DETECTION OF REDOX PROPERTIES OF (6,5)-ENRICHED SINGLE-WALLED CARBON NANOTUBES USING POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE (KMNO4)
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
C Journal of Carbon Research Article Detection of Redox Properties of (6,5)-Enriched Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Using Potassium Permanganate (KMnO4) Yuji Matsukawa * and Kazuo Umemura Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 1628601, Japan; meicun2006@163.com * Correspondence: 2214101@alumni.tus.ac.jp; Tel.: +81-3-5228-8228 Received: 2 April 2020; Accepted: 7 May 2020; Published: 11 May 2020 Abstract: It has been reported that even if single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) are coated with the same polymer, the redox characteristics change of each chirality may differ. Particularly, the addition of hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) minimally affects the near-infrared (NIR) absorption spectra of the dsDNA-(6,5)-enriched SWNT complex (DNA-SWNT complex). Detecting the redox properties of (6,5) chirality using NIR absorption spectra has been one of the issues to be solved. We hypothesized that an oxidizing agent with high oxidizing power is required to detect the absorption spectra of (6,5) chirality. In this study, we used KMnO4 , which contains atoms with a high oxidation number. A dispersion was prepared by mixing 0.5 mg of (6,5)-enriched SWNT powder with 1 mg/mL of DNA solution. After adding H2 O2 or KMnO4 to this dispersion and oxidizing it, catechin solutions were added to reduce the dispersion. The absorption peak of the DNA-SWNT complex decreased by 23.9% following the addition of KMnO4 (final concentration: 0.5 µM) and recovered 30.7% following the addition of the catechin solution. We revealed that the changes in the absorption spectra change of (6,5) chirality, which could not be detected by H2 O2 , can be detected by using KMnO4 . We also varied the concentration of KMnO4 and verified whether the adsorption of KMnO4 can be modeled as a Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Keywords: carbon nanotube; DNA; potassium permanganate; near-infrared; redox 1. Introduction Single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs) can be synthesized by using different methods. Common methods include the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method, in which a carbon-based gas is blown into a heating furnace with a carrier gas to synthesize SWNTs [1–4]; the arc discharge method, in which DC or AC is applied to graphite electrodes to grow SWNTs [5,6]; and the laser evaporation method, in which graphite is used as a carbon source to facilitate heating and evaporation by laser irradiation and obtain SWNTs [7]. In a recent study, Haque et al. reported that CVD-synthesized multi-walled carbon nanotubes were converted to diamonds, without the addition of a catalyst, following application of a nanosecond pulsed laser melting process at ambient temperature and air pressure [8]. Additionally, Narayan et al. realized the epitaxial growth of diamond nanofibers by applying a nanosecond laser melting technique to supercooled carbon nanofibers and nanotubes, followed by rapid cooling [9]. The SWNTs produced as a result of employing these methods have a cylindrical one-dimensional structure rolled with graphene sheets, and have excellent electrical characteristics. SWNTs have optical characteristics that are strongly dependent on how the graphene sheet is wound, which can be represented by the chiral vector (n, m) [10–14]. It is very important to have a deep understanding of the electrical properties of each chirality from the fundamental and applied perspectives of carbon C 2020, 6, 30; doi:10.3390/c6020030 www.mdpi.com/journal/carbon
C 2020, 6, 30 2 of 9 nanotubes. To date, many studies on redox characteristics focusing on the optical response of carbon nanotubes have been reported [15–19]. However, because the optical response of (6,5) chirality to H2 O2 is weak, detecting the redox properties in the near-infrared (NIR) absorption spectra is one of the issues to be solved. Polo et al. investigated the effects of reducing and oxidizing small molecules on the NIR fluorescence of polymer-wrapped SWNTs. They reported that the (6,5) chirality of SWNTs decreased by 81% from the initial state as a result of adding the oxidizing agent riboflavin; it also increased by 141% from the initial state as a result of adding the reducing agent ascorbic acid. They found that the fluorescence of reductive molecules of compounds such as ascorbic acid, epinephrine, and Trolox only