Greensborough Activity Centre Transport Masterplan - November 2017
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
2 Greensborough Walk
Executive Summary The Masterplan will guide local transport and The Greensborough Activity Centre Transport movement investment decisions and inform Masterplan (GTMP) will guide the realisation Council’s role in advocating for the best local of Council’s vision for the activity centre as a outcomes in these strategic infrastructure major public transport hub for the northeast projects within the State Government’s control, region of Melbourne providing regional access now and in the future. It will ensure that these to jobs, education, shopping and services while projects provide an outcome which aligns with supporting a vibrant local community. key policy objectives of the City of Banyule and The GTMP outlines the immediate transport the GTMP. challenges facing the Greensborough Activity Of particular priority is investment in the Centre including poorly integrated public development of a high quality integrated bus transport services, lack of cycling access and and rail transport interchange, at the heart of the a lack of pedestrian amenity. It responds to the activity centre. Developing an efficient, reliable continued growth in Greensborough and the and attractive public transport interchange will emergence of a number of significant strategic act as a catalyst to improve pedestrian and cycle city shaping projects being pursued by the access as well as reduce reliance on private Victorian State Government. These key projects vehicles. include the M80 Upgrade, the Hurstbridge Rail Line Duplication and North East Link. The time is right for a coordinated approach to planning and investment that provides an The scale of these projects in such close outcome for the activity centre which aligns with proximity to the Greensborough Activity Centre Council’s and the State Government’s objectives presents a significant opportunity but also a of creating vibrant, healthy and economically potential risk in how the activity centre continues successful communities. to develop. To mitigate this risk and fully respond to the opportunities afforded by these state significant projects, there is an immediate need for the State Government to invest in transport infrastructure which will safeguard Greensborough’s role as a major activity centre. 3
4 Main Street
I Contents Executive Summary p.3 Where to from here p.32 A New Integrated Greensborough Transport Interchange p.34 PTV Bus Services Review p.34 Introduction p.7 A Movement and Place Investigation for Greensborough p.36 Local Transport Infrastructure Projects p.39 The Vision for Greensborough Vision p.8 Objectives p.10 Actions p.44 Implementation Plan p.46 Setting the Scene Greensborough Activity Centre p.12 Policy and Strategy Framework p.14 Current Transport Issues p.16 State Government Transport Initiatives p.22 M80 Upgrade p.24 Hurtsbridge Rail Line Duplication p.26 North East Link p.28 Community Consultation p.30 5
6 Greensborough Walk
Introduction Greensborough Activity Centre is a growing Government. Council manages the local employment hub, attracting growth in both road network while the State Government commercial and civic employment. It is also well is responsible for high level land use and positioned and has capacity for high density transport planning policy, public transport development, with a large portion of the activity and the arterial road network. To ensure the centre identified for higher density residential success of the GTMP it is critical that both To ensure the success of and mixed use development. levels of government work together to deliver the GTMP it is critical that an integrated approach to transport and Greensborough’s transport and movement movement within the activity centre. both levels of government network is currently facing a number of work together to deliver challenges. To date, investment in this critical The GTMP will guide local transport and an integrated approach to infrastructure has been poor, not reflecting movement investment decisions and inform Greensborough’s role as a growing major activity Council’s role in advocating for the best local transport and movement centre that provides important services for outcomes from strategic infrastructure projects within the activity centre the northeast region of Melbourne. Continued within the State Government’s control, now growth, as well as the development of a number and into the future. of major state significant transport projects in close proximity to Greensborough, present a significant opportunity but also a potential risk in how the activity centre continues to develop. The Greensborough Transport Masterplan (GTMP) has been developed to fully respond to the opportunities afforded by state government investment in the broader region. It delivers a plan for Greensborough’s transport and movement network which envisions the future Greensborough Activity Centre as a vibrant local community that is enhanced by its role as a highly functional public transport hub for the northeast region. Responsibility for provision and planning of transport within Greensborough is shared between the Council and the Victorian State 7
The Vision for Greensborough Council’s vision for transport and movement within Greensborough reflects the wider Banyule Integrated Transport Plan (BITP) which envisions Banyule to be a city with accessible, sustainable and active communities, with good access to jobs, education, shopping and community opportunities within a safe transport network. This has been refined to give a specific future transport vision for Greensborough which takes into account its significant location as a major transport hub in the northeast region of metropolitan Melbourne. Greensborough needs to be strongly linked into the wider public transport network as well as have good access to wider cycling networks. It must also be a vibrant place to be and contain attractive walk-able spaces within the activity centre where people can safely access local services along with social and recreational opportunities. 8
Vision Statement Greensborough Activity Centre is a major public transport hub for the Northeast providing local and regional access to jobs, education, shopping and services while supporting a vibrant local community. 9
