Congress of the United States - Politico
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
FRANK PALLONE, JR., NEW JERSEY CATHY McMORRIS RODGERS, WASHINGTON
CHAIRMAN RANKING MEMBER
ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
2125 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC 20515-6115
Majority (202) 225-2927
Minority (202) 225-3641
March 18, 2021
The Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Director
National Institutes of Health
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20892
Dear Dr. Collins,
We write to request information, assistance, and needed-leadership from the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) to advance an independent, scientific investigation into the origins of
the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has been the worst public health crisis in the U.S. in about a
hundred years. Over a year has passed since the deadly virus reached our shores and yet, the
origin of the virus has yet to be determined. An independent, expert investigation of the origin
of COVID-19 is of paramount importance to public health and biosecurity. As noted by Stanford
Medical School Professor David Relman:
A more complete understanding of the origins of COVID-19 clearly serves the
interests of every person in every country on this planet. It will limit further
recriminations and diminish the likelihood of conflict; it will lead to more effective
responses to this pandemic, as well as efforts to anticipate and prevent the next one.
It will also advance our discussions about risky science. And it will do something
else: Delineating COVID-19’s origin story will help elucidate the nature of our very
precarious coexistence within the biosphere.1
Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) attempted to investigate the origin of
COVID-19. The WHO said that this investigative mission would be guided by the science, be
1
David A. Relman, Opinion: To stop the next pandemic, we need to unravel the origins of COVID-19, PNAS (Nov.
2020), available at https://www.pnas.org/content/117/47/29246.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 2
“open-minded,” and “not exclude[e] any hypothesis.”2 Unfortunately, China did not provide
complete access or independence for the critical WHO mission. On February 13, 2021, National
Security Advisor Jake Sullivan issued the following statement:
We have deep concerns about the way in which the early findings of the COVID-
19 investigation were communicated and questions about the process used to reach
them. It is imperative that this report be independent, with expert findings free from
intervention or alteration by the Chinese government. To better understand this
pandemic and prepare for the next one, China must make available its data from
the earliest days of the outbreak.3
Because of rising tensions between the U.S. and China, the WHO scrapped plans for an
interim report.4 An international group of science experts, including specialists in virology,
microbiology, and zoology, asked for a new review.5
The NIH, as a premier scientific institution, must lead in order to foster a transparent,
independent, and science-based investigation into the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic. Such
an effort must meet the WHO’s stated goals of an open-minded investigation that does not
exclude any plausible hypothesis.6 In addition, the NIH is well-positioned to gather and provide
information through oversight of its grants and other federal awards. Thus, the NIH is in a
unique position to investigate the possibility that the pandemic stemmed from a laboratory
accident or leak, especially regarding the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
NIH raised concerns over a possible link between WIV and the COVID-19 outbreak
during its review of federal awards to EcoHealth Alliance, a global environmental health
nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting wildlife and public health from the emergence of
disease. Of the $13.7 million in federal awards that NIH authorized for EcoHealth Alliance, 17
2
Smriti Mallapaty, Where did COVID come from? WHO investigation begins but faces challenges, NATURE (Nov.
11, 2020), available at https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03165-9.
3
The White House, Statement of National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan (Feb. 13, 2021), available at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/02/13/statement-by-national-security-advisor-
jake-sullivan/.
4
Betsy McKay, Drew Hinshaw and Jeremy Page, WHO Investigators to Scrap Plans for Interim Report on Probe of
Covid-19 Origins, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Mar. 4, 2021), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/who-
investigators-to-scrap-interim-report-on-probe-of-covid-19-origins-11614865067?mod=latest_headlines
5
Jaime Metzl, et al, Call for a Full and Unrestricted International Forensic Investigation into the Origins of
COVID-19 (March 4, 2021), available at
https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/COVID%20OPEN%20LETTER%20FINAL%20030421%20(1).pdf.
