DESIGN STUDIOS - MELBOURNE SCHOOL OF DESIGN
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
MELBOURNE SCHOOL OF DESIGN DESIGN STUDIOS SEMESTER 1_2021 Master of Architecture A Master of Architecture C, D, E Master of Architecture Thesis Master of Landscape Architecture Master of Urban Design Master of Urban Planning
This material has been reproduced and communicated For use only by the students of the University of to you by or on behalf of the University of Melbourne in Melbourne enrolled in the Melbourne School of Design accordance with section 113P of the Copyright Act 1968 studios subjects. Melbourne (Act). School of Design The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject Faculty of Architecture, of copyright protection under the Act. Building and Planning Do not remove this notice. Printed on 100% recyled paper.
EXHIBITIONS EVENTS 15 MARCH - 5 APRIL 16 MARCH, 18:00 THE CLIMATE IMAGINARY ARCHITECTURE AS A GLOBAL SYSTEM: BOOK LAUNCH CITY STREETS + VIRTUAL DULUX GALLERY 1 MARCH - 5 APRIL 27 MARCH, FROM 8.30 AA PRIZE FOR UNBUILT WORK AIA PRESENTATION TO JURIES DULUX GALLERY THROUGHOUT THE GLYN DAVIS (MSD) BUILDING 26 MARCH - 16 APRIL 31 MARCH, 18:30 THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT : AA PRIZE FOR UNBUILT WORK - PANEL DISCUSSION DELWP/OGVA FUTURE HOMES COMPETITION DULUX GALLERY BASEMENT 3 APRIL, 19:00 1 MARCH - 5 APRIL POLITICS AND UTOPIA IN ARCHITECTURE: SHAPING POLITICS AND UTOPIA IN ARCHITECTURE FUTURE SOCIETIES - PANEL DISCUSSION NExT LAB YOUTUBE/NExT LAB 4 APRIL, 19:00 POLITICS AND UTOPIA IN ARCHITECTURE : KNOWING THE ANTHROPOCENE - PANEL DISCUSSION YOUTUBE/NExT LAB 5 APRIL, 19:00 POLITICS AND UTOPIA IN ARCHITECTURE : ARCHITECTURE AND INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS - VIRTUAL PANEL DISCUSSION YOUTUBE/NExT LAB ...AND MORE msd.unimelb.edu.au/events 3
NEW ELECTIVE SUBJECT Visions and Agendas in Architecture World War Z WHAT WILL YOUR FUTURE BE? Need help conceptualising and describing your design studio projects? Then this subject is for you. Help materialise your future. Vision and Agendas will introduce you to a body of theory and polemics for architectural design and spatial practice, from the late 20thc to today. It will help you formulate your own ‘position’ and identify and develop the conceptual interests that underpin your practice as a designer and spatial practitioner. And if you want, we will work with you on your current design studio project to help you find the key topics and ideas: the visual and written language to describe your project. Our readings cover: your origins, the role of process and diagrams, storytelling, materiality (what is it, how do you get it?), media, site/ground, bodies and space, the climate emergency, post-Architecture architecture, and new:202 1 design for social justice. ABPL90403_ Course leader: Dr Karen Burns Semester 1, 2021, Friday 11am – 1pm Melbourne School of Design Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning 4
WWW.NEWPAPER.SPACE WWW.AASCHOOL.AC.UK/STUDY/VISITING/MELBOURNE @AAVSMELBOURNE NEW PAPER Re-imagining the Phygital World AA VISITING SCHOOL MELBOURNE 05.07.2021 - 16.07.2021 ABPL90386 + ABPL30063 JOIN US ONLINE AND ON CAMPUS FOR NEW PAPER III (DUAL MODE DELIVERY) Today our experience of the world is being filtered through digital means and Architecture is no different. We decide where to visit on Tripadvisor, where to go on Google Earth and have designed museum’s specifi- cally for Instagram, even interior awards on Dezeen are now rendered. We absorb copious amounts of space through the lenses of our iris’, which as a result, has fast forwarded our dreams into an electric new world. From the filters on social media, spatial computing, decisions made on speculation, we live in a time where we are no longer able to tell the difference between physically built objects to virtually rendered landscapes, Image by Jeremy Bonwick + David Liu, The Toxic Forum Unit 5, 2020 and because of this, our understanding of environments need to fundamentally change. New Paper III continues this journey to explore and question the realms where Architecture is not only just physically constructed anymore. We will move into the blurring of the virtual world within our day-to-day lives; Architectural drawings will move beyond mere representations and become stories and experiences through amplification, gamification or provocation. We intend to re-think Architecture through the focus on today’s culture and share our bold visions of what is to come next. There will be a new breed of Architects. Are you with us? Features | Skills Developed Critically engage about the application of extended reality; virtual / augmented / mixed reality Explore and gain insight to the globalisation of virtual architecture Learn from global leaders in the digital space THIS IS A QUOTA SUBJECT. ADMISSION IS THROUGH PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT - PLEASE ENROL VIA STUDENT PORTAL AND EMAIL YOUR 5 PAGES PDF PORTFOLIO TO SUBJECT COORDINATOR: DR PAUL LOH paul.loh@unimelb.edu.au LAST DATE TO SELF-ENROL: 7TH JUNE 2021 5
ROBOTS, ADOBE 3D ONLINE TRAINING NOW PRINTING, AVAILABLE ON_SITE CONTACT US FOR MORE INFO ѣ җ юю SCAN THE QR CODE TO VISIT OUR WEBSITE 6
NExT NExT NExT 3D3D PRINTING PRINTING HOMEHOME DELIVERY DELIVERY SERVICE SERVICE RE-INITIALISING! VISITVISIT OUR OUR WEBSITE FOR MORE WEBSITE INFORMATION FOR MORE 3D PRINTING H INFORMATION DELIVERY SERV • FDM 3D PRINTING • 3D SCANNING • VRVISIT • AROUR WEBSITE FOR MORE • ON-SITE INTRO SESSIONS • ON-SITE/VIRTUAL CONSULTATIONS • DELIVERY SERVICE AVAILABLE HTTPS://MSD.UNIMELB.EDU.AU/MAKER-SPACES/NEXT-LAB/ HTTPS://MSD.UNIMELB.EDU.AU/MAKER-SPACES/NEXT-LAB/ HTTPS://MSD.UNIMELB.EDU.AU/MAKER-SPACES/NEXT-LAB 7
INTRODUCTION FOREWORD JULIE WILLIS ALAN PERT Dean Director, Melbourne School of Design Welcome to the Melbourne School of Design for 2021. While Architecture versus Housing we remain in challenging times, and campus-based study may A critical role of design is to imagine and create alternative not be an option for you just yet, the spirit of who we are and worlds with inventions, products, services, environments, what we do at the MSD is still very much in place. We aim for a materials and processes that respond to current issues and dynamic and vibrant environment in which ideas and innovation improve the quality of life for everyone. In 2021, Melbourne thrive, situated within the wider context of a great design- Design Week asks: Which world will we make together when focused city. The MSD provides space for both experimentation we know tomorrow will be very different today? NGV Design and engagement, deeply connected to the multiple professional Week 2021 arenas that shape our built environment. Melbourne School of Design will showcase the winners of The Future Studios, online or face-to-face, are at the heart of the MSD. Homes Design Competition with a digital exhibition during Melbourne The studio is an environment that forms, tests, challenges and Design Week (March 26th – April 5th) and with a physical exhibition rewards; where the best designers and thinkers are forged by in MSD’s Dulux Gallery during April and May 