significantly increases when SWNTs are suspended in a negatively charged polymer such as DNA or polyacrylic acid [20,21]. However, their study focused on the photoluminescence (PL) intensity of SWNTs, and did not include an investigation into the characteristics of the absorption spectra. Zheng et al. found that electron transfer occurs readily between small molecule redox reagents and semiconducting carbon nanotubes. Furthermore, a direct correlation between the bandgap of semiconductor nanotubes and their reduction potential was identified. In their study, they showed that (6,5)-enriched SWNTs can be easily oxidized by adding potassium (IV) chloroiridate (K2 IrCl6 ) as an oxidant; they found that changes in concentration affected the absorption spectra [22]. However, they did not report on the KMnO4 -induced redox action of SWNTs. Our group has previously investigated the (9,4) and (8,7) chirality of SWNTs; we consequently determined the redox characteristics of SWNTs by applying NIR and PL in order to reveal the optical response of SWNTs to H2 O2 and catechin [23,24]. In these papers, we reported that it was difficult to determine the extent of oxidation because the optical response was weak, even when H2 O2 was added to the DNA-(6,5)-enriched SWNT complex coated with DNA. In this study, we focused on the oxidation numbers of the atoms contained in the oxidizing agent and compared the oxidation numbers of the atoms contained in H2 O2 and KMnO4 . The oxidation number of the oxygen (O2) in H2 O2 is −1, and the oxidation number of the manganese (Mn) in KMnO4 is +7. The difference is clear; therefore, we used KMnO4 , which contains atoms with a high oxidation number. KMnO4 (oxidant) and catechin (reductant) solutions were sequentially added to the DNA-SWNT complex, and the NIR and PL spectra were measured. The results revealed a clear optical response that can be attributed to redox of the (6,5) chirality. Additionally, we show that the oxidation state of the (6,5) chirality can be determined by using KMnO4 and analyzing the absorption spectra. 2. Materials and Methods For this study, (6,5)-enriched SWNT powder (No. 773735-250G), which was manufactured by using CoMoCAT synthesis method, and dsDNA (deoxyribonucleic acid sodium salt from salmon testes, D1626) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC (St. Louis, MO, USA). Hydrogen peroxide (abt. 30%, 084-07441) and catechin (553-74471) were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka City, Osaka, Japan). Potassium permanganate solution (No. 42000375) was obtained from Hayashi Pure Chemical Ind., Ltd. (Osaka City, Osaka, Japan). A 1 mg/mL dsDNA solution was prepared with a 10 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane- HCl (Tris-HCL) buffer (pH 7.9). To untangle the dsDNA molecules, the solution was sonicated, on ice, in a bath-type ultrasonicator (80 W) for 90 min. Finally, the dsDNA solution was gently shaken for 3 h. To prepare the dsDNA-(6,5)-enriched SWNT complex, 0.5 mg of SWNT powder and 1 mL of the dsDNA stock solution were mixed and sonicated on ice for 1.5 h using a probe-type sonicator (3W, VCX130, Sonic & Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT, USA). The supernatant of the prepared dsDNA-(6,5)-enriched SWNT dispersion was stored after undergoing 17,360 g centrifugation at a temperature of 8 ◦ C for a period of 3 h [25–27]. A UV–vis spectrophotometer (V-630, JASCO Corp., Hachioji City, Tokyo, Japan) was employed for NIR measurements. NIR measurement entailed mixing the DNA-SWNT complex and 440 µL of Tris-HCL buffer in a cuvette and recording the initial absorbance spectra. Subsequently, an oxidant
CC 2020, 2020, 6, 6, x30FOR PEER REVIEW 33of of99 (final concentration: 9.8 mM) diluted with sterilized water was added to the sample, and the (H2 O2 or KMnO absorbance 4 ) was spectra added were separately measured to the sample. following 30 min In of the case of Hat incubation 2 O24 2 addition, 5 µL °C. In the of H case of2 O 2 (final KMnO 4 concentration: 9.8 mM) diluted with sterilized water was added to the sample, and the addition, 5 µL of KMnO4 (final concentration: 0.5 µM) diluted with sterilized water was added to the absorbance spectra were measured following 30 were min ofmeasured incubation at 24 ◦ sample, and the absorbance spectra after 10 C. minInof the case of KMnO incubation addition, at 244 °C. Finally,5 µL 5 µLof KMnO (final of catechin 4 concentration: 0.5 µM) diluted with sterilized water was added to the sample, solution (final concentration: 6.2 mM) was added to the sample and the absorbance spectra and the absorbance were spectra were measured after 10 min of incubation at 24 ◦ C. Finally, 5 µL of catechin solution measured. (final concentration: 6.2 mM) was added to the sample and the absorbance spectra were measured. 