Differential gene expression analysis of strawberry cultivars that differ in fruit-firmness

Page created by Jimmie Medina
 
CONTINUE READING
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM 118: 571–578. 2003                                                          Copyright # Physiologia Plantarum 2003
Printed in Denmark – all rights reserved                                                                     ISSN 0031-9317

Differential gene expression analysis of strawberry cultivars that differ
in fruit-firmness
Elma M. J. Salentijn*, Asaph Aharoni, Jan G. Schaart, Marjan J. Boone, Frans A. Krens

*Plant Research International, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
*Corresponding author, e-mail: E.M.J.Salentijn@plant.wag-ur.nl
Received 17 September 2002; revised 9 January 2003

Firmness is an important selection criterium in the breeding     expression, including 10 clones (8 different ones) which
of fruit, including strawberry (Fragaria · ananassa Duch.).      showed homology to cell wall related genes in the public
Clear differences in fruit-firmness are observed between         databases. The results from the microarray experiments
cultivars. In order to identify candidate genes which might      were further confirmed by RNA gel blots, which were also
be associated with such textural differences, gene expression    used to examine gene expression in a third cultivar, Elsanta,
levels were compared for a soft and a firm cultivar              showing an intermediate texture phenotype (offspring of a
(cv. Gorella and cv. Holiday, respectively). DNA-microarrays     cross between Gorella and Holiday). Interestingly, two genes
representing 1701 strawberry cDNAs were used for simultan-       encoding proteins catalysing successive reactions in lignin
eous hybridization of two RNA populations derived from           metabolism (cinnamoyl CoA reductase and cinnamyl alcohol
red ripe fruit of both cultivars. In total 61 clones (3.6% of    dehydrogenase) showed the highest difference in expression
the total cDNAs on the arrays) displayed differential            level.

Introduction
Strawberry (Fragaria  ananassa Duch.) is an important           (i.e. b-galactosidase [EC 3.2.1.23], pectin methylesterase
soft fruit in the temperate climate zones of the world.          (PME) [pectinesterase; EC 3.1.1.11], endo- and
This attractive and tasty fruit, with its high nutritional       exo-polygalacturonase [endo-PG, pectinase; EC 3.2.1.15,
value, is either sold in the fresh market or as a raw            exo-PG, galacturan; EC 3.2.1.67] (Barnes and Patchett
material for the food processing industry. Fruit-firmness        1976, Huber 1984, Nogata et al. 1993, Manning 1998b,
is an important issue for both markets and is therefore an       Llop-Tous et al. 1999, Redondo-Nevado et al. 2001,
important target for improvement of strawberry quality           Trainotti et al. 2001). Pectate lyase [EC 4.2.2.2] activity
(Manning 1998a). Cultivars can differ significantly in           is difficult to measure in strawberry. However, two
textural aspects like firmness, postharvest shelf life and       cDNAs coding for pectate lyase (U63550 and
susceptibility to damage. Texture of fruits, including           AF339024) are highly expressed in strawberry fruit
fruit-firmness, is determined by cell turgor pressure and        (Medina-Escobar et al. 1997) and recently, Jiménéz-
by characteristics of the cell wall. Modification and turn-      Bermudez et al. 2002) reported that transgenic plants
over of the primary cell wall is required for both growth        with reduced pectate lyase expression (to less than 30%
(cell expansion) and for the softening of fruits, whereby        of the control plants) showed a higher fruit-firmness.
one family of cell wall and middle lamella modifying                Another group of cell wall related enzymes such as
proteins mediate the activity of other families in a             endo-1,4-b-glucanases (cellulases), xyloglucan endo-
concerted and synergistic action (Rose and Bennett 1999).        transglycolase [EC 2.1.4.207] and expansins may play a
   In recent years, expression patterns of genes encoding        role in the disassembly of the hemicellulose matrix in
various different enzymes likely to be involved in the           ripening fruits (Abeles and Takeda 1990, Rose and
modification of the cell wall and thus in fruit-firmness         Bennett 1999). The expression profiles of several
have been extensively studied. They mainly include               cDNAs coding for endo-1,4-b-glucanases [EC 3.2.1.4]
enzymes acting on the pectin fraction of the cell wall           have been studied in strawberry (Harpster et al. 1998,