2021. The competition grappling with complex problems in creative and original ways. ran throughout semester 2, 2020 as a partnership between, The As a student with us, not only will you develop your capacity Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP), to conceptualise, represent and express ideas, but also to The Office of the Victorian Government Architect (OVGA) and IBA communicate your propositions to a wide audience. Studio Melbourne. The exhibition will also celebrate the launch of the new projects, problems and opportunities - from the speculative to Social (Housing) Innovation Lab which explores the relationships the most pragmatic real world problems - are designed to test between research knowledge and form by examining and exploring all aspects of housing as the prototype of architectural thinking, your thinking and push you out of your comfort zone. The cycle of planning policy and social innovation. investigation, proposition and critical evaluation is fundamental to the way the studio facilitates our learning. Studio is a place Martin Pawley’s 1971 publication ‘Architecture versus Housing’ where you can flourish in an environment that both supports you explained, that housing is a system - it is an assemblage of different and delights in your success. actors, financial imperatives, policy goals, social conditions, architectural ideologies, planning legislation and construction costs The MSD offers myriad opportunities for you to make the most - in the Post War period it was also a lot to do with population growth, of your engagement with us. Ensure you take advantage of the car ownership, a rejection of the mediaeval city and an optimism these events to see, hear and engage with key practitioners and for all things future orientated! 50-years on the system is well and experts. Draw upon this rich array to fully explore your potential truly broken. We seem to have lost our way in the production of and prepare yourself for future success. We look forward to the built environment - our cities and suburbs are built for profit, seeing you thrive. not for people, and we have a crisis of affordability. The market for new housing is dominated by free-standing tracts on the fringes and real-estate extrusions in the city. There are limited alternatives or innovative models available on the market. Modern architecture’s social mission - the effort to establish a decent standard of living for all - seems a thing of the past. Architecture is now a tool of capital, complicit in a purpose antithetical to its erstwhile ideological endeavour. Reinier De Graaf, Architectural Review, 24 April 2015 Architectural historian Charles Jencks once cited the televised demolition of Pruitt-Igoe in 1972 as the moment “modern architecture died”. The racially segregated, middle-class complex of thirty-three, eleven-storey towers, opened to great fanfare on the north side of St Louis between 1954 and 1956. But within a decade, it would become a decrepit warehouse exclusively inhabited by poor, black residents. Within two decades, it would undergo complete demolition. Pruitt- Igoe’s obsolescence would trigger a wave of similar spectator sport demolitions across the globe, prompted by many public housing estates failing to express the social and individual needs of the occupants, with disastrous results. Whether you call Pruitt-Igoe’s short, troubled existence a failure of architecture, a failure of policy, or a failure of society, its fate remains bound up with, and reflective of, the fate of many cities in the mid-20th century. When Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews announced on Saturday 4th July, that three thousand people living in nine public housing towers in Melbourne would been placed under the harshest lockdown rules of the coronavirus pandemic in Australia so far, the ongoing tensions that have dogged public housing estates around the world over the last 70-years suddenly resurfaced in our minds. Dr Tony Bartone, AMA president, described the towers as “vertical cruise ships”, comparing them with the explosive spread that happened on a number of cruise ships in the early days of the virus. Daniel Andrews went on to describe the residents living in these flats as among the 8
INTRODUCTION Martha Rosler, Housing Is a Human Right, Time Square Spectacolor animation detail, 1989 most vulnerable and heavily policed people in the state of Victoria, The troubled existence of these estates around the world are with a high population of new migrants, Indigenous people, reflective of the complexity and contradictions of the housing people experiencing severe mental illness and people who have system in each nation. For example, a comparative study of social experienced family violence or homelessness. Minister for Housing, housing programs across the globe, would suggest, that they vary Richard Wynne, said people living in these public housing estates substantially — in their histories of origin, who they serve, where were “some of the most vulnerable people in our community” and housing is located, the means of financing new housing, and even Health authorities said the drastic move was necessary because of how their housing subsidies work. What is similar though is the the nature of the buildings, where many people live in close quarters generic architectural forms. The physical nature of the housing stock and use shared facilities including lifts and laundries. In other words, seen in the images of Flemington and North Melbourne circulating residents find themselves in the position where their health is across media platforms could have been from Chicago, Glasgow (a primarily a product of their environment. quarter of Glasgow’s high-rises have been demolished in less than 10 years), London, Paris, Toronto or any number of eastern European Richard Wynne who also grew up in the community around the cities that adopted the tower as a way of replacing post-war inner- North Melbourne Public Housing Estate, then put these nine city slums. towers in context when he made reference to all forty-seven high- rise public housing towers across metropolitan Melbourne. These Since the late 1970’s, the initiative to construct the city are the most visible legacy of the Housing Commission of Victorian has been left to the private sector. The financialisation Commission, and the Commonwealth Government’s Nation Building of our housing stock has created a peculiar lens through program, which provided tens of thousands of houses and flats which politicians, planners and the private sector regard in Melbourne and many country towns between the late 1940s and the structure of our cities. Housing became a commodity, the early 70s, providing low rent housing for low income families. All and cities, became eviscerated and stratified by wealth, built using the same pre-cast concrete panel technology these Public class and race. The conservative revolution that first Housing Estates remain a powerful symbol of the social, racial and sweeps America and later Europe, in the 70’s, forced architectural tensions that have dogged our cities in the mid-20th an agenda of economic liberalisation and the slashing century. 9
