Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2019, PP 1-9
Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological
Structuralism
Paul C. Mocombe
West Virginia State University, Mocombeian Foundation, Inc.
*Corresponding Author: Paul C. Mocombe, West Virginia State University, Mocombeian
Foundation, Inc, Email Id: pmocombe@mocombeian.com
ABSTRACT
This work highlights the nature and origin of consciousness in the universe according to Paul C. Mocombe’s
structurationist theory of phenomenological structuralism. The author, building on the quantum computation
of ORCH-OR theory and the multiverse ideas of Haitian ontology/epistemology and quantum mechanics
abductively posits that consciousness is a fifth force of nature, a quantum material substance/energy,
psychion, the phenomenal property of which is recycled/entangled/superimposed throughout the multiverse
and becomes embodied via the microtubules of brains and multiple worlds. It is manifested in simultaneous,
entangled, superimposed, and interconnecting material resource frameworks, multiple worlds, as praxis or
practical consciousness of organic life, which in-turn becomes the phenomenal properties of material
(subatomic particle energy, psychion) consciousness that is recycled throughout the multiverses.
Keywords: Structurationism, Praxis, Panpsychism, Social Class Language Game, Phenomenological
Structuralism, ORCH-OR Theory
INTRODUCTION worlds. The academic literature “describes three
possibilities regarding the origin and place of
This work highlights the nature and origin of consciousness in the universe: (A) as an
consciousness in the universe according to Paul C. emergent property of complex brain neuronal
Mocombe‟s (2016, 2017, 2018) structurationist computation, (B) as spiritual quality of the
theory of phenomenological structuralism. The
universe, distinct from purely physical actions,
author, building on the quantum computation of
and (C) as composed of discrete „proto-
ORCH-OR theory and the multiverse ideas of conscious‟ events acting in accordance with
Haitian ontology / epistemology and quantum physical laws not yet fully understood”
mechanics abductively posits that consciousness is (Hameroff and Penrose, 2014, pg. 70). The
a fifth force of nature, a quantum material latter position, (C), represents the ORCH-OR
substance/energy, psychion, the phenomenal (“orchestrated objective reduction”) theory of
property of which is superimposed, entangled, and Stuart Hameroff and Roger Penrose (2014),
recycled throughout the multiverses and becomes which includes aspects of (A) and (B), and posits
embodied via the microtubules of brains and that “consciousness consists of discrete moments,
multiple worlds. It is manifested in simultaneous, each an „orchestrated‟ quantum-computational
entangled, superimposed, and interconnecting
process terminated by… an action [,objective
material resource frameworks, multiple worlds, as reduction or rooted in quantum aspects of the
praxis or practical consciousness of aggregated fine structure of space—time geometry, this
organic life, which in-turn, following death or being coupled to brain neuronal processes via
disaggregation, becomes the phenomenal properties
microtubules” (pg. 70). In this view, the
of material (subatomic particle energy, psychion) understanding is that a proto-conscious
consciousness that is recycled throughout the experience existed in the universe, panpsychism,
multiverses. and as a result of emergent structures of the brain it
BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM (proto-conscious experience, psychion) became
embodied and evolved as a result of quantum
Consciousness here refers to subjective Awareness neuronal computations of “brains.” Paul C.
of phenomenal experiences (ideology, language, Mocombe‟s (2016, 2017, 2018) structurationist
self, feelings, choice, control of voluntary sociology, phenomenological structuralism,
behavior, thoughts, etc.) of internal and external which attempts to resolve the structure/agency
Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology V1 ● I1 ● 2019 1Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism
problematic of the social sciences, builds on the of an individual actors‟ (mental) stance/analytics
ORCH-OR theory and panpsychism of (Martin Heidegger‟s term) vis-à-vis three types of
Hameroff and Penrose, while holding on to the structures/systems of signification amidst the
multiverse hypothesis of quantum mechanics practical consciousness associated with societal
and Haitian ontology/epistemology, which the structural reproduction and differentiation (the
authors reject because it is not “a more down-to- social system): 1) the (chemical, biological, and
earth viewpoint” (Hameroff and Penrose, 2014, physiological) drives (forms of sensibility and
pg. 51). For Mocombe (2016, 2017, 2018), understanding) of the body and brain (the
quantum superposition, entanglement, and biological system), 2) impulses or phenomenal
evidence in Haitian Vodou of spirit possession, properties of residual past consciousnesses or
which represent ancestors from a parallel world, recycled / entangled / superimposed subatomic /
Vilokan, of the earth‟s of which we ought to chemical particles encapsulated in and as the
pattern our behaviors and structures, are neuronal energies of the brain via microtubules
grounding proofs for the acceptance of the (the physical system), 3) and actions or practical
multiple worlds hypothesis of quantum consciousnesses resulting from the deferment of
mechanics. Within the latter hypothesis, the meaning in ego-centered linguistic and symbolic
understanding is that “each possibility in a communicative discourse (the linguistic system).
