Consumer eye movement patterns on yellow pages advertising

Page created by Jimmy Logan
 
CONTINUE READING
Consumer eye movement patterns
              on yellow pages advertising
                                    Gerald L. Lohse
        Nelson Peltz Term Assistant Professor of Operations and Information Management
                      The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
                     Department of Operations and Information Management
                               1319 Steinberg Hall - Dietrich Hall
                            Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6366
                                 office phone: (215) 898-8541
                                      fax: (215) 898-3664
                               e-mail: lohse@wharton.upenn.edu

                                       October 3, 1996

           Consumer eye movement patterns on Yellow Pages advertising
                  Journal of Advertising. 26(1), 61-73, (1997)

                                      Acknowledgments
I am grateful to David Fay, Kathryn Dobroth, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful
comments and suggestions. I also thank GTE Laboratories in Waltham, MA for funding this
research.
Consumer eye movement patterns on yellow pages advertising

ABSTRACT
    Process tracing data help understand how yellow pages advertisement characteristics

influence consumer information processing behavior.     A laboratory experiment collected eye

movement data while consumers chose businesses from phone directories.          Consumers scan

listings in alphabetic order. Their scan is not exhaustive. As a result, some ads are never seen.

Consumers noticed over 93% of the quarter page display ads but only 26% of the plain listings.

Consumers perceived color ads before ads without color, noticed more color ads than non-color

ads and viewed color ads 21% longer than equivalent ads without color. Users viewed 42% more

bold listings than plain listings. Consumers spent 54% more time viewing ads they end up

choosing which demonstrates the importance of attention on subsequent choice behavior.
INTRODUCTION

    In 1992, yellow pages directories were a $9.4 billion dollar information services business that

reached 98% of American households (Mangel 1992). It is the fourth largest advertising medium

in the United States after television, newspaper, and direct mail (Peabody 1991). Consumers

choose from over 6,300 directories nationwide (Meffert 1991). All demographic groups use

phone directories nearly 2 times per week (Mangel 1992).           The Yellow Pages Publishers

Association reports that there are more than 46 million references to the yellow pages daily

(YPPA 1992). Phone directories provide an essential link between a business and a customer by

offering information at the moment the consumer is willing to buy. Sixty percent of those who

pick up the yellow pages make an immediate purchase (Mangel 1992). Obviously, the yellow

pages are an important advertising medium for local businesses.

    Yellow pages ads also represent a significant cost to businesses. A typical, non-color,

quarter page ad in a midwestern metropolitan telephone directory with a circulation of one million

costs $10,344 per year (YPPA 1992). A color ad costs approximately 50% more. Further,

yellow pages ads represent a fixed cost that must be paid monthly. Unlike newspaper ads that can

be changed daily, yellow pages ads can only be changed once a year. Thus, it is extremely

important for advertisers to have objective, neutral, third-party research that identifies the

effectiveness of particular advertisement characteristics.

    Yellow pages research typically examines factors that influence why people choose one

business over another (Berdie 1992, Kelly & Hoel 1991, Butler & Abernethy 1994).               Ad

characteristics examined include: size, color, page position, location, amount of information in

the ad, whether the ad listed brand names, whether the ad had a business slogan, whether the ad

contained graphics, and hours of operation. By systematically controlling the design of ads,

                                                                                                 1
researchers infer which factors influenced decision behavior.

    The information content of an ad is one of the most important factors in attracting customers

(Berdie 1992, Kelly & Hoel 1991). The information in the ad must convince the consumer to

purchase from the business by emphasizing information consumers need to make their purchasing

decision. Other effects that do not seem to involve information directly, like the size of an ad, are

probably best understood in information terms as well. A business that can afford to buy a large

ad can be inferred, although not without error, to be stable, prosperous, reliable, have a wide

selection, and so forth. However, there are limits to what can be inferred from the choices people

make. For example, if a particular characteristic of an ad does not seem to influence choice, we

do not know whether people fail to notice it, or whether they notice it, but do not think that

particular characteristic matters.   Knowing which is true is important because they suggest

different tactics for improving the impact of ads.

    A more direct way of discovering how people acquire information from a phone directory

involves recording a person's eye movements as they scan the yellow pages. Eye movement data

provide a detailed reflection of cognitive information processing in many different kinds of

displays (Ford et al. 1989; Russo & Rosen 1975, Hill 1989). Eye movement data can distinguish

between noticing an ad but not caring, and failing to notice an ad. However, eye tracking

equipment is expensive ($30,000 to $100,000+). Additionally, the data are time consuming to

analyze because the pixel locations of each of each area of interest must be defined and mapped to

(x,y) eye coordinates. Given considerations regarding time and expense, very few studies use eye

movement data (Hill, 1989; Schmid, 1990; Treistman & Gregg, 1979).