Physiol. Plant. 118, 2003                                                                                                          571
Llop Tous et al. 1999, Trainotti et al. 1999a, 1999b).        intermediately firm fruits, was selected from the offspring
Transgenic strawberry plants with a considerable              of the cross between cv. Holiday and cv. Gorella. Ripe fruits
decrease in cel1 mRNA accumulation, encoding an               of the cultivars Holiday and Gorella were used for
endo-1,4-b-glucanase enzyme, did not show a clear             poly(A)1 RNA isolation (mRNA purification kit, Amer-
change in firmness (Woolley et al. 2001). Furthermore,        sham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). These poly(A)
it is evident that expansins are intimately involved in the   RNAs were subsequently labelled for use as samples in
fruit-softening process. These proteins help to gain access   DNA microarray experiments.
to the cell wall to early hemicellulases and late acting
pectinases in tomato ripening (Brummell et al. 1999,
                                                              RNA-isolation and RNA gel blot analysis
Brummell and Harpster 2001). Expansin activity was
also detected in ripening strawberry fruits (Harrison         For RNA gel blot analysis, total RNA was isolated from
et al. 2001) and 7 expansins genes (FaExp1–7) were            fruit tissue according to Schulz et al. (1994). 6–10 mg of
isolated (Civello et al. 1999, Harrison et al. 2001).         glyoxal (1.5 M)-denatured total RNA (6–10 mg) was electro-
   DNA microarray technology provides a powerful way          phoresed and transferred to a Hybond N1-membrane
to investigate differential gene expression (reviewed by      (Amersham). Probes for hybridization were labelled
Aharoni and Vorst 2002). The method is fluorescence-          via random prime labelling (Random Prime Labelling
based and allows the simultaneous and quantitative            kit; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For quantifica-
analysis of gene expression for a large set of genes. In      tion, RNA gel blots were exposed to a phosphorimager-
the past years, microarrays representing hundreds of          screen, and subsequently scanned in a Bioimager device
cDNAs derived from a strawberry fruit cDNA library            (Fujix BAS2000). Next, the signals were measured as
have been utilized for monitoring gene expression during      photo-simulated-luminescence (OD per mm2) using TINA
fruit development and specifically in achene and recep-       software (Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany). cDNA
tacle tissue (Aharoni and O’Connell 2002). The same           sequences of cell wall related genes were used as probes
microarrays have been used for the identification of          for RNA gel blot analysis. Strawberry cDNA sequences
auxin dependent and independent genes and oxidative           coding for, respectively, a ribosomal protein and a DNA
stress responsive ripening-related genes (Aharoni et al.      binding protein were used as internal controls for loading.
2002). Apart from providing a global picture on gene          Expression level quantification was determined relative to a
expression during fruit maturation the method facilitated     loading control using the same RNA gel blot (after strip-
the identification of individual genes related to fruit       ping of the first probe) for both probes.
quality traits (Aharoni et al. 2000). To date, no studies
investigating the phenotypic differences in fruit-
                                                              DNA-microarray experiments
phenotype among strawberry cultivars have been
reported.                                                     DNA-microarray analysis, development of the fluores-
   In this report, we describe the use of DNA microarray      cent target probes and statistical analysis of reciprocal
technology to identify genes that may determine cultivar      two-colour microarray experiments were performed
differences in fruit-firmness by comparing the expression     according to Aharoni et al. (2000) using the same batch
profiles of two strawberry cultivars that differ substan-     of microarray slides containing 1701 strawberry cv.
tially for this trait. The expression of candidate genes      Elsanta cDNAs spotted in duplicate. Expression ratios
identified in the microarray experiment was further           above or below the inverse of the value 2.1 indicated a
analysed in detail using RNA gel blots (Northern blots).      significant up- or downregulation.
Remarkably, in a soft fruit like strawberry, our results
indicate that mRNAs coding for the enzymes cinnamyl
                                                              Firmness measurements
alcohol dehydrogenase, CAD [EC 1.1.1.195], and
cinnamoyl CoA reductase, CCR [EC 1.2.1.44], which are         Mechanical properties of at least 6 freshly harvested ripe
involved in the lignin biosynthesis pathway, show a clear     strawberries (cultivars Elsanta, Holiday and Gorella)
differential expression profile among the cultivars.          were analysed at two perpendicular sides through
                                                              compression and penetration tests by using a universal
                                                              testing machine (TA-XT2i Texture Analyser, Stable
Materials and methods                                         Micro System, Godalming, UK).
Plant material
Strawberry (Fragaria  ananassa, Duch.) cultivars             Results
Elsanta, Holiday and Gorella were used for expression
                                                              Comparing a soft and a firm cultivar using strawberry
profiling by microarray and RNA gel blot analysis. The
                                                              cDNA microarrays
firm cultivar, Holiday, was selected in 1965 (US) from a
cross between cv. Raritan and breeding line NY844             Among cultivars of strawberry, significant differences in
whereas the soft cultivar Gorella was selected in 1955 in     firmness were observed in the ripe stage of fruit development.
the Netherlands from a cross between cv. Juspa and            For instance, the difference in firmness in the ripe stage
breeding line US3763. Cultivar Elsanta, that has              between cv. Holiday (firm) and cv. Gorella (soft) is

