”. She called the Covid pandemic ‘a reckoning’ at both national and global levels. Among others, the ‘pandemic treaty’ discussions might get a fair amount of attention. As well as a zillion other issues. PS: as for Saturday evening’s Eurovision 2021 ’s “reckoning”, let’s wait & see. I’ll make sure I have some crunch food . Enjoy your reading. Kristof Decoster Featured Article Failing humanity: looking back on the week, remembering the past Werner Soors (former ITM staff member) What a week this was. In case I wouldn’t have noticed, on Friday 14th the mayor of the privileged town I live in (Antwerp) warned against “the identification of young Muslims, 14-15-16 years old, with a certain frustration - youngsters who now receive those images, unfiltered through social media and with one-sided interpretation”. I didn’t feel addressed. After all, I’m 65. He was referring of course to what was happening in the Gaza strip, and the possibility that the conflict would be exported to the banks of the river Scheldt. Saturday 15th. No need to be a Muslim to have a good morning coffee at Lari Chikh in my Antwerp- North neighbourhood. No usual Berber jokes about King Mohammed VI today. This is Nakba day,
day of Palestinian mourning since 1948. We’re all watching the Israeli bombing of the Gaza strip on TV, mouth open, in painful silence. Sunday 16th. My favourite procrastination day. After contemplating missed deadlines, I dwell through the weekend edition of this country’s self-declared quality newspaper. On the last page, a reflection on the Palestine-Israel crisis under the heading ‘The echo of Hannah Arendt’. Poor Hannah. She once really believed in utopian Zionism, then became overtly critical, and has since been vilified by her kindred (with the exception of Albert Einstein, of course, who also wisely enough refused to become president of Israel). Monday 17th. In the Netherlands, Queen Máxima turns 50 and there is no way to escape that in the Low Countries. These days, anything goes to distract from the real news, even the daughter of a man actively involved in the ‘dirty war’ of the Argentinean military junta. And oh yes, Máxima gave a reading of a poem by Pablo Neruda. Aw. Tuesday 18th. Kristof asks me if my editorial will be ready by tomorrow. I say yes (another deadline). Good Latin American friends write me not to forget that Tupac Amaru and Micaela Bastidas were gruesomely executed by the Spanish occupants of their homeland, 240 years ago. Long dead, they have inspired indigenous resistance and anti-colonial movements ever since. Maybe I could write something about colonialism? Wednesday 19th. Quote from an opinion piece in ‘De Standaard’ by 100 Belgian doctors (I co-signed, no cause for congratulation): “a conflict in which the vast majority of victims fall on one side is not an operation of war. It is slaughter”. The killing in Gaza goes on. The European Union, minus Hungary, calls in vain for a ceasefire. I am on Facebook, reading a post from Gaza-born friend and colleague Majdi Ashour: “This time, from now on, our voices must rise above the voice of battle (…) Salute to the voices that rise above the sound of the battle, and to end this battle that targets the bodies, the right to self-determination and the resistance of our people”. Majdi worked many years for the United Nations Relief and Work Agency (UNRWA) in Gaza City. Is he safe? I haven’t seen him for a long time, so I call him. He’s in the UK, as a political refugee, yearning to be home. His voice is soft and gentle as he explains to me that even ‘battle’ is not the correct term for what is going on: “it’s a battering, with the intent to exterminate”. I’m afraid he’s right. In 1944, Hannah Arendt concluded her essay ‘A hidden tradition’ with this sentence: “only when a people lives and functions in consort with other peoples can it contribute to the establishment upon earth of a commonly conditioned and commonly controlled humanity”. What we witness now – something that comes dangerously close to ethnic cleansing - is failing humanity, and we all have blood on our hands. We should raise our voice too. Highlights of the week World Hypertension Day (17 May) Via the Respond newsletter : “This day has been initiated by The World Hypertension League (WHL), a non-profit, non- governmental organisation with 80 national hypertension societies as members, to increase the awareness of hypertension and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This year’s theme is "Measure
Your Blood Pressure Accurately, Control It, Live Longer", with a particular focus on increasing awareness of hypertension, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This date coincides with May Measurement Month (MMM) another initiative led by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and endorsed by the World Hypertension League (WHL), which consists of the global blood pressure (BP) screening campaign, which in 2019 saw 1.5m people participating….” G20 Global Health Summit (Rome, 21 May) Today’s summit [will] include G-20 members along with Spain, Singapore and the Netherlands as guests; leaders of WHO and other related UN agencies, as well as global health actors such as Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, the Global Fund and CEPI, which has been investing in key aspects of COVID vaccine R&D. Expectations aren’t too high (see the analyses ahead of the meeting, below), given that they aim for a “Rome Declaration of Principles”. Also some advocacy below. HPW - Draft ‘Rome Declaration’ by G-20 Global Health Summit – Sidesteps Hard Commitments to New Finance and Vaccine Donations https://healthpolicy-watch.news/draft-g-20-health-summit-declaration-sidesteps-hard- commitments-to-new-finance-and-vaccine-donations/ Analysis ahead of the Global Health summit from late last week didn’t sound too promising... “A draft “Rome Declaration” to be issued at next Friday’s G-20’s Global Health Summit, co-hosted by Italy and the European Commission (21 May), makes a series of 10 sweeping commitments to ensure equitable access to vaccines; expand medicines manufacturing capacity; assure WHO access to sites posing an outbreak risk; and invest in global health systems. But the draft manifesto seen by Health Policy Watch, framed as a “statement of principles,” also lacks any concrete targets for COVID vaccine dose-sharing, or medicines and vaccines finance. “ “… WHO and other global health officials have repeatedly said that COVAX and the other ACT- Accelerator initiatives urgently need some US$18.5 billion from the world’s most industrialised nations to fund purchases of medicines and tests, as well as vaccines. WHO and other global health officials have also begged for more vaccine donations. That means that if any such concrete commitments are to be made, they will have to be negotiated up until, and on, the day of the meeting of G-20 leaders. …” … The draft declaration so far also sidesteps mention of another thorny issue – the proposed World Trade Organization (WTO) waiver on intellectual property rights for COVID products, that the United States recently said it would support, in the case of vaccine IP. A placeholder text, however, leaves open “{…possible references to ACT-A, WTO activity, WHO, the MPP, C-TAP, and through bilateral arrangements}.”