Objectives The objectives for transport and movement to These municipal wide objectives inform the and within Greensborough are underpinned by objectives of the GTMP as listed in Table 1 below the strategic transport objectives for Banyule and discussed further on the following pages: as outlined in the BITP. The strategic objectives support: • Transport accessibility and mobility for all members of our communities; Objective 1 Improve public transport including: a new integrated Greensborough Transport Interchange, improved bus routes, stop locations, frequency and services within and to Greensborough, • Land use and development that encourages duplication of the Hurstbridge rail line between Greensborough and Eltham, and a 10 minute rail active and public transport use; service frequency to Greensborough. • The provision of walking and cycling infrastructure and facilities; Objective 2 Manage through traffic to facilitate pedestrian, cycling, and public transport priority in the Greensborough Activity Centre. • The provision of public transport infrastructure and services; Objective 3 Improve pedestrian access within the Greensborough Activity Centre. • A local road user hierarchy that prioritises walking, cycling, and public transport before Objective 4 Improve cycle access to and within the Greensborough Activity Centre. private vehicles; and • Advocacy and leadership on all of these important transport considerations to ensure Table 1: . Objectives of the Greensborough Activity Centre Transport Masterplan the best outcomes for our communities. 10
The first objective for transport and movement to and Building on these themes the third and fourth objectives within Greensborough is the development of an efficient of the GTMP are to improve pedestrian access within and and reliable public transport system which offers a high cycling access to and within the activity centre. Streets quality passenger experience. An efficient, reliable and within the activity centre will be places where people live, attractive public transport network is vital to improving work and play. They will provide priority for pedestrians, accessibility for those with mobility restrictions, improving cyclists and public transport, with sole occupant private pedestrian and cycling access, reducing reliance of vehicles and long term on street parking being the lowest private vehicles as well as developing a street network priorities. They will be accessible to all and provide access which supports an accessible, safe, healthy and vibrant for a range of uses in order to deliver a safe, integrated community. and efficient transport system. They will facilitate walking and cycling which will be encouraged and become a Central to this objective is the development of a transport mainstream transport choice for trips to, from and within interchange with integrated bus and rail connections which the activity centre, reducing reliance on private vehicles. link Greensborough to the local and wider region. This critically important land use development will be supported by a network of bus routes that operate to enhance the connectivity to the activity centre along with improved frequency of both rail and bus services. This objective also includes the vitally important delivery of the duplication of the Hurstbridge rail line between Greensborough and Eltham. The second objective of the GTMP is to manage through traffic in the activity centre to facilitate pedestrian, cycling, and public transport priority. In acknowledgement of Greensborough being a major destination in its own right, the transport and movement network will support the philosophy of ‘to not through’, encouraging trips to and from the activity centre whilst reducing the impact of through traffic. Through traffic is to be actively managed to reduce its impact on pedestrians, cyclist and public transport users. 11
Setting the Greensborough Activity Centre Scene Located 17 kilometres north-east of Melbourne, Greensborough is identified within Plan Melbourne as a Major Activity Centre. It fulfils a diverse range of roles, including housing, retail, commercial and civic services. The Greensborough Activity Centre provides the local and wider community with opportunities to live, work, shop and play. Facilities include: • Banyule City Council’s main administrative headquarters, at 1 Flintoff Street; • Main Street and Grimshaw Street strip shopping centres, which include a range of retail stores plus dining opportunities; • Greensborough Plaza, a large internalised shopping mall; Greensborough Activity • A multi-screen cinema; Centre • A range of specialist medical facilities; • Key social infrastructure including Centrelink; and Policy and Strategy Framework • WaterMarc, an important aquatic and leisure facility for northern metropolitan Melbourne. Current Transport Issues 12
Greensborough Location Plan 13
Policy and Strategy Framework Local Government In 2015 the Greensborough Structure Plan was document for the state and also sets out strategy for updated to include more intense development, transport infrastructure and facilities. Council has a number of relevant policy documents particularly around Flintoff Street and Grimshaw A key principle and direction of the Plan that is of that support the objectives of the GTMP. These are Street. This increase in activity will drive the need particular relevance to Greensborough Activity outlined below. for a transport and movement network which is safe Centre is the opportunity to live locally through the and comfortably facilitates movement by foot and In 2006 Council adopted the Greensborough creation of 20-minute neighbourhoods - accessible, bicycle. Structure Plan which provides a framework for safe and attractive local areas where people can the redevelopment of strategic precincts within In 2016 Council adopted the Northern Regional Trails access most of their everyday needs within a the activity centre, and identifies opportunities for Strategy which was developed in conjunction with 20-minute walk, cycle or local public transport trip. reshaping the centre and re-establishing pedestrian six of our neighbouring municipalities in Melbourne’s The recently released (October 2017) Victorian networks and urban environments. It seeks to northern region. The Strategy supports the Infrastructure Plan responds to Infrastructure promote a sustainable traffic and transport network, provision of important cycling access to the Banyule Victoria’s 30-year Infrastructure Strategy released maximise mobility for all, and ensure an integrated municipality and is highly relevant to providing in December 2016. It includes funding details for centre that is legible, connected and easy to navigate access for cyclists to the Greensborough Activity the next five years for transport infrastructure for pedestrians. Centre from surrounding areas via the Plenty River projects that impact on the northeast region Trail, the Banyule Shared Trail, the Greensborough More recently, in 2015, Council adopted the Banyule including the upgrading of the M80 Ring Road, to Eltham Link Trail and the Metropolitan Ring Road Integrated Transport Plan 2015- 2035 (BITP), a long the ongoing Level Crossing Removal Program ( to Trail. term strategic plan that guides transport and land include the duplication of the Hurstbridge rail line use decisions in the municipality. The BITP provides from Greensborough to Eltham), the development an overall framework to address transport issues State Government of the North East Link, and general bus and rail and create more accessible, safe, liveable and improvements. sustainable communities within Banyule. There are also a number of state government policy The Victorian Infrastructure Plan includes a documents that are relevant to the development of The main strategic objectives of the BITP are commitment to updating the Victorian Cycling the GTMP. to support transport accessibility and mobility, Strategy and provision of infrastructure to ensure encourage active and public transport use, prioritise Plan Melbourne 2017-2050 is the current Victorian pedestrian and cycling safety. It also advises that sustainable transport modes before private vehicles metropolitan planning strategy that defines the Transport for Victoria (TfV) is currently preparing a on local streets, and advocate on transport issues to future shape of the Melbourne metropolitan area and 10 year plan to consider the costs and benefits of ensure the best outcomes for our communities. state. Plan Melbourne is a comprehensive planning transport infrastructure projects in Victoria. 14 The transport and movement The