INTRODUCTION of government spending. The size of the public sector to enable different population groups to participate; and nobody gradually reduced and large public housing projects should be able to guess a person’s social status or income level based become a thing of the past. This period essentially and on their home address”. In a nutshell; the focus is on the dignity and concurrently marks the end of an unfettered belief in the security of the people and the health of Vienna’s citizens”. IBA Vienna merits of modern architecture or wholesale urban visions. recognises that, each social need which receives no answers creates Large sections of society moved from being tenants in the a health problem and each health problem which remains without post-war years to become home-owners and mortgages appropriate answers creates a social problem. locked society into an inescapable financial reality. Reinier De Graaf, Architectural Review, 24 April 2015 After the conservative revolution, the built environment and particularly housing acquired a fundamentally Now after 50-years of inaction in Victoria, the need to reframe new role. From a means to provide shelter, it becomes priorities across the board, in funding, procurement, design and a means to generate financial returns. A building is no delivery of social and affordable housing could finally be getting the longer something to use, but to own (with the hope of urgent attention it deserves. increased asset-value, rather than use-value, over time). Through the general deployment of the term ‘real estate’, Minister Wynne’s announcement about the $5.4b “Big Housing the definition of the architect is replaced by that of the Build” (15th Nov 2020) is an opportunity to stop finger pointing and economist. This is also the moment that architecture instead implement a progressive social agenda for housing that becomes definitively inexplicable (at least in line with redefines housing from a consumer product to an important public the criteria according to which architects usually explain infrastructure; with a human touch. Affordable housing has been the architecture). The logic of a building no longer primarily problem child perpetually tugging at the sleeve of the Minister since reflects its intended use but instead serves mostly to he took on the role of Planning Minister in 2014. The tugging only promote a ‘generic’ desirability in economic terms. intensified when ‘Housing’ was added to his portfolio in 2018. While, Judgement of architecture is deferred to the market. The the announcement was as much about creating jobs as it was about ‘architectural style’ of buildings no longer conveys an tackling the corrosive effects of social inequality the optimist in all ideological choice but a commercial one: architecture is of us welcomes the opportunity to recalibrate Melbourne’s chronic worth whatever others are willing to pay for it. Reinier De housing crisis; While the shortfall in numbers has to be a priority Graaf, Architectural Review, 24 April 2015 it cannot be simply a numbers game; it has to be a socio-spatial agenda that is about quality and community. With a new political environment, there is now an opportunity to drive and implement a progressive social agenda for housing in As architect, Neave Brown once said about housing, “We have to face Victoria. With the new agency, we can redefine standards, finances, it as a social problem, not as an economic problem for neoliberalism occupation, land use, acquisition and so much more. By adopting to make money out of. And if we go on doing that, we are going into the model of an International Building Exhibition (IBA) we have the a future of catastrophe with our eyes wide open.” We also have to opportunity to consider our 12,000 new homes as part of particular move away from a fixation on traditional family stereotypes and instrument of urban development. IBA’s serve as spaces for begin to consider the complexity of lifestyle choices in the future. experimentation, as urban development labs and prototypes for new The realities of life have changed. Quality of life is so much more ways of living. IBA’s should be understood as temporary laboratories, than minimum standards and square metres. Residential buildings as areas of both spatial and intellectual experimentation which would constructed in the 1950’s and 60’s were almost exclusively conceived seem critical for Homes Victoria whose objective it is to generate for small families, while models of living together are more diverse internationally effective contributions to New Social Housing - we nowadays. Take Denmark for instance, where there are currently 37 need to avoid pursuing a course of business as usual, so that we will different types of families registered by the government: An ever- not one day find ourselves faced yet again with the ruins of social growing group of one-person households, flat-sharing communities, housing and the spectacle of demolishing estates. life-partnerships and communities with and without children from current and previous relationships, long distance and weekend As Reinier De Graaf, suggests, “the 20th century taught us that relationships and many other ways of living have emerged. The utopian thinking can have precarious consequences”, but, if the nuclear family made up of parents and their children is only one course of history is dialectic, the question for the new protagonists model out of many. This alone calls for rethinking how we design (students, architects, planners, researchers, developers, community housing. This calls for radical changes in the way we build and live, housing providers, politicians & policy makers), is what follows? considering aspects of geography, identity, demography, and local communities. In a post-pandemic context; work, leisure and education are also increasingly merging with housing. Spatial separation by functional categories are being replaced by ‘living’ as a whole. The world of work is no longer dictated by the 9am-5pm patterns of behaviour. Working at the “home-office” has become normalised and the digital age has altered our life and opened up new flexible opportunities, where boundaries are difficult to fix. Leisure and work are spatially exchangeable. Housing for too long has been defined by static ideas about; rooms (one, two and three bedrooms) and by standards, Prof. Alan Pert is Director of MSD, Chair of IBA Melbourne and rules and programs. The results are house types that have remained Research Director of The Hallmark Research Initiative for Affordable unchanged and unchallenged for many years. Housing. The Big Housing Build aims to create over 12,000 homes in four years. Of these, 9,300 are estimated to be social housing. The rest will IBA Melbourne was established as a unique collaboration across be affordable or market-rate housing and the program will replace five of Melbourne’s built environment schools, who are committed to 1,100 old public housing units. The program comes with a new tackling the challenges and opportunities presented by Melbourne’s government agency, Homes Victoria, and the promise of a ten-year growth and lack of affordable housing options. In Semester 2, 2020, policy and funding framework. Maybe Homes Victoria, could adopt IBA Melbourne partnered with the Office of the Victorian Government the principle of IBA Vienna 2016 - 2022, which states that “each and Architect (OVGA) and The Department of Environment Land Water & every Viennese resident is to be able to benefit from the fundamental Planning (DELWP) on the delivery of the student iteration of the ‘Future right to an affordable home; with a view to successfully living in the Homes’ design competition. An exhibition of the winning entries will be community, manifold and suitable measures are to be developed presented at MSD as part of Melbourne Design Week 2021. 10
