Clinical Impact of New Data From Virtual ECCVID 2020 - Valean Darou
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Clinical Impact of New Data From Virtual ECCVID 2020 CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2020 Virtual European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Conference on Coronavirus Disease 2020 (ECCVID 2020); September 23-25, 2020 *CCO is an independent medical education company that provides state-of-the-art medical information to healthcare professionals through conference coverage and other educational programs.
About These Slides Please feel free to use, update, and share some or all of these slides in your noncommercial presentations to colleagues or patients When using our slides, please retain the source attribution: Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com These slides may not be published, posted online, or used in commercial presentations without permission. Please contact permissions@clinicaloptions.com for details
Faculty and Disclosure Information Barbara Rath, MD, PhD, HDR Co-founder & Chair The Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative Research Director Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France Honorary Professor Executive Board Member ESGREV (Respiratory Virus Study Group for ESCMID) Barbara Rath, MD, PhD, HDR, has no relevant conflicts of interest to report.
Outline Contact Tracing in Singapore Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 in Switzerland Cell-Based Culture of SARS-CoV-2 for Infectivity Determination Correlating Pathology With Viral Localization in Tissues and Cells Investigating COVID-19 Treatments Vaccine Updates Ethical Considerations for the Elderly in COVID-19 Social Determinants of Health in COVID-19
Contact Tracing in Singapore
Building Blocks of COVID-19 Management in Singapore Prevent: “safe management measures” in place to circumvent transmission, border control to reduce importation Detect: case finding and comprehensive surveillance, increased testing capacity (by > 10x) and capability Care: strengthened healthcare capacity and resources, invested in vaccine/treatment research and deployment Contain: enhanced contact tracing to find cases early and probe networks surrounding those cases, quarantine capacity and capability Lee. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Contact Tracing Mapping occurs in backward direction to discern the infection source and in forward direction to identify contacts subsequently exposed Lab alert of Movement and Query whether Engage Enact appropriate public positive interactions of case linked to contacts to health measures to halt COVID-19 test case patient known clusters confirm additional transmission events mapped via exposure and (ie, quarantine or phone interview assess health surveillance of contacts) Novel technologies being used in contact tracing efforts ‒ SafeEntry app with check-in at venues, CCTV records, geospatial-temporal mapping by IT analysts to identify clusters, TraceTogether token or app based on Bluetooth signals shared between users Lee. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Case Identification and Contact Tracing: Pairing Technologic and Manual Strategies SafeEntry data TraceTogether data Generation of first-cut of contacts, ~ 3 hrs COVID-19 Test Repository: Data fusion Single source of truth for Quarantine X all COVID-19 test results order issued Government Prefilled base activity map admin data to interview patients Lee. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Quarantine Logistics Electronic quarantine order (eQO) delivered via SMS, individual able to sign declaration form remotely ‒ Homer app then prompts quarantined individual to report temperature and health status every 3 hrs, reports GPS-based location every 5 mins Between April 1 and September 14, 2020, 18,757 persons quarantined based on exposure to 2325 community cases ‒ 337 individuals became subsequent cases after isolation Outcome Aug 23-29 Aug 30 - Sept 5 Sept 6-12 Total QOs, n 641 1060 617 Total eQOs issued, n (%) 607 (95) 873 (82) 566 (92) Homer app enrollment for monitoring, n 573 686 515 Lee. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Addition of Technologic Monitoring Reduces Time Needed to Pinpoint and Quarantine Contacts Manual Manual Plus Manual Plus Only VISION, SafeEntry VISION, SafeEntry, and TraceTogether 4 4 3.80 Weekly Moving Average Raise or Issue QO (Days) Time to Issue QO (Days) 3 2.79 2.71 3 Average Time to 2.90 2.47 2.20 2.01 2.08 2 2.31 2 1.73 1.76 1.88 1.83 1 1 0 0 Lee. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 in Switzerland
Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Inpatient Population in Basel, Switzerland All adult patients admitted to N = 4466 samples from 4099 patients University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, ‒ 25 (0.6%) positive for SARS-CoV-2 April 1 - June 14, 2020, were screened for SARS-CoV-2 within 72 hrs of ‒ Asymptomatic: 3722 (90.8%) patients admission ‒ 6 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 Asymptomatic vs symptomatic were asymptomatic determination made by retrospective ‒ 27% of all positive patients classification criteria: ‒ 0.16% of all asymptomatic patients ‒ Acute pulmonary symptoms ± Proportion of asymptomatic patients ‒ Fever ≥ 38.0°C ± among SARS-CoV-2 infected ‒ Sudden onset anosmia or ageusia ± remained similar over time even as overall prevalence dropped: ‒ Acute confusion/deterioration in elderly unless otherwise explained 21% in April, 33% in May Stadler. ECCVID 2020. Abstr 155. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Inpatient Population in Basel, Switzerland Systematic screening detected low but constant proportion of asymptomatic carriers ‒ Suggests unfavorable cost–benefit ratio of universal screening ‒ Supports need for universal infection prevention and control strategies Potential study limitations ‒ Patients classified retrospectively ‒ Unable to distinguish asymptomatic vs presymptomatic patients ‒ Restricted to inpatient population Stadler. ECCVID 2020. Abstr 155. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Cell-Based Culture of SARS-CoV-2 for Infectivity Determination
Cell-Based Culture of SARS-CoV-2 as Surrogate for Infectivity Methods: ICU Inpatients/ Outpatients Parameter Patients Non-ICU ‒ Culture all SARS-CoV-2 RNA+ samples (n = 5) (n = 12) (n =178) in Vero C1008 cells Avg age, yrs 58 43 40 ‒ Inspect daily for cytopathic effect Number of samples 11 42 181 Avg days from ‒ Confirm cytopathic effect by PCR of symptom onset to 7 7 12 cell culture supernatant sample collection Culture positive ‒ If no cytopathic effect by Day 4, and CPE, % 55 40 12 PCR of cell culture supernatant Culture positive 27 5 3 ‒ Positive culture: Ct value of cell and no CPE, % culture reduced by ≥ 3 cycles vs Total culture 82 45 15 positive, % original sample Ct value (determined to be equivalent to 1 log increase in viral quantity) Basile. ECCVID 2020. Abstr 68. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Cell-Based Culture of SARS-CoV-2 as Surrogate for Infectivity: Results SARS-CoV-2 Successfully Isolated Only From Samples With Ct Value < 32 100 45 100 90 40 90 Ct Values (N gene) % Culture Positive % Culture Positive 80 35 80 70 30 70 60 60 25 50 50 20 40 40 30 15 30 20 10 20 10 5 10 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 3628 38 40 Days Since Symptom Onset Days Since Symptom Onset Basile. ECCVID 2020. Abstr 68. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Correlating Pathology With Viral Localization in Tissues and Cells
Pathology Findings in COVID-19: Background COVID-19 spectrum in mainland China through February 11, 2020 (N = 44,415): 81% mild, 14% severe, 5% critical[1] Clinical–therapeutic staging proposed, based on successive disease states experienced during COVID-19: (1) early infection, (2) pulmonary phase, and (3) hyperinflammation phase[2] ‒ Antiviral, convalescent plasma use suggested throughout; immune-targeted therapeutics reserved for mid to late stages Diabetes, HTN, COPD, and coronary heart disease commonly occur in COVID-19 patients with severe disease, those requiring hospitalization[3,4] Endothelial cells hypothesized to play essential role in onset and maintenance of severe COVID-19 via vascular leakage, coagulation, and inflammation[5] 1. Wu. JAMA. 2020;323:1239. 2. Siddiqi. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39:405. 3. Guan. NEJM. 2020;382:1708. 4. Richardson. JAMA. 2020;323:2052. 5. Teuwen. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:389. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Signs of Endothelial Cell Disruption During COVID-19 Endotheliitis in the lung, small intestine, kidney, myocardium, and liver Small thrombi in the lung and small intestine with mesenteric ischemia Apoptosis of endothelial cells (measurable via caspase 3 staining) also prominent in the lung and small intestine Varga. ECCVID 2020. Varga. Lancet. 2020;395:1417. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Methodology for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in Tissue Method Sensitivity Turnaround Advantages Disadvantages “Classical” smear Good, depends on Short Postmortem tissue Not cell type specific (swabs) disease stage (up to 24 hrs) Triage autopsy Short Testing organ RT-PCR in FFPE High Not cell type specific (1-2 days) involvement Short Lab techniques demanding FISH and CISH in FFPE Low to medium Cell type specific (1-2 days) Fixation time dependent Short Background stain Immunohistochemistry Low to medium Cell type specific (1 day) Unequivocal signals Cell type specific (exact Lab techniques demanding Fluorescence-labeled Short Low to medium anatomical localization IF microscope immunohistochemistry (1 day) of signals) IF >>> IHC Lab techniques demanding Exact anatomical Long Time-consuming analysis Electron microscopy Low localization of virus-like (days to wks) Requires confirmation with particles immunoelectron microscopy Varga. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Broad Organotropism of SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2 detected by RT-PCR, in situ hybridization, and IHC/IF across organs in postmortem FFPE tissue samples[1-3] ‒ Localizes virus predominantly to the lung with lower concentrations observed in the heart, kidney, liver, spleen, brain, and blood ‒ EM also a valuable tool for visualizing viral infection[4] Pairing viral tropism data with morphologic findings may yield a better understanding of SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology 1. Puelles. NEJM. 2020;383:590. 2. Liu. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e139042. 3. Sekulic. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020;154:190. 4. Park. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35:e84. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Pulmonary Pathology: Progression During COVID-19 Pulmonary observations for 4 fatal COVID-19 cases in Tübingen, Germany[1] ‒ Early disease: neutrophilic, exudative capillaritis with microthrombosis, copious IL-1β and IL-6 ‒ Subsequently: diffuse alveolar damage, intravascular thrombosis in small/medium vessels, occasional infarction, lab features of DIC ‒ Late stages: organizing pneumonia with intraalveolar fibroblast proliferation, marked metaplasia of alveolar epithelium, mutiorgan failure Viral RNA present in the lung (eg, endothelial cells and pneumocytes)[1-3] Organ involvement coincident with clinical involvement/organ damage[1-3] 1. Bösmüller. Virchows Arch. 2020;477:349. 2. Schaller. JAMA. 2020;323:2518. 3. Skok. Virchows Arch. 2020;[Epub]. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Sporadic Discordance Between Swab Positivity, Organ Damage in Autopsy Data From COVID-19 Patients (Graz, AT) Patient Characteristic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Swab result Throat: first am Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Throat: last am Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Neg Pos Pos Pos Pos Neg Pos Throat: first pm Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Neg Pos Pos Neg Neg Neg Pos Right lung Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Neg Pos Pos Pos Neg Pos Pos Left lung Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Neg Pos Pos Neg Neg Pos Pos Colon - - - - - - - Pos Pos Neg Neg Neg Neg Pos Pos Pos Neg - Neg Lung damage Edema Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Hyaline membranes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Proliferation Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Thrombosis Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Infarction Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Bronchopneumonia No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Fibrosis No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Degree of damage Sev Sev Mod Mod Mod Sev Sev Sev Sev Sev Sev Sev Sev Mod Mod Mod Sev Mod Sev Ischemic bowel No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No changes Skok. Virchows Arch. 2020;[Epub]. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Investigating COVID-19 Treatments: Umifenovir
