Forest-based Bioeconomy: research in RTU - Dagnija Blumberga Riga Technical university
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Forest-based Bioeconomy: research in RTU Dagnija Blumberga Riga Technical university Institute of Energy Systems and Environment 09.03.2017. 1
Bioresource use pyramid New product. Friendly to environment and climate. Socioeconomically and economically valid. MACROECONOMIC ADDED VALUE DEVELOPMENT New ecologically valid product New economically valid product New product Extraction of energy sources Combustion Waste disposal 2
Methods used in the study • Scientific literature research Information collection and handling • Surveys results Innovative products multi-criteria • Criteria selection and determination of weights (importance) analysis • Product selection • Potential size of the market Market sales analysis • Innovative product’s price Eco-design analysis of three • Determination of product’s effect on climate and environment innovative products System dynamics model – economic • System dynamics model for determination of product’s added value and determination of organizations profit in time analysis of three innovative products • Challenges and possibilities Recommendations and conclusions • Questions for further research Rīgas Tehniskā universitāte 3
Sources of information Information given by involved scientific institutions Scientific publications and studies Scientific literature Patent database (Espacenet) Organizations experience Statistical databases Other publically available, trustworthy information 4
Wood resources available for forestry (LSF data) Unprocessed wood for export: – paper wood 1,6 mil. m3; – woodchips and firewood 1,4 mil. m3. 5
Multi-criteria analysis 6
Products included in multi-criteria analysis Power industry 16. ICLT - interlocking cross laminated timber panels 1. Butanol 17. Wood fibre composite material floor 2. Biodiesel 18. Glass fibre / wood flour thermoplastic composite 3. Bioethanol material 4. Bio-oil 19. Wood – plastic composites Textile industry 20. Dendrolight cell material (MeKA*) 5. Ioncell-F 21. Thermal insulation material from needles (RTU 6. Lyocell IESE) 7. Viscose Other new products with high added value Food production industry 22. Nanocrystallic cellulose 8. Vanillin, lignin, ethanol un cellulose 23. Suberin-acid salts 9. Fish food additive from microorganism 24. Suberin as cohesive substance (LSIWC) proteins 25. Lignin polymers 10. Bird and animal food from pine and 26. Nanocellulose film fir needles (SILAVA / BIOLAT) 27. Activated coal as sorbent (LSIWC) 11. Lignan 28. Xylan Biocomposite materials un building materials 29. Starch 12. Nanocellulose cement 30. Furfural (LSIWC) 13. Transparent wood 14. Cellulose cotton wool 15. Wood foam thermal insulation *Forest and Wood Products Research and Development Institute (MeKA) 7
Multi-criteria analysis matrix. An example Criteria Product A Product B Product C Product D No. x1 x2 x3 x4 1 Production development stage 5 3 5 4 2 Wood resource consumption amounts 4 2 4 4 3 Product market 5 4 5 5 4 Complexity of technological process 3 2 4 5 5 Specific water consumption 2 3 5 3 6 Specific electricity consumption 2 3 1 4 7 Specific thermal energy consumption 2 4 1 2 8 2 5 5 3 Waste and residue amounts from production By-products, that can be produced 9 3 5 2 4 simultaneously from this material flow 10 3 5 1 4 CO2 emission amounts from production Product effects on natural environment (air, 11 3 4 2 4 water, soil, climate, living organisms) 12 Product effects on human health 3 4 1 4 Product compliance to eco-design base 13 4 3 2 5 principles 14 1 2 1 3 Necessary investments to start production Riga Technical university 8
Results of multi-criteria analysis: TOP 10 products with highest commercialization potential Multi-criteria Product Ranking analysis result Biodiesel 0,829 1 Bio-oil 0,813 2 Lyocell (textyle) 0,767 3 Suberin as cohesive substance 0,710 4 ICLT – interlocking cross laminated 0,701 5 timber panels Xylan 0,689 6 Fish food additive from 0,650 7 microorganism proteins Suberin-acid salts 0,596 8 Transparent wood 0,587 9 Cellulose cotton wool 0,584 10 9
Products for further commercialization potential study IESE recommendations LSF selection Biodiesel from bio-oil Bio-oil Lyocell (textile from wood) + fish food additive from Lyocell (textile from wood) microorganism proteins Xylan Suberin as cohesive substance 10