INTRODUCTION Glasgow’s Red Road flats demolished on October 11 2015 11
WE’RE BACK! • IN PERSON COLLECTION OR HOME DELIVERY AVAILABLE • LASER CUTTING, HP (NYLON) + RESIN (SLA) 3D PRINTING ELIGIBLE FOR DELIVERY • IN PERSON + ONLINE CONSULTATIONS AVAILABLE MSD.UNIMELB.EDU.AU/MAKER-SPACES/FABLAB 12
CARVE OUT SOME TIME TO COMPLETE YOUR INDUCTIONS FOR WORKSHOP ACCESS. OPEN ACCESS 1:00-4:30PM, MONDAY - FRIDAY. VISIT OUR WEBSITE FOR LASTEST INFORMATION. MSD.UNIMELB.EDU.AU/MAKER-SPACES/MACHINE-WORKSHOP 13
MSD STUDIO DAYS AND TIMES Correct at the time of printing. Please check the handbook prior to classes. MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO A STUDIO TITLE LEADER TIME Master of Architecture Studio A Laura Martires and Marijke Davey Mondays 18:15-21:15, Thursdays 18:15-21:15. Omline MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE CDE STUDIO TITLE LEADER TIME VERTICALISING. High rise schools... Studio 01 Isabel Lasala Mondays 09:00-12:00, Thursdays 09:00-12:00 a new architectural type? Studio 02 HACKNEY Rennie Liffen and Oskar Kazmanli-Liffen Mondays 13:00-16:00, Thursdays 17:00-20:00 Studio 03 Eternal Holiday Peter Stasios Mondays 18:15-21:15, Thursdays 18:15-21:15 HOPE IN PETURBANISM_ Studio 05 Professor Justyna Karakiewicz Wednesdays 09:00-15:00 Great Ocean [Road?] Jim Stewart, Katie Skillington and Adam Studio 06 What’s Next Mondays 13:00-16:00, Wednesdays 18:15-21:15 Murray Studio 07 NoVacancy Gumji Kang and Javier López-Menchero Mondays 17:30-20:30, Thursdays 15:00-18:00 Studio 09 Duplex Studio Kate Finning and Andrew Power Tuesdays 13:00-16:00, Fridays 13:00-16:00 Studio 10 H2O David Mah and Leire Asensio-Villoria Mondays 15:15-18:15, Thursdays 15:15-18:15 The Third Digital Turn of Non- Studio 11 Melika Aljukic Tuesday 15:15-18:15 and Thursday 15:15-18:15 Standard Architecture Studio 13 Embody Hella Wigge Tuesdays 17:00-20:00, Fridays 17:00-20:00 Teaching begins 30/3. Tuesdays 17:00-20:00, Fridays 17:00- Studio 15 Machining Aesthetics V5.0 Dr Paul Loh and David Leggett 20:00, Intensive week Wednesday 7/4 - Saturday 10/4 10:00-17:00, Saturdays 8/5 and 15/5 14:00-17:00 Studio 16 Creative House Joel Benichou Mondays 15:15-18:15, Thursdays 15:15-18:15 Studio 18 LikeHumans Darcy Zelenko and Danny Ngo: Tuesdays 17:00-20:00, Fridays 17:00-20:00 Studio 19 VR - Virtual Reality Ben Waters Mondays 18:15-21:15, Thursdays 09:00-12:00 Permanent Vacation: Studio 21 Dr Toby Reed Mondays 17:00-20:00, Thursdays 17:00-20:00– Rethinking Aged Care Studio 30 Capriccio, Folly, City Kim Võ and Richen Jin Mondays 09:00-12:00, Thursdays 09:00-12:00 Studio 23 Digital Natives Mal Bas, Tisha Lee and Ian Davidson Mondays 15:15-18:15, Thursdays 17:00-20:00 Studio 26 Housing Home and Content(s) Colby Vexler and Pricilla Heung Mondays 17:00-20:00, Thursdays 18:15-21:15 Studio 27 CONNECT Kristen Wang Wednesdays 18:15-21:15, Fridays 13:00-16:00 Studio 28 With/In Antarctic Extremes Dr Miranda Nieboer Tuesdays 14:30-17:30, Fridays 14:30-17:30 Studio 31 Obstinate Persistence Andre Bonnice Tuesdays 17:00-20:00, Fridays 09:00-12:00 Studio 32 NHG. New Hamilton Gallery Simona Falvo and Dayne Trower Mondays 17:00-20:00, Thursdays 17:00-20:00 Studio 33 Studio Japan 2021 Mitchell Eaton and Nancy (Yao) Ji Mondays 12:30-14:30, Thursdays 13:00-17:00 Studio 36 NGV_C Anna Nervegna Mondays 13:00-16:00, Thursdays 13:00-16:00 Studio 40 Out of Date! Dr Dominik Holzer Mondays 17:00-20:00, Thursdays 13:00-16:00 Studio 41 Create | Curate: Sensory (Re)Treat Yui Uchimura Tuesdays 13:00-16:00, 17:00-20:00 Studio 42 RE:IMAGINE Matthieu Bégoghina 19:15-21:15 Mondays, Wednesdays and Thursdays Studio 44 Ultimate Spinach Danielle Peck and Samuel Hunter Mondays 17:00-20:00, Fridays 13:00-16:00 Resonate: Architecture, Arts and Studio 45 Dr Sofia Colabella and Michael Mack Mondays 17:00-20:00, Thursdays 17:00-20:00 Acoustics 14
Correct at the time of printing. Please check the handbook prior to classes. MSD STUDIO DAYS AND TIMES MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE THESIS STUDIO TITLE LEADER TIME/VENUE Professor Anoma Pieris and Studio 01 Centre for Creative Peacemaking Mondays 13:00-16:00, Tuesdays 13:00-16:00 Athanasios Tsakonas Studio 02 The Art of Memory Dr Rory Hyde and Sir Jonathon Mills Tuesdays 09:00-12:00, Thursdays 09:00-12:00 Studio 03 Inland (public) Virginia Mannering Mondays 13:00-16:00, Thursdays 13:00-16:00 Studio 04 Inland: Housing Ursula Chandler Mondays 09:00-12:00, Thursdays 17:00-20:00 Studio 05 Total Yvonne Meng Mondays 18:15-21:15, Thursdays 18:15-21:15 Heather Mitcheltree and Mitchell Studio 06 Forms of Enchantment Mondays 18:15-21:15, Thursdays 18:15-21:15 Ransome Studio 07 The Body Keeps The Score Anthony Clarke Mondays 13:00-16:00, Wednesdays 13:00-16:00 Studio 08 2070 Benjamin Lau Thursdays 15:15-18:15, Fridays 09:00-12:00 Studio 09 Designing for Neurodiversity Dr Andrew Martel and Dr Kirsten Day Mondays 09:00-12:00, Fridays 09:00-12:00 Studio 10 It will not be over until we talk Marijke Davey Mondays 09:00-12:00, Thursdays 13:00-16:00 Independent Thesis Dr Rory Hyde MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE STUDIO TITLE LEADER TIME/VENUE Mondays 16:15-19:15, Wednesdays 16:15-19:15; Mondays Landscape Studio 01: Design Techniques Wendy Walls 17:00-20:00, Wednesdays 18:15-21:15 | Lecture Mondays 10:00-12:00 Pattern Potentials: bridging utility and Associate Professor Mondays 12:00-15:00, 15:15-18:15 | Lecture Mondays aesthetics Jillian Walliss 11:00-12:00 Landscape Studio 03: Speculations Albert Park’s Fitzroy Street Precinct: Associate Professor Mondays 12:00-15:00, 15:15-18:15 | Lecture Mondays Coordinator: Associate displacement and intersection Andrew Saniga 11:00-12:00 Professor Jillian Walliss Dr Alessandro Liuti Mondays 15:15-18:15, Wednesdays 15:15-18:15 | Lecture Proxemic Materialities and David Wyld Mondays 11:00-12:00 Tuesdays 15:15-18:15, Thursdays 18:15-20:15 | Lecture Re-imagining the concrete lawn as a wetland Professor Ray Green Thursdays 15:15-16:15 Landscape Studio 05: Sustainable Urbanism Enterprize Park: Provocative gestures towards Tuesdays 15:15-18:15, Thursdays 18:15-20:15 | Lecture Dr Anna Hooper Coordinator: Professor reconciliation Thursdays 15:15-16:15 Ray Green Tuesdays 18:15-18:15, Thursdays 18:15-20:15 | Lecture Forging a fairway forward Madhu Lakshmanan Thursdays 15:15-16:15 Landscape Thesis Coordinator: Dr Sidh Thesis Dr Sidh Sintusingha Wednesdays 14:15-20:15, Thursdays 12:15-18:15 Sintusingha Professor Alex Felson Tuesdays 15:00-18:00, Thursdays 15:00-18:00 | Lecture ABPL90430 Designing with Country : Resilience Studio and Jefa Greenaway Tuesdays 14:00-15:00 MASTER OF URBAN DESIGN STUDIO TITLE LEADER TIME/VENUE A Studio A Leire Asensio-Villoria Mondays 09:00-12:00, Thursdays 09:00-12:00 HOPE IN PETURBANISM_ C Justyna Karakiewicz Wednesdays 09:00-15:00 Great Ocean [Road?] Thesis H2O David Mah and Leire Asensio-Villoria Mondays 15:15-18:15, Thursdays 15:15-18:15 MASTER OF URBAN PLANNING STUDIO TITLE LEADER TIME/VENUE MUP Studio I: Urban informality in Global Dr Redento B. Recio and Coordinator: Thursdays 12:00-18:00 North Cities Tanzil Shafique Dr Crystal Legacy 15