superposition evolves to form its own universe,
Generally speaking, consciousnesses, actions
resulting in an infinite multitude of coexisting
(practical consciousness), learning, and
„parallel‟ worlds. The stream of consciousness
development within Mocombe‟s phenomenological
of the observer is supposed somehow to „split‟,
structural ontology are the product of the
so that there is one in each of the worlds-at least
embodiment of the phenomenal properties of
in those worlds for which the observer remains
recycled/entangled/superimposed subatomic
alive and conscious. Each instance of the
neuronal energies/chemicals, psychion, of the
observer‟s consciousness experiences a separate
multiverse objectified in the space-time of
independent world, and is not directly aware of
multiverses via the aggregated body and the
any of the other worlds” (Hameroff and
microtubules of the brain. Once objectified and
Penrose, 2014, pg. 50). It is within this multiple
embodied the phenomenal properties of the
world‟s hypothesis that Mocombe constitutes
neuronal energies/chemicals encounter the
the notion of consciousness in the universe
space-time of physical worlds via a
according to his theory of phenomenological
transcendental subject of consciousnesses (the
structuralism. For Mocombe, consciousness is a
aggregation of a universal-self superimposed
fifth force of nature, a quantum material
and entangled across the multiple worlds of the
substance/energy, psychion, the phenomenal
multiverse) and the drives and sensibilities of
property of which is recycled/entangled
the aggregated body and brain in reified
/superimposed throughout the multiverse and
structures of signification, language, ideology,
becomes embodied via the microtubules of
ideological apparatuses, and communicative
brains. It is manifested in simultaneous,
discourse defined and determined by other
entangled, superimposed, and interconnecting
beings that control the resources (economics),
material resource frameworks as embodied
and modes of distributing them, of the material
praxis or practical consciousness, which in-turn
world required for physical survival in space-
becomes the phenomenal properties of material
time. The Heidegger an (mental) stances /
(subatomic particle energy, psychion)
analytics, “ready-to-hand,” “unready-to-hand,”
consciousness that is recycled/entangled
and “present-at-hand,” which emerge as a result
/superimposed throughout the multiverses.
of conflict between the embodied transcendental
THEORY AND METHOD ego vis-à-vis its different systems, 1) the
sensibilities and (chemical, biological, and
Structurationist sociology synthesizes structure physiological) drives of the body and brain, 2)
and agency via the concept of praxis or practical drives/impulses of embodied residual memories
consciousness; accounting for agency or practical or phenomenal properties of past recycled
consciousness via the actions associated with /entangled/superimposed subatomic/chemical
structural reproduction and differentiation within a particles, 3) the actions produced via the body in
particular material resource framework (Crothers, relation to the indeterminacy/deferment of
2003; Ortner, 1984). Building on structurationist
meaning of linguistic and symbolic signifiers as
sociology, Mocombe argues that the “moments,
they appear to individuated consciousnesses in
or movements, which escape from the compound of ego-centered communicative discourse, 4) and
socially constructed identifications” are the product
2 Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology V1 ● I1 ● 2019Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism
the dialectical and differentiating effects, i.e., deferment of meaning, along with the
structural reproduction and differentiation, of differentiating logic or class divisions of the
the structures of signification, social class social relations of production, which produces
language game, of those who control the the variability of actions and practices in
economic materials (and their distribution, i.e., cultures, social structures, or social systems. All
mode of production) of a world are the origins four types of actions are always present and
of practical consciousnesses. All four types of manifested in a social structure to some degree
actions, the drives and sensibilities of the body contingent upon the will and desires of the
and brain, drives or phenomenal properties of economic social class that controls the material
embodied recycled/entangled/superimposed past resource framework through its body (practical
consciousnesses, structural reproduction/ consciousness), language/symbols, ideology,
differentiation stemming from the mode of ideological apparatuses, and social relations of
production, and deferential actions arising from production. They choose, amidst the class
the deferment of meaning in ego-centered division of the social relations of production,
communicative discourse via the present-at- what other meaning constitutions and practices are
hand stance/analytic, exist in the material world allowed to manifest themselves in the material
with the social class language game, i.e., the world without facing alienation, marginalization,
physical, mental, emotional, ideological, etc. 5) domination, or death.