TOP 3 products commercialization potential further study Products effects on climate policy goal achievement Available resources amount for production Eco-design analysis Potential market and price study Economic analysis 11
Product manufacturing technologies 12
Xylan (xylite) production technologies heat electricity water Birch wood procurement Birch wood cutting into woodchips (1) ▪ Main raw materials: Woodchip drying 2) – woodchips; Woodchip milling (3) – hydrochloric acid; Dust removal by sifting (4) – Milled woodchip heating in ammonium hydroxide; acid (5) – water; Cooling (6) – Swelling (7) sodium hydroxide. Sifting (8) Washing (9) ▪ Biggest effects on Heating (10) environment: Preparation for extraction (11) – electricity; «Microwave» extraction (12) – use of chemicals. Filtering (13) Sitting (14) Centrifuge (15) 13 Product preparation (16)
Bio-oil production technologies heat electricity water Wood extraction ▪ Main raw materials: Chipping (1) – woodchips. Woodchip drying (2) ▪ Biggest effects on environment: Woodchip milling (3) – electricity; – heat; Pyrolysis (4) – woodchips. Cyclone (5) Hard fraction Cooling/condenser (6) Storage (7) 14
Lyocell production technologies heat electricity water Non-coniferous wood extraction Cellulose preparation (1) Cellulose chemical dissolution (2) Spinning (3) NMMO Washing (4) ▪ Main raw materials: – wood; – NMMO; Processing (5) – oxygen; – ozone. Drying (6) ▪ Biggest effects on environment: Product (7) – electricity; – heat. 15
Eco-design analysis 16
Eco-design (I) Eco-design is a Environm systematic method to ent develop goods and Aesthetics Functionality services, that could improve Products Ergonomics Quality sustainability by design decreasing products effects on Suitability for Safety production environment in a Price whole life cycle. 17
Selected products effects on environment modelling with program ECO-it ▪ ECO-it numerically evaluates effects on environment created by each material and process. ▪ Selected production amount for each products is 1 ton. ▪ To make productions mutually comparable, identical energy resources and transport were chosen: – transport (load >32 t), tkm − CO2 eqv. 0,117 kg, mPt 14,0; – electricity (fossil), kWh − CO2 eqv. 0,594 kg, mPt 59,9; – heat (firewood), MJ − CO2 eeqv. 0,006 kg, mPt 3,61. ▪ ECO-it materials and process database is limited. For example, co-generation is not offered. 18
Results of eco-design analysis Xylan Bio-oil Lyocell CO2 eqv./t CO2 eqv./t CO2 eqv./t Electricity 3,00 0,05 3,10 Heat 0,10 0,05 0,17 Chemicals 0,73 0,00 0,02 Woodchips 0,19 0,04 0,04 Total 4,02 0,14 3,34 ▪ Smallest effects on environments are created by bio-oil production. ▪ Electricity consumption dominates analysed products effects on environment, that can be explained by a fact that it is impossible to choose co-generation as electricity source. ▪ CO2 eqv. method evaluates water effects as zero, therefore it is zero for all products independent of consumed water amounts. 19
Economic analysis 20
System dynamic model blocks Biooil Production Costs, Revenues, t/yr and Profit for Biooil Bioellas razosanas potencials - Copy 930 Auxiliary_167 - Copy Kopejais pardotais Auxiliary_168 - t/yr 925 Biooglu izstrades apjoms - Copy Copy Bio e lla s ra zo sa na - C o py Velamais mitrums - apjoms - Copy Ko pe ja is pa rdo ta is a pjo m s - C o py Copy 920 Bioellas razosana - Copy Bioellas izstrades 930 Pirolizes apjoms - Copy Bioogles - Copy Ievaditas koksnes gaze - Copy Eksporta dala - 915 mitrums - Copy Copy Pardosanas vieteja 925 Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2026 Aizvaditais mitrums tirgu - Copy - Copy Non-com m ercial us e only! CumRevenuesFrom # Biooil - Copy 3 Profit Biooil - Copy 3 RevenuesFrom 920 Biooil - Copy 3 Koksnes Pirmsapstrades Pirolizes Sarazota # krajums - Copy iekartas - Copy iekarta - Copy Bioella - Copy Sagadatais koksnes Ievaditais koksnes Koksne ar mitrumu Bioellas razosana - Eksports - Copy Kopejais pardotais Bioellas razosana - daudzums - Copy daudzums - Copy 10% - Copy # Copy 915 Final product price apjoms - Copy ProductCosts birch Copy veneer - Copy 5 Income, increase Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2021 Ja n 1, 2026 Ja n 1, 2031 annual profit per Non-com m ercial us e only! unit Biooil - Copy 3 Capacity in operation CumProductionCosts Pieejamais koksnes daudzums - Copy