Efficacy Data Updates from Novavax' Protein-based Vaccine Candidate - New York Academy of Sciences
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Efficacy Data Updates from Novavax’ Protein-based Vaccine Candidate New York Academy of Sciences Nasdaq: NVAX | February 2, 2021
Certain information, particularly information relating to future performance and other business matters, including expectations regarding clinical development, market opportunities and anticipated milestones constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements may generally contain words such as “believe,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “possible,” “can,” “estimate,” “continue,” “ongoing,” “consider,” “intend,” “indicate,” “plan,” “project,” “expect,” “should,” “would,” or “assume” or variations of such words or other words with similar meanings. Novavax cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties that change over time and may cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Uncertainties include but are not limited to clinical trial results, dependence on third party contractors, competition for clinical resources and patient enrollment and risks that we may lack the financial resources Safe Harbor to fund ongoing operations. Statement Additional information on Risk Factors are contained in Novavax’ filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and our Current Reports on Form 8-K, which are all available at http://www.sec.gov. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and currently available data and are neither predictions nor guarantees of future events or performance. Current results may not be predictive of future results. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements after they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. Matrix-M and NanoFlu are trademarks of Novavax, Inc. novavax.com 2
Agenda • Review of NVX-CoV2373 program • Clinical development updates § Preclinical § Phase 1-2 studies § Phase 2b & 3 efficacy studies • Next steps: Bivalent approach • Manufacturing novavax.com 3
NVX-CoV2373 Vaccine Design Vaccine Platform Technology: Nanoparticle vaccine formulated with Matrix-M™ Antigen Drug Substance Drug Product • Expressed in baculovirus (S. frugiperda) system • Native conformation trimers • Co-formulated with adjuvant • Full-length protein, including transmembrane domain • Stable PS80 nanoparticle • Dispensed in 10-dose vial • Furin cleavage site mutated and stabilized • Stored 2-8oC, ready-to-use NVX-CoV2373 A S1 S2 S1/S2 cleavage site 2P mutation 682-QQAQ-685 K986P/V987P SS mutation FP CT 1 NTD RBD SD1/SD2 HR1 CH HR2 TM 1273 S2' cleavage site WT: NSPRRARSVAS WT: SRLDKVEAEV 3Q: NSPQQAQSVAS 2P: SRLDPPEAEV Matrix-M adjuvant • Purified from Quillaja saponaria molina Bangaru et al. bioRxiv 06 August 2020 and Tian et al. bioRxiv 30 June 2020 novavax.com 5
Saponin Adjuvant/Nanoparticle, Influenza Antigen Drift More RBD & HA1/HA2 Epitopes Recognized More – and thicker – bars represent increased distribution and frequencies of antibodies to Unadjuvanted unique epitopes on the antigen. Saponin adjuvant results in epitope spreading In three serial trials, vaccine induced H3N2 HAI Adjuvanted showed good responses to drifted strains. SARS-CoV-2 will clearly undergo antigenic drift Adjuvanted Chung, K.Y., et al., 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.047 Portnoff, A.D., et al., 2020. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8010099 Shinde, V., et al., 2020. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1673 novavax.com 6