powers of those who control the material
Hence, we never experience the things-in-
resource framework as the causative agent for
themselves of the world culturally and historically
individual behaviors. In other words, our
in consciousness. We experience them structurally
(mental) stances in consciousness vis-à-vis the
or relationally, the structure of the conjuncture of
conflict between the (chemical, biological, and
the mode of production, its language, ideology,
physiological) drives and sensibilities of the
ideological apparatuses, etc., and our (mental)
body and brain, (societal) structural
stances/analytics, ready-to-hand, unready-to-hand,
reproduction and differentiation, drives of
present-at-hand, vis-à-vis these things as they
embodied past consciousnesses of recycled /
appear to and in consciousness determine our
entangled/superimposed subatomic/chemical
practical consciousness or behaviors.
particles, and deferential actions arising as a
result of the deferment of meaning in ego- We initially know, experience, and utilize the
centered communicative discourse determines things of and in consciousness in the
the practical consciousness we want to preontological ready-to-hand mode, which is
recursively reorganize and reproduce in the structural and relational. That is, our bodies
material world. The power and power positions encounter, know, experience, and utilize the things
of those who control (via the mode of of the world in consciousness, intersubjectively, via
production, language, ideology, ideological their representation as objects of knowledge, truth,
apparatuses, and communicative discourse) the usage, and experience enflamed and defined in the
resources (and their distribution, i.e., mode of relational logic and practices or language game
production) of a material resource framework, (Wittgenstein‟s term) of the institutions or
and the threat it poses to the ontological security ideological apparatuses of the other beings-of-the-
of an actor, in the end determines what actions material resource framework whose historicity
and identities are allowed to organize and comes before our own and gets reified in and as the
reproduce in the material world without the actions of their bodies, language, ideology,
individual actor/agent facing marginalization or ideological apparatuses, mode of production, and
death. communicative discourse.
It is Being‟s (mental) stance/analytic, “ready-to- This is the predefined phenomenal structural, i.e.,
hand,” “unready-to-hand,” and “present-at- ontological, world we and our bodies are thrown-
hand,” in consciousness vis-à-vis the conflict, or in in coming to be-in-the-world. How an
lack thereof, between the (chemical, biological, embodied-hermeneutically-structured Being as
and physiological) drives and sensibilities of the such solipsistically view, experience,
aggregated body and brain, drives/impulses understand, act, and utilize the predefined
(phenomenal properties) of residual past objects of knowledge, truth, and experienced
consciousnesses of defined by others and their conditions of
recycled/entangled/superimposed subatomic possibilities in consciousness in order to
particles, alternative practices which arise as a formulate their practical consciousness is albeit
result of phenomenological meditation and indeterminate.
Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology V1 ● I1 ● 2019 3Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism
Martin Heidegger in Being in Time is accurate, the unready-to-hand stance in response to those
however, in suggesting that three stances or who they encounter that attempts, present-at-
modes of encounter (Analytic of Dasein), hand, to alter the nature of the dominant social
“presence-at-hand,” “readiness-to-hand,” and class language game they recursively reorganize
“un-readiness-to-hand,” characterizes our views and reproduce as outlined by those in power
of the things of consciousness represented inter positions who are present-at-hand of the
subjectively via bodies, language, ideology, and dominant social class language game. In either
communicative discourse, and subsequently case, not all beings achieve the present-at-hand
determine our practical consciousness or social stance. The latter is the stance of science and
agency. ideologies, which are tautologies when they
profess that their stances represent the nature of
In “ready-to-hand,” which is the preontological
reality as such, and those in power positions,
mode of human existence thrown in the world,
who choose, among a plethora of alternative
we accept and use the things in consciousness
present-at-hand social class language games,
with no conscious experience of them, i.e.,
what alternative practical consciousnesses
without thinking about them or giving them any
outside of their social class language game that
meaning or signification outside of their
are allowed to manifest in the material world.
