ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 - europa.eu
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 28 February 2019 ESMA 50-165-750
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 2 ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 © European Securities and Markets Authority, Paris, 2019. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is cited adequately. The reporting period for this Report is 1 July 2018 to 31 December 2018, unless otherwise indicated. The reporting quarter for the Risk Dashboard in the Risk Section is 4Q18. Legal reference for this Report: Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC, Article 32 “Assessment of market developments”, 1. “The Authority shall monitor and assess market developments in the area of its competence and, where necessary, inform the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), and the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority), the ESRB and the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission about the relevant micro-prudential trends, potential risks and vulnerabilities. The Authority shall include in its assessments an economic analysis of the markets in which financial market participants operate, and an assessment of the impact of potential market developments on such financial market participants.” The information contained in this publication, including text, charts and data, exclusively serves analytical purposes. It does not provide forecasts or investment advice, nor does it prejudice, preclude or influence in any way past, existing or future regulatory or supervisory obligations by market participants. The charts and analyses in this report are, fully or in part, based on data not proprietary to ESMA, including from commercial data providers and public authorities. ESMA uses these data in good faith and does not take responsibility for their accuracy or completeness. ESMA is committed to constantly improving its data sources and reserves the right to alter data sources at any time. The third-party data used in this publication may be subject to provider-specific disclaimers, especially regarding their ownership, their reuse by non-customers and, in particular, their accuracy, completeness or timeliness, and the provider’s liability related thereto. Please consult the websites of the individual data providers, whose names are given throughout this report, for more details on these disclaimers. Where third-party data are used to create a chart or table or to undertake an analysis, the third party is identified and credited as the source. In each case, ESMA is cited by default as a source, reflecting any data management or cleaning, processing, matching, analytical, editorial or other adjustments to raw data undertaken. European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) Risk Analysis and Economics Department 103, Rue de Grenelle FR–75007 Paris risk.analysis@esma.europa.eu
ESMA Risk Dashboard R.1 Main risks Risk segments Risk categories Risk sources Level Outlook Level Outlook Outlook Overall ESMA remit Liquidity Macroeconomic environment Systemic stress Market Interest rate environment Securities markets Contagion EU sovereign debt markets Infrastructure disruptions, including cyber Investors Credit risks Infrastructures and services Operational Political and event risks Note: Assessment of the main risks by risk segments for markets under ESMA’s remit since the last assessment, and outlook for the forthcoming quarter. Assessment of main risks by risk categories and sources for markets under ESMA’s remit since the last assessment, and outlook for the forthcoming quarter. Risk assessment based on categorisation of the ESA Joint Committee. Colours indicate current risk intensity. Coding: green = potential risk, yellow = elevated risk, orange = high risk, red = very high risk. Upward arrows indicate an increase in risk intensities, downward arrows a decrease and horizontal arrows no change. Change is measured with respect to the previous quarter; the outlook refers to the forthcoming quarter. ESMA risk assessment based on quantitative indicators and analyst judgement. 4Q18 was characterised by increasing market nervousness and sensitivity amid global trade tensions, weakening growth prospects, reduced global monetary policy stimulus and political uncertainty in the EU. In this context in 4Q18, volatility on equity and sovereign bond markets increased, equity prices continued to decrease, repricing on corporate and sovereign bond markets continued, and regional developments led to localised sell-offs and increased short-selling activity. Market risk thus remains very high. Our outlook for liquidity, contagion and credit risk remains unchanged. Operational risk remains elevated with a negative outlook, as cyber threats and Brexit-related risks to business operations continue to be a major concern. Going forward, political and geopolitical tensions coupled with weakening growth prospects will likely be the main drivers of volatility. As the Brexit deadline approaches, concerns over a potential no-deal withdrawal increasingly weigh on economic and market expectations. Systemic risk as measured by the ESMA Risk summary version of the composite systemic indicator Market risk remained at a very high level in 4Q18, increased to high levels that have been unseen accompanied by very high risk in securities since early 2016. The largest contribution to the markets and elevated risks for investors, increase came from equity markets. infrastructures and services. Equity and bond R.2 volatility remained high, reflecting sensitivities to ESMA composite systemic stress indicator (CISS) events such as trade discussion and geopolitical Multi-quarter high, driven by equities tensions and the underlying risk of reversal of risk 0.6 premia. The level of credit and liquidity risk 0.4 remained high, with a deterioration in outstanding corporate debt ratings and still relatively low 0.2 corporate and sovereign bond liquidity. 0 Operational risk was elevated as cyber threats -0.2 and Brexit-related risks to business operations remained major concerns. Investor risks -0.4 Dec-14 Dec-15 Dec-16 Dec-17 Dec-18 persisted across a range of products and, under Equ ity mar ket con trib utio n Bon d market contribu tion the MiFIR product intervention powers, ESMA Money mar ket con trib utio n ESMA CISS recently extended the prohibition of binary Correla tio n contribu tion options and the restrictions on CFDs to retail Note: ESMA version of the ECB-CISS indic ator m easuring sys temic stress in investors. Going forward, EU financial markets securities markets. It foc uses on three fi nancial market s egments: equity , bond and money markets, aggregated through standard portf olio t heory. It is bas ed on can be expected to become increasingly securities market indicators such as volatilities and risk spreads. Sources: ECB, ESMA. sensitive to mounting political and economic uncertainty from diverse sources, such as global trade discussions, emerging market capital flows, Brexit negotiations and others. Assessing business exposures and ensuring adequate hedging against these risks will be a key concern for market participants in the coming months.
