COMMUNITY SEED BANKS: SHARING EXPERIENCES FROM NORTH AND SOUTH - Diversifood
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
COMMUNITY SEED BANKS: SHARING EXPERIENCES FROM NORTH AND SOUTH © Johannes Hloch REPORT FROM A SIDE EVENT HELD © Pratap Shrestha(LI-BIRD) 1 NOVEMBER 2017, DURING THE SEVENTH SESSION OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE INTERNATIONAL TREATY ON PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN KIGALI, RWANDA © Alexandra Devik Regine Andersen, Pitambar Shrestha, Gloria Otieno, Yoshiaki Nishikawa, Patrick Kasasa and Andrew Mushita
SUMMARY T he number of community seed banks is rapidly increasing, in response to the growing demand for greater diversity ness-raising. In several countries, education and training are among the key activities, of- ten focused on crop improvement and par- of crop genetic resources among farmers ticipatory plant breeding. Collaboration with and gardeners around the world. Two ma- plant breeders and scientists is becoming jor studies shed light on this development, more frequent. enabling a closer look at the differing ap- Key elements in ensuring sustainability for proaches, methods, outreach and achieve- community seed banks include capacity ments. These studies were presented and development to ensure management qua- illustrated with examples at a side-event at lity; self-financing systems to reduce depen- the Seventh Session of the Governing Body dence on external funding; enabling legal of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic and political framework conditions to ensure Resources for Food and Agriculture (Plant sufficient legal space and political support; Treaty) in Kigali, Rwanda, in 2017, aimed at enabling social structures among those in- sharing experiences. This report presents volved; satisfactory physical infrastructure; the contents of the side-event as well as key and systematic planning processes with ef- decisions from the Governing Body Session fective operational mechanisms. of relevance for community seed banks. The findings were illustrated with examples The first community seed banks were es- from Japan, Uganda, Zimbabwe and Nepal, tablished in the 1970s in the Global North highlighting the rich diversity of community and Australia, mainly in the form of seed-sa- seed banks globally, and of the crop genetic ver networks, later in various organizational resources they maintain. forms. They evolved as grassroots initiatives from networks or organizations of farmers Resolutions adopted at the Seventh Session or gardeners. In the Global South, commu- of the Governing Body of the Plant Treaty nity seed banks emerged in the late 1980s, mark the increasing awareness among the established with the support of international Contracting Parties of the value and impor- and national NGOs. Since 2000, their num- tance of community seed banks in fulfilling bers have been increasing rapidly. Commu- the objectives of the Plant Treaty on the nity seed banks contribute importantly to the conservation and sustainable use of crop global genetic heritage by conserving and genetic diversity for food security. The Go- making available an impressive range of crop verning Body invites the countries that are varieties and populations that may else have Contracting Parties to promote sustainable been lost. biodiverse production systems and facilitate participatory approaches such as commu- Traditionally, the main objective of a seed nity seed banks, along with a range of other bank has been to save and exchange local supportive measures. A central question is seeds. However, today’s community seed how these resolutions will be followed up in banks vary: some are most concerned with practice among the Contracting Parties. The conservation; others with seed multiplica- report ends by highlighting how DIVERSI- tion, access and availability; whereas others FOOD follows up on this question. focus on seed/ food sovereignty and aware-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS T he side-event on which this report is based was initiated by the Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Norway, on behalf of the European Union Horizon 2020 project Embedding crop diversity and networking for local high-quality food systems (DIVERSIFOOD). It was conducted in collaboration with Bioversity International and Local Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development (LI-BIRD), Nepal. The side-event received financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 633571, through DIVERSIFOOD, as well as from the project Strengthening National Capacities to implement the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA), funded by the Directorate-General for International Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Nether- lands. Additional technical support was provided by the CGIAR Research Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). The contributions of four of the panel participants were made possible thanks to travel support from the Development Fund of Norway, Oxfam Novib of the Netherlands and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant number 17H04627). Thanks are also due to Ronnie Vernooy and Evelyn Clancy of Bioversity International for their assistance with the side-event and input to this report. Finally, we wish to acknowledge the many people behind the community seed banks around the world and the organizations supporting them, for their vital contributions to maintaining crop genetic diversity and making it available for present and future generations. 4
CONTENTS SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 PART I: PRESENTATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1. Community Seed Banks: Origins, Evolution and Prospects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.1 About the book Community Seed Banks: Origins, Evolution and Prospects. . . . . . . . . 7 1.2 The history of community seed banks.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1.3 Organization of community seed banks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.4 How community seed banks work – and aspects of their sustainability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2. The Rapid Growth of Community Seed Banks in Europe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1 About DIVERSIFOOD.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.2 About the survey on community seed banks in Europe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.3 Key elements of community seed banks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.4 A brief history of community seed banks in Europe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.5 The community seed banks participating in the survey – some key features. . . . . . . 12 2.6 Crops available in community seed banks and where they come from. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.7 Achievements, barriers and strengths. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.8 Summarizing the findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3. Community Seed Banks in Japan.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 4. Community Seed Banks in Uganda. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 5. Community Seed Banks in Zimbabwe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 6. Community Seed Banks in Nepal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 PART II: OUTCOME OF THE SEVENTH SESSION OF THE TREATY’S GOVERNING BODY FOR COMMUNITY SEED BANKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 1. Decisions on Farmers’ Rights relevant for community seed banks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2. Decisions on sustainable use of relevance for community seed banks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3. The role of DIVERSIFOOD with regard to the Plant Treaty – with a view to community seed banks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 ATTACHMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 5