The draft also stops short… of calling for a new Pandemic Treaty. “Finally, the draft Rome declaration also calls for a stronger global health architecture with a “fully funded, independent and effective WHO at its centre”. … … The Rome Declaration is being pitched primarily as a general statement of principles, according to the summit’s advance statement…” See also Reuters – G20 snubs COVID patent waiver, waters down pledge on WHO’s funding “Leaders of the world’s largest economies back “voluntary licensing” of COVID-19 vaccine patents, the draft conclusions of a summit show, watering down a U.S. push for waivers and earlier commitments to supply more funds to the World Health Organization….” “The health summit's draft conclusions reflect these differing views and make no mention of patent waivers. G20 leaders are to commit instead to "patent-pooling" which is a less radical measure to encourage the sharing of patents. It is still an "unfriendly" move for pharmaceutical companies, an industry expert said, but far less extreme than a patent waiver.” “… The conclusions may also deal a blow to the WHO and its scheme to accelerate the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, drugs and tests across the world. Global leaders reaffirm their support for the scheme, known as ACT Accelerator, but refrain from clearly committing to fully funding it. They "underline the necessity to close its funding gap with fair burden sharing", the draft document reads, and they call for the scheme's "strategic review". This represents a major watering down of the initial draft in which leaders explicitly committed for the first time to "fair and full financing" of the scheme. The original draft, also seen by Reuters, was more influenced by the European Commission which is one of the hosts of the summit, together with the Italian government which holds the G20 presidency this year…” FT - EU to back expansion of vaccine production capacity in Africa https://www.ft.com/content/d2a47c7e-0b00-4e31-92ab-cd3ff0b9070b From Monday. “The EU plans to throw its weight behind a push to expand vaccine manufacturing in Africa after the coronavirus pandemic has underscored a need to broaden the production of life saving jabs. Ursula von der Leyen, European Commission president, is expected to back proposals to establish strategic manufacturing hubs in African countries at a global health summit in Rome on Friday, officials said. … … The bloc is also keen to promote initiatives to increase international vaccine production, which it argues is a better way to improve poor nations’ access to Covid-19 vaccines than the patent waivers proposed by the US this month. The EU’s contribution could include both direct EU aid and funding from national development agencies and the European Investment Bank, European officials said. Alongside the funding, which could extend into the hundreds of millions of euros, Brussels wants to help build up regulatory capacity, including the establishment of the African Medicines Agency — a continent wide drug regulator that was conceived in 2014 but has yet to get off the ground….” “The European efforts are designed to mesh with an African Union goal set in April for up to 60 per cent of Africa’s routine vaccine needs to be supplied from within the continent by 2040, up from just 1 per cent now. Given the long timeframes involved in creating manufacturing capacity, the changes would be aimed at dealing with possible future pandemics and perennial threats such as yellow fever. …”
The People’s Vaccine - COVID vaccines create 9 new billionaires with combined wealth greater than cost of vaccinating world’s poorest countries https://app.box.com/s/c487wmiyquh9q1glpbatzf5sukls7ph2 “At least nine people have become new billionaires since the beginning of the COVID pandemic, thanks to the excessive profits pharmaceutical corporations with monopolies on COVID vaccines are making, The People’s Vaccine Alliance revealed today ahead of a G20 leaders Global Health Summit. …. Between them, the nine new billionaires have a combined net wealth of $19.3 billion, enough to fully vaccinate all people in low-income countries 1.3 times. … … In addition, eight existing billionaires–who have extensive portfolios in the COVID-19 vaccine pharma corporations - have seen their combined wealth increase by $32.2 billion, enough to fully vaccinate everyone in India…. Reuters – Invest in health or face credit ratings 'stick' -WHO's expert panel Reuters; “States that invest too little in public health could have their credit ratings cut, according to the chair of a World Health Organization panel that wants a new global body set up to spell out the risks to financial stability from healthcare failures. The comments by Mario Monti come before a global health summit on Friday in Rome at which leaders of the Group of 20 richest economies will discuss the coronavirus emergency and how to prevent major health crises in future. "A pandemic like this one poses huge threats not just to financial stability but to the whole economic and financial system," Monti told Reuters. … The former Italian prime minister chairs the WHO's Pan-European Commission on Health and Sustainable Development, set up last September by the world health body's chief for Europe, Hans Kluge. It has recommended the G20 establish a Global Health Board which would work to prevent future pandemics by identifying risks, setting global benchmarks for preparedness and promoting investment in health infrastructure….” And via Politico: “…the European Union might announce vaccine donations. The European Commission asked EU members to donate 100 million doses, but countries are reluctant to commit to a number just yet…” 74th World Health Assembly coming up (24 May – 1 June) https://www.who.int/about/governance/world-health-assembly/seventy-fourth-world-health- assembly With preliminary docs & agenda. Some reads & analyses ahead of the WHA, related to some key issues on the agenda. As Suerie Moon put it at the Graduate Institute introduction for new delegates (on Thursday), “for Covid to become a game changer, we need at all levels: political leadership, political courage, political wisdom, and political mobilization. “