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO A STUDIO A Laura Martires and Marijke Davey: ‘a’ is for Architecture 16
A MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO A LAURA MARTIRES AND MARIJKE DAVEY ‘a’ is for Architecture There are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older measure fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says, “Morning, boys. How’s the water?” And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes “What the hell is water?” David Foster Wallace, Excerpt from the speech“This is Water” This is Architecture; an introduction to architectural tools, process and methods. People often say to architects something along the lines of, oh, you’re an architect? I don’t know anything about architecture. This, of course, is false. Almost everyone in the modern world has spent their lives surrounded by architecture—tugging on its door handles, gazing through its windows, bemoaning its shotty construction when the roof leaks or the cold outside seeps through the walls. We are all lifetime owner/operators of architecture and we know lots about it. Or take for example cooking; just because you are not a chef, it does not mean you don’t know anything about food or cooking. So what then defines the difference between the home cook translate and the chef? It lies in the time taken to re-learn how to chop an onion, properly. Rigour, understanding, discipline, technical excellence, dexterity, control, a mission, a vision—a wealth of tools, methodologies and conceptual understanding that gives the chef mastery over a discipline and the choice to cook with purpose. It is much the same with architecture. It is firstly a new way of seeing what has been around you all the time. A diciplined way of, noticing, measuring, understanding, and looking with a critical eye at the day-to-day fabric that frames our lives. In this studio, students will be introduced to architectural thinking, tools and methods. Rather than providing a single path, this course is taught in a series of three vignettes, each encompassing a different methodology for operating as a designer and problem solver. Tutors: Laura Mártires Marijke Davey Studio times: Mondays/ Thursdays Time + Location TBC Lectures: negotiate17 Mondays Time + Location TBC
PROF. DONALD L. BATES Chair of Architectural Design Associate Dean (Engagement) CDE DESIGN STUDIOS SEMESTER 1_2021 Architecture: “In Sickness and in Health” Have you ever been healthy? I mean, truly ‘healthy’? Fully without All those who have written on the subject are filled with disease or illness? prejudice. Before searching out and examining the mechanism of causes of disease, they treat of ‘disease as such’, condemn We operate with a sense of definition and certainty about our body it as an exceptional and harmful condition, and start out and its physiology as defined by a condition of health, against which by detailing the thousand and one ways of combating it, other moments are composed of ‘less-than-health’ or illness. disturbing it, destroying it; they define health, for this purpose, as a ‘normal’ condition that is absolute and And yet, can we really ever say we have been “healthy”? Truly immutable. healthy? Diseases ARE. We do not make or unmake them at will. We are At each moment, when you think back about your health, about that not their masters. They make us, they form us. They may even defining condition of everything being intact, correct, without fault, have created us. They belong to this state of activity which without sickness, illness, injury, or ailment… When was that moment we call life. They may be its main activity. They are one of the in your life when you didn’t – for all the apparent good health that many manifestations of universal matter. They may be the you were in – also have a small sore on your foot; a sensitive and ever principal manifestation of that matter which we will never be so slightly painful inflammation on your tongue; an itchy and barely able to study except through the phenomena of relationships visible rash on the underside of your arm; a cuticle that had been and analogies. Diseases are a transitory, intermediary, pulled/cut and was now faintly tender to the touch and showing future state of health. It may be that they are health itself. traces of the blood that emerged when you tried to pull the skin back? Coming to a diagnosis is, in a way, casting a physiological horoscope. In effect, when was there ever – in any form or condition or moment … – not something less than perfect about your apparent health? Not something that was less than optimal within your state of existence? Epidemics, and even more diseases of the will or collective neuroses, mark off the different epochs of human evolution, It would seem in such a condition, the very concept and sensibility just as tellurian cataclysms mark the history of our planet.” of the ‘healthy’ body is made up of partial moments and partial experiences of health that composite to form the whole of an The emphasis and highlighting are mine, but the sentiment and critical apparently ‘healthy’ body. This is to say, that the measure by position of Cendrars allows me to understand that the very notion which we use to define “in sickness and in health” is in fact always of health and the healthy body, the healthy city, is a constructed, and forever a condition of only continual sickness and apparent assembled condition that we only experience as a pastiche. health. We have never been healthy – and yet we judge our constant condition against the register of something that is a constant state of [It is worth noting that Blaise Cendrars and Le Corbusier not-quite-healthy. were both born in the same neighbourhood of La Chaux- de-Fonds, Switzerland, 36 days apart] Blaise Cendrars, the French novelist and poet in the lineage of Rimbaud, wrote a fascinating, and complex text, emanating from his Another French writer, Albert Camus, writing not of France but of experiences of World War I and the historic flu pandemic of 1918. In Algeria, set his novel The Plague (La Peste) in the city of Oran, in the Moravagine, Cendrars writes: context and circumstance of an infectious epidemic in this North African city. With Camus, we are forcefully reminded of our own pandemic “As a special branch of general philosophy, pathogenesis circumstances and “rings of steel” as urban definitions; “closed had never been explored. In my opinion it had never been borders” as political identities and the intimacy of “social distancing”. approached in a strictly scientific fashion--that is to say, In the case of Camus, the plague is localised and the restrictions on objectively, amorally, intellectually. movement (not far from our own “lock-downs”) set Oran apart from all other cities and villages as an act of quarantine. This profound return 18
