Hikurangi Plateau subduction a trigger for Vitiaz arc splitting and Havre Trough opening (southwestern Pacific)

Page created by Ralph Robinson
 
CONTINUE READING
Hikurangi Plateau subduction a trigger for Vitiaz arc splitting and Havre Trough opening (southwestern Pacific)
https://doi.org/10.1130/G48436.1

                                                                                                                                               Manuscript received 15 May 2020
                                                                                                                                  Revised manuscript received 12 November 2020
                                                                                                                                         Manuscript accepted 15 November 2020

          © 2021 The Authors. Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license.

          Hikurangi Plateau subduction a trigger for Vitiaz arc splitting
          and Havre Trough opening (southwestern Pacific)
          K. Hoernle1,2, J. Gill3, C. Timm1,4, F. Hauff1, R. Werner1, D. Garbe-Schönberg2 and M. Gutjahr1
          1
            EOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 24148 Kiel, Germany
           G
          2
           Institute of Geosciences, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany
          3
            Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
          4
             GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand

          ABSTRACT                                                                                                              et al., 2011). It formed at ca. 125 Ma as part
               Splitting of the Vitiaz arc formed the Tonga-Kermadec and Lau-Colville Ridges (south-                            of the Ontong Java–Manihiki–Hikurangi super-
          western Pacific Ocean), separated by the Lau Basin in the north and Havre Trough in the                               plateau, which broke apart shortly after forma-
          south. We present new trace element and Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb isotope geochemistry for the Kermadec                             tion (e.g., Davy et al., 2008; Hoernle et al.,
          and Colville Ridges extending ∼900 km north of New Zealand (36°S–28°S) in order to (1)                                2010). The basement of the plateau fragments
          compare the composition of the arc remnants with Quaternary Kermadec arc volcanism,                                   consists of two distinct geochemical types:
          (2) constrain spatial geochemical variations in the arc remnants, (3) evaluate the effect of                          (1) low-Ti basalts (Kroenke and Kwaimbaita
          Hikurangi igneous plateau subduction on the geochemistry of the older arc lavas, and (4)                              groups on Ontong Java) have isotopically inter-
          elucidate what may have caused arc splitting. Compared to the Kermadec Ridge, the Colville                            mediate compositions similar to that of primi-
          Ridge has higher more-incompatible to less-incompatible immobile element ratios and largely                           tive mantle, and (2) high-Ti basalts (Singallo
          overlapping isotope ratios, consistent with an origin through lower degrees of melting of more                        group on Ontong Java) have enriched mantle
          enriched upper mantle in the Vitiaz rear arc. Between ca. 8 and 3 Ma, both halves of the arc                          1 (EM1)–type basement with unradiogenic
          (∼36°S–29°S) included a more enriched (EM1-type) composition (with lower 206Pb/204Pb and                              206
                                                                                                                                    Pb/204Pb but radiogenic Sr isotope ratios
          207
              Pb/204Pb and higher Δ8/4 Pb [deviation of the measured 208Pb/204Pb ratio from a Northern                          (e.g., Tejada et al., 2004; Hoernle et al., 2010;
          Hemisphere basalt regression line] and 87Sr/86Sr) compared to older and younger arc lavas.                            Timm et al., 2011; Golowin et al., 2018). Where
          High-Ti basalts from the Manihiki Plateau, once joined to the Hikurangi Plateau, could serve                          stratigraphic information is available, the high-
          as the enriched Vitiaz arc end member. We propose that the enriched plateau signature, seen                           Ti basalts overlie the low-Ti basalts. Between
          only in the isotope ratios of mobile elements, was transported by hydrous fluids from the                             ca. 117 and 79 Ma, spreading along the Osbourn
          western margin of the subducting Hikurangi Plateau or a Hikurangi Plateau fragment into                               Trough paleo–spreading center, now located at
          the overlying mantle wedge. Our results are consistent with plateau subduction triggering                             ∼25.5°S latitude, created ∼3000 km of seafloor
          arc splitting and backarc opening.                                                                                    between the Hikurangi and Manihiki Plateaus
                                                                                                                                (e.g., Mortimer et al., 2019). The northern tip
          INTRODUCTION                                                    can et al., 1985; Wright et al., 1996; Timm et al.,   of the subducting Hikurangi Plateau is presently
              Volcanic arcs play a key role in the plate                  2019; Caratori Tontini et al., 2019). Mechanisms      located at ∼36°S.
          tectonic paradigm, being the surface expres-                    for triggering arc splitting, however, are con-            Here we present new trace element and Sr-
          sion of plate convergence. Nevertheless, little                 troversial (Sdrolias and Müller, 2006; Wallace        Nd-Hf-Pb isotopic data from 40 locations on
          is known about the long-term tectonic and geo-                  et al., 2009).                                        the Kermadec (KR) and Colville (CR) Ridges
          chemical evolution of submarine remnant arc                         Subduction of young igneous oceanic pla-          between ∼28°S and 36°S (Fig. S1 in the Supple-
          systems formed by arc splitting and backarc                     teaus is unlikely due to their buoyancy, as dem-      mental Material1), recovered primarily on the
          basin opening, largely due to their inaccessi-                  onstrated by the Hikurangi Plateau when it col-       R/V Sonne cruise SO255. We show that geo-
          bility. Contemporaneous Neogene volcanism on                    lided with and accreted to the Chatham Rise           chemical variations along both ridges are nearly
          the Tonga-Kermadec and Lau-Colville Ridges                      at ca. 105 Ma, becoming part of the Zealandia         identical, confirming that they once formed a
          (southwestern Pacific Ocean; Fig. 1) supports                   microcontinent. The present-day Hikurangi Pla-        single arc, and that differences between the
          the idea that the subparallel ridges were once                  teau represents a rare example of an oceanic          ridges reflect the KR having been the frontal
          part of a single volcanic arc (termed the Vitiaz                plateau being subducted into Earth’s mantle           arc and the CR the rear arc of the Neogene Vitiaz
          arc), which split at ca. 5.5–3 Ma to form the Lau               beneath the North Island of New Zealand and           arc. Some of the late Neogene (8–3 Ma) Vitiaz
          Basin and Havre Trough (e.g., Gill, 1976; Dun-                  the southern Kermadec arc (Fig. 1) (Reyners           arc had an enriched composition distinct from

