Changes of Mental State and Serum Prolactin Levels in Patients with Schizophrenia and Depression after Receiving the Combination Therapy of ...

Page created by Curtis Hayes
 
CONTINUE READING
Hindawi
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Volume 2022, Article ID 6580030, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6580030

Research Article
Changes of Mental State and Serum Prolactin Levels in
Patients with Schizophrenia and Depression after Receiving the
Combination Therapy of Amisulpride and
Chloroprothixol Tablets

          Bozhi Yuan and Mei Yuan
          Department of Psychiatry, Hanyang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430051, China

          Correspondence should be addressed to Mei Yuan; 2009030204@st.btbu.edu.cn

          Received 27 October 2021; Revised 20 December 2021; Accepted 29 January 2022; Published 22 February 2022

          Academic Editor: Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf

          Copyright © 2022 Bozhi Yuan and Mei Yuan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
          License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
          properly cited.

          Objective. To investigate the changes in mental state and serum prolactin levels in patients with schizophrenia and depression after
          receiving the combination therapy of amisulpride and chloroprothixol tablets. Methods. A total of 148 schizophrenic patients with
          depression were randomly divided into control group (N = 73) and study group (N = 75). The control group was treated with
          clopidothiol, and the study group was treated with amisulpride. Symptom scores, sleep quality, adverse reactions, therapeutic
          effects, prolactin, and progesterone levels, HAMD, PANSS, and PSP scores were compared between the two groups. Results.
          The symptom scores of both groups were significantly reduced, but when compared to the control group, the symptom scores
          of the research group were significantly reduced more significantly (P < 0:05); serum GDNF levels of both groups were
          significantly increased, while serum NSE, IL-1, and MBP levels were significantly reduced (P < 0:05). However, the research
          group altered more substantially (P < 0:05) than the control group; the overall PSQI score of the research group was lower
          (P < 0:05) than the control group; and the incidence of adverse responses in the control and study groups was 12.3 percent
          and 4.0 percent. The research group had a lower rate of adverse responses (P < 0:05) than the control group, and the effective
          treatment of the control and research groups was 82.2 percent and 98.7%, respectively. The research group had a lower rate of
          adverse reactions (P < 0:05) than the control group, while the control and research groups’ successful treatment rates were 82.2
          percent and 98.7%, respectively. When compared to the control group, the research group had a greater treatment efficiency
          (P < 0:05); blood prolactin and progesterone levels were considerably lowered in both groups, but the reductions in the
          research group were more evident (P < 0:05). Both groups had considerably lower HAMD and PANSS scores, and both had
          significantly higher PSP scores, although the difference in the research group was more evident (P < 0:05). Conclusion. For
          people with schizophrenia and depression, a combination of amisulpride and chloroprothixol pills has a considerable effect. It
          can help patients with their clinical symptoms and sleep quality while also lowering their serum prolactin levels, which is
          favorable to their illness recovery. As a result, the combined treatment of amisulpride and chloroprothixol pills deserves to be
          promoted and used.

1. Preface                                                               Drugs are often used in clinical adjuvant treatment, how-
                                                                         ever, patients frequently have serious pharmaceutical
People’s lives are now more stressful than they have ever                adverse effects. In therapeutic settings, chloprothixol tablets
been, and the frequency of schizophrenic groups is increas-              are used to treat people with schizophrenia and depression.
ing year after year. Some patients may have depressive                   However, prolactin secretion will be altered to some degree
symptoms, which will disrupt their normal sleep patterns                 following pharmaceutical treatment, and patient compliance
and have a greater effect on their overall quality of life [1].           will be limited [2]. Due to sensitivity to adverse responses,
2                                                                       Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