intended usage. Heidegger‟s example is that of
using a hammer in hammering. We use a DISCUSSION
hammer without thinking about it or giving it
any other condition of possibility outside of its Hence, as outlined above, phenomenological
structuralism posits consciousness to be the by-
intended usage as defined by those whose
historicity presupposes our own. In “present-at- product or evolution of subatomic particles
hand,” which, according to Heidegger, is the unfolding with increasing levels of abstraction
stance of science, we objectify the things of within a material resource framework enflamed
by the mode of production, language, ideology,
consciousness and attempt to determine and
reify their meanings, usage, and conditions of ideological apparatuses, and communicative
possibilities as the nature of reality as such. discourse of bodies recursively reorganizing and
Hence the hammer is intended for hammering reproducing the ideals of the latter factors as
by those who created it as a thing solely meant their practical consciousness. That is to say, the
logical consequence regarding the evolution and
as such.
constitution of the multiverses, and their
The “unready-to-hand” outlook is assumed contents, based on the assumptions of
when something goes wrong in our usage of a superposition, action-at-a-distance, phenomenal
thing of consciousness as defined and properties, and panpsychism of quantum
determined by those who adopt a “present-at- mechanics, for Mocombe, is similar to the
hand” view. As in the case of the hammer, the intersecting worlds theory highlighted in Haitian
unready-to-hand view is assumed when the Vodou, which parallels the physics, “membrane
hammer breaks and we must objectify it, by then theory,” of Lisa Randall and Raman Sundrum
assuming a present-at-hand position, and think (1999). The proposal in keeping with the logic
about it in order to either reconstitute it as a of Haitian Vodou and the “brane theory” of
hammer, or give it another condition of Randall and Sundrum is that there might be an
possibility. Any other condition of possibility additional dimension on the cosmological scale,
that we give the hammer outside of its initial the scale described by general relativity, which
condition of possibility which presupposed our gives rise to four dimensional multiverses
historicity becomes relational, defined in within it. That is to say, our universe is
relation to any of its other conditions of embedded in a vastly bigger five-dimensional
possibilities it may have been given by others space (the four-dimensional space of relativity,
we exist in the world with who either ready-to- plus a fifth dimension for the subatomic forces
hand, unready-to-hand, or present-at-hand including consciousness), a kind of super-
attempts to maintain the social class language universe. Within this super-space, our universe
game of power. In the ready-to-hand stance the is just one of a whole array of co-existing
latter unconsciously practices and attempts to universes (Haitian Vodou only accounts for our
reproduce the social class language game of universe and its parallel), each a separate four-
power by discriminating against and marginalizing dimensional bubble within a wider arena of five-
any other conditions of possibilities of their dimensional space where consciousness (a
social class language as determined by those in subatomic force) is recycled/entangled/
ideological power positions. They may move to superimposed between the five-dimensional
4 Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology V1 ● I1 ● 2019Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism
super-space, i.e., superverses, and their production).
multiverses.