572                                                                                                       Physiol. Plant. 118, 2003
obvious and easy to detect by manual inspection. Values       Holiday (clones B39 and G61 showing 3.3 and 2.3 higher
of 5.0 and 2.5 (on a scale 1–5) were scored for Holiday       expression in cv. Holiday, see Table 1). A gene coding for
and Gorella, respectively, (an average over the years         O-methyl transferase (FaOMT, Wein et al. 2002) was not
1991–1997). Mechanical inspection, scored a firmness          significantly differentially expressed. This enzyme
of 18.5 and 7.4 (gradient between two points on the           (FaOMT) acts in the lignin biosynthesis pathway by
curve force [50 g]/t [s]) for Holiday and Gorrela, respect-   conversion of caffeic acid into ferulic acid.
ively. Both cultivars are the parents of cultivar Elsanta,       Other differentially expressed genes putatively encod-
which showed an intermediate phenotype for firmness,          ing for proteins with a probable influence on the cell wall
when examined by similar criteria (manually: 4.0;             were an endo-1,4-b-glucanase, Cel1 (clone C1), acting on
mechanically: 14.7). Apart from the difference in texture,    the hemicellulose or cellulose fraction of the cell wall,
the cultivars Holiday and Gorella show obvious differ-        and several enzymes that may act on the pectin fraction,
ences in colour, flavour and the shine and fragility of the   like sequences with similarity to PME (clones B8 and
skin. Ripe fruits of cv. Holiday are bright red, have a       H163) and a PG-like gene (clone B4). Furthermore,
shining skin and a distinct flavour, whereas the fruits of    genes putatively encoding structural cell wall proteins,
cv. Gorella are more brownish red, with a more dull           like a glycine rich protein (clone H58) and a hybrid
skin which is very fragile and a moderate flavour             proline rich protein (HyPRP, clone D65) were differen-
(ir. E.J. Meulenbroek, strawberry breeder at Plant            tially expressed.
Research International, personal communication).
   To identify genes that might be associated with the
                                                              Detailed gene expression analysis using RNA gel blots
phenotypic differences in firmness, we utilized
DNA-microarrays representing 1701 cDNAs isolated              The expression level of cell wall related genes, was exam-
from a ripe fruit cDNA library of the cultivar Elsanta        ined in the cultivars Elsanta, Holiday and Gorella using
(Aharoni et al. 2000). The microarrays were hybridized        quantitative RNA gel blots (Fig. 1). These RNA gel blot
with a mixture of fluorescently labelled targets derived      experiments confirmed the data by DNA microarrays for
from the firm cultivar Holiday and the soft cultivar          seven out of the eight different genes that were differen-
Gorella. The raw microarray data were further statisti-       tial expressed between Holiday and Gorella. The expres-
cally analysed to determine the threshold for a significant   sion of the proline rich protein (H58) was below the
change in expression (ratio ¼ 2.1) and a list of differen-    detection level of the RNA gel blot analysis and is there-
tially expressed clones between the two samples was           fore not presented.
generated. A set of 61 clones out of the 1701 present on         In ripe fruits, several genes that may possibly play a
the array (3.6%) showed a significant change in expres-       role in cell wall degradation like PME-like genes (H163
sion between the cultivars (Table 1). Based on their          and B8) and a PG-like gene (B4) were upregulated in the
homology to genes with a known or putative function           soft cultivar. In addition, the cell wall loosening enzyme
present in the public databases, the genes were assigned      expansin (FaExp2, B155) and the polygalacturonase
to various functional classes. Ten genes (among them 8        gene (sPG, D15) showed only a slight increase in
different ones) could be associated with cell wall            transcript level in the soft cultivar as detected by RNA
metabolism (16.4% of the differentially expressed             gel blot (Fig. 1).
genes). Other differentially expressed genes could be            The expression levels of CCR and CAD were analysed
associated with pigmentation (3.3%); primary metabo-          in six stages of fruit development (from small green to
lism (4.9%); protein degradation (8.2%); amino acid           ripe red) of the three cultivars, Holiday (firm), Elsanta
metabolism (11.5%); stress (9.8%) and transport and           (intermediate) and Gorella (soft) (Fig. 2). CAD and CCR
signalling (4.9%), whereas 41% of the genes could not         gene expression was similarly low between the cultivars
be attributed to a specific function.                         Gorella and Holiday in the early stages of fruit develop-
                                                              ment (small green and green-white). At the big white
                                                              stage expression of both genes started to differ between
Differential gene expression associated with cell wall
                                                              the two cultivars, being much higher for CCR in cv.
metabolism
                                                              Gorella and higher for CAD in cv. Holiday in the
Interestingly, the most dramatic differences in mRNA          subsequent stages up to and including the red ripe stage.
levels were observed for a homologue of cinnamoyl
CoA reductase (CCR, homologous to accession no.
                                                              Discussion
CAC07424, AJ295838, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez)
encoding an enzyme active in lignin metabolism. The           The texture of fruit such as strawberry is by far one of
CCR clones H101 and JB116 showed a more than                  the most important traits in breeding programmes.
20-fold higher level of expression in the soft cultivar       Breeding for firm fruit in strawberry is difficult since it
Gorella compared to the firm cultivar Holiday. Another        occasionally seems that texture is negatively linked with
gene, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD, homolo-            good flavour (E.J. Meulenbroek, personal communica-
gous to accession no. AAK28509, AF320110), encoding           tion). The trait is complex and more information on the
the enzyme catalysing the subsequent step in the lignin       factors that are determining and controlling it are
pathway was expressed higher in the firm cultivar             needed. In the present study we identified candidate

Physiol. Plant. 118, 2003                                                                                            573
Table 1. Differentially expressed cDNAs (PRI clone number) among ripe fruits of a firm cultivar (cv. Holiday) and a soft cultivar (cv. Gorella)
as determined by DNA-microarray analysis. Each cDNA was annotated according to the definition and accession of the nucleotide sequence
of the first BlastX homologue from the NCBI database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Out of the 61 differetially expressed cDNAs 8 were not
annotated because no hit was found in the database. Positive and negative ratios correspond to cDNAs that are higher expressed in the soft or
firm cultivar, respectively. The number in parentheses indicates the number of the sequence contig in the case when sequences are different but
show similar Blast results

