Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility - Handbook for Participating Organisations
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Handbook for participating organisations Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Handbook for Participating Organisations Version 4.1 – February 2020 (Calls 2018, 2019 & 2020) Handbook for participating organisations January 2020 1
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations Contents Acronyms and abbreviations 3 I – What is ICM and how do I apply? 5 Grant breakdown 6 Who can apply? 7 Eligible partner organisations 7 Roles and responsibilities 8 Timeline 9 Inclusion and diversity 9 EU Budget – what you need to know 11 Erasmus+ Partner Countries eligible for International Credit Mobility 13 Application process 14 Do's and don'ts for applicant HEIs 17 Evaluation procedure 22 Grant award decision 22 II – Preparing and implementing the mobility 23 Contractual documents 23 Quality implementation of the project 26 Selection of participants 26 Mobility Tool+ 27 Support to participants 27 Grant payment to the participant 31 Zero-grants from EU funds 32 Interruption, early termination and extension of the mobility 33 Making changes to your project 34 Support and monitoring 36 Traineeships in ICM 38 Staff mobility to and from non-academic organisations 41 III – After the mobility: recognition and reporting 42 Credit recognition 42 Reporting 45 Project timeline 46 Useful resources 47 Contact 47 ANNEX 48 January 2020 2
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations Acronyms and abbreviations We have tried to keep the language in this Handbook as simple and as clear as possible. When we have used acronyms or abbreviations we have made sure to spell these out at least once. Here they are, just in case… DCI: Development Cooperation Instrument EC: European Commission ECHE: Erasmus Charter for Higher Education ECTS: European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System EDF: European Development Fund ENI: European Neighbourhood Instrument EU: European Union FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions HEI: Higher education institution ICM: International Credit Mobility IIA: Inter-institutional agreement IPA: Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance KA107: IT terminology for International Credit Mobility MT+: Mobility Tool+ NA: Erasmus+ National Agency NEO: National Erasmus+ Office OID : Organisation ID OS: Organisational Support PI: Partnership Instrument PIC: Participant Identification Code January 2020 3
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations Introduction For 30 years, the European Union has funded the Erasmus programme which has enabled over 4 million European students to spend part of their studies in another higher education institution (HEI) in Europe. In 2015, Erasmus+ opened up these opportunities to individuals and organisations from other parts of the world. Through "International Credit Mobility" - ICM for short - European HEIs can set up mobility agreements with partners around the world to send and receive students and staff. What's in it for individuals? ICM projects aim to help participants acquire key skills, support their professional development and deepen their understanding of other cultures. The Erasmus Impact Study1 finds that taking part in Erasmus+ is likely to boost a graduate's employability and transversal skills. Unemployment rates among Erasmus participants are 23% lower 5 years after graduation compared to those who did not go abroad. Two-thirds of employers think that international experience is a key asset for job candidates and leads to greater professional responsibility. Staff can acquire new competences for their professional development, improve their language skills and learn about new working methods. What's in it for institutions? ICM aims to increase the capacities, attractiveness and international dimension of the organisations taking part. International ties between institutions will be strengthened, giving the partners the opportunity to increase their visibility at local and global levels. Both incoming and outgoing students will be ready to share their positive experiences of studying at your institution. Purpose of this handbook This handbook aims to support both Programme and Partner Country HEIs 2 in the implementation of their ICM project, from application to final report. This handbook will provide you with information on the key documents, rules and guidelines you will need to be aware of. It will guide you through the various steps your institution will be expected to take, and tell you where to go for further information. This handbook does not replace the Erasmus+ Programme Guide 3, which you should refer to for more detailed information. We hope you find this handbook useful, and wish you every success with your ICM project. The International Credit Mobility Team 1 Erasmus Impact Study, September 2014: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/resources/documents/erasmus-impact-study_en 2 For the purposes of ICM, there are 34 Erasmus+ Programme Countries, which are the 28 EU Member States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, the Republic of North Macedonia, Turkey and Serbia. Partner Countries are all other countries in the world. 3 https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/resources/documents/erasmus-programme-guide- 2020_en January 2020 4
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations I – What is ICM and how do I apply? International Credit Mobility (ICM) supports the mobility of individuals enrolled or employed at a higher education institution (HEI), from a Programme Country to a Partner Country or vice versa, namely: • Student mobility for studies, open to short cycle, first cycle (Bachelor or equivalent) or second cycle (Master or equivalent) students, as well as third cycle doctoral candidates. The mobility period can last from 3 months (or one academic term) to 12 months. • Student mobility for traineeships, open from call 2018 to short cycle, first cycle (Bachelor or equivalent) or second cycle (Master or equivalent) students, as well as third cycle doctoral candidates. The mobility period can last from 2 to 12 months. See dedicated section on 'Traineeships'. • Staff mobility for teaching for academic staff and (from call 2018) for invited staff from non- academic organisations to teach at a partner higher education institution (HEI) abroad. The mobility period can last from 5 days to 2 months. • Staff mobility for training for teaching and non-teaching staff in the form of training events abroad (excluding conferences), job shadowing, observation periods and/or training at a partner HEI. The mobility period can last from 5 days to 2 months. This activity also supports the mobility of staff from Partner Country HEIs to train at a non-academic organisation located in a Programme Country. See dedicated section on 'Staff mobility to and from non-academic organisations'. Student and staff mobility can take place in any subject area or academic discipline. Moreover, HEIs are free to apply for staff mobility or student mobility, or any combination of the two. Staff teaching and training activities can be combined. A study period and a traineeship can also be combined, for a minimum of 3 months (or one academic term) and a maximum of 12 months. January 2020 5