Hence in the end, subject constitution is a
For Mocombe the multiverses originated, from product of conflict and an individual‟s mental
the super-universes, either by fiat or quantum stance, i.e., analytics, vis-à-vis three
fluctuation. They are bosonic forces that were structures/systems of signification and the
brought forth together with fermion counterparts. ability to defer meaning in ego-centered
They are also the primeval pan-psychic fields, communicative discourse stemming from the
stemming from the super-verses, whose fermion social class language game (i.e., language,
can be called a psychion, a particle of consciousness symbols, ideology, ideological apparatuses, and
or proto-consciousness. These have evolved communicative discourse) of those who control
together to produce the four forces of nature, the mode of production of a material resource
electromagnetic force; gravity; the strong nuclear framework. It is the ready-to-hand drives of the
force; and weak nuclear force, in our universe, body and brain, ready-to-hand and present-at-
which in turn produced atoms, molecules, and hand manifestation of past recycled residual
aggregated life endowed (embodied) with the consciousnesses/subatomic particles, the
recycled / entangled / superimposed consciousness present-at-hand phenomenological meditation
and phenomenal properties of the primeval pan- and deferment of meaning that occurs in
psychic fields, psychion, of the superverses and embodied consciousness via language, ideology,
their multiverses (the fifth force of nature). and communicative discourse as reflected in
Subatomic particles, via the Higgs boson diverse individual practices, within the ready-to-
particle, gave rise to carbon atoms, molecules hand, unready-to-hand, and present-at-hand
and chemistry, which gave rise to DNA, differentiating logic or class divisions of the
biological organisms, neurons and nervous social relations of production, which produces
systems, which aggregated into bodies and the variability of actions and practices in
brains that gave rise to the embodiment of cultures, social structures, or social systems. All
preexisting consciousness of the subatomic four types of actions, the (chemical, biological,
particles, bodies, and languages from entangled/ and physiological) drives/impulses of the body
superimposed multiverses. and residual past consciousnesses of subatomic
particles, structural reproduction/differentiation,
In human beings, the indeterminate behavior of
and actions resulting from the deferment of
superimposed and entangled subatomic neuronal
meaning in ego-centered communicative
energies that produced the plethora of
discourse, are always present and manifested in
consciousnesses and languages in the neocortex
a social structure (which is the reified ideology
of brains gave rise to ideologies, which in turn
via ideological apparatuses, their social class
gave rise to ideological apparatuses and
language game, of those who control a material
societies (sociology) under the social class
resource framework) to some degree contingent
language game or language, ideology, and
upon the will and desires of the economic social
ideological apparatuses of those who organize
class that controls the material resource
and control the material resources (and their
framework through the actions of their bodies
distribution) required for physical (embodied)
(practical consciousness), language, symbols,
survival in a particular resource framework. So
ideology, ideological apparatuses, and social
contrary to Karl Marx‟s materialism which
relations of production. They choose, amidst
posits human consciousness to be the product of
the class division of the social relations of
material conditions, the logic here is a structural
production, “the structure of the conjuncture,”
Marxist one in the Althusserian sense. That is,
(Marshall Sahlins‟s term) what other meaning
the aggregated, atomic, mature human being is a
constitutions and practices are allowed to
body and neuronal drives that never encounters
manifest themselves without the Beings of that
the (ontological) material world directly.
practice facing alienation, marginalization,
Instead, they encounter the (ideological) world
domination, or death. The individual being is
via structures of signification, which structures
initially constituted as superimposed, entangled,
the world or a particular part of it through the
recycled, and embodied subatomic particles of
body, language, ideology, ideological
multiple worlds of the multiverse, which have
apparatuses, and communicative discourse, i.e.,
their own predetermined form of understanding
social class language game, of those whose
and cognition, phenomenal properties, based on
power and power positions dictate how the
previous or simultaneous experiences as
resources of that framework are to be gathered,
aggregated matter (this is akin to what the Greek
used, and distributed (means and mode of
Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology V1 ● I1 ● 2019 5Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism
philosopher Plato refers to when he posits and brain at the expense of the drives/desires of
knowledge as recollection of the Soul). Again, the subatomic particles or the social class
the individual‟s actions are not necessarily language game of the material resource framework
determined by the embodiment and drives of they find their existence unfolding in.
these recycled/entangled/superimposed subatomic
The social class language game, and its
particles. It is conflict and an individual‟s
differentiating effects, an individual find their
stance, ready-to-hand, unready-to-hand, and
existence unfolding in is the third structuring
present-at-hand, when the subatomic particles
structure, which attempts to determine the
become aggregated matter or embodied, which
actions of individual beings as they experience
determines whether are not they become aware,
being-in-the-world as embodied subatomic
present-at-hand, of the subatomic particle drives
particles. The aggregated individual finds
and choose to recursively reorganize and
themselves objectified and unfolding within a
reproduce the content of the drives as their
material resource framework controlled by the
practical consciousness.