    Anecdotal evidence abounds regarding what advertisement characteristics -- color, copy

content, size and so forth -- influence consumer viewing characteristics. For example, color ads

                                                                                                   2
containing red ink inspired yellow pages marketing claims that, “Red gets read." Conventional

wisdom suggests that large color display ads are more effective than other types of yellow pages

advertisements (Maher 1988). To learn how yellow pages ads capture people's attention, this

study collected eye movement data while consumers chose businesses from yellow pages

directories. The eye movement data show what ad characteristics influence attention. Questions

addressed by this research include: (1) what particular features cause people to notice an ad, (2)

whether people view ads in any particular order, and (3) how viewing time varies as a function of

particular ad features. This research explores these questions to provide some practical and

theoretical insights for yellow pages advertisers and publishers.

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
  Much of the literature on directional media focuses on print advertising in magazines,

catalogs, and newspapers. This section draws upon this research, prior yellow pages research and

underlying principles from psychology to develop some propositions about the factors influencing

consumer attention to yellow pages advertisements.

Attention to ads
    Until the recent advent of spot and process color ads, a color ad in the yellow pages meant

the ad contained red ink. Such ads beg the question, "What can be said about the use of red ink

to catch the consumer’s eye?" Do people notice more red ads than ads without color? For

magazine ads, Valiente (1973) found that after ad size, color was the second most important

factor explaining ad recognition scores. We also know that people perceive some visual features

more readily than others. For example, people detect and organize color in parallel during visual

processing (Kahneman & Henik 1981). Since color facilitates parallel search, it is about three

times faster than other graphic features, such as shape, that require serial search (Treisman 1982).

P1a Yellow pages users are more likely to notice color ads before any other type of ad.

                                                                                                   3
The direct relationship between advertisement size and attention is well documented (Berdie,

1986; Rouse, 1991; Feldman and Halterman, 1963; Valiente, 1973). Larger ads are viewed first.

Other studies have been less sanguine about different benefits for large ads. Edwards (1988)

found that some consumers distrust a business whose advertisement is much larger than the

competitor's advertisement. In two of the four industries in their study, Kelly and Hoel (1991)

found that the larger advertisements were never preferred by student subjects.

P1b Yellow pages users are more likely to notice large ads before small ads.

    Advertisements with graphics influence attention (Raphel 1988). In a study of ads in Life

magazine, Valiente (1973) found that pictorial benefits, number of separate illustrations, and

square inches of illustration explained 10 percent of the variation in Starch's readership scores.

The benefits of pictures in ads also are supported by evidence that suggests visual memory is

better than verbal memory (Shepard, 1967). Using pictures from a yellow pages directory, Lutz

and Lutz (1977) found that concrete interactive images facilitate recall and memory of a brand.

P1c Yellow pages users are more likely to notice ads with graphics before ads without graphics.

Prototypical patterns of eye movements
    People process information using learned spatial patterns. Reading in English begins in the

upper left-hand corner and proceeds from left to right in a top to bottom fashion. Understanding

prototypical patterns for acquiring information helps identify behavior that could alter decision

processes. The American Airlines reservation system, Sabre, provides a classic example of the

effects of scanning order on choice (Phillips & Thomas, 1988). Sabre listed American Airline

flights first. Being first resulted in more bookings. After a 12 year legal battle, Sabre ordered

flights by time of departure with carrier arranged randomly in the event of time ties.

    These prototypical information acquisition patterns have important implications for the

                                                                                                  4
development of future electronic phone directories and perhaps even public policy. Most people

believe that consumers will benefit tremendously from the ability to conduct on-line searches for

businesses that best fit their particular needs. A more likely scenario is that prototypical search

patterns (e.g., alphabetic) direct callers to specific businesses (e.g., Aardvark Gifts). For example,

Rhodes, Teferman, Cook and Schwartz (1979) found that nearness to the headline (e.g., the serial

position) had an impact on recall. Maher (1988) suggests that the most effective placement of a

listing is an early serial position (e.g., "AAA Sports Shop"). Thus, directory publishers may

influence consumer choice behavior by controlling the position of ads on the page.

     In the United States, businesses are in alphabetic order within each business heading. The

strong learned spatial patterns for processing information (e.g., alphabetic and reading order)

suggest that people will first view businesses that have early serial positions.        Jackson and

Parasuraman (1986) reported that more than 50% of the participants in their study examined

alphabetic listings before viewing the large display ads.