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE CDE STUDIOS to the defence of city walls, is not in control of what is to be kept out, Modern architecture and the image of Modern architecture are both but of what cannot be allowed to leave – our very contemporaneous enlightening and they provoke an “of course” moment upon witnessing experience of Stage Three restrictions. Colomina’s thorough elucidation of her topic. The Plague is a novel set in an epidemic. We, on the other hand, Yet the most provocative, the most ‘needle-to-the-heart’ moment have experienced and continue to experience the condition of a comes from her declaration that it is the question of health and the pandemic – a global, simultaneous infection, that within weeks (and medical environment that not only ‘influence’ Modern architecture, certainly a few months) had infected and impacted all continents, even but that Modern architecture is nothing if not the consequence of eventually, Antarctica. As a “pandemic” [pan + demos = all + people], health and its sterilisation of space. Colomina: we soon found ourselves fully globalised - not as part of an economic and/or political agenda (though economic and political forces are fully “That’s the central thesis of the book — Modern architecture implicated in this pandemic) – but profoundly as a world in which we has more to do with the campaign for health than with were all dealing with a contagious interruption at the same time and anything else.” more or less to the same extent. This “world event” – an event not just happening on the world – but an event that for all its nuances and “The ‘visual hygiene’ of modern architecture was not the differences is particularly impactful in that no one is immune, and no symbol of an eradication of history, as it had been described country can prevent its arrival. It is a comprehensive, simultaneous by other theorists, but rather simply that of germs and and ubiquitous disruption. paranoia.” In Book One, Chapter One of De Architectura, Vitruvius defines the There will be many questions asked of architecture as to how it will educational prerequisites of an architect and includes within the respond to COVID-19 and our post-pandemic world. Most of the broad, comprehensive knowledge framework, the advice that an responses will be superficial and out-of-date before they are even architect should have an understanding and familiarity with medicine. implemented. But the question of what is our “health” and how do The health of a city, the health of a house, the health of a populace we accommodate a world where the germs, bacteria and viruses that are all tied to knowledge of the hygiene of a site, climatic impacts, we have often perceived as threats to our lives, are also always part water supply and ventilation. This apparently simple and practical list of what it is to be human and to in fact be able to live. This should of knowledge parameters for architectural practice (along with some allow us to keep questioning of how we move forward in sickness and many others) is only more striking when compared to what today in health, through Architecture is considered the appropriate education of an architect (based on restricted accreditation constraints) and the increasingly limited role [a link to the DLS_ Beatriz Colomina: that contemporary architects play in the built environment “X-Ray Architecture” can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/ In 2019, as one of the invited guests for our Dean’s Lecture Series, watch?v=0EcbsttGmr0&list=PLgGN9A- Professor Beatriz Colomina spent four days with MSD, delivering the SZN9k8fjWCDQoeCP81EF5ut2XZ&index=4] main DLS lecture, as well as numerous conversations and discussions with students, faculty and teaching staff, and participating in a range of events across Melbourne. Of particular interest in respect to the focus of this text and our on-going accommodation of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was more than prescient that Prof Colomina’s primary lecture centred around her newest book, X-Ray Architecture. The medical imagery of an x-ray scan and the link Colomina addresses between architecture and medicine, between health and the city, between cleanliness, abstract and sterile (real and implied) spaces, between white, purity and disinfection, between air, openness and the body, all these references, linkages and direct relationships with 19
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE CDE CDE STUDIO ALLOCATION CDE STUDIOS SCHEDULE FEBRUARY Studio Presentation Day will take place on CDE Studio Presentations 25 Thursday 25 February from 10:00 - 15:30 in 10:00 start the Glyn Davis Building (MSD), Theatre B117. Balloting for CDE Studios begins 15:00 25 27 During this day all studio leaders will present their studios and will also be available to Balloting for CDE Studios ends 9:00 answer questions outside the lecture theatre immediately after their presentation. The MARCH WEEK presentation day will be recorded and made Semester 1 starts 01 01 available to students. Information about 08 the studios available this semester is also 02 on the MSD Studio website (https://msd. 03 15 unimelb.edu.au/current-students/subject- information/msd-studios/architecture- 22 studio-c-d-and-e). 04 You will be required to submit your studio From preferences via an online form available Melbourne Design Week: GLYN DAVIS BUILDING (MSD) 24 through Canvas. This will be open for 48 hours from: 15:00 on Thursday 25 February 05 29 until 9:00 on Saturday 27 February. Late submissions will not be accepted. APRIL 02 - 11 You will be required to select 12 UNIQUE Easter Non-Teaching Period studio preferences via the online form, and you must only complete the online 12 - 18 19 26 nomination form once. Please ensure you CDE MID-SEMESTER REVIEWS 06 read and follow the instructions on the nomination form; any invalid entries may affect your final studio allocation. 07 Over the weekend (27 - 28 February), you will 08 be allocated to a studio, and a final list of allocated studios will be posted on Canvas on MAY Sunday 28 February. Studios will commence from Monday 01 March so please ensure you 03 09 check the LMS so you know to which studio you have been allocated. 10 10 Please note, you are NOT guaranteed your first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, or 11 17 seventh preferences in the nomination. We will try to provide as close to your 12 24 premier preferences as possible, but there is no guarantee for this, even for Studio E, Semester 1 ends 30 Studio D or Studio C students. The current COVID-19 pandemic has added additional 31 - 04 uncertainties to the process of allocation of SWOT Vac studios, for which we do not yet know the full JUNE consequences. We urge you to select eight studios that will best suit your interests and CDE SUBMISSION OF FINAL PROJECTS 06 aspirations and ensure that all eight studios ON CANVAS Deadline 23:59 are offered at times you can attend. 07 - 13 Be reminded that the criteria for studio CDE END OF SEMESTER REVIEWS allocation must consider the following: preferences; gender balance; local and international student balance; higher and Queen’s Birthday: Monday (University Holiday) 14 lower WAM balance; balance between Moderation 14 students’ previous studio allocation; and a balance between Studio C, D, E students per studio. MSDx Exhibition opening night 24 Exhibition continues to 10 July End of Exam Period 25 20