HPW - Pandemic Treaty & Other New COVID Initiatives Grab Center Stage At World Health Assembly https://healthpolicy-watch.news/pandemic-covid-world-health-assembly/ Must-read analysis ahead of the WHA. “Conquering the COVID-19 pandemic will inevitably be the main topic for discussion at the impending 74th session of the World Health Assembly, which begins Monday, 24 May. Global health experts weighed in this week at a series of briefings on what to expect from at the upcoming event. …” “The annual World Health Assembly will open online on Monday, with ministers of health from the World Health Organization’s 194 member states tasked with wading through a heavy agenda dominated by how to fix the COVID-ridden global health system and step up global response to future crises. …” Among others, focal points at the WHA will be: Pushing for Legally Binding Instruments to Fight Pandemics; Cementing the Power of the WHO to Fight Off Future Health Crises and Eradicate the Current Pandemic; WHO’s political independence; governance and funding without strings attached; the question of vaccine equity.” And this quote: “In the absence of strong action by wealthy donor countries at the G-20 and the WHA, the trajectory of COVID risks the disease becoming a “pandemic of the poor”, Joanne Liu warns. For Liu, if the opportunity is not seized at this year’s WHA to adequately address the WHA, by taking bold decisions and committing to actions then she believes COVID will become an endemic disease, mostly but will be limited to low and middle income countries, whilst high income countries leave the rest of the world behind. Geneva Observer – What does the WHO need? Public health experts are unanimous: More power, more independence, and more transparency. https://www.thegenevaobserver.com/ Some more pre-analysis by Jamil Chade. Based on the three reports presented and debated during the WHA. Plus: “…Debating and accepting the reports’ conclusions might be the easy part. Agreeing to transfer power to the organization and fund it adequately might prove to be more difficult and require some serious diplomatic jostling. It is expected that a resolution calling for the strengthening of the organization will be approved by consensus—the draft is circulating—but after that things will proceed incrementally once the low-hanging fruits are dealt with….” The draft has been watered down substantially already…. HPW – Far-reaching Proposals For Reform On Table at World Health Assembly – But Will Member States Heed The Call? https://healthpolicy-watch.news/far-reaching-proposals-for-reform-on-table-at-world-health- assembly-but-will-member-states-heed-the-call/
Coverage of the “Introduction to WHA 74 session,” by the Global Health Centre of the Geneva Graduate Institute. “…some far-reaching recommendations for reform that will be on the table this year could make a big difference, said a group of high-level global health voices … They referred to proposals by The Independent Panel for a Pandemic Treaty; limiting the Director General’s term to one five-seven year stint to remove the position from political influences; and the granting of stronger investigative powers to visit countries and publish data on outbreak threats, said Julio Frenk, former minister of health for Mexico and president of the University of Miami, speaking at the event. …” “However, in the realpolitik of WHA negotiations, passage of most of these key reform measures remains doubtful to dim, people close to the organisation also told Health Policy Watch….” “…That has led to two versions of a draft WHA resolution circulating. According to one version, WHA member states would explicitly agree to begin negotiations towards a legal treaty or convention on pandemics. But the other version would merely agree upon the creation of a working group to take forward the recommendations of the Independent Panel as well as two other investigative committees, which explored the functionality of the International Health Regulations as well as WHO’s own emergency response team during the pandemic….” Geneva Health Files - Tied Funds To WHO, But Flexible Funds To Its Partners: Sustainable Financing Working Group Confronts Challenges P Patnaik; Geneva Health Files; Last week Friday’s GHF issue, with focus on the discussions in WHO’s Sustainable Financing Working group. “As WHO’s working group on sustainable financing gets down to work, it is bringing to light the extent to which its financing is tied – this includes even those funds coming from partner agencies. The inter-governmental working group on sustainable financing met late last month (April 29-30) for its second meeting and set off discussions on the potential ways to prioritize essential functions of the WHO given the limited access to “sustainable funds” that the organization currently has. Geneva Health Files spoke to diplomatic sources who were present at the meeting, to get an understanding on the discussions evolving within the working group. The emergency preparedness resolution currently being discussed among WHO member states is expected to come up with a set of recommendations for this working group. …” A few excerpts: “… Member states were informed at the meeting that while donor countries provided flexible funds to WHO partners including Gavi – The Vaccine Alliance and The Global Fund, those donors however provided earmarked funding to WHO. … In addition, it also emerged that the funds from these WHO partners come to WHO in a tied manner. … … … When these agencies were created, it was decided that they would only accept unearmarked funding and long-term funding, the source said. (This is in the form of replenishments.) Representatives from Gavi and The Global Fund were invited to the meeting to discuss these issues. … One of the reasons for member states’ preference to give flexible funds to other global health agencies include the governance structure….” … “…
Officials at the meeting discussed the various options that the working group can consider in order to prioritise essential functions of WHO… during these preliminary discussions, it appears that member states have not been able to prioritise essential functions within the programme budget, an official said. …” And a final remark: “… Clearly, the narratives around WHO financing are unfolding in complex times with deep geopolitical changes underway, and in the context of a disruptive pandemic which has transformed international health policy-making in definitive terms including in the creation and endorsement of super structures such as the ACT Accelerator. Inevitably these will have implications for financing which helps set policy priorities for WHO. “Essentially, the other global health players do not want to enter the intricacies of emergencies’ preparedness and response, and that is why the financing of WHO shall now be increasingly geared towards emergencies. We are observing this Davos ‘reset language’ in the context of redefining roles and financial strategies for the WHO,” Nicoletta Dentico, a global health governance expert said at a recent event discussing sustainable financing. “ See also WHO - Sustainable financing Report of the first and second meeting of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing Report by the Director-General (14 May) Report of the two meetings so far by this Working Group on sustainable financing. HPW - Top Scientists Call For Further Investigation Into Virus Origins Ahead Of World Health Assembly https://healthpolicy-watch.news/86225-2/ “A group of 18 prominent scientists, primarily based in the United States, have called for further investigations into the origins of the SARS-CoV2 virus, including that it could have been created in the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab, in a letter published on Thursday in the journal Science. …” AP - Diplomats, donors concerned about sex abuse reports at WHO https://apnews.com/article/united-nations-europe-ebola-virus-health- edfde9bd5d8b251488f3174f6585868f “British, European and American diplomats and donors have voiced serious concerns about how the World Health Organization handled sex abuse allegations involving its own staff during an outbreak of Ebola in Congo, as reported this week by The Associated Press….” See also Thomson Reuters - Rocked by new sex claims, World Health Organization appeals for information “ Facing scrutiny over new claims of sexual abuse by its workers, the World Health Organization (WHO) on Wednesday urged anyone with information to come forward so that action can be taken….”
