Divergent responses of two cereal aphids to previous infestation of their host plant

Page created by Martha Davis
 
CONTINUE READING
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 103: 43–50, 2002.
       © 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
                                                                                                                              43

Divergent responses of two cereal aphids to previous infestation of their
host plant

Frank J. Messina, Rodrick Taylor & Margaret E. Karren
Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5305, USA; (E-mail: messina@biology.usu.edu)

Accepted: April 23, 2002

Key words: induced responses, specificity, cereal aphids, feeding preferences, population growth, Diuraphis noxia,
Rhopalosiphum padi, Homoptera, Aphididae

Abstract
We examined the effects of prior infestation by the Russian wheat aphid [Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko)] and the
bird cherry-oat aphid [Rhopalosiphum padi (L.)] on the subsequent feeding preferences and performance of each
species. Aphid colonies fed and reproduced on wheat seedlings for five days and were then removed. After a period
of plant recovery, we estimated aphid population growth and feeding preferences on control and previously infested
plants. Previous infestation by D. noxia had no effect on the subsequent population growth of either aphid species.
Previous infestation by R. padi reduced its own subsequent growth by 50%, but had little effect on the population
growth of D. noxia. When presented leaves from control plants and D. noxia-infested plants, D. noxia adults
preferred to feed on leaves from control plants; R. padi adults showed no preference. Both aphids preferred leaves
from control plants to those from R. padi-infested plants. In free-flight cages, alates of R. padi settled more often
and produced more progeny on control plants than on plants previously infested by R. padi, but their rates of settling
and reproduction were unaffected by prior D. noxia infestation. Together, our results suggest specificity in both
the plant response to the two aphid species (plant quality for R. padi was lowered by prior R. padi infestation but
not by D. noxia infestation) and in each aphid’s response to the same modification of the host plant (infestation by
R. padi reduced plant quality for itself but not for D. noxia). Effects of prior infestation on the feeding preferences
of R. padi were correlated with effects on performance.

Introduction                                                            (Agrawal, 1999) or different stages of the same her-
                                                                        bivore (van Dam et al., 2001). In this study, we
Plants undergo a wide variety of chemical and mor-                      examined the specificity of plant and insect responses
phological changes in response to attack by herbivores                  to feeding by two cereal aphids.
and pathogens (Karban & Baldwin, 1997). Induced                             Phloem-feeding aphids illustrate the complexity of
responses may serve as a defense by deterring further                   induced responses in plants. The presence of one aphid
herbivory, but in some cases prior infestation improves                 can enhance the growth of another (e.g., Kidd et al.,
the performance of later-arriving herbivores (Gange &                   1985; Fisher, 1987), particularly if aphid feeding in-
Brown, 1989; Underwood, 1998; Agrawal & Sher-                           creases nutrient availability by altering the source-sink
riffs, 2001). Increasing evidence suggests that both                    relationships of leaves (Larson & Whitham, 1991).
induced responses and their consequences are highly                     On the other hand, feeding by one aphid may reduce
species-specific (Walling, 2000). One type of speci-                    phloem quality, and hence the performance of later- ar-
ficity, called specificity of elicitation, occurs when a                riving species (Petersen & Sandström, 2001). Because
plant shows distinct responses to different herbivore                   aphids often cause systemic changes in plant chem-
species (Stout et al., 1998). A second type, called                     istry, feeding by one species can decrease food quality
specificity of effect, arises when the same plant re-                   for another aphid on a different portion of the plant
sponse has contrasting effects on different herbivores                  (Moran & Whitham, 1990). Induced plant responses
44