INTRODUCTION T he rapid development of community seed banks throughout the world is increasingly contributing to the conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic diversity, and thus to the implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agri- culture (the Plant Treaty).1 Community seed banks evolve in response to the growing demand for access to a greater diversity of crop genetic resources among farmers and gardeners and to ensure seed security in remote areas. They are often linked with other activities aimed at enhancing crop diversity and with other objectives, such as food sovereignty and the em- powerment of farmers. A many-faceted movement is taking shape. Two major studies shed light on this development in the North and the South, enabling a closer look at the differing approaches, methods, outreach and achievements, thereby sha- ring experiences: Community Seed Banks: Origins, Evolution and Prospects2 from Bioversity International,3 and a survey on community seed banks in Europe4 by the EU Horizon 2020 project DIVERSIFOOD.5 These studies were presented and illustrated with examples at a side event at the Seventh Session of the Governing Body of the Plant Treaty in Kigali, Rwanda, on 1 November 2017: ‘Community Seed Banks: Sharing experiences from North and South’. The side event was co-organized by DIVERSIFOOD, the Fridtjof Nansen Institute of Norway,6 Bioversity International and LI-BIRD, Nepal.7 The side event gathered about 45 participants.8 There might have been many more, but a contact group negotiating the Governing Body’s decisions on Farmers’ Rights had been or- ganized in parallel, and attracted many people interested in both topics. This report highlights the key contents of the side event, to enable broader sharing of experiences among stakehol- ders and researchers interested in community seed banks. It also presents key decisions from this Seventh Session of the Governing Body of the Plant Treaty and discusses the op- portunities of these decisions for the further development of community seed banks. © Mariko Chiaki Hamaguchi © Pitambar Shrestha 1- http://www.fao.org/plant-treaty/en/ Left picture: 2- https://www.bioversityinternational.org/e-library/publications/detail/community-seed-banks-origins-evolution-and-prospects/ 3- https://www.bioversityinternational.org/ Participants at the side event 4- Soon available at: http://www.communityseedbanks.org/ Right picture: 5- http://www.diversifood.eu/ Presenters at the side event 6- https://www.fni.no/ 7- http://www.libird.org/ 8- See the invitation with program in Attachment 1 to this report. 6
I: PRESENTATIONS 1. COMMUNITY SEED BANKS: ORIGINS, EVOLUTION AND PROSPECTS © USC Canada PITAMBAR SHRESTHA, LI-BIRD, ON BEHALF OF BIOVERSITY INTERNATIONAL9 Regassa Feyissa, a pioneer of community seed banks in Ethiopia, is inspecting sorghum Community seed banks first appeared 1.1 ABOUT THE BOOK in the Global South in the late 1980s, established with the support of interna- COMMUNITY SEED tional and national non-governmental BANKS: ORIGINS, organizations. Countries that pionee- EVOLUTION AND red various types of community seed PROSPECTS banks include Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nicaragua, the Despite 25 years of history and the Philippines and Zimbabwe. rapid growth in the number, organiza- tional diversity and geographical cove- In the Global North and Australia, a rage of community seed banks, reco- specific type of community seed banks gnition of their roles and contributions emerged: seed-savers’ networks. has remained surprisingly scanty. Com- Such networks were first established munity Seed Banks: Origins, Evolution in Australia, Canada, the UK and the and Prospects, edited by Ronnie Ver- USA, mainly from the 1980s, and later nooy, Pitambar Shrestha and Bhuwon spread to other countries. Sthapit,10 and published by Bioversity Community seed banks have grown International and Earthscan, is the first in number and diversity. In Nepal, for to provide a global overview of the de- example, there are now more than velopment of community seed banks. 100 self-described community seed It includes a wide range of case studies banks whose functions range from from around the world, reviewing their pure conservation to commercial seed history, evolution, experiences, suc- production. In Brazil, community seed cesses and failures, and the reasons banks operate in various regions of the why, as well as challenges and pros- country, to mention another example. pects. Thus it fills a significant gap in the literature on agricultural biodiversity © Regine Andersen/FNI and conservation, and their contribu- tion to food sovereignty and security. From a community seed bank 9 - The powerpoint-presentation of Pitambar Shrestha is attached to this report as Attachment 2. at Bohol, the Philippines 10 - Sadly, Bhuwon Sthapit passed away in August 2017. 7
An important background to the book 1.2 THE HISTORY OF was a seminar on community seed banks, held in Nepal in 2012.11 At this seminar, COMMUNITY SEED which covered the experience of a wide BANKS range of community seed banks in Ne- The concept of community seed bank pal, Ronnie Vernooy presented a review dates back to 1986, when it first appeared of community seed banks in various parts in the literature. The Rural Advancement of the world. Bhuwon Sthapit offered a Foundation (RAFI)12 produced a booklet thorough theoretical framework for ana- that pioneered the term community seed lysing community seed banks, based on bank.13 a literature review, and Pitambar Shres- tha with colleagues highlighted how such In 1989, the Seeds of Survival (SoS) pro- community seed banks can contribute to gramme was initiated in Ethiopia by USC greater local-level access to diverse types Canada14 in collaboration with the Institute of quality seeds. The three later decided of Biodiversity Conservation in Ethiopia,15 to develop this into a systematic review to rebuild farmers’ seed systems that of community seed banks, resulting in the were affected by drought and famine. This book Community Seed Banks: Origins, provided the basis for establishing com- Evolution and Prospects. munity seed banks in Ethiopia based on the ideas presented in the RAFI booklet. This book covers 35 case studies from 22 