Course Syllabus: PPOL-G 631 Research Methods - II Michael P Johnson, Jr. University of Massachusetts Boston
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
University of Massachusetts Boston From the SelectedWorks of Michael P. Johnson Spring November 30, 2021 Course Syllabus: PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II Michael P Johnson, Jr. Available at: https://works.bepress.com/michael_johnson/48/
University of Massachusetts Boston Department of Public Policy and Public Affairs Public Policy Ph.D Program PPOL-G 631 Research Methods for Public Policy II Spring 2020 I. Course Administration Course Meetings: Wednesday, 1:00 PM – 3:30 PM (Online via Zoom) Professor: Michael P. Johnson McCormack Hall, 3rd floor, room 428A 617-287-6967 michael.johnson@umb.edu Skype: michael.johnson.64 http://www.umb.edu/academics/mgs/faculty/michael_johnson/ Office Hours (Online via Zoom): Monday, 3 – 4 PM; Wednesday, 4 – 5 PM; Thursday, 8 – 9 PM Course Description: This is the second course of the research methods sequence that is required for students in the PhD program in Public Policy. This course will prepare students to produce professional-quality research and will provide exposure to a variety of special topics in policy analysis. Students will design and implement a research project suitable for conference presentation or journal submission that is relevant to their field of interest. The instructor, and guest lecturers as appropriate, will present topics necessary to develop well-rounded policy researchers, as well as special topics that are responsive to students’ particular needs. The primary goal of this course is to help students understand how different research methods can complement each other to create high-quality research, and to build a community of scholars that provides substantive yet critical assessments of research progress, as opposed to a mastery of individual research methods alone. This course will strive to balance discussion of research methods that may be new to many students, and discussion of students’ own research projects. Between sixty and eighty minutes of each lecture will be spent discussing readings; the remainder of each lecture will be devoted to student presentations and critiques of their own research products which represent their progress towards a conference-quality paper. Where appropriate, students will be asked to distribute their assignments, sometimes in incomplete draft form, to classmates for review and discussion. Lecture topics include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods. Students will present their own research project in stages throughout the semester and receive feedback on their progress. They will submit and present their final paper at the end of the semester. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 1 rev. 4/30/20
Topics covered: Qualitative methods: Text and media content analysis; problem structuring methods and value-focused thinking Quantitative methods: Simulation; decision modeling; statistics and econometrics Policy analysis: Model development; cost-benefit analysis; evaluation; systems thinking Research design, tools, frameworks: Writing research papers; social experiments; mixed- methods analysis, transdisciplinary thinking; archival research; community-engaged operations research Grading Policy: The grade allocation is as follows: Course Component Proportion of Final Grade Assignments (5) 30% Course project 50% Class participation 20% Assignments consist of components of an actual research project: paper prospectus, literature review, conceptual framework, outline, data analysis. The course project is intended to result in a professional-quality research paper, one that could be submitted for presentation at an academic conference or for publication in an academic journal. Such a paper requires extensive preparation; therefore, students may consider choosing a topic that represents an extension of the research proposal they prepared in PPOL-G 630 Research Methods I, or which extends work they have performed in previous or current research assistantships. The course paper will address: A contemporary, policy-relevant problem; A conceptual framework that explicates the organizational, political and/or policy context within which the problem of interest can be situated and understood; A theoretical framework that generates propositions or Hypotheses that may be evaluated in a rigorous way; Collection of data, from secondary sources, or, where possible, primary sources; Support for propositions or hypotheses using models and methods from core Public Policy PhD program courses, or other well-known methods, applied to data gathered specifically for this paper, and Discussion of significance of findings, limitations of analysis and next steps. Expectations for paper length will be consistent with those that typically apply for academic conferences: 15 - 20 pages, 1.5-spaced, exclusive of references, figures & tables, and appendices. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 2 rev. 4/30/20