P2   Yellow pages users are more likely to view advertisements near the beginning of the

     heading than those near the end of the heading.

Ad viewing time
    Color, graphics, bold font, and ad size help a consumer notice ads in the directory. However,

the most obvious factor influencing viewing time is the copy content of the ad. Berdie and Hauff

(1986) reported that the amount of information in an ad is extremely influential in consumer

choice behavior.    Since consumers are ready to make a purchase, the ad must emphasize

information consumers need to make their purchasing decision. Feldman and Halterman (1963)

claim advertisements with more copy outperform ads with light copy.

     Time spent viewing ads not only demonstrates attention but also may indicate consumer

                                                                                                    5
preferences. Of course, time is not a "causal" variable. It merely indicates the underlying factors

influencing choice. Viewing time per ad integrates many fixations to the same advertisement.

Some of the viewing time differences relate to comparisons of attributes between businesses.

Russo and LeClerc (1994) also discovered that consumers continued to fixate on the product

display after they had announced their choice as a kind of post-choice verification.

P3   Yellow pages users are more likely to spend more time viewing advertisements of

     businesses they end up choosing.

METHODS
Yellow pages directories
    Prior research suggests that the quality of the test materials can influence results (Virzi

1989). Therefore, the 32 directory pages were created to control for layout and design effects

while maintaining realism. The pages were virtually indistinguishable from "real" yellow pages in

terms of fonts, ink, and color except that the pages were printed on slightly heavier weight paper.

Each page represented a typical assortment of advertisements for one business heading: two 1/4

page and two 1/8 page displays ads; two, large, and two, small, in-column ads; five bold listings,

and 35 plain listings. There were eight subject headings: Automobile Repair, Banks, Florists, Gift

Shops, Jewelers, Movers, Pizza, and Sporting Goods. Each of the 48 businesses within each

heading had a real address and phone number corresponding to an actual geographic location but

had an artificial name to reduce demand effects. The 32 directory pages were organized into four

books. Each book contained eight right hand side pages -- one page for each heading. The set of

four books statistically controlled for combinations of layout and design features. These included

ad type, location of display ads on the page, size of ad, color, use of graphics, whether or not a

listing has a bold typeface, serial position of an ad (alphabetic order), and the number of types of

information in the ad (hours, years in business, slogan, brand names, specialties).

                                                                                                  6
Collecting eye movement data
    Saccadic eye movements have two parts: a movement phase ranging from 30 to 120 msec

and a latency phase of 100 to 300 msec. A typical fixation averages 230 msec (Russo 1978). The

Eyegaze System from LC Technologies, Inc. (Fairfax, VA) uses the pupil-center, corneal

reflection method to record saccadic eye movements (Young & Sheena 1975). The Eyegaze

System uses an Intel 80486 computer to operate both the eye tracking system and the application

software simultaneously.    The Eyegaze System collects data at 60 Hz or about every 16.7

milliseconds within an accuracy of 0.25 inches. The minimum fixation duration was 100 msec.

Specialized software generates x, y coordinates, fixation duration, pupil diameter, and eye blinks.

The individual yellow page was mounted on a special holder on the face of the computer screen in

front of the subject. The observer's eye is about 20 inches from the screen page. No attachments

to the head are required.

Participants
    A diverse group of 32 students and staff of a large university volunteered for the study. The

average number of years of education beyond high school was 3.5 with a range of 0 to 11. The

age of participants ranged from 19 to 56. Participants received a payment $10.00 for their

participation in the study. Eight subjects were assigned randomly to each of the four directory

conditions for a total of 32 participants. Because directories were for the Boston suburbs,

subjects who had lived in the Boston area were excluded. Subjects also were screened to insure

that he/she had used or visited a business in each of the eight business headings.

Experimental procedure
   The experiment was conducted separately for each subject in one 60 minute session. First,

subjects practiced using the eye tracking equipment.           Once calibrated, participants read

instructions for the yellow pages choice study. Subjects were instructed to imagine that they had

                                                                                                 7
just moved to Boston and needed to use the yellow pages directory to locate products or services.

For each heading, participants were given a goal (e.g., "You want to purchase flowers for a

friend" or "Your car needs repair"). Participants chose the three businesses for each heading that

they were most likely to patronize. The experimenter recorded the participants' choices in rank

order. After the choices were made for a particular heading, the experimenter mounted another

individual yellow page into the special holder on the face of the computer screen. The procedure

continued until each subject made a total of 24 choices (8 headings x 3 choices per heading).

