FACTSHEET HOST CITY ELECTION 2022 UPDATE - MARCH 2018 - Olympics
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
FACTSHEET
HOST CITY ELECTION 2022
UPDATE - MARCH 2018
On the evening of 31 July 2015, the President of opportunity for social, economic and
the International Olympic Committee (IOC), environmental development.
Thomas Bach, announced that Beijing would be
the host city of the Olympic Winter Games 2022. FROM APPLICANT CITY…
This announcement was the culmination of a two- A total of five cities 1 endorsed by their National
year process, which the IOC has developed over Olympic Committees (NOCs) submitted to the
a number of years to ensure that the city that is IOC their application files to host the Games of
elected is capable of hosting the Games, and that the XXIV Olympic Winter Games in 2022. These
the process is transparent for all involved. cities, in order of the drawing of lots, were:
Olympic Agenda 2020, the IOC’s strategic Krakow 2 (Poland), Oslo (Norway), Almaty
roadmap for the future of the Olympic movement, (Kazakhstan), Lviv 3 (Ukraine) and Beijing
was approved in December 2014 at the 127th (China). The application files provided the IOC
IOC Session. This allowed a number of the with an overview of each city’s vision, and
recommendations for the Candidature Process to concept for the Games and formed the basis for
be incorporated into the process for the Olympic an initial technical analysis of the bid.
Winter Games 2022. These changes included
cost savings to the Candidate Cities, an open … TO CANDIDATE CITY…
dialogue with the Candidate Cites and an
On 7 July 2014, in Lausanne, the IOC Executive
Evaluation Commission report focusing on the
Board (EB) accepted the following cities as
opportunities and challenges presented by each
Candidate Cities to host the XXIV Olympic Winter
Candidate City.
Games in 2022 (in order of the drawing of lots):
Oslo (Norway) 4, Almaty (Kazakhstan) and Beijing
HOST CITY ELECTION (China). The Candidate Cities submitted their
PROCEDURE FOR THE XXIV Candidature File and guarantees to the IOC by
the deadline of 7 January 2015. They were
OLYMPIC WINTER GAMES IN selected by the EB based on the technical report
2022 of an IOC-appointed working group. This Group,
which included representatives of various
Successful Games start with a vision that aligns
Olympic stakeholders such as the International
Games planning with the realities, needs and
Federations (IFs), the NOCs and the IOC
aspirations of the host city, region and nation. A
Athletes’ Commission, carried out a detailed
clear and realistic vision is an essential
technical assessment and made a thorough and
framework for developing a sustainable Games
detailed report highlighting the opportunities and
concept and venue plan from the earliest stages
challenges of each city. The Candidature Files
of a bid, to deliver outstanding Games and a
were analysed in detail by the IOC Evaluation
successful legacy. Bidding for the Games
Commission, which visited each Candidate City
presents an opportunity to create effective and
in February and March 2015. Following the visits,
efficient partnerships to deliver other major
the Commission issued a report, which was
projects, irrespective of the outcome of the
published to coincide with the “IOC 2022 Briefing
election. With the right vision, well-integrated
for IOC Members”. This report, which covered all
planning and effective follow-up, the Games can
technical aspects required to host the Olympic
be a powerful catalyst for positive change and an
Games, reflected the collective opinion of the
1 Stockholm was an Applicant City but dropped out before 3 Lviv withdrew its Application in July 2014.
submitting an Application File. 4 Oslo withdrew its Candidature in October 2014.
2 Krakow withdrew its Application in May 2014.
Page 1/6Commission members with expertise in a wide The biographies of the members of the
range of relevant subjects, including sport, evaluation commission are available here.
finance, sustainability, legacy, transport,
accommodation, energy infrastructure, legal ... THEN HOST CITY
requirements and marketing, and was provided The Candidate Cities delivered a number of
to the IOC Members to assist them in electing the presentations during the second phase of the bid
Host City. The Commission’s findings were process, and the final presentation was given on
presented under five main sections, (Vision and the election day to the IOC Members. The IOC
Concept, Foundation, Games Delivery, Members elected the Host City for the XXIV
Paralympic Games and Athlete Experience), with Olympic Winter Games during the 128th IOC
the main opportunities and strengths, as well as Session in Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), on 31 July
the main challenges, highlighted in each section 2015 (see details on next page). The newly
and subsection. The IOC Members and elected host city then signed the Host City
Presidents and Secretaries General of Contract with the IOC.