The co-organizer of the letter and a WHO advisor on human genome editing, Jaime Metzl, PhD, said there is an
eighty-five percent chance the pandemic started with an accidental leak from the WIV or Wuhan CDC laboratory,
available at https://jamiemetzl.com/origins-of-sars-cov-2/. (“I have no definitive way of proving this thesis but the
evidence is, in my view, extremely convincing. If forced to place odds on the confidence of my hypothesis, I would
say there’s an 85% chance the pandemic started with an accidental leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology or
Wuhan CDC and a 15% chance it began in some other way (in fairness, here is an article making the case for a
zoonotic jump “in the wild”). If China keeps preventing a full and unrestricted international forensic investigation
into the origins of the pandemic, I believe it is fair to deny Beijing the benefit of the doubt.”)
6
Washington Post Editorial Board, We’re still missing the origin story of this pandemic. China is sitting on the
answers, THE WASHINGTON POST (Feb. 5, 2021), available at
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/02/05/coronavirus-origins-mystery-china/?arc404=true.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 3
projects sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) have
provided over $7.9 million in federal awards for research of viral emergence from bats in
Southeast Asia.7 EcoHealth Alliance passed some of its funding to the WIV, and in 2020, NIH
made efforts to obtain information from EcoHealth Alliance about WIV related to concerns
about the origins of COVID-19. In April 2020, NIH wrote to EcoHealth Alliance and Columbia
University about an NIH-funded project entitled, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus
Emergency:”
It is our understanding that one of the sub-recipients of the grant funds is the Wuhan
Institute of Virology (‘WIV’). It is our understanding that WIV studies the
interaction between corona viruses and bats. The scientific community believes
that the coronavirus causing COVID-19 jumped from bats to humans likely in
Wuhan where the COVID-19 pandemic began. There are now allegations that the
current crisis was precipitated by the release from WIV of the coronavirus
responsible for COVID-19. Given these concerns, we are pursuing suspension of
WIV from participation in Federal programs. It is in the public interest that NIH
ensure that a sub-recipient has taken all appropriate precautions to prevent the
release of pathogens that it is studying. This suspension of the sub-recipient does
not affect the remainder of your grant assuming that no grant funds are provided to
WIV following receipt of this email during the period of suspension.8
In January 2021, the U.S. Department of State issued a fact sheet about the activity at the
WIV.9 Among other revelations, it reported the following:
• The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became
sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms
consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about
the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was “zero
infection” among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses.10
• Starting in at least 2016, WIV researchers conducted experiments involving RaTG13, the
bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as the closest sample to SARS-CoV-
2 (96.2 percent similar).11 There was no indication that this research was suspended at any
time prior to the COVID-19 outbreak.
• The WIV has a published record of conducting “gain-of-function” research to engineer
chimeric viruses.12 But the WIV has not been transparent or consistent about its record of
7
NIH RePORTER, Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (queried Mar. 4, 2021), available at
https://reporter.nih.gov/search/qlYUeI9DIk2JfWUdCcWxcA/projects/charts.
8
Mark Moore, NIH investigating Wuhan lab at center of coronavirus pandemic, NEW YORK POST (Apr. 28, 2020),
available at https://nypost.com/2020/04/28/nih-investigating-wuhan-lab-at-center-of-coronavirus-pandemic/.
9
U.S. Department of State, Fact Sheet: Activity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Office of the Spokesperson (Jan.
15, 2021), available at https://2017-2021.state.gov/fact-sheet-activity-at-the-wuhan-institute-of-
virology//index.html.
10
Id.
11
Id.
12
Id.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 4
studying viruses similar to the COVID-19 virus, including “RaTG13,” which was sampled
from a cave in Yunnan Province in 2013 after several miners died of SARS-like illness.13
• WHO investigators must have access to the records of the WIV’s work on bat and other
coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak. As part of a thorough inquiry, they must
have a full accounting of why the WIV altered and then removed online records of its work
with RaTG13 and other viruses.14
• Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the U.S. has determined that the
WIV has collaborated on projects with China’s military.15 The WIV has engaged in
classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese
military since at least 2017.16
• The U.S. and other donors who funded or collaborated on civilian research at the WIV have
a right and obligation to determine whether any of our research funding was diverted to
secret Chinese military projects at the WIV.17
Notably, the State Department’s former lead investigator who oversaw the Task Force
into the COVID-19 virus origin stated recently that he not only believes the virus escaped from
the WIV, but that it may have been the result of research that the Chinese military, or People’s
Liberation Army, was doing on a bioweapon.18
Accordingly, it is imperative to determine not only where SARS-CoV-2 originated, but
also how and if NIH’s funding and research to projects at the WIV could have contributed to
SARS CoV-2. To assist our requests and inquiry, please provide the following by April 19,
2021:
1. An assessment from a classified U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report included
the possibility that the origins of SARS CoV-2 could have emerged accidentally from a
laboratory in Wuhan, China due to unsafe laboratory practices.19 The DIA report cited
U.S. government and Chinese researchers who found “about 33 percent of the original 41
identified cases did not have direct exposure” to the market.20 That, along with what is
known of the WIV’s work in past few years, raised reasonable suspicion that the
13
Id.
