Court Issue Volume 89 - No. 24 9/8/2018 - Oklahoma Bar Association

Page created by Shannon Solis
 
CONTINUE READING
Court Issue Volume 89 - No. 24 9/8/2018 - Oklahoma Bar Association
Volume 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018

Court Issue
Court Issue Volume 89 - No. 24 9/8/2018 - Oklahoma Bar Association
OCTOBER IS                                                                                 OCT. 11 MCLE CREDIT 3/1
  DOMESTIC VIOLENCE                                                                                 OCT. 12 MCLE CREDIT 7/2
  AWARENESS MONTH
                                                                                october 11:
                                                                                Program Planner:

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TRAINING                                                      G. Gail Stricklin, Attorney, Oklahoma City

                                                                                TOPICS COVERED
FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEMS                                                           • Domestic Violence and Trauma
                                                                                 • GAL Law and Best Practices
                                                                                 • Case Study (to Include 1 Hr Ethics)

OCTOBER 11           1:30 - 3:40 p.m.                                           $75 for registration. Lawyers providing pro bono services through Legal
                                                                                Aid, Lawyers for Children, public defender GALs or court-appointed pro
                                                                                bono GALs may pre-register for $25 by contacting Renee at 405.416.7029 or
University of Tulsa College of Law Moot Courtroom,
3120 East 4th Place, Tulsa                                                      ReneeM@okbar.org. NO OTHER DISCOUNTS.
                                                                                This program will not be webcast.

                                                                                october 12:
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AT WORK                                                       Program Planner: Ginger Decoteau,
                                                                                Founder, Executive Director,
AWARENESS, PLANNING & PREVENTION                                                Community Learning Council, Inc.
                                                                                   During this program, participants will review
CoSponsored by the Community Learning Council
                                                                                case studies that detail incidents of domestic
                                                                                violence-related incidents and injuries. This program

OCTOBER 12            8:30 a.m. - 3 p.m.                                        was designed to help professionals identify warning
                                                                                signs, strengthen policies, implement safety measures
                                                                                and develop an action plan to create a safer and
University of Tulsa College of Law Moot Courtroom,
3120 East 4th Place, Tulsa                                                      supportive work environment for all employees.

                                                                                $150 for early registration (before Oct. 4). Late Fees Apply. Lawyers
                                                                                providing pro bono services through Legal Aid, Lawyers for Children, public
  FOR INFORMATION OR TO REGISTER, GO TO WWW.OKBAR.ORG/CLE                       defender GALs or court-appointed pro bono GALs may pre-register for $25
                                                                                by contacting Renee at 405.416.7029 or ReneeM@okbar.org.
     Stay up-to-date and follow us on                                           NO OTHER DISCOUNTS.      This program will not be webcast.

  1244                                               The Oklahoma Bar Journal                                 Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018
Court Issue Volume 89 - No. 24 9/8/2018 - Oklahoma Bar Association
THE OKLAHOMA BAR JOURNAL is a
publication of the Oklahoma Bar Associa-
tion. All rights reserved. Copyright© 2018
Oklahoma Bar Association. Statements or
opinions expressed herein are those of the
authors and do not necessarily reflect those
of the Oklahoma Bar Association, its officers,                                         Volume 89 – No. 24 – 9/8/2018
Board of Governors, Board of Editors or
staff. Although advertising copy is reviewed,
no endorsement of any product or service            JOURNAL STAFF                     BOARD OF EDITORS
offered by any advertisement is intended or
implied by publication. Advertisers are solely
                                                    JOHN MORRIS WILLIAMS              MELISSA DELACERDA
responsible for the content of their ads, and       Editor-in-Chief                   Stillwater, Chair
the OBA reserves the right to edit or reject        johnw@okbar.org                   LUKE ADAMS, Clinton
any advertising copy for any reason.
                                                    CAROL A. MANNING, Editor          CLAYTON BAKER, Vinita
Legal articles carried in THE OKLAHOMA
                                                    carolm@okbar.org
BAR JOURNAL are selected by the Board of                                              AARON BUNDY, Tulsa
Editors. Information about submissions can          MACKENZIE SCHEER
be found at www.okbar.org.                                                            PATRICIA A. FLANAGAN
                                                    Advertising Manager
                                                                                      Yukon
                                                    advertising@okbar.org
BAR Center Staff
                                                                                      AMANDA GRANT, Spiro
John Morris Williams, Executive Director; Gina      LACEY PLAUDIS
                                                    Communications Specialist         C. SCOTT JONES,
L. Hendryx, General Counsel; Joe Balkenbush,
                                                    laceyp@okbar.org                  Oklahoma City
Ethics Counsel; Jim Calloway, Director of Man-
agement Assistance Program; Craig D. Combs,
                                                    LAURA STONE                       ERIN MEANS DEWALT, Moore
Director of Administration; Susan Damron,
Director of Educational Programs; Beverly Petry
                                                    Communications Specialist         SHANNON L. PRESCOTT
Lewis, Administrator MCLE Commission; Carol         lauras@okbar.org                  Okmulgee
A. Manning, Director of Communications; Rob-                                          LESLIE TAYLOR, Ada
bin Watson, Director of Information Technology;
Loraine Dillinder Farabow, Peter Haddock,
Tracy Pierce Nester, Katherine Ogden,
Steve Sullins, Assistant General Counsels                                    OFFICERS &
Les Arnold, Gary Berger, Debbie Brink,
                                                                             BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Melody Claridge, Cheryl Corey, Ben Douglas,                           KIMBERLY HAYS, President, Tulsa;
Dieadra Florence, Johnny Marie Floyd,               RICHARD STEVENS, Vice President, Norman; CHARLES
Matt Gayle, Suzi Hendrix, Debra Jenkins,
                                                    W. CHESNUT, President-Elect, Miami; LINDA S. THOMAS,
Rhonda Langley, Jamie Lane, Durrel
Lattimore, Ramey McMurray,                          Immediate Past President, Bartlesville; MATTHEW C. BEESE,
Renee Montgomery, Whitney Mosby,                    Muskogee; JOHN W. COYLE III, Oklahoma City; MARK E.
Lacey Plaudis, Tracy Sanders, Mackenzie             FIELDS, McAlester; KALEB K. HENNIGH, Enid; BRIAN T.
Scheer, Mark Schneidewent, Laura Stone,             HERMANSON, Ponca City; JAMES R. HICKS, Tulsa; ALISSA
Margaret Travis, Krystal Willis, Laura Willis,      HUTTER, Norman; JAMES L. KEE, Duncan; BRIAN K. MOR-
Jennifer Wynne & Roberta Yarbrough
                                                    TON, Oklahoma City; JIMMY D. OLIVER, Stillwater; BRYON J.
Oklahoma Bar Association 405-416-7000               WILL, Yukon; D. KENYON WILLIAMS JR., Tulsa; NATHAN D.
Toll Free 800-522-8065                              RICHTER, Mustang, Chairperson, OBA Young Lawyers Division
FAX 405-416-7001
Continuing Legal Education 405-416-7029             The Oklahoma Bar Journal (ISSN 0030-1655) is published three
Ethics Counsel 405-416-7055                         times a month in January, February, March, April, May, August,
General Counsel 405-416-7007                        September, October November and December and bimonthly in
Lawyers Helping Lawyers 800-364-7886                June and July by the Oklahoma Bar Association, 1901 N. Lincoln
Mgmt. Assistance Program 405-416-7008               Boulevard, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105. Periodicals postage
Mandatory CLE 405-416-7009                          paid at St. Joseph, Michigan.
Board of Bar Examiners 405-416-7075                 Subscriptions $60 per year except for law students registered with
Oklahoma Bar Foundation 405-416-7070                the OBA and senior members who may subscribe for $30; all active
                                                    members included in dues. Single copies: $3
                                                    Postmaster Send address changes to the Oklahoma Bar Association,
    www.okbar.org                                   P.O. Box 53036, Oklahoma City, OK 73152-3036.

Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018                       The Oklahoma Bar Journal                                         1245
Court Issue Volume 89 - No. 24 9/8/2018 - Oklahoma Bar Association
1246   The Oklahoma Bar Journal   Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018
Court Issue Volume 89 - No. 24 9/8/2018 - Oklahoma Bar Association
Oklahoma Bar Association

                                               table of
                                                      contents
                                                            Sept. 8, 2018 • Vol. 89 • No. 24

    page
       1248         Index to Court Opinions

       1249         Opinions of Court of Criminal Appeals

       1253	2019 OBA Board of Governors Vacancies
                    and Nominating Petitions

       1255         Calendar of Events

       1256         Disposition of Cases Other Than by Publication

Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018           The Oklahoma Bar Journal                                 1247
Court Issue Volume 89 - No. 24 9/8/2018 - Oklahoma Bar Association
Index to Opinions of Court of Criminal Appeals

2018 OK CR 32 ROY DALE THOMPSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA,
   Appellee. Case No. F-2016-1117....................................................................................................... 1249

                  NOTICE OF REAPPOINTMENT OF INCUMBENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE
                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
   The current term of office of the United States Magistrate Judge Steven P. Shreder at Muskogee, Oklahoma, is due to
 expire on May 14, 2019. The United States District Court is required by law to establish a panel of citizens to consider
 the reappointment of the magistrate judge to a new eight-year term.
   The duties of the position are demanding and wide-ranging. Such duties include, but are not limited to:
       (1) Conduct of preliminary proceedings in criminal cases;
       (2) Trial and disposition of misdemeanor cases;
       (3) 	Conduct of various pretrial matters and evidentiary proceedings on delegation from the judges of
             the district court; and
       (4) Trial and disposition of civil cases upon consent of the litigants.
   Comments from members of the bar and the public are invited as to whether the incumbent magistrate judge should
 be recommended by the panel for reappointment by the court. Comments should be directed to:
                                Tami Collins, Chief Deputy Clerk
                                United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
                                P.O. Box 607
                                Muskogee, OK 74402
   Comments must be received by October 19, 2018.

1248                                                    The Oklahoma Bar Journal                              Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018
Court Issue Volume 89 - No. 24 9/8/2018 - Oklahoma Bar Association
Opinions of Court of Criminal Appeals
                                                         Manner and Form of Opinions in the Appellate Courts;
                 See Rule 1.200, Rules — Okla. Sup. Ct. R., 12 O.S. Supp. 1996 (1997 T. 12 Special Supplement)

                   2018 OK CR 32                                 mission of a felony or the crime of bur-
                                                                 glary in the second degree.
ROY DALE THOMPSON, Appellant, v. THE
   STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee.                               4. Mr. Thompson was denied his right to the
                                                                  effective assistance of trial counsel, in viola-
    Case No. F-2016-1117. August 30, 2018
                                                                  tion of the 6th and 14th Amendments to the
                      OPINION                                     United States Constitution and Art. II, §§ 7,
                                                                  9, and 20, of the Oklahoma Constitution.
LEWIS, VICE PRESIDING JUDGE:
                                                              5. Based on the facts and circumstances of
  ¶1 Roy Dale Thompson, Appellant, was tried
                                                                  this case, Mr. Thompson’s sentences are
by jury and convicted of Count 1, second
                                                                  grossly excessive and should shock the
degree burglary, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, §
                                                                  conscience of this Court.
1435; Count 2, assault with a deadly weapon,
in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 652; Count 3, pos-             6. Cumulative errors deprived Mr. Thomp-
session of a firearm after former conviction of a                 son of a fair proceeding and a reliable out-
felony, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2014, §                       come.
1283(A); and Count 4, possession of a firearm
during the commission of a felony, in violation                                   FACTS
of 21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 1287,1 in the District                 ¶2 On the morning of November 25, 2015,
Court of Lincoln County, Case No. CF-2015-                  Appellant and his accomplice, Marcus Catron,
370A. In the sentencing stage, the jury found               arrived in the small town of Davenport, Okla-
Appellant committed these crimes after former               homa, hoping to burglarize and perhaps steal
conviction of two (2) or more felonies, and sen-            one or more cars in the area. This plan led them
tenced Appellant to life imprisonment and a                 to approach the home of the victim at around 10
$10,000.00 fine in each of Counts 1 through 4.              a.m. Catron knocked at the door of the victim’s
The Honorable Cynthia Ferrell Ashwood, Dis-                 residence. The victim, who had been paying
trict Judge, pronounced judgment and ordered                bills, slipped his pistol into his back brace and
the sentences served concurrently.2 Mr. Thomp-              opened the door. Catron then distracted the vic-
son appeals in the following propositions of                tim with some questions about raking his leaves.
error:                                                      Appellant was already breaking into the victim’s
  1. 
     Mr. Thompson was denied due process                    truck, looking for something to steal.
     when he was convicted of a crime that                    ¶3 The victim declined Catron’s offer to rake
     does not exist. The Judgment and Sentence              his leaves but stepped outside to direct him
     for Count II must be vacated.                          toward some other potential customers. Appel-
  2. Mr. Thompson has suffered double pun-                 lant saw the victim talking to Catron and shot
      ishment by his convictions and sentences              his pistol at the victim through the windshield
      on Count III — possession of a firearm                of the truck. The victim heard a bullet whiz
      after former conviction of a felony and               past him, approximately a foot away, and
      Count IV — possession of a firearm during             strike the side of the house. The victim drew
      the commission of a felony in violation of            his pistol and returned several shots in Appel-
      due process under the 14th Amendment to               lant’s direction, wounding him in the belly.
      the United States Constitution and Art. II,           Appellant returned more shots as he took off
      § 7, of the Oklahoma Constitution.                    running, and managed to get away. The victim
                                                            ordered Catron to the ground at gunpoint and
  3. Insufficient evidence was presented at trial          called police, who came and arrested him.
      to show beyond a reasonable doubt that
      Mr. Thompson committed the crime of                    ¶4 Around 5:30 p.m. that evening, another
      possession of a firearm during the com-               Davenport resident saw a man he didn’t know

Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018                  The Oklahoma Bar Journal                                        1249
stumbling along a road in Davenport, then fall-           specifically enumerated assault with a deadly
ing down, and figured him for drunk. He told              weapon as a separate crime under section
his wife to call police, but the man disap-               652(C), but had not done so. Avants, 1983 OK
peared. A few hours later, this same man                  CR 35, ¶ 5, 660 P.2d at 1052; see also, Meggett v.
appeared on their front porch, leaning against            State, 1979 OK CR 89, ¶ 10, 599 P.2d 1110, 1114
the wall. Appellant told the couple he’d been             (finding “[a]n assault — whether by firearm or
hurt in a car accident and needed medical                 by some other dangerous weapon — made
attention. He mentioned that his friend had               without the intent to kill is proscribed by [21
been driving, but when asked where the friend             O.S.2011,] § 645”). Under this longstanding in-
was, Appellant said he didn’t know.                       terpretation of subsection 652(C), Appellant’s
                                                          conviction for assaulting the victim with a
  ¶5 The couple invited Appellant into their
                                                          deadly weapon with intent to do bodily harm,
home and called police. Hearing their descrip-
                                                          without proof of an accompanying battery, is
tion of the man, police told the couple to quickly
                                                          plainly erroneous.
clear out of their house. Police later took Appel-
lant into custody and eventually transported                ¶9 We remedy plain error only when it seri-
him to Tulsa, where he underwent surgery to               ously affects the fairness, integrity, or public
remove a bullet fragment from his stomach.                reputation of the proceedings. Hogan, 2006 OK
Appellant’s weapon was never recovered.                   CR 19, ¶ 38, 139 P.3d at 923. A conviction under
                                                          section 652(C) carries up to life imprisonment
                   ANALYSIS
                                                          for a first offense, and is subject to the 85%
   ¶6 In Proposition One, Appellant argues that           Rule. 21 O.S.Supp.2015, § 13.1(5). Appellant’s
his conviction under 21 O.S.2011, § 652(C)3 for           current conviction and life sentence thus ren-
the crime of assaulting the victim with a dead-           der him ineligible for parole consideration for
ly weapon, without proof of an accompanying               at least twenty (23) years, three (3) months
battery, is reversible error. Because this ques-          longer than a non-85% life sentence. 57 O.S.
tion of statutory interpretation is raised for the        Supp.2013, § 332.7(B)(requiring parole consid-
first time on appeal, Appellant must show that            eration after 1/3 of sentence); Anderson v. State
a plain or obvious error affected the outcome of          2006 OK CR 6, ¶ 24, 130 P.3d 273, 282-83 (not-
the proceedings. Hogan v. State, 2006 OK CR 19,           ing Pardon and Parole Board policy of comput-
¶ 38, 139 P.3d 907, 923; Simpson v. State, 1994           ing a life sentence as 45 years).
OK CR 40, ¶ 2, 876 P.2d 690, 692-93.
                                                            ¶10 The overwhelming evidence at trial, and
  ¶7 The amended information in Count 2                   the jury’s verdict that Appellant committed
charged Appellant with assaulting the victim              assault with a deadly weapon, establish beyond
with a deadly weapon by shooting at him with              a reasonable doubt that Appellant is actually
intent to do bodily harm. The trial court’s jury          guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon
instructions on this count permitted a convic-            with intent to do bodily harm or shooting at
tion of the charged crime based on the ele-               another with intent to injure, a felony violation
ments of assaulting another person with a                 of section 645.5 This crime, after two (2) or more
deadly weapon. The court also instructed the              prior felony convictions, is punishable by
jury that it could convict Appellant of the less-         twenty (20) years to life imprisonment, but is
er-included offenses of assault with a danger-            not subject to the 85% Rule.6
ous weapon with intent to do bodily harm, in
                                                            ¶11 Appellant’s erroneous conviction and
violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 645,4 or of simple
                                                          sentence for a crime subject to the 85% Rule
assault. By failing to object to the information
                                                          significantly affects his parole consideration
or the trial court’s instructions in these particu-
                                                          eligibility, and thus seriously affects the fair-
lars, Appellant has waived all but plain error.
                                                          ness and integrity of the proceedings. We
  ¶8 However, it is plain or obvious that a vio-          therefore exercise our discretion to remedy this
lation of section 652(C) requires not only proof          error by modifying Appellant’s conviction to
of an assault, but also an accompanying bat-              assault with a dangerous weapon or shooting
tery. Avants v. State, 1983 OK CR 35, ¶¶ 4-7, 660         with intent to injure, after former conviction of
P.2d 1051, 1051-52; see also, OUJI-Cr(2nd), In-           two (2) or more felonies, and affirming the sen-
struction No. 4-3 (identifying section 652                tence of life imprisonment.7 No additional
offense as requiring “that the defendant com-             relief is warranted.
mit both assault and battery”). The Court in
Avants found that the Legislature could have

1250                                       The Oklahoma Bar Journal                  Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018
¶12 In Proposition Two, Appellant claims his            ¶15 These claims are either moot or without
convictions and sentences for assault with a             merit. We agreed with Appellant that his con-
deadly weapon, possessing a firearm in the               viction for assault with a deadly weapon was
commission of a felony (burglary), and pos-              plainly erroneous, and modified the conviction
sessing a firearm after former conviction of a           to assault with a dangerous weapon or shoot-
felony, punish him separately for a single               ing with intent to injure. Appellant’s remaining
criminal act in violation of 21 O.S. 2011, § 11.         section 11 and sufficiency of the evidence
Reviewing for plain error, as defined above,             claims are without merit. Assuming any defi-
this claim is without merit. While Counts 3 and          ciency in counsel’s performance in failing to
4 arose in part from one continuous act of fire-         raise these errors at trial, Appellant cannot
arm possession, Appellant’s possession of the            show a reasonable probability of a different
firearm in the commission of burglary is suffi-          outcome. Proposition Four is therefore denied.
ciently “separate and distinct” from both his
                                                            ¶16 Proposition Five challenges Appellant’s
earlier criminal possession of the firearm and
                                                         life sentences as excessive. This Court will not
his subsequent assault of the victim to warrant
                                                         disturb a sentence within statutory limits un-
separate punishments. Sanders v. State, 2015
                                                         less, under the facts and circumstances of the
OK CR 11, ¶¶ 8-12, 358 P.3d 280, 284-85 (find-
                                                         case, it shocks the conscience of the Court. Pul-
ing possession of single, stolen firearm within
                                                         len v. State, 2016 OK CR 18, ¶ 16, 387 P.3d 922,
defendant’s home cannot be punished as both
                                                         928. Appellant is a violent recidivist who fired
felon in possession and knowingly concealing
                                                         several shots at his latest victim during an
stolen property; but that section 11 generally
                                                         attempted auto burglary, and might have easi-
allows punishment for both the felonious pos-
                                                         ly committed a senseless murder. His sentences
session of a firearm and for other crimes in
                                                         do not shock the conscience. Proposition Five
which the weapon is possessed or used). Prop-
                                                         is denied.
osition Two is denied.
                                                           ¶17 Appellant argues in Proposition Six that
   ¶13 In Proposition Three, Appellant chal-
                                                         the accumulation of prejudice from errors war-
lenges the sufficiency of the evidence to show
                                                         rants relief. We remedied the only prejudicial
possession of a firearm in the commission of a
                                                         error by modification. There is no other indi-
felony (burglary), and the crime of second
                                                         vidual, harmful error, and no cumulative preju-
degree burglary. We determine whether the
                                                         dice from individually harmless errors. Barnett v.
evidence, taken in the light most favorable to
                                                         State, 2011 OK CR 28, ¶ 34, 263 P.3d 959, 970.
the prosecution, permits any rational trier of
                                                         Proposition Six is therefore denied.
fact to find the essential elements of the crime
charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Spuehler v.                             DECISION
State, 1985 OK CR 132, ¶ 7, 709 P.2d 202, 203-04.
This Court will accept all reasonable inferences           ¶18 The Judgment and Sentence in Count 2 is
and credibility choices that tend to support the         MODIFIED to assault with a dangerous weap-
verdict. Washington v. State, 1986 OK CR 176, ¶          on or shooting another with intent to injure,
8, 729 P.2d 509, 510. We find the evidence suf-          and otherwise AFFIRMED. The Judgment and
ficient in each count, and no relief is warranted.       Sentence in Counts 1, 3, and 4 is AFFIRMED.
Proposition Three is denied.                             Pursuant to Rule 3.15, Rules of the Oklahoma
                                                         Court of Criminal Appeals, Title 22, Ch.18, App.
   ¶14 In Proposition Four, Appellant argues             (2018), the MANDATE is ORDERED issued
that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to        upon the delivery and filing of this decision.
object to: (1) the improper conviction in Count
2 (see Proposition One); (2) the violations of                 AN APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT
section 11 (see Proposition Two); and the insuf-                COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY
ficient evidence of burglary and possession of                 HONORABLE CYNTHIA FERRELL
a firearm in commission of burglary (see Prop-                  ASHWOOD, DISTRICT JUDGE
osition Three). We review these claims under
the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washing-         APPEARANCES AT TRIAL
ton, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674        Charles Michael Thompson, 104 W. 8th, Chan-
(1984), requiring Appellant to show both defi-           dler, OK 74834, Attorney for Defendant
cient performance and prejudice. Id., 466 U.S.
at 687, 104 S.Ct. at 2064.

Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018               The Oklahoma Bar Journal                                     1251
Emily Mueller, Asst. District Attorney, 811                                   2. Appellant must serve 85% of his sentence in Count 2 before he is
                                                                          eligible for consideration for parole. 21 O.S.Supp.2015, § 13.1 (5).
Manvel Ave., Ste. 1, Chandler, OK 74834, Attor-                               3. The pertinent part of section 652(C), says:
ney for the State                                                                Any person who commits any assault and battery upon another …
                                                                                 by means of any deadly weapon … shall upon conviction be
APPEARANCES ON APPEAL                                                            guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the State Peni-
                                                                                 tentiary not exceeding life (emphasis added).
                                                                              4. Every person who, with intent to do bodily harm and without
Sarah MacNiven, P.O. Box 926, Norman, OK                                  justifiable or excusable cause, commits any assault, battery, or assault
73070, Attorney for Appellant                                             and battery upon the person of another with any sharp or dangerous
                                                                          weapon, or who, without such cause, shoots at another, with any kind of
Mike Hunter, Attorney General, Joshua L.                                  firearm, air gun, conductive energy weapon or other means whatever,
                                                                          with intent to injure any person, although without the intent to kill such
Lockett, Asst. Attorney General, 313 N.E. 21st                            person or to commit any felony, upon conviction is guilty of a felony
St., Oklahoma City, OK 73105, Attorneys for                               …” (emphasis added).
                                                                              5. The trial court’s definition of “assault” required the jury to find
Appellee                                                                  Appellant guilty of a “willful and unlawful attempt or offer to do a
                                                                          bodily harm to another.” We therefore find the jury’s guilty verdict of
OPINION BY: LEWIS, V.P.J.                                                 assault in Count 2 tantamount to a verdict that Appellant shot at the
LUMPKIN, P.J.: Concur                                                     victim with a formed intent to do bodily harm.
                                                                              6. With Appellant’s two or more prior convictions, he is subject to
HUDSON, J.: Concur                                                        the same sentence for either crime, ten (20) years to life imprisonment.
KUEHN, J.: Concur                                                         21 O.S.2011, § 51.1(B).
ROWLAND, J.: Concur                                                           7. Birdine v. State, 2004 OK CR 7, ¶ 6, 85 P.3d 284, 286 (modifying
                                                                          murder conviction to manslaughter, where necessary finding of fetus’s
                                                                          viability to convict of murder was rendered doubtful under erroneous
    1. The jury acquitted Appellant of Count 5, possession of burglary    instruction, but evidence showed, beyond a reasonable doubt, that
tools.                                                                    defendant committed manslaughter by killing an unborn quick child;
                                                                          and affirming life sentence).

                               CONQUER YOUR
                                 MOUNTAIN
                                                                    BURNOUT • DEPRESSION
                                                               ANXIETY • SUBSTANCE ABUSE
                                                                RELATIONSHIP CHALLENGES

        LAWYERS HELPING LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
                                FREE 24-HOUR CONFIDENTIAL ASSISTANCE
                                                    800.364.7886
                                                          WWW.OKBAR.ORG/LHL

1252                                                       The Oklahoma Bar Journal                               Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018
Bar News

2019 OBA Board of
Governors Vacancies
            Nominating Petition deadline was 5 p.m. Friday, Sept. 7, 2018
OFFICERS                              Supreme Court Judicial                   bars may file appropriate resolu-
President-Elect                       District Five                            tions nominating a candidate for
Current: Charles W. Chesnut, Miami    Current: James L. Kee, Duncan            this office.
Mr. Chesnut automatically becomes     Carter, Cleveland, Garvin, Grady,          Not less than 60 days before the
OBA president Jan. 1, 2019            Jefferson, Love, McClain, Murray         opening of the annual meeting,
(One-year term: 2019)                 and Stephens counties                    50 or more voting members of the
Nominee: Susan B. Shields,            (Three-year term: 2019-2021)             association may file with the
Oklahoma City                         Nominee: Vacant                          executive director a signed petition
Vice President                        Member At Large                          nominating a candidate for the
Current: Richard Stevens, Norman      Current: Alissa Hutter, Norman           office of president elect or vice
(One-year term: 2019)                 Statewide                                president, or three or more county
Nominee: Lane R. Neal,                (Three-year term: 2019-2021)             bar associations may file appro-
Oklahoma City                         Nominee: Josh D. Lee, Vinita             priate resolutions nominating a
                                      Miles T. Pringle, Oklahoma City          candidate for the office.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS                                                               If no one has filed for one of the
Supreme Court Judicial                                                         vacancies, nominations to any of the
                                      SUMMARY OF
District Three                                                                 above offices shall be received from
                                      NOMINATIONS RULES
Current: John W. Coyle III,                                                    the House of Delegates on a petition
Oklahoma City                           Not less than 60 days prior to the
                                      annual meeting, 25 or more voting        signed by not less than 30 delegates
Oklahoma County                                                                certified to and in attendance at the
(Three-year term: 2019-2021)          members of the OBA within the
                                      Supreme Court Judicial District          session at which the election is held.
Nominee: David T. McKenzie,
                                      from which the member of the               See Article II and Article III of
Oklahoma City
                                      Board of Governors is to be elected      OBA Bylaws for complete informa-
Andrew E. Hutter, Oklahoma City
                                      that year, shall file with the execu-    tion regarding offices, positions,
Supreme Court Judicial                tive director, a signed petition         nominations and election procedure.
District Four                         (which may be in parts) nominating         Elections for contested positions
Current: Kaleb K. Hennigh, Enid       a candidate for the office of member     will be held at the House of Dele-
Alfalfa, Beaver, Beckham, Blaine,     of the Board of Governors for and        gates meeting Nov. 9, during the
Cimarron, Custer, Dewey, Ellis,       from such judicial district, or one      Nov. 7-9 OBA Annual Meeting.
Garfield, Harper, Kingfisher,         or more county bar associations            Terms of the present OBA officers
Major, Roger Mills, Texas, Washita,   within the judicial district may file    and governors will terminate Dec.
Woods and Woodward counties           a nominating resolution nominating       31, 2018.
(Three-year term: 2019-2021)          such a candidate.                          Nomination and resolution forms
Nominee: Vacant                         Not less than 60 days prior to the     can be found at www.okbar.org/
                                      annual meeting, 50 or more voting        members/BOG/BOGvacancies.
                                      members of the OBA from any or all
                                      judicial districts shall file with the
                                      executive director a signed petition                        NOTICE
                                      nominating a candidate to the office      This issue went to press before the deadline, and
                                                                                 the list of nominees may not be complete. See
                                      of member at large on the Board of           www.okbar.org/annualmeeting for updates.
                                      Governors, or three or more county

  Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018                The Oklahoma Bar Journal                                                 1253
Oklahoma Bar Association
Nominating Petitions
(See Article II and Article III of the OBA Bylaws)