International Olympic Winter Federations also
had the opportunity, before the election, to VOTING REGULATIONS
participate in a two-day meeting with the
The vote took place by secret ballot. Any IOC
Candidate Cities (“IOC 2022 Briefing for IOC
member from a country whose city was a
Members”), where they received a full briefing on
candidate in the election had to abstain from
each city’s plan. This meeting took place in
taking part in rounds as long as the city was
Lausanne in June 2015. Following the adoption
included in the voting. For 2022 this was as
of Olympic Agenda 2020, and for first time, the
follows:
Evaluation Commission presented a report of its
key findings at the Briefing, and was available to
Number of IOC members at the time of the
answer Members’ questions. election: 102
Not voting in the first round:
IOC EVALUATION COMMISSION IOC President, Thomas Bach: 1
FOR THE XXIV OLYMPIC Nationals from Kazakhstan: 0
Nationals from China: 3
WINTER GAMES IN 2022 • Mr Zaiqing YU
The Evaluation Commission, appointed by the • Mrs Yang YANG
IOC President, was composed of IOC Members, • Mrs Lingwei LI
representatives of the IFs, NOCs, athletes and Number of members who were eligible to vote in
the International Paralympic Committee (IPC), as the first round: 98
well as advisors. The main task of this
Commission, chaired by Alexander Zhukov, was Honorary and Honour Members did not vote. In
to conduct an on-the ground analysis of the three each round, each participating IOC member
Candidate Cities and prepare a report with its could vote for only one city. The votes of
findings. The Commission visited each city to members not taking part in a round of voting or
verify the information presented; study the who abstained, as well as blank or spoilt
feasibility of the proposed plans; determine each electronic voting entries, were not taken into
city’s ability to deliver successful Games in 2022; account in the calculation of the required
and assess whether the Games would leave a majority. The city that obtained the majority of
positive legacy that met the individual needs and votes was elected. If, after the first round of
long-term development plans of the respective voting, no city had obtained the absolute majority
city and region.
Host City Election 2022 / 05 mars 2018 Page 2/6of the votes cast, as many rounds would be held committee and the respective authorities during
as necessary for a city to obtain such majority. the visits. At the same time, the IOC has to
respect the laws of a sovereign state.
AGENDA 2020 REFORMS
3) Introduction of a new evaluation criterion
Although the evaluation process for the 2022 entitled: “The Athlete Experience”. (Ref: Olympic
Olympic Winter Games was well underway when Agenda 2020, recommendation 2.) The Games
the IOC Session unanimously approved Olympic exist for the athletes. The first priority for any host
Agenda 2020 in December 2014, the reform city should be to put athletes at the heart of all
recommendations had a profound and positive Games planning and preparation, with the goal of
effect on the 2022 bid process. Both Almaty and providing the best possible platform for the best
Beijing embraced the spirit of Olympic Agenda possible performances.
2020 and its emphasis on legacy, sustainability
and cost containment. Both cities took steps to 4) The Commission benefitting from third-party
optimise their Games plans to manage costs and independent advice in such areas as social,
ensure positive, sustainable legacies. economic and political conditions with a special
Discussions in both cities during the focus on sustainability and legacy. (Ref: Olympic
Commission’s visits were collaborative, and Agenda 2020, recommendation 2.) In this
greatly benefited from the flexibility that Olympic respect, and in preparation for its visits, the IOC
Agenda 2020 brought to the host city selection commissioned a number of third-party,
process. Further changes to the 2022 bid independent reports on environmental issues,
process as a result of Olympic Agenda 2020 public opinion, transport, energy, security and
included: economic issues. The Commission also
considered the views of UN agencies and
1) The Evaluation Commission producing a nongovernmental organisations on issues
report that highlighted the risks and opportunities related to labour rights, media freedom and the
of each project with a strong focus on right to demonstrate.
sustainability and legacy. (Ref: Olympic Agenda
2020, recommendation 2.) 5) The IOC covering costs related to the 2022
Evaluation Commission visit that were formerly
2) Changes to the Olympic Charter with regard to paid by the Candidate City. (Ref: Olympic
workers’ rights, sexual orientation and Agenda 2020, recommendation 3, Reducing the
sustainability: Fundamental Principles of cost of bidding.) In addition to covering the travel
Olympism: “The enjoyment of the rights and and accommodation costs of its delegation, the
freedoms set forth […] shall be secured without IOC also paid for the hire and operation of the
discrimination of any kind, such as race, colour, Evaluation Commission conference room and
sex, sexual orientation, language, religion, technical facilities, including the set-up and
political or other opinion, national or social origin, design of the conference room.