can thus lead to asymmetrical competition between           produced one unfolded leaf and one emerging leaf.
aphid species (Inbar et al., 1999; Denno et al., 2000).     Cages had organdy-cloth windows on the sides and
    The Russian wheat aphid [Diuraphis noxia                top for ventilation. We used a camelhair brush to add
(Mordvilko)] and the bird cherry-oat aphid [Rhopalosi-      25 adult aphids (apterous D. noxia or alate R. padi)
phum padi (L.)] (Homoptera: Aphididae) commonly             to half of the caged plants. Aphids were obtained from
co-occur on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and other          anholocyclic laboratory colonies maintained on winter
cereals, but may have disparate effects on host plants.     wheat (Messina et al., 1993). The R. padi colony was
Russian wheat aphids feed in dense aggregations, usu-       derived from a virus-free population at Pennsylvania
ally in curled leaves, and cause extensive chlorosis        State University. Voucher specimens were placed in
(Riedell, 1989; Burd & Burton, 1992). Bird cherry-          the Utah State University Insect Collection.
oat aphids are less aggregated, do not produce such             Aphids fed and reproduced for five days, af-
visible damage, and tend to feed on the lower por-          ter which all plants were brought to the labora-
tions of plants (Pettersson et al. 1995; Quiroz et al.,     tory. Aphids on each infested plant were brushed
1997; Gianoli, 1999). Both species alter leaf protein       into a tray containing 50% ethanol. Small camelhair
content (Ni et al., 2001), but feeding by D. noxia          brushes were used to reach aphids (especially those
appears to cause a greater enhancement of nutrition         of D. noxia) feeding within curled leaves. Aphids
(Sandström et al., 2000; Sandström & Moran, 2001).          removed from a subset of infested plants were later
The two aphids may also differ in the tendency to in-       counted to provide an estimate of aphid density at the
duce putative plant defenses (Forslund et al., 2000;        end of the initial infestation. Because mechanical stim-
Ni et al., 2001). One study suggested that prior            ulation alone can induce changes in plant chemistry
feeding by D. noxia increased the fecundity of the          (e.g., Cipollini, 1997), uninfested plants were handled
greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) (Formusoh           in the same way as infested ones, i.e., their leaves were
et al., 1992), but infestation by R. padi seems to reduce   brushed over a tray containing 50% ethanol. All plants
plant quality (Gianoli, 2000; Alla et al., 2001).           were then transferred to a growth chamber at 24 ◦ C,
    Although D. noxia and R. padi appear to elicit dif-     50–60% r.h., and constant light. Plants remained in
ferent plant responses, most studies have considered        the chamber for two days, during which time we in-
only one of the two species or have been restricted to      spected them and removed the few aphids missed by
chemical assays of particular plant compounds. Even         the first brushing. Most plants produced a new leaf
if two herbivores induce different specific changes in      during this period. At the start of experiments, plants
plant chemistry, one cannot assume that they will have      usually possessed 2–3 unfolded leaves and one tiller.
different effects on overall plant quality (e.g., Under-
wood et al., 2002). We used as a set of experiments         Effects on population growth. Four initial experi-
to compare directly the effects of prior infestation by     ments compared aphid population growth on control
D. noxia and R. padi on the subsequent feeding pref-        plants and previously infested plants. Two experi-
erences and population growth of each species. The          ments separately measured the growth of each aphid
experiments were designed to examine both specificity       species on control and D. noxia-infested plants; two
of elicitation and specificity of effect.                   further experiments estimated each aphid’s growth on
                                                            control and R. padi-infested plants. Although it would
                                                            have been preferable to compare all treatments simul-
Materials and methods                                       taneously, the time required to remove primary in-
                                                            festations from a sufficient number of replicate plants
Establishment of control and infested plants. A stan-       precluded a full factorial design. In each experiment,
dard protocol was used to produce equal-aged control        control and previously-infested plants were returned
and previously infested plants for experiments. Seeds       to the greenhouse, inoculated with three adult aphids
of ‘Garland’ winter wheat were germinated in a peat-        (apterous D. noxia or alate R. padi) per plant, and
vermiculite mixture in 1450-ml, square pots in a            caged as before (N = 20–30 plants per treatment). Af-
greenhouse. Five days after planting, seedlings were        ter ten days, plants and aphids were harvested in
thinned to one per pot and fertilized with 50 ml of a 20-   jars containing 70% ethanol, and aphids were later
20-20 NPK solution. A cellulose-acetate cage (4.1 cm        counted under a dissecting microscope. The 10-day
diameter × 32 cm tall) was placed over each plant           duration of the experiment represented approximately
seven days after planting, by which time plants had         one and a half aphid generations, so that recovered
45