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations Grant breakdown 4 Individual support Student monthly Staff daily rate 6 Mobility to… rate 5 (2018-2020) (2018-2020) Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom € 900 € 180 Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, France, Germany, Greece, € 850 € 160 Italy, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, the Republic of North Macedonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, € 800 € 140 Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Turkey All Partner Countries € 700 € 180 Travel allowance Travel distances 7 Amount Between 10 and 99 KM €20 per participant Between 100 and 499 KM € 180 per participant Between 500 and 1999 KM € 275 per participant Between 2000 and 2999 KM € 360 per participant Between 3000 and 3999 KM € 530 per participant Between 4000 and 7999 KM € 820 per participant 8000 KM or more € 1,500 per participant 4 These grant rates apply to projects selected from call 2018. 5 The rates for student mobility for studies and for traineeships are the same. In ICM, there is no "top-up" grant for traineeship mobility. However, some National Agencies for Erasmus+ in Programme Countries allow for student grants to be topped up between € 100-200 per month, both for incoming and outgoing students from disadvantaged backgrounds undertaking studies and/or traineeships. Please check with your relevant National Agency whether this is possible. 6 These staff mobility rates apply up to the 14th day of activity, after which the grant drops to 70% of the amount shown. 7 Travel distances must be calculated using the distance calculator supported by the European Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/resources/distance-calculator_en). The travel distance for one direction is used to calculate the EU grant amount for the round trip. January 2020 6
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations Organisational support The grant foresees an organisational support (OS) contribution of €350 per participant to cover costs directly linked to the implementation of mobility activities, such as the selection of participants, linguistic preparation, visa and insurance costs. It is important that the distribution of the OS grant as far as possible reflects each partner's workload in support of the mobility project. The cooperating institutions should agree on how to use or share the OS grant and include the details in the inter-institutional agreement. The rules of the programme allow transferring OS funds to travel and individual support (in order to fund longer or new mobilities). This possibility should only be used in exceptional cases, as it presupposes that the HEIs are already providing high quality student and staff mobility, including support to students from disadvantaged backgrounds as well as linguistic and cultural preparation for all participants. In case that flexibility is used, it cannot exceed 50% of the OS funds allocated to the whole project. For more information on the grant, please refer to Part B of the Erasmus+ Programme Guide. Who can apply? Any Programme Country HEI is eligible to apply for ICM funding to its National Agency (NA) as an individual HEI and/or via a consortium application: • For an application as an individual HEI: The applicant HEI must hold a valid Erasmus Charter for Higher Education (ECHE) 8. • For an application as a national mobility consortium: The consortium must hold a higher education consortium accreditation. Organisations that do not hold a valid consortium accreditation can apply for this accreditation at the same time as applying for a mobility project. All HEIs involved in the consortium must hold a valid ECHE. Skip to section b "Getting the right accreditation" for more information. Eligible partner organisations Organisations from around the world are eligible to take part in ICM as partners, with the exception of those located in regions 5 and 12. 9 Participating Partner Country HEIs must be recognised as higher education institutions (HEI) 10 by the relevant authority in the Partner Country. They must sign an inter-institutional agreement with their partner in the Programme Country before any mobility can take place. Find out more about this agreement in section II of this Handbook. If an exchange takes place with an organisation that is not a recognised HEI, the mobility is ineligible and the funds must be recovered. As the organisation submitting the application, the Programme Country HEI is responsible for verifying the eligibility of all partners in their application, and throughout the project lifecycle. Other organisations in Programme and Partner Countries are also eligible to take part in an ICM project. These organisations can host students on traineeship or HEI staff in training, while staff 8 Erasmus Charter for Higher Education: ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/resources/documents-for-applicants/erasmus-charter- higher-education_en 9 Region 5: Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, Vatican City State; Region 12: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates. 10 According to the Erasmus+ Programme Guide, this is any type of higher education institution which, in accordance with national law or practice, offers recognised degrees or other recognised tertiary level qualifications, whatever such establishment may be called, or any institution which, in accordance with national law or practice, offers vocational education or training at tertiary level. January 2020 7
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations from these organisations can be invited to teach at an HEI. These organisations must be active in the labour market or in the fields of education, training and youth. See dedicated section on 'Traineeships'. Roles and responsibilities Participating organisations involved in the mobility project take on the following roles and responsibilities: • The applicant organisation (always the Programme Country HEI) submits an application to its NA on behalf of its partner(s). The applicant can also apply on behalf of a consortium of several partners from the same Programme Country. • Once selected, the beneficiary organisation (always the Programme Country HEI) signs and manages the grant agreement, and reports at the end of the project. The beneficiary is financially responsible for the entirety of the grant. • The sending organisation (from either a Programme or a Partner Country) is responsible for selecting the students and staff and sending them abroad. This includes preparation, monitoring and recognition activities. • The receiving organisation (from either a Programme or a Partner Country) hosts the students and staff from abroad, providing support during their stay. Students and staff normally apply directly to their institution. The selection criteria for participation in the mobility activities are defined by the HEIs involved in the project. Many of these procedures are flexible and institutions are welcome to find the arrangements which work best for their needs, for example, institutions may prefer to establish joint selection procedures. January 2020 8