              1
                Supplemental Material. Supplemental information about the samples and analytical methods, including Fig. S1), Table S1 (geochemical data), and Table S2
          (replicates and reference materials). Please visit https://doi​.org/10.1130/GEOL.S.13377182 to access the supplemental material, and contact editing@geosociety.
          org with any questions.

              CITATION: Hoernle, K., et al., 2021, Hikurangi Plateau subduction a trigger for Vitiaz arc splitting and Havre Trough opening (southwestern Pacific): Geology,
          v. 49, p. XXX–XXX, https://doi.org/10.1130/G48436.1

          Geological Society of America | GEOLOGY | Volume XX | Number XX | www.gsapubs.org                                                                                         1

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/doi/10.1130/G48436.1/5208662/g48436.pdf
by guest
Hikurangi Plateau subduction a trigger for Vitiaz arc splitting and Havre Trough opening (southwestern Pacific)
ca. 8–3 Ma and depleted volcanism perhaps
                                                                                                                                continuously since the early Miocene.
                                                                                                                                    Plots of isotope ratios versus latitude (with
                                                                                                                                1° latitude added to CR samples to compen-
                                                                                                                                sate for northwest-southeast opening of the
                                                                                                                                Havre Trough) show that isotopic variations are
                                                                                                                                nearly identical along the KR and CR (Fig. 3),
                                                                                                                                confirming that they once formed a single vol-
                                                                                                                                canic arc (Gill, 1976; Timm et al., 2019; Cara-
                                                                                                                                tori Tontini et al., 2019). The shift to higher
                                                                                                   Figure 1. (A) Map showing    more-incompatible to less-incompatible ele-
                                                                                                   location of the Tonga-Ker-   ment ratios in the CR than the KR lavas at simi-
                                                                                                   madec arc-backarc system
                                                                                                   and Hikurangi Plateau.       lar isotopic composition suggests derivation
                                                                                                   Red box shows location of    of CR lavas through lower degrees of melting
                                                                                                   the map in Figure S1 (see    beneath the rear arc. KCR lavas with enriched
                                                                                                   footnote 1). Base map is     compositions were found between 29°S and
                                                                                                   from GEBCO_2014 Grid
                                                                                                                                37°S (corrected CR; Fig. 3) with the strongest
                                                                                                   (version 20150318; http://
                                                                                                   www.gebco.net).              enriched signal being located at ∼33°S, charac-
                                                                                                                                terized by the lowest 206Pb/204Pb and 207Pb/204Pb
                                                                                                                                and highest 87Sr/86Sr ratios. Therefore, the
                                                                                                                                enriched arc signature appears to have been
                                                                                                                                limited both temporally and spatially, although
                                                                                                                                more geochronology is necessary to define its
                                                                                                                                exact duration.
                                                                                                                                    We now review possible origins of the
                                                                                                                                enriched end member, beginning with the
                                                                                                                                mantle wedge. Assuming corner flow, enriched
                                                                                                                                intraplate mantle as found in South Fiji Basin
                                                                                                                                seamounts and intraplate CR samples could
                                                                                                                                have flowed from the backarc beneath the
          that of the Quaternary Kermadec volcanic arc,                   (≤18.37) and 207Pb/204Pb (≤15.53) and higher          older arc. The South Fiji seamount and intra-
          consistent with subduction of the Hikurangi Pla-                87
                                                                             Sr/86Sr (≥0.7047) at similar 208Pb/204Pb, Nd,      plate CR source, however, has higher 206Pb/204Pb
          teau or a plateau fragment. The enriched lavas                  and Hf isotope ratios, indicating an enriched         and lower 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios than the KCR
          occur along a segment of the arc where part of                  mantle (EM1)–type component in the source of          lavas and therefore cannot explain the enriched
          the forearc is missing, consistent with removal                 the KCR lavas (between ∼29.5°S and 36.5°S),           (EM1-type) signature (Fig. 2). There is also no
          by plateau subduction. Plateau collision and sub-               not yet found in the Quaternary lavas.                evidence of a plume beneath the arc, because
          duction is a possible mechanism for causing arc                      Alkalic seamounts behind and late-stage          the enriched lavas show typical subduction zone
          splitting and backarc basin opening.                            cones on the CR (designated “intraplate CR”)          incompatible element abundances, e.g., low
                                                                          have higher Nb/Th (4.3, 9.5–15.5), Ce/Pb (3–32),      Ce/Pb (2.0–11.2, n = 74) and Nb/U (0.7–7.6,
          RESULTS                                                         Nb/U (9–50, LOI
A                                                                                                                               B

                          C                                                                                                                               D

          Figure 2. 206Pb/204Pb versus 208Pb/204Pb (A), 207Pb/204Pb (B), 87Sr/86Sr (C), and 143Nd/144Nd (D) isotope diagrams for depleted and enriched (EM1-
          type; ca. 8–3 Ma) Kermadec Ridge and Colville Ridge lavas, Quaternary Kermadec volcanic arc (QKVA) lavas, Havre Trough backarc (HTBA)
          lavas, sediments data, and Manihiki North Plateau samples (Golowin et al., 2018; Timm et al., 2019, and references therein; Hauff et al., 2021;
          Gill et al., 2021). In C, the arrow labelled “Subducted sediments” points to the subducted sediment field, which plots above the range in the
          diagram. Pacific and Indian mid-oceanic ridge basalt (MORB) is from the PetDB (http://www.earthchem.org/petdb).