                                   Homologue Definition                                                       Ratio
PRI clone                          (GeneBank accession number)                                                H/G
                                   PIGMENTATION
A5                                 UDP-GFT, AB047097                                                          12.2
D40                                Leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase, X71360                                     2.5
                                   PRIMARY METABOLISM
H51                                Pyruvate decarboxylase, AF193791 (1)                                       12.9
H68                                Pyruvate decarboxylase, AF193791 (1)                                       12.4
JB190                              Hydroxypyruvate reductase, AB060810                                        12.6
                                   PROTEIN DEGRADATION
C70                                Cysteine proteinase, AF454958 (1)                                          12.4
E71                                Cysteine proteinase, AF454958 (2)                                          12.6
E93                                Cysteine proteinase, AB020961 (3)                                          12.1
H55                                Cysteine proteinase, AF411121 (4)                                          12.1
H86                                Cysteine proteinase, NM_128302 (5)                                         2.8
                                   AMINO ACID METABOLISM
C151                               Glutamine synthetase, K03282                                               12.2
H154                               Asparagine synthetase, AF061740 (1)                                        13.5
H35                                Asparagine synthetase, AB035248 (2)                                        13.1
JB138                              Asparaginase, AF308474 (1)                                                 5.9
JB180                              Asparaginase, AY096000 (2)                                                 4.7
C119                               Glutamate decarboxylase, AF361836 (1)                                      12.3
C184                               Glutamate decarboxylase, AF506366 (2)                                      12.3
                                   STRESS
A104                               Glutathione S-transferase, NM_111189 (1)                                   12.3
C88                                Glutathione S-transferase, Y07721 (2)                                      12.1
Jb319                              Glutathione S-transferase, AF193439 (3)                                    2.8
E149                               Quinone reductase-like protein, NM_115504                                  12.6
A125                               Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, NM_105097                                    12.3
C137                               Superoxide dismutase, AF016893                                             12.2
                                   TRANSPORT/SIGNALLING
C86                                Ns-lipid transfer protein, AJ315844                                        2.2
JB299                              Serine threonine protein kinase, NM_118334                                 12.4
D156                               ADP-ribosylation factor, AP003247.4                                        17.8
                                   CELL WALL
B4                                 Endo-PG like protein, NM_116014.1                                          13.2
C1                                 Endo-b-1,4-glucanase, cel1, AF074923                                       2.4
B8                                 Similarity to pectinesterase, AB019235                                     12.5
H163                               Similarity to pectinesterase, AJ237985 (2)                                 12.3
H101                               Cinnamoyl CoA reductase, AJ295838 (1)                                      120.3
JB116                              Cinnamoyl CoA reductase, AJ295838 (1)                                      120.4
B39                                Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, AF320110 (1)                               3.3
G61                                Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, AF320110 (2)                               2.3
D65                                Hybrid PRP, AF026382                                                       2.6
H58                                Glycin rich protein, AB031227                                              2.8
                                   OTHERS
B181                               Ripening induced protein, AJ001449 (1)                                     16.9
E177                               Ripening induced protein, AJ001449 (1)                                     17.7
H174                               Ripening induced protein, AJ001445 (2)                                     2.5
H79                                Gast-like gene, AF039183                                                   2.8
Jb105                              Gibberellin 2 beta-hydroxylase, AF101382                                   2.3
D105                               cold-regulated gene, AF007784                                              4.9
E187                               Cytochrome P450, NM_123002                                                 2.9
F143                               3-hydroxyisobutyryl CoA hydrolase, NM_125991                               3.0
C3                                 Histone H2A, M64838                                                        2.4
E103                               Putative AAA-type ATPase, AK118992                                         2.3
C188                               FolC-FolP fusion protein, AF227236                                         2.2
D55                                Hypothetical protein, NM_116300                                            12.2
JB286                              Hypothetical protein, NC_003366                                            2.2
D81                                Hypothetical protein, NM_100756                                            2.8
G89                                Unknown protein, NM_121261                                                 2.5
F8                                 Expressed protein, AY091184                                                12.2
C91                                Expressed protein, NM_111682                                               12.4

574                                                                                                                         Physiol. Plant. 118, 2003
OD/mm2                                           the increment in transcript level was underestimated by
                                                             RNA gel blot
                                                                                                              DNA microarray analysis compared to the RNA gel blot