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations This table provides an overview of ICM activities and eligible organisations: Student Student mobility Staff mobility Staff mobility mobility for for traineeships for teaching for training studies (SMP) (STA) (STT) (SMS) Programme or Partner Country HEI Sending Programme or Programme or Programme or or organisation can Partner Country Partner Country Partner Country Programme or be… HEI HEI HEI Partner Country public or private organisation Programme or Programme or Partner Country Partner Country HEI HEI Receiving Programme or Programme or or or organisation can Partner Country Partner Country Programme or Programme be… HEI HEI Partner Country Country public public or private or private organisation organisation Timeline The selection of projects for ICM is based on an annual call for proposals issued by the European Commission and published on the Erasmus+ website in October. The application and selection process is managed by each NA. This is the NA in the country where the applicant organisation (or consortium coordinator) is based. Applicants must submit their grant application to their NA by the deadline specified in the call for proposals published on the Erasmus+ website, at the latest by 12:00 noon (Brussels time, CET) for projects starting on 1 August of the same year 11. ICM projects can run for either 24 or 36 months 12, to be specified at application stage. The start and end dates of all mobility activities must fall within the start and end dates of the project. Inclusion and diversity The Erasmus+ Programme aims at promoting equity and inclusion by facilitating access to participants with disadvantaged backgrounds and fewer opportunities compared to their peers. To meet this objective in international credit mobility, it is essential to count with projects that take inclusion into account since their conception. Therefore, this Handbook will also highlight different elements that institutions should consider, from outreach and participant selection, to grant management and support. 11 From call 2019, all projects start on 1 August of the call year, and no longer 1 June. 12 From call 2019, projects can run for either 24 or 36 months. January 2020 9
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations Before you get started, check the Programme Guide and see the list of examples of what can constitute a disadvantage in its section on “Equity and Inclusion” 13: • Disability and special needs, as well as other health problems. • Economic obstacles (e.g. low income, etc.) • Immigrants or refugees (or descendants from immigrant or refugee families); people belonging to a national or ethnic minority; linguistic differences etc. • Geographical obstacles, including among others people from remote or rural areas; people living in small islands/peripheral regions; etc. • People facing discrimination linked to different social issues. • Educational difficulties. Several National Agencies add further details to this list, looking for example at more specific situations such as that of students with family responsibilities, students who are the first generation attending higher education, etc. Please check with your National Agency whether such additional details applies in your country. 13 Erasmus+ Programme Guide 2020 January 2020 10
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations EU Budget – what you need to know The EU budget available for this action is split into 12 discrete 'envelopes' for each region of the world. 14 The size of each envelope is set according to the EU's external priorities, with some regions benefitting from bigger budget envelopes and therefore funding more mobilities. The largest budgets are allocated to the EU's neighbourhood regions – East and South, the Western Balkans, Asia and Russia. 15 In addition to the 12 budget envelopes, the European Commission may provide additional funding for priority countries or regions, on top of the budgets already available. National Agencies will be 14 The number and size of the budget envelopes will remain relatively stable under each call. The Region 11 envelope was added under the 2016 call and the Region 9 envelope under the 2017 call. Additional funding may be provided for specific countries. The detailed budget is communicated each year ahead of the call deadline. 15 The general budget is funded from 5 EU funding instruments: the Partnership Instrument (PI), European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI), Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA), Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) and European Development Fund (EDF). Visit our website to find out more: https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/funding/funding-instruments-programming/funding-instruments_en January 2020 11
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations able to opt-in for a share of these extra 'windows'. Namely, under 2020 call there is around 40 million EUR more for cooperation with various African countries, Western Balkans and Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia supplementing existing funds under the ENI South, , ENI East, EDF and IPA envelopes shown above. Applicants should always keep the different budgets in mind when applying for mobilities. There is little point in applying for the entire national budget available in a smaller envelope (for instance Latin America or North America) when the NA, especially in large Programme Countries, will be under pressure to satisfy a large volume of demand from HEIs. On the other hand, competition may be considerably lower for larger budget envelopes, such as the South-Mediterranean, Eastern Partnership and Western Balkans. Applicants should also be aware that NAs are required to ensure geographical balance within envelopes. This means that, all things being equal, NAs will be looking to fund projects with partners in low-income and least developed Partner Countries, as well as in the large emerging economies such as China, India, Mexico or Brazil. 