countries. It examines the origins and In 1992, Southeast Asia Regional Initia- evolution of community seed banks, their tives for Community Empowerment (SEA- functions and activities, governance and RICE)16 set up the Community-based Na- management, technical issues, support tive Seeds Research Centre (CONSERVE) and networking, policy and legal environ- as a non-profit organization in the Philip- ment, sustainability and prospects for the pines.17 Its flagship programme involved future. the conservation and development of crop genetic resources at the commu- nity level – including collection, conser- vation, research, development and utili- zation of these resources in partnership with farmers. Supported by SEARICE, CONSERVE initiated the first community seed bank in the Philippines.18 Around 1992, also the Chile-based NGO Centro de Educación y Tecnología (CET)19 started establishing community seed banks in several Latin American coun- tries, and various types were started throughout Brazil. Also at this time, the Bangladeshi NGO UBINIG (Unnayan Bikalper Nitinirdharoni Gobeshona, Po- licy Research for Development Alterna- tives)20 started establishing community seed banks named as ‘Community Seed Wealth Centres’. © Pratap Shrestha(LI-BIRD These were the roots of the community seed bank movement in the South. The main objective of a seed bank has tra- Four cell analysis of seeds in a 11 - The proceedings are available at: https://www.bioversityinternational.org/uploads/ Nepalese community seed bank tx_news/Community_seed_banks_in_Nepal__past__present_and_future_1642.pdf 12 - Now ETC-Group, http://www.etcgroup.org/ 13 - For more about the Community Seed Bank Resource Kit from RAFI see http://rafiusa.org/blog/tbt-community-seed-bank-resource-kit/ 14 - http://www.usc-canada.org/ 15 - Now Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute: http://www.ebi.gov.et/ 16 - https://searice.org.ph/ 17 - See also Regine Andersen, Terresita Borromeo and Nestor Altoveros (2013) ‘A community registry in the Philippines’ in: Regine Andersen and Tone Winge (eds) Realising Farmers’ Rights to Crop Genetic Resources – Success Stories and Best Practices, Abingdon: Routledge, p. 83. 18 - Republished as paperback in 2017. 19 - This is also documented in Regine Andersen (2008) Governing Agrobiodiversity – Plant Genetics and Developing Countries, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 250 http://www.diversidadbioculturalyterritorios.org/pg.base.php?id=19&lang=es 8 I: PRESENTATIONS 20 - http://www.ubinig.org/
ditionally been to save and exchange local Thus far, most community seed banks in seeds, keeping them under the sovereignty the Global South have been initiated by in- of the community and its farmers. However, ternational or national NGOs. In some cases community seed banks differ in the em- they are supported by the national govern- phasis of their objectives. Some are most ments, as in Nepal, Uganda and India. Some concerned with conservation, others with community seed banks have been initiated access and availability in connection with by governments, as in Mexico, Bhutan and conservation, and others also focus on seed South Africa, whereas others are not sup- and food sovereignty. ported by any policy or legal instruments, as in Sri Lanka. In general, community seed banks do not have strong governmental po- 1.3 ORGANIZATION OF licy and legal support. COMMUNITY SEED BANKS There is great variation in the governance 1.4 HOW COMMUNITY and management of community seed banks: SEED BANKS WORK – • basic level without key elements of formal AND ASPECTS OF THEIR governance (as in Rwanda and Bolivia) SUSTAINABILITY • governed by a board of volunteers and managed as a seed network based on The technical aspects of community seed membership (as in Brazil, Honduras, Mali, banks diverge widely. Seeds are normal- Mexico, Spain, Trinidad, the USA) ly regenerated annually, but the methods used differ. Seed-storage methods and • governed by an elected committee with techniques range from traditional to modern transparent operational plans and guided technologies. Some community seed banks by locally developed rules and regulatory are poorly equipped with the necessary phy- frameworks (as in Bangladesh, Costa sical infrastructure. There is also great diver- Rica, Nepal, Nicaragua and Zimbabwe) sity as to their involvement in related activities • governed by an ideology of free access, like participatory methods of crop manage- open source, seed sovereignty (as in ment and participatory plant breeding. Canada) For community seed banks to be sustai- • controlled by the state/public sector (as in nable, certain key elements have proven China and Bhutan). particularly important. Capacity develop- ment of involved people is essential, to en- sure management quality. It is also impor- tant to develop a model for self-financing, to reduce dependence on external funding sources; and to have an enabling legal and political framework so that community seed banks are legally recognized and protected and there is sufficient legal space for them to perform their tasks. Social structures and physical infrastructure are two crucial fac- tors. Finally, systematic planning processes and the development of effective operational mechanisms can be decisive. © UBING Seed hut members exchange seeds, Bangladesh 9
2. THE RAPID GROWTH OF COMMUNITY SEED BANKS IN EUROPE REGINE ANDERSEN, FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE, NORWAY, ON BEHALF OF DIVERSIFOOD AND ARCHE NOAH, AUSTRIA21 22 In Europe, community seed banks are 2.1 ABOUT DIVERSIFOOD being established at a rapid pace, and there are at least 130 initiatives as of DIVERSIFOOD is a multi-actor project 2017. Why is this happening? What is the under the EU Horizon 2020 framework motivation? Who are the initiators? How programme for research for the period do these initiatives develop? What are 2015–2019.23 The project connects their successes and failures, their stren- networks and actors in Europe engaged gths and weaknesses? What is needed in cultivated crop genetic diversity along to support the movement for the future? the whole value chain. It is based on mul- The questions are many, and they were ti-disciplinary research and participatory all taken up in a comprehensive survey methods. The project has been developed from the EU Horizon 2020 project DIVER- as an arena for exchange of experiences SIFOOD. and dialogue on issues related to the ma- nagement of crop genetic resources in Europe, supported by research. DIVERSI- FOOD has 21 partners from 12 countries in Europe, including organizations involved in seed management and farming as well as research institutions and organizations involved in technical support and commu- nication. DIVERSIFOOD aims to develop new ap- proaches to plant breeding in order to enhance crop genetic diversity in Europe, including through the further development of participatory plant breeding methods. A further central aim is to contribute to inno- vative biodiversity management practices and to ensuring the required legal space for such practices in Europe. Ultimately the project seeks to contribute to the diversity of healthy and tasty food products with market potential, with a focus on organic food. The project also aims to contribute new tools and communication methods that can bring actors together to achieve © Johannes Hloch common goals.24 Serving diversity at Arche Noah, 21: At the side event, this presentation was delivered by Gloria Otieno from Bioversity International, because Regine Andersen had been called Austria to serve as a co-chair of the Contact Group that was established by the Governing Body of the Plant Treaty to negotiate its decisions on Farmers’ Rights during its Seventh Session. The first meeting of the Contact Group was held in parallel with the side event. Many thanks to Gloria Otieno, for stepping in at such short notice and for chairing the side event! 22: The powerpoint-presentation of Regine Andersen is attached to this report as Attachment 3. 23: The project has received funding from the EU’s H2020 Programme under grant agreement n° 633571. 24: For more information, see: www.diversifood.eu 10 I: PRESENTATIONS