aphids included both the offspring and grandoffspring            A second pair of experiments measured the settling
of the original three females per plant. Because all         behavior and reproduction of alate R. padi on whole
plants bore at least three leaves and received only three    plants (alate D. noxia were not abundant enough to
aphids, any treatment effect on final aphid density will     use for this assay). Two control plants and two pre-
reflect variation in food quality rather than variation in   viously infested plants were placed into each of ten
food availability (Messina, 1993).                           cages (dimensions = 32 × 32 × 32 cm). The sides and
    Because we were primarily interested in the effects      top of the cages consisted of fine-mesh screening, and
of previous infestation on D. noxia populations, a fifth     the removable top allowed the introduction of potted
experiment was similar to the previous four but simul-       plants. We placed the two plants of the same type at
taneously compared the population growth of D. noxia         opposite corners of a cage and alternated which cor-
on control, D. noxia-infested, and R. padi-infested          ners received control or previously infested plants in
plants. A final (sixth) experiment examined the pop-         successive cages. Cages were arranged under a bank
ulation growth of D. noxia on plants previously in-          of fluorescent lights (L16:D8) on a laboratory bench.
fested with varying densities of D. noxia. We included       Ambient temperatures were 25–28 ◦ C and relative
this experiment because some studies suggested that          humidity was 35–40%.
infestation by D. noxia improved plant quality (For-             After plants were added to the cages, we placed
musoh et al., 1992; Sandström et al., 2000), but             a 10-cm petri dish containing 20 alate R. padi in the
it seemed likely that a positive effect would occur          center of each cage bottom, and removed the lid. Upon
only at intermediate aphid densities. Instead of adding      release, aphids often flew to the tops of the cage, but
25 aphids per plant to produce the primary infestation,      they usually settled on plants within 12 h. Aphids
we added 0, 5, 10, 25, or 50 aphids per plant (ten           were allowed to feed and reproduce for five days,
plants per treatment). Aphids from the primary infes-        after which plants and aphids were harvested into
tation were removed as before, and population growth         jars with 70% ethanol. The five-day interval between
was estimated ten days after each plant received two         aphid release and recovery was less than the time
adults. Greenhouse temperatures during each of the           needed to complete a generation, so that all recov-
population-growth experiments fluctuated between 20          ered adults were released individuals and all nymphs
and 30 ◦ C in a daily cycle; relative humidity was 50–       were their direct offspring. Paired t tests determined
80%. Analysis of variance was used to assess the effect      whether aphid counts differed between control and
of plant history on final population sizes. Counts were      previously infested plants. We pooled counts from the
square-root transformed before analysis.                     two plants of the same type per cage because these
                                                             counts were not statistically independent (i.e., the unit
Effects on feeding preferences. The effect of previ-         of replication was the cage rather than the individual
ous infestation on feeding preference was measured           plant).
in two experiments that used excised leaves. We used
scissors to cut a 6 cm-long section at the base of the
second unfolded leaf on each control or previously           Results
infested plant. This leaf was chosen because it usu-
ally bore many aphids during the primary infestation.        Effects on population growth. The first experiment
Only one leaf section was obtained from each plant.          measured the population growth of D. noxia on control
One control leaf and one previously infested leaf were       plants vs. plants previously infested by D. noxia. Mean
placed parallel to each other on moist filter paper in       aphid density (± SE) at the end of the primary infes-
each of 50, 10-cm petri dishes. In successive dishes         tation was 285.8 ± 14.4 (N = 10). Despite this level
we alternated the left-right orientation of control and      of prior infestation, population growth was not sig-
previously infested leaves. We then used a camelhair         nificantly different on control and previously infested
brush to place ten adults of either D. noxia or R. padi      plants (Figure 1A). In a second experiment, previous
(25 dishes per treatment) in the center of each dish         infestation by D. noxia had no effect on the popula-
(midway between the leaves). Dishes were transferred         tion growth of R. padi (Figure 1B), even though the
to a growth chamber at 24 ◦ C, and the number of             average density of the primary infestation had reached
aphids on each leaf was recorded after 4 h. Paired           359.3 ± 21.6 aphids per plant (N = 10).
t tests examined whether aphid distribution depended             Two further experiments used plants previously in-
on leaf type.                                                fested by R. padi. In the first experiment, the average
46

