DIDAT: GOALS, PROCEDURE, ORGANIZATION AND METHODICAL PROCEDURE - IASS POTSDAM
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Responsible use of digital data: Digital
Data as Subject of a Transdisciplinary
Project (DiDaT)
DiDaT: Goals, Procedure, Organization and
methodical procedure
(Short brochure, March 2020)
DiDaT aims to increase the adaptive capacity of The first version of the White Book will be
sensitive stakeholder groups and subsystems in presented at the 3rd DiDaT Stakeholder
Germany with respect to unintended side Conference at the end of June 2020. This will
effects of digital data. be followed by an intensive discursive
consultation (Vernehmlassung) of the seven
To this end, seven exemplary impact areas main chapters on impact areas (also known as
were selected (see the middle part of Fig. 3, vulnerability spaces).
page 4, classification of vulnerability spaces), in
which Unseens leading to vulnerabilities of In order to support the appropriateness and
sensitive stakeholder groups or subsystems in potential usefulness of the orientations
Germany are to be considered. The aim is to contained in the White Book, a number of
achieve a positive, more responsible and transdisciplinary laboratories (Td-Labs) will be
ultimately sustainable use of digital data and initiated in addition to the consultation
technologies. process.
DiDaT supports the development of social and The object of the work of the Td Labs is to
technological innovations for the responsible examine statements, boundary conditions,
handling and resilient use of digital data in all barriers and trade-offs that are linked with
areas of life. DiDaT works transdisciplinarily. practice or with socio-technological innovations
This means that the work process at all levels is in real-world contexts and thus to prepare an
managed and shaped equally by interface in which theoretical and practical
representatives of the relevant stakeholder knowledge come together.
groups and by scientists.
The following three pages provide information
The initiation phase financed by the Plettner on the DiDaT process, transdisciplinary
Foundation within the Stifterverband began in organisation and methods (see page 4).
October 2018. As a DiDaT product, orientations
(i.e. “socially robust orientations”) are compiled
in a white paper through a suitable
combination of knowledge from research and
practice.
1
DiDaT: Products and results of the fully-fledged transdisciplinary project
1. Initiation Phase 2. Planning Phase 3. Core Phase 4. Networking, discursive dissemination phase, End
and real-world Transdisciplinarity (Td) Labs
27/03/19 25/06/19 01/20 06/20 02/21
10/18 06/19 01/20 07/20 07/21
Start 3rd Stakeholder 4th Stakeholder Outcomes: white book related
Kickoff 1st Stakeholder 2nd Stakeholder
• Report about consensus-
Meeting conference conference conference conference oriented consultation process
of the white book including
Formation of goals, Exploring opportunity and Establishing Workplan on options, Presenting the “discussed and several hundred
vulnerability spaces, transdisciplinarity, presenting opportunities and innovations agreed” white book including representatives of key
Figure 1. DiDaT Overview of project phases
perspectives and building
first partnerships preparing innovation spaces work plan for identifying (60 scientists, 50 practitioners) socially robust orientations stakeholder groups
(45 scientists, 30 practitioners) options, opportunities and on innovations and follow-up • Presenting a white book with
(25 scientists and 11 1. First draft of white book on clear orientations, actions,
practitioners) innovations related to actions
Steps for all seven spaces vulnerabilities, and innovations towards
potential vulnerabilities (60 scientists, 50
1. Goal formation via shared opportunities, options, and sustainable digital data use in
1. Conceptual Frame (50 scientists, 45 practitioners) practitioners)