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 4 Risk sources EU sovereign debt markets: In 4Q18, EU sovereign bond yields were characterized by high Macroeconomic environment: Growth forecasts volatility during short periods of political have become more subdued, with downward uncertainty, especially in Italy. Ten-year revisions of the European Commission’s EU GDP sovereign yields decreased by 0.2 percentage growth forecast to 1.5% (down from 2.0%) in point on average, although with increases for GR 2019. Global economic growth has also been (+0.2 ppt). The Italian ten-year sovereign yield revised with projected GDP growth rates of 3.5% spread to the German Bund climbed above 300 for 2019). As regards global economic growth, bps several times during 4Q18, higher than at any the expansion has become less balanced and time since the euro sovereign crisis. downside risks to global growth have risen in the past six months and have become more Market functioning: Markets continue to be differentiated across regions.1 In the US, subject to technical issues as shown by the stronger-than-anticipated inflation initially recent delayed market opening of a German reignited investors’ fears of more aggressive trading venue (15 October). The number of interest-rate increases. However, in early 2019, circuit-breaker occurrences was similar to the US Federal Reserve put further interest rate long-term averages over the reporting period, rises on hold, citing downside risks to global with an average of 129 interruptions per week, growth. The macroeconomic environment and its and a peak at 295 during the second week of interaction with market expectations, notably over October (compared with a weekly average of 57 future monetary policy actions, played an active during 3Q18, R.35), potentially reflecting higher role in recent market sell-offs such as the October market volatility. Regarding market equity market price drop. This remains a infrastructures, central clearing continued to significant source of risk going forward. increase amid ongoing implementation of the Appreciation of the EUR against the USD clearing obligation for derivatives. Central continued – albeit at a slower pace – with clearing rates for all outstanding OTC credit divergences in monetary policies on both sides of derivatives grew from 25% to 27% in 2017 2. For the Atlantic. OTC IRDs, central clearing rates grew from 40% in 1Q17 to 58% in 4Q17. On 11 September, Interest-rate environment: Risks of a low following a large divergence in spreads between interest-rate environment now lie the pace of the Nordic and German power markets, a Norwegian quantitative easing tapering policies, in the EA power market trader clearing its own trades at and abroad. While search-for-yield behaviour by Nasdaq Clearing was not able to meet intraday investors and potential mispricing of assets margin calls and declared default. Its positions remain a concern in the short to medium term, were subject to a second auction process on market anxiety over signs of a reversal in risk 12 September and the cost of the default was at premia was reflected in the global equity sell-off the time covered by the default resources that in October. Risk premia on bond markets (both were available to the CCP including the sovereign and corporate) have started showing defaulter’s collateral, CCP’s own capital signs of risk reallocation. Ten-year EA sovereign (EUR 7mn) and default fund contributions of spreads to the DE Bund increased by 9 bps on non-defaulting clearing members (EUR 107mn). average in between the start and the end of 4Q18 (R.9) standing now at a relatively high level. Political and event risk: In the EU, the political risk Corporate bond spreads with respect to risk-free of a no-deal Brexit, and related developments rates (as measured by Euribor swap rates) both in the UK and in the EU remains the most increased significantly for all ratings (R.15), but significant risk. At the same time, discussions even more so for lower rated ones, a sign of around the IT budget saw short-lived market increased risk premia on these markets. Potential reactions, while tensions around potential future curbing of search-for-yield behaviour is also reforms in France might be a source of instability. reflected in the continued net outflows from most Globally, trade discussions between the US and fund categories in 4Q18 (R.25, R26). Event risk, China were an important driver of equity market for example related to potential escalation of volatility, while comments on the future stance of uncertainties in trade discussions is affecting US monetary policy authorities was followed by market expectations, thus weighing on the equity and bond market reactions throughout economic outlook and potentially changing 4Q18. anticipations around future monetary policy. In this environment, markets could be more vulnerable to risk premia repricing, hence our Risk categories continued deteriorating outlook for this risk. Market risk – very high, outlook stable: Equity market price decreased globally in 4Q18. 1 International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook 2 ESMA Annual Statistical Report – EU Derivatives Update, January 2019, and European Commission, Markets, 2018 Winter 2019 economic forecast.