Figure 1. (A) Mean number (+ SE) of Russian wheat aphids (D. noxia) on control plants vs. plants previously infested by D. noxia (F = 0.92;
df = 1, 38; P = 0.34). (B) Mean number of bird cherry-oat aphids (R. padi) on control plants vs. plants previously infested by D. noxia
(F = 0.0001; df = 1, 48; P = 0.99). Counts were obtained ten days after each plant received three adults. N = 20–25 plants per treatment.

Figure 2. (A) Mean number (+ SE) of Russian wheat aphids (D. noxia) on control plants vs. plants previously infested by the bird cherry-oat
aphid (R. padi) (F = 2.55; df = 1, 48; P = 0.12). (B) Mean number of R. padi on control plants vs. plants previously infested by R. padi
(F = 73.01; df = 1, 59; P < 0.001). Counts were obtained ten days after each plant received three adults. N = 25–30 plants per treatment.

density of R. padi was 268.0±11.2 at the time of aphid                   ined D. noxia growth on control, D. noxia-infested,
removal (N = 14). The subsequent population growth                       and R. padi-infested plants. Average densities of the
of D. noxia was approximately 12% higher on control                      primary infestation were 286 ± 20.5 and 256.7 ± 23.1
plants than on plants previously infested by R. padi                     aphids per plant for D. noxia- and R. padi-infested
(Figure 2A), but this difference was not significant                     plants, respectively (N = 10 sampled plants per treat-
(P = 0.12). In a second experiment, prior infestation                    ment). Ten days after all plants received three adults,
by R. padi had a strong negative effect on its own pop-                  population sizes of D. noxia were virtually identical
ulation growth; aphid density on previously infested                     on control plants (209.7 ± 16.5) and those previ-
plants was nearly 50% lower than it was on control                       ously infested by D. noxia (205.5 ± 13.5). Populations
plants (Figure 2B). The density of the primary infes-                    were slightly smaller on plants previously infested by
tation in this experiment was 269.8 ± 19.3 aphids per                    R. padi (180.4 ± 10.9), but the effect of previous in-
plant (N = 12).                                                          festation on the population growth of D. noxia was
    The above experiments suggested that the popula-                     again non-significant (F = 1.19; df = 2, 70; P = 0.31;
tion growth of D. noxia was unaffected by previous                       N = 23–25 plants per treatment).
infestation. To confirm this, we simultaneously exam-
47
  Table 1. Mean number (± SE) of Russian wheat aphids
  (D. noxia) on plants previously infested by different densi-
                                                                   When alates of R. padi were presented control plants
  ties of D. noxia. Counts from the secondary infestation were     and plants previously infested by R. padi, they were
  obtained ten days after each plant received two adults           significantly more likely to settle on control plants
                                                                   (Table 3). The density of nymphs also reflected this
          Primary infestation
                                                                   preference for control plants (Table 3).
    Initial density   Final density    Secondary infestationa