            Holiday

                                                                  Holiday
                      Gorella
  Elsanta

                                                                            Gorella
                                                   Elsanta
                                                                                      Ratio
                                                                                       RNA
                                                                                                  Ratio
                                                                                                   DNA
                                                                                                              analysis (Fig. 1).
                                 PRI clone                                            gel blot   microarray      Genes expected to be involved in cell wall degradation
                                D15 (sPG)         17.7           15.0       32.1       +2.1        +1.3*      such as the genes encoding PME-like and PG-like
                                                                                                              proteins were upregulated in the soft cultivar. For two
                                B155 (FaExp2)     48.8           85.6       103.7      +1.2        +1.0*      other important cell wall degrading enzymes, expansin
                                                                                                              (FaExp2) and polygalacturonase (sPG), only a slightly
                                H163 (PME-like)   11.0           2.4        11.1       +4.7        +2.3       higher expression was detected in ripe fruits of the soft
                                                                                                              cultivar by RNA gel blot analysis (Fig. 1). Both genes
                                B8 (PME-like)     153.8          29.0       141.9      +4.9        +2.5
                                                                                                              showed a more clear differential expression in the turn-
                                B4 (PG-like)      0.3            4.5        13.4       +3.0        +3.2       ing stages of fruit-ripening as detected by RNA gel blot
                                                                                                              analysis (results not shown), supporting their importance
                                H101 (CCR)        10.8           1.2        33.7       +27.9       +20.1      in determining differences in fruit-firmness. Further-
                                                                                                              more, a cDNA coding for endo-1,4-b-glucanases (Cel1),
                                B39 (CAD)         44.7           24.1       3.3        –7.4        –3.3       acting on the hemicellulose or hemicellulose fraction of
                                                                                                              the cell wall was differentially expressed (with a higher
                                D65 (HyPRP)       11.6           19.6       11.7       –1.7        –2.6
                                                                                                              expression observed in red fruits of the firm cultivar).
                                C1 (Cel1)         37.9           172.0      110.2      –1.6        –2.4       This may explain why downregulation of Cel1 mRNA
                                                                                                              accumulation by antisense inhibition did not result in
                                DBP                                                                           increased fruit firmness (Woolley et al. 2001).
                                                                                                                 Until recently, polygalacturonase (PG) activity in
                                EtBr                                                                          strawberry was an issue of debate (Manning 1993). How-
                                                                                                              ever, we previously reported on at least two PG encoding
Fig. 1. Confirmation of microarray results using RNA gel blot                                                 genes (clones B4 and D15) which are active during fruit
analysis. Probes of candidate genes for fruit texture were used to                                            development (Aharoni and O’Connell 2002). One of
hybridize gel-blots loaded with total RNA derived from the three                                              those genes (D15) was identical to the sPG gene
cultivars, Elsanta (intermediate), Holiday (firm) and Gorella
(soft). The expression levels on the RNA gel-blots were quantified                                            described by Redondo Nevado et al. 2001). The deduced
using a bioimager device (OD/mm2,TINA software, Raytest,                                                      sPG protein was classified as a Clade A polygalacturo-
Straubenhardt, Germany) and counted relative to the expression                                                nase, showing up to 45% sequence identity with
levels of an internal standard (gene coding for a DNA binding                                                 fruit-ripening endo-polygalacturonases. However, we
protein, DBP) that was expressed at a similar level in red fruits of
the three cultivars analysed. EtBr ¼ ethidium bromide stained RNA                                             observed a higher homology (up to 62% identity)
samples. The ratio of the expression levels between cv. Holiday and                                           with PGs belonging to Clade C (e.g. Salix gilgiana,
cv. Gorella were counted for, respectively, RNA gel blot and DNA-                                             BAA89478). This Clade comprises genes expressed in
micoarray. Positive ratios (1) and negative (–) ratios are reflecting,
respectively, an upregulation and a downregulation of specific gene                                           pollen that are thought to encode exo-PGs (Hadfield
expression in cv. Gorella. Ratios marked with an asterisk indicate a                                          and Bennett 1998). Also, a cystein residue that was
not significant difference in expression as measured by DNA                                                   shown to be restricted to pollen specific PGs (Tebbutt
microarray (ration below 1 or 2.1).
                                                                                                              et al. 1994) is present at position 273 of the deduced
                                                                                                              protein. The second gene with homology to polygalac-
                                                                                                              turonases (B4) was also expressed at the early stages of
genes that might be related to differences in texture                                                         development (Aharoni and O’Connell 2002). In the
among strawberry varieties.                                                                                   current study it was identified as differentially expressed
   For the analysis of differential gene expression DNA                                                       between the cultivars at the ripe stage (Fig. 1). The
microarray technology was used which previously has                                                           deduced amino acid sequence of the B4 cDNA is hom-
shown to serve as a powerful tool for the identification                                                      ologous to Arabidopsis thaliana putative PG sequences
of genes associated with major quality traits in straw-                                                       (e.g. NP-190464) and to microbial PGs (e.g. NP-346995).
berry (Aharoni et al. 2000). The cultivars Holiday and                                                        The pattern of the PG active-site (pattern PS00502 of the
Gorella, used for the comparisons in the DNA micro-                                                           prosite database at http://www.expasy.org/prosite) is
array experiments, are not closely related. Therefore, the                                                    present in the sPG protein. However, in the deduced B4
risk existed that the amount of differences was too high                                                      protein and homologous PG-like proteins the PG active-
and could mask the specific differences in gene expres-                                                       site differs from the one present in known PG proteins.
sion related to the trait of interest. However, this was not                                                  Also, the deduced amino acid sequences of the PME-like
the case and only 61 genes showed significant differences                                                     sequences (H163, B8) did not contain the consensus
in expression. Expression differences for specific                                                            regions that are present in all PMEs that have been
members of gene families are most likely underestimated                                                       functionally characterized (Markovic and Jornvall
by cross-hybridization in microarrays and have to be                                                          1992) and their functional role is still unclear.
validated by a secondary procedure, especially those                                                             The most pronounced difference between both
with a 2- to 4-fold difference in expression (Rajeevan                                                        cultivars was observed for the CCR and CAD genes.
et al. 2001). We found that in most cases (7 out of 9)                                                        These genes encode enzymes that are acting successively

Physiol. Plant. 118, 2003                                                                                                                                            575
A
                                             CCR                                                             CAD
                      16                                                           16
                           H                                                              H
                      14                                                           14
                           E                                                              E
   Transcript ratio