3. Results 3. Results Figure Figure 11 shows shows aa conceptual conceptual diagram diagram of of the the experiment. experiment. The The DNA-SWNT DNA-SWNT complexes complexes were were oxidized with H oxidized with H2 O2 or KMnO4 , and catechin was added to detect changes in the NIR-ABSspectra. 2 O2 or KMnO 4 , and catechin was added to detect changes in the NIR-ABS spectra. 1.AAconceptual Figure 1. Figure conceptualdiagram diagram of of the the experiment. experiment. The The final final concentrations concentrations of of H O22 and H22O and KMnO KMnO44 were were 9.8 mM and 0.50 µM, respectively, for NIR-ABS. The final catechin concentration was 6.2 mM. 9.8 mM and 0.50 µM, respectively, for NIR-ABS. The final catechin concentration was 6.2 mM. SWNT: SWNT: single-walled carbon single-walled carbon nanotube; nanotube; NIR: NIR: near-infrared; near-infrared; ABS: ABS: Absorbance. Absorbance. Figure 2 shows the absorption spectra that were obtained following H2 O2 addition to the Figure 2 shows the absorption spectra that were obtained following H2O2 addition to the DNA- DNA-SWNT complex and subsequent addition of an aqueous catechin solution. The absorbance in the SWNT complex and subsequent addition of an aqueous catechin solution. The absorbance in the initial state was 0.466, and the absorption peak appeared at 992 nm. Thirty minutes after the addition initial state was 0.466, and the absorption peak appeared at 992 nm. Thirty minutes after the addition of H O , the absorbance was 0.465, which corresponds to a decrease of only 0.13% from the initial of H22O22, the absorbance was 0.465, which corresponds to a decrease of only 0.13% from the initial state. Additionally, 10 min after the addition of the catechin solution, the absorbance was 0.462, which state. Additionally, 10 min after the addition of the catechin solution, the absorbance was 0.462, which corresponds to a decrease of 0.73%. This was 99.1% of the initial state. The absorption peaks at the corresponds to a decrease of 0.73%. This was 99.1% of the initial state. The absorption peaks at the times of H O addition and catechin addition were both 992 nm, and no peak shift was observed. times of H22O22addition and catechin addition were both 992 nm, and no peak shift was observed. These results are similar to those reported in previous studies [24]. These results are similar to those reported in previous studies [24]. Because an H2 O2 concentration of 9.8 mM did not significantly change the absorbance at oxidation, the concentration of H2 O2 was increased by 10 times (final concentration: 98 mM) to determine whether changes in the absorption spectra could be observed. The results are available as Supplemental Materials Figure S1. There was no significant change in the absorbance, even though the H2 O2 concentration was increased by 10 times. To confirm that H2 O2 was effectively acting on the SWNTs, the absorption
C 2020, 6, 30 4 of 9 spectra of the (8,7) chirality of the dsDNA-SWNT (HiPco: High-Pressure carbon monoxide) complex were measured using the same H2 O2 solution. The (8,7) chirality of the dsDNA-SWNT (HiPco) complex was observed to have SWNT-specific redox characteristics (Supplemental Materials Figure S2). Specifically, the absorbance decreased by 15.0 % as a result of H2 O2 addition, and then recovered by 21.7% C 2020, 6, xfollowing the addition of catechin. FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 9 Figure 2. Absorption spectra of the DNA-SWNT complex following the addition of H2 O2 and catechin. Figure 2. Absorption spectra of the DNA-SWNT complex following the addition of H2O2 and catechin. H2 O2 did not significantly change the spectra. H2O2 did not significantly change the spectra. Figure 3 shows the absorption spectra of the DNA-SWNT complex with and without KMnO4 Because an H2O2 concentration of 9.8 mM did not significantly change the absorbance at (final concentration: 0.5 µM), and with catechin. The absorbance, which was negligibly affected by the oxidation, the concentration of H2O2 was increased by 10 times (final concentration: 98 mM) to addition of H2 O2 , significantly decreased in response to KMnO4 addition. The peak wavelength was determine whether changes in the absorption spectra could be observed. The results are available as 992 nm for the initial state. Ten minutes after the addition of KMnO4 , the peak shifted to 985.5 nm. Supplemental Materials S1. There was no