     0                  0              68.9 ± 7.4
                                                                   Discussion
     5                 39.5 ± 7.2      69.8 ± 6.4
    10                108.0 ± 9.2      56.2 ± 6.0
                                                                   Effects of aphid infestation on wheat seedlings were
    25                287.5 ± 42.4     48.6 ± 5.6
                                                                   species-specific. Specificity of elicitation (Stout et al.,
    50                553.5 ± 41.8     55.4 ± 6.3
                                                                   1998) was suggested by the contrasting responses of
  a Analysis of variance; F = 2.11; df = 4, 44, P = 0.10, N = 9–
                                                                   R. padi to plants that had been infested with simi-
  10 replicate plants per treatment.
                                                                   lar densities of either D. noxia or R. padi. Popula-
                                                                   tion growth was reduced by previous R. padi infes-
    The final population-growth experiment examined                tation, and adults avoided both excised leaves and
whether the performance of D. noxia on previously in-              whole plants that had been fed upon by R. padi. In
fested plants depended on the density of the previous              contrast, the population growth of R. padi was un-
infestation. Adding 0, 5, 10, 25, or 50 Russian wheat              affected by D. noxia infestation, and adults readily
aphids per plant produced wide variation in aphid den-             colonized leaves and plants that had been fed upon
sity at the end of the primary infestation (Table 1).              by D. noxia. Among aphids, specificity of elicitation
Subsequent population growth tended to be higher on                could be mediated by differences in the composition of
plants that experienced the two lowest levels of pre-              saliva (Prado & Tjallingii, 1997; Felton & Eichenseer,
vious infestation, but the effect of previous infestation          1999), which may generate different profiles of plant
on the population growth was not significant (Table 1).            allelochemicals (Forslund et al., 2000; Ni et al., 2001).
The population growth of D. noxia was in fact sim-                     Specificity of effects can be detected by comparing
ilar on plants whose primary infestations differed by              the responses of two or more herbivores to the same
five-fold (compare the 10- vs. 50-aphid treatments in              change in the host plant (Tran et al., 1997). In our
Table 1).                                                          experiments, prior infestation by R. padi reduced its
                                                                   own subsequent growth, but did not have a significant
Effects on feeding preferences. Adults of D. noxia                 effect on the growth of D. noxia. It is unclear why
were about two times more likely to settle and feed                Russian wheat aphids were less sensitive to previous
on leaves from control plants than on leaves from                  R. padi infestation, but our results are consistent with
plants previously infested by D. noxia (Table 2). In               field and greenhouse experiments in which the two
contrast, adults of R. padi were distributed equally               aphid species were added to grasses simultaneously
on the two kinds of leaves. When presented control                 (Bergeson & Messina, 1997). In that study, the pres-
leaves vs. leaves previously infested by R. padi, adults           ence of R. padi lowered the rate of increase of D. noxia
of both aphid species strongly preferred control leaves            only when the former species reached extremely high
(Table 2).                                                         densities (a few thousand individuals per seedling).
    The settling and reproduction of R. padi alates                Perhaps the modification of leaf chemistry caused by
on whole plants mirrored their responses to excised                D. noxia feeding renders this aphid less susceptible to
leaves. In each experiment, about half of the 20 alates            induced defenses of cereals (Telang et al., 1999). In
per cage were recovered five days after they were                  particular, D. noxia appears to be less sensitive than
released. In the first experiment, alates showed no                R. padi to hydroxamic acids, which are known to be
avoidance of plants previously infested by D. noxia;               induced by R. padi infestation (Givovich & Niemeyer,
they were in fact slightly more common on previously               1995; Mayoral et al., 1996; Ni & Quisenberry, 2000).
infested plants (Table 3). As a consequence, nymphal                   Our experiments cannot exclude the possibility
densities were about 20% higher on plants previously               that D. noxia is negatively affected by local R. padi
infested by D. noxia than on control plants, but this              feeding, but does not respond to systemic effects. In
difference was only marginally significant (Table 3).              the preference test, D. noxia adults avoided leaves
                                                                   from R. padi-infested plants (Table 2), and some of
48
                        Table 2. Mean number (± SE) of aphids settling on control leaves vs. leaves pre-
                        viously infested by the Russian wheat aphid (D. noxia) or the bird cherry-oat aphid
                        (R. padi). Counts were obtained 4 h after the release of ten adults per dish

                                                                Number of aphids / leaf

                          Primary         Test species     Control leaves      Infested leaves        ta         P
                          infestation

                          D. noxia        D. noxia         4.7 ± 0.5           2.4 ± 0.4              2.75       0.01
                                          R. padi          5.1 ± 0.4           4.6 ± 0.4              0.61       0.55
                          R. padi         D. noxia         3.5 ± 0.3           1.8 ± 0.4              2.58       0.02
                                          R. padi          5.0 ± 0.5           2.6 ± 0.4              3.02       0.01

                        a Paired t test, N = 25 replicate dishes per test.