2.2 ABOUT THE SURVEY munity seed banks in Europe emerged, in- cluding their contribution to the management ON COMMUNITY SEED of crop genetic diversity, as well as possible BANKS IN EUROPE strategies to strengthen this region-wide de- velopment.25 Several studies on community seed banks in the South have been conducted, but less is On behalf of DIVERSIFOOD, Arche Noah has known about community seed banks in Eu- established a website to communicate the rope, which is why DIVERSIFOOD undertook results from the study and enable further the survey. At the outset we did not even communication on, and exchange of infor- know how many initiatives there were in Eu- mation and knowledge among the commu- rope. We developed a questionnaire that was nity seed banks across Europe and beyond.26 distributed to the initiatives and networks we A report from the survey and related activities knew about, inviting them to pass it on to all is currently under development and will be initiatives they knew about. The result was published in 2018. The side-event presen- impressive: 85 community seed banks in tation was aimed at highlighting key findings Europe responded to the survey. Moreover, from the survey. Further details can be found information on further initiatives indicated in the power point presentation attached to that at least 50 more have been established this report. in Europe. Thus, there are at least 135 com- munity seed banks in Europe, of which 85 participated in the survey. There may be va- rious reasons why the remaining around 50 2.3 KEY ELEMENTS OF community seed banks did not participate – COMMUNITY SEED BANKS like scarce capacity, language difficulties, or the length of the questionnaire, which was Community seed banks around the world quite comprehensive. Nevertheless, having are highly diverse, so it is challenging to de- received responses from 85 community fine the concept on a general basis without seed banks, we can now shed some light on excluding promising initiatives. However, the questions raised above. they tend to share certain aspects, which may be taken as some of the key elements The questionnaire survey was conducted that describe community seed banks. by Arche Noah, Austria, led by Beate Koller, with DIVERSIFOOD partners contributing to First of all, a community seed bank will nor- the methodology, as well as implementation. mally have somewhere to store seeds and/ The book Community Seed Banks: Origins, or propagating material or to grow plant col- Evolution and Prospects (presented above) lections in order to conserve, maintain and provided valuable background for develo- make available seeds and/or propagating ping the questionnaire. The results were pre- material. This is at the core of any commu- sented at a seminar organized together with nity seed bank, although this function is so- the Secretariat of the Plant Treaty and Bio- metimes decentralized. versity International at the FAO headquarters Second, most community seed banks are in Rome in September 2017. A preparatory jointly managed by the people involved, workshop was held the day before the se- whether as an informal network or a registe- minar, to discuss the results with represen- red organization or a cooperative with more tatives of central community seed banks than one member. in Europe, so as to develop an analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and Further, they usually work on a non-profit threats (SWOT) concerning community seed basis, and are normally part of the informal, banks. During the two days of seminar ac- or semi-informal seed system, often with tivity, a rich picture of the diversity of com- roots in civil society. 25: For more information and access to the presentations, see: http://www.communityseedbanks.org/events/ 26: See: www.communityseedbanks.org 11
And finally, the members of a community Garden Organic in the UK was established seed bank usually follow joint objectives, in 1975 and was probably the first seed based on shared values and rules, the- savers initiative in Europe. Other early reby often creating their own culture and seed saving networks were established in identity. the 1980ies in the North – based in the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Swe- den and Germany – and primarily among 2.4 A BRIEF HISTORY gardeners. In the 1990s new initiatives were established in Ireland, Germany, the OF COMMUNITY SEED Czech Republic, Greece and Spain. The BANKS IN EUROPE real growth of community seed banks started after 2000, after 2005 in particular, The community seed bank movement with new community seed banks emer- dates back to the 1980s, and was par- ging particularly in France, Spain, Italy and ticularly strong in the South. Community Greece. seed banks were established with varying forms and functions, often with assistan- Due to the size of the movement in Eu- ce from national, regional or international rope, and the fact that these community non-governmental organizations. Origi- seed banks maintain and make available nally, the core objectives were to conserve a wide diversity of crop varieties and po- and maintain plant genetic diversity and pulations that could otherwise be lost, provide access for farmers who could the community seed bank movement re- not obtain the necessary seeds or pro- presents an important contribution to the pagating material through the formal seed conservation and sustainable use of crop sector. The community seed banks of the genetic diversity in Europe. In Europe, as South were often linked to participatory elsewhere in the world, community seed methods for management and breeding banks help implementing the Plant Treaty. of plant varieties and plant populations. Community seed banks in Europe have evolved as grassroots initiatives from 2.5 THE COMMUNITY networks or organizations of farmers or SEED BANKS gardeners. The Heritage Seed Library of PARTICIPATING IN THE SURVEY – SOME KEY FEATURES The 85 community seed banks that res- ponded to the questionnaire survey cover most countries in Europe. We have sorted them into three groups, on the basis of similarities and the number of initiatives. These are some central features: The Iberia Group (Spain and Portu- gal): Spain is the European country with the highest number of community seed © Réseau Semences Paysannes banks (29) and with a rapidly evolving mo- vement. We have included one commu- nity seed bank from Portugal in this group, bringing the total to 30 community seed banks. Their motivations and activities Celebrating the founding of Réseau Semences Paysannes in France with a mandala of seeds 12 I: PRESENTATIONS