Nature Editorial - Universal health care must be a priority — even amid COVID https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01313-3 “A focus on specific diseases has derailed efforts to achieve health care for all before. The world must not repeat that mistake with COVID-19.” “The WHO has placed ‘health for all’ high on the agenda of next week’s meeting, hoping to drive political and financial commitments from governments. Perhaps mindful of the vagueness that doomed past efforts, Tedros has created a new council of economists, health and development experts to advise on the economics of providing everyone with basic health care, including ways to quantify its value.” “Universal health care might seem a lofty goal amid a crisis, but if we do not push for change now, we will regret it. The pandemic has increased the number of people living in extreme poverty, making them more vulnerable to disease. It’s infected, killed and traumatized health-care workers everywhere, most devastatingly in places that had too few already. “Our failure to invest in health systems doesn’t only leave individuals, families and communities at risk, it also leaves the world vulnerable to outbreaks and other health emergencies,” Tedros said in October 2019. “A pandemic could bring economies and nations to their knees.” A few months later, it did. We must not let that happen again.” Devex – Will the World Health Assembly adopt a pandemic treaty? https://www.devex.com/news/will-the-world-health-assembly-adopt-a-pandemic-treaty-99952 The “ crystal ball “ question as somebody put it. “A pandemic treaty can take months to years to draft and negotiate, and it’s unlikely one would be adopted at next week’s 74th World Health Assembly. But some experts are hoping member states would endorse a resolution for the formation of an intergovernmental task force to draft and negotiate a treaty….” Related link: Politico - US and Russia seek to squash talks for pandemic treaty “… Washington and Moscow are cool to talks on the creation of a pandemic treaty and are stalling efforts to bring forward a decision at the World Health Assembly starting May 24, according to several officials in Geneva, Switzerland, with knowledge of the discussions. This resistance has brought conversations on the decision down to the wire. Negotiations are further complicated by push back from several other countries that argue there isn’t sufficient time to discuss a treaty as long as they battle the ongoing pandemic. …” “…The U.S. remains skeptical, saying more time is needed to consider recommendations from international panels examining what went wrong with this pandemic response. The focus, a senior U.S. health official said, should be on building global consensus on how to strengthen WHO….” Quote: “… “Our current collective efforts should be focused on achievable near-term goals, which can lay the groundwork for any potential instrument in the future,” the U.S. official added. But one
of the Geneva officials who spoke to POLITICO suggested that the real U.S. concern may lie elsewhere: Getting enough support to pass the treaty in the U.S. Senate, which would require a two-thirds majority — in other words, Republican support.” BMJ Analysis - Post-covid reforms: can we avoid fighting the last war? https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1184 One of the reads of the week. “Anna Bezruki and Suerie Moon explain why post-pandemic reforms are unlikely to leave the world fully prepared for the next emergency and argue for a focus on strong monitoring systems and flexible arrangements” The authors discuss the difference post-Ebola reforms made for covid-19, the remaining gaps and blind spots, and implications for the future. Key messages: “The global response to covid-19 has benefited from reforms implemented after the west African Ebola crisis; These include national preparedness, increased data sharing, international investment in vaccine research, and a stronger WHO; However, gaps and blind spots in that reform process left the world unprepared for the magnitude, breadth, and severity of the covid-19 pandemic; Wide ranging reforms are needed, but only a few are likely to be implemented, particularly those most relevant to covid-19; Post-covid reforms should prioritise continuous monitoring of the global system and flexible arrangements to adapt governance as new possible pandemics emerge.” Graduate institute (report) - Envisioning an international normative framework for pandemic preparedness and response issues, instruments and options G L Burci, S Moon et al; https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/299175 19 p. Commissioned by and prepared for the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. “…Calls for a “pandemic treaty”, first proposed by the president of the European Council and since endorsed by 26 heads of state and the Director-General of the WHO, have added some specificity and urgency to this question. This paper offers a concise analysis of the global systemic weaknesses to be addressed, the range of options of international normative instruments for doing so, and the strengths and weaknesses of each. We then turn to the suitability of WHO as the host intergovernmental organization for such an instrument. The paper concludes with three “menus” of options for possible paths forward.” With a ‘basic menu’, ‘deluxe menu’, and ‘business menu’ for such a possible pandemic treaty. • Another link related to the pandemic treaty: South Centre - The Proposed Pandemic Treaty and the Challenge of the South for a Robust Diplomacy “…. he proposal nonetheless raises some structural and procedural conundrums for the Global South. The negotiation of a pandemic treaty should, as a matter of necessity, take into account the asymmetries of World Health Organization member-states and the interests of the Global South….”