16 So if the applicant has the choice between equally strong partners, a strategic decision may be to give preference to the partnerships they have with the least developed countries in a given region. The EU's international budget (Heading 4) cannot fund short cycle, first cycle (Bachelor or equivalent) or second cycle (Master or equivalent) mobility, from a Programme Country to any of the Partner Countries funded by the DCI and EDF instruments 17. This applies to mobility for studies and for traineeships. Outgoing third cycle (PhD candidates) or staff are eligible to be sent to DCI and EDF Partner Countries, and Programme Country HEIs can receive incoming students and staff without any restriction. To compensate for these restrictions, NAs may choose to use a share of their intra-European budget (Heading 1) to fund outgoing short cycle, first and second cycle students to Partner Countries. Applicants should check with their NA before submitting their application. If you receive this type of funding, please pay special attention to the restrictions regarding the use of this Heading 1 funding. More information is available in the section “Making changes to your project”. All eligible Partner Countries are listed on the next page. For more information on the funding rules, budget restrictions and country priorities, please visit the NA's website 18 or see the relevant section in the Erasmus+ Programme Guide. 16 In Asia and Latin America, the EU has set a number of explicit targets which will need to be achieved EU-wide by 2020: at least 25% of the budget available must go to projects with the least developed countries in Asia, namely Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Nepal; no more than 30% of the budget available for Asia can go to projects with China and India combined; at least 25% of the budget available must go to projects with the least developed countries in Latin America, namely Bolivia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua; and no more than 35% of the budget available for Latin America can go to projects with Brazil and Mexico combined. 17 DCI Asia, DCI Central Asia, DCI Latin America, DCI Middle East, DCI South Africa, EDF Africa, Caribbean and Pacific. All eligible Partner Countries are listed on the next page. 18 National Agencies: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/node/2105 January 2020 12
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations Erasmus+ Partner Countries eligible for International Credit Mobility 19 European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) ENI Eastern Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Territory of Ukraine as recognised by international law Partnership ENI South- Algeria, Egypt, Israel 20, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine 21, Syria, Tunisia Mediterranean ENI Russian Territory of Russia as recognised by international law Federation Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA) IPA Western Balkans Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo* 22, Montenegro Development Co-operation Instrument (DCI) Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, DPR Korea, India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, DCI Asia Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam DCI Central Asia Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, DCI Latin America Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Venezuela DCI Middle East Iran, Iraq, Yemen DCI South Africa South Africa Partnership Instrument (PI) PI Americas Canada, Chile, United States of America, Uruguay 23 PI Industrialised Asia Australia, Brunei, Hong Kong, Japan, (Republic of) Korea, Macao, New Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan European Development Fund (EDF) Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Congo (Democratic Republic of the), Cook Islands, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Grenada, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Kenya, EDF Kiribati, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, African, Caribbean Micronesia-Federated States of, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Niger, Nigeria, Niue, Palau, Papua New and Pacific states Guinea, Rwanda, Saint Kitts And Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent And The Grenadines, Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Timor Leste (Democratic Republic of), Tanzania, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia, Zimbabwe. 19 Under calls 2018 and 2019, Switzerland and the Faroe Islands were eligible to participate in ICM as Partner Countries, only for outgoing Student Mobility for Traineeships in 'digital skills' from Programme Countries funded from Heading 1. See section on 'Traineeships' for more information. In call 2020 they are no longer eligible for funding. 20 The eligibility criteria formulated in Commission Notice Nr.2013/C-205/05 (OJEU C-205 of 19/07/2013, pp. 9-11) shall apply for all actions implemented through this Programme Guide, including with respect to third parties receiving financial support in the cases where the respective action involves financial support to third parties by grant beneficiaries in accordance with article 137 of the EU's Financial Regulation. 21 This designation shall not be construed as recognition of a State of Palestine and is without prejudice to the individual positions of the Member States on this issue. 22 *This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence. 23 Having graduated from the OECD's DAC List of recipients eligible to receive official development assistance (ODA), from the 2019 call, Chile and Uruguay will be funded through the PI Americas envelope (Region 13). The DCI rules limiting outgoing student mobility from Programme Countries will no longer apply to Chile and Uruguay in projects selected from the 2019 Call onwards. January 2020 13
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations Application process The Programme Country HEI will fill in the application form on Tips on choosing the right partner behalf of its partner(s) and submit the form to its National Agency. The institution offers transparent We encourage involving all partners in the application process, as descriptions of its programmes, the applicant will be asked to provide detailed information on their including learning outcomes, credits, cooperation arrangements and on the wider impact of their mobility learning and teaching approaches and project. assessment methods; • Finding a partner Its learning, teaching and assessment procedures are quality assured and To find a partner, we recommend you look at current or past can be accepted by your institution cooperation agreements your institution might have, either at the without requiring students to take any level of the institution (typically via the international relations additional work or examination; office), or at the level of individual faculties. Agreements may not only be made If you are looking for new partnerships, we encourage you to with institutions offering similar contact the relevant National Agency, who might know of interested programmes, but also with partners, as well as the National Erasmus+ Offices 24 in a number of institutions providing complementary countries neighbouring the EU. The EU partner search tool may also programmes. prove helpful. If you are reluctant to enter into new cooperation arrangements, you can think about starting with staff mobility to build mutual trust before extending the partnership to sending and receiving