property, birth or other status.” In addition, it is the
IOC’s role to ensure the Olympic Charter and all 6) Furthermore, throughout the 2022 bid process,
related rights and the Host City Contract are fully the IOC underlined the efforts it was making to
respected for the benefit of all Games manage the cost, size and complexity of
participants. As a result, the Commission organising the Games. The Commission urged
examined a number of potential risks and Candidate Cities to avoid going beyond Games
opportunities related to the principles and values needs by offering “nice-to-haves”.
of Olympism which go beyond purely technical
matters. These were discussed with each bid
Host City Election 2022 / 05 mars 2018 Page 3/6DEBRIEF seven years in advance of the future Games) has
As part of the IOC’s mission to continually become a major event in Olympic Movement
improve the bid process, the procedure is history.
constantly monitored and improvements made
where necessary. This includes a debrief with Election of Lillehammer (NOR) as host city for
each Candidate City and its NOC within a period the XVII Olympic Winter Games in 1994
of six-nine months following the election of the (during the 94th IOC Session in Seoul). Other
host city. This provides the delegations with a candidate cities: Anchorage (USA),
confidential forum to openly discuss their Östersund/Are (SWE), and Sofia (BUL).
thoughts on the bid process and to assist the IOC Round 1 2 3
in making improvements for the future. 1988 Anchorage 23 22 -
LEGACIES ACHIEVED THROUGH Lillehammer 25 30 45
BIDDING Östersund /Are 19 33 39
The IOC urges cities to maximise opportunities to
Sofia 17 - -
leave a positive legacy in the city and the region,
irrespective of the outcome of the vote, and the Election of Atlanta (USA) as host city for the
IOC has been able to note a wide range of bid Games of the XXVI Olympiad in 1996 (during
legacies being implemented by the cities and the 96th IOC Session in Tokyo).
their regions. Such legacies from recent bidding Other candidate cities: Athens (GRE),
cities include new general infrastructure and Belgrade (YOU), Manchester (GBR),
sports facilities, increased tourism as a result of Melbourne (AUS) and Toronto (CAN).
the promotion of the city and region and the Round 1 2 3 4 5
1990
promotion of Olympism and the Olympic values Atlanta 19 20 26 34 51
in schools as a result of the support of the
Athens 23 23 26 30 35
education sector, etc.
Belgrade 7 - - - -
2022 CANDIDATE CITIES: PAST Manchester 11 5 - - -
PARTICIPATION Melbourne 11 21 16 - -
Almaty
Toronto 14 17 18 22 -
• Games hosted: none
• Other candidatures: 2014 (Applicant City – Election of Nagano (Japan) as host city of the
XXII Olympic Winter Games) XVIII Olympic Winter Games in 1998 (during
Beijing the 97th IOC Session in Birmingham).
• Games hosted: 2008, (Games of the XXIX Other candidate cities: Jaca (ESP), Östersund
Olympiad) (SWE), Aosta (ITA) and Salt Lake City (USA).
• Other candidatures: 2000 (Games of the Round 1 2 3 4 5
1991
XXVII Olympiad)
Nagano 21 - 30 36 46
Jaca 19 - 5 - -
FORMER ELECTIONS
Östersund 18 - 25 23 -
Since 1994, following the change of cycle
between the Games of the Olympiad and the Aosta 15 29 - - -
Olympic Winter Games, the yearly alternating Salt Lake City 15 59 27 29 42
pattern of celebrating a Games and electing a
future host city during an IOC Session (usually
Host City Election 2022 / 05 mars 2018 Page 4/6Election of Sydney (Australia) as host city for Election of Turin (Italy) as host city for the XX
the Games of the XXVII Olympiad in 2000 Olympic Winter Games in 2006 (during the
(during the 101st IOC Session in Monaco). 109th IOC Session in Seoul).
Other candidate cities: Beijing (CHN) Berlin Other candidate cities: Helsinki (FIN),
(GER), Istanbul (TUR) and Manchester (GBR). Klagenfurt (AUT), Poprad-Tatry (SVK),
1999
Round 1 2 3 4 Sion (SUI) and Zakopane (POL).