14
Id.
15
Id.
16
Id.
17
Id.
18
,
Jennifer Griffin Former top State Dept. investigator says COVID-19 outbreak may have resulted from
bioweapons research accident, Fox News (March 13, 2021), available at https://www.foxnews.com/world/top-
state-official-coronavirus-bioweapon-accident
19
Fred Guterl, Naveed Jamali and Tom O’Connor, The Controversial Experiments ad Wuhan Lab Suspected of
Starting the Coronavirus Pandemic, NEWSWEEK (Apr. 27, 2020), available at
https://www.newsweek.com/controversial-wuhan-lab-experiments-that-may-have-started-coronavirus-pandemic-
1500503.
20
Id.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 5
pandemic may have been caused by a lab error, not a wet market.21 Further, a WHO
inspector on the recent mission noted that “we know not all of those first 174 early
COVID-19 cases visited the market, including the man diagnosed in December 2019 with
the earliest onset date.”22 What information does the NIH have on the earliest COVID-19
cases?
2. According to an editorial on February 23, 2021, in The Wall Street Journal by former
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Miles Yu, “[China’s] army of scientists claim to
have discovered almost 2,000 new viruses in a little over a decade.”23 How many of
these discovered viruses does the NIH have information on and were any of these viruses
discovered at the WIV?
3. According to The Wall Street Journal editorial mentioned in the previous question, some
have alleged that the WIV’s virus-carrying animals were sold as pets and may even show
up at local wet markets.24 Is the NIH aware of these allegations? If so, please provide
any information the NIH has related to these allegations.
4. Please provide all information that NIH has about laboratory accidents and/or biosafety
practices at the WIV since January 1, 2015.
5. Please provide all information that NIH has from NIH staff, grantees, sub-grantees,
contractors, or subcontractors about communications and events at the WIV from August
2019 to the present.
6. Please provide all information that NIH has from NIH staff, grantees, sub-grantees,
contractors, or subcontractors about their communications with China-based NIH,
Chinese National Science Foundation, CDC, and China CDC about events at the WIV
from August 2019 to the present.
State Department Cables
21
Id.
22
Dominic Dwyer, I was the Australian doctor on the WHO’s COVID-19 mission to China. Here’s what we found
about the origins of the coronavirus, THE CONVERSATION (Feb. 21, 2021), available
athttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/feb/22/i-was-on-the-whos-covid-mission-to-china-heres-what-
we-found. See also Jeremy Page and Drew Hinshaw, China Refuses to Give WHO Raw Data on Early Covid-19
Cases, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Feb. 12, 2021), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-refuses-to-
give-who-raw-data-on-early-covid-19-cases-
11613150580#:~:text=BEIJING%E2%80%94Chinese%20authorities%20refused%20to,over%20the%20lack%20of
%20detail. (“Chinese authorities refused to provide World Health Organization investigators with raw, personalized
data on early Covid-19 cases that could help them determine how and when the coronavirus first began to spread in
China, according to WHO investigators who described heated exchanges over the lack of detail. The Chinese
authorities turned down requests to provide such data on 174 cases of Covid-19 that they have identified from the
early phase of the outbreak in the Chinese city of Wuhan in December 2019. Investigators are part of a WHO team
that this week completed a monthlong mission in China aimed at determining the origins of the pandemic.”)
23
Id.
24
Mike Pompeo and Miles Yu, NIH Presses U.S. Nonprofit for Information on Wuhan Virology Lab, THE WALL
STREET JOURNAL (Feb. 23, 2021), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-reckless-labs-put-the-world-at-
risk-11614102828.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 6
7. What information does NIH have about the WIV’s responses to the 2018 U.S.
Department of State cables (attached to this letter) regarding safety concerns?