WHO - Stronger collaboration for an equitable and resilient recovery towards the health-related sustainable development goals: 2021 progress report on the global action plan for healthy lives and well-being for all https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240026209#.YKaAaFv8vBk.twitter “This second, annual Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being for All (SDG3 GAP) progress report illustrates how the SDG3 GAP is providing an important, long-term improvement platform for collaboration among 13 agencies in the multilateral system as they support countries on the path towards an equitable and resilient recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and further progress towards the health-related SDGs.” With 8 case studies. Think Global Health – Six Things to Watch at The World Health Assembly https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/six-things-watch-world-health-assembly Pre-analysis by David Fidler. The 6 things are: global vaccine access; preparing for the next pandemic; strengthening WHO and global health governance; the geopolitical factor; what developing countries want; the pandemic’s collateral damage. Gates & “winds of change” in the US press ? NYT - Long Before Divorce, Bill Gates Had Reputation for Questionable Behavior https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/16/business/bill-melinda-gates-divorce-epstein.html Some evidence of clumsy behaviour, and perhaps a bit more in the light of MeToo (cfr this pertinent tweet Angela Rasmussen – “Don’t know who needs to hear this but “sought to initiate an intimate relationship” with a subordinate is not “an affair,” which implies a relationship between two mutually consenting people outside of a spectacularly lopsided workplace power dynamic.” But no smoking gun re the Epstein connection – the only thing that would be a ‘game changer’ (at least in my (European middle-aged male) opinion). On the latter, the Daily Beast reported, “The billionaire met Epstein dozens of times starting in 2011 and continuing through to 2014 mostly at the financier’s Manhattan home—a substantially higher number than has been previously reported.” “…a former Gates Foundation employee told The Daily Beast that Gates wanted to get in the good graces of some of Epstein’s professional connections. “My understanding was he wasn’t hanging out with Epstein to get women,” the employee said….” See also FT - Bill Gates says investigation into affair ‘in no way related’ to leaving Microsoft board “Bill Gates has denied that Microsoft’s investigation into an “intimate relationship” with an employee two decades ago had any impact on his decision to leave the software company’s board last year.”
(Investigative journalist) Tim Schwab in a Twitter thread, putting some things in perspective https://twitter.com/TimothyWSchwab/status/1394398555863928835 “The rapidly evolving investigation into #BillGates & #MeToo creates serious contradictions w/ #GatesFoundation's woman-forward, equity-focused brand/PR. I don't underestimate Bill Gates, but this is a major existential crisis that could end the #GatesFoundation as we know it. ” “The real threat to the #GatesFoundation right now is not the rule of law or institutional dynamics within a private foundation, but rather the court of public opinion. And by that I mean the news media turning against Bill Gates. The fact that NYT, WSJ et al. are doing some hard (tho maybe still restrained) reporting on #BillGates & #MeToo means he's losing perhaps his most important and long-standing ally.” “Over the last decade the news media has been incredibly kind to Bill Gates, dead focused on his good deeds and very rarely interrogating his or his foundation's power (or flaws/failures/abuses). I had enormous difficulty trying to get this published…” “ For years, the news media coverage of the #GatesFoundation has traded in fiction and mythology: presenting Gates as a warm and virtuous sweater-wearing saint of a man, unimpeachable in his devotion to fixing the world, and highly effective in these efforts.” For more, see The Nation - The Fall of the House of Gates? (by Tim Schwab) ACT-A (including Covax donations & other Covax news) As mentioned above, a key issue today is whether ACT-A will be fully financed at the G20 summit (or not). It doesn’t seem likely, for the moment. The Accelerator – News from ACT-A https://spark.adobe.com/page/78pUl1wI9CfuT/ ACT-A has started a newsletter. Among others, this could imply ACT-A will become a global health stakeholder beyond this pandemic as well, not just for this one. Some excerpts: “In March, WHO, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and partners created a special COVAX task force to identify manufacturing plants that could be quickly adapted to carry out some of the steps of vaccine production—a prelude to the group’s longer-term goal of building a widely dispersed, sustainable network of vaccine makers. … “ PS: Germany and South Africa are co-chairs of this new working group.