          explain the enriched composition (Castillo                      have extended as far north as 29°S. Alterna-   propose that between ca. 8 and 3 Ma, high-Ti
          et al., 2009; Hoernle et al., 2010).                            tively, EM1 plateau material may have also     plateau basalts with an EM1-type composition,
              The Hikurangi Plateau currently subducts                    been incorporated in the ocean lithosphere     similar to Manihiki North Plateau lavas, sub-
          south of 36°S, but isotopic evidence suggests                   (crust and/or mantle) formed directly after    ducted beneath the southern Vitiaz arc possibly
          that it may underlie the present arc as far north               plateau breakup at ca. 117 Ma (Fig. 4). We     as far north as ∼29°S.
          as ∼32°S (Timm et al., 2014). The enriched
          KCR isotopic signature, however, cannot be
          explained by the composition of the low-Ti
          Hikurangi basement, sampled along ∼50 km
          of the Rapuhia scarp (Hoernle et al., 2010).
          Detailed sampling and geochemical studies
          have also been conducted on the Manihiki                                                                                           Fi g u re    3. Plot      of
          Plateau, which was once joined to the north-                                                                                       206
                                                                                                                                                Pb/204Pb versus latitude,
          ern part of the Hikurangi Plateau. The high-Ti                                                                                     showing a peak in enrich-
          lavas from the Manihiki North Plateau have                                                                                         ment (lowest 206Pb/204Pb)
                                                                                                                                             at 33°S. One degree of
          appropriate Pb and Sr isotopic compositions
                                                                                                                                             latitude has been added to
          (Timm et al., 2011; Golowin et al., 2018) to                                                                                       Colville Ridge samples to
          serve as the EM1 component in the enriched                                                                                         correct for the opening of
          KCR lavas (Fig. 2). Although estimates of the                                                                                      the Havre Trough. Refer-
          maximum size of the Hikurangi Plateau based                                                                                        ences are as for Figure 2.
          on super-plateau reconstructions extend the
          plateau to ∼32°S (Timm et al., 2014), it is
          possible that a relatively thin finger of plateau
          material or plateau fragment, separated from
          the western edge of the Manihiki Plateau, may

          Geological Society of America | GEOLOGY | Volume XX | Number XX | www.gsapubs.org                                                                            3