significant change in the absorbance, even though the H2O2 However, 10 min concentration wasafter the addition increased of catechin, by 10 times. To confirm thethat peak H2wavelength recovered O2 was effectively actingtoon992 thenm. SWNTs,This finding confirms that the absorption spectra of theKMnO 4 can effectively oxidize the (6,5) chirality. Additionally, (8,7) chirality of the dsDNA-SWNT (HiPco: High-Pressure H O 2 2 requires carbonan incubation monoxide)time of 30 were complex min. measured To determineusingthethe incubation same H2O time required under the condition of KMnO 2 solution. The (8,7) chirality of the dsDNA-4 addition, SWNT (HiPco) complex was observed to have SWNT-specificstate the time required for the complex to reach a stable redoxfollowing KMnO(Supplemental characteristics 4 addition was measured; the incubation Materials S2). Specifically,time the was determined absorbance to be by decreased 10 min 15.0 (Supplemental % as a result of Materials Figure H2O2 addition, andS3). then Table 1 summarizes the effects of recovered by 21.7% following the addition of catechin.KMnO 4 concentration on the peak absorbance and peak wavelength results for the DNA-SWNT complex. In this experiment, Figure 3 shows the absorption spectra of the DNA-SWNT complex with and without KMnO we detected changes in the 4 absorption spectrum 0.5 (final concentration: in µM), the KMnO and with4 concentration catechin. Therange of 0.05which absorbance, to 1.0was µM. Increasing negligibly the final affected by concentration the addition of ofHKMnO 4 was found 2O2, significantly to correspond decreased to a negative in response to KMnOpeak wavelength 4 addition. The peakshift. The peak wavelength wavelength was not affected by the addition of 0.05 µM of KMnO ; however, was 992 nm for the initial state. Ten minutes after the addition of4 KMnO4, the peak shifted a KMnO 4 concentration to 985.5 ofnm.1.0However, µM corresponded 10 min after tothe a total decrease addition of 6.5 the of catechin, nm.peak Then, when the wavelength complex recovered wasnm. to 992 reduced This with catechin, the initial peak wavelength was fully recovered. Supplemental finding confirms that KMnO4 can effectively oxidize the (6,5) chirality. Additionally, H2O2 requires Materials Figure S4anshows the three-experiment-average incubation time of 30 min. To determine absorption spectra, astime the incubation measured requiredbyunder increasing the KMnO the condition of4 concentration KMnO4 addition, fromthe 0.05time to 1.0 µM. It can required for be theseen that the complex absorbance to reach gradually a stable decreased state following KMnO as the KMnO4 4 addition concentration was measured; increased. the incubation time was determined to be 10 min (Supplemental Materials S3).
C 2020, 6, 30 5 of 9 C 2020, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 9 Figure3.3. Absorption Figure Absorption spectra spectra of of DNA-SWNT DNA-SWNT complex complex with KMnO44 and and catechin. catechin. The Theabsorption absorptionpeak peak decreased by 23.9% following the addition of KMnO , and recovered by 30.7% as a result of adding decreased by 23.9% following the addition of KMnO4 , and recovered by 30.7% as a result of adding the 4 the catechin catechin solution. solution. Table1. 1Effects Table of KMnO4the summarizes concentration effects of on the absorption KMnO spectra and shift in the peak position. These 4 concentration on the peak absorbance and peak data are presented as the average of three independent experiments. wavelength results for the DNA-SWNT complex. In this experiment, The final we catechin detectedconcentration changes in the was 6.2 mM. There was a correlation between KMnO4 concentration and the extent of the redox reaction. absorption spectrum in the KMnO4 concentration range of 0.05 to 1.0 µM. Increasing the final concentration KMnO4 Final of KMnO4 was found to correspond to aAbsorbance Peak negative peak wavelength shift. The peak wavelength was Concentration not affected by the addition of 0.05 µM of KMnO4; however, a KMnO4 concentration KMnO4 Change Rate Catechin Change Rate from of 1.0(µM) Initial State µM corresponded to a totalAddition decrease of 6.5 nm. Then, when the complex was reduced with from Initial State Addition KMnO 4 Addition catechin, the initial peak wavelength was fully recovered. Supplemental Materials S4 shows the 1.00 0.465 ± 0.003 0.321 ± 0.009 −31.1 ± 1.22% 0.462 ± 0.003 44.2 ± 2.46% three-experiment-average absorption spectra, as measured by increasing the KMnO4 concentration 0.50 0.466 ± 0.004 0.354 ± 0.004 −23.9 ± 0.18% 0.463 ± 0.004 30.7 ± 0.43% from 0.05 to 1.0 µM. It can be seen that the absorbance gradually decreased as the KMnO4 0.25 concentration 0.469 ± 0.004 increased. 