8. The April 2018 cable from the U.S. Department of State stated that the WIV planned to
invite University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston (UTMBG) researchers to do
research in Wuhan’s labs. Please provide any information NIH received that indicates
whether the WIV invited UTMBG researchers, and whether UTMBG researchers
conducted any research in Wuhan’s labs.
a. If there was such research, please provide information and any documents related
to this research.
9. Why was it pertinent to the NIH investigation that the “nonprofit [EcoHealth Alliance]
must provide the “WIV’s responses to the 2018 Department of State cables regarding
safety concerns”?25
a. Did EcoHealth Alliance provide this information? If so, how did NIH use the
information to further its investigation?
EcoHealth Alliance, Columbia University Health Sciences
10. Was the 2019 NIH federal award to EcoHealth Alliance reviewed and approved by the
HHS Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) committee?26
a. If so, please provide the documentation with the committee’s decision.
b. Please also provide the names of the individuals who were members of the
committee at the time.
11. Please provide all correspondence and communications between NIH and EcoHealth
Alliance, since January 1, 2020, related to federal funding involving the WIV. The
documentation should include, but not be limited to, correspondence between NIH and
EcoHealth Alliance dated sometime in April 2020, on July 8, 2020, and sometime in
August 2020.
12. In April 2020, NIH suspended a 2019 federal award to EcoHealth Alliance, in part,
because NIH did not believe the work aligned with “program goals and agency
priorities.”27 Please specify the work that was done by the EcoHealth Alliance that did
25
Meredith Wadman, NIH imposes ‘outrageous’ conditions on resuming coronavirus grant targeted by Trump,
SCIENCEMAG (Aug. 19, 2020), available at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/08/nih-imposes-outrageous-
conditions-resuming-coronavirus-grant-targeted-trump.
26
National Institutes of Health, Notice Announcing the Removal of the Funding Pause for Gain-of-Function
Research Project (Dec. 19, 2017), available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-17-
071.html.
27
Id.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 7
not align with the agency’s program goals and priorities, and when that work was
conducted.
a. Was an evaluation of EcoHealth Alliance’s work and whether it aligned with the
agency’s program goals and priorities conducted by the NIH before the award was
issued? If yes, please provide any related documentation. If not, why not?
13. In April 2020 correspondence with EcoHealth Alliance, NIH wrote that it “received
reports that the Wuhan Institute of Virology…has been conducting research at its
facilities in China that pose serious bio-safety concerns.”28 What are the sources for
those reports to NIH and what were the specific allegations reported?
14. Why did the NIH request that EcoHealth Alliance provide a sample of the pandemic
coronavirus that the WIV used to determine its genetic sequence for SARS CoV-2?29
a. Why is this information important to NIH’s investigation?
b. Has NIH obtained the sample and if so, what evaluations have been done, and for
what purpose?
c. If NIH has not yet obtained the sample, what are the planned studies and
evaluations NIH will conduct with the sample when it is obtained?
15. What is the nature of NIH’s concerns about purported restrictions at the WIV
including “diminished cell-phone traffic in October 2019, and the evidence that there
may have been roadblocks surrounding the facility from October 14-19, 2019[,]” about
the WIV lab or virus origin?30
a. What is the basis of information to NIH about the purported restrictions at the
WIV?
b. What are the other purported restrictions at the WIV in October 2019?
16. After terminating EcoHealth Alliance’s 2019 project entitled “Understanding the Risk of
Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” the NIH later offered to reinstate the EcoHealth Alliance
funding in July 2020 if EcoHealth Alliance agreed to meet certain conditions.31
28
Betsy McKay, NIH Presses U.S. Nonprofit for Information on Wuhan Virology Lab, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
(Aug. 19. 2020), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/nih-presses-u-s-nonprofit-for-information-on-wuhan-
virology-lab-11597829400.
29
Meredith Wadman, NIH imposes ‘outrageous’ conditions on resuming coronavirus grant targeted by Trump,
SCIENCEMAG (Aug. 19, 2020), available at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/08/nih-imposes-outrageous-
conditions-resuming-coronavirus-grant-targeted-trump.