After completing the task for all business headings, subjects completed a questionnaire.

Experimental design
   A factorial design examines all possible combinations of color, graphic, types of information,

bold fonts, and ad size for each ad. Such designs require a large amount of time and resources to

create many different versions of each ad. To reduce costs, the current study used a fractional

factorial design examining only a portion of these factorial combinations. The unbalanced design

permits ANOVA estimation of all main effects and some two-way interaction effects with

Heading and Chosen. However, other interaction effects are not estimable. The fractional

factorial design used least-squares means to test various treatment effects. Least square means

are simply estimators of the class or subclass marginal means that would be expected had the

design been balanced with all covariates at their mean value (Searle, Speed, & Milliken, 1980).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
   Figure 1 familiarizes the reader with the eye fixation data. Each circle represents a fixation.

The area of the circle codes fixation duration; the larger the circle the longer the subject looked at

that area. Lines connecting fixations show the subject's scan path. A large square shows the first

fixation. Figure 1 shows a serial scan of the alphabetic listings of subject 29 for the heading

Banks. She first viewed the bold listing for American Savings Bank. The two large quarter page

                                                                                                    8
display ads on the right were not viewed until after all the listing were scanned. Collectively, the

statistical analyses examined the effects of advertisement features on attention to ads, search

patterns, and viewing time. Table 1 describes the variables used in the eye fixation data analysis.

Attention to ads
    Figure 2 shows the percentage of ads noticed for each ad category. Noticed ads had at least

one eye fixation. Subjects noticed 93% of the large display ads but only 26% of the plain listings.

This effect is primarily a function of size. The larger the ad, the more likely people notice the ad.

    A multivariate ANOVA model examined what particular features cause people to notice

display ads. There were 32 display ads (8 headings x 4 display ads per heading) that could be

noticed by each of the 32 subjects for a total of 1,024 observations. The main effect for color was

significant [F(1,973)=7.07; p=.0080]. A statistical comparison of least squares means shows that

people noticed color ads more than ads without color (92% versus 84%). Thus, color ads lower

the visual search cost by making target information more noticeable. There were no significant

differences for ads with and without graphics. However, subjects noticed 96% of the ads with

graphics. The lack of a difference between ads with and without graphics might be a ceiling

effect. Thus, it is difficult to determine whether a display ad with graphics would be noticed more

than an equivalent display ad without graphics.

Prototypical patterns of eye movements
    This set of analyses examines whether people view ads in any particular order. For example,

are listings viewed in alphabetic order? Are color ads viewed first? Search pattern is indicted by

the fixation number sequence. Fixations were numbered serially from 1 to n. The average value

of the fixation number indicates the relative order people viewed an ad. Serial position of each

business corresponds to the alphabetic order of each listing on a page. There are 48 serial

positions on each directory page. The data collection program numbers each fixation on a page in

                                                                                                        9
consecutive order. Average fixation number on a business indicates search order.

    There was a significant correlation between the serial position of a business and average

fixation number (r = .7065, p = .0001). Figure 3 presents a scatter plot of these data with a

regression line depicting trend. The simple regression explains 49% of the variation in average

fixation number. Clearly, people scan listings in the phone directory in alphabetic order.

    A separate analysis examined search effects for display ads. The ANOVA for search patterns

is based on 11,231 fixations for the display ads actually viewed on each of the eight headings by

the 32 subjects. The fixations not on display ads were on the listings, in-column ads, filler,

headings, index, and margins or were off the page. A multivariate ANOVA model found that

consumers viewed color ads before ads without color [F(1,11183)=13.77, p
appears that subjects compared other businesses to their initial choice to justify their selection.

Ad viewing time
    Viewing time measured the total time (in seconds) a subject viewed an ad. There were 348

possible ads (8 headings x 48 ads per heading) for each of 32 subjects for a potential of 12,288

observations. Of course, subjects did not view every ad. Thus, the ANOVA examines how total

viewing time varied as a function of particular features on the 4,886 ads actually viewed. Chosen

ads were any of the three businesses participants chose to call. On average, subjects spent about

one minute per page to make their three choices. Viewing time for individual pages ranged from

19 to 188 seconds.

    Ad size had the largest effect on viewing time [F(1,4758)=137.90, p < .0001]. On a per ad

basis, people spent more time viewing large ads. However, on a per page basis, people spent

almost as much time per page viewing plain listings (Table 2). Thus, viewing time is a function of

the number of ads per page as well as the amount of time per ad. Figure 4 graphs the relationship

between fixations per ad and ad size. The straight line is a base line reference of one fixation per

square inch. Bars note a 95% confidence interval for number of fixations around each of the six

ad size means. All ads except large display ads had at least one fixation per square inch. Small

display ads (five square inches) maximized the number of fixations per square inch. Figure 4

demonstrates limits to the benefits of large ads. Figure 5 graphs seconds of viewing time per ad.