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 5 Markets sensitivity to event risks remained high, This is usually a sign of differentiation between a as a sell-off in US equity markets (–5% in two set of core countries and a periphery on EU days) from growing trade tensions and sovereign markets. Market movements on Italian expectations of tighter US monetary policy sovereign bonds only moderately spread to other spread to other regions. EU equities fell heavily markets, showing signs of a high but contained this quarter (–13%). Volatility was high on equity contagion risk. Across sectors, the correlation (16% at end 4Q18, up from 8% at the beginning between equity sectoral indices started to of the quarter) and commodity markets (27% at increase again in 4Q18 (R.20). Finally, end 4Q18, up from 14% at the beginning of the interconnectedness between the non-banking quarter) this quarter, in what seems to be an end sector, in particular hedge funds, and the banking to the artificially low volatilities seen in recent sector remained at a relatively high level (R.29). years. Political developments in Europe, together Credit risk – high, outlook stable: In 4Q18, non- with geopolitical events and discussions over financial corporate bond spreads continued to international trade arguments were driving increase largely for lower-rated IG bonds (BBB) market volatility. On foreign-exchange markets, but also for other ratings, clearly showing signs of volatility was high in 4Q18 for the GBP, as Brexit risk premia adjustments. This mainly reflects a approaches, and for the USD amid a strong US repricing of risk given the growth slowdown and economy and expectations of further monetary political uncertainty in the context of ECB tightening from the Federal Reserve, although in tapering of corporate bond net purchases, which early 2019 the central bank signalled that it would ended in December. Spreads stood within a put further interest rate increases on hold. range of 179bps for BBB-rated securities to Against the EUR, the USD continued to 32bps for the AAA class, in comparison with the depreciate over the course of the quarter – albeit much narrower range of 66bps to 9bps at at a slower pace. As discussed in other sections, end-2017 (R.15). At the same time, the credit interest rate risk represents one of the main quality of outstanding corporate bonds continued to market risks in the future. deteriorate, albeit at a slower pace (R.17). Liquidity risk – high, outlook stable: Liquidity on equity markets, as measured by the ESMA Operational risk – elevated, outlook deteriorating: illiquidity index, started deteriorating during the ESMA recently identified several significant first half of 4Q18, only to return to its initial level investor protection and conduct risk concerns in at the end of the quarter (R.4). Sovereign bond the EU. Since 2 July 2018, there has been a ban market liquidity continued to recover from its very on the marketing, distribution or sale of binary low level of 2Q18, where it was affected by the options to retail investors, which was renewed on May sovereign market movements in the EU. 2 January 2019 for a further three months. In Spikes of illiquidity nevertheless occurred in addition, since 1 August 2018, CFDs have been October and December (R.11). On corporate subject to a restriction in their marketing, bond markets, the Amihud indicator recovered distribution or sale to retail investors, which has from September levels, signalling enhanced been renewed for a further three months, from liquidity; on the other hand, bid-ask spreads first 1 February 2019 onwards. Risks related to Brexit, decreased, before increasing again towards the and its uncertain impact on an array of complex end of the quarter. Trading volumes of centrally legal and regulatory issues, continue to pose a cleared repos were subject to seasonal significant operational risk to EU financial movements only in 4Q18, with long-term growth markets, for both investors and infrastructures, as of volumes appearing to slow down (R.13). the possibility of no agreement is significant. Collateral scarcity premia (i.e. the difference Regarding cyber risks, concerns are expected to between general collateral and special collateral intensify in the medium to long term, especially repo rates) increased in December. High levels of with respect to business continuity and the collateral scarcity premia reflect possible integrity of proprietary data as financial data shortages of high-quality collateral (R.14). This breaches are increasingly frequent in comparison may fuel liquidity risk and volatility in funding with breaches in other sectors (R.43.). Finally, the costs and reduce overall market confidence. dispersion of Euribor submission quotes decreased slightly in 4Q18 (R.41). Contagion risk – high, stable outlook: On sovereign bond markets, the median correlation between Germany and other EU countries’ bond yields was high in 4Q18, while the dispersion between Member States has widened (R.19).