30
Id.
31
Betsy McKay, NIH Presses U.S. Nonprofit for Information on Wuhan Virology Lab, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
(Aug. 19. 2020), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/nih-presses-u-s-nonprofit-for-information-on-wuhan-
virology-lab-11597829400.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 8
a. Please provide all of the information presented to NIH from EcoHealth Alliance
in response to NIH’s conditions for reinstatement.
b. What actions did NIH take based upon the information received? How has the
information been used in NIH’s investigation?
c. One condition for the federal award reinstatement was for EcoHealth Alliance to
arrange for an outside inspection of the WIV and its records, “with specific
attention to addressing the question of whether WIV staff had SARS-CoV-2their
possession prior to December 2019.”32 Why is it pertinent to the NIH’s
investigation if staff at WIV had SARS-CoV-2 in their possession prior to
December 2019? What is the potential significance if the staff did have the virus
in their possession prior to December 2019?
d. What information does NIH have that was used for the basis of requesting that the
EcoHealth Alliance “must ‘explain the apparent disappearance’ of a scientist who
worked in the Wuhan lab,” and on social media was rumored to be “patient zero”
of the pandemic?33
i. What is the potential significance about the whereabouts of this scientist
and the photo being removed from the website?
17. Please provide all correspondence and communications between NIH and Columbia
University related to federal funding involving the WIV, including email correspondence
in April 2020 between Dr. Michael Lauer, Deputy Director of extramural research, and
Naomi Schrag of Columbia University.
a. In an April 2020 email, Dr. Lauer advised Naomi Schrag of Columbia University
that it would be helpful for NIH “to know about all China-based participants in
this work since the Type 1 grant started in 2014 - who they were and how much
money they received.”34 Why did NIH request that Columbia University provide
information about all of the China-based participants?
i. What is the pertinence of the timeframe starting in 2014 for the requested
information?
ii. Did Columbia University provide the NIH with the requested information
about all of the China-based participants from all grantees since 2014? If
so, please provide the information1. If not, why not?
Federal Funding Records
32
Id.
33
Id.
34
Meredith Wadman and Jon Cohen, NIH’s axing of bat coronavirus grant a ‘horrible precedent’ and might break
rules, critics say, SCIENCEMAG (Apr. 30, 2020), available at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/nih-s-
axing-bat-coronavirus-grant-horrible-precedent-and-might-break-rules-critics-say.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 9
18. Please provide ledgers or any accounting for dispersion of all NIH federal funding
awards that EcoHealth Alliance has sent to the WIV, including through contracts, grants,
donations, cooperative agreements, staffing, or any other support or means. In addition,
please provide the results and outcomes from the funding and support.35
19. What is the total amount of NIH federal funding per year from 2017 through 2021 that
has directly or indirectly supported the WIV scientists or research through grant
recipients, including to EcoHealth Alliance; Wildlife Trust, Inc.; Columbia University
Health Sciences; Trustees of Columbia University; University of North Carolina Chapel
Hill; Vanderbilt University; University of Virginia; and Oregon Health and Science
University?36
20. According to a report in The Washington Post on April 14, 2020, the WIV issued a news
release in English about the final visit from U.S. Embassy scientist diplomats in Beijing,
which occurred on March 27, 2018.37 Does the NIH have a copy of this news release? If
so, please provide a copy.
21. For NIH award recipients that have provided support to the WIV since January 1, 2012,
please provide annual reports, trip reports related to the WIV, documentation of any
survey or field trips by the WIV, and interim data summaries from the WIV.
22. Please provide copies of all grantee annual reports, progress reports, projects, studies, and
observations since 2014 where foreign sites for all Type 1 and Type 2 awards have been
documented as involving the WIV.
23. Please provide copies of all grantee annual reports, progress reports, projects, studies, and
observations since 2014 for NIH domestic grantee awards with a foreign component
involving the WIV.
24. Please provide the name(s) of the NIH program manager(s) or officer(s) responsible for
overseeing the grants to EcoHealth Alliance and time period(s) of responsibility.