                      12   G                                                       12     G
                      10                                                           10
                      8                                                             8
                      6                                                             6
                      4                                                             4
                      2                                                             2
                      0                                                             0
                           SG     GW         BW         T        O       R               SG     GW          BW     T         O          R

   B                                                                                          monolignols
                                                  CCR                              CAD
                              feruloyl CoA                     coniferaldehyde               coniferalcohol            guaiacyl lignin
                              sinapoyl CoA                      sinapaldehyde                sinapylalcohol            syringyl lignin
                            p-coumaroyl CoA                 p-coumaroyl aldehyde           p-coumarylalcohol           p-hydroxyphenyl lignin

                                Flavonoids

Fig. 2. (A) Expression levels of CCR and CAD in fruit developmental stages [small green (SG), green white (GW), white (W), turning (T),
orange (O) and ripe (R)] of three different cultivars: Elsanta (E, intermediate firm), Holiday (H, firm) and Gorella (G, soft), as detected by
RNA gel blots. Each of the blots was checked for RNA amounts by rehybridizing with a strawberry ribosomal RNA probe. Quantification of
the results was performed by measuring the OD/mm2 (TINA software, Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany) for each band and calculating the
transcript ratio between the gene specific signal and the corresponding band in the ribosomal loading control (transcript ratio). (B) Substrates
and products of CCR and CAD, enzymes that are acting in a branch of the phenylpropanoid pathway leading to lignin biosynthesis (for a
detailed model of the lignin biosynthesis see Humphreys and Chapple 2002).

in the lignin biosynthetic pathway, which is a branch of                           cultivar and CAD in the firm cultivar. It is not comple-
the phenylpropanoid pathway (CCR acting upstream of                                tely clear yet how the lignin biosynthetic pathway oper-
CAD). Lignin in a soft fruit like strawberry has been                              ates. Modifications of lignin by downregulation or
detected in the achenes and in the vascular bundles that                           overexpression of CCR and CAD showed that severe
connect the achenes to the central pith (Suutarinen et al.                         changes in CAD activity had a striking effect on the
1998). Jewell et al. (1973) associated the amount of                               composition of lignin. In contrast, CCR downregulation
vascular tissue with texture and processing quality of                             effected mainly a decrease of the total lignin content
strawberries. Using a primary anti-strawberry CAD                                  (Chapple and Carpita 1998, Hertzberg et al. 2001,
polyclonal antiserum Aharoni et al. (2002) showed that                             Abbott et al. 2002, Humphreys and Chapple 2002). In
the corresponding protein was localized specifically to                            both natural occurring mutants and transgenic plants
immature xylem cells undergoing active lignification.                              with depleted levels of CAD, increased incorporation of
Also, expression of strawberry CAD in yeast cells and                              cinnamaldehydes into lignin has been observed. The
enzymatic activity assays demonstrated a cinnamyl                                  cross-linking and physical properties of cinnamaldehyde
alcohol dehydrogenase activity of the recombinant                                  rich lignins differ from that of normal lignins.
enzyme (Blanco-Portales et al. 2002) indicating that it                               It has been observed that the lignin in CAD deficient
may be involved in lignin biosynthesis. However, it can                            plants is more susceptible to chemical extraction and
not be ruled out that both enzymes CCR and CAD                                     shows improved pulping characteristics (Halpin et al.
acting in the lignin biosynthesis pathway are associated                           1994, Russell et al. 2000, Ruel et al. 2001). Thus, the
with other functions like, for CAD, the biosynthesis of                            differences in CAD gene expression could be related with
flavour compounds (Mitchell and Jelenkovic 1995).                                  lignin composition, being richer in aldehydes and more
Also, the various branches of the phenylpropanoid                                  susceptible to enzymatic degradation in the soft cultivar.
pathway including those associated with the biosynthesis                           However, since the lignin content and composition of
of lignin, hydroxycinnamates (ferulic, sinapic, caffeic and                        both strawberry cultivars has not been determined we
4-coumaric acid) and flavonoids, appear to be closely                              can not confirm this assumption.
linked. Variations in the flux through the pathway may                                In this study, DNA-microarray analysis provided a
lead to the biosynthesis of a different pool of hydroxy-                           method for large-scale identification of differentially
cinnamic acids or –aldehydes with a putative effect on                             expressed genes in a comparison between a soft and a
flavour or on cell wall bound hydroxycinnamates                                    firm cultivar. The combination of sequence information,
(Kroon and Williamson 1999).                                                       information on the biological function of sequence
   Expression of the CCR and CAD genes differed                                    homologues and additional gene expression data is
between the cultivars, CCR being higher in the soft                                needed to select candidate genes for further analysis.