0.406 ± 0.005 −13.5 ± 0.31% 0.467 ± 0.004 14.9 ± 0.38% 0.17 0.466 ± 0.005 0.425 ± 0.004 −8.72 ± 0.11% 0.463 ± 0.005 8.72 ± 0.11% Table 0.10 1. Effects of KMnO 4 concentration on the absorption spectra and shift in the peak position. 0.467 ± 0.003 0.449 ± 0.001 −3.97 ± 0.43% 0.465 ± 0.003 3.53 ± 0.51% These data are presented as the average of three independent experiments. The final catechin 0.05 0.467 ± 0.003 0.459 ± 0.003 −1.61 ± 0.01% 0.464 ± 0.003 0.915 ± 0.03% concentration was 6.2 mM. There was a correlation between KMnO4 concentration and the extent of KMnO Finalreaction. the 4redox Peak Wavelength (nm) Concentration KMnO4 Shift from Initial Catechin Shift from Initial (µM)4 Final Initial State Peak Absorbance KMnO Addition State Addition State Change Rate Concentration KMnO4 Change Rate from 1.00 992.0 ± 0.000 Initial State 985.5 ± 1.886 −6.5 from ± 1.540 Catechin Initial 992.0 ± 0.000 Addition 0.0 ± 0.000 (µM) Addition KMnO4 Addition State 0.50 992.0 ± 0.000 988.0 ± 0.816 −4.0 ± 0.667 992.0 ± 0.000 0.0 ± 0.000 1.00 0.465 ± 0.003 0.321 ± 0.009 −31.1 ± 1.22% 0.462 ± 0.003 44.2 ± 2.46% 0.25 0.50 992.0 ± 0.000 0.466 0.354±± 0.000 ± 0.004 990.0 0.004 −2.0 −23.9 ± 0.000 ± 0.18% 992.0 0.463 ± 0.000 ± 0.004 0.0 ±±0.43% 30.7 0.000 0.25 0.17 0.469 ± 0.004 992.0 ± 0.000 0.406 ± 0.005 991.0 ± 0.000 −13.5 ± 0.31% −1.0 ± 0.000 0.467 ± 0.004 992.0 ± 0.000 14.9 ± 0.38% 0.0 ± 0.000 0.17 0.466 ± 0.005 0.425 ± 0.004 −8.72 ± 0.11% 0.463 ± 0.005 8.72 ± 0.11% 0.10 0.10 992.0 ± 0.000 0.467 0.449±± 0.471 ± 0.003 991.0 0.001 −1.0 −3.97 ± 0.000 ± 0.43% 992.0 0.465 ± 0.000 ± 0.003 0.0 ±±0.51% 3.53 0.000 0.05 0.05 0.467 992.0 ± 0.003 992.0 ± 0.000 0.459±± 0.000 0.003 −1.61 0.0± 0.01% ± 0.000 0.464 ± 0.003 992.0 ± 0.000 0.915 0.0 ± ± 0.03% 0.000 KMnO4 Final Peak Wavelength (nm) Concentration KMnO4 Shift from Shift from Initial 4. Discussion Initial State Catechin Addition (µM) Addition Initial State State 1.00 992.0 ± 0.000 985.5 ± 1.886 −6.5 ± 1.540 992.0 ± 0.000 0.0 ± 0.000 Regarding 0.50 the mechanism 992.0 ± 0.000 of 988.0 oxidation, ± 0.816 Tu et al. reported that −4.0 ± 0.667 the spectral intensity 992.0 ± 0.000 of the first 0.0 ± 0.000 interband0.25 transitions for the 992.0 (10,5)/(8,7) ± 0.000 990.0chirality ± 0.000 of −2.0 semiconducting ± 0.000 nanotubes 992.0 ± 0.000 decreased0.0as± 0.000 the SWNTs 0.17 992.0 ± 0.000 991.0 ± 0.000 −1.0 ± 0.000 992.0 ± 0.000 0.0 ± 0.000 0.10 992.0 ± 0.000 991.0 ± 0.471 −1.0 ± 0.000 992.0 ± 0.000 0.0 ± 0.000
0.05 992.0 ± 0.000 992.0 ± 0.000 0.0 ± 0.000 992.0 ± 0.000 0.0 ± 0.000 4. Discussion Regarding the mechanism of oxidation, Tu et al. reported that the spectral intensity of the first C 2020, 6, 30 6 of 9 interband transitions for the (10,5)/(8,7) chirality of semiconducting nanotubes decreased as the SWNTs reacted with H2O2, and that the transition intensity was reduced. This phenomenon occurs reactedHwith when 2O2 forms H2 O2a, and charge-transfer complexintensity that the transition with thewassidewall of SWNTs, reduced. which removes This phenomenon electrons occurs when from H O 2 2 the valence forms a band and charge-transfer increases complex the bandgap with the [17]. sidewall of SWNTs, which removes electrons from the We assumed that the shift in valence band and increases the bandgap [17]. the peak position was caused by redox reactions. At the time of oxidation, KMnO4that We assumed removes the shiftelectrons fromposition in the peak the valence band and was caused increases by redox the bandgap. reactions. This of At the time is believed to oxidation, KMnOincrease 4 energy removes and electrons decrease from the the peak valence wavelength. band and Conversely, increases the bandgap.during This reduction, is believed catechin to increasepromotes energy and the decrease removal the of oxygen, suppressesConversely, peak wavelength. the transferduring of electrons fromcatechin reduction, the valence band, promotes andremoval the reduces the bandgapsuppresses of oxygen, energy [28]. the This process transfer of is assumed electrons to reduce from energyband, the valence and increase the peak and reduces the wavelength. bandgap energy [28]. This process is assumed to reduce energy and increase the peak wavelength. Here, we Here, we focused focused on on the themaximum maximumadsorption adsorptionamount amountofofKMnO KMnO 4 and examined applicability of 4 and examined applicability thethe of Langmuir Langmuir adsorption adsorption isotherm. isotherm. For For this thispurpose, purpose,2 2toto1010 