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/doi/10.1130/G48436.1/5208662/g48436.pdf
by guest
subduction, and (2) Vitiaz arc splitting and
              A                                                        C                                                       Havre Trough opening.
                                                                                                                                   Because there has been only minor clockwise
                                                                                                                               rotation of the Kermadec forearc from 10 Ma to
                                                                                                                               the present (Sdrolias and Müller, 2006), another
                                                                                                                               possible mechanism is removal of forearc litho-
                                                                                                                               sphere (Wolf and Huismans, 2019). Subduc-
                                                                                                                               tion of a positive bathymetric anomaly on the
                                                                                                                               downgoing plate, such as an aseismic ridge or
                                                                                                                               plateau fragment, would enhance basal litho-
                                                                                                                               spheric erosion of the overriding plate, result-
                                                                                                                               ing in subsidence and extension of the margin
              B                                                        D                                                       (Clift et al., 2003). Between 29°S and 34°S,
                                                                                                                               the lithosphere thickness beneath the forearc
                              Enriched
                                                                                                                               thins to ∼10–11 km but reaches thicknesses of
                               oceanic                                                                                         16–17 km to the north (25°S–26°S) (Stratford
                           lithosphere ?                                                                                       et al., 2015; Bassett et al., 2016), which may
                                                                                                                               reflect basal forearc removal by plateau sub-
                                                                                                                               duction. In order to explain the absence of the
                                                                                                                               ∼110-km-wide Tonga Ridge (located ∼160 km
                                                                                                                               from the trench at ∼25°S–26°S) in the forearc
                                                                                                                               south of ∼30.5°S, Collot and Davy (1998) pro-
                                                                                                                               posed frontal forearc removal. Removal of a
                                                                       E                                                       large block of the forearc could have resulted in
                                                                                                                               extension as the overriding plate moved trench-
                                                                                                                               ward to compensate for forearc removal, and
                                                                                                                               could explain migration of the arc westward
                                                                                                                               away from the trench (Keppie et al., 2009)
                                                                                                                               beginning at ∼30°S and away from the KR into
                                                                                                                               the eastern Havre Trough south of ∼32°S (Bas-
                                                                                                                               sett et al., 2016). Thus, lithospheric removal
                                                                                                                               by plateau collision and subduction could also
                                                                                                                               be an important mechanism contributing to arc