For more info on this taskforce, see also GAVI - COVAX Manufacturing Task Force to tackle vaccine supply challenges … At a virtual summit in mid-April, the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention and the African Union launched their Partnership for African Vaccine Manufacturing, with plans to create an ecosystem of sustainable vaccine development that would provide for 60 percent of the continent’s routine immunization needs by 2040. That number stands at 1 percent today. … … The Partnership plans to set up five vaccine production hubs on the continent over the next 10 to 15 years. The first three hubs, in Rwanda, Senegal and South Africa, would produce mRNA vaccines. These cutting-edge vaccines have only just come into use, developed in response to COVID-19 pandemic. … With the right support, factories in Egypt, Morocco, Senegal, South Africa and Tunisia that are now packaging and labeling vaccines, and occasionally filling vials, could broaden their roles….” “… fundraising for diagnostics has been tough. ACT-A’s diagnostics pillar needs US$ 8.7 billion for 2021 to keep pace with the demands of the pandemic. Diagnostics is the least funded of the four ACT-Accelerator pillars; contributions have been running eightfold behind the contributions for vaccines….” “In its sixth meeting, the ACT-Accelerator Facilitation Council on Wednesday focused on helping countries build stronger health systems to fight COVID-19 and prepare for future emergencies. … … The Council also discussed COVAX's new task force on expanding vaccine production, and hosted a session on raising US$ 18.5 billion to finance the global pandemic response through the end of 2021.” And some ACT-A related global health events coming up: “21 MAY: Global Health Summit, Rome… present an urgent case for burden-sharing among countries to fast-track equitable access to COVID-19 tools. Vaccine sharing, scaling up vaccine production, and reaching full funding for ACT-A will be discussed. 2 June: COVAX AMC summit, hosted by Japan for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. 11-13 June, 47th G7 summit, in Cornwall, UK. Funding for ACT-A is expected to be a focal point for discussion.” GAVI - Japan to host Gavi's COVAX Advance Market Commitment (AMC) Summit https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room/japan-host-gavis-covax-advance-market-commitment- amc-summit “ The Government of Japan yesterday announced that it will host the virtual Gavi COVAX Advance Market Commitment (AMC) Summit on June 2nd 2021. The event, co-hosted by Japanese Prime Minister H.E. Yoshihide Suga and José Manuel Barroso, Chair of the Gavi Board, will aim to secure at least US $8.3 billion for 2020-21 in order to accelerate access to 1.8 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses for lower-income economies via the Gavi COVAX Advance Market Commitment by raising an additional US$ 2 billion from donors and the private sector in addition to US$ 6.3 billion raised before the campaign was launched at the “One World Protected” event on April 15th. … Securing 1.8 billion doses would enable the AMC to protect nearly 30% of the population in all AMC countries, or roughly half the entire adult population. Currently, the AMC has funds in place to protect approximately 20% of populations, equivalent to all health and social care workers, elderly and those with underlying health conditions….”
FT - Indian vaccine maker to hold off exporting Covid jabs https://www.ft.com/content/63fbbb79-f657-4e6c-b190-cffd0d630593 Another setback for Covax. “The Serum Institute of India, the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer, plans to hold off exporting Covid-19 jabs again until the end of the year in a blow to countries depending on its shipments to start their campaigns. “We continue to scale up manufacturing and prioritise India,” chief executive Adar Poonawalla said on Tuesday. “We also hope to start delivering to Covax and other countries by the end of this year,” he added, referring to the multilateral global vaccine programme….” Meanwhile, GAVI hopes COVID-19 vaccine exports from India can resume in Q3 (Reuters). But for now, “As India confronts a truly dreadful wave of the pandemic, Indian vaccine production, including the 140m vaccine doses initially destined for Covax, have been committed to protecting its own citizens,” a Gavi spokesperson told Reuters.” Via AP - “Zain Rizvi, a law and policy researcher at the advocacy group, Public Citizen, called the new delay announced by the Serum Institute “a nightmare” for global vaccine access. “COVAX has no plausible path to meeting its modest goals unless rich countries share doses and technology immediately,” he said.” In SSA (and other parts of the world counting on Covax), they’re very worried, clearly. See Reuters - … India's halt to vaccine exports 'very problematic' for Africa “…. An extended halt to exports of COVID-19 vaccines from India, where authorities are battling a wave of domestic infections, risks derailing vaccination efforts already underway in Africa, one of the continent's top health officials said on Tuesday.” “…. Africa has lagged far behind other regions due to supply issues and meagre financial resources but had planned to vaccinate 30-35% of its population by the end of the year and 60% within the next two to three years. …. "This is very problematic as it means unpredictability of our vaccination programmes and a serious risk of not achieving our stated target... on time," the director of the Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, John Nkengasong, wrote to Reuters. “ HPW - WHO Appeals For Vaccine Donations To Cover Huge COVAX Shortfall https://healthpolicy-watch.news/who-appeals-for-dose-donations-to-cover-huge-covax-shortfall/ “COVAX has a shortfall of 190 million COVID-19 vaccine doses, and the few manufacturers that have reached agreements with the facility will only deliver later in the year or even in 2022, World Health Organization (WHO) Director Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Monday.” “Pfizer has committed to providing 40 million doses of vaccines to COVAX this year, but the majority of these would be [delivered] in the second half of 2021. We need those right now and call on them to bring forward deliveries, as soon as possible,” Tedros told the body’s biweekly pandemic briefing. “Moderna has signed a deal for 500 million doses with COVAX but the majority has been promised only for 2022. We need Moderna to bring hundreds of millions of this forward into 2021 due to the
