CPRM Eleni Marianou, Secretary General - cpmr.org | @CPMR_Europe
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
•Keys to successful lobbying •Types of impact I. CPMR Lobbying •Key successes •Lobbying for CEF 2021-2027 •Current work on TEN-T II. Focus on Transport •Future Plans
I. CPMR LOBBYING
Keys to successful lobbying CPMR at the negotiating CPMR at the right place CPMR unique position table and at the right time CPMR… CPMR… CPMR… • Meets high level EU • Is the first association • Is the only decision makers (e.g to analyse EC association of regions President Juncker Dec proposals of regional constructed on the 2017) relevance basis of sea-basins • Is invited to speak at • Prepared the post- (Geographical European Parliament 2020 period as early Commissions) and Council meetings as 2016 (in house • Only association (e.g informal studies and focusing on EU / non- Cohesion Council questionnaires with EU countries regional meetings) Members) cooperation • Coordinates the • Takes part in EC • Produces unique SEARICA Integroup in Expert Groups (e.g: technical analysis the European Coordinator for parliament Motorways of the Sea)
Types of impact • Early impact on EU policies (e.g: the Brexit Adjustment Reserve) • Legislative impact (amendments on key EP reports) • Influencing EU ‘influencers’ (the CPMR is regularly quoted in the European Parliament Research Service, other think thanks, leading universities…) • Resonance in EU, national and regional media (e.g: Op-ed articles written by CPMR Members) • Long-term impact: changing the picture at European level regarding the role and place of Regions in Europe
Some key successes Safeguarding maritime cross-border cooperation programmes Recognition of Regions within EU climate policies CEF: Core Network Corridors better cover Europe’s peripheries A Brexit Adjustment Reserve to compensate affected territories A Cohesion Policy tailored to the needs of European Regions
II. FOCUS ON TRANSPORT
Lobbying for CEF 2021-2027: Timeline TEN-T core network corridors: amendments proposed under the review of the CEF 6/8/2017 Nommination of the ITRE/TRAN co-rapporteurs 6/18/2018 Publication of the ITRE/TRAN draft report FoP CEF revised mandate approved 7/11/2018 9/23/2020 Presentation of the ITRE/TRAN draft report Informal Trilogue 8/29/2018 10/26/2020 Transport and accessibility: Deadline for amendments Informal Trilogue Prospects for 9/13/2018 12/11/2020 CPMR future Council General Approach Informal Trilogue action 12/5/2018 1/22/2021 2/22/2018 Plenary Vote Revised mandate COREPER Publication of 12/12/2018 3/10/2021 Review of the CEF post-2020: Principles DG MOVE's advocated by the CPMR Proposal Partial Agreement on CFE 2.0 Provisional Agreement on CEF 2.0 2/22/2017 6/6/2018 3/7/2019 3/11/2021 2017 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 Aujourd'hui
Lobbying for CEF 2021-2027 2016-2018 - Influencing 2018 - Influencing EP 2019-2021 - Influencing the EC Proposal Report Final Deal • Analysing the • Analysis and • Key role of our shortcomings of the reaction to EC member Regions 2014 – 2020 CEF proposal • Exchanges with EP • Building the ideal • Drafting rapporteurs: Jean- CEF 2.0 amendments Marian Marinescu • Regular meetings • Meeting with key (EPP, Romania), with DG MOVE at MEPs from TRAN Henna Virkkunen technical level Committee (EPP, Finland) and (Rapporteurs, Pavel Telička (ALDE, • Letters to Coordinators for Czech Republic) Commissioner Bulc and Valean instance) • Contact with Permanent Representations
Lobbying for CEF 2021-2027: DG MOVE Proposal Some improvements Some question marks Some wins for the to make CPMR • Still no mention of • Military mobility: • Larger share of the territorial the proposal budget for the accessibility remains rather comprehensive • A better vague and does Network governance not guarantee • Emphasis on • Maritime much visibility for sustainable transport has to Regions transport be further • Budget: hard to • Several supported predict how it will amendments in evolve in co- the annex creating decision new sections to the Corridors in line with CPMR proposals
Lobbying for CEF 2021-2027: Our Work in the EP 2017 CPMR position on CEF widely circulated 12 Key 16 amendments on the CEF 69 22 MEPs modifications 13 Additions to Amendments the Annex Answer to Brexit Public Consultation ITRE/TRAN Report EP Report 12 December CPMR 2018
Lobbying for CEF 2021-2027: key successes An additional objective & award criteria on accessibility and connectivity Core Network Corridors better cover the peripheries Higher share of the Transport envelope for the Comprehensive Network
Lobbying for TEN-T: Timeline CPMR Transport WG with a focus on TEN-T Maps 5/29/2020 Presentation of the TRAN INI draft report 9/3/2020 CPMR Transport WG with a focus on EP INI Report on TEN-T 9/7/2020 CPMR Transport WG on TEN-T with DG MOVE CPMR Transport WG on MoS with the 4/10/2019 coordinator 12/9/2020 CPMR contribution to Public Consultation 7/10/2019 CPMR contribution to Roadmap 12/17/2020 AAC workshop on TEN-T Bilbao 9/10/2019 CPMR Transport WG on TEN-T with EU institutions BSC workshop on TEN-T Helsinki Deadline for amendments 3/30/2021 10/9/2019 9/15/2020 Legislative CPMR Transport WG with a focus on Port NSC workshop on TEN-T Brussels Adoption in Plenary Proposal (tbc) 3/4/2019 11/22/2019 1/20/2021 10/15/2021 2019 mars juil. nov. mars juil. nov. mars juil. 2021 Aujourd'hui Public Consultation 4/15/2019 - 7/15/2019 Public Consultation 2/8/2021 - 5/5/2021
Lobbying for TEN-T: Key Messages An Ambitious TEN-T that contributes to the Green Deal A Punctual TEN-T that meets its deadlines A Cohesive TEN-T that enhances territorial accessibility A Maritime TEN-T that embraces the potential of waterborne transport A Modern TEN-T that looks at the future
Lobbying for TEN-T: Amending the maps • Work initiated in 2019 • Carried out by the transport working group of our 6 Geographical Commissions
Future Plans Financing opportunities • Ex-post analysis of CEF 2014-2020 with a focus on comprehensive ports • 2021-2027 opportunities • Transport in RRP Cohesion • Extension of accessibility maps to Norway (depending on EC data) • Working on accessibility criteria
cpmr.org @CPMR_Europe
You can also read