some patients may stop taking the treatment or lower their          of 3000 revolutions per minute, and detected by an auto-
dosage, resulting in recurrent illnesses that are difficult to        matic microplate reader.
manage [3]. Amisulpride therapy is based on the use of                   The levels of myelin basic protein (MBP), glial-derived
Chloprothixol pills, which have a good therapeutic effect            neurotrophic factor (GDNF), neuron-specific enolase
and are quite safe. It is an atypical antipsychotic medication      (NSE), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), relevant operations are
that is a benzamide derivative [4].                                 carried out in accordance with the instructions. Shanghai
    A total of 148 individuals with schizophrenia and               Xuya Biotechnology Co., Ltd. provides the kits.
depression were chosen for this trial, and they were given               The adverse reactions: count the number of cases of con-
amisulpride and chloroprothixol pills. The research looked          stipation/dry mouth, abnormal liver function, and extrapy-
at changes in patients’ mental states and serum prolactin           ramidal reactions, and calculate the incidence.
levels in the hopes of improving the patients’ mental health             The following is the therapeutic impact [8]: ineffective:
and prognosis, as well as the treatment’s safety.                   after therapy, clinical symptoms do not improve or deterio-
                                                                    rate significantly. Effective: after therapy, the number of
2. Materials and Methods                                            patients with positive symptoms drops considerably, and
                                                                    clinical symptoms improve. Significantly effective: clinical
2.1. The General Materials. The control group (n = 73), 35          problems largely subside after therapy, and mental state
males and 38 females, with an average course of disease             noticeably improves. The effective rate is derived by multi-
(5.60.6) years, age 18-60 years old, average age (32.42.6)          plying the total number of cases by 100 percent and adding
years old; the research group (n = 75), 36 males and 39             the number of strikingly effective and effective instances.
females, average course of disease (5.50.6) years, age 18-60        Prolactin and progesterone concentrations [9]: an electro-
years old, average age (32.62.4) years old; the research group      chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer is used to test
(n = 75), 36 males and 39 females, average course of disease        prolactin and progesterone levels. The stronger the thera-
(5.50.6) years, age 18-60 criteria for inclusion [5]: (1) did not   peutic impact, the more the numbers tend to be normal.
take part in any other clinical trials during the research; (2)          The HAMD, PANSS, and PSP scores [10]: the depression
age ≥ 18 years old; (3) obvious clinical symptoms, diagnosed        status of patients was evaluated by the Hamilton Depression
as schizophrenia with depression after diagnosis; (4) cooper-       Scale (HAMD), and the corresponding scores for severe, mod-
ate with the study and be able to receive prognostic follow-        erate, mild depression, and normal were >35 points, 20-35
up; (5) first onset. Exclusion criteria: (1) intolerance to the      points, 8-20 points, and  0:05), and the hospital ethics committee agreed.       depressive symptoms are. The PSP scale is used to evaluate a
                                                                    personal social function, including self-care, social relations,
2.2. Method. Amisulpride is a drug that is used to treat a          work, and study. The higher the score is, the more obvious
variety (National Medicine Standard H20113231, manufac-             the improvement of social function is.
turer: Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) treatment: 1000 mg/
time, 1 time per day; the first week’s treatment is continued        2.4. The Statistical Methods. After that, the data was put
at a daily dose of 300 mg. This dose should be continued if         through a normal distribution test. The composition ratio
the patient has no visible adverse events; the patient had a        should characterize the count data if the data has a normal
total of 12 rounds of continuous treatment. Chloprothixol           distribution, and the differences between groups were
tablets (National Medicine Standard H31021424, manufac-             explored using the chi-square test [11–13]. The measure-
turer: Shanghai Xinyi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) treatment:          ment data should be expressed as (mean standard devia-
1 time/day, 5 mg/time, gradually increase the dosage after          tion), the t test should be used to examine the differences
14 days of treatment, 15-20 mg per day, the patient received        between groups, and the physical influencing factors of the
a total of 12 courses of continuous treatment.                      case group should be investigated using Logistic regression
                                                                    P0:05 is considered statistically significant. GraphPad Prism
2.3. The Observation Index. The symptom score: record the           8 was used in this study to create graphs.
negative symptoms score, positive symptoms score, and total
score, the lower the score is, the more obvious the improve-        3. Result
ment of symptoms is.
    The sleep quality [6]: the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index       3.1. The Comparison of Symptom Scores between the Two
(PSQI) scale is used to assess the patients’ sleep quality. The     Groups before and after Treatment. Before treatment, there
scale includes a total score of 21 points and seven compo-          was no significant difference in the negative, positive, and
nents, each of which has a value of 0-3. The lower the score,       total symptom scores between the two groups (P > 0:05).
the more noticeable the sleep quality improvement is.               After treatment, the symptom scores of the two groups were
    The levels of serum GDNF, NSE, IL-1β, and MBP [7]:              significantly reduced, but compared with the control group,
3 ml fasting venous blood is drawn, centrifuged at a speed          the symptom scores of the research group were reduced
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine                                                                                                                      3