                       Table 3. Mean number (± SE) of bird cherry-oat aphids (R. padi) on control plants vs.
                       plants previously infested by the Russian wheat aphid (D. noxia) or R. padi. Counts
                       were obtained five days after the release of 20 alate adults per cage

                                                              Number of aphids / cage

                         Primary
                         infestation    Aphid stage      Control plants      Infested plants     ta          P

                         D. noxia       Adults            5.1 ± 1.0           6.4 ± 0.7          1.30         0.23
                                        Nymphs           71.2 ± 13.7         92.6 ± 6.3          1.86         0.10
                         R. padi        Adults            7.5 ± 0.9           3.4 ± 0.8          2.58         0.002
                                        Nymphs           99.7 ± 11.0         51.1 ± 7.5          5.70
49

induced responses has implications for the exogenous                     Felton, G. W. & H. Eichenseer, 1999. Herbivore saliva and its
application of plant elicitors (such as jasmonic acid)                      effects on plant defense against herbivores and pathogens. In:
                                                                            A. A. Agrawal, S. Tazun & E. Bent (eds), Induced Plant De-
to control insect pests. For example, exposing wheat                        fenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores. APS Press, St. Paul,
seedlings to methyl jasmonate was recently shown to                         Minnesota, pp. 19–36.
deter feeding by R. padi (Slesak et al., 2001); it would                 Fisher, M., 1987. The effect of previously infested spruce needles
not be surprising to find that the same exposure has                        on the growth of the green spruce aphid, Elatobium abietinum,
                                                                            and the effect of the aphid on the amino acid balance of the host
little effect on D. noxia. Since most crops are attacked                    plant. Annals of Applied Biology 111: 33–41.
by a broad spectrum of pests, more research should                       Formusoh, E. S., G. E. Wilde & J. C. Reese, 1992. Reproduction and
be aimed at the community-wide effects of induced                           feeding behavior of greenbug biotype E (Homoptera: Aphididae)
responses to herbivory (Stout et al., 1999; Thaler et al.,                  on wheat previously fed upon by aphids. Journal of Economic
                                                                            Entomology 85: 789–793.
2001, 2002).                                                             Forslund, K., J. Pettersson, T. Bryngelsson & L. Jonsson, 2000.
                                                                            Aphid infestation induces PR-proteins differently in barley sus-
                                                                            ceptible or resistant to the birdcherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum
Acknowledgements                                                            padi). Physiologia Plantarum 110: 496–502.
                                                                         Gange, A. C. & V. K. Brown, 1989. Effects of root herbivory by an
                                                                            insect on a foliar-feeding species, mediated through changes in
We thank Dr F. E. Gildow at Pennsylvania State                              the host plant. Oecologia 81: 38–42.
University for supplying the R. padi colony, and                         Gianoli, E., 1999. Within-plant distribution of Rhopalosiphum padi
A. B. Pederson for technical assistance. Research                           on wheat seedlings is affected by induced responses. Entomolo-
was supported by the Utah Agricultural Experiment                           gia Experimentalis et Applicata 93: 227–230.
                                                                         Gianoli, E., 2000. Competition in cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphi-
Station and approved as journal article 7419.                               didae) on wheat plants. Environmental Entomology 29: 213–
                                                                            219.
                                                                         Givovich, A. & H. M. Niemeyer, 1995. Comparison of the effect of
References                                                                  hydroxamic acids from wheat on five species of cereal aphids.