Guiding Question innovations of the digital general and for the
2. Transdisc. Methodology 2. First classification transition perspectives of vulnerability
3. Pre-Projects 1. Ratification of a 2. Description of mechanisms 1. Handover of white book to spaces
opportunities &
• Stock and flow-based transdisciplinary agreement and underlying processes the public, business and • Self-declarations and clear
vulnerabilities and their
actor analysis among participants and 3. Presentation of scientific industry actors after an commitments of
mechanisms (towards
• Comparative legal analysis innovations) extended Chatham rules and/or societal challenges extensive consultation stakeholders
5. Kickoff-Meeting 3. First (method-based-) 2. Presenting a differentiated (with respect to challenges, process
stakeholder analysis work plan for a deliberative which become “learning 2. Priority list of critical Outcomes: Td Lab related
6. Booklet «1. Konzeptskizze»
4. First draft of the work plan transdisciplinary process cases”). vulnerabilities and potential (10-50 practitioners and 5-10
of the core phase including (scientists & representatives The goal is to develop options opportunities and scientists in each Td-Lab)
First steps in of key stakeholder groups)
• Methods of knowledge and to establish DiDaT Td- comprehensive assessment Presenting action strategies,
• Partnership building 3. Plan/budget for financing
integration Labs convening stakeholders of actions on innovations in guidelines etc. for “learning
• Joint problem / goal research digital data management cases” such as
• Very first ideas about and practitioners for finding
definition 4. Rough classification of pathways for innovations in 3. Detailed first report on • Viability of SME branches
follow-up processes
• Defining system (cases/Td-Lab) opportunities & real world settings valuable follow-up initiatives due to digital data use
boundaries vulnerabilities for (managed by BTU in the DiDaT Td-Labs • Internet overuse and
5. Finding a balance between
• Defining opportunity «supporting research» and Transformation Lab) 4. Writing scientific papers addiction
science and practice
spaces and vulnerabilities financing thereof • Misuse of data from
knowledge-potential
5. First draft of potential wearables
options and social and • Avoiding communities’
Continuing partnership overdependence of digital
building technological innovations
technology providers
2
DiDaT: Organizational Chart* (March 19, 2020)
Science Practice
Transdisciplinary Project Leaders
Ortwin Renn (IASS), Roland W. Scholz (IASS, Donau Uni Krems / DUK), Markus Beckedahl (Netzpolitik),
Stephan Noller (ubirch, Bundesverband Digitale Wirtschaft)
Steering Board
Speakers: C. Eckert (LMU, Fraunhofer AISEC), M. Mißler-Behr Speakers: H.-J. Sippel (Stiftung Mitarbeit), T. Thiele
(BTU). Members: D. Helbing (ETH Zürich), G. Gigerenzer (MPI für (Deutsche Bahn). Members: T. Clausen (Edelmann Media),
Bildungsforschung, Berlin), M. Latzer (Uni Zürich), R. Neuburger H. Gleiss (Nettz), S. Ober (NABU), C. Ulmer (Telekom), M.
(Münchner Kreis), P. Parycek (Fraunhofer Fokus, DUK, Deutscher Scheier (DGB), S. Lehmann-Brauns (ZVEI)
Digitalrat), C. Woopen/M. Friele (Uni Düsseldorf, Deutscher The German Federal Commissioner for Data Protection
Ethikrat) (BfDI) assists in an advisory function S. Hermerschmidt, A.
Zeeb-Schwanhäuser
Project Team
Project Management: D. Marx (BTU), V. van Zyl-Bulitta (IASS), L. Kätker (BTU), M. Mönch (BTU). Senior legal expert: G. Lentner
(DUK). Td-Method Lab: C. Hartmann (BTU), H.P. Takam (BTU)
Vulnerability Spaces
Impact-oriented Vulnerability Spaces
Science Topics/Facilitators Practice
Mobility (01)
W. Canzler (WZB), J. Maesse (Uni Giessen), W. K. M. Hofmann (Network D. Baidinger (Deutsch Bahn), E. Fischer (VDV),
Palmetshofer (Open Knowledge Foundation), Institute) K. Teille (VW AutoUni), J. Tiffe (Form:f), T.