Larger ads command a longer viewing time.

    Business choice had the next largest effect. People spent 54% more time viewing ads they

end up choosing [F(1,4758)=64.95, p < .0001]. A significant interaction effect between ad

category and whether an ad was chosen (Figure 6) explains the viewing time effect. People spent

more time viewing display ads and in-column ads for businesses they chose to patronize. Bold,

                                                                                                      11
plain and anchor listings did not have any significant difference in the amount of time spent

viewing chosen ads and ads not chosen.         The information content of the ads explains this

interaction effect.   Display ads and in-column ads varied the number of additional types of

information. Bold, plain and anchor listings do not contain any additional types of information.

Subjects could only make a decision to patronize businesses with bold or plain listings on the basis

of the name and address. As a result, the additional viewing time can be attributed to the

evaluation of the additional information in the display and in-column ads.

    The type of heading significantly influenced the amount of viewing time per ad. Subjects

spent more time viewing ads for Banks and Movers than for Pizza [F(7,4758)=3.38, p < .0013].

It seems reasonable to assume that subjects spent more time viewing headings less familiar to

them. Also subjects may spend more time viewing headings whose products or services have a

higher value (e.g. cost of pizza versus cost of moving service). There was also a significant

interaction between Heading and Chosen [F(7,4758)=2.84, p < .0059]. Subjects spent more time

viewing ads for businesses they end up choosing for all business headings except automobiles.

    Color had a significant main effect on viewing time. Color not only captured initial viewing

attention but also resulted in additional viewing time. People spent 21% more time viewing a

color ad than the equivalent ad without color [F(1,4758)=3.93, p < .0476]. For one heading,

Banks, people spent 100% more time viewing color ads [F(7,4758)=4.76, p < .0001]. This is

significantly above the 21% average increase for color ads. No other business heading had a

significant amount of additional viewing time beyond the 21% average increase for color ads.

    There was also a marginally significant main effect for ads with graphics [F(1,4758)=3.15, p

< .0759]. Subjects spent 13% more time viewing ads with graphics. Unlike color ads, ads with

graphics did not have an interaction effect with different business headings.

                                                                                                 12
Bold listings capture attention by making ads easier to read. People viewed 42% more bold

listings than plain listings. The number of fixations on bold listings (2.0) did not differ statistically

from the number on plain listings (1.7). Bold listings did improve the likelihood of being chosen.

     The alphabetic order of the listing did not influence average viewing time per ad. Subjects

did not spend more time viewing ads they saw earlier in the listing than those viewed later in the

listing. Figure 7 shows the significant effect of the number of types of additional information on

viewing time [F(5,4778)=3.83, p < .0018]. Viewing time increases as the number of types of

additional information increases from zero to three. Viewing time decreases with any further

increase in the amount of information per ad. Too much information in an ad decreases viewing

time. Ad size mediates the effect of the amount of information in an ad. Too much information in

a small area makes the ad difficult to read.

LIMITATIONS
   It is important to note several limitations of this research. First, the finding that subjects only

viewed 26% of the plain listings is lower than we might expect for the general population.

Second, the sample is skewed towards people with higher levels of education.                 Additional

research would determine how well the eye movement findings generalize to different segments of

yellow pages users. Third, the sample size is small. Additional data are needed to determine

whether the results will hold for a more heterogeneous sample. Fourth, the experimental design

can not test some higher order interactions (e.g., heading x graph x color). Thus, the results must

be interpreted subject to these caveats.

     Ideally, the study would have used a local, phone directory and local residents with

knowledge about the local suburban area, roads names, and driving conditions as well as a large

sample size like the study by a major phone directory publisher that used 192 home owners

                                                                                                      13
recruited from a local shopping mall. However, the equipment is not mobile and very expensive

($30,000-$100,000+). Thus, it is not very feasible to conduct the study at a shopping mall.

Nevertheless, the current study replicates not only the significance but also the size of the effect

for every variable, except location, in the study noted above by a major phone directory publisher.