NVX-CoV2373 Protected Lower & Upper Airways in Rhesus Macaques No viral replication observed following Day 38 challenge with WT SARS-CoV-2 B A L : SLower u b g e n oAirway m ic R N A N a s a l SUpper w a b : SAirway u b g e n o m ic R N A Placebo P la c e b o NVX-CoV2373 N V X -C o V 2 3 7 3 PPlacebo la c e b o NNVX-CoV2373 V X -C o V 2 3 7 3 6 6 5 µ g v a c c in e + 5 0 µ g c o p ie s /m L c o p ie s /m L 5 5 5 µg vaccine 5 µ g ) M a tr ix -M 1 10 v a c c in e + 5 0 ) + 50 mg Matrix-M 10 T r a n s f e r flu id ( lo g 2 5 µ g v a c c in e + 5 0 µ g M a tr ix -M 1 ( lo g M a tr ix -M 1 4 4 25 µg vaccine 2 5 µ g v a c c i n e + 5 + 50 mg Matrix-M M a t r i x - M 1 f lu id G e n e E E G e n e 3 3 w a s h s g R N A s g R N A 2 2 1 1 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 7 2 4 7 2 4 7 D a Days y s P oPost s t C Challenge h a lle n g e D aDays y s P Post o s t Challenge C h a lle n g e novavax.com 7
NVX-CoV2373 Clinical Development Plan Study 1 Part 1 (2019nCoV-101) Phase 1 AU N=131; 18-59 years Study 1 Safety and 1 Part 2 (2019nCoV-101) Phase 2 AU/US N=1,288; 18-84 years (n=583 >60 years) Immunogenicity Includes Efficacy Assessment Study 2 (2019nCoV-501) Phase 2b South Africa N=4,422; 18-84 years (n=240 HIV+) Ongoing study Study 3 2019nCoV-302 Phase 3 UK N=15,203; 18-84 years (n=400 IIV co-admin) Study 4 Sponsor = SIIPL Phase 3 India N=1,600; 18-65 years (Novavax vs SIIPL) Study 5 (2019nCoV-502) Phase 2 Czech N=120; 12-59 years Study 6 2 Sponsor = Takeda Phase 2 Japan N=450; 20-65 years Study 7 2019nCoV-301 Phase 3 US/Mexico N=30,000; ≥18 years 1 Dose confirmation based on Phase 1 data: Aug 2020 2 Dose confirmation in adults >60 y based on Phase 2: Oct 2020 novavax.com 8
US and Australia Phase 1 Study Design N= 258 5 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M™ (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) 25 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) 131 R 25 µg Adults R 1:1:1:1:1 (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) 18-59 years N= 255 25 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M Placebo (Day 0) (Day 21) N= 255 Placebo (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) Reactogenicity data reviewed by SMC & FDA in advance of Phase 3 study novavax.com 10
Phase 1: Spike IgG and Neutralization Response at Day 35 GMEU 63,160 47,521 8,344 GMT 3,906 3,305 983 95% CI (47,117; 84,666) (33,803; 66,804) (4,420; 15,747) 95% CI (2,556; 5,970) (2,205; 4,953) (579; 1,670) Keech, C. et al. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026920 novavax.com 11
Phase 1: Spike IgG Response Through Six Months Matrix-MTM required for optimal immune response; 2 adjuvanted doses superior to 1 dose Matrix-M is dose-sparing Convalescent Sera (Median & CI; 20d post illness) 2 Doses: 25 µg + Matrix-M 2 Doses: 5 µg + Matrix-M 1 Dose: 25 µg + Matrix-M 2 Doses: 25 µg (no adjuvant) Placebo Phase 1: n = 131; 18-59 years of age; Vaccination on Day 0 and D21 (pre-publication) novavax.com 12
Adjuvanted Vaccine Induces IgG Response that Correlates Tightly with Neutralization Response Significant and consistent proportion of antibody is functional 2 Dose 5µg + Matrix-M™ combined with Convalescent Serum (Baylor) 2 Dose: 25µg (no adjuvant) 2 Dose 25µg + Matrix-M™ Keech, C. et al. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026920 novavax.com 13
US and Australia Phase 2 Study Design Includes ~50% of adults age 60-84 years N= 258 5 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M™ (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) N= 259 25 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) 1,288 R 5 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M Placebo Adults 1:1:1:1:1 (Day 0) (Day 21) >18 years N= 255 25 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M Placebo (Day 0) (Day 21) N= 255 Placebo (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) novavax.com 14