15 Main Street / Grimshaw Street
Current Transport Issues There are many transport issues that currently need In addition, many signalised intersections within the addressing in Greensborough. These include poor activity centre prioritise vehicles over pedestrians. pedestrian and cycling facilities, through traffic Pedestrians have to wait for long periods of time to detracting from local amenity and poor bus to rail cross and the intersection layouts result in vehicles connectivity. moving through the intersections at speed. The natural undulating topography of Greensborough Pedestrian Environment also impacts the pedestrian experience, particularly The 20-minute walking catchment for for young children, the elderly and those with Greensborough covers the main retail, employment, restricted mobility. The topography also restricts line leisure and commercial core and as well as areas of of sight to key amenities such as Greensborough adjacent residential development. St Mary’s Primary Railway Station, reducing legibility. This is further School and Greensborough Primary School are compounded due to the absence of formal located within a 20 minute walk of the activity centre, wayfinding to assist pedestrians in locating key as well as areas of public open space (including places within the activity centre, including the railway Whatmough Park and Poulter Avenue Reserve). station and Centrelink. The walking catchment highlights the variety of amenities available to current and future residents, employees and visitors to Greensborough which can be easily accessed by foot. By nature of their design the majority of streets within the Greensborough Activity Centre prioritise the movement of cars and other vehicles. As a result the experience for pedestrians is poor and uninviting. A lack of places to cross busy roads safely and comfortably creates severance, isolating land uses on the fringe of the activity centre including Greensborough Railway Station. 16
Cycle Access The Principal Bicycle Network which provides connections via arterial roads to the northeast region Greensborough’s 20-minute cycling catchment and into the centre of metropolitan Melbourne extends to areas up to 3 kilometres from the activity remains incomplete resulting in wider access to centre, including Greensborough as well parts of the Greensborough Activity Centre being poor. Of Bundoora, Watsonia, Briars Hill and Montmorency. particular concern is the continued lack of access The catchment highlights the importance of from the Banyule Shared Trail along Greensborough developing a safe and connected cycling network Highway from Yallambie Road into Greensborough. to fully realise the potential of Greensborough as a The activity centre is located adjacent to the Plenty central shopping, employment and leisure hub for River Trail which forms part of a northern regional those wishing to travel by bicycle. trails network. This network is extensive with The local bicycle network has been improved over connection to major trails in the region including the past years with the recent introduction of a new the Main Yarra Trail and it provides a pleasant safe route to access Greensborough from Watsonia as experience for riders of all abilities. There are, well as signage and marking of routes from St Helena however, poor connections and missing sections in the north, and Yallambie in the south. There is, of trail needed as outlined in the Northern Regional however, a general lack of cycling facilities within the Trails Strategy. This includes a section of the rail trail activity centre, particularly for those who are less from Greensborough to Eltham which is currently confident cycling on-road and connections from missing. There is also a need for improvements in the the activity centre to the wider on-road and off-road quality of the trail which is currently in poor repair cycling networks remain poor. especially in the section of the Plenty River Trail close to Greensborough. The connection to the heart of Within the centre on-road facilities currently offer no the activity centre is also poor. level of separation or protection along streets heavily used by both cars and buses. This is also the case along Main Street even though it is specified as being part of the Principal Bicycle Network. This results in a high stress cycling environment, generally only accessible to more confident and experienced riders. 17
Bus and Rail Access substandard when compared to the wider Metro area. They do not meet the needs of the growing Greensborough Railway Station is on the Hurstbridge Greensborough Activity Centre or those of the wider railway line which runs to Hurstbridge from northeast region. Melbourne CBD and is an important gateway into the activity centre, providing the first impression of There are currently nine bus services that operate in the area for those arriving by rail. The experience for Greensborough. Whilst the number of bus services passengers is poor however, particularly for those bringing people in the heart of the activity centre has arriving by foot or bicycle. The current environment grown in recent years (a new bus route 343 between is considered uninviting and unsafe. Most critically, Greensborough and Hurstbridge via Diamond Creek the current access does not meet current Disability was added in June 2017) the routes and stops have Discrimination Act (DDA) requirements. not been fully reviewed to meet the current or future needs of the local community and surrounding Greensborough’s current 20-minute public transport region. catchment highlights clearly the key corridors served by bus and rail, with the catchment extending Greensborough Railway Station is disconnected beyond Greensborough to communities including from Main Street and suffers from poor levels of Montmorency, Briars Hill, Watsonia, Watsonia North, access via Para Road. The current interchange Bundoora and Macleod. on Para Road between bus and rail is unattractive and inconvenient, resulting in a poor