EDUCATION WITHOUT COMPROMISE - January 2008 EDUCATION SECTOR REVIEW COMMISSION
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
EDUCATION WITHOUT COMPROMISE EDUCATION SECTOR REVIEW COMMISSION January 2008
CONTENTS Pg. No. ABBREVIATIONS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PREFACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER I: Bhutan's Development of Education CHAPTER II: Early Childhood Care and Education CHAPTER III: Universal Primary Education CHAPTER IV: Status of Primary Education CHAPTER V: Factors Influencing Learning Achievement in Primary Education CHAPTER VI: Secondary Education CHAPTER VII: School Culture: An Overlooked Dimension for Improvement CHAPTER VIII: Tertiary Education CHAPTER IX: Impact of the Education System on Human Resources Development CHAPTER X: Transforming the Education System CHAPTER XI: Establishing Indicators for Quality Education CHAPTER XII: Timeframe for Pursuing Recommendations ANNEX 1: Executive Order for Establishment of Education Sector Review Commission ANNEX 2: Reflections on Education Quality in Bhutan ANNEX 3 The Heart Essence of Education in Bhutan 2
Abbreviations ATD Agency for Teacher Development BCSE Bhutan Certificate for Secondary Examination BE Bachelor of Engineering BHSEC Bhutan Higher Secondary Education Certificate BNHRD Bhutan National Human Resource Development Report CBSE Central Board of Secondary Education DEO District Education Officer Dzongkhag District ECCD Early Childhood Care and Development ECCE Early Childhood Care and Education EFA Education For All EMSSD Education Monitoring and Support Services, MoE, Bhutan GER Gross Enrolment Ratio HSS Higher Secondary School ISCED International Standard Classification of Education JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency LSS Lower Secondary School MBBS Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery MDGs Millennium Development Goals MLL Minimum Levels of Learning MoE Ministry of Education MoLHR Ministry of Labour and Human Resources MSS Middle Secondary School NEA National Examination Assessment, Bhutan NER Net Enrolment Ratio NFE Non-Formal Education OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PP Pre-primary SMB School Management Board UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UPE Universal Primary Education 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In pursuit of a decision by the Council of Ministers, the Hon’ble Prime Minister issued an Executive Order on 1 November 2006 establishing a 10-member Education Sector Review Commission to examine Bhutan’s education sector. This was to serve as “a comprehensive sector-wide reform and development measure.” At the outset, therefore, we wish to convey our most sincere gratitude to the Council of Ministers for the confidence reposed in us to undertake this very important review. This was the first comprehensive review of its kind, and the task was heavy. Nevertheless, we hope that despite any shortcomings in the report, we have not failed in setting a precedent for such timely reviews of the most important sector in the Royal Government – education. During our yearlong tenure, this Commission was privileged to have interactions with scores of people, too numerous to mention by name. To all those who generously shared their views and experiences, we extend our heartfelt thanks. We would like to express appreciation to all students and teachers in 13 districts and more than 30.schools who participated in the survey. We hope that our report will give voice to their honest expressions and their pleas for intervention to optimise their teaching/learning experiences. We also would like to extend our gratitude to the head teachers, principals and teachers, staff and District Education Officers and Education Monitoring Officers who kindly facilitated our work and shared their perceptions and experiences. Our own insights and understanding of the day-to-day struggles, triumphs and hopes in the schools were sensitised by the articulation of all those who shared the larger collective experience of Bhutanese education. We were overwhelmed by the interest, concern and goodwill shown by numerous people for improvement of the quality of education in the country. Gratitude is expressed to those teachers, parents and concerned citizens, expatriates, consultants and scholars in Bhutan, as well as those outside the country, who shared their time, experiences and expert insights. We extend special thanks to those who went out of their way to write papers incorporated in the Commission’s report, voluntarily or on request. Special mention must be made of Dr. David Fulton, Assistant Director of the Office of School Character and Culture in the Denver Public Schools in Denver, Colorado, in the United States, who came to Bhutan to assist the Commission pro bono. He was with the Commission for an entire month and helped to conduct and analyse the study on school culture. Our work would have not been possible without the confidence and continuous encouragement we received from Dasho Dr. Pema Thinley, former Secretary of Education. We are gratified by the interest shown in our work by the present Secretary of Education, Aum Sangay Zam. Thanks are extended to Mr. Tsewang Tandin, Director of the Department of School Education, who eased our logistical and official procedures within the education system. Gratitude also is due to Dasho Zangley Dukpa, former Vice Chancellor of the Royal University of Bhutan, and Dr. Jagar Dorji, former Director of Sherubtse College, who helped us to sharpen our focus on higher education. Mr. Rinchen Samdrup, Planning Officer in the Ministry of Education, and Ms. Tshering Wangmo, are likewise gratefully acknowledged for facilitating financial and budgetary matters and for organisational and secretarial support respectively. 4
PREFACE Although we have made rapid strides in the fields of education and human resources development, there is still a long way to go before our nation is equipped with the human resources required to sustain the process of development. The nation’s skills base is extremely narrow, and just over one-half of our population can be considered literate and numerate. Although we can draw satisfaction from the rapid growth in primary and secondary school enrolment, the high dropout and repeater rates provide genuine cause for concern. Less then one-half of all those who enter primary school actually complete primary education, while less than 40 percent of young people of secondary school age are actually in secondary education, and a large number will fail to complete it. Bhutan 2020 A Vision for Peace, Prosperity and Happiness Since the release of the Bhutan 2020 vision document in 1999, considerable progress has been made in expanding schooling and tertiary education in the country. The number of schools, educational institutes and centres reached 1,666 by 2007, with a student population of 189,259 (excluding Bhutanese students outside the country). Nevertheless, this Commission has anticipated that, as in many developing counties, issues