Umifenovir in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Iran Umifenovir: broad-spectrum antiviral (fusion inhibitor) used for influenza and other ARI in Russia and China; shown to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro[1] Study evaluated efficacy of umifenovir against COVID-19 in hospitalized, symptomatic patients in Iran[2] Control Regimen: Lopinavir/Ritonavir 400/100 mg BID for 10-14 days + Hydroxychloroquine 400 mg + Hospitalized adults with symptoms* Interferon-b1a 44 mg SC on Days 1,3,5 ≤ 14 days and peripheral capillary (n = 50) SpO2 ≤ 93% on pulse oximetry, respiratory frequency ≥ 24/min on ambient air Umifenovir 200 mg 3x/day for 10 days + (N = 101) Control regimen (n = 51) *At least one of: body temperature ≥ 37.5∘C, cough, shortness of breath, nasal congestion/discharge, myalgia/arthralgia, diarrhea/vomiting, headache, fatigue 1. Wang. Cell Discov. 2020;6:28. 2. Darazam. ECCVID 2020. Abstr. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Umifenovir in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Iran Umifenovir did not significantly improve time to clinical improvement, mortality, time on ventilation, or length of hospitalization 20 Control 18 Umifenovir + control 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Mortality Median Time on Median Hospital Stay, Time to Clinical Ventilation Median No. Improvement, Median Darazam. ECCVID 2020. Abstr. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Vaccine Updates
Development of Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 36 candidate vaccines in clinical Oxford vaccine: SARS-CoV-2 spike development, 146 in preclinical protein in nonreplicating chimpanzee stages[1] adenovirus (ChAdOx1)[3] Neutralizing antibody Anti–SARS-CoV-2 spike protein neutralizing antibody correlates with protection in macaques[2] 256 MNA IC80 Approaches under evaluation include 64 spike protein nanoparticles with Matrix M, spike protein mRNA in lipid 16 nanoparticles, spike protein DNA, Ch: N = 45 45 9 adenovirus vectors (Ad5, Ad26) Mn: N = 2 2 0 0 28 42 Day 1. https://www.eccvid.org/media-790-news-regarding-covid-19-vaccines. 2. Yu. Science 2020;369:806. 3. Pollard. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Clinical Trials International trial of Oxford vaccine: Development Timeline 6-12 Mos United Kingdom (19 sites), Brazil (6 Vaccine Animal sites), South Africa (6 sites) Design Studies Phase ‒ Phase II/III studies started at end of I/II GMP June: South Africa (6 sites, planned enrollment 2000); Brazil (3 sites, Phase I 1000 adults 18-55 yrs of age planned enrollment 10,000) Phase II 56 yrs+ Nonlinear trial progression with highly compressed time scale; first Phase III 10,000 > 18 yrs Phase III of age safety and immunogenicity data GMP coming in from several vaccines Upscale Licensure GMP Pollard. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Normal Vaccine Development in Comparison Development Timeline 5-10 Yrs Vaccine Animal Phase I/II Upscale Design Studies GMP Phase I Phase II Phase III GMP Phase III GMP Licensure Pollard. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Ethical Considerations for the Elderly in COVID-19
Considerations on Aging and COVID-19 Aging is heterogeneous with variable effects of genetic, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors[1] ‒ In 2018, 88% of persons ≥ 75 yrs of age in US had no limitation in activities of daily living[2] Potential for single trigger to cause disproportionate complications[3] ‒ Iatrogenic events, healthcare-associated infection, falls, malnutrition, immobilization or pressure sores, delirium or behavioral disorders, exacerbation of chronic disease Atypical COVID-19 presentation in older patients with sizeable rates of hospitalization and death; many infections arising in nursing homes[4,5] ‒ In context of stressed healthcare system, pushes clinicians to determine if age should be a primary criterion in medical care decision-making 1. Lowsky. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:640. 2. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/shs/tables.htm. 3. Clegg. Lancet. 2013;381:752. 4. Annweiler. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;[Epub]. 5. Zerah. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;[Epub]. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