passenger The catchment highlights areas currently poorly experience. In addition some bus services do not served by public transport, including eastern connect directly to the railway station and require Greensborough, which is located within a relatively a walk from disjointed locations around the activity short distance from the activity centre. centre to access a rail service. The location of some A number of major education facilities also currently bus stops within the activity centre is confusing, fall beyond the 20 minute catchment, including particularly for the route 293, the stops of which are Parade College, RMIT Bundoora Campus and La located in isolation to other services. Trobe University, as well as the La Trobe National The Main Street bus boarding and alighting area Employment and Innovation Cluster. in the town centre is equally of poor quality and The reliability and frequency of rail services to confusing for passengers. Waiting areas for and from Greensborough, due to single line track westbound services are narrow and uninviting. 18 between Greensborough and Eltham, is also
Impact of Through Traffic The current road network within the Greensborough Activity Centre does not deter through traffic. Through traffic is defined as traffic that travels through the activity centre without stopping. Through trips are undesirable as they add to congestion, impact air and noise quality and impact bus access without contributing to the activity centre in terms of the local economy and community. Whilst The Circuit and Para Road is the preferred route for through traffic, drivers favour Grimshaw Street due to time and distance savings. In addition some drivers favour Grimshaw Street and Diamond Creek Road rather than using Greensborough Highway and the Greensborough Bypass. Westbound through traffic accessing The Circuit is required to do so by using a short section of Main Street and Hailes Road. This segment is also one of the main pedestrian routes from Main Street to Greensborough Railway Station. As a result, the northern end of Main Street carries high volumes of traffic, making it difficult to cross and reducing the quality of the pedestrian experience. Preferred Transport Movements for the Greensborough Activity Centre 19
Summary of Transport Challenges The summary table below outlines key transport challenges in Greensborough and gives an indication of how upcoming State Government projects could contribute to the vitality of the activity centre through addressing the current challenges in and around Greensborough. These State Government projects are discussed in more detail in the following section. 20
Hurstbridge Rail Line Current Transport Challenges M80 Upgrade North East Link Duplication (Stage 2) Pedestrian • Lack of road crossing priority Facilities • Poor/narrow footpath provision • Lack of wayfinding signage • Lack of walking amenity including lack of rest areas and street landscaping • Lack of connectivity to open space Cycling • Lack of safe cycling facilities on and off road within the activity centre Facilities • Lack of connection to the Northern Regional Trail Network • Lack of connection to the Principle Bicycle Network Public • Poor mobility impaired access to railway station Transport • Lack of frequency of trains from Greensborough to Eltham • Poor bus connectivity to the railway station • Poor bus to bus connectivity • Poor connectivity from rail to cycle and walking facilities. • Lack of bus priority/ poor bus movement • Improvements needed to bus routes and operations including frequency of services. Traffic • High levels of through traffic Management • High speed environment in activity centre Table 2: . Current transport challenges in and around Greensborough 21
State Government Transport The transport and movement network supporting the activity centre is critical to the development of an accessible, safe, healthy and vibrant Initiatives community. It is fundamental in connecting people to jobs and goods to market. However, to date, very little investment in the transport and movement network has occurred in response to this growth. As a result, the transport network is facing increasing pressure to service both local and regional needs. The development of a number of strategic city shaping projects has the potential to fundamentally redefine the role that the activity centre’s transport and movement network plays within the broader region. These key projects include M80 Upgrade, Hurstbridge Rail Line Duplication and North East Link. The scale of these proposed projects presents a significant opportunity but also a potential risk in how the activity centre continues to develop as travel decisions are shaped by the changes in the M80 Upgrade transport network. The projects and their associated opportunities for Council are outlined in Table 3. Hurstbridge Rail Line Duplication North East Link 22
Project Opportunities Business Case Construction M80 • Managing through traffic. Complete 2019 - 2021 Upgrade • An improvement of bus movement. • An improvement to pedestrian and cycling safety and amenity. Hurstbridge • Provision of a high standard Greensborough Transport Interchange with full End 2017 2019 - 2021 Rail Line access for pedestrians and cyclists including those with mobility impairments. Duplication • A full bus review including routes, stop locations and services to (Stage 2) Greensborough. • Provision of adjacent rail cycle trail and connections to the wider bicycle network. North East • Managing through traffic. End 2017 2020 - 2026 Link • Reviewing the function of arterial roads around Greensborough. • Provision of a fully functioning Greensborough Transport Interchange (if not achieved through the Hurstbridge Rail Line Duplication). •Improvements to bus operations including new bus routes and improvements to existing bus routes and services. • Provision of cycling infrastructure. • Provide pedestrian, cycling and bus movement and priority across the North East Link. Table 3: . Summary of transport opportunities relating to upcoming state transport infrastructure projects 23