µM µM concentrations concentrations of KMnO44 were of KMnO were prepared, and the effects of KMnO prepared, and the effects of KMnO4 concentration on the absorbance were investigated. Figure 4 shows4 4 concentration on the absorbance were investigated. Figure shows the the results. results. It can beIt can seenbethat seenthere that was thereminimal was minimal change change in absorbance in absorbance betweenbetween 5 µM5and µM 10 andµM, 10 µM, suggesting suggesting thatsystem that the the system in thisinexperiment this experiment was saturated was saturated at 5 µM. at 5 µM. Figure 4. Absorbance as a function of KMnO4 concentration (0.05 to 10 µM). Figure 4. Absorbance as a function of KMnO4 concentration (0.05 to 10 µM). The absorbance peak at 5 µM was 0.253. Because the density of KMnO4 is 2.7 (g/cm33 = kg/L) The absorbance peak at 5 µM was 0.253. Because the density of KMnO4 is 2.7 (g/cm = kg/L) (PubChem CID 516875), the expected adsorption amount was (5.00 µmol/L ÷ 2.7 kg/L) = 1.852 µmol/kg. (PubChem CID 516875), the expected adsorption amount was (5.00 µmol/L ÷ 2.7 kg/L) = 1.852 Table S1 in Supplemental Materials shows the expected amount of adsorption at each concentration, µmol/kg. Table S1 in Supplemental Materials shows the expected amount of adsorption at each as determined based on the absorbance. More specifically, this is the value when the expected concentration, as determined based on the absorbance. More specifically, this is the value when the adsorption amount at 5 µM is assumed to be the adsorption amount corresponding to saturation expected adsorption amount at 5 µM is assumed to be the adsorption amount corresponding to (100%). The Langmuir adsorption isotherm is given as follows: saturation (100%). The Langmuir adsorption isotherm is given as follows: qm KC q= 1 + KC where q is the expected adsorption amount (µmol/kg), qm is the maximum adsorption amount (µmol/kg), where C q is the expected is equilibrium adsorption concentration amount (i.e., KMnO (µmol/kg), 4 molar qm is the concentration) maximum (µmol/L), and adsorption amount K is the adsorption (µmol/kg), coefficient. equilibrium is equilibrium concentration To determine (i.e., KMnO whether 4 molar concentration) the measured (µmol/L), and data fits the Langmuir’s K is the equation, adsorption the measured equilibrium values werecoefficient. applied to To the determine whether linear equation theC measured below. data and C/q were fits the plotted Langmuir’s to confirm that they have a linear relationship. The adsorption constants were derived from the slope and intercept of the linear line by solving the following equation. ! ! C 1 1 = + C q qm K qm
C 2020, 6, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 9 equation, the measured values were applied to the linear equation below. C and C/q were plotted to confirm that they have a linear relationship. The adsorption constants were derived from the slope and intercept of the linear line by solving the following equation. C 2020, 6, 30 7 of 9 1 1 = + C Table Table S2 S2 in in Supplemental SupplementalMaterials Materialsdescribes describesthetherelationship betweenCCand relationshipbetween andC/q, and C/q, Figure and S5 S5 Figure in Supplemental Materials shows C/q as a function of C. A linear line with in Supplemental Materials shows C/q as a function of C. A linear line with slope slope 1/q and intercept 1/q m 1/qm and interceptmK was 1/ obtained. The slope was obtained. andslope The intercept of the linear and intercept line linear of the in the line graphinisthe 0.523 andis0.0958, graph 0.523 respectively. and 0.0958, From these results, the maximum adsorption amount q m = 1.90 µmol/L and equilibrium respectively. From these results, the maximum adsorption amount qm = 1.90 µmol/L and equilibrium adsorption coefficient K = 5.48 kg/L were obtained. Figure 5 shows the results of using the above adsorption coefficient K = 5.48 kg/L were obtained. Figure 5 shows the results of using the above equation to calculate and equation to plot theand calculate expected adsorption plot the amount. The expected adsorption resultsThe amount. suggest that results the system suggest meets that the the system requirements for a Langmuir adsorption isotherm. meets the requirements for a Langmuir adsorption isotherm. 5. Expected Figure 5. Expected amount of adsorption at at various various concentrations. concentrations. The adsorption amount was values in calculated by implementing measured values in the the Langmuir Langmuir adsorption adsorption formula. formula. 