of efficiency, quality and learner achievement will grow – but with the right kinds of inputs, these issues can be resolved within the system we already have. There was, however, no way the Commission could have fathomed the depth and complexity of challenges emanating from the current status of education and human resources: 1. Bhutan is a young country, with 59 percent of its population younger than 25; 42 percent below 15; and 30 percent younger than 10. Given such demographic characteristics, youth unemployment, already estimated at 3 percent in 2005, seems inevitable. Paradoxically, however, there exists a shortage of skilled manpower in every sector of the economy. As such, youth unemployment – often a result of poor schooling – is a matter of the highest concern. For every 100 PP children only around 85 continue to lower secondary level (Classes VII and VIII), and an even smaller number studies further. Discontinuation of education leads to an accumulation of job seekers at the bottom of the education pyramid, as well as the immediate fallout of low skills levels among the working youth population. Reversing that skills deficit requires nothing less than reinventing the system. 2. Bhutan also is on the cusp of joining the World Trade Organization, and in the new dynamics of globalisation, a national workforce will need strong skills in mathematics, science and technology, and literacy. Moreover, this is not just for top professionals and managers: Such needs will extend through the length and breadth of the workforce. By 2010, even India will require additional skilled manpower amounting to 8,50,000. Even more surprisingly, by 2020 the shortage of skilled 5
3. professionals is expected to reach 40 million in developed countries. 1 Thus, the inescapable conclusion is that the quality of education of a work force will matter even more than the quantity. Indeed, a study undertaken in the United State shows that a difference of one standard deviation in mathematic and science scores is related to a 1 percent difference in annual per-capita GDP growth. It is, therefore, alarming that Bhutan has neither a large enough workforce nor one that is well-endowed educationally or with regard to skills. If the current educational trends continue, by the end of the Tenth Five Year Plan in 2013, 51 percent of Bhutan’s labour force, at best, will have acquired primary education. Given the above circumstances, what is the way forward? To begin with, we must get it right from the start, taking an important initiative toward qualitative and systemic improvements in education. To put it simply, we must pursue “Education Without Compromise.” This represents a call for: 1. Urgently transforming the education system to achieve radical improvements in educational outputs of Bhutanese students. Such goal-setting draws its aspiration from His Majesty the King’s address to the graduates of 2007: “It is no longer enough to say, ‘I am the best in Bhutan, ” His Majesty declared. “I expect you to be the best wherever you go in this world.” Moreover, this goal forces the necessary thinking about how to achieve quantum improvements in students’ academic achievements. But urgency is imperative; urgency is about execution. 2. Integrating the linkages among early childhood care and education, primary, secondary and non-formal education. While much can be done within each of these components, a great deal more can be accomplished through an across- the-board integration of efforts. In the process, this will build a sound foundation for improving the quality of tertiary education. 1 1 & 2 Educate the Masses, Times of India, October 9, 2007 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY If present trends continue, at the end of the Tenth Five Year Plan (2013) the level of education of 51 percent of the nation’s workforce will be at or below Class VI – even as the economy further integrates into the globalised world. This is, however, a world in which a very high level of preparation in reading, writing, mathematics, science and literature will be indispensable for most members of the workforce. Thus, every working person in future generations will have to be much more productive than this generation, and children more productive than their parents. The challenge is not just about reversing trends in the education system: To quote His Majesty the King, we will “have to build a strong education system.” After extensively reviewing the education system, this Commission hopes that “Education Without Compromise” can help to create such a system that will educate Bhutanese students to world-class levels. Overall, Bhutan has made great strides in education since its initiation in the country some four decades ago. At the same time, many issues remain to be addressed. We found, for example, that only 215 Bhutanese children are benefiting from the crucial intervention of Early Childhood Care and Education, even though high-quality ECCE is one of the best investments a nation can make in its young people. No national policy currently exists in the country on ECCE. The concept of pre-primary, or “PP,” in the country contrasts with international standards by tending strongly toward formal school experience – it is actually part of primary education – rather than developing school readiness. Significant efforts will be needed to achieve University Primary Education by 2015; this will mean, at a minimum, enrolling all children of the officially prescribed age (6 years) in the 2009 school year. But this will not be easy, for numerous reasons: About 16,500 children of primary school age remain out of school, with primary dropout and repetition rates encompassing more than 10 percent of students. All this adds to illiteracy and indicates a high level of children who are not mastering the curriculum. Alarmingly, mean test scores in literacy and numeracy are very low, and the “learning rate” is so slow that an extra year in each grade is required to reach the average competency for that grade. Urban students’ better performance in all areas means that the system must be made more effective in reducing inequalities of educational opportunity. Turning to secondary education (lower, middle and higher secondary as a whole), the situation is similar but challenges are even more pronounced. Barely 85 out of every 100 students enrolled in primary education progress to lower and middle secondary school – and of the latter, only a smaller number proceeds to higher secondary. Gender differences begin to show up, and average Class X test scores in English and maths are startlingly low. Only around 35 percent of Class XII students score high enough to be selected for admission to tertiary institutes – yet the cut off point is usually even lower than 60 percent, itself considered the bare minimum for satisfactory performance. At all levels, learning occurs within what this Commission found to be a “culture of passivity”. We strongly urge shifting from a culture of fear to a culture of engagement in classrooms; creating a culture of reading in schools; and strengthening both teacher in-service training and access to best practices. In tertiary education, we found that Sherubtse College, the pinnacle of learning in the country, appears at risk of sliding into becoming a mediocre institution. In general, students 7