Thus, these results should generalize to other phone directory users.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
   The results from this yellow pages study are consistent with previous findings on print

advertising in magazines, catalogs, and newspapers.        Ad size, graphics, color and copy all

influence attention to advertisements (Hornik 1980; Rossiter 1981, 1988; Schindler 1986;

Valiente 1973). In the current study, information content of the ad had a large effect on attention

and choice. People spent 54% more time viewing ads they eventually chose because display and

in-column ads contain additional information not found in plain listings.        Ads with a high

information content were viewed before ads with a low information content; however, too much

information on an ad decreased viewing time.

    Ad size also influenced attention. In general, the larger the ad, the more likely subjects will

noticed the ad. Subjects noticed 93% of the large display ads but only 26% of the plain listings.

The density of fixations is another measure of attention. Small display ads (five square inches)

had the greatest density of fixations per square inch of space.

    Color ads and ads with graphics capture attention. Subjects noticed more color ads than ads

without color (92% versus 84%) and subjects viewed color ads before ads without color.

Subjects viewed color ads 21% longer than equivalent ads without color. Subjects also viewed

96% of graphic ads. However, unlike color ads, graphics ads did not capture initial consumer

attention.   Additional research will help understand if graphics are more effective for some

                                                                                                 14
business headings than others as well as if the information content of the graphic influence its

effectiveness.

     The position of an ad on the page had a large effect on whether people view a business, even

though the position says nothing informative about the business. Position matters because people

scan ads on a page in alphabetic order and their scan is not exhaustive; as a result, people never

read some ads. Aardvark Gifts is better than Zodiac Gifts, if the ads are otherwise equal (same

size, same page, same font, etc.).       Unfortunately production layout of yellow pages cannot

guarantee a certain position on the page. Further it is not know whether the serial position effect

is valid across multiple pages in a business heading.

     In a previous study, travel time to a business had the largest effect on consumer choice

(Jackson and Parasuraman 1986). In the current study, we screened subjects to insure location

would not affect consumer choices as much. Subjects were not familiar with the Boston suburbs,

roads names, or driving conditions and made their selections without local maps. As a result,

subjects may have paid more attention to the information found in display and in-column ads and

less attention to plain listings that were distinguishable only on the basis of their locations.

     The lack of consumer focus on business location emulates yellow pages usage for 42 million

residents that move each year -- 14.8 million of them to a different county or state (US Bureau of

Census 1995, p32 Table 33). While this market niche only represents a small segment of the US

population, people that move to a new city make many major purchasing decisions over a very

short period of time. Further, the newly mobile market segment are heavy users of the yellow

pages and tend to be more affluent then the general population (Butler and Abernethy 1994).

While the results indicate how newly mobile consumers would use the yellow pages, they

generally underestimate the effect of location for the typical consumer.

                                                                                                   15
The paper adds to the existing body of literature on print advertising and validates the

previous findings regarding size of ad, color, and information content. The paper also highlights

the importance of serial position in an alphabetic listing on choice. The unique contribution of this

research lies in the novel use of eye tracking equipment. Just as computers have rapidly increased

in power and performance, eye tracking equipment has also improved significantly. Contemporary

eye tracking equipment no longer requires bite bars and other attachments to the head. Current

eye tracking systems are able to detect regions as small as 1.5 square centimeters. Thus, it seems

time to reevaluate the importance of eye tracking equipment as a tool for print advertising

research.

    Two recent papers also tout the advantages of eye tracking data in improving catalog sales

by improving the customers’eye flow (Hill, 1989; Schmid, 1990). The use of eye movement data

distinguishes between noticing a particular characteristic of an ad or not. Whether or not an ad

was noticed suggests different tactics for improving the impact of ads. Ads that are not noticed

require features to attract the readers attention, whereas noticed ads that did not influence choice

require better copy.

    These results also have some practical implications for pricing decisions regarding ads in

phone directories, marketing of directory advertisements, and the graphic layout for paper and

electronic phone directories. For example, current directory practices place large display ads at

the front of a heading and reward senior clients with better serial position in a heading. Since

consumers direct more attention to ads at the beginning of a listing, what is it worth to be first?

By understanding how consumers view businesses in the yellow pages, the research provides

insights about training the sales force (Sales), providing guidelines and recommendations for

advertisers (Advertising), improving the graphic layout of yellow pages directories (Production),

                                                                                                  16
recommending pricing strategies based on perceived value (Marketing), and designing future

electronic yellow pages (Product Development).

    The future of the yellow pages relies in electronic technology such as CD-ROM, interactive

television, and multimedia services. As phone companies develop new information products and

services, knowledge about the effect of attention and information acquisition strategies can be

used to design systems that influence consumer choice. Thus, information acquisition patterns

also have implications for the interface design of future electronic phone directory services.