               Table 1: The comparison of the symptom scores between the two groups before and after treatment (x ± s).

                                               The negative symptom score                The positive symptom score                           Total score
                         Number of
Group                                             Before           After                    Before           After                       Before           After
                           cases
                                                treatment       treatment                 treatment       treatment                    treatment       treatment
The control group              73               27:6 ± 1:9         20:5 ± 1:5             14:2 ± 2:6             8:6 ± 1:5             80:7 ± 3:8         66:5 ± 3:2
The research
                               75               27:5 ± 2:0         18:2 ± 1:3             13:8 ± 2:4             7:8 ± 1:8             80:6 ± 3:7         50:8 ± 2:7
group
T                              /                   1.526             15.724                   0.963               13.728                  0.514            18.725
P                              /                   >0.05             0.05               0.05              0.05            0.05             0.05           0.05
4                                                                                                                                              Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

                             Incidence of adverse reactions (%)    15                                                                       group and the research group were 12.3% and 4.0%, respec-
                                                                                                                                            tively. Compared with the control group, the adverse reac-
                                                                                                                                            tion rate of the research group was lower. The difference
                                                                                                                                            between the two groups was statistically significant
                                                                   10
                                                                                                                                            (P < 0:05) (Figure 1).
                                                                                                                                   #        3.9. The Comparison of the Treatment Effect between the Two
                                                                    5                                                                       Groups. The treatment effect of the control group and the
                                                                                               #                                            research group was 82.2% and 98.7%, respectively. Com-
                                                                          #
                                                                                                                                            pared with the control group, the research group had a
                                                                                                             #
                                                                                                                                            higher treatment efficiency. There was a statistically signifi-
                                                                    0                                                                       cant difference between the two groups (P < 0:05) (Figure 2).
                                                                                                                   se
                                                                                n

                                                                                                   h

                                                                                                                                       te
                                                                              io

                                                                                                                 on
                                                                                                  t

                                                                                                                                   ra
                                                                                               ou
                                                                           ct

                                                                                                                                            3.10. The Comparison of the Levels of Prolactin and
                                                                                                              sp

                                                                                                                                 n
                                                                         un

                                                                                              m

                                                                                                                              tio
                                                                                                            re
                                                                         f

                                                                                         ry

                                                                                                                               c
                                                                      er

                                                                                                             l

                                                                                                                                            Progesterone in the Two Groups. Before treatment, there
                                                                                                          ea
                                                                                          d

                                                                                                                            ea
                                                                   liv

                                                                                       n/

                                                                                                       or

                                                                                                                        er
                                                                                    tio
                                                                   al

                                                                                                     rp

                                                                                                                                            was no significant difference in the levels of prolactin and pro-
                                                                                                                       rs
                                                                  m

                                                                                  pa

                                                                                                   co

                                                                                                                     ve
                                r

                                                                                                                                            gesterone between the two groups (P > 0:05). The levels of
                                                                                ti

                                                                                                tra
                              no

                                                                                                                 Ad
                                                                             ns
                            Ab

                                                                                              ex
                                                                           Co

                                                                                           t

                                                                                                                                            blood prolactin and progesterone in both groups were consid-
                                                                                        os
                                                                                       M