do not seem fully engaged in learning, working only hard enough to score the 40 percent needed to pass. Accountability is weak for lecturers and students alike. Many buildings and classrooms are in disrepair, and faculty trust and professional morale are both low. Quality assurance of tertiary education as a whole is constrained by the fact that tertiary institutions’ missions are not well-aligned with long-term human resource development needs of the country, including that of the private sector, and that institutions suffer an acute shortage of qualified teaching staff, with no agreed performance indicators. Expansion of the pilot Continuing Education Programme is an urgent priority; high costs in so doing may be offset by “piggybacking” on educational and training services for adults in India. The overwhelming conclusion from these analyses is that radical improvement is indispensable to achieve a quantum improvement in educational outputs and strengthen competitiveness of Bhutan’s economy in the globalised world. Bearing this in mind, this Commission has proposed seven strategies aimed at building a sound framework to educate Bhutanese to world-class levels. Intended to stimulate debate on the quality of education in the country, these recommendations have been drawn from reports and best practices of nations around the world with the best education systems. The seven strategies are: Strategy 1: Adopt international benchmarks for educating Bhutanese students and establish achievement levels against those standards. Adopting International Standards This would involve: • Setting the standards of the board examinations, namely, BCSC for Class X and BHSEC for Class XII at the expectations incorporated in the examinations administered by the best-performing nations in the world such as Singapore and Finland. • Overhauling the school curriculum including the current system of accessing students’ achievements to best fit the expectations mentioned above. Establishing students’ achievement levels In primary education, the above would involve drawing from the concept incorporated in the Minimum Levels of Learning model of India. In secondary education, a new BCSE examination for Class X would be established at international standards, with students able to take the test repeatedly. Results of the BCSE would lead to two “streaming” programmes to be created at higher secondary level, an Upper Secondary Academic Programme, providing demanding college preparation courses, and a Technical Preparation Programme, allowing students to sample a range of technical and occupational programmes. This would provide an opportunity for less capable students to develop at their own pace. A new BHSEC for Class XII at international expectations also would be established in order to qualify for enrolment in tertiary education. 8
Strategy 2: Improve teachers’ quality by transforming their compensation system and restructuring teacher recruitment and education. Teachers’ salaries would be performance-based, as measured against students’ test achievements; this would mean moving away from compensation based on years of service. Teachers also could be tested every five years, with those who fail at risk of losing their jobs. Extra compensation would be provided for senior and experienced teachers willing to be posted in remote areas or in schools where there are recruiting problems, as well as for those willing to teach in subject areas with shortages, such as mathematics and science. Creation of an autonomous Agency for Teacher Development (ATD), vested with a mission to recruit and retain the best and brightest as teachers, would allow teachers to be de-linked from the civil service. Offering salaries at levels comparable to better-paid professionals in the country, the ATD could recruit candidates from the Government, army, or good teachers who had gone on to other careers. It would reinstate the practice of recruiting expatriate teachers as “permanent employees,” rather than on short-term contracts. Lastly, the ATD could write performance contracts with the two Colleges of Education for training of teacher trainees, and could cancel these contracts if trainees do not meet performance criteria. Strategy 3: Provide high-quality, universal Early Childhood Education. Urgent policy and operational decisions should be taken to develop a national policy on Early Childhood Care and Education, including adopting an ECCE curriculum possibly based on the Singapore model. De-linking pre-primary (PP) from primary education would keep all young children aged 3 to 6 years out of the formal education sphere; participation of 3- and 4-year-olds in pre-primary education could be voluntary, but should be mandatory for 5- and 6-year-olds in order to enroll in Class I. Ideally, the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children would be covered by the entire four-year programme. Criteria for ECCE staff should be established, and community-based programmes may be considered. Coverage and quality of Non-Formal Education (NFE) should be increased, targeted at the poorest young mothers, in recognition of the fact that educated mothers serve as a “multiplier” for children’s education. Strategy 4: Achieve Universal Primary Education. Efforts toward achieving UPE can be targeted toward out-of-school children, by coming up with a programme specifically designed to attract and retain these children in school; creation of a comprehensive database for analysing dropout, retention, survival and completion rates and producing “school report cards;” and to benefit the poorest families, elimination of the requirements of school uniforms and payment of fees in all primary schools, ensuring free access to textbooks and school stationery, and covering every primary school under the School Feeding Programme. Improved “learning gains” could be made by reactivating the National Students’ Service (NSS) to run remedial education programmes in primary schools 9