                                                                                                 17
Table 1: Variables included in the data analysis
             Variable          Description
             subject           1 to 32
              book             1 to 4 - each book contained different ad positions
             heading           text version of business category name
                               auto, banks, floral, gift, jewel, movers, pizza, sports
                  adcat        ad categories for large and small display ads, large and small
                               in-column ads, bold and plain listings, and anchor listings for the large
                               and small display ads
                  bold         0=plain listing; 1=bold listing
                  sbus         serial position of ad on the page (1-48)
                  asize        ad size in square inches
                               .167=plain listing
                               .375=bold listing
                               1=small in-column
                               3=large in-column
                               5=small display
                               20=large display
                  sum          number of types of information in the ad (range=0-5)
                               information types: hours, years in business, slogan, brand
                               names, specialties
                color          0=black, 1=at least some red
              graphic          0=no graphic, 1=graphic
               chosen          0 if ad was not chosen; 1 if ad was 1st, 2nd or 3rd choice
              fix_num          ordinal number of each fixation on a page (1=first to N=last)
              seconds          fixation duration in seconds

Table2: Viewing time per ad
                     Number          Percent of        Ads viewed        Seconds        Seconds
   Ad Type           per page        ads viewed         per page          per ad        per page
 Large Display             2             93.0                1.9            6.4           12.2
 Small Display             2             88.5                1.8            4.4            7.5
Large In-column            2             83.6                1.7            4.2            7.1
Small In-column            2             58.2                1.2            2.2            2.6
     Bold                  9             37.4                3.4            1.7            5.8
     Plain                35             26.4                9.3            1.2           11.2
    TOTAL                 52             36.7              19.1             2.4           46.4

                                                                                                           18
Figure 1 Example of serial scan of alphabetic listings.
                                                          19
Figure 2: Percent of ads noticed by ad category
                                         Plain                               26
                                         Bold                                          37
  Small In-column                                                                                          58
 Large In-column                                                                                                                84
             Small Display                                                                                                           89
            Large Display                                                                                                                 93

                                                   0                20                 40                60                80              100
                                                                                             Percent

                                        Figure 3: Relationship between serial position of business
                                                      and average fixation number
                   70
Average fixation

                   60
   number

                   50
                   40                                                                                 y = 0.33x + 51.6
                   30                                                                                   R2 = 0.4992
                   20
                   10
                    0
                                 0                         10               20                   30                  40              50
                                                                          Serial position of business

                                               Figure 4: Fixations per ad as a function of ad size
                                                        with 95% confindence intervals

                                        20.0
                     Fixations per ad

                                        15.0

                                        10.0

                                         5.0

                                         0.0
                                               0       2        4   6       8     10        12   14      16     18    20
                                                                        Ad Size in square inches

                                                                                                                                           20
Figure 5: Viewing time as a function of ad category
                8
                6
   Seconds

                4
                2
                0
                      Large    Small   Large  Small                  Bold           Plain     Large      Small
                      Display Display Column Column                 Listing        Listing    Anchor    Anchor

Figure 6: Ad x Chosen means with 95% confidence intervals
                9
                8
                7
                6
     Seconds

                5
                4
                3
                2
                1
                0
                      Large        Small      Large       Small       Bold           Plain      Large     Small
                     Display       Display   Column      Column      Listing        Listing    Anchor     Anchor

                                                 Ad is not chosen     Ad is chosen

                                   Figure 7: Viewing time with 95% confidence intervals
               3.6
               3.0
 Seconds

               2.4
               1.8
               1.2
               0.6
               0.0
                               0             1              2                  3               4            5
                                                      Number of types of information