576                                                                                                                              Physiol. Plant. 118, 2003
The information obtained, although correlative in                      Harrison EP, McQueen Mason SJ, Manning K (2001) Expression
nature, indicates that enzymes acting in the lignin                       of six expansin genes in relation to extension activity in devel-
                                                                          oping strawberry fruit. J Exp Bot 52: 1437–1446
biosynthesis pathway, CCR and CAD, are possible new                    Hertzberg M, Aspeborg H, Schrader J, Andersson A, Erlandsson
candidates for fruit-firmness. However, the hypotheses                    R, Blomqvist K, Bhalerao R, Uhlen M, Teeri TT, Lundeberg J,
concerning gene functions still must be confirmed                         Sundberg B, Nilsson P, Sandberg G (2001) A transcriptional
                                                                          roadmap to wood formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:
empirically. Therefore, the detailed functional analysis                  14732–14737
in strawberry using overexpression and inhibition of                   Huber DJ (1984) Strawberry fruit softening: the potential roles of
CCR is underway.                                                          polyuronides and hemicelluloses. J Food Sci 49: 1310–1315
                                                                       Humphreys JM, Chapple C (2002) Rewriting the lignin roadmap.
  Accession numbers of relevant clones: AY280662 (B4),                    Curr Opin Plant Biol 5: 224–229
AY282613 (D15), CB934831 (B39), CB934832 (B8),                         Jewell GG, Rantsios A, Scholey J (1973) Factors influencing
CB934833 (H163), CB934834 (H58), CB934835 (D65),                          the breakdown of fruit in strawberry jam. J Texture Stud 4:
AY285922 (H101).                                                          363–370
                                                                       Jiménéz-Bermudez S, Redondo Nevado J, Munoz Blanco J,
                                                                          Caballero JL, Lopez Aranda JM, Valpuesta V, Pliego Alfaro F,
Acknowledgements – We thank Ir GFJ Rasing from the ATO                    Quesada MA, Mercado JA (2002) Manipulation of strawberry
Agrotechnological Research Institute for supporting the firmness          fruit softening by antisense expression of a pectate lyase gene.
measurements.                                                             Plant Physiol 128: 751–775
                                                                       Kroon PA, Williamson G (1999) Hydroxycinnamates in plants
                                                                          and food: Current and future perspectives. J Sci Food Agric
References                                                                79: 355–361
                                                                       Llop-Tous I, Dominguez Puigjaner E, Palomer X, Vendrell M
Abbott JC, Barakate A, Pincon G, Legrand M, Lapierre C,                   (1999) Characterization of two divergent endo-beta-1,
   Mila I, Schuch W, Halpin C (2002) Simultaneous suppression             4-glucanase cDNA clones highly expressed in the nonclimacteric
   of multiple genes by single transgenes. Downregulation of three        strawberry fruit. Plant Physiol 119: 1415–1421
   unrelated lignin biosynthetic genes in tobacco. Plant Physiol       Manning K (1993) Soft fruits. In: Seymour GB, Taylor JE,
   128: 844–853                                                           Tucker GA (eds) Biochemistry of Fruit Ripening. Chapman &
Abeles FB, Takeda F (1990) Cellulase activity and ethylene in             Hall, London, pp 347–378, ISBN 0 412 40830 9
   ripening strawberry and apple fruits. Sci Hortic 42: 269–275        Manning K (1998a) Genes for fruit quality in strawberry. In:
Aharoni A, Keizer LCP, Bouwmeester HJ, Sun Z, Alvarez Huerta M,           Cockshull KE, Gray D, Seymour GB, Thomas B (eds) Genetic
   Verhoeven HA, Blaas J, Houwelingen AV, Vos RCHD, Voet H,               and Environmental Manipulation of Horticultural Crops. CAB
   vd Jansen RC, Guis M, Mol J, Davis RW, Schena M, Tunen AJV,            International, Wallingford, UK, pp 51–61, ISBN 0-85199-281-1
   O’Connell AP (2000) Identification of the SAAT gene involved in     Manning K (1998b) Isolation of a set of ripening-related genes from
   strawberry flavor biogenesis by use of DNA microarrays. Plant          strawberry: their identification and possible relationship to fruit
   Cell 12: 647–661                                                       quality traits. Planta 205: 622–631
Aharoni A, Keizer LCP, Van den Broeck HC, Blanco Portales R,           Markovic O, Jornvall H (1992) Disulfide bridges in tomato
   Munoz Blanco J, Bois G, Smit P, De Vos RCH, O’Connell AP               pectinesterase: variations from pectinesterases of other species;
   (2002) Novel insight into vascular, stress, and auxin-dependent        conservation of possible active site segments. Protein Sci 1:
   and -independent gene expression programs in strawberry, a             1288–1292
   non-climacteric fruit. Plant Physiol 129: 1019–1031                 Medina-Escobar N, Cardenas J, Moyano E, Caballero JL, Munoz
Aharoni A, O’Connell AP (2002) Gene expression analysis of straw-         Blanco J (1997) Cloning, molecular characterization and expres-
   berry achene and receptacle maturation using DNA micro-                sion pattern of a strawberry ripening-specific cDNA with
   arrays. J Exp Bot 53: 2073–2087                                        sequence homology to pectate lyase from higher plants. Plant
Aharoni A, Vorst O (2002) DNA microarrays for functional plant            Mol Biol 34: 867–877
   genomics. Plant Mol Biol 48: 99–118                                 Mitchell WC, Jelenkovic G (1995) Characterizing NAD- and
Barnes MF, Patchett BJ (1976) Cell wall degrading enzymes and the         NADP-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes of strawber-
   softening of senescent strawberry fruit. J Food Sci 41:                ries. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 120: 798–801
   1392–1395                                                           Nogata Y, Ohta H, Voragen AGJ (1993) Polygalacturonase in
Blanco-Portales R, Medina-Escobar N, López-Ráez JA, González-          strawberry fruit. Phytochemistry 34: 617–620
   Reyes JA, Villalba JM, Moyano E, Caballero JL, Muños-Blanco J      Rajeevan MS, Vernon SD, Taysavang N, Unger ER (2001) Valida-
   (2002) Cloning, expression and immunolocalization pattern              tion of array-based gene expression profiles by real-time
   of a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene from strawberry               (kinetic) RT-PCR. J Mol Diag 3: 26–31
   (Fragaria  ananassa cv. Chandler). J Exp Bot 53: 1723–1734         Redondo-Nevado J, Moyano E, Medina Escobar N, Caballero JL,
Brummell DA, Harpster MH (2001) Cell wall metabolism in fruit             Munoz Blanco J (2001) A fruit-specific and developmentally
   softening and quality and its manipulation in transgenic plants.       regulated endopolygalacturonase gene from strawberry
   Plant Mol Biol 47: 311–340                                             (Fragaria  ananassa cv. Chandler). J Exp Bot 52: 1941–1945
Brummell DA, Harpster MH, Civello PM, Palys JM, Bennett AB,            Rose JKC, Bennett AB (1999) Cooperative disassembly of the
   Dunsmuir P (1999) Modification of expansin protein abundance           cellulose-xyloglucan network of plant cell walls: parallels
   in tomato fruit alters softening and cell wall polymer metabo-         between cell expansion and fruit ripening. Trends Plant Sci 4:
   lism during ripening. Plant Cell 11: 2203–2216                         176–183
Chapple C, Carpita N (1998) Plant cell walls as targets for biotech-   Ruel K, Chabannes M, Boudet AM, Legrand M, Joseleau J-P
   nology. Curr Opin Plant Biol 1: 179–185                                (2001) Reassessment of qualitative changes in lignification of
Civello PM, Powell ALT, Sabehat A, Bennett AB (1999) An expan-            transgenic tobacco plants and their impact on cell wall assembly.
   sin gene expressed in ripening strawberry fruit. Plant Physiol         Phytochemistry 57: 875–882
   121: 1273–1279                                                      Russell WR, Provan GJ, Burkitt MJ, Chesson A (2000) Extent of
Hadfield KA, Bennett AB (1998) Polygalacturonases: many genes             incorporation of hydroxycinnamaldehydes into lignin in cinna-
   in search of a function. Plant Physiol 117: 337–343                    myl alcohol dehydrogenase-downregulated plants. J Biotechnol
Halpin C, Knight ME, Foxon GA, Campbell MM, Boudet AM,                    79: 73–85
   Boon JJ, Chabbert B, Tollier M-T, Schuch W (1994) Manipula-         Schultz DJ, Craig R, Cox Foster DL, Mumma RO, Medford JI,
   tion of lignin quality by downregulation of cinnamyl alcohol           Markovic O, Jornvall H (1994) RNA isolation from recalcitrant
   dehydrogenase. Plant J 6: 339–350                                      plant tissue. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12: 310–316
Harpster MH, Brummell DA, Dunsmuir P (1998) Expression                 Suutarinen J, Anakainen L, Autio K (1998) Comparison of light
   analysis of a ripening-specific, auxin-repressed endo-1,4-beta-        microscopy and spatially resolved Fourier transform infrared
   glucanase gene in strawberry. Plant Physiol 118: 1307–1316             (FT-IR) microscopy in the examination of cell wall components