                                                                            Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 74: 115–119.
Agrawal, A. A., 1999. Induced responses to herbivory in wild             Hodgson, D. J. & H. C. J. Godfray, 1999. The consequences of clus-
   radish: effects on several herbivores and plant fitness. Ecology         tering by Aphis fabae foundresses on spring migrant production.
   80: 1713–1723.                                                           Oecologia 118: 446–452.
Agrawal, A. A. & M. F. Sherrifs, 2001. Induced plant resistance and      Inbar, M., H. Doostdar, G. L. Leibee & R. T. Mayer, 1999. The
   susceptibility to late-season herbivores of wild radish. Annals of       role of plant rapidly induced responses in asymmetric interspe-
   the Entomological Society of America 94: 71–75.                          cific interactions among insect herbivores. Journal of Chemical
Alla, S., J. P. Moreau & B. Frérot, 2001. Effects of the aphid              Ecology 25: 1961–1979.
   Rhopalosiphum padi on the leafhopper Psammotettix alienus             Karban, R. & I. T. Baldwin, 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory.
   under laboratory conditions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Ap-           University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   plicata 98: 203–209.                                                  Kidd, N. A. C., G. B. Lewis & C. A. Howell, 1985. An associa-
Bergeson, E. & F. J. Messina, 1997. Resource- vs. enemy-mediated            tion between two species of pine aphid, Schizolachnus pineti and
   interaction between cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on              Eulachnus agilis. Ecological Entomology 10: 427–432.
   a common host plant. Annals of the Entomological Society of           Larson, K. C. & T. G. Whitham, 1991. Manipulation of food re-
   America 90: 425–432.                                                     sources by a gall-forming aphid: the physiology of sink-source
Bergeson, E. & F. J. Messina, 1998. Effect of a co-occurring aphid          interactions. Oecologia 88: 15–21.
   on the susceptibility of the Russian wheat aphid to lacewing          Mayoral, A. M., W. F. Tjallingii & P. Castañera, 1996. Probing
   predators. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 87: 103–              behavior of Diuraphis noxia on five cereal species with dif-
   108.                                                                     ferent hydroxamic acid levels. Entomologia Experimentalis et
Burd, J. D., 2002. Physiological modification of the host feeding site      Applicata 78: 341–348.
   by cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of Economic          Messina, F. J., 1993. Effect of initial colony size on the per capita
   Entomology 95: 463–468.                                                  growth rate and alate production of the Russian wheat aphid
Burd, J. D. & R. L. Burton, 1992. Characterization of plant damage          (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological
   caused by Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal            Society 66: 365–371.
   of Economic Entomology 85: 2017–2022.                                 Messina, F. J., T. A. Jones & D. C. Nielson, 1993. Seasonal varia-
Cipollini, D. F., Jr., 1997. Wind-induced mechanical stimula-               tion in the performance of the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera:
   tion increases pest resistance in common bean. Oecologia 111:            Aphididae) on alternate hosts. Environmental Entomology 22:
   84–90.                                                                   1022–1030.
Dam, N. M. van, U. Hermanau & I. T. Baldwin, 2001. Instar-               Moran, N. A. & T. G. Whitham, 1990. Interspecific competition
   specific sensitivity of specialist Manduca sexta larvae to induced       between root-feeding and leaf-galling aphids mediated by host-
   defenses in their host plant Nicotiana attenuata. Ecological             plant resistance. Ecology 71: 1050–1058.
   Entomology 26: 578–586.                                               Moran, P. J. & G. A. Thompson, 2001. Molecular responses to aphid
Denno, R. F., M. A. Peterson, C. Gratton, J. Cheng, G. A. Lan-              feeding in Arabidopsis in relation to plant defense pathways.
   gellotto, A. F. Huberty & D. L. Finke, 2000. Feeding-induced             Plant Physiology 125: 1074–1085.
   changes in plant quality mediate interspecific competition be-        Ni, X. & S. S. Quisenberry, 2000. Comparison of DIMBOA
   tween sap-feeding herbivores. Ecology 81: 1814–1827.                     concentrations among wheat isolines and corresponding plant
50