acute moment of this pandemic.” Meanwhile, COVAX discussions with Johnson & Johnson about getting its vaccine had not been finalised, he added….” “… Tedros added that manufacturers needed to give the right of first refusal to COVAX for any additional dose capacity and also enter into their deals with manufacturers such as Inceptor, Biolyse, Teva and others that are willing to use their facilities to produce COVID-19 vaccines. … … Bruce Aylward, WHO’s lead at COVAX, stressed that the vaccine platform’s aim to ensure that 20% of the world’s population was vaccinated by the end of the year was “at risk” because of supply shortages. However, he said that COVAX was in talks with a number of countries and was hopeful about “the possibility of larger-scale donations over the coming days, hopefully weeks at the longest”. “I’d like to emphasise that, in speaking to everyone, no one has surplus doses”, but would be donating from what they had,” said Aylward. … Norway and Sweden have already made donations, while France, New Zealand, Belgium, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Spain, Portugal and US have all indicated that they want to donate. …” See also Reuters - WHO chief urges COVID-19 vaccine makers to advance doses for COVAX “The head of the World Health Organization called on manufacturers to make COVID-19 vaccine doses available to the COVAX vaccine-sharing facility earlier than planned due to a supply shortfall left by Indian export disruptions. … Specifically, he asked Pfizer (PFE.N)to bring forward deliveries of some 40 million doses in the second half of the year and asked Moderna(MRNA.O)to make doses pledged for 2022 available this year.” WSJ - Biden Commits to Exporting Covid-19 Vaccines by End of June https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-to-commit-to-exporting-covid-19-vaccines-by-end-of-june- 11621269053?mod=hp_lead_pos7 “The U.S. plans to share 20 million doses of Covid-19 vaccines produced by Moderna Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson with the rest of the world, President Biden said, on top of the 60 million AstraZeneca doses it had already promised to export. Mr. Biden said Monday that 80 million vaccine doses are expected to be exported by the end of June. The AstraZeneca doses will be delivered once federal authorities sign off. … Mr. Biden said Jeff Zients, the White House Covid-19 coordinator, will lead the administration’s global vaccination efforts. Gayle Smith, a State Department official who is coordinating the U.S.’s role in the global coronavirus response, will also be a key part of the effort, Mr. Biden said. “ And via Reuters – U.S. will donate substantial portion of vaccines through COVAX -U.S. official | Reuters “The United States will donate a significant number of COVID-19 vaccines through the World Health Organization's COVAX scheme for distributing doses to poorer countries, the U.S. global coordinator on COVID Gayle Smith told a news conference. … Smith said that the United States was also planning to increase its funding for COVAX, in addition to $2 billion which she said it had already donated to the facility in past months….”
Geneva Health Files - At Risk: COVAX Plans to Vaccinate 20% of the People in LMICs Geneva Health Files; See also above. “A top WHO official admitted this week, that initial plans to vaccinate 20% of the populations in LMICs might be at risk. Bruce Aylward, who leads the ACT Accelerator efforts at WHO, said at a briefing that the Facility faces a gap of 150 million by the end of May and that gap will increase in June. This could put at risk, the goal of vaccinating 20% of the people in the AMC countries, he said. … … The calls for more transparency in the supply forecasts from The COVAX Facility has gone louder in recent days, with even the International Chamber of Commerce calling for greater transparency on “when countries can expect shipments – and, if there are bottlenecks or issues getting orders to some countries, how these can be addressed.”…” GAVI - Go Give One campaign gives public the opportunity to support access to COVID-19 vaccines for lower-income countries https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room/go-give-one-campaign-gives-public-opportunity-support- access-covid-19-vaccines “The Go Give One campaign launches today, giving everyone everywhere a chance to play their part in helping to vaccinate the world. Created by the WHO Foundation, the campaign asks individuals to donate US$ 7 for a COVID-19 vaccine dose, with the aim of getting 50 million people to take part in the campaign. The money raised goes to the COVAX Advanced Market Commitment (AMC) … Part of the new campaign is a matching feature that allows companies around the world to contribute through a simple fundraising mechanism that puts the campaign in front of their employees or customers….” Trips waiver & tech transfer The debate (and momentum?) on a temporary waiver continues, even if Team Europe doesn’t want to have much to do with it. They rather want to focus on removing obstacles to commercial trade of vaccines. Reuters - Backers of WTO vaccine waiver ask opponents to join talks - document Backers of WTO vaccine waiver ask opponents to join talks - document “Supporters of a proposal to waive patent rights on COVID-19 vaccines at the World Trade Organization are set to call on opponents to join the negotiations, stressing the gravity of the pandemic, a draft document showed on Monday.” "The cosponsors call on all delegations who have not yet indicated that they will join text-based discussions, to do so as soon as possible," the 62 proponents of the waiver, including India and South Africa that initially floated the proposal, said in a co-authored draft statement. "Continuous mutations and emergence of new variants of SARS-COV-2 highlight the significant uncertainties and complexities of controlling SARS-COV-2 and underscore the urgency of this proposal," they said. "A failure to respond in a timely manner on the waiver proposal undermines the legitimacy and