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 6 Securities markets R.3 Risk summary Risk drivers – Reversal of risk-premia Risk level – Political risk Risk change from 3Q18 – Geopolitical and event risks, especially Brexit Outlook for 1Q19 – Potential scarcity of collateral Note: Assessment of the main risk categories for markets under ESMA’s remit since the past quarter, and outlook for the forthcoming quarter. Systemic risk assessment based on categorisation of the ESA Joint Committee. Colours indicate current risk intensity. Coding: green = potential risk, yellow = elevated risk, orange = high risk, red = very high risk. Upward arrows indicate a risk increase and downward arrows a risk decrease. ESMA risk assessment based on quantitative indicators and analyst judgement. R.4 R.5 ESMA composite equity illiquidity index Equity valuation Illiquidity spike at the beginning of 4Q18 Downward trend for EA, decrease in November for the US 0.27 30 0.26 25 0.25 20 0.24 15 0.23 10 0.22 5 0.21 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 0 Nov-16 Mar-17 Jul-17 Nov-17 Mar-18 Jul-18 Nov-18 Illiquid ity index 2Y- MA US EA Note: Composite i ndicator of illiquidity in the equity market for the c urrent Eurostoxx 200 constituents, com puted by applying the principal component 10Y -AVG US 10Y -AVG EA methodology to six input liquidity meas ures (Amihud illiquidity coefficient, bid-ask Note: Price-earning rati os bas ed on average infl ation-adjus ted earnings from the spread, Hui-Heubel ratio, turnov er value, inverse turnov er ratio, MEC). The previous 10 y ears (cyclically adj usted price-earning ratios). Averages c omputed indicator range is between 0 (higher liquidity) and 1 (lower liquidity). from the most recent data point up to 10 years before. Sources: Thomson Reuters Datastream, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters Datastream, ESMA. R.6 R.7 Equity prices Financial instrument volatilities Decreasing for all categories Higher volatilities in 4Q18 135 100 130 50 125 120 0 115 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 110 EUR 10 Y GBP 10 Y USD 10 Y 50 105 100 25 95 0 90 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 85 VSTOX X 1 M VSTOX X 3 M Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 VSTOX X 1 2M VSTOX X 2 4M Note: Top panel: implied volatilities on one-month Euro-Euribor, UK Pound Non-finan cia ls Ban ks Sterling-GBP Libor and US Dollar-USD Libor swaptions meas ured as price Insu rance Financial service s indices, in % ; bottom panel: Euro Stoxx 50 implied vol atilities, measured as price Note: STOXX Europe 600 equity total return indices. 01/12/2016=100. indices, in %. Sources: Thomson Reuters Datastream, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters EIKON, Thomson Reuters Datastream, ESMA. R.8 R.9 Exchange rate volatilities Sovereign risk premia Jump in volatility for GBP Higher since May 2018 16 8 14 7 12 10 6 8 5 6 4 4 3 2 0 2 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 1 EUR-USD EUR-GBP GBP -USD 5Y- MA EUR 0 Note: Implied volatilities for 3M options on exchange rates . 5Y-MA EUR is the Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 five-year movi ng av erage of the implied v olatility for 3M options on EUR-USD PT IE IT ES GR exchange rate. Note: Selected 10Y EA sovereign bond risk premia (vs. DE Bunds), in %. Sources: Thomson Reuters EIKON, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters Datastream, ESMA.