Iespejamais apstrades apjoms - Copy Production process Biooil - Copy Bioellas razosana - Copy Total Biooil energy - Energy content in Copy Auxiliary_121 - Copy Necessary energy for heating - Copy # # Rate_18 - Copy 4 Biooil Price - Copy annual profit Biooil - Copy 3 expenses, Biooil - Copy 3 Biooil - Copy Constant_15 - Copy UnitCapCosts Biooil steps w ood chips from UnitProdCosts Biooil - Copy 3 production process 3 - Copy 3 Ievaditas koksnes Velamais mitrums -Bioellas izstrades transfer from solid Transfer from solid m3 to loose m3 m3 to tonne - Copy mitrums - Copy Copy apjoms - Copy Total energy Total energy content in w ood - content in dried Copy w ood - Copy Bioogles - Copy Pirolizes Energy content in Biochar - Copy Total Biochar energy - Copy Total residue energy - Copy Auxiliary_159 - Copy 100 80 60 Rate_49 - Copy 3 profit Level_20 - Copy 3 Labor costs Biooil - Copy 3 # Biooil variable costs Cap ital costs -Biooilr p roduction - Cop y 3 gaze - Copy Total Pyrolysis gas # - Copy 3 Potencials Razosanas energy - Copy 40 izmantosanai - potencials - Copy Energy content in energy costs Biooil - t/yr Copy Pyrolysis gas - Copy 20 OtherProdCosts Copy 3 Electricity tariff Biooil - Copy 3 # 0 80,000 Auxiliary_166 - (EUR /yr)/yr pe r yr² Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2021 Ja n 1, 2026 Ja n 1, 2031 Copy 3 60,000 Non-com m ercial us e only! Auxiliary_169 - C a pa city in o pe ra tio n Bio o il - C o py Copy 3 (t/yr)/yr 1,000,000 w ood costs - Copy 40,000 P o te ncia ls izm a nto sa na i - C o py Ievaditais koksnes 4 daudzums - Copy rate Biooil - Copy 3 C a pita l co sts - incre m e nt ra te Bio o il - C o py 3 Average electricity Decommissioning 93.0 consumption Biooil - 20,000 C a pita l co sts - disca rd ra te Bio o il - C o py 3 500,000 Copy 3 92.5 Finances and Investments for Biooil heating costs for Ja n 1, 2016 Infrastructure Ja n 1, 2021 and Ja n 1, 2026 Technology Ja n 1, 2031 for Biooil production Economic lifetime W ood chips price - Biooil production - Non-com m ercial us e only! 92.0 Biooil - Copy 3 Labor requirement and wages for Biooil Rate_34 - Copy 6Copy 3 Copy 3 Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2026 Final product price Capacity in operation increase EUR /yr pe r Non-com myr ercial us e only! Commissioning rate Biooil - Copy Decommissioning # initial 91.5 t/yr fraction Razosanas Potencials Biooil - Copy 3 rate Biooil - Copy 3 Bioellas razosana - Biooilr production - installed capacity potencials - Copy izmantosanai - 2016 Ja n 1, Ja n 1, 2021 Ja n 1, 2026 Ja n 1, 2031 Copy Biooil - Copy 3 Copy 2,000 Auxiliary_169 - Copy Workforce, 39,600 Capital costs - Non-com m ercial us e only! 2.40 # Discount rate Biooil Capacity under - Copy 3 Ie va dita is k o k sne s da udzum s - C o py Average heating 2.39 Production construction Biooil - 1,500 Bio e lla s ra zo sa na - C o py Capacity in operation 39,300 Labor costs Biooil - consumption Biooil - Copy 3 Capacity order rate Copy 3 Commissioning rate Decommissioning Biooil - Copy Copy 3 Copy 3 2.38 Biooil - Copy 3 Biooil - Copy 3 rate Biooil - Copy 3 Capital costs -Biooilr New Capacity for production - Copy 3 Biooil - Copy 3 Capital costs - Capital costs - 1,000 2.37 expenses increment rate discard rate Biooil - Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2031 # Copy 3 Biooil - Copy 3 Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2031 Investments and Non-com m ercial us e only! 2.36 Adjustment for 3 Non-com m ercial us e only! capacities capacity under Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2026 Labor for Biooil heating tariff w ood - construction Biooil - production - Copy 3 Copy 4 Non-com m ercial us e only! Copy 3 Increase in Labor Decrease in Labor Rate_14 - Copy 4 Avg construction fraction increase Requirements Biooil Requirement Biooil - time Biooil - Copy 3 Avg lifetime of labour salary Cummulative - Copy 3 Copy 3 t/yr technology Pyrolysis Constant_1 - Copy reactor - Copy 3 Investment rate in investment in capital 92,500 technology - Biooil technology Biooil - construction Biooil 4 Desired capacity Copy 3 Average salary Biooil Desired capacity in production - Copy 3 - Copy 3 fraction increase under construction Capacity under 92,000 operation Biooil - Rate_3 - Copy 4 heating tariff w ood Biooil - Copy 3 Necessary labor Labor Requirements Copy 3 Cap acity order rate Biooil requirement Biooil Biooil - - Copy 3 Desired order rate Adjustment for Copy 3 91,500 Biooil - Copy 3 - Cop y 3 Specific investment capacity in - Copy 3 Annual w ages Biooil operation Biooil - in technology Biooil - Copy 3 investments Copy 3 - Copy 3 91,000 # Initial labor New Labor (t/yr)/yr ? requirement Biooil - requirement ? Auxiliary_19 - Copy EUR /yr pe r yr rate Biooil - Copy 3 Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2026 30,800 Copy 3 capacity Biooil - Effect of production Auxiliary_69 - Copy 4 added value Bioellas razosanas Commissioning rate annual profit Biooil Non-com m ercial us e only! Copy 3 on labor Step for capacity 4 Plyw ood - Copy 4 1,640 Commissioning potencials - Copy 30,700 Biooil - Copy 3 requirement - Biooil Biooil - Copy 3 (t/yr)/yr (t/yr)/yr 30,600 - Copy 3 Capacity in Reference Capacity Capacity order rate 30,800 1,630 Desired order rate 30,800 Biooil - Copy 3 operation 30,500 fraction running fraction profit 30,700 adjustment time 100 1,500,000 fraction capital fraction labour costs costs Plyw ood - Plyw ood - Copy 4 - Copy 3 30,700 30,400 Biooil - Copy 3 Biooil - Copy 3 Biooil - Copy 3 1,620 costs Plyw ood - Plyw ood - Copy 4 Copy 4 30,600 30,600 Copy 4 30,300 80 30,500 30,500 annual profit per Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2026 1,000,000 1,610 60 unit Biooil - Copy 3 30,400 30,400 Non-com m ercial us e only! Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2026 30,300 Non-com m ercial us e only! 40 30,300 ? 500,000 Auxiliary_110 - Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2026 Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2026 20 UnitCapCosts Biooil Copy 4 Non-com m ercial us e only! - Copy 3 Non-com m ercial us e only! 0 0 Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2021 Ja n 1, 2026 Ja n 1, 2031 Ja n 1, 2016 Ja n 1, 2026 Non-com m ercial us e only! Non-com m ercial us e only! added value per Electricity Consumption for Biooil production Biooil variable costs unit Plyw ood - Copy - Copy 3 4 Auxiliary_71 - Copy 4 Labor costs Biooil - Copy 3 Average electricity Commissioning rate consumption Biooil - Biooil - Copy 3 Copy 3 Capacity in operation Biooil - Copy Electricity, energy Perceived maximum efficiency-electricity Efficiency research Biooil - Copy 3 potential-electricity Biooil - Copy 3 Time to research - electricity Biooil - Copy 3 Heating Consumption for Biooil production Electricity efficiency Research rate - electricity Biooil - Average heating Electricity requirement of new Increase in electricity requirement Biooil - requirement Biooil - Copy 3 Copy 3 Decrease in electricity requirement Biooil - Copy 3 Decommissioning rate Biooil - Cop y 3 Electricity consumed Copy 3 Efficiency development potential - electricity Biooil - Copy 3 Copy 3 Heat, energy efficiency Commissioning rate consumption Biooil - Capacity in operation Biooil - Copy Perceived maximum efficiency-heat Biooil Efficiency research - Copy 3 potential-heat Biooil - Copy 3 Time to research - technology Biooil - for Biooil production - Biooil - Copy 3 heat Biooil - Copy 3 Copy 3 Copy 3 Average heating consumption Biooil - Copy 3 Development rate- Research rate - Average electricity electricity Biooil - Heating requirement heat Biooil - Copy 3 consumption Biooil - Copy 3 Biooil - Copy 3 Electricity Increase in heat Decrease in heat Current Efficiency - consumption rate Copy 3 requirement Biooil - requirement Biooil - electricity Biooil p roduction Bioellas razosana - production Biooil - Copy 3 Copy 3 Decommissioning rate Efficiency - Cop y 3 Copy Copy 3 Biooil - Cop y 3 development Current Efficiency - Time to develop- Heating potential - heat Biooil electricity Biooil electricity Biooil - requirement of new Heat consumed for - Copy 3 production - Copy 3 Copy 3 technology Biooil - Biooil production - Copy 3 Copy 3 Desired capacity in operation Biooil - Capacity utilization Copy 3 Biooil - Copy 3 Development rate- intial specific energy heat Biooil - Copy 3 Capacity in operation consumption Biooil - Current Efficiency - Biooil - Copy Copy 3 heat Biooil production Heat consumption - Copy 3 rate production Biooil - Copy 3 Required capacity addition Biooil - Bioellas razosana - Current Efficiency - Time to develop- Copy 3 Copy heat Biooil production heat Biooil - Copy 3 - Copy 3 Desired capacity in operation Biooil - Capacity utilization Copy 3 for Biooil - Copy 3 Capacity in operation Biooil - Copy Required capacity Auxiliary_165 - addition for Biooil - Copy 3 Copy 3 21