U. Reisach (HS Neu-Ulm), L. Schebek (TU Waschke (Denkbank), C. Wust (Ford Europe)
Darmstadt), W. Serbser (DGH Hochschule),
Health (02)
G. Antes (Uni Freiburg), G. Glaeske (Uni H. Köckler (HSG Gesundheit M. Danner (BAG), A. Eichhorn (humatrix), S.
Bremen), F. Tretter (LMU), M. Friele (UK Köln), Bochum), L.A. Rosenberger Sauerland (IQWiG), S. Völker (KV W-L), M.
N.N, N.N. (Uni Wien) Weller (Spitzenverband der Krankenkassen)
SME (03)
G. Müller-Christ (Uni Bremen), A. Reichel R. Czichos (DUK, CTN) W. Hofmann (TMG), G. Knienieder (EMUGE),
(Zukunftsinstitut Karlsruhe). G. Steiner (DUK), L. Probst (IHK Cottbus), K. Weßner (puls-
F. Goll (FZI Karlsruhe), N.N., N.N. marktforschung), T. Schauf (VDI, Telekom) H.
Haimo (ZVEI), O. Suchy (DG-BVV)
Agriculture (04)
G. Berger (ZALF) R. Brunsch (Leibniz ATB), J. Zscheischler (Leibniz ZALF) H. Buitkamp (VDMA Landtechnik), H.-W.
J. Dörr (Fraunhofer IESE), C. Reichel (Leibniz Griepentrog (DLG, Digitalisierungsausschuss,
IBZ), L. Frerichs (tbc) (Uni Braunschweig), N.N. Uni Hohenheim), C. Tölle-Nolting (NABU),
T. Strobel-Unbehaun (FIBL), P. Pascher
(Bauernverband), M. Nachtmann (BASF)
Value- and Impact-oriented
Social Media (05)
P. Freytag (tbc), N. Kersting, (Uni Münster), C. R. Hess (Werkstatt für F. Ebner (Mecodia), H. Gleiss (Nettz), N.N.
Montag (Uni Ulm), L.-M. Neudert (Uni Innovation, Berlin) (Cyberstalking), C. Reher (Platform 161), B.
Oxford), C. Sindermann (Uni Ulm), N.N. Thull (LFK Stuttgart), A. Schenk (semasio)
Institution- and Regulation-oriented
Reliable and Trustworthy Digital Data (06)
A. Kaminski (Uni Stuttgart), M. Reissig (IASS), J. Lambing (Forschung Gutes S. Hallensleben (VDE), M. Breuer (Ubirch), M.
C. Reuter (Darmstadt), J. Mittelbach (BTU), S. Leben), Kabisch, S. Fuchs (Blogger und Politikberater), S. Thürmel
Schreiber (BTU) (München), , J. Scholz (Social Media Partisan),
N.N.
Cybercrime (07)
P. Gladyshev (UC Dublin), D. Labudde (HS E. Albrecht (BTU), D. Marx B. Brocher (Sonderstaatsanwaltschaft Ctb), V.
Mittweida), H. Hug (BTU/TMS), (BTU) Hagen (Land Vorarlberg), D. Nagel (Vodafone),
A. Panchenko (BTU), N.N., N.N. B. Otupal (Dell), H. Wu (Huawei)
Cross cutting expert groups
Data economy DNA Data
M. Dopf (Admeira), C. Reher (platform 161, BVDW), A. Schenk (Semasio), R.W. A. Eichhorn (Humatrix), G. Glaeske (Uni
Scholz (IASS, DUK), S.W. Scholz (Interrogare), P. Wiegelmann (Interrorgare, BDM) Bremen), R.W. Scholz (IASS, DUK)
External Support Groups
Science Experts DiDaT MdB Monitoring Group
G. Beier (IASS), S. Diefenbach (LMU), H. Mieg (HU Berlin), M. Beermann, M. Biadecz, T. Schipanski (CDU), M. Höferlin (FDP),
T. Santarius (TU Berlin), U. Schneidewind (Wuppertal Tabea Rößner (Bündnis90/Die Grünen), P. Sitte (Die Linke), J.
Institut), D. Wruk (Uni Mannheim), K. Zweig (Uni Zimmermann (SPD)
Kaiserslautern)
Experts in Law and Digitalization Global Digital Market Leaders
C. App (DUK), G. Lentner (DUK), M. Mayrhofer (Uni Linz) M. Senges (Google, tbc), P. Müller (Amazon tbc), T. Böhm
(Microsoft, tbc), N.N., N.N.