for children who are lagging in their studies. Volunteers in the reactivated NSS would be chosen from top recent college graduates (based on criteria such as their academic performance and aptitudes toward voluntary services) and would be paid generous allowances; following completion of two years of service, they would be given preferred recruitment in the civil service and/or awarded a fellowship for higher studies abroad. Strategy 5: Create high-performance schools based on the best systems of governance, finance, organisation and management. Radically changing the reality of school bureaucracies can help to create high-performance schools in Bhutan. Drawing from global best practices, it will be important for the Ministry of Education (MoE) to provide leadership and support toward this end, through establishing school accountability without micromanaging. This can be achieved by empowering schools administratively and financially, as well as strengthening high-quality technical assistance from MoE. Relevant officials, including Dzongkhag Education Officers, would be given the mission to create a positive climate of respect and trust between schools and education headquarters, communicating clear goals and expectations and functioning as service organisations that see schools and students as “clients.” Involvement of parents and communities in school performance should be strengthened, in part focusing School Management Boards on policy rather than operational issues. Strategy 6: Support students who need it most. Following a detailed screening assessment, a school intervention process could be developed that helps students to stay on track and at grade level. This could include tutoring, “double scheduling” in target areas, and other initiatives. Provisions could be created for access to after-school extended day programming as well as mentors, along with health and social services at or near schools to increase the chances of students being healthy and ready to learn. In some cases, establishment of residential schools may be necessary to best support these students. Strategy 7: Ensure quality assurance of higher education. This can be achieved through integration of the primary, secondary and higher education systems in the country into a seamless whole, linking academic, professional and vocational programmes and making the education system globally responsive. Alignment of the system to long-term human resources and development perspectives, making graduates “fit for market,” will be critical. Clear guidelines and relationships should be established between MoE and the Royal University of Bhutan, or other appropriate bodies, with regard to regulation and coordination of higher education. Guidelines also are required on membership for tertiary education institutions in the Royal University of Bhutan, including future private 10
higher education facilities. To ensure “the right education at the right time,” MoE, the Royal University of Bhutan and other tertiary education institutions should maintain strategic alliances with other human resources development partners such as the Ministry of Labour and Human Resources, the Royal Civil Service Commission and private sector bodies. Cooperation and collaboration with other quality assurance systems must be encouraged. 11
CHAPTER I: Bhutan’s Development of Education Education has been the central player in the transformation of Bhutan from a traditional society to a dynamic, confident participant in regional and global affairs. The provision and promotion of free education has been part of the success story of Bhutan’s effort to make education accessible to all its citizens. The primary enrolment rate stands at about 83 percent. With the establishment of the Royal University of Bhutan (RUB), the educational destiny of the country is taking a further new turn. The main goals of Bhutan’s education sector have been to: • Provide basic cost-effective and sustainable education to all Bhutanese, equipping citizens with basic literacy skills and functional knowledge and values within the Bhutanese cultural context • Provide general secondary education on a selective basis, helping to build the necessary human capacity for further specialised education and training in science, technology, business and education, among others • Provide higher education in selected fields, preparing key people to deliver and continuously upgrade services and industries in the country, as well as to enable Bhutan to engage in the continuous search for knowledge • Establish an enabling environment imparting wholesome education to children and youth • Provide opportunities, especially for those who have missed out on formal education, to attain basic and functional literacy through non-formal and adult literacy programmes • Promote a system of continuous and lifelong learning At the heart of the Bhutanese education system is the desire to integrate the best in our cherished cultural and national values with the best in modern knowledge and technological developments from abroad, harnessing them to serve the best interests of the country. Bhutan’s current formal education structure consists of seven years of primary schooling (Classes Pre-Primary to VI), along with six years of secondary education, comprising two years of lower secondary (Classes VII-VIII), two years of middle secondary (Classes IX-X), and two years of higher secondary (Classes XI-XII). This is followed by three years of undergraduate programmes in the country’s tertiary institutes, with smaller numbers of students going abroad for professional and postgraduate studies. The recent establishment of the Royal University of Bhutan is expected to cater to Bhutan’s higher education needs and aspirations. Enrolment Patterns and Changes in Basic Education In the early 1950s, modern education was a totally new concept, far different from the traditional monastic education system, where education and religious studies were seen as synonymous. In the beginning, schools were few and far between, making it necessary for the Royal Government to send many students to boarding schools in India. Most parents 12
were particularly hesitant to send their daughters away to school; over the years, such hesitancy has diminished, however. Thus, female enrolment is today nearly at par with male enrolment, at least at the primary level. Until the 1970s, Class VI represented the basic education level. As the country advanced, the requirements changed; by 1996, basic education had been raised to Class VIII. In 1999 this level was further raised to Class X, meaning that all Bhutanese can receive free education until that level with Royal Government support. Further education is highly selective and needs-based. Non-Formal and Continuing Education Programmes In spite of strong progress in education since planned development began in the country barely four decades ago, many people in remote corners of our country have missed the opportunity of attending school. The Ministry of Education has therefore established a vigorous programme of Non-Formal and Continuing Education to provide basic education opportunities to disadvantaged sections of the population. Today there exist about 400 non-formal education (NFE) centres, spread across all 20 dzongkhags and covering some 18,000 adult women and men – about 70 percent of the adult illiterate population. What is especially encouraging is that the percentage of women in NFE programmes is more than twice that of men. Traditional Values and IT Bhutan’s identity is imbued with a value system anchored in the spiritual legacy of the country. What the Education Department recognises as “wholesome education” is a goal of cultivating the personal, academic, intellectual, psychological, emotional, spiritual, social and occupational dimensions of all Bhutanese children so that they grow up well-balanced, properly integrated and sensitive human beings. In all, the expectation is that children will grow up to be an asset to themselves as well as to society at large. The country also has come a long way in ensuring a national teaching force. Today there are more than 6,000 educators, a dramatic change from the early 1960s, when there were barely 40. Bhutan now has a commendable teacher-student ratio of 1:32. In recent years, Bhutan has particularly recognised the importance of integrating the tools of Information Technology into the education system; the intent is to bring the knowledge and information available around the world into our classrooms. In an age of “information explosion,” and as Bhutan becomes an increasingly knowledge-based society; the benefits made available through modern technology hardly need emphasising. 13