differ from other countries, so they were de- and producing seed. Today conservation as fined as one group in the survey. Community such is regarded as less important, com- seed banks of this Iberia Group have largely pared to the importance of awareness rai- been founded by farmers’ groups. Whereas sing, like in the Iberia Group. The countries conservation was initially the main objective of the Central Europe Group focus on edu- for the community seed banks, the focus cation and training often targeted at crop im- today is on raising awareness of the impor- provement and participatory plant breeding. tance of crop diversity and self-sufficiency Community seed banks from this group re- in seeds for food sovereignty, and control port the highest level of interaction with pro- of the means of agricultural production. The ducers such as farmers and horticulturalists. most important activity in the Iberia Group They also show the highest level of interac- is seed multiplication and to make seeds tion with breeders and scientists, aimed at and propagating material available. These improving and developing material; notably, community seed banks have extensive inte- they also engage in participatory plant bree- raction with gardeners, mainly with a view to ding. And, as in the Iberia Group, private enhancing the diversity of crop varieties in gardeners are also important for community the collections, in order to make them more seed banks in the Central Europe Group. widely available. Other European Countries: This grou- The Central Europe Group (France, Italy, ping, which is slightly larger than the other Luxembourg and Belgium): France is the groups in terms of number of initiatives, second largest country in terms of the nu- shows many similarities among community mber of community seed banks (17) and seed banks, particularly in the north and shares common aspects regarding moti- west of Europe. It includes initiatives in Aus- vation and activities with Italy (4), Luxem- tria (2), Switzerland (1), Czech Republic (2), bourg (2) and Belgium (1). With a total of 24 Germany (7), Denmark (1), Estonia (2), Great community seed banks, these countries Britain (2), Greece (1), Croatia (1), Hungary form another distinct group. As in the Ibe- (1), Ireland (1), Lichtenstein (1), the Nether- ria Group, the founders are largely farmers’ lands (2), Portugal (4) and Sweden (1), to- groups. Also in the Central Europe Group, talling 31 community seed banks. The conservation was initially a major objective; group might have been divided, and pe- but even more important were adapting and rhaps that will be done in the further analysis selecting/breeding varieties and populations of the data received. One characteristic of this group is that its community seed banks have most often been founded by garde- ners or their organizations (and not farmers’ groups). Conservation has remained the most important objective, although training and seed multiplication are also central ac- tivities. This group shows the highest level of interaction with external stakeholders, such as other gene banks. Also here, private gardeners provide important contributions. © Circulos de Sementes Children learn to value crop diversity at Circulos de Sementes, Portugal 13
2.6 CROPS AVAILABLE 2.7 ACHIEVEMENTS, IN COMMUNITY SEED BARRIERS AND BANKS AND WHERE STRENGTHS THEY COME FROM Community seed banks from all three The community seed banks in Europe co- groups report that their most important ver most crops. Some are specialized in a achievements are in the areas of training, few, others cover many crops. Altogether, education and awareness-raising. Also, these community seed banks report that involvement and participation achieve they maintain grains/cereals, potato, oil high scores from all three groups in terms seed, other field crops, leafy vegetables, of achievements. Additionally, the Iberia fruiting vegetables, tuber vegetables, le- Group and the Other European Coun- gumes, herbs, fruit trees, vines, nuts, or- tries Group report achievements in the namentals, wild plants and other crops. conservation of rare crops, whereas the Central Europe Group reports higher Local land-races and farmers’ varieties achievements in crop improvement. are dominant in all groups. Also, older Achievements in political work and ad- commercial varieties represent important vocacy are reported by the Iberia Group material in these community seed banks. as well as the Central Europe Group. The Community seed banks of the Central Eu- Central Europe Group also reports some rope Group also report that they maintain achievements with regard to research. own breeding material. All three groups report that the greatest The most important sources of seeds and strengths of their community seed banks propagating material are the founders and are the enthusiasm, the engagement and members of the community seed banks the endurance of their volunteers. Also themselves, and the farmers, gardeners important are the shared visions and va- and breeders with whom they exchange lues, the feeling of group power and col- material. Also, other gene banks represent lective action. Solidarity and friendship are a useful source of material for all groups. central values. In addition, the Other Eu- In addition, community seed banks of the ropean Countries Group emphasizes the Other European Countries Group report ability to improvise and be flexible: they that they to some extent engage in active find it essential to be independent and un- calls and field collections, and that they hampered by bureaucracy, in order to be also may include marketed seed. These resilient. Community seed banks of this features are less prominent in the other group also mention their good contacts two groups. with the media, state/public bodies and other networks and organizations as im- portant strengths. Community seed banks from all three groups note the lack of financial resources as a major obstacle. Lack of manpower comes next: in fact, the Iberia Group sees this as the greatest barrier, and it is also a considerable a problem for the Central Europe Group. A third difficulty reported © Red Andaluza de Semillas by all groups is the legal environment, which is largely considered obstructive. Displaying diversity for awareness rising in Andalusia, Spain 14 I: PRESENTATIONS