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE CDE STUDIOS COORDINATOR: DONALD BATES | SENIOR TUTOR: KRISTEN WANG CDE STUDIOS: SEMESTER 1 2021 Page 22 STUDIO 01 Isabel Lasala: VERTICALISING. High rise schools...a new architectural type? Page 23 STUDIO 02 Rennie Liffen and Oskar Kazmanli-Liffen: HACKNEY Studio C NSCA Options Page 24 STUDIO 03 Peter Stasios: Eternal Holiday Page 25 STUDIO 05 Justyna Karakiewicz: Hope In Peturbanism_ Great Ocean [Road?] Fully online Page 26 STUDIO 06 Jim Stewart, Katie Skillington and Adam Murray: What’s Next Page 27 STUDIO 07 Gumji Kang and Javier López-Menchero: NoVacancy Fully Page 28 STUDIO 09 Kate Finning and Andrew Power: Duplex Studio face-to-face Page 29 STUDIO 10 David Syn Chee Mah and Leire Asensio Villoria: H2O Page 30 STUDIO 11 Melika Aljukic: The Third Digital Turn of Non-Standard Architecture Page 31 STUDIO 13 Hella Wigge: Embody Page 32 STUDIO 15 Paul Loh and David Leggett: Machining Aesthetics V5.0 Page 33 STUDIO 16 Joel Benichou: Creative House Page 34 STUDIO 18 Darcy Zelenko and Danny Ngo: LikeHumans Page 35 STUDIO 19 Ben Waters: VE – Virtual Environments Page 36 STUDIO 21 Toby Reed: Permanent Vacation: Rethinking Aged Care Page 37 STUDIO 22 Kim Võ and Richen Jin: Capriccio, Folly, City Page 38 STUDIO 23 Mal Bas, Tisha Lee and Ian Davidson: Digital Natives Colby Vexler and Pricilla Heung: Housing, Home and Contents: A Soft Focus on Page 39 STUDIO 26 Domestic Things Page 40 STUDIO 27 Kristen Wang and Cox Architecture: CONNECT Page 41 STUDIO 28 Miranda Nieboer: With/In Antarctic Extremes Page 42 STUDIO 31 Andre Bonnice: Obstinate Persistence Page 43 STUDIO 32 Simona Falvo and Dayne Trower: NHG. New Hamilton Gallery Page 44 STUDIO 33 Mitchell Eaton and Nancy (Yao) Ji: Studio Japan 2021 Page 45 STUDIO 36 Anna Nervegna: NGV_C. National Gallery of Victoria Contemporary Page 46 STUDIO 40 Dominik Holzer: Out of Date! Page 47 STUDIO 41 Yui Uchimura: Create | Curate: Sensory (Re)Treat Page 48 STUDIO 42 Matthieu Bégoghina: RE:IMAGINE Page 49 STUDIO 44 Danielle Peck and Sam Hunter: Ultimate Spinach Page 50 STUDIO 45 Sofia Colabella and Michael Mack: Resonate: Architecture, Arts and Acoustics 21
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO CDE 01 ISABEL LASALA VERTICALISING High-rise schools... a new architectural type? The exponential growth that is currently undergoing in Australia's major cities has brought significant changes in urban programs and activities. Primary and secondary schools don’t escape this situation. As the key buildings in the urban fabric of most communit ies, schools are experiencing significant changes, in particular as the population is growing at speed, and the land available is scarce and expensiv e. As a way to deal with this new condition, the Australian Government has started to “think about education vertically." This translates into seven vertical schools currently being built, all in the most populated areas of our major cities. This situation presents us with an opportunity to explore new forms of spatial organisation, and propose different formal and spatial configurations that might eventuate into a new type of building. This studio thus seeks to explore these new design challenges, and provide students with the opportunity to re- think primary and secondary schools. A key challenge to address is to re-organis e a program that normally requires a considerable plan size. Students will have the opportunity to formulate their own conceptualization of what a contemporary vertical school might be, and in particular challenging the boundaries between interior and exterior space. The studio also asks students to implement a specific design strategy, based on challenging the disciplinary boundaries that exist between architecture and landscape architecture. With this, it is expected that students will explore with the untapped relationships that exist between these two apparently different disciplines. The intention is to offer students with the opportunity to create the singular spatial experiences and atmospheres that can be produced by the ambiguous spatialit y that emerges from their combination. The project’s site will be located in Prahran, at the corner between Malvern Road and Little Chapel St. The design process will be undertaken through three main methods that complement each other, which include observation, case study methodology, and design exploration. This project has to be represented employing a wide range of different tools of architectural communic ation, i.e. physical and digital models, drawings, and images, etc. 22
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO CDE 02 RENNIE LIFFEN AND OSKAR KAZMANLI-LIFFEN RITUALS OF REPAIR I walk to you after school along that rolling A-road. Turkish kebab shop after Car repair shop after Japanese supermarket. Summer stretching between me and that moment. 6 days a week I’ll VZHHS WKDW ÀRRU $ GD\¶V VDZGXVW D OLIH¶V ZRUN ,PSOHPHQWV LQ IDPLOLHV RQ WKH ZDOO RU ¿OHG DZD\ in drawers waiting for tomorrow. Close the door behind us and you tell me this merchant town is lit up just for us. Like dreaming with eyes open we corral a grandeur that would never be ours. What everyone wants now is beyond perfection. Brand. New. Satisfaction collapsing between you and that moment. Watch enough unboxing videos and you’ll see what I mean. Peel back the SODVWLF 7R \RX , JLYH WKH ¿UVW WRXFK 7KDW¶V ZKDW \RXERXJKWWKHOLJKWRQP\IDFHDV,OLHKHUH2QD VKHOILQDGUDZHURULQ\RXUSRFNHWLVQRWWKURZLQJ something out. Throwing something out is the act of dropping something. It falls. You let it go. Hold on Hackney Studio 2 continues to investigate ‘the form of ritual’ in architecture by exploring intimate and idiosyncratic projects that reveal the human dimensions of contemporary life. The poetic architectural potentials of rituals, routines and occupations of buildings and spaces are at the forefront of the VWXGLR¶VLQWHUHVWVDQGWKHUH¿QHPHQWRIWKHVHDFURVV the minutes, days, seasons and lifetimes of selected communities underpins the work of the studio. The studio promotes sensitivity and humility in architectural thought and process, but also seeks opportunities within projects to explore empowerment and social equality. Context provides this opportunity and is perceived as something beyond the physical, where narrative and imagination DUH WKH VXUYH\RUV RI WKH LQWULFDWH GHWDLO RI ¿FWLWLRXV places and characterful locations, creating a unique, provocative and shared setting for projects. HACKNEY 23