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 7 R.10 R.11 Sovereign bond bid-ask spreads ESMA composite sovereign bond illiquidity index Subject to spikes Illiquidity spikes in October and December 0.13 0.8 0.12 0.6 0.11 0.4 0.10 0.2 0.09 0.08 0.0 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 0.07 Eur o MTS Domestic MTS 0.06 1Y- MA Domestic 1Y- MA Eur o MTS Note: Composite indicator of market liquidity in the s overei gn bond Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 market for the domestic and Euro MTS platforms, computed by applying Bid-ask Euro MTS Bid-ask Domestic MTS the principal c omponent methodol ogy to four input liquidity meas ures 1Y MA Euro MTS 1Y MA Domestic MTS (Amihud illiqui dity c oefficient, Bid-ask spread, Roll illiqui dity measure and Note: Bi d-ask spread as av erage bid-ask s pread thr oughout a m onth across Turnover). The indicator range is between 0 (higher liquidity) and 1 (lower ten EU markets, Domestic and Euro MTS, in %. liquidity). Sources: MTS, ESMA. Sources: MTS, ESMA. R.12 R.13 Sovereign CDS volumes Sovereign repo volumes Stable Seasonal movements 18 70 260 16 60 240 14 220 50 12 200 10 40 180 8 30 6 160 20 4 140 2 10 120 0 0 100 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 DE ES FR IE Volume 1M-MA IT PT EU ( rhs) Note: Repo trans action vol umes ex ecuted through CCPs in sev en sover eign EUR Note: Value of outs tanding net noti onal sov ereign CDS for selected countries, in repo markets (AT, BE, DE, FI, FR, IT and NL), EUR bn. USD bn. Sources: RepoFunds Rate, ESMA. Sources: DTCC, ESMA. R.14 R.15 Repo market specialness Corporate bond spreads Higher dispersion in December Sharp increase in spreads 25 200 175 20 150 15 125 100 10 75 5 50 25 0 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 0 Median 75th perc 90th perc Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Note: Medi an, 75th and 90th percentile of weekly speci alness , meas ured as the AAA AA A BBB difference between gener al collateral and special collateral repo rates on Note: EA corporate bond s preads by rati ng between iBoxx corporate yi elds and government bonds in selected countries. ICAP Euro Euribor swap rates for maturities from 5 to 7 years, in bps. Sources: RepoFunds Rate, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters Datastream, ESMA. R.16 R.17 Corporate bond bid-ask spreads and Amihud indicator Long-term corporate debt outstanding Lower Amihud indicator despite higher bid-ask Rating distribution slightly deteriorating 0.6 0.6 100 0.5 0.5 80 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 60 0.2 0.2 40 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 20 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Bid -Ask 1Y- MA Amihu d (rh s) 0 Note: EUR Markit iBoxx corporate bond index bid- ask spr ead, in %, c omputed as 4Q1 3 4Q1 4 4Q1 5 4Q1 6 4Q1 7 4Q1 8 a one-month movi ng av erage of the iBoxx c omponents in the current AAA AA A BBB BB and lower composition. 1Y-MA=one-year moving av erage of the bi d-ask spread. Amihud Note: Outstandi ng amount of corporate bonds in the EU as of issuanc e date by liquidity coefficient index between 0 and 1. Higher value indicates less liquidity. rating category, in % of the total. Sources: IHS Markit, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters EIKON, ESMA.