students. • Getting the right accreditation Having a valid Erasmus Charter for Higher Education (ECHE) is a pre-requisite for all HEIs established in a Programme Country that wish to participate in a mobility project either as a single HEI or as a member of a national mobility consortium. A call for proposals for the ECHE is held annually, and this is managed by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) 25. The award of an ECHE is valid for the whole duration of the Erasmus+ programme. HEIs established in a Partner Country must be accredited by the relevant national accreditation organisation and should not be subject to EU sanctions. As they are not eligible to receive an ECHE, the principles of the ECHE are enshrined in the inter-institutional agreement that they sign with their partner(s). You can find more information on this agreement under section II. An organisation from a Programme Country, applying on behalf of a national mobility consortium, must hold a valid consortium accreditation. A call for consortium accreditation is published on an annual basis by the NAs. A consortium accreditation is valid for three years. Organisations must request an accreditation before applying for a grant. Please read the relevant section in the Erasmus+ Programme Guide to find out more about the conditions to obtain a consortium accreditation. • The Organisation ID (OID) OIDs replace the existing Participant Identification Codes (PIC) for decentralised actions like ICM (PICs will remain valid for centralised actions). The Organisation ID is a 8-digit unique identifier 24 National Erasmus+ Offices are responsible for the local management of the international dimension of the higher education aspects of the Erasmus+ programme in 27 Partner Countries outside the EU. 25 Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency: https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus-plus/actions/erasmus-charter_en January 2020 14
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations preceded by the letter E. At application stage it is mandatory only for applicants, but during the lifetime of the ICM project every academic organisation involved will need and OID. All the organisations that already had a PIC before call 2020 and have participated in a decentralised action, have received a new OID automatically which can be consulted at the Organisation Registration web site providing the PIC or other contact details of the Organisation. Straightforward registration of new OIDs is also possible through that tool. Before filling in the application form, the Programme Country applicant will need their institution's Organisation ID (OID). If the Partner Country organisation already has an OID at application stage, it should be included in the relevant section of the application form. Otherwise, it would be required for Partner Country academic organisations to have an OID at the moment of encoding mobilities into Mobility Tool+ 26. Non-academic organisations (for traineeships or staff mobility) do not need OIDs, except when they receive HE-STT in partner countries. If either applicant or partner institution has already participated in an Erasmus+ decentralised action, they will already have a PIC and hence an OID. Please check carefully whether your institution or your partner already have an OID before registering a new one. • The application form The Programme Country institution can only submit one application for ICM per Call for Proposals, which should contain information on all the mobility activities they intend to carry out with their partner(s) in one or more Partner Countries. There is no limit to the number of Partner Countries in 26 Mobility Tool+ is the web platform tool for collaboration, management and reporting for mobility projects under Erasmus+. January 2020 15
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations the proposal. The same institution can also apply for ICM as part of a consortium of HEIs in that country, in which case they are responsible for preventing double funding of the same mobility. In case of multiple submissions of the same application in the same selection round, the National Agency will consider as valid the last version submitted before the application deadline. Partners should discuss and agree upon the details of their cooperation before writing the application. If applying as a single HEI, the applicant will have to provide its OID. Once the applicant's OID is entered, the field entitled "Accreditation Reference" will be automatically filled in with the corresponding Erasmus Code (e.g. A WIEN01). If the "Accreditation Reference" field remains empty, the OID entered is not linked to an Erasmus Code. Please go to the EACEA website for the most recent list of PICs and corresponding Erasmus Codes and compare it with the OID obtained in the the Organisation Registration web site. The Programme Country institution (or organisation) may apply on behalf of a higher education mobility consortium if it has a valid "Higher Education Mobility Consortium Accreditation" (from call 2017, 2018 or 2019) or if it has submitted an application for a consortium accreditation (KA108) in the current call. An accreditation reference number is structured as follows: 2018-1-ES01-KA108-095047. If the applicant has a valid consortium accreditation reference number from a successful application for accreditation and it remains valid for the current call, it will be possible to select the consortium accreditation reference number in the dropdown menu of the field "Accreditation Reference". If the mobility consortium has no consortium accreditation yet, it must submit a KA108 application for the accreditation of the consortium before filling in this part of the application. Once it is done, it will be possible to select the draft "Higher Education Mobility Consortium Accreditation" as described above. In the case of national mobility consortia for Higher education student and staff mobility, the coordinator of the consortium applies on behalf of the whole consortium. The members of the consortium linked to the accreditation reference will be automatically displayed. • The project This section is crucially important as it will determine which projects will ultimately be selected for funding by the National Agency. To successfully complete this section, the applicant must have a clear idea of whom they are going to work with and how the responsibilities will be divided. The applicant will list the Partner Countries with which it intends to cooperate. For each Partner Country, the full legal name of each partner institution must be clearly indicated (mandatory), together with their corresponding OID (optional at application stage). The applicant is also encouraged to name the non-academic partners that will host trainees or support staff mobility, although this information is not mandatory at the application stage. The names of all partner institutions provided in the application form will be included under Annex II of the grant agreement between the National Agency and the beneficiary institution, and will therefore become legally binding. For each Partner Country, the applicant will enter the type, number and duration of mobility flows requested, generating the corresponding EU grant requested. Each Partner Country project will be assessed separately, meaning that the NA might decide to fund mobilities with one Partner Country and not the other, or reduce the number of mobilities requested. For each Partner Country, the applicant will be asked to answer four questions relating to: 1) the relevance of the planned mobilities 2) the quality of cooperation agreements 3) the quality of the project design 4) its impact and dissemination for each Partner Country January 2020 16