COVID-19 in Nursing Homes or LTCFs in France Case fatality rate: 39% (14,214 resident deaths among 36,857 cases) Outcome* Among Residents Among Staff Confirmed cases 36,857 17,975 Hospital deaths 3771 NR Establishment deaths 10,443 NR *Among 6267 reports for EHPA. Gavazzi. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Adapting Logistics of Medical Care During COVID-19 During COVID-19 pandemic, potential for ICUs to become overwhelmed despite surge strategies in place[1] May be necessary to develop triage policy to prioritize patients (eg, by age for ICU admission) and ration resources[1] Key unknowns[1] ‒ Effect of long-term hospitalization or ICU stay on older populations ‒ Age limit for full recovery or benefit from hospitalization In single French LTCF, at least 24 COVID-19–related deaths over 5 days[2] ‒ Most attributed to hypovolemic shock, no ARDS observed; providers lacked protective masks, were overworked due to 40% staff absenteeism rate leading to patient neglect 1. Gavazzi. ECCVID 2020. 2. Diamantis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21:989. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Excess Winter Death in France: Younger Populations 600 15-44 Yrs of Age Excess Deaths (n) 400 Cumulative 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 200 0 -200 Younger Than 15 Yrs of Age 40 44 48 52 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 38 300 Wk Excess Deaths (n) 200 45-64 Yrs of Age 3,300 Cumulative 100 Excess Deaths (n) 2,800 0 Cumulative 2,300 -100 1,800 -200 1,300 -300 800 40 43 46 49 52 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 300 Wk -200 40 43 46 49 52 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 Wk Gavazzi. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Excess Winter Death in France: Older Populations 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 Cumulative Excess Deaths (n) Cumulative Excess Deaths (n) 15,000 65-84 Yrs of Age 20,000 ≥ 85 Yrs of Age 15,000 10,000 10,000 5000 5000 0 0 -5000 -5000 2 4 6 8 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 2 4 6 8 52 40 42 44 46 48 50 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 Wk Wk Gavazzi. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Meta-analysis Regarding Effect of Age on Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 Prioritize older populations for infection control and prevention; adapt the healthcare system as needed OR (95% CI) Mortality by Country Patients, n 70-79 Yrs vs 60-69 Yrs > 80 Yrs vs 70-79 Yrs China 44,672 2.32 (1.97-2.72) 2.00 (1.66-2.42) USA 2634 2.53 (1.87-3.44) 2.45 (1.87-3.22) UK 129,799 2.17 (2.06-2.28) 1.30 (1.26-1.35) Spain 220,375 3.24 (3.05-3.44) 1.66 (1.60-1.73) Italy 214,103 2.91 (2.78-3.05) 1.22 (1.19-1.26) Overall 611,583 2.62 (2.18-3.15) 1.60 (1.36-1.88) Bonanad. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21:915. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Factoring Ethics, Reason Into Decisions on Rationing Severity, Acute Disease Physiologic Reserves, Geriatric Criteria Benefit Autonomy Risks for death Hospitalization Nonmaleficence Risks for other ICU Beneficence outcomes Nursing home Equity Other Justice Personalized Medicine Gavazzi. ECCVID 2020. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Emerging ICU Guidance in Paris 1. ANTICIPATE the use of critical care for COVID+ patients on oxygen In the nursing home and long stay care units, emergency units, standard hospital care units – before clinical severity + traceability 2. COLLECT ADAPT the elements for decision-making Local organizations CLINICAL SINGULARITY PATIENT’S SINGULARITY Sanitary situation PATIENT’S WILL Respiratory Frailty + CFS Expressed COORDINATE Hemodynamics Comorbidities Advance directives Care pathways Neurology Age Trusted/close person Expertise (multiple) SOFA Score Neurocognitive INFORM-SUPPORT-COMMUNICATE 3. DECIDE Patients under the responsibility of a physician after a collegial process Relatives and friends ADMISSION NOT REQUIRED Caregivers IMMEDIATE ADMISSION ADMISSION DENIED Hospitalization (wards) The lay public Unrestricted/restricted Hospitalization (wards) Monitoring Re-evaluation Supportive/palliative care Reassessment Azoulay. Crit Care. 2020;24:293. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Social Determinants of Health in COVID-19
COVID-19 in São Paulo Slums Slums defined by: high population density, low per capita income, absence of basic urban infrastructure (garbage collection, basic sanitation) In Brazil, > 11 million people live in slums Higher social vulnerability co-maps with more COVID-19 deaths in São Paulo slums ‒ Underscores need to direct more effective public policies for disease mitigation toward vulnerable groups Oliveira. ECCVID 2020. Abstr. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Go Online for More CCO Coverage of COVID-19! Weekly Medical Minute presentations on timely topics related to care of patients with COVID-19 Question and answer Webinars hosted by expert faculty who will answer your questions in real time clinicaloptions.com/c19
You can also read