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 8 R.18 R.19 Covered bond spreads Dispersion in sovereign yield correlation Further increase in 4Q18 High correlation 120 1.0 100 0.5 80 60 0.0 40 -0.5 20 0 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 -1.0 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 All AAA AA A 5Y- MA Top 25% Core 50% Bottom 25% Median Note: Ass et swap spreads based on iBoxx covered bond indices, in bps. 5Y- Note: Dispersion of c orrelations betw een 10Y DE Bunds and other EU c ountries' MA=five-year moving average of all bonds. sovereign bond redemption yields over 60D rolling windows. Sources: Thomson Reuters Datastream, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters Datastream, ESMA. R.20 R.21 Sectoral equity indices correlation Debt issuance growth Increasing correlations Decline in issuance across bond classes 1.0 4 0.9 2 0 0.8 -2 MM 4Q1 6 MM 4Q1 7 MM 4Q1 8 SOV 4Q 16 SOV 4Q 17 SOV 4Q 18 IG 4 Q16 IG 4 Q17 IG 4 Q18 HY 4 Q16 HY 4 Q17 HY 4 Q18 CB 4 Q17 CB 4 Q18 CB 4 Q16 0.7 0.6 0.5 10% 90% Curren t Median Note: Growth rates of issuance v olume, in % , normalised by standard deviation 0.4 for the followi ng bond class es: high yi eld (HY), inv estment grade (IG), c overed Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 bonds (CB), money m arket (MM), sovereign (SOV). Percentiles computed from Ban ks Financial service s 12Q rolling window. All data include sec urities with a maturity higher than 18M, Insu rance Non-finan cia l corpor ati on except for MM (maturity less than 12M). Bars denote the range of values Note: Correlati ons between daily returns of the STOXX Europe 600 and ST OXX between the 10th and 90th percentil es. Missing di amond indic ates no iss uanc e Europe 600 sectoral indices. Calculated over 60D rolling windows. for previous quarter. Sources: Thomson Reuters Datastream, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters EIKON, ESMA. R.22 R.23 Net sovereign debt issuance Debt redemption profile Negative net issuance in the EU Lower short-term financing needs for financials 40 120 350 50 300 0 20 60 250 -50 0 0 200 -100 -20 -60 150 -150 100 -40 -120 50 -200 -60 -180 0 -250 MT LU LV LT HR HU RO CY DE DK CZ IE IT NL FR GR FI GB BG EU BE EE AT ES PL PT SE SK SI 4Q1 8 4Q1 9 4Q2 0 4Q2 1 4Q2 2 4Q2 3 1Y high 1Y low 4Q1 8 Financial s Non-finan cia ls Note: Quarterly net issuanc e of EU sover eign debt by c ountry, EUR bn. Net 1Y- cha nge fin (rhs) 1Y- cha nge non-fin (rhs) issuanc e calc ulated as the difference betw een new issuance over the quarter and Note: Quarterly redempti ons ov er 5Y-horizon by EU private financial and non- outstanding debt maturing over the quarter. Highest and low est quarterly net financi al corporates , EUR bn. 1Y-change= difference betw een the sum of this issuance in the past year are reported. EU total on right-hand scale. year's (four last quarters) and last year's (8th to 5th last quarters) redemptions. Sources: Thomson Reuters EIKON, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters EIKON, ESMA.
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 9 Investors R.24 Risk summary Risk drivers – Asset re-valuation and risk re-assessment Risk level – Correlation in asset prices Risk change from 3Q18 – Risky market practices: CAs, ICOs Outlook for 1Q19 Note: Assessment of the main risk categories for markets under ESMA’s remit since the past quarter, and outlook for the forthcoming quarter. Systemic risk assessment based on categorisation of the ESA Joint Committee. Colours indicate current risk intensity. Coding: green = potential risk, yellow = elevated risk, orange = high risk, red = very high risk. Upward arrows indicate a risk increase and downward arrows a risk decrease. ESMA risk assessment based on quantitative indicators and analyst judgement. R.25 R.26 Cumulative global investment fund EU bond fund net flows Outflows from all fund categories in 4Q18 Net outflows for most categories 2,500 40 30 1,500 20 500 10 0 -500 -10 -20 -1,500 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Corpor ate Govern me nt Emergi ng Eur ope BF Eur ope EF HY Mixed Other asse ts Emergi ng mar kets BF Emergi ng mar kets EF Note: Two-month cumulative net flows for bond funds, EUR bn. Funds investi ng North A me rica BF North A me rica EF in corporate and gov ernment bonds that qualify for another category are only Note: C umulativ e net fl ows into bond and equity funds (BF and EF) over time reported once ( e.g. funds i nvesti ng in emergi ng gov ernment bonds reported as since 2004 by regional investment focus, EUR bn. emerging; funds investing in HY corporate bonds reported as HY). Sources: Thomson