M80 Upgrade The Victorian State and Federal Governments have centre if heading north rather than continuing along In summary the potential benefits of the M80 project committed $700 million funding over the next 5 years Greensborough Highway. for the Greensborough Activity Centre include: to widen and upgrade three sections of the M80 Ring Providing additional capacity for northbound • A reduction of through traffic within the activity Road including the section between Plenty Road and movements on Greensborough Highway from centre; Greensborough Highway. The upgrade of this 2.4 Grimshaw Street passed the M80 interchange kilometre section is expected to be commence in • An improvement of bus movement into and will allow traffic to bypass Greensborough rather early 2019 and be completed by 2021. around the activity centre; and than opting for a through route. Combined with a The upgrade will provide significant benefit to reduction of right turning traffic into Grimshaw Street • An improvement to pedestrian and cycling safety freight and private vehicles. These benefits will it will also lead to improved bus movement into and and amenity within the activity centre. include improved east-west travel times along the out of the activity centre. It will also improve safety M80 as well as an improvement to the operation and amenity for pedestrians and cyclists along of the Greensborough Highway which is currently Grimshaw Street and within the activity centre. constrained by the operation of the M80 interchange. As such, Council has the opportunity to advocate for The upgrade to the Plenty Road to Greensborough VicRoads to consider including the reconfiguration Highway section will include widening the freeway of the Greensborough Highway-Grimshaw Street from two lanes to three lanes in each direction, intersection into the M80 scope of works to reduce and improvements to the Greensborough Highway the capacity afforded to right turning vehicles and interchange. increase the capacity for northbound traffic. Opportunities for Greensborough Activity Centre The M80 upgrade gives Council the opportunity to gain improvements to traffic conditions in the Greensborough Activity Centre. At present the amount of capacity afforded to northbound traffic at the intersection of Greensborough Highway with Grimshaw Street is constrained, with significant capacity provided to right turning vehicles. This, coupled with current delays at the M80 interchange, results in drivers favouring travel through the activity 24
25
Hurstbridge Rail Line Duplication (Stage 2) The $6.6 billion Victorian State Government Level Opportunities for Greensborough Activity Centre Crossing Removal program is currently underway This further work by the Level Crossing Removal across metropolitan Melbourne with the aim of Authority provides a valuable opportunity for removing a total of 50 level crossings. In Banyule, Council to advocate for enhanced public transport the Level Crossing Removal Authority are currently connectivity and improve pedestrian and cycling duplicating the Hurstbridge rail line between Rosanna facilities including: and Heidelberg, and in Rosanna are removing the crossing at Lower Plenty Road and constructing a • Provision of a high standard Greensborough new railway station. These works are expected to be Transport Interchange including improved complete in 2019. station facilities with full access for pedestrians and cyclists including those with mobility A second stage of the Hurstbridge Rail Line impairments; Duplication is currently in planning to duplicate the single track to double track between Greensborough • A full bus review including routes, stop locations and Eltham. The final completion date for this stage and services to Greensborough; is yet to be determined. These works will remove a • Provision of adjacent rail cycle trail as outlined. significant bottleneck in the current rail network and in the Northern Regional Trails Strategy simplify the rail timetable to a more frequent and (Greensborough to Eltham Link Trail); and reliable service to and from Melbourne, increasing the attractiveness of public transport use to and • Connections to the wider bicycle network. within Greensborough. 26
27
North East Link The Victorian State Government has committed $100 The new interchange at Grimshaw Street is little • Reviewing the function of arterial roads around million to complete planning and pre-construction more than one kilometre to the west of the heart of Greensborough; activities for the North East Link to close the Greensborough. • Improved integration of train and bus services freeway network gap between the M80 Ring Road in at a fully functioning Greensborough Transport Greensborough and the Eastern Freeway or Eastlink. The preferred primary route for through traffic Interchange (if this has not already been The North East Link Authority is developing the in the Greensborough Activity Centre is via The achieved through the Hurstbridge Rail Line business case which is expected to be complete by Circuit and Para Road, safeguarding other streets Duplication scope of works); the end of 2017. Tendering and detailed development for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport. are scheduled for 2018 and 2019 with the start of The preliminary demand analysis included in the • Bus operations including new bus routes and construction to begin in 2020. Project completion supporting documentation for the Victorian 30 Year improvements to existing bus routes and is expected in 2026. Whilst completion of this state Infrastructure Strategy shows some increases in services – particularly to improve access to key significant infrastructure is some time away, the traffic in and around the activity centre and some destinations including tertiary education and to planning and development of actions to safeguard decreases on certain road segments in the year 2046 other activity centres; Council’s transport and movement vision is needed when compared to a Base Case scenario for these • Improvement to cycling infrastructure including now. two potential routes. completion of the Principal Bicycle Network, The North East Link Authority has identified a corridor Opportunities for Greensborough Activity Centre Strategic Cycling Corridors and implementation for the Link that will run from the end of the M80 Ring of the Northern Regional Trails Strategy including The proximity of a major freeway interchange at this Road at Greensborough along the Greensborough the missing cycling link to Greensborough location has the potential to significantly increase Highway road reserve to meet the Eastern Freeway in (Banyule Shared Trail); and demand for through traffic within the activity centre Bulleen. It is proposed to include: without appropriate intervention. • Ensuring pedestrian, cycling and bus movement • Three new interchanges in Banyule at Lower across the North East Link is given high priority. This project provides opportunities for Council Plenty Road, Grimshaw Street and the M80 Ring to advocate to the State Government to provide Road; improvements to transport services around • A five kilometre, six lane tunnel beneath Banyule Greensborough to enhance the function of the Flats, the Yarra River, and Lower Plenty Road to activity centre. These include: emerge north of Lower Plenty Road; and • Managing through traffic associated with the • New and upgraded walking and cycling links from potential interchange on Grimshaw Street; the M80 to the Eastern Freeway and Yarra Trail. 28
29