2.8 SUMMARIZING nies, but 25% are still informal. Most ope- rate on a non-profit basis, but some allow THE FINDINGS minor profits. There is also great variation in Community seed banks in Europe are available financial resources, as well as with many and diverse. They differ with regard to regard to aims, triggers, role-models and number per country and region, geographi- approaches. cal coverage and the thematic scope of their On the other hand, there are also similarities, activities. Some involve 10 members, others as we have tried to highlight in this presen- more than 10,000 persons. There is massive tation. variation in the number of crops they main- tain and how they go about doing this. Fur- In DIVERSIFOOD the evaluation of the ther, there are differences in methods and survey results as well as the results of the infrastructure, in organizational set-up and SWOT analysis continues, with a view to social structures. Most community seed identifying important factors that can stren- banks are set up as associations, founda- gthen the community seed- bank move- tions, cooperatives or limited liability compa- ment in Europe. 3. COMMUNITY SEED BANKS IN JAPAN YOSHIAKI NISHIKAWA, RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY, KYOTO, JAPAN27 In Japan there are many initiatives aimed vegetables and minor cereal varieties; in par- at keeping and distributing seeds of tradi- ticular, there is a huge diversity of Brassica tional crop varieties, with different types of species found in rural areas. People keep organization and outreach. Many groups seeds either individually or collectively, de- and communities keep seeds of traditional pending on how farmers perceive the best way of keeping diversity and maintaining the ideo-types of their varieties. In many cases, there is one farmer who saves seeds for the community, and when other farmers lose their own saved seeds, they may come to this farmer for new supply. The role can be inherited through households from father to son or through a decision by the commu- nity. The seeds are generally stored without major infrastructure, such as cold storage. These widespread customary practices may well be considered as representing a form of community seed banking, but the concept of ‘community seed banks’ as such is not yet familiar in Japan. Apart from such customary practices, there © Yoshiaki Nishikawa are several initiatives that have been deve- loped independently by various stakehol- Japanese dish with different local 27: The powerpoint-presentation of Yoshiaki Nishikawa is attached to this report as Attachment 4. vegetable varieties served at Awa 15
ders. Examples include seed exchange become actively involved in the conser- activities among organic farmers, as well vation and use of traditional vegetables as a local government-run gene bank and related knowledge. Students who at- in Hiroshima that provides farmers with tend agricultural courses at Katsura High seeds for loan – whereby farmers can ob- School now grow 14 different traditional tain seeds for cultivation and then return vegetables from local seeds; they harvest the same amount to the gene bank after the seeds, clean them, store them, and harvest, facilitating farmers’ rights in rural can distribute them to producers in the areas of Hiroshima Prefecture.28 A very neighbourhood. Technical support from interesting example is the multi-faceted teachers and nearby research institutes organization ‘Awa’ (millet in Japanese) in are indispensable in this conservation Nara Prefecture near Kyoto. Awa has a work. The students utilize this opportunity non-profit entity working for conservation for their education to get hands-on expe- of the traditional-crop gene pool. It also rience of the local culture and traditional has a farmers’ production group for ve- varieties. getable sales and community vitalization Community seed-bank activities in Japan through income generation, and operates are indeed diverse. They range from tra- a restaurant (for profit) to ensure the sus- ditional community-based seed saving tainability of the organization’s activities. to newly established initiatives of various Many stakeholders are involved, as pro- kinds, as exemplified above. Apart from viders of materials and also as restaurant grassroots activities initiated mainly by lo- staff.29 cal farmers, residents and local institutions As a unique initiative in Japan, school ac- without much outside intervention, there tivities have been introduced to maintain are also some seed-saving networks loo- crop genetic diversity. Kyoto, the ancient sely connected with the global movement capital of Japan, has a wealth of traditio- of seed savers, and which have roots in nal vegetables, but many are cultivated Japan’s own cultural and spiritual heri- by only a few farmers, and seeds are no tage. Peace Seed,30 founded in 2000 longer harvested regularly, as the farmers by Mariko Hamaguchi and Norihito Arai, are elderly. Although reluctant to give their maintains over 500 varieties of rice, as seeds to government gene banks, some well as many herbs and vegetables. Its farmers are willing to entrust seed-sa- co-directors have drawn inspiration from ving work to secondary school students, the Australian seed-saver movement and to encourage the younger generation to Japan’s tradition of natural farming. The Shumei Natural Agriculture Network31 is unusual in having a rather formal organi- zational set-up, and basing their work on the teachings of a spiritual leader, Oka- da Mokichi, on natural farming.32 This network has more than 1,700 members, who select their own seeds, offering them as thanksgiving at their Shinto style Shrine and receiving the seeds from the shrine for the next season. Community seed-bank activities in Japan have not yet been coordinated as a na- tionwide movement. Their decentralized © Yoshiaki Nishikawa and uncoordinated nature is due mainly to the considerable geographic and climatic Obsolete lotus varieties kept 28: See Yoshiaki Nishikawa and Tone Winge (2013): ‘The Hiroshima Agricultural Gene Bank: Re-introducing local varieties, maintaining traditional by students in Kyoto, Japan knowledge’. In: Regine Andersen and Tone Winge (eds): Realising Farmers’ Rights to Crop Genetic Resources – Success Stories and Best Practices. Abingdon: Routledge, pp 167 – 178. 29: https://www.kiyosumi.jp/ (in Japanese). 30: https://www.facebook.com/PEACE-SEED-187208888138775/ 31: https://www.shumei-na.org/ (English) and http://www.snn.or.jp/about/about_index.html (Japanese) 32: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_Farming 16 I: PRESENTATIONS