actions of other bodies, which presuppose their
This desire to reproduce the cognition and existence, via the actions of their bodies
understanding of the (chemical, biological, and (practical consciousness), language, communicative
physiological) drives of the recycled /entangled discourse, ideology, and ideological apparatuses
/superimposed subatomic particles, however, stemming from how they satisfy the desires of
may be limited by the structuring structure of their bodies and subatomic particle drives
the aggregated body and brain of the individual (means and mode of production). What is
subject. aggregated as a social class language game by
those in power positions via and within its mode
That is to say, the second origins and basis of
of production, language, ideology, ideological
an individual‟s actions are the structuring drives
apparatuses, and communicative discourse
and desires, for food, clothing, shelter, social
attempts to interpellate and subjectify other
interaction, and sex, of the aggregated body and
beings to its interpretive frame of satisfying
brain, which the subatomic particles constitute
their bodily needs, fulfilling the impulses of
and embody. In other words, the aggregated
their subatomic particles, and organizing a
body and brain is preprogrammed with its own
material resource framework at the expense of
(biological) forms of sensibility, understanding,
all others, and becomes a third form of
and cognition, structuring structure, by which it
structuring individual action based on the mode
experiences being-in-the-world as aggregated
of production and how it differentiates
embodied subatomic particles.
individual actors.
These bodily forms of sensibility, understanding,
That is to say, an individual‟s interpellation,
and cognition, such as the drive and desire for
subjectification, and differentiation within the
food, clothing, shelter, social interaction,
social class language game that presupposes
linguistic communication, and sex, are tied to
their being-in-a-world attempts to determine
the material embodiment and survival of the
their actions or practical consciousness via the
embodied individual actor, and may or may not
reified language, ideology, etc., of the social
supersede or conflict with the desire and drive
class language game, the meaning of which can
of an individual to recursively (re) organize and
be deferred via the communicative discourse of
reproduce the structuring structure of the
the individual actors. Hence, the deferment of
superimposed, entangled, and recycled
meaning in ego-centered communicative
(phenomenal properties of) subatomic particles.
discourse of the language and ideology of a
If these two initial structuring structures are in
social class language game is the final means of
conflict, the individual moves from the ready-to-
determining an individual‟s action or practical
hand to the unready-to-hand stance or analytics
consciousness outside of, and in relation to, its
where they may begin to reflect upon and
stance, i.e., analytics, vis-à-vis the drives of
question their being-in-the-world prior to acting.
subatomic particles, drives and desires of the
Hence just as in the case of the structuring
body and brain, and structural reproduction and
structure of the subatomic particles it is an
differentiation.
individual being‟s analytics vis-à-vis the drives
of its body and brain in relation to the impulses Whereas the practical consciousness of the
of the subatomic particles, which determines transcendental ego stemming from the impulses
whether or not they become driven by the desire of embodied subatomic particles are
to solely fulfill the material needs of their body indeterminant as with its neuronal processes
6 Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology V1 ● I1 ● 2019Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism
involved with the constitution of meaning in meanings for alternative forms of being-in-the-
ego-centered communicative discourse (Albeit world within their social class language. They
physicists are in the process of exploring the can accept, marginalize, or seek to eradicate the
nature, origins, and final states of subatomic deferred or decentered subject or their practices.
particles, and neuroscientists are attempting to
understand the role of neuronal activities in CONCLUSIONS
developing the transcendental ego and whether Hence within the theory and methodology of
or not it continues to exist after death). The phenomenological structuralism, there is,
form of the understandings and sensibilities of contrary to David Hume‟s “bundle of
the body and brain are determinant as with perception” hypothesis, a human essence, which
structural reproduction and differentiation of the is tied to the embodiment and structuring
mode of production, and therefore can be structure of the phenomenal properties of
mapped out by neuroscientists, biologists, and superimposed, entangled, embodied, and
sociologists to determine the nature, origins, and recycled subatomic particles, the processes of
directions of societal constitution and an which are unbeknownst to us as of the writing of
individual actor‟s practical consciousness this work, as they are recursively reorganized
unfolding. and reproduced via the superverse and its
The interaction of all four elements or processes multiverses.
in relation to the (mental) stance of the Just the same, Universalism and Truth are also
transcendental ego of the individual actor is the tied to the science and physics of the remaining
basis for human action, praxis/practical processes of phenomenological structuralism.