25. Please provide the name(s) of the NIH Scientific Review Officers responsible for
reviewing and approving any NIH financial awards to EcoHealth Alliance and any other
funding recipients that supported the WIV.
35
Betsy McKay, NIH Presses U.S. Nonprofit for Information on Wuhan Virology Lab, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
(Aug. 19. 2020), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/nih-presses-u-s-nonprofit-for-information-on-wuhan-
virology-lab-11597829400.
36
National Institutes of Health, Research Portfolio online Reporting Tools, NIH RePorter available at
https://report.nih.gov/ (last accessed March 6, 2020).
37
Josh Rogin, Opinion: State Department cables warned of safety issues at Wuhan lab studying bat coronaviruses,
THE WASHINGTON POST (Apr. 14, 2020), available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/14/state-
department-cables-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-lab-studying-bat-coronaviruses/.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 10
26. According to an editorial in The Wall Street Journal, the WIV housed tens of thousands
of bat samples and laboratory animals in 2019.38 Please provide any information the NIH
has on the number of bat samples and animals at the WIV.
a. Did any NIH scientists who are fluent in Mandarin review the Chinese scientific
literature on the WIV research related to coronaviruses that is dated before
February 1, 2020?
27. Does the NIH have the unpublished sequences of bat coronaviruses that were maintained
in the WIV database before December 30, 2019, or before the database was removed
from the internet?39 Does NIH have the full sequences of the eight viruses sampled in the
Yunnan province on an EcoHealth Alliance bat-virus sampling trip in 2015?
a. Please provide NIH’s analysis if the sequences have been analyzed.
b. If NIH does not have the sequences, can NIH get this information from the
EcoHealth Alliance or from other NIH-funded sources?
28. Please provide the original version of “Origin and cross-species transmission of bat
coronaviruses in China” that was submitted to Nature by EcoHealth Alliance on
October 6, 2019, published August 25, 2020, and funded in part by NIAID (award
number R01AI110964).40 If NIH does not have the October 6, 2019 report, can NIH
obtain it from EcoHealth Alliance for this response? If so, please provide the report.
29. Have NIH, EcoHealth Alliance, or other NIH award recipient(s) been denied permission
or access to results of any WIV research, which indirectly received financial support from
NIH awards? If so, please provide the date(s), individuals involved, and circumstances of
each denial.
We request that the NIH provide the requested documents and information in a
coordinated response from all stakeholders and the appropriate divisions within NIH, including
but not limited to subject matter experts from NIH’s Division of Security and Emergency
Response, the Office of Management Assessment, the Center for Scientific Review, the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the Office of Extramural Research. After the
requested information has been provided, we ask that the NIH provide a briefing to the Minority
Committee staff to discuss the information that the NIH has related to the origins of SARS-CoV-
2, including any potential links to the WIV. Finally, we request that you appoint an NIH
working group representing an appropriate diversity of scientific disciplines to collect data and
38
Mike Pompeo and Miles Yu, NIH Presses U.S. Nonprofit for Information on Wuhan Virology Lab, THE WALL
STREET JOURNAL (Feb. 23, 2021), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-reckless-labs-put-the-world-at-
risk-11614102828.
39
Washington Post Editorial Board, We’re still missing the origin story of this pandemic. China is sitting on the
answers, THE WASHINGTON POST (Feb. 5, 2021), available at
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/02/05/coronavirus-origins-mystery-china/?arc404=true.
40
Latinne, A., Hu, B., Olival, K.J. et al,. Origin and cross-species transmission of bat coronaviruses in China,
Nature (Aug. 25, 2020), available at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17687-3#Ack1.Letter to the Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Page 11
information related to COVID-19 origins (including the WIV), and that the NIH working group
coordinate and consult with foreign scientific agencies involved in similar work.
Your assistance with this request is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please
contact Alan Slobodin or Diane Cutler of the Minority Committee staff.
Sincerely,
__________________________________ __________________________________
Cathy McMorris Rodgers Brett Guthrie
Republican Leader Republican Leader
Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health
__________________________________
H. Morgan Griffith
Republican Leader
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
Attachment
Cc: The Honorable Frank Pallone, Chairman
The Honorable Diana DeGette, Chair, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
The Honorable Anna Eshoo, Chair, Subcommittee on HealthYou can also read