                                                                                                                                            erably lowered after treatment, but the changes in the research
                                                                              Control group                                                 group were more significant than the changes in the control
                                                                              Research group                                                group, and the difference between the two groups was statisti-
                                                                                                                                            cally significant (P > 0:05) (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)).
Figure 1: The comparison of the adverse reaction rates between the
two groups.                                                                                                                                 3.11. The Comparison of the HAMD, PANSS, and PSP Scores
                                                                                                                                            of the Two Groups. Before treatment, the HAMD, PANSS,
                            100                                                                                                             and PSP scores of the two groups were not significantly
                                                                                                                                            different (P > 0:05). Both groups’ HAMD and PANSS
                                                                                                                                        #
                            80
                                                                                                                                            scores were considerably reduced after treatment, while
                                                                                                                                            their PSP scores were significantly increased, although
Therapeutic response rate

                                                                                                                 #                          the changes in the research group were more noticeable,
                            60                                                                                                              and the difference between the two groups was statistically
                                                                                                                                            significant (P < 0:05) (Figure 4).
                            40
                                                                                                                                            4. Discussion

                            20
                                                                                                                                            Schizophrenia is caused by a variety of reasons, the most
                                                                                                                                            common of which is a loss of serotonin system function. It
                                                                    #                                                                       is also linked to psychotic symptoms and secondary causes.
                                         0                                                                                                  Other psychosocial variables and antipsychotic medications
                                                                        Invalid           Efficient Markedly effective Efficient            are also linked to it [14–16]. Schizophrenia patients may
                                                                                                                                            exhibit both negative and positive symptoms [17]. Hypovo-
                                                                    Control group
                                                                                                                                            lemia, social withdrawal, poor thinking, sluggish movement,
                                                                    Research group
                                                                                                                                            lethargy, and other negative symptoms are the most com-
Figure 2: The comparison of the treatment effect between the two                                                                             mon, whereas thinking disorder, abnormal hyperactivity,
groups.                                                                                                                                     hallucinations, uncoordinated actions, delusions, and other
                                                                                                                                            positive symptoms are the most common [18]. There are a
                                                                                                                                            lot of research on clinical symptoms in the clinical applica-
significantly reduced, but compared with the control group,                                                                                  tion of amisulpride, however, there aren’t enough studies
the changes in the research group were more obvious, and                                                                                    on sleep and mental state improvement. This research exam-
the difference between the two groups was statistically signif-                                                                              ines the safety of the amisulpride therapy by selecting certi-
icant (P < 0:05) (Table 2).                                                                                                                 fied samples [19–21]. The findings showed that amisulpride
                                                                                                                                            medication for schizophrenia and depression patients has a
3.7. The Comparison of Sleep Quality Scores between the Two                                                                                 substantial impact and may help with sleep problems.
Groups. Compared with the control group, the total PSQI                                                                                     Because of its evident pharmacological properties, it may
score of the research group was lower, and the difference                                                                                    help patients’ mental states improve even more, and their
between the two groups was statistically significant                                                                                         negative feelings can be greatly reduced [22, 23].
(P < 0:05) (Table 3).                                                                                                                            Amisulpride has an antagonistic impact on the
                                                                                                                                            midbrain-limbic system’s postsynaptic membrane dopamine
3.8. The Comparison of the Adverse Reaction Rates between                                                                                   receptors. The primary considerations are the pharmacolog-
the Two Groups. The adverse reaction rates of the control                                                                                   ical properties. The release and synthesis of dopamine are
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine                                                                                                                     5

                               50                                                                           80

                               40
                                                                                                            60

                                                                                   Progesterone(ng/mL)
             Prolactin (g/L)

                               30
                                                                                                            40
                               20

                                                                                                            20
                               10

                                0                                                                            0

                                     Control group (before treatment)                                             Control group (before treatment)
                                                                                                                  Control group (after treatment)
                                     Control group (after treatment)
                                                                                                                  Research group (before treatment)
                                     Research group (before treatment)
                                                                                                                  Research group(after treatment)
                                     Research group(after treatment)
                                                     (a)                                                                          (b)

                                                 Figure 3: The comparison of the levels of prolactin and progesterone.