consciousness in a world. However, in the end, Subatomic/chemical particles with phenomenal
consequently, the majority of practical properties constitute objects and subjects that
consciousness will be a product of an individual are external and internal to the perceiving
actor‟s embodiment and the structural human actor who knows them (the objects and
reproduction and differentiation of a social class subjects) as both external and internal
language game given 1) the determinant nature phenomenon endowed with, and mediated by,
of embodiment, form of understanding and linguistic and ideological meanings, stemming from
sensibility of the body and brain amidst, the modes of production, of other human actors
paradoxically, the indeterminacy of impulses of who presupposed their aggregated existence.
embodied subatomic particles and the neuronal
The essence, universalism, and Truth of an
processes involved in ego-centered communicative
object and subject lies in the phenomenal
discourse; and 2) the consolidation of power of
properties of their subatomic and chemical
those who control the material resource
particles once demystified and demythologized,
framework wherein a society, the social class
from linguistic and ideological meanings and
language game, is ensconced and the threat that
understandings associated with the mode of
power (consolidated and constituted via the
human production, by the techniques of
actions of bodies, mode of production, language,
phenomenology and the scientific process.
ideology, ideological apparatuses, and
communicative discourse) poses to the ontological Be that as it may, for phenomenological
security of an aggregated individual actor who structuralism, in keeping with the empiricist
chooses (or not) either ready-to-hand or present- logic of Bertrand Russell, “outside of human
at-hand to recursively reorganize and reproduce desires there are no moral standards.” Morality
the ideals of the society as their practical or moral standards are associated with the
consciousness. It should be mentioned that in linguistic and ideological desires (power and
response to this latter process, those in power power positions) of those who control the
positions who internalize the ideals of the social resources and mode of production of a material
structure and recursively (re) organize and resource framework via their language, ideology,
reproduce them as their practical consciousness ideological apparatuses, and communicative
are in the unready-to-hand stance when they discourse (i.e., social class language game). It
encounter alternative forms of being-in-the- (moral practices and statements) constitutes a part
world within their social class language game. of the superverse /multiverse as phenomenal
They dialectically attempt to reconcile the properties of subatomic particles once
practical consciousness of their social class disaggregated as lived-experience. In that
language game with the reified practical sense, assuming the phenomenal properties of
consciousness of those who have deferred their subatomic particles get recycled between the
Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology V1 ● I1 ● 2019 7Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism
superverse and its multiverses as I am positing [10] Fraser, Nancy (1997). Justice Interruptus:
here, morality is an epiphenomenon of lived- Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist”
experience and becomes an emergent property Condition. New York & London: Routledge.
of the superverse and its multiverses, which [11] Hameroff, Stuart and Roger Penrose (2014).
constitute the laws (platonic forms or concepts “Consciousness in the Universe: A Review of
such as beauty, justice, egalitarianism, etc.) of the „Orch OR‟ theory.” Physics of Life
Haitian metaphysics that human reason, which Reviews, 11: 39-78.
are the recycled/entangled/superimposed subatomic [12] Holloway, Joseph E. (ed.) (1990a). Africanisms in
neuronal/chemical particles of the superverse American Culture. Bloomington and Indianapolis:
Indiana University Press.
and multiverse operating through DNA and its
aggregation as the brain and mind (perception), [13] Holloway, Joseph E. (1990b). The Origins of
can reflect upon to constitute their being-in-the- African-American Culture. In Joseph
world (practical consciousness) in relation to the [14] Holloway (Ed.), Africanisms in American
language, ideology, etc., i.e., social class language Culture (19-33). Bloomington and
Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
game, of those who precedes individual existence.
[15] Horkheimer, Max and Theodor W. Adorno
Ostensibly, social change, following subatomic (2000 [1944]. Dialectic of Enlightenment
particle aggregation, is tied to both the 1) (John Cumming, Trans.). New York:
differentiating effects and techniques of the social Continuum.
class language game of those who control the [16] Hudson, Kenneth and Andrea Coukos (2005).
material resource framework of (an) earth, 2) and The Dark Side of the Protestant Ethic: A
the ability to defer meaning in ego-centered Comparative Analysis of Welfare Reform.
communicative discourse, via symbols, Sociological Theory 23 (1): 1-24.
language, ideology, etc., which encapsulates or [17] James, CLR (1986). The Black Jacobins:
is the medium by which the laws (concepts) of Toussaint L‟ Ouverture and the San Domingo
the superverse and its multiverses are expressed Revolution. Vintage
as human practical consciousness in material [18] Karenga, Maulana (1993). Introduction to
worlds. Black Studies. California: The University of
Sankore Press.