                                                                                                                               splitting and backarc basin opening.
                                                                                                                                   Finally, the enriched plateau signal disap-
          Figure 4. Model to explain the presence of enriched signal in Kermadec Ridge and Colville                            pears in the KR and CR volcanism at ca. 3 Ma,
          Ridge lavas between ca. 8 and 3 Ma. (A) At ca. 120 Ma, Ontong Java rifts away from the Mani-                         and normal oceanic crust is presently subduct-
          hiki + Hikurangi plateau fragment. (B) At ca. 117–97 Ma, spreading along the Osbourn spreading                       ing in the region where the enriched signal was
          center creates ∼3000 km of seafloor between Manihiki and Hikurangi (Mortimer et al., 2019).
          Some oceanic lithosphere formed near rifted margins of plateau fragments may also have                               observed (29°S–36°S). Once the plateau frag-
          enriched plateau-like composition. At ca. 105 Ma, Hikurangi collides with the Gondwana sub-                          ment fully subducted and thinner “normal” Cre-
          duction margin, which later becomes the Chatham Rise of Zealandia. (C) At ca. 10 Ma, the                             taceous oceanic crust started subducting again,
          western margin of Hikurangi is just outboard of the Kermadec–North Island (New Zealand)                              some slab rollback would have been likely. This
          trench. (D) From ca. 8 to 3 Ma, the western Hikurangi margin subducts beneath the Vitiaz arc,
                                                                                                                               could also have been an important mechanism
          which splits into Colville Ridge (CR) and Kermadec Ridge (KR), forming the Havre Trough. (E)
          Present configuration. (Modified from Davy et al., 2008; Timm et al., 2014.)                                         causing or contributing to backarc rifting and/
                                                                                                                               or spreading. We need better constraints on the
                                                                                                                               timing of Havre Trough opening and plateau
          Causes of Arc Splitting and Backarc Basin                        the incoming plate (e.g., seamount province,        subduction in order to constrain the exact mech-
          Opening                                                          hotspot track, or oceanic plateau) with the         anism further.
              The causes of splitting of the Vitiaz arc                    subduction margin. The collision “pins” the             As is clear from Ontong Java, plateau col-
          into the KR and CR and the formation of the                      subduction zone, resulting in trenchward rota-      lision with a subduction zone will not always
          Havre Trough backarc basin are enigmatic.                        tion of the forearc about the pinned pivot point,   result in arc splitting and backarc rifting. Due
          Extension in the overriding plate can trig-                      causing extension, arc splitting, and backarc       to its larger size, greater thickness, and younger
          ger backarc rifting and/or spreading (Karig,                     rifting and/or spreading (McCabe, 1984). An         age at collision than the Hikurangi plateau mar-
          1971). Rollback of the subducting slab causes                    important criterion for causing backarc opening     gin or plateau fragment when it collided with
          trench retreat, resulting in extension in the                    by a collision is that the “indentor enter[s] the   New Zealand, the Ontong Java Plateau was too
          overriding plate (Jurdy, 1979), but rollback                     subduction margin just prior to the initiation      buoyant and thick to subduct and clogged the
          is unlikely to be a major process during sub-                    of the back-arc rifting event” (Wallace et al.,     subduction zone, resulting in subduction polar-
          duction of thickened plateau crust (e.g., as                     2009, p. 9). Based on the presently available       ity reversal, so that normal ocean crust could
          much as 35 km beneath the Hikurangi Plateau;                     age and geochemical data, the first evidence        again subduct. In summary, there appears to
          Reyners et al., 2011).                                           for plateau subduction was at ca. 8 Ma, pre-        be a continuum from collision and subduc-
              Another mechanism for generating exten-                      ceding the initial Havre Trough opening at ca.      tion of seamount clusters and hotspot tracks
          sion in the overriding plate is forearc rotation                 5.5–3 Ma (Caratori Tontini et al., 2019), con-      resulting in forearc rotation and backarc rift-
          caused by collision of a buoyant indentor on                     sistent with a connection between (1) plateau       ing (Wallace et al., 2009), to collision of older

          4                                                                                www.gsapubs.org | Volume XX | Number XX | GEOLOGY | Geological Society of America