5. Conclusions 5. Conclusions We proved We proved that that the the oxidation oxidation properties properties of of (6,5) (6,5) SWNT, SWNT,which whichcould couldnot notbebedetected detectedwhen whenH H22O O22 was was used usedasasanan oxidant, cancan oxidant, be detected by using be detected KMnOKMnO by using 4 , and that thethat 4, and redoxthe behavior redox can be elucidated behavior can be when KMnO elucidated 4 is used when KMnO in4 combination with catechin is used in combination withsolution. We foundWe catechin solution. that by increasing found KMnO4 that by increasing concentration, the peak wavelength decreased and the absorbance gradually KMnO4 concentration, the peak wavelength decreased and the absorbance gradually decreased. decreased. Analysis of the measured Analysis absorbance of the measuredresults revealed absorbance that the results magnitude revealed of the that the absorbance magnitude wasabsorbance of the correlated with was the concentration of KMnO correlated with the concentration 4 ; furthermore, we demonstrated that Langmuir of KMnO4; furthermore, we demonstrated thatisothermal adsorption Langmuircan be used to represent isothermal adsorption KMnO can be 4 adsorption on SWNTs. used to represent KMnO4 adsorption on SWNTs. Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/2/30/s1: Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1: Figure S1: Absorption Figure S1: Absorption spectra of dsDNA– (6,5)-Enriched SWNT Complex; Figure S2: Absorption spectra of spectra of dsDNA– dsDNA-SWNT (6, 5)-Enriched (HiPco) SWNT complex; Figure S3: Complex; Figure Measurement S2: Absorption of incubation spectra time for KMnOof dsDNA-SWNT (HiPco) 4 ; Figure S4: Absorption complex; spectra forFigure S3: Measurement each concentration of incubation of KMnO time 4 ; Table S1: for KMnO Expected 4; Figure amount S4: Absorption of adsorption spectra for Table at each concentration; each S2: Relationship of concentration between KMnO C 4and C/q; Figure ; Table S5: Relationship S1: Expected amount between C and C/q. of adsorption at each concentration; Table S2: Author Contributions: Relationship and C/q; Figure S5:Y.M.; between C Conceptualization: methodology: Relationship between C and Y.M.; C/q. validation: Y.M.; formal analysis: Y.M.; investigation: Y.M.; data curation: Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation: Y.M.; writing—review and editing: Author Y.M.; Contributions: supervision: Conceptualization: K.U.; project Y.M.; administration: methodology: Y.M. and K.U. All Y.M.; validation: authors have readY.M.; formaltoanalysis: and agreed Y.M.; the published version of the Y.M.; investigation: manuscript. data curation: Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation: Y.M.; writing—review and editing: Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Miyashiro of ESTEC CORP. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
C 2020, 6, 30 8 of 9 References 1. Ren, Z.F.; Huang, Z.P.; Wang, D.Z.; Wen, J.G. Growth of a single freestanding multiwall carbon nanotube on each nanonickel dot. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 1086–1088. [CrossRef] 2. Ren, Z.F.; Huang, Z.P.; Xu, J.W.; Wang, J.H.; Bush, P.; Siegal, M.P.; Provencio, P.N. Synthesis of large arrays of well-aligned carbon nanotubes on glass. Science 1998, 282, 1105–1107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. Queipo, P.; Nasibulin, A.G.; Shandakov, S.D.; Jiang, H.; Gonzalez, D.; Kauppinen, E.I. CVD synthesis and radial deformations of large diameter single-walled CNTs. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2009, 9, 301–305. [CrossRef] 4. Mondal, K.C.; Strydom, A.M.; Erasmus, R.M.; Keartland, J.M.; Coville, N.J. Physical properties of CVD boron-doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008, 111, 386–390. [CrossRef] 5. Haufler, R.E.; Conceicao, J.; Chibante, L.P.F.; Chai, Y.; Byrne, N.E.; Flanagan, S.; Haley, M.M.; O’Brien, S.C.; Pan, C.; Xiao, Z.; et al. Efficient production of C60 (buckminsterfullerene), C60 H36 , and the solvated buckide ion. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 8634–8636. [CrossRef] 6. Saito, Y.; Nishikubo, K.; Kawabata, K.; Matsumoto, T. Carbon nanocapsules and single-layered nanotubes produced with platinum-group metals (Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, Pt) by arc discharge. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 80, 3062–3067. [CrossRef] 7. Rinzler, A.G.; Liu, J.; Dai, H.; Nikolaev, P.; Huffman, C.B.; Rodríguez-Macías, F.J.; Boul, P.J.; Lu, A.H.; Heymann, D.; Colbert, D.T.; et al. Large-scale purification of single-wall carbon nanotubes: Process, product, and characterization. Appl. Phys.-Mater. Sci. Process. 