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations Due to limited budget availability, National Agencies may limit: i) mobility flows in (a) particular degree level(s), for example limiting applications to one or two cycles only – short, first, second or third cycle, 27 ii) mobility for staff only or students only, and iii) the duration of mobility periods. Please consult the National Agency's website to find out if any of these limitations apply. Applicants should use the Distance Calculator 28 to calculate travel distances. If the city of origin and the host city are the same for all mobility activities in a flow, you should introduce the travel distance between those two cities. If there is more than one city of origin and/or host city, applicants may (a) encode a single flow using the average distance band or (b) encode several flows with different distance bands. If the National Agency supports first and second cycle outgoing student mobility to regions 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 29, applicants will have an additional option when applying for outgoing student flows. They will be asked whether the flow is for "Short, first and second cycle outgoing student mobility". If the applicant wishes to send students to said regions, it will have to select "yes" and fill in the flow. This information is required for the NA to ensure that the requested flows are eligible, according to the secondary criteria that they may have set. To apply for regular outgoing student mobilities at PhD level and for incoming student mobilities at any level, it will have to select "no" in the drop down menu and fill in the flow. Do's and don'ts for applicant HEIs The following section details each of the four Award Criteria. Using feedback from experienced evaluators in different Programme Countries, it provides suggestions and useful examples of what to include and avoid in the application, in order to increase the chances of the project being selected for funding. The Guide for Experts on Quality Assessment 30 may also prove useful when filling in this section to shed some light on how each answer will be assessed. 27 First cycle (Bachelor or equivalent), second cycle (Master or equivalent), third or doctoral cycle. 28 Distance Calculator: http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/resources/distance-calculator_en 29 See the previous section “Erasmus+ Partner Countries eligible for International Credit Mobility”. 30 2018 Erasmus+ Guide for Experts on Quality Assessment: http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus- plus/sites/erasmusplus2/files/iii.01_esc-eguide_for_experts_on_quality_assessment_2018.pdf January 2020 17
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Hand book for participating organisations 1. Relevance of the strategy 30 pts "Explain why the planned mobility project is relevant to the internationalisation strategy of the higher education institutions involved (both in the Programme and Partner Country). Justify the proposed type(s) of mobility (studies, traineeship, staff teaching or staff training)." Do √ Explain why you want to foster mobility. Attract talent? Research purposes? Opportunities for staff development? Etc. √ Explain the preference given to a certain region/country. Is there any institutional policy favouring the cooperation with this region/country? Is there particularly strong faculty cooperation with a specific HEI? √ Explain why the mobility project is relevant to your institution's internationalisation strategy. Does your internationalisation strategy focus on building partnerships in education, innovation and research? Is the choice of the partner institution made for strengthening cooperation? How? √ Explain why the planned mobility project is relevant to the internationalisation strategy of the partner institution(s). Please contact your partner(s) to find out. √ Try to provide 'quantifiable information' on the profile of selected partners. Size and influence in a particular area? Complementarity of faculties/departments involved? Similarity of study programmes? √ Try to distinguish the specific aims for choosing mobility of students and/or staff. Do you need to strengthen the partnership before sending students? Build mutual trust? Ease the recognition process? Staff mobility might be the way to start. √ Keep it short and simple, but make sure that you get all your points across. In case of new cooperation agreements, also: √ Explain why building cooperation with a new region/country is relevant for all the institutions involved. Diversification of your AND your partner's internationalisation strategy? √ Explain the complementarity of your and your partner's institutions. DoN'T Try not to be too generic in your answers. Do not target cooperation with each and every possible Partner Country, as budget is limited for International Credit Mobility. In 2015, the average number of Partner Countries in applications was 4 or 5. Do not focus only on your home institution, but describe what is in it for your partner and what the common benefits are. Refer to strategies in the Partner Country. Do not provide the same justification for the choice of different Partner Countries. Although you might have a largely similar reason for picking partners in the same country/region, benefits will vary depending on the institution. Be sure you make that clear in your description (e.g. by emphasising the differences). Do not copy-paste. If some parts of your answers are the same for each Partner Country or institution, answer them only once and refer to your first answer throughout the application. January 2020 18