Phase 2: Reproduced Phase 1 Lessons 2 Matrix-M™-adjuvanted doses of 5 µg and 25 µg induced comparable, robust immune responses Consistent with Phase 1 data 2 Doses: 25 µg + Matrix-M 2 Doses: 5 µg + Matrix-M 5 µg 1 Dose: 25 µg + Matrix-M 1 Dose: 5 µg + Matrix-M Placebo Phase 2: n =1288; ≥ 18 years of age (n = 583 >60 years of age) (pre-publication) novavax.com 15
Phase 2 Local Reactogenicity: Well-tolerated Many participants experienced no reactions, and when they did occur, all were mild-to-moderate in severity with a mean duration ~2 Days All Subjects Ages 18 to 59 Ages 60 to 84 100% Grade 3 Grade 2 75% Grade 1 Vaccination 1 50% Grade 0 (none) • Pain and Tenderness 25% reported most Percent of frequently 0% Participants Reporting • Rates after Dose 2 Reactogenicity 100% were higher in adjuvanted groups 75% • Reactogenicity Vaccination 2 50% attenuated in adults >60 years of 25% age 0% Placebo 5 µg + Placebo 5 µg + Placebo 5 µg + Matrix-M™ Matrix-M™ Matrix-M™ Worst grade reported for 7 days after each dose. Raw blinded data Oct 5 cut-off (pre-publication data) novavax.com 16
Phase 2 Systemic Reactogenicity: Well-tolerated Many participants experienced no reactions, and when they did occur, all were mild-to-moderate in severity with a mean duration ~2 Days All Subjects Ages 18 to 59 Ages 60 to 84 100% Grade 4 Grade 3 75% Grade 2 Vaccination 1 50% Grade 1 Grade 0 (none) 25% Percent of • Fatigue, Headache 0% and Myalgia Participants Reporting reported most 100% frequently Reactogenicity • Increased rates seen 75% in adjuvanted Vaccination 2 groups especially 50% after Dose 2 25% • Reactogenicity attenuated in adults >60 years of 0% age Placebo 5 µg + Placebo 5 µg + Placebo 5 µg + Matrix-M™ Matrix-M™ Matrix-M™ Worst grade reported for 7 days after each dose. Raw blinded data Oct 5 cut-off (pre-publication data) novavax.com 17
5µg Dose is Well-tolerated, with Strong and Consistent Responses Phase 1-2 Summary • Consistent results from Phase 1 and Phase 2 • Immunogenicity § High levels of antibody maintained through six months (Phase 1) § Antibody responses compare favorably to convalescent response • Safety § No SAEs, no AESIs, AEs balanced and mostly mild/moderate § Vaccine well-tolerated with symptoms of ~2-day duration • Confirmed 5µg dose for late-stage development novavax.com 18
NVX-CoV2373 UK Phase 3 Study novavax.com 19
UK Phase 3 Study Design Randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluating efficacy, immunogenicity and safety 5 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M™ (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) 15,000 n = ~7,500 Adults R >18 years 1:1 25% > age 65 Placebo (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) n = ~7,500 • Primary endpoint: PCR-positive symptomatic mild, moderate or severe COVID-19 illness diagnosed ≥ 7 days after second dose • LBCI >30 success criteria; with success Interim analysis, became final analysis novavax.com 20
UK 501Y.V1 Mutant Strain Increased in Prevalence During Efficacy Collection Window 20I/501Y.V1 Efficacy Endpoint Accrual: November 11 – January 1 Figure Source: nextstrain.org novavax.com 21
Primary Endpoint Met in Interim Analysis Severity NVX-CoV2373 Placebo (n=7,016) (n=7,033) Total (n=62) 6 56 Mild 1 15 Moderate 5 40 Severe 0 1 89.3% Vaccine Efficacy (95% CI: 75.2, 95.4) • Preliminary PCR data show >50% of cases attributable to UK 501Y.V1 escape variant • Final analysis to be conducted once at least 100 cases accrued Primary Endpoint: PCR-confirmed mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19 illness occurring ≥7 days after second dose in baseline seronegative participants novavax.com 22