Class participation consists of productive, informed verbal contributions during lectures, presentations of in-progress research and constructive feedback for classmates’ presentations, and presentation of final paper. Students are expected to have completed all assigned readings by the start of the week’s class meeting. Interim drafts of assignments and feedback on these drafts from writing partners should be posted on the Blackboard discussion board. This course, though designed for doctoral students, welcomes master’s students. Masters student course requirements are identical to those of doctoral students. However, it is understood that master’s students bring a different set of experiences, perspectives and expectations to the course as compared with doctoral students. For example, master’s student contributions to the class, in both written and oral form, are more likely to reflect their current employment experiences. They may have less time or inclination to explore scholarly resources beyond the required readings. They have not received training in theories and analytic methods that are intended to produce independent scholars. Therefore, I will evaluate and grade master’s student course submissions in comparison to each other master’s students, and not in comparison to doctoral students. I will apply norms for master’s student grading that reflect the range of quality of submissions and my subjective assessment of the capabilities of the master’s students. Readings: Required (for purchase): Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1- 4522-2610-1. Stokey, Elizabeth and Richard Zeckhauser. 1978. A Primer for Policy Analysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN: 978-0393090987. Required (excerpts available on Blackboard): Agresti, A. and B. Finlay. 2008. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, 4th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall. ISBN: 978-0130272959. Baum, J.A.C. (Ed.) 2002. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd. ISBN: 978-0631216957. Briggs, X., Popkin, S.J. and J. Goering. 2010. Moving to Opportunity: The Story of an American Experiment to Fight Ghetto Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195392845. Creswell, J.W. and V.L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN: 978- 1412975179. Desai, A. (Ed.) 2012. Simulation for Policy Inquiry. New York: Springer. ISBN: 978- 1461416647. Edwards, W., Miles, R.F. Jr., D. von Winterfeldt. 2007. Advances in Decision Analysis: From Foundations to Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521682305. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 3 rev. 4/30/20
Fisher, F., Miller, G.J. and M.S. Sidney (Eds). 2007. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN: 978-1574445619. Greenberg, D., Linksz, D. and M. Mandell. 2003. Social Experimentation and Public Policymaking. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press. ISBN: 978- 0877667117. Hart, C. 1998. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd. ISBN: 0761959750. Hedrick, T.E., Bickman, L. and D.J. Rog. 1993. Applied Research Design: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803932340. Johnson, M.P. (Ed.) 2012. Community-Based Operations Research: Decision Modeling for Local Impact and Diverse Populations. New York: Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4614- 0805-5. Johnson, M.P., Hollander, J. and E.D. Kinsey. 2020. Supporting Shrinkage: Better Planning and Decision-Making for Legacy Cities, manuscript under development. Johnson, M.P., Keisler, J., Solak, S., Turcotte, D., Bayram, A. and R.B. Drew. 2016. Decision Science for Housing and Community Development: Localized and Evidence-Based Responses to Distressed Housing and Blighted Communities. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-1-118-97499-5. Joymer, R.L., Rouse, W.A. and A.A. Glatthorn. 2013. Writing the Winning Thesis or Dissertation, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. ISBN: 978-1452258782. Kim, D.H. 1992. Systems Archetypes I: Diagnosing Systemic Issues and Designing High- Leverage Interventions. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communications. ISBN: 1-883823- 00-5. Kirst, M., Schaefer-McDaniel, N., Hwang, S. and P. O’Campo (Eds.) 2011. Converging Disciplines: A Transdisciplinary Research Approach to Urban Health Problems. New York: Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4419-6329-1. Leavy, P. 2011. Essentials of Transdisciplinary Research: Using Problem-Centered Methodologies. Abington, Oxon, UK: Routledge. ISBN: 978-1598745931. Locke, L.F., Spirduso, W.W. and S.J. Silverman. 2014. Proposals that Work: A Guide for Planning Dissertations and Grant Proposals, 6th Edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1452216850. Meadows, D.H. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company. Midgley, G. 2001. Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, Practice. New York: Springer. ISBN: 978-0306464881. Neuendorf, K.A. 2016. The Content Analysis Guidebook, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN: 978-1412979474. Neuendorf, K.A. 2001. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN: 978-0761919780. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 4 rev. 4/30/20
Roberts, C.M. 2010. The Dissertation Journey, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. ISBN: 978-1412977982. Spadero, A. (Ed.) 2007. Microsimulation as a Tool for the Evaluation of Public Policies: Methods and Applications. Bilbao, Spain: Fundación BBVA. ISBN: 978-84-96515- 17-8. Strober, M.H. 2010. Interdisciplinary Conversations: Challenging Habits of Thought. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. ISBN: 978-0804772310. Studenmund, A.H. 2000. Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide, 4th Edition. New York: Addison-Wesley. ISBN: 978-0321064813. Selected journal articles, book chapters, research reports and white papers. Supplementary: Hindle, G.A. and R. Vidgen. 2018. Developing a business analytics methodology: A case study in the foodbank sector. European Journal of Operational Research 268: 836– 851. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.031. Johnson, M.P., Solak, S., Drew, R.B. and J. Keisler. 2013. Property Value Impacts of Foreclosed Housing Acquisitions under Uncertainty. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 47(4): 292 – 308. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2013.07.003. Keeney, R.L. 1996. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674931985. Krippendorf, K.A. 2018. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 4th Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN: 978-1506395661. Midgley, G. and A. E. Ochoa-Arias, Eds. 2004. Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. ISBN: 978-1-4613-4716-3. Neuendorf, K.A. 2006. The Content Analysis Guidebook Online. Web: http://academic.csuohio.edu/kneuendorf/content/. Maxwell, J.A. 2012. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN: 978-1412981194. Patton, M.Q. 2010. Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1606238721. Richards, L. 2006. “Teach-yourself NVivo 7: The Introductory Tutorials”. Web: http://download.qsrinternational.com/Document/NVivo7/NVivo7_Tutorials_Lyn_Ri chards.pdf. Retrieved September 5, 2016. Schutt, R.K. 2014. Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research, 8th Edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483350677. Strauss, A. and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Producing Grounded Theory, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803959408. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 5 rev. 4/30/20
Van Evera, S. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN: 978-0801484575. Weiss, R.S. 1995. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: The Free Press. ISBN: 978-0684823126. Zheng, K., Padman, R., Krackhardt, D., Johnson, M.P. and H.S. Diamond. 2010. Social Networks and Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Records: Insights from a Pilot Study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 17(3): 328 – 336. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000877. Readings designated as “Required (for purchase)” are available at the UMass Boston bookstore, or from commercial vendors. Readings designated as “Required (excerpts available on Blackboard)” or “Supplementary” may be downloaded from the Blackboard Learn course website or directly from the Internet. Readings will be assigned the week before the lecture in which they are to be discussed. Lecture and Lab Resources: All class meetings will take place in McCormack Hall, third floor, room 440 (M-3-440; Public Policy conference room) unless otherwise indicated in the syllabus. Some class meetings, or portions thereof, that require access to software will use the Public Policy and Public