variations in the country, which also form the nature and broad diversity of community basis for wide-ranging cultural diversity, as seed bank activities in Japan stand out as a well as due to the greatly differing charac- unique feature, as compared to similar acti- teristics of seed-bank initiatives. The special vities elsewhere in the world. 4. COMMUNITY SEED BANKS IN UGANDA GLORIA OTIENO, BIOVERSITY INTERNATIONAL33 Community seed banks in Uganda are still also provided back-up of community collec- few, although the number of community tions. Further, the national gene bank has seed banks and related initiatives has in- provided technical support in conservation creased from only one in 2008 to four in and management of community collections 2017, with a fifth one to be established in through training programmes. The commu- early 2018. These community seed banks nity seed banks have received training in the have been established thanks to techni- production of Quality Declared Seed (QDS) cal and financial support from Bioversity and are currently producing QDS of two va- International through various projects in rieties of beans. partnership with the National Agricultural Annual seed fairs are held at the community Research Organization – Plant Genetic Re- seed-bank locations, and exchange of seeds sources Centre (NARO-PGRC). They have and knowledge is encouraged between and been formed in response to local needs to among farmers. The community seed banks access a wide range of diverse seeds and have also been used as learning platforms to conserve traditional varieties for future for training farmers in seed production, sto- use. These community seed banks are lin- rage, preservation, community seed-bank ked to the national gene bank of Uganda, management and conservation. which has not only helped to restore lost lo- cal varieties by providing repatriation of ger- One example is the Kiziba community gene mplasm from its ex-situ collections but has bank. It was established in 2008 as a joint © Gloria Otieno © Gloria Otieno Bean diversity at a seed fair of the 33: The powerpoint-presentation of Gloria Otieno is attached to this report as attachment 5. Kiziba community seed bank, Uganda Entering the Kiziba community seed bank, Uganda 17
initiative between farmers and scientists and knowledge exchange are key compo- who were promoting the use of bean di- nents of the project. Kenya and Tanzania versity as a means of controlling pests and have prominent seed-savers’ networks diseases. The local community provided and community seed exchange networks the land; Bioversity International and the which facilitate the access to and ex- National Agricultural Research Organiza- change of genetic resources among tion (NARO) contributed by constructing farmers. In Kenya, for instance, farmers the building that houses the community have an umbrella network of Seed Savers seed bank. The Kiziba community seed operating in many areas. These networks bank currently serves over 1000 farmers, also include women seed savers who are providing seeds of 70 varieties of beans. trained in the production of quality seed Initially, the community had only 13 va- and who work to conserve seeds of tra- rieties of beans; the other varieties came ditional varieties. In Tanzania, farmers’ from other communities in Uganda, and seed-exchange networks are particularly some were provided by the national gene important for women, and custodian far- bank. Members of the Kiziba community mers play a crucial role in providing seeds seed bank have been trained in QDS pro- of new varieties as well as of traditional duction; having obtained certification, they landraces. Acknowledgement of the im- have started selling QDS-certified seeds portance of custodian farmers is shown locally. This community seed bank is now by the training programmes and ex- being used as a learning platform for the change programmes offered to them, as creation of other community seed banks well as the recognition accorded to them in Uganda and neighbouring countries.34 in national fora. For example, Bioversity International and Uganda’s community seed banks are also the National Agricultural Research Orga- linked with research and development. nization of Uganda are jointly implemen- Farmers have been involved in participa- ting community seed bank activities with tory varietal evaluation and selection for support from the Benefit Sharing Fund climate-change adaptation: over 360 far- of the Plant Treaty, as part of the project mers were involved in selecting varieties ‘Promoting open source seed systems of sorghum, millet and beans to meet cli- of forages, legumes, millet and sorghum mate-related challenges, such as drought for climate change adaptation in Kenya, and early maturity. Uganda and Tanzania’. Capacity building 5. COMMUNITY SEED BANKS IN ZIMBABWE PATRICK KASASA AND ANDREW MUSHITA, COMMUNITY TECH- NOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TRUST, ZIMBABWE35 The Community Technology Development ver ten districts, thanks to the support of Trust (CTDT) has initiated and supported partners such as Oxfam Novib, HIVOS, community seed-banking initiatives for the Development Fund and SwedBio, to almost 23 years. The initiatives were ini- mention a few. In all ten districts, commu- tially located in three districts but now co- nity-level seed-saving initiatives contribute 34: For further information, see: https://www.bioversityinternational.org/news/detail/increasing-access-to-quality-and-diverse-seed-a-journey- to-the-kiziba-community-seedbank/ 35: The powerpoint-presentation Patrick Kasasa and Andrew Mushita is attached to this report as Attachment 6. 18 I: PRESENTATIONS
to the conservation, restoration, revitaliza- • promote knowledge and seed exchange, tion, strengthening and improvement of local and local experimentation by farmers seed-supply systems, with the main focus • facilitate the introduction of improved and on local varieties. climate-resilient varieties, for greater food The 1991/1992 drought that ravaged sou- and nutrition security thern Africa, and was declared a national di- • contribute to the strengthening and saster in Zimbabwe, proved instrumental in improvement of integrated farmers’ seed the establishment of community seed banks systems there. Most farmers lost their traditional crop • increase awareness of agricultural varieties during that drought. In 1998, with biodiversity conservation and the experience of the drought still in mind, management, diversity within crop the CTDT, in consultation with government species and the role of germplasm agencies and farmer communities, esta- exchange blished a pilot project of three community • hold seed fairs annually at each seed banks in the districts of Uzumba-Ma- community seed bank, to facilitate seed ramba-Pfungwe, Tsholotsho and Chiredzi. banking, and exchange of seeds and Seven additional community seed banks knowledge. have since been constructed, bringing the total number of community seed banks in Within the community seed bank itself, seed Zimbabwe to ten. The main objectives of all is stored in three separate rooms: general these community seed banks are to: storage, bulk storage and the family collection • ensure on-farm conservation and rooms. Community seed bank members are sustainable use of plant genetic provided with membership cards that allow resources for food and agriculture, them to deposit seed in the general or family including local neglected and collection sections/rooms of the community underutilized plants seed bank. Seed from on-farm seed pro- • facilitate easy access to seeds of choice duction plots and from Farmer Field Schools by smallholder farmers may be stored in the bulk or general storage rooms. All members of the community seed • contribute to the availability and banks have equal access to the seed stored exchange of ecologically adaptive seeds in these facilities. They are required to provi- to farmers de evidence of their membership each time • provide opportunities for crop they need a service from the facility. Com- diversification munity seed bank members are expected to take part in (i) on-farm seed production ac- tivities, normally arranged at nearby Farmer Field Schools (ii) seed fairs held annually at the CSBs and (iii) in training sessions orga- nized by the community seed bank manage- ment committees, government agricultural extension and CTDT staff. Seeds in the general and bulk storage rooms belong to all members of the community seed banks. They can access the seed free of charge. The bulk seed storage room is in- tended to serve as a seed reserve in case farmers lose their crops in the event of a drought, flood or other catastrophe. Seed in the bulk storage room can also be sold by the community seed bank management © CTDT From a community seed bank in Zimbabwe 19