credibility of the WTO." That call was echoed by the WTO's chief on Monday. "We need to sit down at the negotiating table and actually look at a text. People are dying, and the faster we can sit down and look at a text the better," said Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala at a virtual meeting of the Paris Peace Forum.” “… The next formal TRIPS council meeting at the WTO is scheduled for June 8.” See also TWN - Co-sponsors of TRIPS waiver proposal call for solidarity at WTO (19 May) Reuters – Vaccine patent waiver will not be enough -WTO chief https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/vaccine-patent-waiver-will-not-be- enough-wto-chief-2021-05-20/ “Waiving intellectual property rights for COVID-19 vaccines will not be enough to narrow the huge supply gap between rich and poor countries, the head of the World Trade Organization said on Thursday. …. Speaking to the European Parliament on Thursday, WTO director-general Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala said it was clear that an IP waiver alone would not be enough. "To have solved the unacceptable problem of inequity of access to vaccines, we have to be holistic. It's not one or the other," she said, adding this could not drag out for years….” FT - Biden urged to oblige US vaccine makers to share technology https://www.ft.com/content/9408223f-0a6c-43b7-9f67-c7e4697005c2 “Activists say president should build on patent waiver with transfer of knowhow as part of global Covid fight.” “Many of the scientists and campaigners who helped persuade Joe Biden to back an intellectual property waiver for Covid vaccines are urging the US president to go further and force vaccine makers to hand over their technology. … … many experts say that even if the WTO waiver proposal secures the necessary support of every member, production will not rise quickly enough. Instead they want companies to hand over instructions for how to make their vaccines to other companies around the world, even if that ends up undercutting their own revenues. They say it is especially important to do so with mRNA vaccines such as those made by BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna, given they can be modified more quickly to deal with potential emerging variants.” “One possibility is that the president could use his powers under the Korean war-era Defense Production Act to seize companies’ technology on the government’s behalf and then share that with other countries. Another is that the government could use its own patents to force vaccine makers’ hands. Moderna in particular has used a patent in its vaccine without a licence from the National Institutes of Health, which invented that piece of technology. … … Alternatively, the administration could set up an organisation to act as a third-party broker negotiating technology transfer deals on behalf of US manufacturers. The Clinton Foundation plays this role with HIV drugs, and says it has helped bring down costs by 100 times in certain parts of the world. The WHO has already launched a Covid-19 patent pool for companies to share their IP, and experts say this could also prove a global technology broker if needed….”
FT - Brussels seeks to regain initiative on Covid vaccine patent debate https://www.ft.com/content/e84e927c-b99f-4113-ab46-280930f74f74 “EU calls for countries to use flexibility in current WTO system before waiving IP rights” “Valdis Dombrovskis, executive vice-president of the European Commission, said World Trade Organization members should use existing rules to make it easier to share intellectual property (IP) for coronavirus jabs, rather than expand the ability of governments to override patents, as proposed by the US. Given the pandemic represents a national emergency, the requirement to negotiate with rights holders to license the production of Covid vaccines could be waived, he said in prepared remarks to the European Parliament. The intervention was a plea for countries to increase access to vaccine technology under the existing WTO agreement known as Trips, rather than create a major new loophole in the IP regime by waiving patents. But experts questioned whether the EU’s more cautious approach to patents would have a significant impact on the debate….” “… Dombrovskis said the EU was also willing to engage in discussions for a “targeted and time- limited” patent waiver, but he said WTO members still needed to have full details of what the US was proposing. EU member states have given the US suggestion a frosty reception. Dombrovskis also confirmed that the EU would shortly be launching an initiative to boost vaccine manufacturing in Africa. …” See also Bloomberg: “The European Union’s executive arm will present a proposal to the World Trade Organization calling on other countries to help boost vaccine production capacity in developing countries and export more shots while they explore a possible waiver on patents….” “…Specifically this would mean limiting the application of export restrictions in order to keep supply chains open, and applying no restrictions to exports toward developing countries included in the Covax aid program….” “The EU’s proposal to the WTO will be based on three components: boosting trade in vaccines and limiting restrictions on exports; expanding production, with the help of current vaccine manufacturers; a review of intellectual property rights, including potential compulsory licensing. “ But see also this tweet on the European parliament: “@Europarl_EN passes a resolution to urge the European commission to support the proposal to suspend patents on Covid19 vaccines and treatments. Lets keep up the pressure and get the EU and UK to stop blocking progress on negotiations. #PeoplesVaccine.” Guardian – Britain in talks to waive Covid vaccine patents to improve global access to jabs https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/may/20/britain-in-talks-to-waive-covid- vaccine-patents-to-improve-global-access-to-jabs “The UK government is in talks about a plan to waive Covid-19 vaccine patents to boost the production of shots in low and middle-income countries, the Guardian can reveal. The discussions
You can also read