Community Consultation Council has undertaken consultation with the Council has also undertaken community consultation local community over a number of years and the in the past to ensure that we have heard our expectations of the transport network continue to community’s views on transport issues. We have rise. held extensive consultation including two large Most recently a ‘Greensborough Transport community transport forum events in May and Opportunities’ consultation was undertaken in September 2017 to give Banyule residents the November 2017. The community and Greensborough opportunity to have their say on the North East Link. traders were provided with information and In particular we offered every household in Banyule the opportunity to attend a drop in session the opportunity to respond to a survey on the on the upcoming State Government transport proposed alignment of the North East Link following infrastructure projects that are likely to impact the State Government announcement of four on the Greensborough Activity Centre. Transport corridor options. Out of the around 9000 responses, opportunities were discussed including the 16% were from residents of Greensborough and importance of making sure that improvements to a further 24% from the immediate surrounding public transport, cycling and pedestrian services suburbs of Watsonia, Watsonia North, Bundoora, St and amenity are included in these projects. Over 70 Helena, and Montmorency. responses supported these aims. The response to this large transport infrastructure Council also undertook a quick snap-shot street project shows that the residents of Greensborough level community consultation in the Greensborough and surrounds have a strong interest in transport Activity Centre in August 2017. Twenty-six people issues that affect them. These respondents were were approached and asked about their transport found to have concerns around traffic congestion experience in Greensborough. A common response on main arterial roads and wanted the North East was that public transport improvements were Link to be built as quickly as possible while also needed. Key concerns related to inconvenient and having significant concerns regarding protecting unreliable public transport services, poor integration the environment. They also expressed a desire for and interchange between bus and rail, the impact of improved public transport services and improved traffic on the enjoyment of the activity centre, and cycling facilities. the poor wayfinding and navigation for those on foot or arriving by public transport. 30
Prior to this community consultation on transport issues was done in 2015 to inform the development of the BITP. Over 4000 responses were obtained at both public forums and via an online survey. Responses were obtained on a wide variety of transport issues but a strong desire for public transport service provision was evident with 94% of responders agreeing that Council needs to work “If you want to use the train service and the bus service, closely with State Government agencies to ensure it is difficult with lining up of the timetables, and also the provision of an accessible and reliable public getting from one to the other because unfortunately “Trains are so irregular and with cancellations” transport network. Easing congestion on arterial Greensborough is a very hilly area” roads, and safe walking and cycling routes and facilities were also common themes. The objectives of the GTMP have been developed in line with the needs and wishes of members of the local community and traders that have been expressed consistently across all recent consultation on transport issues. “It would be good to just syncronize everything a “Navigation is not easy” little bit better (public transport)” 31
Where to from here It can be seen from the previous sections on current transport challenges and community concerns that there are many improvements needed to enhance the functionality of the Greensborough Activity Centre and to ensure it realises its full potential. The actions and projects set out in this section describe how this could be achieved. A New Integrated Greensborough Transport Interchange PTV Bus Services Review A Movement and Place Investigation for Greensborough Local Transport Infrastructure Projects 32
33 Greensborough Walk
A New Integrated PTV Bus Services Review Greensborough Transport Interchange Bus and rail interchange is currently a challenge due The construction of an integrated facility would The activity centre is well served in terms of the to topography and position of the railway station also unlock a number of opportunities to improve number of bus services, however, accessing services in relation to the local road network. As a result accessibility and connectivity, including: is confusing for passengers. There is inconsistencies interchange between modes is confusing and does in terms of the number of services which stop on • Relocating the station, and/or station entrance Main Street and at Greensborough Railway Station, not provide a quality user experience. further west towards Main Street, improving and the number of connecting bus/rail services is The construction of an integrated transport the station’s relationship with the heart of the low. In addition, not all services stop at the same interchange, achieved through decking over activity centre; and location on Main Street. the railway station, would provide a much • Providing opportunities to include a new north- A review of bus services is paramount to improved passenger experience and solution for south pedestrian route, linking the activity centre reconsidering the reconfiguration of Para Road and Greensborough through: with areas to the north including Plenty River Main Street (see Local Infrastructure Projects) as well • Reducing transfer distances; parkland. the delivery of an integrated transport interchange. • Improving interchange legibility; An integrated transport interchange would also Council wish to work with Public Transport Victoria unlock development opportunities on the northern (PTV) to determine optimal solutions that align with • Removing low quality on-street bus stops on Para side of Para Road. the needs of the activity centre and local community. Road; As such, Council strongly advocates for the inclusion • Facilitating better coordination between bus of an integrated transport interchange as a key and rail services, providing seamless transfer element of the planning for the track duplication between modes; between Greensborough and Eltham. The estimated • Improving access for those with restricted cost of developing an integrated transport mobility by removing steep pedestrian ramps interchange at Greensborough would be in the order and replacing them with lifts and/or escalators; of $60M - $80M, depending on the final design and solution. • Creating a much improved gateway into Greensborough for public transport users. 34
35 Greensborough Railway Station