OFFICERS                               Andrew E. Hutter, Oklahoma City        Miles T. Pringle, Oklahoma City
President-Elect                        Nominating Petitions have been         Nominating Petitions have been
Susan B. Shields, Oklahoma City        filed nominating Andrew E. Hutter      filed nominating Miles T. Pringle,
Nominating Petitions have been         for election of Supreme Court Judi-    Oklahoma City for election of Mem-
filed nominating Susan B. Shields      cial District No. 3 of the Oklahoma    ber at Large of the Oklahoma Bar
for President-Elect of the Oklahoma    Bar Association Board of Governors     Association Board of Governors for
Bar Association Board of Governors     for a three-year term beginning Jan-   a three-year term beginning January
for a one-year term beginning          uary 1, 2019. Twenty-five of the       1, 2019. Fifty of the names thereon
January 1, 2019.                       names thereon are set forth below:     are set forth below:
A total of 573 signatures appear on    John W. Coyle III, Brian Morton,       David A. Poarch, Valerie K. Couch,
the petitions.                         Sonja Porter, Mike Arnett, Kenneth     Len Cason, Paul Cason, Cody Coo-
                                       Watson, Jason Spanich, Myong           per, Mack Martin, Amber Martin,
Vice President                                                                John W. Coyle III, Jeremy Tubb,
                                       Chung, Joan Lopez, Lance Phillips,
Lane R. Neal, Oklahoma City                                                   Lynn Pringle, Laura Pringle, John
                                       E. Seth Hendrick, Kelli Kelso, Red-
Nominating Petitions have been         mond Kemether, John Hunsucker,         David Hershberger, C. Miles Tolbert,
filed nominating Lane R. Neal for      Paul Austin, Lily Cruickshank,         Lisa Cummings, Benjamin E. Russ,
Vice President of the Oklahoma         Keith McGill, Todd Kernal, Amber       Michael P. Sullivan, Kent P. Sullivan,
Bar Association Board of Governors     Godfrey, Josh Lee, Aaron Glover,       Douglas Dale, R. Lindsay Bailey,
for a one-year term beginning          Brian Young, Hayley Potts, Phillip     Greg Tontz, Jennifer Fischer, James
January 1, 2019.                       Winters, Angela Sonagerra and          Richard Martin, Mark H. Price, Jack
A total of 127 signatures appear on    Amanda Everett                         H. Petty, James R. Moore, Armando
the petitions.                         A total of 33 signatures appear on     Rosell, Linda K. Ellis, Elizabeth D.
                                       the petitions.                         Crampton, Joel Hall, Steven R.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS                                                            McConnell, Sally K. Edwards, Amy
                                       Member at Large
Supreme Court Judicial District                                               Douglas, Alex Kaiser, Curtis Kaiser,
                                       Josh D. Lee, Vinita
No. 3                                                                         Jennifer Kaiser, Blu Hulsey, Brent
                                       Nominating Petitions have been         Johnson, Timothy Dowd, Megan
David T. McKenzie,                     filed nominating Josh D. Lee, Vinita
Oklahoma City                                                                 Dowd , Chase Schnebel, John Wad-
                                       for election of Member at Large of     ley, Nicole Blair, Gregory Chan-
Nominating Petitions have been         the Oklahoma Bar Association           solme, Andrew Harroz, Richard
filed nominating David T. McKenzie     Board of Governors for a three-year    Thomas Hornbeek , Daniel Hays,
for election of Supreme Court Judi-    term beginning January 1, 2019.        Daniel Couch, Peter Scimeca, Kelsey
cial District No. 3 of the Oklahoma    A total of 66 signatures appear on     Quillian and Lindsey Ridgway
Bar Association Board of Governors     the petitions.
for a three-year term beginning Jan-                                          A total of 105 signatures appear on
uary 1, 2019.                                                                 the petitions.
A total of 57 signatures appear on
the petitions.

   1254                                       The Oklahoma Bar Journal                 Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018
Calendar of Events

September
12      OBA Group Insurance Committee meeting;
        11:30 a.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City
        with teleconference; Contact Jo Angela Ables
        405-272-9221

14      OBA Law-Related Education Committee
        meeting; 12 p.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma
        City with teleconference; Contact Amber Peckio Garrett
        918-895-7216

15      OBA Young Lawyers Division meeting; 10 a.m.;
        Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City; Contact
        Nathan Richter 405-376-2212
                                                                    21      OBA Board of Governors meeting; 10 a.m.;
17      OBA Board of Editors meeting; 2 p.m.; Oklahoma                      Stillwater; Contact John Morris Williams
        Bar Center, Oklahoma City with videoconference;                     405-416-7000
        Contact Melissa DeLacerda 405-624-8383
                                                                            OBA Lawyers Helping Lawyers Assistance
18      OBA Bench and Bar Committee meeting;                                Program Committee meeting; 12 p.m.; Oklahoma
        12 p.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City; Contact                Bar Center, Oklahoma City with BlueJeans; Contact
        Rod Ring 405-325-3702                                               Hugh E. Hood 918-747-4357 or Jeanne Snider
                                                                            405-366-5466
        OBA Women in Law Committee meeting;
        4 p.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City with             25      OBA Access to Justice Committee meeting;
        BlueJeans; Contact Melanie Christians 405-705-3600                  11:30 a.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City with
        or Brittany Byers 405-682-5800                                      BlueJeans; Contact Rod Ring 405-325-3702
19      OBA Family Law Section meeting; 11:30 a.m.;                 26      OBA Immigration Law Section meeting; 11 a.m.;
        Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City; Contact                         Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City; Contact
        Jeffrey H. Crites 580-242-4444                                      Melissa R. Lujan 405-600-7272
        OBA Indian Law Section meeting; 12 p.m.;                            OBA Financial Institutions and Commercial
        Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City with tele-                       Law Section meeting; 12 p.m.; Oklahoma Bar
        conference; Contact Valery Giebel 918-581-5500                      Center, Oklahoma City with teleconference; Contact
                                                                            Miles T. Pringle, 405-848-4810
        OBA Clients’ Security Fund Committee
        meeting; 2 p.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma              27      OBA General Practice/Solo and Small Firm
        City with teleconference; Contact Micheal Salem                     Section meeting; 12 p.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center,
        405-366-1234                                                        Oklahoma City with videoconference; Contact
20      OBA Diversity Committee meeting; 12 p.m.;
                                                                            Ashley B. Forrester 405-974-1625
        Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City with tele-               28      OBA Professional Responsibility Commission
        conference; Contact Telana McCullough 405-267-0672                  meeting; 9:30 a.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma
                                                                            City; Contact Gina Hendryx 405-416-7007
        OBA Professionalism Committee meeting;
        4 p.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City with                     OBA Environmental Law Section meeting;
        teleconference; Contact Linda Scoggins 405-319-3510                 11 a.m.; Oklahoma Bar Center, Oklahoma City with
                                                                            teleconference; Contact Teena G. Gunter 405-522-4576

Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018                          The Oklahoma Bar Journal                                                1255
Disposition of Cases
Other Than by Published Opinion

       COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS                         court further ordered the sentences to be served
          Thursday, August 16, 2018                      concurrently, with all but seven years suspend-
   RE-2017-0695 — Michael Angelo Terry, Ap-              ed. From this judgment and sentence Justin
pellant, entered a plea of guilty on May 5, 2016,        Anthony Braun has perfected his appeal. The
in Oklahoma County District Court Case No.               Judgment and Sentence of the District Court is
CF-2016-1792 to Count 1 – Possession of a Con-           AFFIRMED. Opinion by: Lewis, V.P.J.; Lump-
trolled Dangerous Substance (Meth), a felony,            kin, P.J., concurs; Hudson, J., concurs; Kuehn,
and Count 2- Possession of Drug Parapherna-              J., concurs; Rowland, J., concurs.
lia. He was sentenced to ten years on Count 1               F-2017-235 — Cody Lloyd Haynes, Appel-
and 1 year on Count 2, all suspended with                lant, was tried in a non-jury trial for the crimes
rules and conditions of probation. The State             of Count 1, child abuse by injury, and Counts
filed an application to revoke Appellant’s sus-          2-5, child neglect, in Case No. CF-2015-192 in
pended sentences on September 1, 2016. Fol-              the District Court of Creek County. The Honor-
lowing a revocation hearing on June 26, 2017,            able Douglas W. Golden, District Judge, found
before the Honorable Cindy H. Truong, Appel-             Haynes guilty and sentenced him to forty
lant’s suspended sentences were revoked in               years imprisonment with all but the first twen-
full. The sentences were ordered to run concur-          ty years suspended and a $500.00 fine in Count
rently. Appellant appeals the revocation of his          1, and ten years imprisonment and a $500.00
suspended sentences. The revocation of Appel-            fine in each of Counts 2-5. The trial court fur-
lant’s suspended sentences is AFFIRMED.                  ther ordered the sentences on Counts 2-5 to be
Opinion by: Rowland, J.; Lumpkin, P.J., con-             served concurrently with each other but con-
curs; Lewis, V.P.J., concurs; Hudson, J., con-           secutively to the sentence on Count 1, with
curs; Kuehn, J., concurs.                                credit for time served. From this judgment and
  F-2017-782 — Larry Gene Keeler, Appellant,             sentence Cody Lloyd Haynes has perfected his
was tried by jury for the crimes of Count 1 -            appeal. The Judgments and Sentences are
First Degree Murder and Count 2 - Cruelty to             AFFIRMED. Opinion by: Lewis, V.P.J.; Lump-
Animals in Case No. CF-2014-306 in the Dis-              kin, P.J., concurs; Hudson, J., concurs; Kuehn,
trict Court of McClain County. The jury re-              J., concurs; Rowland, J., concurs.
turned a verdict of guilty and recommended as               F-2017-563 — Farron Robert Deerleader, Ap-
punishment life imprisonment without parole              pellant, was tried by jury for the crimes of
on Count 1 and a $5000 fine on Count 2. The              Count 1, second degree burglary, and Count 2,
trial court sentenced accordingly. From this             larceny of an automobile, both after former
judgment and sentence Larry Gene Keeler has              conviction of two or more felonies, in Case No.
perfected his appeal. AFFIRMED. Opinion by:              CF-2016-319 in the District Court of Creek
Kuehn, J.; Lumpkin, P.J., concur; Lewis, V.P.J.,         County. The jury returned a verdict of guilty
concur; Hudson, J., concur; Rowland, J., concur.         and set punishment at forty-five years impris-
  F-2017-821 — Justin Anthony Braun, Appel-              onment and a $10,000.00 fine in Count 1, and
lant, was tried in a non-jury trial for the crimes       forty-five years imprisonment and a $50,000.00
of Count 1, lewd or indecent proposals to a              fine in Count 2. The trial court sentenced ac-
child under sixteen (16), and Count 2, attempt-          cordingly and ordered the sentences to be
ed lewd or indecent acts to child under sixteen          served consecutively. From this judgment and
(16), in Case No. CF-2016-316 in the District            sentence Farron Robert Deerleader has per-
Court of Custer County. The Honorable F.                 fected his appeal. The Judgment and Sentence
Doug Haught found Braun guilty and sen-                  is AFFIRMED. Opinion by: Lewis, V.P.J.; Lump-
tenced him to fifteen years imprisonment and             kin, P.J., concurs; Hudson, J., concurs; Kuehn,
a $500.00 fine in Count 1, and ten years impris-         J., concurs; Rowland, J., concurs.
onment and a $500.00 fine in Count 2. The trial

1256                                      The Oklahoma Bar Journal                  Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018
Thursday, August 23, 2018                   in CF-2016-24 to run concurrently with each
   RE-2017-51 — Justin Kyle Taylor, Appellant,          other and further ordered the sentences in
appeals from the revocation in full of his sus-         CF-2014-65 to run consecutive to each other
pended sentences in Case No. CF-2014-1450 in            and consecutive with the sentences imposed in
the District Court of Cleveland County, by the          CF-2016-24. From this judgment and sentence
Honorable Tracy Schumacher, District Judge.             Earnesto Ray Loya has perfected his appeal.
AFFIRMED. Opinion by: Lewis, V.P.J.; Lump-              The Judgment and Sentence of the District
kin, P.J., concurs; Hudson, J., concurs; Kuehn,         Court is hereby AFFIRMED. Opinion by:
J., concurs in results; Rowland, J., concurs.           Lumpkin, P.J.; Lewis, V.P.J., Concur; Hudson, J.,
                                                        Concur; Kuehn, J., Specially Concurs; Row-
  F-2016-908 — Orlando Delgado, Appellant,              land, J., Specially Concurs.
was tried by jury for the crime of shooting with
the intent to kill in Case No. CF-2015-6626 in            F-2017-466 — Appellant, Jerimiah Don New-
the District Court of Tulsa County. The jury            comb, was charged on November 6, 2014, with
returned a verdict of guilty and set punishment         Count 1 – Manufacture of CDS, Methamphet-
at thirty years imprisonment. The trial court           amine, a felony; Counts 2-6 – Child Neglect,
sentenced accordingly. From this judgment               felonies; Count 7 – Speeding in a School Zone,
and sentence Orlando Delgado has perfected              a misdemeanor; Count 8 - Driving Under Sus-
his appeal. The Judgment and Sentence of the            pension, a misdemeanor; and Count 9 – Failure
District Court is AFFIRMED. Opinion by:                 to Maintain Security, a misdemeanor. Appel-
                                                        lant pled guilty on December 17, 2014, and was
Lewis, V.P.J.; Lumpkin, P.J., concurs in results;
                                                        accepted into the Delaware County Drug Court
Hudson, J., concurs; Kuehn, J., concurs in re-
                                                        Program. Pursuant to the plea agreement, up-
sults; Rowland, J., concurs in results.
                                                        on successful completion of the program, all
  F-2017-566 — Donald Ray Lockridge, Appel-             charges would be dismissed; if not successful,
lant, was tried by jury for the crime of attempt-       he would be sentenced to life imprisonment
ing to obtain a controlled substance by forged          with twenty years to serve and the balance
or altered prescription, after former conviction        suspended on Counts 1-6. He would also be
of two or more felonies, in Case No. CF-2015-           fined $50,000.00 on Count 1, $500.00 on Counts
60 in the District Court of Canadian County.            2-6, $20.00 on Count 7, and $250.00 on Counts
The jury returned a verdict of guilty and set           8 and 9. The State filed an application on Au-
punishment at fifteen years imprisonment. The           gust 25, 2016, to remove Appellant from the
trial court sentenced accordingly. From this            Drug Court program and for sentencing pursu-
judgment and sentence Donald Ray Lockridge              ant to the plea agreement. Following a hearing
has perfected his appeal. The Judgment and              on April 26, 2017, before the Honorable Robert
Sentence of the District Court is AFFIRMED.             G. Haney, District Judge, Appellant was termi-
Opinion by: Lewis, V.P.J.; Lumpkin, P.J., con-          nated from Drug Court and sentenced in accor-
curs; Hudson, J., concurs; Kuehn, J., concurs;          dance with the plea agreement. The sentences
Rowland, J., concurs.                                   were ordered to run concurrently. Appellant
  F-2017-65 — Appellant, Earnesto Ray Loya,             appeals from his termination from Drug Court.
was tried by jury and convicted of Child Sexu-          Appellant’s termination from the Delaware
al Abuse (Count 1) and Lewd Molestation                 County Drug Court Program is AFFIRMED.
(Count 2) in District Court of Alfalfa County           Opinion by: Kuehn, J.; Lumpkin, P.J., concur;
Case Number CF-2014-65. The jury recom-                 Lewis, V.P.J., concur; Hudson, J., concur; Row-
mended as punishment, imprisonment for                  land, J., concur.
twenty (20) years in Count 1 and five (5) years           F-2017-605 — Mark Anthony Ford, Appel-
in Count 2. Appellant was simultaneously                lant, was tried by jury for the crimes of Count I
tried by jury and convicted of Forcible Sodomy          – Possession of Controlled Drug (Cocaine Base)
(Count 1) and Rape in the First Degree (Count           after former conviction of two or more felonies
2) in District Court of Alfalfa County Case             and Count II - Failure to Obey Traffic Control
Number CF-2016-24. The jury recommended                 Device (misdemeanor) in Case No. CF-14-359
as punishment, imprisonment for ten (10) years          in the District Court of Comanche County. The
in each of the counts. The trial court sentenced        jury returned a verdict of guilty and recom-
Appellant in accordance with the jury’s recom-          mended as punishment 21 years imprisonment
mendations and imposed a period of post-                on Count I and a $250 fine in Count II. The trial
imprisonment supervision for five (5) years in          court sentenced accordingly. From this judg-
each case. The trial court ordered the sentences        ment and sentence Mark Anthony Ford has

Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018              The Oklahoma Bar Journal                                    1257
perfected his appeal. AFFIRMED. Opinion by:             $5,000.00 fine on Count 2. The Honorable Kelly
Kuehn, J.; Lumpkin, P.J., concur in results;            Greenough, District Judge, sentenced accord-
Lewis, V.P.J., concur; Hudson, J., concur; Row-         ingly and ordered the sentences on Counts 1
land, J., concur.                                       and 2 to run consecutively each to the other
  F-2017-838 — Troy Jason McNeely, Appel-               and consecutively to Appellant’s sentences in
lant, was tried by jury for the crime of Injuring       Tulsa County Case Nos. CF-2012-1691 and CF-
a Public Building after former conviction of a          2012-3726. From this judgment and sentence
felony in Case No. CF-2016-299 in the District          Jack Leroy O’Donnell has perfected his appeal.
Court of Creek County. The jury returned a              AFFIRMED. Opinion by: Hudson, J.; Lumpkin,
verdict of guilty and recommended as punish-            P.J., Concurs; Lewis, V.P.J., Concurs; Kuehn, J.,
ment 10 years imprisonment and a $1,000 fine.           Concurs in Results; Rowland, J., Concurs.
The trial court sentenced accordingly. From               F-2017-148 — Antonio Bernard Ford, Appel-
this judgment and sentence Troy Jason McNeely           lant, was tried by jury for the crime of Robbery
has perfected his appeal. AFFIRMED. Opinion             with a Firearm, in Case No. CF-2014-3766, in
by: Kuehn, J.; Lumpkin, P.J., concur; Lewis,            the District Court of Oklahoma County. The
V.P.J., concur; Hudson, J., concur; Rowland, J.,        jury returned a verdict of guilty and recom-
concur.                                                 mended as punishment ten years imprison-
          Thursday, August 30, 2018                     ment. The trial court sentenced accordingly.
                                                        From this judgment and sentence Antonio Ber-
   F-2017-98 — Charles Edward Frierson, Ap-             nard Ford has perfected his appeal. AFFIRMED.
pellant, was tried by jury, in Case No. CF-2015-        Opinion by: Hudson, J.; Lumpkin, P.J., Con-
2124, in the District Court of Oklahoma Coun-           curs; Lewis, V.P.J., Concurs; Kuehn, J., Concurs;
ty, of Count 1: Trafficking in Illegal Drugs            Rowland, J., Recuses.
(Cocaine Base); Count 2: Trafficking in Illegal
Drugs (Phencyclidine); Count 3: Possession of              F-2017-593 — Watani Phinnes Gleason, Ap-
a Controlled Dangerous Substance (Marijuana)            pellant, was tried by jury for the crime of Mur-
with Intent to Distribute; Count 4: Possession          der in the First Degree (Malice Aforethought)
of an Offensive Weapon While Committing a               in Case No. CF-2016-779 in the District Court
Felony; and Count 6: Possession of Proceeds             of Tulsa County. The jury returned a verdict of
Derived from a Violation of the Uniform Con-            guilty and set punishment at life imprisonment
trolled Dangerous Substances Act. The jury re-          with the possibility of parole. The trial court
turned a verdict of guilty and recommended as           sentenced accordingly. From this judgment and
punishment twenty years imprisonment and a              sentence Watani Phinnes Gleason has perfected
$100,000.00 fine on Count 1; life imprisonment          his appeal. AFFIRMED. Opinion by: Rowland,
and a $100,000.00 fine on Count 2; five years           J.; Lumpkin, P.J., concurs in results; Lewis, V.P.J.,
imprisonment and a $20,000.00 fine on Count             concurs; Hudson, J., concurs; Kuehn, J., concurs.
3; seven years imprisonment on Count 4; and               F-2017-585 — David Allen Knight, Appel-
five years imprisonment and a $25,000.00 fine           lant, was tried by jury for the crime of Robbery
on Count 6. The Honorable Cindy H. Truong,              by Force or Fear, After Former Conviction of
District Judge, sentenced Appellant in accor-           Two or More Felonies (Count 1) and Endanger-
dance with the jury’s verdicts. However, Judge          ing Others While Eluding Police Officer, After
Truong ordered the sentences on all counts to           Former Conviction of Two or More Felonies
run concurrently. From this judgment and sen-           (Count 2) in Case No. CF-2015-222 in the Dis-
tence Charles Edward Frierson has perfected             trict Court of Pottawatomie County. The jury
his appeal. AFFIRMED. Opinion by : Hudson,              returned verdicts of guilty and set punishment
J.; Lumpkin, P.J., Concurs; Lewis, V.P.J., Con-         at twenty years imprisonment on Count 1 and
curs; Kuehn, J., Concurs; Rowland, J., Concurs.         three years imprisonment on Count 2, with
  F-2016-1008 — Jack Leroy O’Donnell, Appel-            nine months post imprisonment supervision
lant, was tried by jury for the crimes of Count         upon his release. The trial court sentenced ac-
1: First Degree Manslaughter; and Count 2:              cordingly and ordered the sentences to run
Driving Under the Influence - Great Bodily              consecutively to each other, and also consecu-
Injury, in Case No. CF-2015-2919, in the District       tive to his sentences in Oklahoma County Case
Court of Tulsa County. The jury returned a ver-         Nos. CF-2016-9955, CF-2014-925, CF-2014-1717,
dict of guilty and recommended as punishment            CF-2006-2172, and CF-2015-7401. From these
twelve years imprisonment and a $10,000.00 fine         judgments and sentences David Allen Knight
on Count 1; and two years imprisonment and a            has perfected his appeal. AFFIRMED. Opinion