Looking Ahead Education will continue receiving a high priority in the development policy of the Royal Government as it pursues the goals of improving citizens’ quality of life as well as enhancing the human resources to meet the country’s needs. More specifically, the thrust of the education sector will be in: • Expansion of basic education to cover the entire population • Improvement of the quality and relevance of education to address the holistic development of the child, including innate abilities, social cohesion, national imperatives and the world of work, encompassing agriculture and other vocations • Development of a highly motivated and competent teaching cadre that supports a holistic approach to education and learning • Utilisation of educational innovations and new technologies to increase access to education and improve its quality • Development of private schools to allow for greater choice in curricula and teaching-learning approaches, as well as lessen to the resource burden on the Royal Government and allow it to focus on improving Government schools, among others As Bhutan looks increasingly beyond its national boundaries for access to global knowledge and skills, education will continue providing it with the leverage to propel itself forward. The Advent of the University The country’s desire for a place in the intellectual arena came to fulfilment on 2 June 2003, when the Royal University of Bhutan was established, coinciding with the celebration of the 29th anniversary of the coronation of His Majesty Druk Gyalpo Jigme Singye Wangchuck, the fourth hereditary Monarch of Bhutan. Comprising existing colleges and institutes that are expected to grow into centres of excellence, the university will include major functions of knowledge development, personnel development and provision of services, among others. More specifically, it will: • Institute programmes of studies and granting of degrees, including postgraduate and doctorate • Create qualified human resources to serve the professional sector of the fast- expanding economy • Monitor course quality and teaching effectiveness in member institutions • Establish criteria for and accredit member institutions • Coordinate exchange and sharing of resources among member institutions • Oversee development and delivery of relevant curricula • Guide the direction, dimension and quality of higher education in the country 14
It is hoped that the Royal University of Bhutan will embody the true tradition of higher education. Concerns and Challenges The Royal Government has not only is deeply committed to providing free basic education to all Bhutanese children, but it also has signed the international Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Education for All document. Likewise, it has created a wide network of schools and non-formal education centres across the country. Enrolment has grown so rapidly, however, that has become difficult to cope with the demand – and quality is often at stake. Concern has been expressed at all levels of society over a perceived decline in standards of education, with student performance particularly worrisome in mathematics, languages and the sciences. In addition, it is widely believed that the quality of teachers leaves much to be desired; that leadership needs to be more inspiring; that curriculum should maintain a desirable level of integrity; that values need to be practised rather than talked about; and a host of other issues that affect education. Especially in a country like Bhutan, with a small population, every citizen needs to be properly educated. Research and development are crucial to the education process. To this end, the newly instituted, independent Royal Education Council is expected to render counsel and support to the Ministry of Education. Education Sector Review Commission In view of the system-wide concerns over education quality, the Royal Government of Bhutan decided to institute a 10-member National Education Sector Review Commission to examine the state of education and recommend actions to address the problem. The Executive Order issued by the Honourable Prime Minister on 1 November 2006 requires the Commission to conduct a comprehensive study of the system as per the Terms of Reference and submit the report to the Government within one year. Overall, the state of the nation’s education system is as revealing as it is worrying. However, since education is founded on the principles of hope and achievement, there exists legitimate reason to be confident that with the correct measures in place, the system can be as robust and efficient as we all wish it to be. 15
CHAPTER II: Early Childhood Care and Education Why Does ECCE Matter? In the international context, the first goal of the Education For All Dakar Framework for Action 2000 calls for “expanding and improving comprehensive early childhood care and education, especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children.” Moreover, UNICEF has declared that the international community should award far greater recognition to the role of ECCE in a broader global anti-poverty strategy, stating: “Reaching the Millennium Development Goals and reducing poverty depends on efforts to support young children’s rights to health, education, protection and equality. Holistic ECCE can make a major difference in reducing poverty and hunger (MDG1) and child mortality (MDG4), and can help combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases (MDG6)” (UNICEF, 2003). In addition, extensive global research has concluded: • Early intervention is crucial: it is far more challenging and costly to compensate for educational and social disadvantages among older children and adults than to provide preventative measures and support in early childhood (UNESCO) • Children from the poorest backgrounds benefit most from ECCE provision in term of care, education and health • Developing ECCE programmes while improving the functioning of primary schools is likely to result in more timely entry into the school system and less grade repetition, thus allowing additional enrolment • High-quality early childhood education is one of the best investments a nation can make in its young people It should come as no surprise, then, that OECD countries provide children with access to at least two years of free ECCE before they begin primary school. Defining ECCE According to UNESCO, ECCE refers to a wide range of programmes “all aimed at physical, cognitive and social development of children before they enter primary school – theoretically, from birth to about age 7 or 8.” Such programmes, it adds, “contribute to good child development outcomes that set the foundation for lifelong learning and help in the monitoring of health and nutrition status during this critical period of development.” (EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007) Broadly, ECCE programme can be grouped as follows: a) Home Care programmes cater to children up to age 2 years. The term “care” in this context encompasses “attention to health, hygiene and nutrition within a nurturing and safe environment that supports children’s cognitive and socio-emotional well being.” (UNESCO) 16