Reuters Lipper, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters Lipper, ESMA. R.27 R.28 Rate of return volatilities by fund type Liquidity risk profile of EU bond funds Higher return volatility Stable liquidity and mixed maturity changes 16 100 14 80 12 60 10 8 40 6 20 4 0 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 Other fu nds Loa n funds Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 HY fund s Govern me nt bond funds Equ ity Bon d Commo dity Corpor ate bon d funds Alterna tive Mixed a ssets Real estate Note: F und ty pe is reported accordi ng to the av erage liqui dity rati o, in % (Y-axis), Note: Annualised 40-day historical return vol atility of EU-domiciled i nvestment the effective av erage maturity of assets , in years (X-axis), and the size. Eac h funds, in %. series is reported for two years, i.e. 2017 (pale colours) and 2018 (dark colours). Sources: Thomson Reuters Lipper, ESMA Sources: Thomson Reuters Lipper, ESMA. R.29 R.30 Financial market interconnectedness Retail fund synthetic risk and reward indicator High for hedge funds, decreasing for MMFs Higher for equity and commodity funds 20 80 7 6 15 75 5 10 70 4 3 5 65 2 0 60 1 3Q1 3 3Q1 4 3Q1 5 3Q1 6 3Q1 7 3Q1 8 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Tota l funds Hedge funds Equ ity Bon d Alterna tive Bon d funds MMFs ( rhs) Commo dity Money mar ket Real estate Note: Loan and debt securities vis-à-vis MFI counterparts, as a s hare of total Note: T he c alculated synthetic risk and reward i ndicator (SSRI) is based on assets. EA investment funds and MMFs, in %. Total funds includes: bond funds, ESMA SRRI guidelines. It is c omputed vi a a simple 5-year annualised v olatility equity funds, mixed funds, real estate funds, hedge funds, MMFs and other non- measure which is then translated into categories 1-7 (with 7 repres enti ng higher MMF investment funds. levels of volatility). Sources: ECB, ESMA. Sources: Thomson Reuters Lipper, ESMA.
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 10 Infrastructures and services R.31 Risk summary Risk drivers – Operational risks, including cyber and Brexit-related risks Risk level – Conduct risk, including intentional or accidental behaviour by Risk change from 3Q18 individuals, market abuse – Systemic relevance, interconnectedness between Outlook for 1Q19 infrastructures or financial activities, system substitutability Note: Assessment of the main risk categories for markets under ESMA’s remit since the past quarter, and outlook for the forthcoming quarter. Systemic risk assessment based on categorisation of the ESA Joint Committee. Colours indicate current risk intensity. Coding: green = potential risk, yellow = elevated risk, orange = high risk, red = very high risk. Upward arrows indicate a risk increase and downward arrows a risk decrease. ESMA risk assessment based on quantitative indicators and analyst judgement. R.32 R.33 Complaints indicator by rationale Complaints indicator by instrument Execution of orders as the main cause for complaints Complaints regarding debt securities decline 100 400 0 100 4000 300 0 3000 50 200 0 50 2000 100 0 1000 0 0 0 0 3Q1 4 1Q1 5 3Q1 5 1Q1 6 3Q1 6 1Q1 7 3Q1 7 1Q1 8 3Q1 8 3Q14 1Q15 3Q15 1Q16 3Q16 1Q17 3Q17 1Q18 3Q18 Other causes Unauthorised business Other investment products/funds Financial contracts for difference General admin Fees/charges Options, futures, swaps Mutual funds/UCITS Quality/lack of Information Portfolio management Money-market securities Structured securities Investment advice Execution of orders Bonds/debt securities Shares/stock/equity Total volume reported (right scale) Total volume reported (right scale) Note: Complaints reported directly to 18 NCAs: AT, BG, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, HR, HU, IT, LT, LU, MT, Note: Compl aints reported directly to 18 NCAs: AT, BG, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, HR, HU, IT, LT, LU, MT, PT, PT, RO, SI. Line shows total volume of these compla ints. Bars show % of total volu me by cause. Data collected RO, SI. Line shows total number of these complaints. Bars show % of total volume by type of financial instrument. by NCAs. Source: ESMA complaints database R.34 R.35 Circuit-breaker-trigger events by sector Circuit-breaker occurrences by market capitalisation Higher share for healthcare Increased number of circuit-breaker triggered 100 500 75 400 50 300 25 200 0 100 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 0 Basic Materia ls, Indu strials and Energ y Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Technolog y, Utilities an d Telecommunications S ervice s Healthcare, Consumer Cyclicals an d