A Movement and Place Investigation for Greensborough In line with the road hierarchy philosophy contained The following street functionality should be taken Grimshaw Street currently carries excessive through within the BITP, all streets within the activity centre into consideration for Greensborough: traffic and provides poor local access functions to should provide priority for pedestrians, cyclists and facilitate movement of pedestrians, cyclists, and Flintoff Street currently plays an important public transport, with sole occupant private vehicles public transport. role in facilitating bus and pedestrian access the lowest priority. to Greensborough Railway Station, Plenty River The Circuit currently forms part of the arterial road Each street within the Greensborough Activity Parklands, Centrelink and the Medical Precinct which network, controlled by VicRoads, and provides for Centre provides a different function, facilitating the could be made more walking friendly. It is lacking in the movement of through traffic at 60 km/h. There movement of people and vehicles to varying degrees. cycling facilities. is very little pedestrian amenity and no bus routes The functionality of these streets will evolve over Main Street is the primary shopping strip of the currently use The Circuit. time, as the activity centre grows and changes to the activity centre, facilitating pedestrian movement wider transport network occur. and activity. Main Street forms part of the Principal The street functionality needed for Greensborough Bicycle Network but, although it has some reflects the Movement and Place framework cycling facilities, is not considered a safe cycling currently being developed by TfV. Movement and environment. It provides bus and taxi access into Place considers the role streets play as a destination the heart of the activity centre, which is particularly in their own right, as places we visit for leisure and important given the topographical constraints of the recreation, not just to move through. Movement and area and the need to provide safe and easy access Place is an evolution of Smart Roads which focussed for all members of the community. solely on movement and was originally developed by Para Road forms part of the arterial road network, VicRoads. controlled by VicRoads, and provides for the A full Movement and Place investigation is required movement of through traffic at 60 km/h. It also forms to fully realise the potential for the Greensborough part of the Principal Bicycle Network. Para Road Activity Centre to be an attractive amenable place to serves an important function in providing pedestrian be. Greensborough would make an ideal test case access between Main Street and Greensborough for TfV to showcase their new Movement and Place Railway Station and has bus stop facilities. planning tool. 36
37 Greensborough Walk
Greensborough Local Transport Infrastructure Projects 38
Local Transport Infrastructure Projects Para Road and the Para Road/ Flintoff Street • Upgraded bus stop facilities to include improved Improvements to this intersection are needed intersection shelter and seating; the facilitate pedestrian access and strengthen connections between the railway station and the Para Road provides the primary pedestrian • Reduced width of traffic lanes; heart of the activity centre. connection between Greensborough Railway Station • Localised footpath widening; and and Main Street. Additionally, bus stops providing Improvements to this intersection could include bus/rail interchange at Greensborough Railway • Bus lanes in either direction. increasing pedestrian storage space and the Station are located on Para Road. introduction of a pedestrian scramble (‘Barnes Para Road is an arterial road, in the control of Dance’) phase to provide all direction crossing. At present, both the pedestrian environment and bus VicRoads. Any changes would require approval from stop facilities are of low quality, and suffer from the VicRoads, as well as TfV and PTV who are responsible Para Road forms part of the arterial road network following challenges: for bus planning and operations. and is within VicRoads control. Any changes to the intersection would therefore require their full • Para Road is wide and encourages high traffic The cost of upgrading Para Road, between Main approval. The cost of improving the intersection for speeds; Street and Flintoff Street, is estimated to be in the pedestrians is estimated to be in the order of $1M - order of $1M – $1.5M, depending on the final design • Existing footpaths are narrow; and $1.5M. solution. • Bus stop facilities are poor including lack of The Para Road/ Flintoff Street intersection forms quality shelter and seating. part of the primary south-west pedestrian entrance Whilst Council considers the development of an to Greensborough Railway Station, providing the first integrated transport interchange as key to delivering impression of Greensborough for rail passengers. an efficient, reliable and high quality public transport The current experience for pedestrians is poor. system for Greensborough, improvements to Para Footpaths on both sides are narrow, including Road are considered an interim measure to improve pedestrian waiting areas. These areas become access and the experience for pedestrians and crowded and pose a safety risk particularly during public transport users. peak times when large numbers of commuters travel The reconfiguration would apply to Para Road, from the railway station to the activity centre. In between Main Street and Flintoff Street, and include: addition no crossing is provided on the south east arm and traffic speeds appear high, due to the width of Para Road. 39
Main Street - The Circuit - Hailes Street One Way It is proposed that the loop be removed and a • The intersection is considered oversized for a Loop Reconfiguration standard two-way intersection with The Circuit and standard left in left out arrangement providing Para Road be created. local access. Vehicles currently heading westbound via Para Road and The Circuit do so via Hailes Street. This This will allow for the reconfiguration of Main Street Council has investigated a number of options to convoluted arrangement discourages through traffic between Hailes Street and The Circuit to better fit the reduce the size of the intersection, whilst banning from using Para Road and The Circuit, the preferred form and function of the remainder of Main Street, right turns out of Grimshaw Street and discouraging traffic route. as well potential redevelopment of Hailes Street through traffic to use Grimshaw. Options include: towards a more place oriented design. In addition this arrangement bookends the northern • Signalisation; and end of Main Street, providing in a vehicle dominated The estimated cost of reconfiguring the loop is • Installation of a reduced size uncontrolled environment at one of the major gateways into the estimated to be in the order of $1.8M, depending on left in left out with improved pedestrian heart of the activity centre. As a result: the final design solution and land acquisition costs. crossing. • Pedestrian access to Greensborough Railway Grimshaw Street – Para Road Intersection Without appropriate intervention these issues are Station is poor, as pedestrians have to traverse The current intersection of Grimshaw Street and Para likely to be exacerbated with the addition