Such care can be best given in a familiar and natural environment – the home. However, changes in family structure and increased employment of women have led to the establishment of day care facilities (crèches) for infants and toddlers. b) Early Childhood Education programmes cater to children aged 3 to 6 years. In addition to providing “care,” such programmes include organised learning or early childhood education. It should be noted, however, “education” in the early childhood years is much broader than schooling, capturing learning through early stimulation, guidance and a range of developmental activities and opportunities. In practice, care and education cannot be separated, and good-quality provision for young children necessarily addresses both dimensions. (UNESCO). The International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) defines pre-primary education under ECCE as ISCED Level 0, compromising programmes that offer structured, purposeful learning activities in a centre (as oppose to the home) to children aged at least 3 years. (UNESCO, 1977) Such programmes are normally held to include organised, experience-based learning activities. In particular, they encourage school readiness through: • Physical well-being and motor development • Social and emotional development • Approaches to learning • Language development • Cognition and general knowledge The Current Situation in Bhutan No national policy currently exists in Bhutan on ECCE (also known as Early Childhood Care and Development, or ECCD). Pending formulation of this policy, “the Government has allowed some private-sector initiatives through the establishment of nursery schools in the larger urban centres. These schools require the payment of fees and, consequently, are attended mostly by the children of more well-to-do parents” (Education Sector Strategy, 2003). The above is reflected in the current status of ECCD (also known as ECCE, or Early Childhood Care and Education) in the country: • Six daycare centres, mostly in Thimphu, Punakha, Paro and Phuentsholing, are providing 2 to 3 years of preschool education for about 200 3- to 5-year-olds. Clearly, the needs of only a very small proportion of young children are being met this way. • Several issues also exist concerning the daycare programmes, including staff training; state of the centres’ physical environment, including availability of appropriate play and educational equipment; and clarity of curriculum goals. It also appears that all six centres are struggling for financial sustainability. 17
‘Pre-Primary’: A Distinctive Approach At the same time, in Bhutan the General Education Curriculum includes one year of pre- primary (PP) as well as Classes I to VI. Notwithstanding the designation PP, “pre-primary” in the country is “very much formal schooling,” in contrast to international expectations, it has been found. 2 The Review of Primary Education (Department of Education/UNICEF/SDC) commented that in most PP classes: The aim of the teachers seems to be to get [the children] onto the readers, formal arithmetic and book work as quickly as possible, so that they will be ready for Class I. The Pre-Primary grade does not function as preschool (as intended) but seems to be already Class I, so that the primary education in Bhutan in fact lasts for seven years. As such, “PP experiences” are formal school experiences because of the widely held notion that it should prepare children for Class I. Conclusion 1. Little planning has been done for preschool education and care of Bhutanese children, as shown by the low numbers involved nationwide. This is particularly unfortunate, given that children from households with no literate parents are in greatest need of preschool education. 2. Conceptually, a distinction needs to be made between the ISCED Level 0 concept of “pre-primary education” and the much-misunderstood Bhutanese concept of “PP.” In practice, the latter is intended to prepare children for Class I, whereas broadly, pre- primary education under ECCE is intended primarily to promote children’s holistic development. 2 Mark Bray, UNESCO consultant, The Costs and Finance of Primary Schools in Bhutan. 18
CHAPTER III: Universal Primary Education The goals and processes for achieving Bhutan’s aspirations in the education sector are defined in the “Education Sector Strategy: Realising the Vision 2020” (see Box 1). This strategy forms the basics for achieving Universal Primary Education (UPE) by 2015 under the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and for achieving the fundamental goal of equity under the Dakar Declaration (see Box 2). Box 1: Education Sector Strategy: Realising the Vision 2020, Bhutan The Education Sector Strategy articulates how Bhutan will achieve its long-term vision in the education sector as part of wider national development principles that address the country’s unique needs and priorities for attaining Gross National Happiness. The Vision 2020 document provides the following milestones for the sector: Universal Primary Enrolment (UPE) - 2007 Full enrolment of junior high school (Class VIII) - 2007 Full enrolment of high school (Class X) - 2012 Full adaptation of secondary school curricula to the Bhutanese context - 2007 Student competencies equivalent to average level by international standards - 2010 Student competencies equivalent to excellence level by international standards - 2020 International standards - 2020 Introduction of an operational distance education programme - 2007 Full adult literacy - 2012 Source: Ministry of Education, 2003 UPE means “that all children of primary-school participate in the school system and complete primary school” (EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007). So that all Bhutanese children are becoming “primary graduates” by 2015, this requires: (a) beginning pre-primary (PP) enrolment of all children for the academic session 2009 at the officially prescribed age, i.e., 6 years; and (b) the acquisition of these children of basic skills – reading, writing and numeracy – and their progression from PP to Class VI within a national time frame of 7 years. This further implies that the school system will have the capacity to accommodate entire cohorts of children, as well as to provide a quality education. In other words, for UPE quantitative and qualitative objectives are inseparable. Achieving Gender Parity Gender disparity in primary school enrolment is characteristic of many countries with low overall enrolment. Thus, with its Gender Parity Index of 83.9 percent for boys and 83.5 percent for girls (2007), Bhutan’s progress in achieving gender parity in primary education is commendable, reflecting little if any discrimination against girls’ enrolment in school. This is an important factor in achieving UPE; the latter by definition calls for gender parity. At the secondary, there is a decline in girls’ participation, however. 19
