Data-driven Priorities for Improving Outcomes for Students with Disabilities - Glenna Gallo Assistant Superintendent, Special Education Office of ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Data-driven Priorities for Improving Outcomes for Students with Disabilities Glenna Gallo Assistant Superintendent, Special Education Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction
Vision: All students prepared for post-secondary pathways, careers, and civic engagement. Mission: Transform K–12 education to a system that is centered on closing opportunity gaps and is characterized by high expectations for all students and educators. We achieve this by developing equity-based policies and supports that empower educators, families, and communities. Values: • Ensuring Equity • Collaboration and Service • Achieving Excellence through Continuous Improvement • Focus on the Whole Child
Equity Statement: Each student, family, and community possesses strengths and cultural knowledge that benefit their peers, educators, and schools. Ensuring educational equity: • Goes beyond equality; it requires education leaders to examine the ways current policies and practices result in disparate outcomes for our students of color, students living in poverty, students receiving special education and English Learner services, students who identify as LGBTQ+, and highly mobile student populations. • Requires education leaders to develop an understanding of historical contexts; engage students, families, and community representatives as partners in decision-making; and actively dismantle systemic barriers, replacing them with policies and practices that ensure all students have access to the instruction and support they need to succeed in our schools.
Today’s Topics Systemic Framework: Golden Circle Start with Why: Mindset Research & Data How to foster change: ESSA & IDEA OSPI Priorities What this means for practice: Graduation Practices IEP Supports December 6, 2018 | 4
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0d/b7/15/0db715b1b2a52cf229ed8bc9f59de056.png Source: Sinek, S. (2009). Start with why: How great leaders inspire everyone to take action. New York: Portfolio. TED Talk: Simon Sinek How great leaders inspire action December 6, 2018 | 5
Data Drives Decisions and Change Efforts • OSPI Special Education is collaborating with our ESD partners to continue discussions around growth mindset and high expectations for all students. • These spring data dives will include updated 2017–18 special education data, including Child Count and Least Restrictive Environment, Assessment and Accountability, Graduation, and Post- School Outcomes, as well as information showcased on the new OSPI Report Card. • Teams will also receive district- and building-level data, to support high-leverage, strategic planning for improving access and outcomes for students with disabilities. December 6, 2018 | 7
Data Dive Schedule 2019 • ESD 105, Yakima – March 20 • ESD 112, Vancouver – April 22 • ESD 113, Tumwater – April 18 • ESD 114, Bremerton – March 21 • ESD 123, Pasco – April 19 • ESD 171, Wenatchee – April 17 • ESD 189, Anacortes – TBD (ESD will take lead) December 6, 2018 | 8
The State of the State of Special Education: • Less than 4% of students in WA are identified as having an intellectual disability. • Upwards of 90% of SWDs present with average to above- average intellectual functioning. • Yet only 56% are placed in general education for 80-100% of the day (For students of color, that total falls to 47%). Source: Annual Performance Report, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, FFY 2016. December 6, 2018 | 9
2017 Percentage of Students with Disabilities by Eligibility, Age 3 – 21 45% 40% 35% 32.7% 30% 25% 20% 18.9% 15.0% 15% 12.3% 10.3% 10% 5% 3.6% 3.5% 2.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.6% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0% Source: Special Education Federal Child Count, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, November 1, 2017. December 6, 2018 | 10
December 6, 2018 | 11
http://www.k12.wa.us/SpecialEd/ResourceLibrary/pubdocs/IEP-Team-Guidelines-Assess.pdf December 6, 2018 | 12
State Graduation Pathways Used by SWDs in 2016-17 60% Math ELA 52.0% 48.9% 50% 40% 28.8% 30% 25.6% 20% 13.8% 14.0% 10% 8.5% 8.4% 0% Reg Assmt & WA-AIM (CIA) Other CIA Options Not Yet Met Other CAA Options Source: Guidance for IEP Teams: Student Participation in Statewide Assessments for Accountability and Graduation, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, 2019. December 6, 2018 | 1313
Post-School Outcomes for All Students with IEPs Source: Center for Change in Transition Services, Seattle University December 6, 2018 | 14
& Accountability 2017-18 English Language Arts 2017-18 Mathematics 80% 80% 69.5% 70% 70% 58.9% 57.5% 60% 55.5% 60% 47.5% 50% 50% 40.6% 40% 40% 25.2% 27.9% 30% 30% 21.0% 20% 14.0% 20% 8.6% 10% 10% 5.3% 0% 0% 3rd 8th 10th 3rd 8th 10th All Students Students with Disabilities All Students Students with Disabilities Source: Assessment Data 2018, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. December 6, 2018 | 15
Source: Batalden, P. & Davidoff, F. (2007). Teaching quality improvement: The devil is in the details. JAMA, 298(9), 1059–1061. the conversations December 6, 2018 | 16