of North through a highly vehicle dominated environment; Road includes uncontrolled left turn lane from Para East Link. • The parcel of land in the centre of the loop, Road. This arrangement impacts the activity centre in The cost of providing a more compact left in left which offers retail and dining, is isolated from the a number of ways. out intersection is estimated to be in the order of main shopping strip by high traffic volumes; • The current left turn lane is sweeping and $500,000 - $800,000. • The effective length of Main Street as a quality provides a high speed solution for entering retail, hospitality and place focussed strip is Grimshaw Street. As result the design reduced by approximately 60m; and encourages vehicles to use Grimshaw Street as a through route, rather than using Para Road and • Opportunity for Hailes Street to function as a The Circuit; quality place is lost to large volumes of high speed (60 km/h) traffic. • The intersection arrangement provides a poor crossing experience for pedestrians travelling Without appropriate intervention these issues are along Para Road. The speed of free flow vehicles likely to be exacerbated with the addition of North accessing Grimshaw Street also raises safety East Link. concerns for pedestrians; and 40
Grimshaw Street – Walking, Cycling and Bus Key design features for Grimshaw Street include: Grimshaw Street – Main Street Intersection Priority (Between The Circuit and Para Road) • Reducing the cross section to one traffic lane in The intersection of Main Street and Grimshaw Street Whilst The Circuit and Para Road is the preferred each direction; bookends the southern end of Main Street and is primary route for through traffic, drivers currently a major pedestrian gateway into the heart of the • Introducing separated on-road cycle lanes in favour Grimshaw Street due to time and distance activity centre. either direction; savings. Without appropriate intervention this is likely The current intersection footprint is overly large to be exacerbated with the addition of North East • Introducing bus lanes between The Circuit and provides a poor experience for pedestrians. Link. and Flintoff Street to facilitate public transport The sweeping left turn slip lanes result in high traffic access; In addition, the current cross section prioritises speeds through intersection, reducing perception vehicles and is a barrier to pedestrian movements. • Utilising design measures to passively calm of safety for pedestrians, despite provision of zebra Wide traffic lanes, along with a straight alignment and traffic speeds including narrowing lane widths crossings. long unobscured sight lines, visually communicate a and planting of street trees to create a boulevard; The signal cycle time is also long, creating lengthy high speed road environment, while a lack of central and wait for pedestrians wishing to cross Grimshaw median makes it difficult for pedestrians to cross, • Installation of safe uncontrolled pedestrian Street. The amount of time allocated to east and unless using a signalised crossing facility. crossings between signalised intersections. westbound traffic also encourages through traffic to The reallocation of underutilised road space use Grimshaw Street rather than The Circuit. The cost to downgrading Grimshaw Street through allocated to cars for new and different functions such these measures is estimated to be in the order of Removing the left turn slip lane and narrowing the as landscaping, cycling or walking is proposed. $4M - $5M, depending on the final design solution. throat to Main Street would provide a much improved experience for pedestrians and free up space for allocation other uses, including landscaping. Grimshaw Street is an arterial road, in the control of VicRoads. Any changes would require approval from VicRoads. The cost of reconfiguring the intersection is estimated to be in the order of $500,000 - $800,000. 41
Main Street Bus Stop Reconfiguration The current bus stop arrangement provides for the Greensborough Activity Centre Pedestrian addition of on-street car parking bays on Main Street. Wayfinding Strategy While the existing contra-flow bus facility on It is recognised that short term on-street car parking Main Street is efficient from a traffic movement The activity centre is relatively large with key is critical to the livelihood of many of the businesses perspective, it does have a number of drawbacks amenities spread out across the area. The lack of a located on Main Street. As such, it is a priority that which impact the overall operation and user legible grid street network and reduced sight lines the future design look to accommodate a similar experience: due the undulating topography make wayfinding for number of on-street bays. pedestrians challenging. In addition, some streets • The contra-flow arrangement forces dependant This project would require of review of bus such as Greensborough Walk are elevated due to bus operation (i.e. one bus cannot pull out operations, as identified earlier, in order to topography, adding to confusion and reducing the behind another stationary bus) in the westbound consolidate bus bays. This project has been attractiveness of walking within the activity centre. direction; identified as a stand-alone project but could also To date Council has installed wayfinding totems at • The central boarding area is narrow providing for be provided as a package of works to support the the entrance to Greensborough Walk. The expansion a poor user experience; development of the integrated transport interchange of this wayfinding infrastructure throughout the as it relates to the overall improvement of public • The contra-flow arrangement is confusing for activity centre will assist pedestrians accessing key transport access in Greensborough. pedestrians with the risk that a pedestrian may amenities. The wayfinding strategy also provides step into the path of a vehicle approaching from Any changes would require approval from TfV and opportunities to sign the most appropriate routes to the contra-flow direction; and PTV who are responsible for bus planning and destinations, taking into consideration topography operations. and the pedestrian environment. • The large extent of pedestrian fencing, necessary to prevent pedestrians crossing through The cost to replace the current contra-flow system The cost of strategy development and roll out of the relatively complex traffic management with standard kerbside bus bays is estimated to be signing is estimated to be in the order of $500,000 - arrangement, is visually unappealing and signals in the order of $3M - $4M, depending on the final $1M. a vehicle dominant environment. design solution. A key project is therefore the removal of the contra- flow arrangement and creation of new standard kerb side bus bays on south side of Main Street. This project will see Main Street returned to a single lane in each direction and reallocation of road space to pedestrian use. 42
You can also read