Box 2: The Dakar Framework for Action and Millennium Development Goals Education For All Dakar Goals 1. Expanding and improving comprehensive early childhood care and education, especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children 2. Ensuring that by 2015 all children, particularly belonging to ethnic minorities, have access to complete free and compulsory primary education of good quality 3. Ensuring that the learning needs of all young people and adults are met through equitable access to appropriate learning and life skills programmes 4. Achieving a 50 percent improvement in levels of adult literacy by 2015, especially for women, and equitable access to basic and continuing education for all adults 5. Eliminating gender disparities in primary and secondary education by 2005 and achieving gender equality in education by 2015, with a focus on ensuring girls’ full and equal access to (and achievement in) basic education of good quality 6. Improving all aspects of the quality of education and ensuring excellence of all so that recognised and measurable learning outcomes are achieved by all, especially in literacy, numeracy and essential life skills Millennium Development Goals Goal 2. Achieve universal primary education Target 3: Ensure that by 2015 children everywhere, boys and girls alike, will be able to complete a full course of primary schooling Goal 3. Promote gender equality and empower women Target 4: Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education, preferably by 2005, and at all levels of education no later than 2015 Source: UNESCO Bhutan’s Status on Enrolment Enrolment is the measurable indicator of progress toward UPE. In 2006-2007, the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) and Net Enrolment Ratio (NER) in primary education were 105 percent and 83 percent respectively. What does this imply? 20
• A total of 105 percent GER is not necessarily a sign of progress toward UPE, although it indicates that the school system has the quantitative capacity to enroll all children at the official age; some schools are resorting to a “shift system” to accommodate the increased numbers. Even so, in many Bhutanese schools – particularly in rural areas – it appears that strong moves will be necessary for UPE to be achieved: 65 percent of enrolment is concentrated in urban and semi-urban areas, which comprise only 35 percent of schools. • Meanwhile, an NER at or near 100 percent implies UPE; thus, an NER of 83 percent may give an impression that the country is on track toward this goal. However, a progression from 83 percent to 100 percent is not straightforward, since the last 15 to 20 percent of school-age cohorts usually include the hardest-to-reach children. Moreover, their background characteristics are such that they require specifically prepared polices and programmes to attract and retain them in school. Ironically, Bhutan’s relatively high and stable NER since 2001-2002 is actually a sign of how difficult it is proving to enrol this category of children. In other words, even in purely quantitative terms, achieving UPE requires “out-of-the-box” initiatives. Out-of-School Children The enrolment figure for 2007 shows that 16.3 percent, or 16,500, primary-age children (6- 12 years) are out of formal schooling. (Some of these children could be studying in monistic institutes or in school abroad. Some of them may join the formal schooling after the officially prescribed age) As noted above, the background characteristics and needs of these children are different: • Even when primary education is “free,” according to a UNICEF survey, families have to bear costs over a six-month period of Nu.1,729 per pupil for uniforms, school food, fees and other contributions. These expenses can and do act as a major deterrent for poor households in enrolling or retaining children in primary education. • Similarly, “economic compulsion” was found by the report Toward a Pro-Poor Development Strategy for Bhutan 2005 as a key reason why “Bhutan is still some way behind the goal of universal primary education.” This report added: “… persistent poverty of the household, rather than access to schooling facilities, now remains the major stumbling block toward achieving the goal of universal primary education.” • Lastly, UPE’s central concern is equity in learning outcomes, access and retentions – but it is not enough to simply bring education services closer to the doorstep of the hardest-to-reach. Instead, it requires initiating targeted polices and programmes that can rescue families, many of them rural, who are caught in an intergenerational poverty trap. “Children born in poor families cannot always avail of the educational opportunities open to them,” researchers found. “And lack of education condemns them to a life of poverty for themselves and their own children in future.”(Toward a Pro-Poor Development Strategy for Bhutan 2005) 21
CHAPTER IV: Status of Primary Education Bhutan’s status and quality of primary education have been assessed through the key determinants of retention, grade repetition and learners’ academic achievements. Retention Based on data for the last six years (2001-2002 through 2006-2007), the following characterises the situation regarding primary school dropouts: • On average, the primary school dropout rate (during the six year period) was 2.87 percent per grade annually. As many as 3,621 children did not complete five years of schooling. This adds to the illiterate population of the country, given that the Royal Government has declared that “five years of education is required to ensure literacy and numeracy. Children leaving earlier are still illiterate.” 