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/doi/10.1130/G48436.1/5208662/g48436.pdf
by guest
plateau f­ ragments causing lithospheric removal                Gill, J., Hoernle, K., Todd, E., Hauff, F., Werner, R.,      Reyners, M., Eberhart-Phillips, D., and Bannister,
          (­accompanied by arc splitting and backarc open-                     Timm, C., Garbe-Schönberg, D., Gutjahr, M.,                  S., 2011, Tracking repeated subduction of the
                                                                               2021, Basalt geochemistry and mantle flow dur-               Hikurangi Plateau beneath New Zealand: Earth
          ing), to collision of large and thick plateaus over                  ing early backarc basin evolution: Havre Trough              and Planetary Science Letters, v. 311, p. 165–
          a long stretch of an arc that shuts down subduc-                     and Kermadec Arc, southwest Pacific: Geo-                    171, https://doi​.org/10.1016/​j.epsl.2011.09.011.
          tion, causing polarity reversal in oceanic sub-                      chemistry Geophysics Geosystems, https://doi.           Sdrolias, M., and Müller, R.D., 2006, Controls on
          duction zones.                                                       org/10.1029/2020GC009339 (in press).                         back-arc basin formation: Geochemistry Geo-
                                                                          Golowin, R., Portnyagin, M., Hoernle, K., Hauff,                  physics Geosystems, v. 7, Q04016, https://doi​
                                                                               F., Werner, R., and Garbe-Schönberg, D.,                     .org/10.1029/2005GC001090.
          ACKNOWLEDGMENTS                                                      2018, Geochemistry of deep Manihiki Plateau             Stratford, W., Peirce, C., Funnell, M., Paulatto, M.,
          We thank the shipboard and scientific crews of R/V                   crust: Implications for compositional diver-                 Watts, A.B., Grevemeyer, I., and Bassett, D.,
          Sonne for a successful SO255 cruise; S. Hauff, K.                    sity of large igneous provinces in the Western               2015, Effect of Seamount subduction on forearc
          Junge, and U. Westernströer for analytical support;                  Pacific and their genetic link: Chemical Geol-               morphology and seismic structure of the Tonga-
          O. Ishizuka, B. Jicha, and B. Stern for helpful formal               ogy, v. 493, p. 553–566, https://doi.​ org/10.1016/​         Kermadec subduction zone: Geophysical Journal
          reviews; I. Grevemeyer for helpful comments; and the                 j.chemgeo.2018.07.016.                                       International, v. 200, p. 1503–1522, https://doi​
          German Federal Ministry of Education and Research               Hauff, F., Hoernle, K., Gill, J., Werner, R., Timm, C.,           .org/10.1093/gji/ggu475.
          (BMBF) (grant 03G0255A), GEOMAR Helmholtz                            Garbe-Schönberg, D., Gutjahr, M., and Jung, S.,         Tejada, M.L.G., Mahoney, J.J., Castillo, P.R., Ingle,
          Centre (Kiel, Germany), and GNS Science (New Zea-                    2021, R/V SONNE Cruise SO255 “VITIAZ”:                       S.P., Sheth, H.C., and Weis, D., 2004, Pin-prick-
          land) for funding this project.                                      An integrated major element, trace element and               ing the elephant: Evidence on the origin of the
                                                                               Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotope data set of volcanic rocks               Ontong Java Plateau from Pb-Sr-Hf-Nd isotopic
          REFERENCES CITED                                                     from the Colville and Kermadec Ridges, the Qua-              characteristics of ODP Leg 182 basalts, in Fit-
          Ballance, P.F., Ablaev, A.G., Pushchin, I.K., Pletnev,               ternary Kermadec volcanic front and the Havre                ton, J.G., et al., eds., Origin and Evolution of the
               S.P., Birylina, M.G., Itaya, T., Follas, H.A., and              Trough backarc basin (version 1.0): Interdisci-              Ontong Java Plateau: Geological Society [Lon-
               Gibson, G.W., 1999, Morphology and history                      plinary Earth Data Alliance (IEDA), https://doi​             don] Special Publication 229, p. 133–150, https://
               of the Kermadec trench–arc–backarc basin–                       .org/10.26022/IEDA/111723 (accessed October                  doi​.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.229.01.09.