PCR-Confirmed Mild, Moderate or Severe COVID-19 by Strain (Ancestral vs 501Y.V1 Variant) NVX-CoV2373 Placebo (n=7016) (n=7033) 501Y.V1 Ancestral Unknown 501Y.V1 Ancestral Unknown PCR-Confirmed COVID-19 4 1 1 28 23 5 (Mild, Moderate, Severe) Mild 1 0 0 5 7 3 Moderate 3 1 1 22 16 2 Severe 0 0 0 1 0 0 Post-hoc analysis based on PCR from 56 of 62 cases: 96/94% Primary/Moderate-Severe efficacy in the ancestral COVID-19 strain; 86/87% efficacy in the 501Y.V1 variant strain. novavax.com 23
Favorable Preliminary Safety Profile Event NVX-CoV2373 Placebo (n=7,016) (n=7,033) Any Severe TEAE 81 (1.1 %) 53 (0.7%) Treatment Emergent Adverse Event Any Serious TEAE 31 (0.4%) 30 (0.4%) Treatment Emergent Adverse Event Any MAAE 202 (2.7%) 201 (2.8%) Medically Attended Adverse Event Due to topline data, limited safety available novavax.com 24
NVX-CoV2373 South Africa Phase 2b Study novavax.com 25
South Africa Phase 2b Study Design Randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluating efficacy, immunogenicity and safety 5 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M™ (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) 4,400 n = ~2,200 Adults R 18-65 years 1:1 (n=245 HIV+) Placebo (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) n = ~2,200 Partner: BMGF Sponsor: Novavax • Enrollment population includes cohort of 245 randomized participants who are HIV-positive • Efficacy analysis at 23 - 50 events, LBCI success ≥0. • Primary endpoint: PCR-positive symptomatic mild, moderate or severe COVID-19 illness diagnosed ≥ 7 days after second dose novavax.com 26
South Africa 501Y.V2 Escape Mutant Dominant During Efficacy Collection Window 20H/501Y.V2 Efficacy Endpoint Accrual: November 23 – December 30 Figure Source: nextstrain.org novavax.com 27
Previous Infection Did Not Protect Against COVID Due To Variant • Volunteer sera tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG at Day 0 • ~30% had evidence of previous infection § Likely non-501Y.V2 due to enrollment timing • No difference in rates of infection/reinfection • Placebo ITT population (7 days post-dose 1), symptomatic COVID § Seronegative: 3.9% (58/1494; 2.961; 4.990): 2.3% Mod/Severe (35/1494) § Seropositive : 3.9% (26/674; 2.535; 5.601); 2.4% Mod /Severe (16/674) novavax.com 28
Cross-Protection Demonstrated Against South Africa Escape Variant NVX-CoV2373 Placebo (n=1,357) (n=1,327) Cases 15 29 Primary Endpoint Vaccine Efficacy 49.4% (95% CI: 6.1*, 72.8) Cases 11 27 HIV– 60.1% Vaccine Efficacy (95% CI: 19.9, 80.1) • Preliminary sequencing data (n=27) show 25/27 (93%) attributable to SA 501Y.V2 escape variant • 1 severe case in placebo • Success criteria: LBCI ≥0 Primary Endpoint: PCR-confirmed mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19 illness occurring ≥7days after second dose in baseline seronegative participants novavax.com 29
Comparison of PP Efficacy: Seropositive vs Seronegative Serostatus NVX-CoV2373 Placebo Efficacy % (n/N) % (n/N) (95% CI) - 1.1% (15/1357) 2.2% (29/1327) 49.4% (6.1, 72.8) + 1.2% (6/500) 2.5% (13/514) 52.6% (-23.8, 81.8) +/- 1.1% (21/1857) 2.3% (42/1841) 50.4% (16.6, 70.5) Primary – mild/moderate/severe (HIV- & HIV+) novavax.com 30
NVX-CoV2373 PREVENT-19 US & Mexico Phase 3 Study novavax.com 31
PREVENT-19 Phase 3 Trial Currently Enrolling Randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluating efficacy, immunogenicity and safety 5 µg + 50 µg Matrix-M™ (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) n = ~20,000 30,000 R Adults 2:1 >18 years Enrollment goals: Placebo 25% > age 65 years (2 injections: Day 0 and Day 21) 15% Black/African American n = ~10,000 10-20% LatinX 1-2% American Indian • Primary endpoint: PCR-positive symptomatic mild, moderate or severe COVID-19 illness diagnosed ≥ 7days after second dose • Interim analysis at 72 events, final analysis at 144 events* *Protocol version 3.0 to be updated on website novavax.com 32