Affairs Department computer lab, M-3-414 or other venues. The Public Policy and Public Affairs computer lab is available for student use 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Access to this lab requires a key code available from the professor. ***Modified March 24, 2020: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all instruction at UMass Boston has been moved online. All lectures from March 25 – May 13 will be online, accessible via Zoom voice & video. Online class meetings will be recorded and posted to Blackboard. Web Resources: This course has a Blackboard Learn course management website containing lectures, readings, assignments, Internet resources and a discussion board for questions of general interest and responses. The instructor will post general questions received by email, and responses to these questions to the Blackboard discussion board. To access the Blackboard Learn course page: Go to https://umb.umassonline.net/; Enter your UMass Boston email username (the part before “@umb.edu”) and password; Choose “PPOL-G 631 P 1 01 Research Methods II Spring 2020” from the “My Courses” portion of the “My UMass Boston” page. Other websites that may have resources relevant to our course content include: Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM): http://www.appam.org/. Urban Affairs Association: http://urbanaffairsassociation.org/. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 6 rev. 4/30/20
Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning: https://www.acsp.org/default.aspx. INFORMS Online: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences: http://www.informs.org/. Accommodations: Section 504 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 offers guidelines for curriculum modifications and adaptations for students with documented disabilities. If applicable, students may obtain adaptation recommendations from the Ross Center for Disability Services, M-1-401, 617-287-7430. The student must present these recommendations and discuss them with each professor within a reasonable period, preferably by the end of Drop/Add period. Written Work: Students are encouraged to use the American Psychological Association (APA) style standards in their written work. I encourage students to utilize the Graduate Writing Center when necessary. The Center’s website is: https://www.umb.edu/academics/vpass/academic_support/tutoring/graduate_writing_center. A related website is http://blogs.umb.edu/gwc/. It is important to seek assistance from the Center earlier, rather than later, in the semester. Student Conduct: Students are required to adhere to the University of Massachusetts Boston Student Code of Conduct. The Code is available online at: https://www.umb.edu/life_on_campus/dean_of_students/student_conduct. See particularly Appendix B: Academic Honesty (https://www.umb.edu/editor_uploads/images/life_on_campus/FINALUMBCode9-5-18- Appendix_B_V2.pdf). Section I of this appendix states in part, that: “The University defines violations to include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Submitting as one’s own an author’s published or unpublished work (e.g. material from a journal, Internet site, newspaper, encyclopedia), in whole, in part, or in paraphrase, without fully and properly crediting the author. 2. Submitting as one’s own work or materials obtained from another student, individual, or agency without full and proper attribution. 3. Submitting as one’s own work material that has been produced through unacknowledged or unauthorized collaboration with others. 4. Submitting substantially the same work to more than one course without prior approval from all instructors involved: i.e., dual or multiple submission.” You are encouraged to visit and review the UMass website on Plagiarism & Citations: https://umb.libguides.com/c.php?g=351180. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 7 rev. 4/30/20
II. Class Meeting Schedule Date Topic Description January 29 Lecture #1 - Reading: Introduction to Stokey and Zeckhauser: policy analysis Chapter 1, “Thinking About Policy Choices”, p. 1 – 7. Chapter 2, “Models: A General Discussion”, p. 8 – 21. Discussion: Preliminary ideas for semester paper Assignment #1: 1-page paper prospectus: topic, goal, research question, data, methods, anticipated research questions, significance (due February 12) February 5 Lecture #2 – Reading: Writing a Required: research paper, Part I: Academic Creswell, Chapter 1, “The Selection of a Research paper Approach”, p. 1 – 23. fundamentals Hedrick, Bickman and Rog: Chapter 1, “The Nature of Applied Research”, p. 1 – 14. Chapter 2, “Defining the Focus of the Research”, p. 15 – 37. “PhD: How to write a great research paper”. YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AYxMbYZQ 1Y. Joymer, Rouse, and Glatthorn, Chapter 12: “Mastering the Academic Style”, p. 170 – 192. Locke, Spirduso, and Silverman, Chapter 7: “Style and Form in Writing the Proposal”, p. 127 – 136. Santiago, A.M., Galster, G.C., Kaiser, A.A., Santiago- San-Roman, A., Grace, R.A. and A.W. Linn. 2010. Low-Income Homeownership: Does it Necessarily Mean Sacrificing Neighborhood Quality to Buy a Home? Journal of Urban Affairs 32(2): 171 – 198. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00478.x. Optional: “How to Write a Scientific Research Paper, Part 1” YouTube: PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 8 rev. 4/30/20
Date Topic Description http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oAFVHb21H M “How to Write a Scientific Research Paper, Part 2” YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QV2c6QKsM A&feature=fvwrel “How to Write a Scientific Research Paper, Part 3” YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuwFDwVWp 4A&feature=relmfu Discussion: Progress towards paper prospectus February 12 Lecture #3 – Reading: Writing a Required: research paper, Part II: Literature Creswell, Chapter 2, “Review of the Literature”, p. 25 reviews – 50. Hart, Chapter 1, “The Literature Review in Research”, p. 1 – 25. Lee, H. 2010. “Using Concept Maps to Organize Reviews of Literature”. Web: https://www.causeweb.org/cause/sites/default/files /webinars/materials/2010-04-06.ppt. NCSU Libraries. 2016. “Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students”. YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2d7y_r65HU. Roberts, Chapter 9, “Reviewing the Literature”, p. 85 – 110. Jiminez-Castellanos, O. 2010. Relationship Between Educational Resources and School Achievement: A Mixed Method Intra-District Analysis. Urban Review 42:351–371. doi: 10.1007/s11256-010- 0166-6. Optional: Johnson, M.P., Hollander, J. and Kinsey, E.D. 2020. Supporting Shrinkage: Better Planning and Decision-Making for Legacy Cities, in development. “Chapter 2: What Can Data and Technology Do for Shrinking Cities and Distressed Communities?” PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 9 rev. 4/30/20
Date Topic Description Discussion: Completed paper prospectus Assignment #2: Literature review and conceptual/theoretical framework (due March 6) February 19 Lecture #4 – Reading: Writing a Stokey and Zeckhauser, Chapter 3, “The Model of research paper, Choice”, p. 22 – 44. part III: Theoretical and Creswell, Chapter 3, “The Use of Theory”, p. 51 – 76. conceptual Roberts, Chapter 11, “Writing the Introduction”, p. frameworks 129 - 134 Levin, J. and S. Tadelis. 2010. Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Cities. The Journal of Industrial Economics 58(3): 507 - 541. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 6451.2010.00430.x. Discussion: Progress towards literature review and conceptual/theoretical framework Assignment #1 (Paper prospectus) graded & returned February 26 Lecture #5 – Reading: Mixed methods Required: research Creswell, Chapter 10, “Mixed Methods Procedures”, p. 215 – 240. Commonwealth of Learning. 2004. Module A5: Mixed Research Methods. Practitioner Research and Evaluation Skills Training in Open and Distance Learning. Web: http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/A5.p df. Horne, S., Scales Rostosky, S. and E.D.B. Riggle. 2011. Impact of Marriage Restriction Amendments on Family Members of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals: A Mixed-Method Approach. Journal of Social Issues 67(2): 358 – 375. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01702.x. Optional: Creswell and Plano Clark: Chapter 1, “The Nature of Mixed Methods Research”, p. 1 – 18. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 10 rev. 4/30/20
Date Topic Description Chapter 2, “The Foundations of Mixed Methods Research”, p. 19 – 52. Discussion: Progress towards literature review and conceptual/theoretical framework March 4 Lecture #6 – Reading: Variable Studenmund, Chapter 6, “Specification: Choosing the specification Independent Variables” p. 156 – 197. Agresti and Finlay, Chapter 10, “Introduction to Multivariate Relationships”, p. 301 – 320. Manturuk, K., Lindblad, M. and R. Quercia. 2010. Friends and Neighbors: Homeownership and Social Capital among Low-to-Moderate Income Families. Journal of Urban Affairs 32(4): 471 – 488. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00494.x. Discussion: Progress towards literature review and conceptual/theoretical framework (due March 6) Assignment #3: Data and analytic methods (due April 3) March 11 Lecture #7 - Reading: Policy evaluation Stokey and Zeckhauser: and cost-benefit analysis Chapter 9, “Project Evaluation: Benefit-Cost Analysis”, p. 134 – 158. Chapter 10, “The Valuation of Future Consequences: Discounting”, p. 159 – 167 Fisher, Miller and Sidney: Chapter 26, “Policy Evaluation and Evaluation Research”, p. 393 – 402. Chapter 31: “Cost-Benefit Analysis”, p. 465 – 480. Martin, F. 2001. Should Cities Subsidize Nonprofit International Organizations? A Case Study and Cost Benefit Analysis. Journal of Urban Affairs 23(3 – 4): 361 – 373. doi: 10.1111/0735- 2166.00094. Discussion: Progress towards data and analytic methods section Assignment #2 (Literature review and conceptual/theoretical framework) graded & returned March 18: No class – Spring Break PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 11 rev. 4/30/20
Date Topic Description March 25 Lecture #8 - Reading: Content analysis Neuendorf (2016): (Jennifer Gregg, guest lecturer) Chapter 1, “Defining Content Analysis”, p. 1 – 25. [ONLINE] Chapter 2, “Milestones in the History of Content Analysis”, p. 27 – 45. Larsen, A.L. and N.L. Rahn. 2014. Vocabulary Instruction on Sesame Street: A Content Analysis of the Word on the Street Initiative. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 46: 207 – 221. doi: 10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0079. Segev, S., Fernandes, J. and C. Hong. 2016. Is Your Product Really Green? A Content Analysis to Reassess Green Advertising. Journal of Advertising 45(1): 85 – 93. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2015.1083918. Discussion: Progress towards data and analytic methods section April 1 Lecture #9 – Reading: Systems thinking Required: [ONLINE] Meadows, Chapter 1, “The Basics”, p. 11 – 34. Midgley, Chapter 1, “Systems Thinking for the 21st Century”, p. 1 – 16. Lane, D.C., Munro, E. and E. Husemann. 2016. Blending Systems Thinking Approaches for Organisational Analysis: Reviewing Child Protection in England. European Journal of Operational Research 215: 613 – 623. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.041. Optional: Caffrey, L. and E. Munro. 2017. A Systems Approach to Policy Evaluation. Evaluation 23(4): 463 – 478. doi: 10.1177/1356389017730727. Kim, p. 5 – 7. Discussion: Progress towards data and analytic methods section Assignment #4: Paper outline (due April 17) PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 12 rev. 4/30/20
Date Topic Description April 8 Lecture #10 – Reading: Social Greenberg, Linksz, and Mandell: experiments Chapter 2, “Social Experimentation”, p. 11 – 44. [ONLINE] Chapter 3, “Conceptual Framework and Methodology”, p. 45 – 64. Fisher, Miller and Sidney, Chapter 25, “Social Experiments and Public Policy” Briggs, Popkin and Goering: Chapter 1, “Places and Lives”, p. 3 – 24. Chapter 3, “Great Expectations and Muddling Through”, p. 44 – 66. Chapter 4, “The Unequal Geography of Opportunity”, p. 67 – 85. Chapter 10, “Lessons”, p. 223 – 237. Appendix, “Studying Moving to Opportunity”, p. 239 – 251. Discussion: Progress towards paper outline Assignment #3 (Data and analytic methods section) graded & returned April 15 Lecture #11 – Reading: Qualitative Required: methods in decision Smith, C.M. and D. Shaw. 2019. The Characteristics modeling of Problem Structuring Methods: A Literature Review. European Journal of Operational (Maria Pache de Research 274: 403 – 426. doi: Athayde, guest 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.003. lecturer) Keeney, R.L. 1996. Value-Focused Thinking: [ONLINE] Identifying Decision Opportunities and Creating Alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research 92: 537 – 549. doi: 10.1016/0377- 2217(96)00004-5. Edwards, Miles and von Winterfeldt: Chapter 1, “Introduction”, p. 1 – 12. Chapter 18, “What Have We Learned from Our Mistakes?”, p. 351 – 374. Keisler, J., Turcotte, D.A., Drew, R. and M.P. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 13 rev. 4/30/20