               remnant arc system at 30 to 32°S: Geophysical                   2020).                                                  Timm, C., Hoernle, K., Werner, R., Hauff, F., van den
               profile, microfossil and K-Ar data: Marine Geol-           Hoernle, K., Hauff, F., van den Bogaard, P., Werner,              Bogaard, P., Michael, P., and Coffin, M.F., and
               ogy, v. 159, p. 35–62, https://doi​.org/10.1016/                R., Mortimer, N., Geldmacher, J., Garbe-Schön-               Koppers, A., 2011, Age and geochemistry of the
               S0025-3227(98)00206-0.                                          berg, D., and Davy, B., 2010, Age and geochem-               oceanic Manihiki Plateau, SW Pacific: New evi-
          Bassett, D., Kopp, H., Sutherland, R., Henrys, S.,                   istry of volcanic rocks from the Hikurangi and               dence for a plume origin: Earth and Planetary
               Watts, A.B., Timm, C., Scherwath, M., Greve-                    Manihiki oceanic plateaus: Geochimica et Cos-                Science Letters, v. 304, p. 135–146, https://doi​
               meyer, I., and de Ronde, C.E.J., 2016, Crustal                  mochimica Acta, v. 74, p. 7196–7219, https://doi​            .org/10.1016/​j.epsl.2011.01.025.
               structure of the Kermadec arc from MANGO                        .org/10.1016/​j.gca.2010.09.030.                        Timm, C., et al., 2014, Subduction of the oceanic
               seismic refraction profiles: Journal of Geophysi-          Hofmann, A.W., Jochum, K.P., Seufert, M., and White,              Hikurangi Plateau and its impact on the Ker-
               cal Research: Solid Earth, v. 121, p. 7514–7546,                W.M., 1986, Nb and Pb in oceanic basalts: New                madec arc: Nature Communications, v. 5, 4923,
               https://doi​.org/10.1002/2016JB013194.                          constraints on mantle evolution: Earth and Plan-             https://doi​.org/10.1038/ncomms5923.
          Caratori Tontini, F., Bassett, D., de Ronde, C.E.J.,                 etary Science Letters, v. 79, p. 33–45, https://doi​    Timm, C., de Ronde, C.E.J., Hoernle, K., Cousens,
               Timm, C., and Wysoczanski, R., 2019, Early                      .org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90038-5.                           B., Wartho, J.-A., Caratori Tontini, F., Wysoc-
               evolution of a young back-arc basin in the Havre           Jurdy, D.M., 1979, Relative plate motions and the                 zanski, R., Hauff, F., and Handler, M., 2019,
               Trough: Nature Geoscience, v. 12, p. 856–862,                   formation of marginal basin: Journal of Geo-                 New age and geochemical data from the South-
               https://doi​.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0439-y.                     physical Research, v. 84, p. 6796–6802, https://             ern Colville and Kermadec Ridges, SW Pacific:
          Castillo, P.R., Lonsdale, P.F., Moran, C.L., and                     doi​.org/10.1029/JB084iB12p06796.                            Insights into the recent geological history and
               Hawkins, J.W., 2009, Geochemistry of mid-                  Karig, D.E., 1971, Origin and development of mar-                 petrogenesis of the Proto-Kermadec (Vitiaz) Arc:
               Cretaceous Pacific crust being subducted along                  ginal basins in the western Pacific: Journal of              Gondwana Research, v. 72, p. 169–193, https://
               the Tonga-Kermadec Trench: Implications for the                 Geophysical Research, v. 76, p. 2542–2561,                   doi​.org/10.1016/​j.gr.2019.02.008.
               generation of arc lavas: Lithos, v. 112, p. 87–102,             https://doi​.org/10.1029/JB076i011p02542.               Todd, E., Gill, J.B., Wysoczanski, R.J., Hergt, J.M.,
               https://doi​.org/10.1016/​j.lithos.2009.03.041.            Keppie, D.F., Currie, C.A., and Warren, C., 2009,                 Wright, I.C., Leybourne, M.I., and Mortimer, N.,
          Clift, P.D., Pecher, I., Kukowski, N., and Hampel, A.,               Subduction erosion modes: Comparing finite                   2011, Hf isotopic evidence for small-scale hetero-
               2003, Tectonic erosion of the Peruvian forearc,                 element numerical models with the geologi-                   geneity in the mode of mantle wedge enrichment:
               Lima Basin, by subduction and Nazca ridge                       cal record: Earth and Planetary Science Let-                 Southern Havre Trough and South Fiji Basin back
               collision: Tectonics, v. 22, 1023, https://doi​                 ters, v. 287, p. 241–254, https://doi.​ org/10.1016/​        arcs: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v. 12,