3 • More than 2,240 children drop out (during the six year period) after reaching the last primary grade, and cohort completion rates are lower than survival rates. Thus, the number of years of schooling is a practically useful but conceptually dubious proxy for the processes that take place there and the outcomes that result. Consequently, the latter provides a better way of judging the condition of primary education. • Returns may be insignificant for children who drop out after, for example, a couple of unsuccessful years of school attendance, compared with those that a complete primary education would bring. Reducing drop out rates is, therefore, crucial. Grade Repetition Grade repetition appears a hallmark of the primary education system, in spite of a non- detention directive by the Ministry of Education and anecdotal evidence suggesting overly lenient awarding of marks under the Continuous Assessment system. This is mirrored in the repetition status for 2001-2002 through 2006-2007: • The repetition rate, on average, stood at 8.5 percent per grade annually, indicating the proportion of children who are not mastering the curriculum. A high level of grade repetition is a sign of a dysfunctional school system, exacerbating the dropout and resulting in overcrowded schools. • In primary education, Grade IV has had the highest repetition rate every year since 2001-2002. As will be discussed below, this could be due to a low level of overall “learning gain.” • Surprisingly, even in PP the repetition rate is 10.3 percent per year, in large part because many young children are being enrolled in PP before they are age 6. This results in a highly “uneven” age group of PP pupils. It also represents a further 3 MoE, General Statistics 2007. All data in this chapter are from MoE General Statistics 2006 and 2007. 22
signal that ECCE for children younger than 6 has not been given the attention it merits. • The rate of grade repetition is one indicator for measuring the efficiency of the education system, given that repetition is equivalent to an additional year of participation per child. Accordingly, where grade repetition is high some improvements in quality may be largely self-financing, simply by reducing the average time completers spend in school. Academic Achievement A major objective of all educational systems is learners’ cognitive development, and the degree to which a system actually achieves this is one indicator of quality. An important measure of the latter is represented by test scores, which helps to assess learners’ achievements. Bearing this in mind, the following summarises the findings of (a) the 2003 National Education Assessment (NEA) in the core subjects of English (literacy) and numeracy for Class VI, and (b) a 2007 World Bank education quality survey of primary schools in Bhutan (Classes II and IV): A. NEA Findings: 1. The mean test scores were 23.08 out of 50 in numeracy and 26 out of 50 in literacy. 2. Boys outperformed girls in numeracy (see below). In addition, those who liked mathematics tended to do well in the subject. Gender Numeracy Mean (total 50) Male 23.54 Female 22.51 3. The performance of students on a geometry sub-test appeared very poor: 38 percent of students got 0 out of 9 marks and another 40 percent got only 1 mark out of 9. 4. Similarly, the performance of students on an algebra sub-test also appeared very poor: 31 percent of students got 0 out of 5 marks and about 36 percent got only 1 mark out of 5. 5. Girls outperformed boys in literacy Gender Literacy Mean (total 50) Male 25.81 Female 26.44 6. English teachers needed more help in teaching grammar. 7. Both English and mathematics teachers relied heavily on textbooks as a teaching resource. 23
8. Teachers in general have relatively little in-service education to update their own skills and refresh and enhance professional knowledge. 9. Urban students outperformed semi-urban, rural and remote students in all cases. 10. The shorter the distance a pupil travelled every day to school, the better the performance. 11. Very little professional support appeared to be provided to schools from the dzongkhags. 12. Major constraints to teachers’ professional duties included too many school activities, class size and lack of resources. B. Findings of World Bank’s Bhutan Learning Quality Survey (the Learning Quality Survey): 1. Except for Dzongkha, community schools record the lowest scores in English and Mathematics. 2. The overall rate of learning is low. • Average learning ability in Class IV is higher than expected learning competency in Class II by only half a standard deviation. • Alarmingly, this implies that at the current rate of learning, it will take the average student in Class II another year to reach the average competency for that grade. C. Outcomes of the Findings: • NEA findings show that achievement levels of learners in core subjects, particularly mathematics, at the end of primary education are disappointingly low (see Boxes 3 and 4). Such learning levels clearly indicate the poor quality of teaching/learning in classrooms. • Given current dropout rates from primary school, NEA tests show that even academically better-off children are performing poorly, particularly in mathematics. • Alarmingly, the overall “learning gain” is slow: one additional year per grade is required to reach the average competency for that grade. This implies that children are not mastering the curriculum within the prescribed time, resulting in high primary school grade repetition. Achievement levels tend to decline as children move along from PP to Class IV. Apparently, this decline is worst in Class IV, which consistently had the highest overall primary education repetition rate for 2001/2002-2006/2007, at 11.8 percent. Even among those children who get through Class IV, a significant number either repeat or drop out in Class V and /or Class VI. It can be surmised that a high proportion of children are completing the primary cycle without acquiring basic skills in reading, writing and numeracy. 24
• Most children substandard mastery in core subjects indicates a major gap in levels of understanding. If children do not acquire competencies at primary level, particularly • in English and maths, they will encounter serious learning challenges later. This also is demonstrated by results that Class VII had one of the highest secondary education repetition rates (10.9 percent) and dropout rates (7.15 percent) in the six-year period studied. • NEA, designed to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the education system as a whole, uses assessments that are curriculum-based and subject-oriented, generally covering Dzongkha, English and numeracy. So far, the assessment does not cover other aspects of learning, such as creativity and critical thinking (as assessed under some international testing systems). It is equally important, however, to incorporate an assessment of creativity and critical thinking in order to have a complete view of learning. • Especially worryingly, because urban students performed best in all cases under the NEA, this means that the education system has not been effective in contributing to greater equity in educational opportunities. Yet “educational attainment is one, if not the major, determinant of life chances and the opportunity to escape poverty.” (World Bank 2005 and National Human Development Report, UNDP 2005). Conclusion 1. Urgent and significant efforts need to be made to achieve UPE by 2015 2. Learners’ achievement in Bhutan is very low, and the most important challenge for primary education is to improve educational outcomes of children 25
You can also read