Figure 2. DiDaT Organigram (with selected vulnerability spaces) 3Methods applied in blue boxes
Expert Round Tables
Progression and Methodology of DiDaT
Proposition-based
0. Preprojects
2015-2019 ReDE: Research in unintended side effects as subject of research at Austrian Universities (DUK:
Danube University Krems)
2017: Japanese Expert Round Table on Unintended Side effects of the Digital Transition (Univ. of Tokyo, DUK)
2017: Proposition-based European Expert Round Table on Unintended Side effects of the Digital Transition
(BMBF FONA, DUK )
2018: Proposition-based South American Expert Round Table on Unintended Side effects of the Digital
Hierarchical Cluster
Transition (PUCR, DUK)
The most severe unseens of the digital transition emerge
Analyses
Main message
from the insufficient understanding of ownership,
economic value, access, and use of digital data
2018: Renn & Scholz agree to run an transdisciplinary project on responsible use of data: DiDaT
2018: The Plettner Foundation (Stifterverband) provides funding for the initiation phase
Derivation of first guiding question on
unseens endangering responsible Use of Data
Impact spaces of unseens of
The cycle was done three
the space of unresponsible data use
un-responsible data use
construction of vulnerabilities based on social and
times for each vulnerability
Vulnerability Spaces space during stages of Guiding
Iterated definition of guiding question and
Impact-oriented • Concept drafts Question
1. Mobility
• Gross plan
• Detailed plan
Faceting
System
technological innovations
2. Health Plans for constructing
action/ innovation analysis
3. SME and digitalization
scenarios
4. Agriculture
Value-oriented
5. Social media
Intervention
Identifying
strategies for sin-
Institution- and regulation-oriented
gular vulnerabilities vulnerabilities
6. Reliable and trustworthy ecosystems
7. Cybercrime and Cybersecurity Describing (if-then)
mechanism of
(singular)
1./2. Initiation and planning phase vulnerabilities
Stakeholder
Selection of representatives
mapping
of six key stakeholder
groups (and researchers
from six disciplines)
Detailed plan-based production of White Book
DiDaT Td Methods Lab
Accompanying research for
clarifying critical issues
Rank order and classify vulnerabilities and/or Methods of knowledge
Whitebook chapter
their mechanisms integration
production
3. Core phase • Scenario formation and
Construct social and technological innovation evaluation
scenarios • Relating causal
mechanisms
Describe implementation of main scenarios • Multivariate statistics
• Others
which increase adaptive capacity
Discursive Consulting of white book
4. Networking, discursive dissemina- Follow-up processes in
tion phase, and real-world Td-Labs Release of White book
Real-world/transdisciplinarity Laboratories
Figure 3: History, context and methodical procedure of DiDaT
Responsible use of digital data: Digital Data as Subject of a Transdisciplinary Project (DiDaT)
Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam (IASS) e.V. , D-14467 Potsdam, Berliner Strasse 130
Tel: +49 (0) 331- 288 -22 300 / 277 34, www.iass-potsdam.de
4
Contact: Ortwin Renn: Ortwin.Renn@iass-potsdam.de Roland Scholz: Roland.Scholz@iass-potsdam.de
4
Verena van Zyl-Bulitta: vzb@iass-potsdam.de and Dirk Marx: dirk.marx@b-tu.deYou can also read