               .org/10.1029/2002TC001386.                                      j.epsl.2009.08.009.                                          Q09011, https://doi​.org/10.1029/2011GC003683.
          Collot, J.Y., and Davy, B., 1998, Forearc structures            McCabe, R., 1984, Implications of paleomagnetic              Turner, S.P., and Hawkesworth, C.J., 1998, Using geo-
               and tectonic regimes at the oblique subduction                  data on the collision related bending of island              chemistry to map mantle flow beneath the Lau
               zone between the Hikurangi Plateau and the                      arcs: Tectonics, v. 3, p. 409–428, https://doi​              Basin: Geology, v. 26, p. 1019–1022, https://doi​
               southern Kermadec margin: Journal of Geo-                       .org/10.1029/TC003i004p00409.                                .org/10.1130/0091-7613(1998)0262.3.CO;2.
               doi​.org/10.1029/97JB02474.                                     Magoni, C., Calvert, A.T., and Bosch, D.,               Wallace, L.M., Ellis, S., and Mann, P., 2009, Colli-
          Davy, B., Hoernle, K., and Werner, R., 2008, Hikurangi               2007, Oligocene–Miocene tectonic evolution                   sional model for rapid fore-arc block rotations,
               Plateau: Crustal structure, rifted formation, and               of the South Fiji Basin and Northland Plateau,               arc curvature, and episodic back-arc rifting in
               Gondwana subduction history: Geochemistry                       SW Pacific Ocean: Evidence from petrology                    subduction settings: Geochemistry Geophys-
               Geophysics Geosystems, v. 9, Q07004, https://                   and dating of dredged rocks: Marine Geol-                    ics Geosystems, v. 10, Q05001, https://doi​
               doi​.org/10.1029/2007GC001855.                                  ogy, v. 237, p. 1–24, https://doi​.org/10.1016/​             .org/10.1029/2008GC002220.
          Duncan, R.A., Vallier, T.L., and Falvey, D.A., 1985,                 j.margeo.2006.10.033.                                   Wolf, S.G., and Huismans, R.S., 2019, Mountain build-
               Volcanic episodes at Eua, Tonga Islands, in                Mortimer, N., Gans, P.B., Palin, J.M., Mef-                       ing or backarc extension in ocean-continent sub-
               Scholl, D.W., and Vallier, T.L., eds., Geology                  fre, S., Herzer, R.H., and Skinner, D.N.B.,                  duction systems: A function of backarc lithospheric
               and Offshore Resources of Pacific Island Arcs—                  2010, Location and migration of Miocene–                     strength and absolute plate velocities: Journal of
               Tonga Region: Houston, Texas, Circum-Pacific                    Quaternary volcanic arcs in the SW Pacific                   Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, v. 124, p. 7461–
               Council for Energy and Mineral Resources, Earth                 region: Journal of Volcanology and Geother-                  7482, https://doi​.org/10.1029/2018JB017171.
               Science Series, v. 2, p. 281–290.                               mal Research, v. 190, p. 1–10, https://doi​             Wright, I.C., Parson, L.M., and Gamble, J.A., 1996,
          Gill, J.B., 1976, Composition and age of Lau                         .org/10.1016/​j.jvolgeores.2009.02.017.                      Evolution and interaction of migrating cross-arc
               Basin and Ridge volcanic rocks: Implica-                   Mortimer, N., van den Bogaard, P., Hoernle, K., Timm,             volcanism and back-arc rifting: An example from
               tions for evolution of an interarc basin and                    C., Gans, P.B., Werner, R., and Riefstahl, F., 2019,         the southern Havre Trough (35°20′–37°S): Jour-
               remnant arc: Geological Society of Amer-                        Late Cretaceous oceanic plate reorganization                 nal of Geophysical Research, v. 101, p. 22,071–
               ica Bulletin, v. 87, p. 1384–1395, https://doi​                 and the breakup of Zealandia and Gondwana:                   22,086, https://doi​.org/10.1029/96JB01761.
               .org/10.1130/0016-7606(1976)872.0.CO;2.                                                   doi​.org/10.1016/​j.gr.2018.07.010.                     Printed in USA

          Geological Society of America | GEOLOGY | Volume XX | Number XX | www.gsapubs.org                                                                                                  5

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/doi/10.1130/G48436.1/5208662/g48436.pdf
by guest
You can also read