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO CDE 03 L HO PETER STASIOS N A LI ETE R DAY ETERNAL HOLIDAY with PETER STASIOS We are not working less; in fact, we are working longer and harder than ever, in spaces that have left us feeling broken. The moral and spiritual damage that comes from this situation is profound. There is a sense we are at the beginning of something, the previous version of the city and work have been made obsolete. Eternal Holiday is keen to explore alternatives. Eternal Holiday orientates itself around the topic of work and its role in the city. With a cal- culated indifference to current forms of work and city making we will be investigating both through a critical lens in hope of negating the status quo. Defined by a number of refusals and denials, students will be tasked with defining a new version of the workplace and pro- posing a new architecture that will restore the city as a creative engine. Using a site in the city the studio will pair the above provocation with distinctly architec- tural problems of scale, form and program. Prioritising important questions over resolved answers, students are expected to develop a conceptual position on work and search for the appropriate accompanying architecture. 24
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO CDE 05 JUSTYNA KARAKIEWICZ HOPE IN PERTURBANISM GREAT OCEAN [ROAD?] This semester we will be looking at the possible futures for the Great Ocean Road. Let’s start by making it clear, this it will not be a problem- solving exercise or a search for solutions. Instead we will try to understand not what we know but rather what we need to know in order to change the status-quo. We will be designing something that will allow something else to happen; this may be something that we cannot predict but that it might improve the environment in which we live. And in order to do this, we will need to abandon our preconception that humans IF YOU WANT IMAGES are constantly under threat from nature, and we need to fight it TO PRINT TO THE EDGE back with design (Colombina & Wigley, 2019). We are not the OF THE PAPER THEY only species worth preserving. NEED TO EXTEND 3MM BEYOND THE PAPER We will also have to forget most of urban theories in which EDGE (EG. INCLUDE deterministic progressions are privileged. In place of these, we will 3MM BLEED) adopt Complex Adaptive System (CAS) theory that postulates that any healthy system requires periodic perturbation (disturbance). In science, perturbation is understood as deviation of a system from its initial state by internal or external stimuli. The external stimuli in urban form can PAPER EDGE be achieved through interventions, but we know that the interventions act on emergent qualities of the system which are unpredictable, by definition they are not foreseen or planned. We will postulate an imaginary emergent moment, perhaps even an object. When this moment is be perceived, it will exert an influence, and this influence will make changes within the context and could lead to another emergence through another perturbation. Our design will be a part of larger systems and cannot be conceived for the benefit of humans only. As humans we exert great influence on resource flows, which in turn create pressures on natural systems. Human activities have profound impacts on the environment, and these cannot be mitigated with superficial strategies such as treating the urban condition as a landscape. There is growing awareness of the mechanisms by which we harm the natural environment, such as through pollutants and waste, but the greater impact of human settlement is a more extensive yet less examined outcome. So why take the Great Ocean Road as a focus? The name itself reflects a culture in which human activity dominates. As the coast is threatened by erosion and rising sea levels, the role of a road demands reconsideration with a reassessment of our value systems and cultural priorities. This thread of asphalt is symptomatic of a crisis, not only for its purpose of connection but also for its priorities. The road is a representation of our conundrums. Extensive evidence calls increasingly for a recognition that urban and natural ecosystems should be considered as continuities, not disjunctures. From the CAS perspective, urban form can be considered as part of the natural system to contribute to a better quality of life for all species, that is, turning our focus from ‘people-centric’ to ‘life-centric’ development for all. If you want to work hard, to experiment, to be brave, to abandon a lot of theories that you previously learn, and do something different and exciting, then this studio is definitely the one for you. This studio is also open to Master of Urban Design students. 25
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO CDE 06 JIM STEWART, KATIE SKILLINGTON AND ADAM MURRAY what's next? a master of architecture c-d-e studio combining environmental sustainability with high-density hybridity In what's next, students are asked to reflect on the challenges facing urban environments as they grow into the 21st Century. Participants will explore threats to our natural, social and cultural systems, and consider how density, intensity and diversity can act as a catalyst for renewal and regeneration. Theoretical critiques of sustainability in dense urban environments will be investigated in parallel with technological ESD solutions, and design-led responses. Students will form their own personal philosophy on ‘what’s next’, and apply this to a hypothetical near-future vision for a mega hybrid building in Melbourne’s CBD. studio 06 - what's next? led by adam murray, jim stewart & katie skillington supported by 26
MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE STUDIO CDE 07 GUMJI KANG AND JAVIER LÓPEZ-MENCHERO NOVACANCY Studio 7 Master of Architecture Melbourne School of Design Cities continue to grow and their inhabitants flow in to fill the gaps of the city. With their vivid memories of bustling warehouses, clouds of smoke coming out of workers’ cottages, and dust settling on the decades of stories buried behind cold plaster walls, buildings carry on. But do buildings grow with the cities? With the explosive growth of population and expansion of the cities, there is continual need to reimagine and redesign the existing city fabrics. The current building can be understood as a set of layers (or layered elements) that attribute information - not only about how a city is operating currently, but about how it was lived in the past. This studio will cover negotiating and adding to these layers rather than replacing them. This studio will be centred around the architectural discourses on heritage, conservation, and contemporary readaptation. Students will be asked to carefully inspect and research an industrial precinct near the Melbourne CBD, at the cusp of change, producing a series of studies to build on their chosen site and program within the precinct. How would you preserve, reimagine and design the buildings to grow with the city? This will be one journey intensely urban, intensely dense, and intensely interventionist. This is NoVacancy. // Gumji Kang // Javier López-Menchero 27
You can also read