PREVENT-19 Phase 3 Enrollment Update Characteristic Current Status Total Randomized 19,438 as of February 1, 2021 ≥ 65 Years 16% Black/African American 13% LatinX 16% • Enrollment expected to complete first half of February • Unblinding rate: 1.5% overall, 55% of which are ≥ 65 years • January 25: Protocol amended to incorporate blinded crossover novavax.com 33
PREVENT-19 Enrollment is in US Hotspots Higher attack rates mean: ü Increased vaccine demand & trial participation ü Faster endpoint accrual A quicker path to determining vaccine efficacy As of January 13, 2020 novavax.com 34
Variant Strains On The Rise in the US 20I/501Y.V1 First Person Dosed: December 27 Last Person Dosed: Late February https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/30/covid-coronavirus-updates/ Figure Source: nextstrain.org novavax.com 35
Booster / Bivalent Vaccine Development novavax.com 36
Variant Strains Already Under Development Against Emerging COVID-19 Mutations • To address an evolving pandemic, the optimal vaccine for all regions may need to contain multiple strains • Lab-scale manufacturing underway for multiple strains • Will be able to rapidly scale up production of additional recombinant protein vaccine candidates as new molecular entity (rS) is biochemically very similar to NVX-CoV2373 novavax.com 37
UK and SA Variants: Production in Sf9 Cells 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lane Sample rS 1 Mwt UK Variant 2 BV2425.1.1, 2.1 a UK Variant 3 BV2425.1.1, 2.1 b 4 Mwt SA Variant 5 BV2426.1.1, 2.1 a SA Variant 6 BV2426.1.1, 2.1 b Western blot anti-rS polyclonal antibody novavax.com 38
NVX-CoV2373 Manufacturing & Distribution novavax.com 39
Global Supply Chain Established Annual capacity of over 2 billion* doses starting in 2021 PolyPeptide Group AGC Biologics Novavax AB FujiFilm Par Pharma UK SK AGC Novavax CZ Bioscience Biologics Novavax Biofabri Takeda HQ MD PolyPeptide Baxter Siegfried Serum FujiFilm Group Institute FujiFilm NC TX Novavax facilities Vaccine distribution & license agreement Matrix-M™ production Antigen production Fill/Finish * When all planned capacity is online by mid-2021 novavax.com 40
Summary novavax.com 41
Two Independent Trials Demonstrate Statistically Significant Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 • Overall UK Phase 3 Vaccine Efficacy = 89.3% § Ancestral/Strain matched VE = 95.6% § UK Variant 501Y.V1 VE = 85.6% • ZA Phase 2b Vaccine Efficacy = 60.1% § Prior infection does not protect against COVID due to 501Y.V2 variant § Conversely, NVX-CoV2373 achieved protection against 501Y.V2 • Data indicate Matrix-M™-adjuvanted nanoparticle highly efficacious • Technology can rapidly adapt to make 501Y.V2 variant -rS § Candidate has been produced at lab-scale novavax.com 42
Acknowledgements • UK-Paul Heath, St Georges, London § Seth Toback, Novavax • Shabir Mahdi-University of Witswatersrand, Johannesburg § Vivek Shinde, Novavax • Filip Dubovsky, CMO, Novavax The Great team at Novavax, UK and South Africa Sincere thanks to the many volunteers novavax.com 43
novavax.com 44
NVX-CoV2373 Neutralizing RBD Epitopes Bind to Internal and External Trimer Faces NVX-CoV2373 Monoclonal Neutralizing Epitopes NVX-CoV2373 Polyclonal IgG Epitopes RBD RBD RBD RBD Zost, et al., Nature, 2020 Greany, et al., bioRxiv, 2021 Ward, et al. Scripps, 2021 novavax.com 45
You can also read