1993
Round 1
Beijing 32 37 40 43
Berlin 9 9 - - Torino 53
Istanbul 7 - - - Sion 36
Manchester 11 13 11 -
Election of Beijing (People’s Republic of
Sydney 30 30 37 45
China) as host city for the Games of the XXIX
Olympiad in 2008 (during the 112th IOC
Election of Salt Lake City (USA) as host city for Session in Moscow).
the XIX Olympic Winter Games in 2002 (during Other candidate cities: Istanbul (TUR), Osaka
the 104th IOC Session in Budapest). (JPN), Paris (FRA) and Toronto (CAN).
Other candidate cities: Östersund (SWE),
Quebec (CAN) and Sion (SUI). Round 1 2
2001
Round 1 Beijing 44 56
1995
Salt Lake City 54 Istanbul 17 9
Östersund 14 Osaka 6 -
Sion 14 Paris 15 18
Quebec City 7 Toronto 20 22
Election of Athens (Greece) as host city for the Election of Vancouver (Canada) as host city
Games of the XXVIII Olympiad in 2004 (during for the XXI Olympic Winter Games in 2010
the 106th IOC Session in Lausanne). (during the 115th IOC Session in Prague).
Other candidate cities: Buenos Aires (ARG), Other candidate cities: PyeongChang (KOR)
Cape Town (RSA), Rome (ITA) and Stockholm and Salzburg (AUT).
2003
(SWE).
Round 1 2
Round 1 2 3 4 5
1997
Vancouver 40 56
Athens 32 - 38 52 66
Salzburg 16 -
Buenos
16 44 - - - PyeongChang 51 53
Aires
Cape Town 16 62 22 20 -
Rome 23 - 28 35 41
Stockholm 20 - 19 - -
Host City Election 2022 / 05 mars 2018 Page 5/6Election of London (GBR) as host city for the Election of PyeongChang (Republic of Korea)
Games of the XXX Olympiad in 2012 (during as host city of XXIII Olympic Winter Games in
the 117th IOC Session in Singapore). 2018 (during the 123rd IOC Session in
Other candidate cities: Paris (FRA), New York Durban).
(USA), Moscow (RUS) and Madrid (ESP). Other candidate cities: Munich (GER), Annecy
(FRA).
2011
Round 1 2 3 4
2005
London 22 32 39 54 Round 1
Paris 21 27 33 50 PyeongChang 65
Madrid 20 32 31 - Munich 25
New York 19 16 - - Annecy 7
Moscow 15 - - - Election of Tokyo (Japan) as host city of the
Games of the XXXII in 2020 (during the 125th
Election of Sochi (Russian Federation) as host IOC Session in Buenos Aires (Argentina).
city of the XXII Olympic Winter Games in 2014 Other candidate cities: Istanbul (TUR), Madrid
(during the 119th IOC Session in Guatemala (ESP).
2013
City). 1–tie
Other candidate cities: PyeongChang (KOR) Round 1 2
break
and Salzburg (AUT).
2007
Tokyo 42 60
Round 1 2
Istanbul 26 49 36
Sochi 34 51
Madrid 26 45
Salzburg 25 -
Election of Beijing (People’s Republic of
PyeongChang 36 47
China) as host city of the XXIV Olympic Winter
Games in 2018 (during the 128th IOC Session
Election of Rio (Brazil) as host city of the in Kula Lumpur (Malaysia). Other Candidate
2015
Games of the XXXI Olympiad in 2016 (during City: Almaty (KAZ).
the 121st IOC Session in Copenhagen). Round 1
Other candidate cities: Madrid (ESP), Tokyo
(JPN) and Chicago (USA). Beijing 42
2009
Round 1 2 3 Almaty 26
Rio 26 46 66
Madrid 28 29 32 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Tokyo 22 20 - • Current candidature process
• Further details on the 2022 process
Chicago 18 - -
IMPRINT
HOST CITY ELECTION 2022 March 2018
A publication of the For further information, please contact
Château de Vidy, The Olympic Studies Centre
1007 Lausanne, Tel. +41 021.621.66.67
Switzerland studies.centre@olympic.org
Host City Election 2022 / 05 mars 2018 Page 6/6You can also read