                                                                                                                   21
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Berdie, Douglas R. (1992). The Yellow Pages Report: A comprehensive guide for advertisers.
       Consumer Review Systems, Inc.; 905 Raymond Avenue; St. Paul, MN 55114.
Berdie, Douglas. R. & Hauff, Elaine M. (1986). The yellow pages Report: A comprehensive
       guide for advertisers. Consumer Review Systems, Inc.; 905 Raymond Avenue; St. Paul,
       MN 55114.
Butler, Daniel D. & Abernethy, Avery M. (1994). Consumer information needs for attorney and
       accountant yellow pages advertising. Journal of Services Marketing, 8(2), 46-56.
Edwards, David (1988). Get the most from the yellow pages, Graphic Arts Monthly, Sep, 100.
Feldman, Sidney P. & Halterman, J. C. (1963). Consumer use of the yellow pages in Kansas,
      unpublished memo for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company.
Ford J. Kevin, Schmitt, Neal, Schechtman, Susan L., Hults, Brian M., Doherty, Mary L. (1989).
      Processing tracing methods: contributions, problems, and neglected research questions.
      Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 43, 75-117.
Hill, Lawson T. (1989). Going with eye flow: How eye-movement tests work and how to use
       them to improve your catalog's eye flow. Catalog Age, April, 83-86.
Hornik, Jacob (1980). Quantitative analysis of visual perception of printed advertisements.
       Journal of Advertising Research, 20, 41-48.
Jackson, Ralph W. & Parasuraman, A. (1986). The yellow pages as an advertising tool for small
       businesses. American Journal of Small Business, 10(4), 29-35.
Kahneman, Daniel, & Henik, Avishai. (1981) Perceptual Organization and attention. In Micheal
       Kubovy and James R. Pomerantz, editors, Perceptual Organization, 181-211; Hillsdale,
       NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kelly, Kathleen J. & Hoel, Robert F. (1991). The impact of size, color, and copy quantity on
       yellow pages advertising effectiveness. Journal of Small Business Management, October,
       64-71.
Lutz, Kathy A. & Lutz, Richard J. (1977). Effects of interactive imagery on learning:
      Application to advertising. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 4, 493-498.
Mangel, Amy (1992). An old industry finally grows up. AdWeek, Aug 10, 14(32), 30-36.
Maher, Barry (1988). Getting the most from your yellow pages advertising, New York:
      American Management Association.
Meffert, Susan D. (1991). It's not all yellow our there: What other colors are in the directory
      spectrum? Link, May/June. 9-13, 34-37.
Raphel, Murray (1988). Ad techniques: Pictures urge the reader to stop, look, listen. Bank
       Marketing, August, 32-33.
Rhodes, Edward W., Teferman, Norman B., Cook, Elizabeth & Schwartz, David (1979). T-
       scope tests of yellow pages advertising, Journal of Advertising Research, 28(4), 429-440.
Rouse, Ruby A. (1991). Yellow pages advertising: an empirical analysis of attributes
       contributing to consumer interest, liking, and preference, Journal of Professional Services
       Marketing, 6, 35-44.
Rossiter, John R. (1981). Predicting Starch Scores. Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 63-68.
Rossiter, John R. (1988). The increase in magazine ad readership. Journal of Advertising
       Research, 35-39.
Russo, J. Edward & Rosen, Larry D. (1975). An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice.
       Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 267-276.

                                                                                                22
Russo, J. Edward (1978). Eye fixations can save the world: A critical evaluation and a
       comparison between eye fixations and other information processing methodologies. In H.
       K. Hunt (Ed). Advances in consumer research (Volume 5), 561-570, Ann Arbor, MI:
       Association for Consumer Research.
Russo, J. Edward & Leclerc, France (1994). An eye fixation analysis of choice processes for
       consumer nondurables. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 274-290.
Peabody, Patricia S. (1991). Yellow journalism: Advertising trade press' view of the yellow
       pages industry, Link, Oct. 25-29, 42-45.
Phillips, Carolyn & Thomas, Paulette (1988, August 19). Texas Air asks transportation agency
       to examine rivals' reservation systems. Wall Street Journal, p13.
Schindler, Pamela S. (1986). Color and contrast in magazine advertising. Psychology and
       Marketing, 3, 69-78.
Schmid, Jack What eye tracking can do for your catalog. Target Marketing. 1990; 13(10):63-64.
Searle, S. R., Speed, F. M., and Milliken, G. A. (1980). Populations marginal means in the linear
               model: an alternative to least squares means. The American Statistician, 34, 216-
               221.
Shepard, Roger N. (1967). Recognition memory for words sentences and pictures. Journal of
       Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
Treisman, Anne (1982) Perceptual Grouping and Attention in Visual Search for Features and for
       Objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8,
       194-214.
Treistman, Joan and Gregg, John P. Visual, verbal, and sales responses to print ads. Journal of
       Advertising Research. 1979; 19(4):41-47.
US Bureau of Census. (1995). Statistical Abstract of the United States (115th Edition).
       Washington, D.C.
Valiente, Rafael (1973). Mechanical correlates of ad recognition. Journal of Advertising
       Research, 13 (March), 13-18.
Virzi, Robert A. (1989). What can you learn from a low-fidelity prototype? Proceedings of the
       Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 224-228.
Young, Laurence R. & Sheena, David (1975). Survey of eye movement recording methods.
       Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 7(5), 397-429.
YPPA (1992). Yellow pages and the media mix Troy MI: Yellow Pages Publishers Association.

                                                                                              23
You can also read