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Handbook for participating organisations 2. Quality of the cooperation arrangements 30 pts "Detail your previous experience of similar projects with higher education institutions in this Partner Country, if any, and explain how, for the planned mobility project, responsibilities, roles and tasks will be defined in the Inter-institutional Agreement. If applicable, provide information about your previous experience and planned cooperation arrangements with receiving organisations for traineeships in your country and in this Partner Country." Do √ Explain the division of competences which has been agreed with your partner, as outlined in the Inter-institutional Agreement. Who offers which courses and when? Who provides support for visa/insurance/accommodation? Who is in charge for the selection and/or evaluation of participants? What will the students/staff have to do? Etc. √ Detail how the finances will be split between you and your partner, if applicable. Will you share the Organisational Support grant? Will you provide funds in addition to the EU grant? √ Explain how communication channels will work between you and your partner. Who is responsible for the paperwork? How will you monitor and report on the mobilities? Beware that you will have to report on mobilities in the EU's Mobility Tool+ on a monthly basis. √ Make sure that you and your partner have the financial and operational capacity to carry out these activities. √ Talk about similar previous experience and what this means for future cooperation. If you have previous experience with institutions in the Partner Country chosen, explain how this application builds on and enhances existing partnership arrangements? In case of new partnerships, also: √ Explain how previous international cooperation experience will be used to develop new partnerships. √ Provide information about your institution's experience in implementing credit mobility in general (between Programme Countries or between Programme & Partner Countries). DoN'T Do not assume that because you have previous experience, you do not have to explain how your project will work in future. Do not talk about cooperation arrangements only from your point of view. Explain what the partner institution will be doing. Be careful not to give the same information as in part 3: Quality of the project design and implementation, where you will be able to further develop the actual project implementation (in particular selection, support and recognition). Do not copy-paste. Handbook for participating organisations January 2020 19
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Handbook for participating organisations 3. Quality of the project design and implementation 20 pts "Present the different phases of the mobility project and summarise what partner organisations plan in terms of selection of participants, the support provided to them and the recognition of their mobility period (in particular in the Partner Country). Bear in mind that certain flows may not be eligible. Please consult the Programme Guide and your National Agency's website to know which limitations apply." Do √ Try to organise this section around the 3 phases of the mobility period: Before, During & After. What is offered to the students/staff during the different phases? By whom? √ For outgoing mobility to countries in regions 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, consult your National Agency to see whether it is eligible. Outgoing mobility to these countries is eligible only at doctoral level or for staff, unless your National Agency has made additional funds available. If so, specify the number of students and total duration per study level (e.g. 3 BA students to Cape Town University for a total duration of 18 months and 2 MA students for 24 months). √ Mention the completeness and quality of arrangements for the selection, support and recognition, both at your institution and at the partner institution. How will the participants be selected? Will they receive support for insurance/visa/housing? What kinds of facilities are available to the participants (libraries etc.)? How many credits or equivalent units will they receive? Etc. √ Try to address the additional support for disadvantaged people, language training, cultural integration activities, etc. - if planned. Will participants receive language courses? Will there be social and integration activities? How will participants from disadvantaged backgrounds or with special needs be encouraged to participate? √ Give an indicative timeline for each activity. When will the participants be selected? When will they receive language training? For how long? When will their mobility periods be recognised? Etc. DoN'T Do not forget that secondary criteria might apply (e.g. only staff or only student mobility). Do not forget to mention the study levels and total duration for outgoing mobility to countries in regions 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11. Do not focus solely on what you are going to do, but explain what your partner will be doing (recognition!). Do not forget to mention recognition for staff mobility. How will the home university capitalise on the experience abroad that their staff has undertaken? Do not simply repeat what you have already said in part 2: Quality of the cooperation arrangements. Try to develop. If need be, refer to the previousHandbook part, butfordo not copy participating paste. organisations January 2020 20
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Handbook for participating organisations 4. Impact and Dissemination 20 pts "Explain the desired impact of the mobility project on participants, beneficiaries, partner organisations and at local, regional and national levels. Describe the measures which will be taken to disseminate the results of the mobility project at faculty and institution levels, and beyond where applicable, in both the Programme and Partner Countries." Do √ Explain the impact and outcomes of the mobility project on the different stakeholders. What is the expected impact on the participants (e.g. what skills will they acquire)? What is the expected impact on your institution? What about your partner institution(s)? √ Explain the impact at local/regional/national level, including in the Partner Country. How will the outcomes be measured and evaluated? How will you know whether you have achieved the desired and expected impacts? √ Describe what dissemination activities you intend to carry out and through which channels. Do you have means to measure success and disseminate results (e.g. publications, surveys, newsletters, alumni networks etc.)? If not, how will you develop them? Will you work together with your partner? √ Explain who will benefit from the dissemination of project results. Will you keep the dissemination activity at the faculty/university level only or go beyond? What about your partner? √ The stated impact should be relative to the number and type of activities planned. While sending a Bachelor's student to a Partner Country might have an impact on the individual, it will hardly have a regional or national impact. But perhaps a focussed exchange of staff in a particular faculty is embedded within a strategy of developing joint curricula or joint research projects. DoN'T Do not forget to explain the expected impact at the partner institution, on its participants and at local, regional and national level. Do not mention only your dissemination strategy, but explain what your partner will be doing. If your dissemination activities are the same for each partnership, do not copy-paste. Mention them once and refer to them throughout the rest of your answers. Do not understand "desired impact" as what you wish to have as impact, but as what you can actually implement as a result of the mobility activities. January 2020 21