Physiol. Plant. 118, 2003                                                                                                               577
of strawberries. Food Sci Technol Lebensmittel Wissenschaft          Trainotti L, Spolaore S, Pavanello A, Baldan B, Casadoro G
   Technologie 31: 595–601                                                 (1999a) A novel E-type endo-beta-1,4-glucanase with a putative
Tebbutt SJ, Rogers HJ, Lonsdale DM (1994) Characterisation of a            cellulose-binding domain is highly expressed in ripening straw-
   tobacco gene encoding a pollen-specific polygalacturonase.              berry fruits. Plant Mol Biol 40: 323–332
   Plant Mol Biol 25: 283–297                                           Wein M, Lavid N, Lunkenbein S, Lewinsohn E, Schwab W,
Trainotti L, Ferrarese L, Dalla-Vecchia F, Rascio N, Casadoro G            Kaldenhoff R (2002) Isolation, cloning and expression of a
   (1999b) Two different endo-beta-1,4-glucanases contribute to            multifunctional O-methyltransferase capable of forming
   the softening of strawberry fruits. Plant Physiol 154: 355–362          2,5-dimethyl-4-methoxy-3(2H)-furanone, one of the key aroma
Trainotti L, Spinello R, Piovan A, Spolaore S, Casadoro G,                 compounds in strawberry. Plant J 31: 755–765
   Schultz DJ, Craig R, Cox Foster DL, Mumma RO, Medford JI             Woolley L, James D, Kenneth M (2001) Purification and pro-
   (2001) Beta-galactosidases with a lectin-like domain are expressed      perties of an endo-beta-1,4-glucanase from strawberry and down-
   in strawberry. J Exp Bot 52: 1635–1645                                  regulation of the corresponding gene, cel1. Planta 214: 11–21

Edited by D. Van Der Straeten

578                                                                                                                    Physiol. Plant. 118, 2003
You can also read