Input data for system dynamics model Selected Product production amount from Product capacities, used raw Product Capital t/year material, % price, €/t investments, €/t Lyocell 65 000 30,4 1 2 500 4 328 Bio-oil 30 000 70 2 190 600 Xylan 20 000 15 1 2 500 5 000 derivatives 1 – from input dry mass 2 – from input raw material with 10% relative moisture content Input data, that are taken into account: ▪ electricity and heat consumptions and tariffs; ▪ chemical amounts and expenses; ▪ workforce and it’s expenses. 22
Assumptions in system dynamic modelling ▪ raw material and end products price increase is 2% per year; ▪ payment increase for workforce is 3% per year; ▪ heat tariff increase is 1,5% per year; ▪ electricity tariff increase is 1,5% per year; ▪ economic lifetime for technologies is 15 years; ▪ investments discount rate is 7%. 23
Products relative expenses comparison 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Lyocell Bio-oil Xylan derivatives Workforce expenses Capital expenses Wood expenses Energy expenses Other expenses Chemical expenses 24
Profit showings comparison 600,00 60,00 Profit on used wood unit, €/m3 Profit on production unit, €/t 400,00 40,00 200,00 20,00 0,00 0,00 -200,00 -20,00 -400,00 -40,00 -600,00 -60,00 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 Lyocell profit (on t of production) Bio-oil profit (on t of production) Xylan profit (on t of production) Lyocell profit (on m3 wood) Bio-oil profit (on m3 wood) Xylan profit (on m3 wood) 25
Cascade type production unit ▪ Feasibilty study’s economic and effects on environment evaluation shows that it is necessary to develop product groups not individual products, that matches up with bioeconomy principles and increase income overall Biomass Use for energy production 1. end-product By-product use 2. end-product By-product use 3. Riga Technical university end-product 26
Potential market and price study 27
Potential market and price study Market appeal Competition advantages Product Price Local International Local International market market market market Lyocell 2,54 €/kg 69 % 80 % 27 % 47 % 46 % (natural) 58 % (natural) Bio-oil 9–15 €/GJ 67 % 73 % 27 % 31 % Xylan 6 €/kg - 67 % - 14 % (xylitol) 28
Market outlook - GE/ McKinsey matrix 99% Market attractiveness 66% 33% 0% 0% 33% 66% 99% Products competitive advantages Lyocell LV Lyocell EU Lyocell LV natural Lyocell EU natural Xylitol Europe Bio-oil LV Bio-oil Europe 29
Market study results summary ▪ Xylan (xylitol) can be obtained as by-product in other production processes, xylitol as sweetener has big competition. Complex product manufacturing possibilities or manufacturing of xylan as by-product should be evaluated. ▪ Bio-oil as fuel is possible to realise, if competition advantages are improved, but it is advised to evaluate products from bio-oil with higher added value. Bio-oil use can be put to further processing in products with higher added value, for example, biodiesel (transport), phenol (rubber factories), volatile organic acids (ice- cover preclusion), additives for pharmacy and food factories, etc. ▪ Lyocell shows positive commercialization possibilities in a segment of natural fibres. Total textile fibre segment should concentrate on international market. Before starting production and commercialization more detailed market study and analysis of business plan is necessary. 30
Additional research questions 31
Additional research questions Question groups 4. 1. Innovative 2. Environmen 5. Law and Innovative 3. Economic technologies questions t and regulations products climate questions questions 24 research questions are offered in a feasibility study 32
Conclusions 33
Conclusions (I) ▪ The golden string of LSF can be found in bioeconomy development of the forestry industry: there is a wide range of possibilities to increase price of forest resources in long term, by going step by step in exported forest resource processing in Latvia, by initializing (helping create) increased demand in local market and increased economic advantages of forest resource use. ▪ There are fields identified, where forestry industry organisations can work. It was done by evaluating three innovative products – textile from wood (lyocell), bio-oil and chemical products (xylan derivatives) commercialization possibilities. Separate manufacturing of one particular product, without using residues for manufacturing of other products with high added value, is not economically feasible in most cases and leave bigger effects on climate and environment. Therefore, it is suggested to evaluate manufacturing of these products in a complex system with other products (using by- products for manufacturing of other products) in detail. 34