   introduction lines. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 96:    Stout, M. J., K. V. Workman, R. M. Bostock & S. S. Duffey, 1998.
   275–279.                                                              Specificity of induced resistance in the tomato, Lycopersicon
Ni, X., S. S. Quisenberry, T. Heng-Moss, J. Markwell, G. Sarath, R.      esculentum. Oecologia 113: 74–81.
   Klucas & F. Baxendale, 2001. Oxidative responses of resistant      Stout, M. J., A. L. Fidantsef, S. S. Duffey & R. M. Bostock,
   and susceptible cereal leaves to symptomatic and nonsymp-             1999. Signal interactions in pathogen and insect attack: systemic
   tomatic cereal aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding. Journal of       plant-mediated interactions between tomato pathogens and her-
   Economic Entomology 94: 743–751.                                      bivores of the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Physiological
Petersen, M. K. & J. P. Sandström, 2001. Outcome of indirect com-        and Molecular Plant Pathology 54: 115–130.
   petition between two aphid species mediated by responses in        Telang, A., J. Sandström, E. Dyreson & N.A. Moran, 1999. Feeding
   their common host plant. Functional Ecology 15: 525–534.              damage by Diuraphis noxia results in a nutritionally enhanced
Pettersson, J., A. Quiroz, D. Stephansson & H. M. Niemeyer, 1995.        phloem diet. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 91: 403–
   Odour communication of Rhophalosiphum padi on grasses. En-            412.
   tomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 76: 325–328.                 Thaler, J. S., M. J. Stout, R. Karban & S. S. Duffey, 2001.
Prado, E. & W. F. Tjallingii, 1997. Effects of previous infesta-         Jasmonate-mediated induced plant resistance affects a commu-
   tion on sieve element acceptance by two aphids. Entomologia           nity of herbivores. Ecological Entomology 26: 312–324.
   Experimentalis et Applicata 82: 189–200.                           Thaler, J. S., R. Karban, D. E. Ullman, K. Boege & R. M. Bostock,
Quiroz, A., J. Pettersson, J. A. Pickett, L. J. Wadhams & H. M.          2002. Cross-talk between jasmonate and salycylate plant defense
   Niemeyer, 1997. Semiochemicals mediating spacing behavior of          pathways: effects on several plant parasites. Oecologia 131: 227–
   bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi feeding on cereals.         235.
   Journal of Chemical Ecology 23: 2599–2607.                         Tran, P., T. M. Cheesbrough & R. W. Kieckhefer, 1997. Plant
Riedell, W. E., 1989. Effects of Russian wheat aphid infestation on      proteinase inhibitors are potential anticereal aphid compounds.
   barley plant response to drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum        Journal of Economic Entomology 90: 1672–1677.
   77: 587–592.                                                       Underwood, N. C., 1998. The timing of induced resistance and in-
Sandström, J. P. & N. A. Moran, 2001. Amino acid budgets in              duced susceptibility in the soybean-Mexican bean beetle system.
   three aphid species using the same host plant. Physiological          Oecologia 114: 376–381.
   Entomology 26: 202–211.                                            Underwood, N. C., M. Rausher & W. Cook, 2002. Bioassay versus
Sandström, J., A. Telang & N. A. Moran, 2000. Nutritional en-            chemical assay: Measuring the impact of induced and con-
   hancement of host plants by aphids – a comparison of three aphid      stitutive resistance on herbivores in the field. Oecologia 131:
   species on grasses. Journal of Insect Physiology 46: 33–40.           211–219.
Slesak, E., M. Slesak & B. Gabrys, 2001. Effect of methyl jas-        Walling, L. L., 2000. The myriad plant responses to herbivores.
   monate on hydroxamic acid content, protease activity, and bird        Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 19: 195–216.
   cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) probing behavior.
   Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 2529–2543.
You can also read