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Handbook for participating organisations Evaluation procedure Once the application has been submitted to the National Agency, it will undergo an evaluation procedure. The NA will appoint experts to verify the eligibility and quality of the application, supported by the Guide for Experts on Quality Assessment prepared by the European Commission. Experts will start by assessing the eligibility of all mobility flows requested, taking into account the budget rules and restrictions outlined in the first section of this document. If they pass the eligibility check, all planned mobilities with a particular Partner Country will be assessed separately according to the four quality criteria. Each question will be given a mark out of 20 or 30 as indicated in the guidelines. The total score for the four criteria must be over 60/100 in order to be considered for funding, with at least 15/30 for the first criterion on Relevance of the Strategy. In other words, no set of mobility flows with a Partner Country scoring below 60 in total and below 15 for the first criterion can be funded. According to the assessment of the quality criteria, the expert may recommend that the NA select only mobilities with certain Partner Countries (e.g. funding the sub-project with South Africa, but not with Chile), or only some mobility flows within a given Partner Country (only students or staff, incoming or outgoing). The expert can also recommend reducing the length of the proposed mobilites. Based on the expert's assessment, an evaluation committee will then decide which projects are ultimately selected for funding. In keeping with goals for geographical balance, the committee can modify the ranked order of sub-projects within a given region in order to ensure a better geographical spread. Where possible and in addition to the overarching criteria of order of merit and geographical balance, the NA will seek to spread the available budget widely to avoid a small number of HEIs dominating. The NA will strive to be as inclusive as possible, maximising participation of stakeholders without undermining quality, geographic balance or the minimum critical size per mobility project to ensure feasibility. From call 2020, the grant agreement includes the countries that passed the quality assessment and for which no funding could be allocated. For more information, please go to “the beneficiary grant agreement” under Section II – Preparing and implementing the mobility. Grant award decision NAs will notify the institutions of their final grant award decision. Successful applicants will be invited to sign a beneficiary grant agreement with their NA. If you have not signed an inter-institutional agreement with each of your partners yet, you should do so at this point, and in any case before the start of the first mobility. You will find more information in the next section. If one of your mobility sub-projects passed the quality threshold (60 points), but is rejected due to lack of funds in the given budget envelope, it may be placed at a reserve list. In the event that any of the beneficiaries should abstain from receiving funding, NAs can offer the funds to the applicant that is next on the reserve list for the same budget envelope. The deadline for this is the 31 December of the call year. From call 2020, your Grant Agreement will reflect the sub-projects that successfully passed the qualitative assessment and could not be granted funds due to insufficient funding in a “List of non- funded Partner Countries”. The condition for this is to receive funding for cooperation with at least one Partner Country. The objective is to allow for the organisation of mobilities as “zero-grant from EU funds” within the quality framework of the programme. More details are available in the section “Zero-grants from EU funds” in part II of this Handbook. January 2020 22
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility Handbook for participating organisations II – Preparing and implementing the mobility This section covers the main elements that relate to the management of your International Credit Mobility (ICM) project, using the experience of HEIs and their international offices. Please pay attention to the contractual documents listed below, and note that National Agencies will request to see the documents during monitoring visits and/or checks. Contractual documents • The beneficiary grant agreement If the ICM project has been selected for funding, the beneficiary institution in the Programme Country will have signed a mono-beneficiary grant agreement (or multi-beneficiary, if they are part of a national consortium) with their National Agency (NA). This agreement links the Programme Country HEI to its NA and provides the financial support for their mobility project. The partner institution is not a direct party to this agreement but their mobility project is described within the grant and is subject to the quality framework and monitoring of NAs and National Erasmus+ Offices, where available. This grant agreement captures the core of the project and is based on the information that was provided in the application form, assessed by a team of evaluators who will have selected the project – or parts of it – for funding. The annexes to the grant agreement detail the activities that have been retained for funding and specify the breakdown of the grant. As indicated above, the approved activities and the names of all partner institutions provided in the successful application form will be included under Annex II of this grant agreement and will therefore be legally binding. From call 2020, your Annex II also includes a “List of non-funded Partner Countries”. These are sub-projects that successfully passed the qualitative assessment, but no funds could be allocated due to insufficient funding. Mobilities with these non-funded Partner Countries may be organised as “zero-grant from EU funds”, for more details on zero-grants please read the dedicated section. In principle, the selected mobility flows must be implemented in accordance with this annex. However, certain modifications of the project are possible with or even without an amendment. The inter-institutional agreement Before any mobility activity can take place, your institution must sign an inter-institutional agreement with the partner institution involved in the project. You and your partner may wish to discuss the content of the agreement while preparing the project application. You should sign this agreement once your project has been selected for funding, and at the latest before the start of the first exchange. It is crucial that the partners discuss the content of the agreement from the moment they start preparing their application. Inter-institutional agreements must be made available during monitoring visits. January 2020 23
You can also read