REFERENCES [19] Kellner, Douglas (2002). Theorizing
[1] Althusser, Louis (2001). Lenin and Philosophy Globalization. Sociological Theory, 20:3, 285-
and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review 305.
Press. [20] Kurtz, Lester R. (2007). Gods in the Global
[2] Althusser, Louis and Étienne Balibar (1970). Village: The World‟s Religions in Sociological
Reading Capital (Ben Brewster, Trans.). Perspective. California: Sage Publications.
London: NLB. [21] Lukács, Georg (1971). History and Class
[3] Balibar, Etienne & Immanuel Wallerstein Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics
(1991 [1988]). Race, Nation, Class: (Rodney Livingstone, Trans.). Cambridge,
Ambiguous Identities. London: Verso. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
[4] Buck-Morss, Susan (2009). Hegel, Haiti, and [22] Lukács, Georg (2000). A Defence of History
Universal History. Pittsburgh: University of and Class Consciousness: Tailism and the
Pittsburgh Press. Dialectic (Esther Leslie, Trans.). London and
[5] Cohen, J. (2002). Protestantism and New York: Verso.
Capitalism: The Mechanisms of Influence. [23] Marcuse, Herbert (1964). One-Dimensional
New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Man. Boston: Beacon Press.
[6] Crothers, Charles (2003). “Technical Advances [24] Marcuse, Herbert (1974). Eros and
in General Sociological Theory: The Potential Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into
Contribution of Post-Structurationist Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.
Sociology.” Perspectives, 26: 3, 3-6. [25] Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels (1964). The
[7] Dahrendorf, Ralf (1959). Class and Class Communist Manifesto. London, England:
Conflict in Industrial Society. Penguin Books.
Stanford,California: Stanford University Press. [26] Marx, Karl (1992 [1867]). Capital: A Critique
[8] Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. of Political Economy (Volume 1, Samuel
New York: Syracuse University Press. Moore and Edward Aveling, Trans.). New
[9] Du Bois, Laurent (2004). Avengers of the New York: International Publishers.
World. Massachusetts: Harvard University [27] Marx, Karl (1998 [1845]). The German
Press. Ideology. New York: Prometheus Books.
8 Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology V1 ● I1 ● 2019Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism
[28] McMichael, Philip (2008). Development and [34] Rubin, Vera (Ed.) (1960). Caribbean Studies: A
Social Change: A Global Perspective. Los Symposium. Seattle: University of Washington
Angeles, California: Sage Publications. Press.
[29] Mocombe, Paul C. (2016). The Vodou Ethic [35] Sklair, Leslie (1995). Sociology of the Global
and the Spirit of Communism: The Practical System. Baltimore: West view Press. Smith
Consciousness of the African People of Haiti. M.G. (1960). The African Heritage in the
Maryland: University Press of America. Caribbean. In Vera Rubin (Ed.), Caribbean
[30] Mocombe, Paul C. (2009). The Soul-less Souls Studies: A Symposium (pp. 34-46). Seattle:
of Black Folk: A Sociological Reconsideration University of Washington Press.
of Black Consciousness as Du Boisian Double [36] Wallerstein, Immanuel (1982). The Rise and
Consciousness. Maryland: University Press of Future Demise of the World Capitalist System:
America. Concepts for Comparative Analysis. In Hamza
[31] Ortner, Sherry (1984). Theory in Anthropology Alavi and Teodor Shanin (Eds.), Introduction to
Since the Sixties, Comparative Studies in the Sociology of “Developing Societies”
Society and History 26: 126-66. [37] (pp. 29-53). New York: Monthly Review
[32] Patterson, Orlando (1982). Slavery and Social Press.
Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, [38] Weber, Max (1958 [1904-1905]). The
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
[33] Ramsey, Kate (2011). The Spirits and the Law: (Talcott Parsons, Trans.). New York: Charles
Vodou and Power in Haiti. Chicago: University Scribner‟s Sons.
of Chicago Press.
Citation: Paul C. Mocombe "Consciousness in the Universe According to Phenomenological Structuralism”,
Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology, 1(1), 2019, pp.1-9.
Copyright: © 2019 Paul C. Mocombe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology V1 ● I1 ● 2019 9You can also read