Date Topic Description Johnson. 2014. Value-Focused Thinking for Community-Based Organizations: Objectives and Acceptance in Local Development. EURO Journal on Decision Processes 2: 221 – 246. doi: 10.1007/s40070-014-0032-y. Optional: Keeney. R.L. 2012. Value-Focused Brainstorming. Decision Analysis 9(4): 303 – 313. Mingers, J. 2009. “Taming Hard Problems with Soft O.R.” OR/MS Today, April 2009. Web: https://pubsonline.informs.org/do/10.1287/LYTX. 2009.04.04/full/. Ranyard, J.C., Fildes, R. and T.-I. Hu. 2015. Reassessing the Scope of OR Practice: The Influences of Problem Structuring Methods and the Analytics Movement. European Journal of Operational Research 245(1): 1 – 13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.058. Discussion: Progress towards paper outline Assignment #5: Preliminary findings (due May 8) April 22 Lecture #12 - Reading: Transdisciplinary Required: research (Rosalyn Negron, guest Leavy, Chapter 1: “Transdisciplinarity: Disciplinary lecture) to Transdisciplinary Knowledge-Building”, p. 13 – 35. [ONLINE] Max-Neef, M.A. 2005. Foundations of Transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 53: 5 – 6. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014 Spreng, D. 2014. Transdisciplinary Energy Research: Reflecting the Context. Energy Research & Social Science 1: 65 – 73. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.005. Strober, Chapter 3, “Difficult Dialogues: Talking Across Cultures”, p. 31 – 49. Optional: Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M. and C.J. Thomas. 2008. Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science: Practice, Principles, and PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 14 rev. 4/30/20
Date Topic Description Challenges. Sustainability Science 7 (Supplement 1): 25 – 43. doi: 10.1007/s11625- 011-0149-x. Discussion: Progress towards preliminary findings Assignment #4 (Paper outline) graded & returned April 29 Lecture #13 – Reading: Archival research Lee, A. “How (and How Not) to Use Archival Sources (Jessica Holden, in Political Science”. Working paper. Web: Healey Library, http://www.rochester.edu/college/faculty/alexande guest lecture) r_lee/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/archives.pdf. [ONLINE] Schmidt, L. 2016. “Using Archives: A Guide to Effective Research.” Society of American Archivists. Web: https://www2.archivists.org/usingarchives. Baum, Chapter 35, “Archival Research Methods”, p. 805 – 828. “Collecting and Using Archival Data.” Community Tool Box, University of Kansas, https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of- contents/evaluate/evaluate-community- interventions/archival-data/main. Healey Library: “Primary Sources for Online Learning”, https://umb.libguides.com/primarysourcesonline. One of the following: Burgoon, B., Fine, J., Jacoby, W. and D. Tichenor. 2010. Immigration and the Transformation of American Unionism. The International Migration Review 44(4): 933 – 973. doi: 10.1111/j.1747- 7379.2010.00831.x. or Iveson, K. 2014. Building a City For ‘The People’: The Politics of Alliance-Building in the Sydney Green Ban Movement. Antipode 46(4): 992 – 1013. doi: 10.1111/anti.12047. Class activity: “Sample primary source exercise”, https://umb.libguides.com/c.php?g=1014687&p=7356 867. PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 15 rev. 4/30/20
Date Topic Description Discussion: Progress towards preliminary findings May 6 Lecture #14 – Reading: Simulation Stokey and Zeckhauser, Chapter 6, “Simulation”. [ONLINE] Desai, Chapter 1, “Public Policy Inquiry and Simulations”, pp. 1 – 13. doi: 10.1007/978-1- 4614-1665-4_1. Kiel, D. 2006. A Primer for Agent-Based Modeling in Public Administration: Exploring Complexity in “Would-Be” Administrative Worlds. Public Administration Quarterly 29(3): 268 – 296. Schelling, T.C. 1971. Dynamic Models of Segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1(2): 143 – 186. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794. Spadero, Chapter 4, “Microsimulation of Health Care Policies”, p. 113 – 147. Discussion: Progress towards preliminary findings Final paper: Due Friday, May 24 May 13 Lecture #15 – Reading: Community- Johnson, Chapter 1, “Community-Based Operations engaged Research: Introduction, Theory and Applications”, operations p. 3 – 36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0806-2_1. research Johnson, M.P., Midgley, G. and G. Chichirau. 2018. [NO CLASS Emerging Trends and New Frontiers in MEETING. Community Operational Research. European Students will post Journal of Operational Research 268(3): 1178 - two questions 1191. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.032. about CBOR to the Blackboard Ferretti, V. and E. Gandino. 2018. Co-Designing the discussion board. Solution Space for Rural Regeneration in a New Prof. Johnson will World Heritage Site: A Choice Experiments respond to a Approach. European Journal of Operational select group of Research 268(3): 1077 – 1091. doi: question via a 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.003. video posted to Assignment #5 (Preliminary findings) graded and returned Blackboard.] May 20 Final paper presentations Final papers due Sunday, May 24 at midnight PPOL-G 631 Research Methods II syllabus 16 rev. 4/30/20
You can also read