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1L3f5hS8i6E/VQMeyRD1pNI/AAAAAAAACqw/cgNSaCZTMFo/s1200/header.png Stars and wishes Finding your why… What are the stars, or points of light, in these data? Where are some leverage points for change? What are your wishes for access and achievement for students with disabilities? December 6, 2018 | 17
If the ____________ Is Our Why, How Does that Change Our Actions? December 6, 2018 | 18
How do we disrupt WHY? these patterns? HOW? December 6, 2018 | 19
OSPI Priorities: OSPI Priorities Improving Outcomes for Students with Disabilities • Leadership • Growth Mindset • Evidence-based Practices • Professional Development Growth Professional Recruitment • Resource Allocation Mindset Increased expectations of Development Joint training for general & Retention Preparation programs for students with disabilities educators, special educators, administrators, general • RecruitmentLeadership & Retention Evidence- Resource (e.g., standards, instruction, paraeducators, administrators, educators, special educators, graduation, assessments, and parents/families (e.g., IEP related service providers, and Support students with disabilities (including attendance, IEP-related Decisions, and post-school Based team members). Allocation paraeducators focused around instruction and support for increased collaboration and ownership of school outcomes). Practices Braided funding, consolidated grant application, reducing students with disabilities. administrators and staff) and Instruction and interventions costs for administrative tasks, coordinated efforts with within an MTSS framework increasing direct support to community organizations to and inclusionary practices students, and data-based improve results and reduce leading to increased access decision making. disproportionality. and progress in Washington grade-level learning standards. December 6, 2018 | 20
What does the say? Over 80 years of research has shown that placement in the general education setting positively impacts outcomes! Carlberg & Kavale (1980) Wang & Baker (1985) Oh-Young & Filler (2015) Theobald, et al. (2018) 50 research studies Meta-analysis Research studies WA Study on from 1932 – 1970 from 1975 – 1984 from 1980 – 2013 CTE & Outcomes December 6, 2018 | 21
Resources on Evidence-Based Practices • Hattie's 2017 Updated List of Factors Influencing Student Achievement • Achieve the Core Coherence Map • High Leverage Practices in Special Education Image copyright Presenter Media. Used here under purchased license. December 6, 2018 | 22
WHY? So… What can we do? HOW? WHAT? December 6, 2018 | 23
Use the IEP as the Vehicle for Alignment An IEP is a written statement of an educational program developed, reviewed, and revised by an IEP team, and includes… specially designed instruction “to enable the student to be involved in and progress in the general education curriculum…” Image copyright Presenter Media. Used here under purchased license. December 6, 242018 | 24
We All Serve a Role • Parent • Student • General Educator • Special Educator • LEA Representative • Someone to interpret instructional implications of assessments • Other individuals with knowledge or special expertise of the student Who Else Should be at the Table? December 6, 2018 | 25
Capitalize on the General Educator’s Expertise A general education teacher should not only be in attendance at each IEP meeting, but should be an active team member, beyond the IDEA requirement to Content expert for K-12 Learning participate in the review and revision of Standards: the student's IEP and also in the • Determining progress toward attaining annual goals "determination of appropriate positive • Support the student’s involvement behavioral interventions and supports and and progress in the general other strategies, and the determination of education curriculum supplementary aids and services, program • Assist in identifying ways that the student can receive instruction and modifications and support for school participate with nondisabled peers personnel.” • Partner December 6, 2018 | 26
https://crosswalkchurch.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Putting-it-all-Together-copy.jpg Putting it All Together December 6, 2018 | 27
Using Compliance to Improve Outcomes Image copyright Presenter Media. Used here under purchased license.
We Don’t Have Time to Waste Don’t lose sight of the The strength of decision long term impact of making is in the team, with everyone fulfilling their role short term actions Image copyright Presenter Media. Used here under purchased license. December 6, 2018 | 29
The animation automatically begins. Legislative Session 2019 Media and Public Perception Perfect Timing
Increasing access and outcomes… Foster collaboration between general & special education and community partners! Build a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) • Framework of tiered interventions & supports • Data-informed (culturally-responsive!) pre-referral interventions Remember: mindset matters! • Student need (academic, social/emotional, etc.) ≠ disability • All students are capable of achieving with the right supports • Addressing structural inequality must be part of the discussion December11/2018 6, 2018 || 31 31
Questions? Comments? December 6, 2018 | 32
You can also read