committees to outsiders, making it pos- New collections are added to the Com- sible to generate income to continue its munity Biodiversity Register that is main- activities. However, also non-members, tained at the office of each community especially the most vulnerable such as el- seed bank. The following information is ders and orphans, may access the seed recorded in these biodiversity registers: free of charge, on the recommendation of • name of farmer the management committee — a social • national identification commitment agreed upon by members of or registration number each seed bank. Each community seed • name of village bank maintains a community biodiversity • community or ward number/name register and passport data of local crops • name of crop and variety and crop varieties stored and associated • date of collection traditional knowledge. These registers are • accession number monitored by the agricultural extension • shelf number staff; in some districts, CTDT staff also as- • germination percentage/rate sists. The annual seed and food fairs held • quantity of seed collected at each community seed bank serve as • name of person receiving the material. a further mechanism for maintaining and This information is also kept at CTDT head sharing local knowledge. office as a back-up system. As a contribu- The community seed bank committee tion to capacity building of elected com- works closely with CTDT field officers and munity seed bank committee members, local agricultural extension (AGRITEX) of- the CTDT has produced a community ficers to register participating farmers. seed banking manual for use by technical CTDT and staff of the National Gene Bank staff as well as farmer leaders.36 (NGB) of Zimbabwe work closely together Community seed banks provide farmers to assist farmers with all the modalities of with access to seeds not only of local seed banking. The two institutions help varieties but also of improved varieties farmers during germplasm collection and through participatory variety selection and deposition in the community seed banks. plant-breeding efforts. This includes ob- Duplicate samples of seeds are also taining access to (via the use of the Stan- stored in the NGB as back-up. In cases dard Material Transfer Agreements under where communities have lost some of the Plant Treaty) stable in-bred lines from their crop varieties, they request the NGB research institutes such as the Internatio- to repatriate these to the communities, nal Maize and Wheat Improvement Cen- which multiply the few seeds on the fields ter (CIMMYT), the International Crops Re- of experienced Farmer Field Schools. search Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) and the National Crop Breeding Institute. These organizations also offer assistance, such as technical training to farmers. Farmers benefit from advanced seed conservation technologies. The community seed bank collections are backed up by the extension service of AGRITEX, offering valuable services in cases of emergency. Zimbabwe’s community seed banks do more than conserving seeds: they also produce and sell them. Community-based seed production initiatives have come to © CTDT From a seed fair in Zimbabwe 36: The proceedings from a workshop on the CTDT Community Seed Banking Training Manual can be downloaded here: http://www.ctdt.co.zw/community-seed-banking-training-manual-3/. See also the CTDT Community-based seed production manual here: http://www.ctdt.co.zw/downloads-publications/ 20 I: PRESENTATIONS
play an important role in the seed supply sources Centre in Zambia has highlighted system of smallholder farmers. Locally pro- the success and relevance of community duced seed is sold to local farmers at affor- seed banks and is considering how the Zim- dable prices. Farmers can sell seeds within a babwean model can be replicated in other 40-km radius, in conformity with the national SADC member states. Community seed laws which allow the marketing of non-ins- banks receive support from the government pected seed within that radius. Through extension services, the national gene bank Farmer Field Schools, farmers work closely and the national crop breeding institute. The with researchers and extension service of- CTDT has been instrumental in securing ficers to further develop and improve their such support as part of its campaign for na- seeds through participatory action research tional recognition and implementation of the and participatory plant breeding. Plant Treaty. Currently there is no legal framework to pro- Over the years, the CTDT has facilitated the tect and support community seed banks in establishment of linkages with key players Zimbabwe. The CTDT has been working as summarized in Figure 1. with the Ministry of Agriculture to assemble The CTDT notes that: points for a draft Plant Genetic Resources • community seed banks are critical Bill for possible consideration by the relevant for agricultural biodiversity conservation authorities. Ideas being circulated include and sustainable use; supporting the operations of community seed banks through the introduction of a • community seed banks ensure farmers fund that could be used for supporting com- own control of the means of crop munity seed bank activities. Proposals also production; include a recommendation that the state • community seed banks ensure ready should provide support to communities/ access to quality seed that is farmers that have played significant roles cost-effective; in conserving and maintaining plant genetic • crop diversification is central for building resources, in order to provide incentives for resilience among farmers in the face further activities. of climate change Members of Parliament, traditional leaders, • community seed banks contribute to government ministries and farmer organiza- the implementation of the Plant Treaty, tions such as the Zimbabwe Farmers’ Union especially Article 6 (Sustainable Use) are all working with community seed bank and Article 9 (Farmers’ Rights). committees. The SADC Plant Genetic Re- Figure 1: Development pp National Local Partners Gene Bank Leadership Agric. Extension Regional Gene Community officers Bank SADC Seed Banks National Crop Improvement CG Centers Programme Universities Farmers 21
You can also read