1998, 67, 29–37. [CrossRef] 8. Haque, A.; Sachan, R.; Narayan, J. Synthesis of diamond nanostructures from carbon nanotube and formation of diamond-CNT hybrid structures. Carbon 2019, 150, 388–395. [CrossRef] 9. Narayan, J.; Bhaumik, A.; Hague, A. Pseudo-topotactic growth of diamond nanofibers. Acta Mater. 2019, 178, 179–185. [CrossRef] 10. Iijima, S.; Ichihashi, T. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 1993, 363, 603–605. [CrossRef] 11. Ivchenko, E.L.; Spivak, B. Chirality effects in carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 66, 9. [CrossRef] 12. Ajayan, P.M. Nanotubes from carbon. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1787–1799. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 13. Hamada, N.; Sawada, S.; Oshiyama, A. New one-dimensional conductors: Graphitic microtubules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 1579–1581. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 14. Ouyang, M.; Huang, J.L.; Lieber, C.M. Fundamental electronic properties and applications of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 1018–1025. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Xu, Y.; Pehrsson, P.E.; Chen, L.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, W. Double-stranded DNA single-walled carbon nanotube hybrids for optical hydrogen peroxide and glucose sensing. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 8638–8643. [CrossRef] 16. Hain, T.C.; Kröker, K.; Sticha, D.G.; Hertel, T. Influence of DNA conformation on the dispersion of SWNTs: Single-strand DNA vs. hairpin DNA. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 2820–2823. [CrossRef] 17. Tu, X.M.; Pehrsson, P.E.; Zhao, W. Redox reaction of DNA-Encased HiPco carbon nanotubes with hydrogen peroxide: A near infrared optical sensitivity and kinetics study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 17227–17231. [CrossRef] 18. Zhao, W.; Song, C.H.; Pehrsson, P.E. Water-soluble and optically pH-sensitive single-walled carbon nanotubes from surface modification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12418–12419. [CrossRef] 19. Song, C.H.; Pehrsson, P.E.; Zhao, W. Recoverable solution reaction of HiPco carbon nanotubes with hydrogen peroxide. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 21634–21639. [CrossRef] 20. Polo, E.; Kruss, S. Impact of Redox-Active Molecules on the Fluorescence of Polymer-Wrapped Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 3061–3070. [CrossRef] 21. Moore, V.C.; Strano, M.S.; Haroz, E.H.; Hauge, R.H.; Smalley, R.E.; Schmidt, J.; Talmon, Y. Individually suspended single-walled carbon nanotubes in various surfactants. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1379–1382. [CrossRef] 22. Ming, Z.; Diner, B.A. Solution redox chemistry of carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15490–15494. 23. Ishibashi, Y.; Ito, M.; Homma, Y.; Umemura, K. Monitoring the antioxidant effects of catechin using single-walled carbon nanotubes: Comparative analysis by near-infrared absorption and near-infrared photoluminescence. Colloids Surf. B-Biointerfaces 2018, 161, 139–146. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 24. Matsukawa, Y.; Ohura, S.; Umemura, K. Differences in the response of the near-infrared absorbance spectra of single-walled carbon nanotubes; Effects of chirality and wrapping polymers. Colloids Surf. B-Biointerfaces 2018, 172, 684–689. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
C 2020, 6, 30 9 of 9 25. Hayashida, T.; Kawashima, T.; Nii, D.; Ozasa, K.; Umemura, K. Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes Modified with DNA or Poly(ethylene glycol). Chem. Lett. 2013, 42, 666–668. [CrossRef] 26. Hayashida, T.; Umemura, K. Surface morphology of hybrids of double-stranded DNA and single-walled carbon nanotubes studied by atomic force microscopy. Colloids Surf. B-Biointerfaces 2013, 101, 49–54. [CrossRef] 27. Nii, D.; Hayashida, T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Ikawa, S.; Shibata, T.; Umemura, K. Selective binding of single-stranded DNA-binding proteins onto DNA molecules adsorbed on single-walled carbon nanotubes. Colloids Surf. B-Biointerfaces 2014, 121, 325–330. [CrossRef] 28. Pheomphun, P.; Treesubsuntorn, C.; Thirayetyan, P. Effect of exogenous catechin on alleviating O-3 stress: The role of catechin-quinone in lipid peroxidation, salicylic acid, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant enzymes of Zamioculcas zamiifolia. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, 374–383. [CrossRef] [PubMed] © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
You can also read