Non- Cyclicals Larg e caps Mid cap s Small caps ETFs Financial s Note: Number of daily circuit-breaker trigger events by type of financial Note: Percentage of circuit-breaker trigger events by economic sector. Res ults instrument and by m arket c ap. Resul ts dis played as weekly aggregates.T he displayed as w eekly aggregates.T he analysis is bas ed on a s ample of 10,000 analysis is based on a sampl e of 10,000 sec urities, including all cons tituents of securities, incl uding all constituents of the STOXX Europe Large/Mid/Small 200 the STOXX Europe Lar ge/Mid/Small 200 and a l arge s ample of ETFs tracking the and a large sample of ETFs tracking the STOXX index or sub-index. STOXX index or sub-index. Sources: Morningstar Real-Time Data, ESMA. Sources: Morningstar Real-Time Data, ESMA. R.36 R.37 Trading system capacity proxy Equity market concentration Volumes at 25% of capacity on average Increasing towards the end of the quarter 80 80 60 50 60 60 40 40 40 30 20 20 20 10 0 0 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 0 Tradin g volume 3M-MA vol ume Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Capacity (rhs) All- time high (rhs) Top 25% Core 50% Bottom 25% Median Note: D aily and three-month moving av erage trading volume regist ered on 36 EU Note: Concentrati on of notional v alue of equity trading by national i ndices trading venues, EUR bn. C apaci ty com puted as the average across tradi ng computed as a 1M-MA of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, in %. Indices i ncluded venues of the raio of daily trading vol ume over maximum volume observed si nce are FTSE100, CAC 40, DAX, FTSE MIB, IBEX35, AEX, OMXS30, BEL20, 31/03/2016, in %. OMXC20, OMXH25, PSI20, ATX. Sources: Morningstar Realtime, ESMA. Sources: BATS, ESMA.
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 11 R.38 R.39 Settlement fails OTC central clearing rates Decrease for equities, higher for corporates Increasing for credit derivatives and IRDs in 2017 10 70 8 60 6 50 4 40 2 30 20 0 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 10 Corpor ate bon ds 6M-MA cor p Equ itie s 6M-MA equities 0 Govern me nt bond s 6M-MA gov 1Q1 7 2Q1 7 3Q1 7 4Q1 7 Note: Share of failed settlement instruc tions i n the EU, in % of value, one-week moving averages. Jum p in Dec ember 2018 due to a singl e tr ansac tion instruc ted on 10 D ecember with s ettlement requested on the same day which was fi nally CD IRD cancelled on 18 December 2018 (amount of EUR 500bn). Note: Shar e of gross notional amount outst anding for credit derivatives Sources: National Competent Authorities, ESMA. (CD) and interest rate derivatives (IRD), in %. Sources: TRs, ESMA. R.40 R.41 Difference between the Euribor and the maximum contribution Euribor – dispersion of submission levels Slightly lower levels in December Low and stable overall dispersion 0.3 0.1 0.0 -0.1 0.2 -0.2 -0.3 0.1 -0.4 -0.5 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 0 Top 15% Core 70% Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Bottom 15% Raw 3M Euribo r Note: N ormalised differ ence in percentage poi nts betw een the highest 3M E uribor ECB refinancing rate contribution submitted by panel banks and the c orresponding Euribor rate. T he Note: Dispersion of 3M Euribor submissions, i n % . T he "Raw 3M Euribor" rate is chart shows the maximum difference across the eight Euribor tenors. calculated without trimming the top and bottom submissions of the panel for the Sources: European Money Markets Institute, ESMA. 3M Euribor. Sources: European Money Markets Institute, ESMA. R.42 R.43 Rating changes Financial services data breaches High rating volatility in October Increasing share for financials 8 200 20 6 150 15 100 10 4 50 5 2 0 0 0 1H13 2H13 1H14 2H14 1H15 2H15 1H16 2H16 1H17 2H17 1H18 Dec-16 Apr -17 Aug -17 Dec-17 Apr -18 Aug -18 Dec-18 Identity the ft Financial access Non-financial Covered bond Existen tia l da ta Account access Financial Insurance Nuisance % of tota l (rh s) Sovereign Structured finance Note: Volatility of rati ngs by all credit rating agenci es, excl uding CERVED and Note: Estimated number of data breaches, financial services only, worldwide, by ICAP, by asset class c omputed as number of rating changes over number of type. Breac hes i n financi al services s ector as % of total data breaches acr oss all outstanding ratings. sectors (secondary axis). Both s eries as reported by the Gemalto Breac h Level Sources: RADAR, ESMA. Index. The underlying data were gathered by Gemalto from publicly available reports of information breaches. Sources: Gemalto Breach Level Index, ESMA.
ESMA Risk Dashboard No. 1, 2019 12
You can also read