Conclusions (II) ▪ Scientific institutions of Latvia are ready to carry out studies on manufacturing of innovative products from forest biomass, including development of new and effective technologies for globally known by- products, and their commercialization, but until now innovation development has been obstructed by: – lack of financial resources; – interdisciplinary cooperation nihility between different scientific institutions; – lack of studies that are oriented on results; – scientifically justified facts and trust, that there are adequate and suitable amounts of available bioresources in Latvia; – disregard of bioeconomy base principles. ▪ It should be continued to systematically develop innovative products and technologies commercialization possibilities by taking into account commercialization effecting factors (for example, not only economic and climate, but also political, resource and social, etc. factors) dynamic nature. 35
Recommendations 36
Recommendations (I) ▪ To develop organisation (JSC «Latvia’s State Forests») bioeconomy strategy, that would be a base for resource consolidation, research actions, product commercialization in short term and long term. ▪ Climate alignment. To help government institutions arrange climate politics questions, achieving support in carbon preservation innovative products methods acknowledgment and include these calculations in EU member states climate goals. ▪ Resource alignment. To make resource use study on non-coniferous wood, depending on species, use for products with high added value and on particular, incompletely used forest resource (for example, needles, barks) no residue use possibilities for manufacturing of different products with high added value. ▪ Manufacturing alignment. To make detailed studies on bio-oil, textile from wood and valuable chemical compound complex manufacturing possibilities in Latvia, including practical studies (development of technologies and prototypes) and business plan development for particular product manufacturing. To evaluate possibilities to establish biorefinery factory in Latvia, where forest biomass would be used as a main resource. To evaluate possibilities to renew cellulose production in Latvia for manufacturing of products with high added value, using innovative, environment and human health friendly technologies. 37
Recommendations (II) ▪ Environment alignment. To carry out a study on bioeconomy development effects on climate, environment and biodiversity, to define boundary conditions for different bioresources that can be collected from forest, without creating damages on climate, environment and biodiversity. ▪ To give an opportunity to representative of scientific institutions of Latvia to offer and for LSF to support local scientist created innovation development for forest biomass use to create product with high added value. To initialize scientists on result based research: for innovative products from forest biomass commercialization (from laboratory scale to product - TRL >7). ▪ Management alignment. Making of expert work group, including untraditionally thinking experts, for gradual and regular bioeconomy principles establishment in LSF. ▪ Development of information alignment, to (1) promote employer and forestry industry professional understanding and interest in sustainable forest resource use and (2) to advance society’s education and involvement in forest resource eco-effective use. 38
Contract executors ▪ Dr.hab.sc.ing. Dagnija Blumberga ▪ Dr.hab.sc.ing. Ivars Veidenbergs ▪ Dr.sc.ing. Jeļena Pubule, Gatis Bažbauers, Andra Blumberga ▪ Dr.sc.chem. Sarma Valtere, Kārlis Valters ▪ M.sc. Indra Muižniece, Lauma Žihare, Krišs Spalviņš, Karīna Bāliņa, Lelde Timma, Vladimirs Kirsanovs, Miķelis Dzikēvičs, Jeļena Ziemele ▪ B.sc. Raimonda Soloha, Armands Grāvelsiņš, Toms Prodaņuks, Vivita Priedniece, Līga Sniega, Antra Kalnbaļķīte Consultants: Indulis Brauners, Matīss Bičevskis, Andis Lazdiņš 39
You can also read