1258                                     The Oklahoma Bar Journal                    Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018
by: Rowland, J.; Lumpkin, P.J., concurs; Lewis,         viction of two or more felonies in Oklahoma
V.P.J., concurs; Hudson, J., concurs; Kuehn, J.,        County Case No. CF-2015-2061. That same date
concurs.                                                he entered a guilty plea to three counts of False
   F-2017-153 — Michael Ray Crawley, Appel-             Declaration of Ownership to a Pawnbroker, after
lant, was tried by jury for the crime of First          former conviction of two or more felonies, in
Degree Felony Murder (Count 1), Eluding/                Oklahoma County Case No. CF-2015-4378.
Attempting to Elude a Police Officer, After Two         George was sentenced to fifteen (15) years for
or More Prior Convictions (Count 2), Second             each of the counts in the two cases, the sen-
Degree Burglary, After Two or More Prior Con-           tences to be served concurrently with each
victions (Count 3) and Possession of Burglary           other, with the balance suspended after com-
Tools (Count 8) in Case No. CF-2015-866 in the          pletion of Drug Offender Work Camp. On July
District Court of Pittsburg County. The jury re-        25, 2016, the State filed an Application to
turned verdicts of guilty and set punishment at         Revoke George’s suspended sentence in Case
life imprisonment with the possibility of parole        No. CF-2005-6817. On October 11, 2016, the
on Count 1, three years imprisonment on Count           State filed an Application to Revoke George’s
2, six years imprisonment on Count 3 and one            suspended sentences in Case Nos. CF-2010-
year imprisonment on Count 8. The trial court           2865, CF-2015-2061 and CF-2015-4378 alleging
sentenced accordingly. Judge Mills ordered the          George violated his terms and conditions of
sentences on Counts 1, 2, 3 and 8 to be served          probation by failing to pay court costs and by
concurrently, but consecutively to Crawley’s            having contact with a child under the age of 18.
revoked sentences. Judge Mills further award-           At the conclusion of a revocation hearing con-
ed credit for time served, but only from the            ducted November 7, 2016, in the District Court
time of Crawley’s arrest to the revocation of his       of Oklahoma County, the Honorable Bill Graves,
prior sentences. From these judgments and               District Judge, revoked George’s suspended
sentences Michael Ray Crawley has perfected             sentences in full. The revocation of George’s
his appeal. AFFIRMED. The Judgement and                 suspended sentence in Oklahoma County Case
Sentence of the district court on Counts 1 and 2        No. CF-2005-6817 is AFFIRMED. The district
is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for a                 court’s order revoking George’s sentences in
new trial. Appellant’s Notice of Extra-Record           Oklahoma County Case Nos. CF-2010-2865,
Evidence Supporting Proposition IX of Brief of          CF-2015-2061 and CF-2015-4378 is REVERSED
Appellant and/or Alternatively Application              with instructions to DISMISS. Opinion by:
for Evidentiary Hearing on Sixth Amendment              Lumpkin, P.J.; Lewis, V.P.J., Concur; Hudson, J.,
Claims is MOOT. Opinion by: Rowland, J.;                Concur in Result; Kuehn, J., Concur; Rowland,
Lumpkin, P.J., concurs in part and dissents in          J., Concur.
part; Lewis, V.P.J., concurs in results; Hudson,          F-2017-476 — Michael Brent Davis, Appel-
J., concurs; Kuehn, J., concurs.                        lant, was tried by jury for the crime of Child
  RE-2016-1049 — On February 27, 2006, Ap-              Sexual Abuse in Case No. CF-2014-660 in the
pellant George, represented by counsel, entered         District Court of Pottawatomie County. The
a guilty plea to Second Degree (Statutory) Rape         jury returned a verdict of guilty and set pun-
in Oklahoma County Case No. CF-2005-6817.               ishment at eight years imprisonment and a
George was sentenced to twenty (20) years               $5,000.00 fine. The trial court sentenced accord-
with all but the first eight (8) years suspended,       ingly. From this judgment and sentence Michael
subject to terms and conditions of probation. On        Brent Davis has perfected his appeal. AF-
July 22, 2010, George entered a guilty plea to          FIRMED. Opinion by: Rowland, J.; Lumpkin,
Attempted Larceny of a Vehicle and Possession           P.J., concurs; Lewis, V.P.J., concurs; Hudson, J.,
of a Controlled Dangerous Substance (Metham-            concurs; Kuehn, J., specially concurs.
phetamine), after former conviction of a felony,          F-2017-714 — Tommy Dean Phillips, Appel-
in Oklahoma County Case No. CF-2010-2865.               lant, was tried by jury for the crime of unlawful
George was sentenced to ten (10) years for each         possession of controlled dangerous substance,
count, the sentences to run concurrently with           after former conviction of two or more felonies
each other. The balance of the sentences was            in Case No. CF-2014-433 in the District Court
suspended upon George’s successful comple-              of Carter County. The jury returned a verdict of
tion of a substance abuse treatment program.            guilty and set punishment at fourteen years
On June 26, 2016, George entered a guilty plea          imprisonment. The trial court sentenced ac-
to Possession of a Controlled Dangerous Sub-            cordingly. From this judgment and sentence
stance (Methamphetamine), after former con-             Tommy Dean Phillips has perfected his appeal.

Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018              The Oklahoma Bar Journal                                     1259
The Judgment and Sentence of the District                  116,803 — Katie McGaha, Petitioner, vs. Buf-
Court is AFFIRMED. Opinion by: Lewis, V.P.J.;            falo Wild Wings, Stone Trust Insurance Co.
Lumpkin, P.J., concurs in results; Hudson, J.,           And the Workers’ Compensation Commission,
concurs; Kuehn, J., concurs; Rowland, J., con-           Respondents. Petitioner, Katie McGaha (Claim-
curs.                                                    ant), appeals from the Workers’ Compensation
        COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS                           Commission’s order denying her quest for
             (Division No. 1)                            workers’ compensation benefits. In 2016,
         Thursday, August 16, 2018                       Claimant was working as a server at a Buffalo
                                                         Wild Wings restaurant owned by Respondent
   116,179 — Thomas A. Quinn, Plaintiff/                 when a co-worker threw a ranch dressing-
Appellant, vs. Estate of Aubrey K. McClendon,            covered potato wedge at her. Moments later in
Defendant/Appellee. Appeal from the District             the kitchen Claimant sprayed cleaning solution
Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. Hon-                 on the co-worker’s backside. The co-worker
orable Patricia G. Parrish, Judge. Plaintiff/            then pushed Claimant in the back, causing
Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s              injuries. A Commission ALJ found any injury
order granting the motion for summary judg-              sustained by Claimant was caused by “horse-
ment of Defendant/Appellee Estate of Aubrey              play” and Claimant was not an “innocent vic-
K. McClendon on Plaintiff’s claim to collect a           tim.” The Commission affirmed. We hold that
promissory note. In this accelerated review              although Claimant’s co-worker initiated the
proceeding, Plaintiff asserts there is a contro-         horseplay in this case, Claimant transformed
versy of material fact concerning the alleged            herself from an innocent bystander to an active
forgery of the subject promissory note which             participant in the horseplay when she deviated
precludes the summary adjudication of his                from her customary duties, retaliated against
claim. The uncontroverted evidence estab-                the co-worker and sprayed her with the clean-
lished the note, purportedly executed in 1991,           ing solution. Pursuant to 85A O.S. Supp. 2013
was printed in Tahoma font, but that the Taho-           §2(9)(b)(1), Claimant’s injuries are not compen-
ma font was not created until 1995. If the               sable. The Commission’s order is SUSTAINED.
Tahoma font did not exist prior to 1995, the             Opinion by Bell, P.J.; Joplin, J., and Buettner, J.,
note printed in that font and purportedly exe-           concur.
cuted by Decedent was obviously created at
some time after that date, and could not have                        Thursday, August 30, 2018
been created earlier in 1991 as alleged by Plain-           115,901 — Grey Aldridge and Jamie Aldridge,
tiff. AFFIRMED. Opinion by Joplin, J.; Bell, P.J.,       Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v.
and Swinton, J. (sitting by designation), concur.        R&R Homes, LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Lia-
   116,755 — JPMorgan Chase Bank,N.A., Suc-              bility Company, Defendant/Appellee. Appeal
cessor by Merger to Chase Home Finance LLC,              from the District Court of Logan County, Okla-
Successor by merger to Chase Manhattan                   homa. Honorable Louis A. Duel, Judge. In this
Mortgage Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, vs.            action for breach of a home warranty, Plain-
Candas Christie Golden, a/k/a Candas C.                  tiffs/Appellants, Grey and Jamie Aldridge, hus-
Golden, a/k/a Candas C. Golden-Been, a/k/a               band and wife, appeal from the trial court’s
Candas Estes, Defendant/Appellant. Appeal                order compelling the parties to arbitration. In
from the District Court of Cleveland County,             2014, Plaintiffs purchased a home from Defen-
Oklahoma. Honorable Thad Balkman, Trial                  dant/Appellee, R&R Homes, LLC, an Oklaho-
Judge. Defendant/Appellant Candas C. Gold-               ma Limited Liability Company. Defendant
en appeals from the trial court’s order granting         contractually agreed to provide Plaintiffs with
summary judgment to Plaintiff/Appellee JP-               a home warranty. The home warranty contract
Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Successor by Merg-              contained an arbitration provision. In January
er to Chase Home Finance LLC, Successor by               2016, Plaintiffs filed the instant lawsuit against
Merger to Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corpo-                Defendant claiming the home has significant
ration (Bank). The undisputed material facts in          water problems due to Defendant’s poor work-
the record show that Bank was the holder of              manship and improper grading. In February
the note entitled to enforcement and that Gold-          2016, Defendant filed an answer and alleged
en was in default. Accordingly, Bank was enti-           affirmative defenses and counterclaims. De-
tled to judgment as a matter of law and we               fendant’s answer did not plead its contractual
AFFIRM. Opinion by Buettner, J., Bell, P.J., and         right to arbitration as an affirmative defense.
Joplin, J., concur.                                      In November 2016, Defendant moved to com-
                                                         pel arbitration, which the trial court granted.

1260                                      The Oklahoma Bar Journal                   Vol. 89 — No. 24 — 9/8/2018
You can also read