            1000                                                                                         assist with depression and anxiety [22]. The research looked
                                                                                                         at the impact of combining two medications on patients’
                                                                                                         mental health and clinical symptoms. The study’s findings
             800
                                                                                                         revealed that both groups’ symptom scores were significantly
                                                                                                         reduced, but the research group’s symptom scores decreased
             600                                                                                         more significantly (P < 0:05) when compared to the control
    Score

                                                                                                         group; both groups’ HAMD and PANSS scores were signif-
                                                                                                         icantly reduced, and both groups’ PSP scores were signifi-
             400
                                                                                                         cantly increased, but the changes in the research group
                                                                                                         were more significant (P < 0:05). The findings revealed that,
             200                                                                                         when compared to single-drug treatment, two-drug combi-
                                                                                                         nation therapy may significantly improve clinical symptoms
                                                                                                         while also alleviating depression in patients. Patients’ ability
                      0
                                                                                                         to communicate emotions and sleep quality may both be
                                HAMD scores     PANSSscores        PSPscores
                                                                                                         enhanced. Patients with schizophrenia and depression have
                                Control group (after treatment)                                          apparent nervous system impairment, and their serum
                                Study group (after treatment)                                            MBP and NSE levels will be much higher. Clinical monitor-
                                                                                                         ing of GDNF levels may be used to assess a patient’s cogni-
Figure 4: The comparison of the HAMD, PANSS, and PSP scores                                              tive function. Furthermore, some researchers asserted that
of the two groups.                                                                                       there is a link between blood IL-1 levels and patient cogni-
                                                                                                         tive performance, and that serum IL-1 levels may be used
                                                                                                         to assess central nervous system degeneration and injury
greatly enhanced, and the transmission speed of dopamine is                                              [23]. The study’s findings revealed that both groups’ serum
accelerated. Increasing the quantity of amisulpride prevents                                             GDNF levels were considerably higher, while their serum
the binding between postsynaptic membrane receptors and                                                  NSE, IL-1, and MBP levels were significantly lower, although
dopamine and subsequently antagonizes dopamine autore-                                                   the research group altered more significantly (P < 0:05) than
ceptors. The impact of amisulpride on 5-HT7a is now caus-                                                the control group. The results confirmed that the combined
ing a lot of clinical worry. Some researchers think it is linked                                         treatment of amisulpride and chloroprothixol tablets is ben-
to the antidepressant effect. Patients with positive and nega-                                            eficial to the improvement of the central nervous system
tive symptoms are visible, and some patients will have signif-                                           function of patients, and at the same time reduces the level
icant cognitive impairment, act oddly, and be prone to                                                   of serum inflammatory factors, which can speed up the
crankiness. A combination of amisulpride and chloro-                                                     recovery of patients. The combined therapy of amisulpride
prothixol tablets therapy, according to some experts, has a                                              and chloroprothixol tablets is safer and can improve
greater impact.                                                                                          patients’ clinical symptoms. However, clinical attention
    The brain’s postsynaptic dopamine receptors are blocked                                              should be paid to the effect of the above two drugs on the
by chlorprothixol tablets. It is an antipsychotic that may                                               serum prolactin level of patients. Under the action of
6                                                                          Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

prolactin release inhibitors and prolactin release factors, the         [6] S. G. Kang, S. E. Cho, K. S. Na, C. U. Pae, and S. J. Cho, “Clin-
amount of prolactin secreted increased significantly [24].                   ical usefulness of amisulpride add-on therapy in schizophrenia
Amisulpride blocks presynaptic autoreceptors, resulting in                  patients without treatment response to second- generation
a considerable improvement in patients’ unpleasant feelings.                antipsychotics,” Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neurosci-
According to the findings, the incidence of adverse                          ence, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 117–124, 2021.
responses in the control and research groups was 12.3 per-              [7] T. Hadryś and J. Rymaszewska, “Amisulpride - is it as all other
cent and 4.0 percent, respectively, and the successful treat-               medicines or is it different? An update,” Psychiatria Polska,
ment rate was 82.2 percent and 98.7%, respectively. In                      vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 977–989, 2020.
comparison to the control group, the research group had a               [8] R. Pandit, D. Cianci, S. E. Ter Hark et al., “Phenotypic factors
higher treatment efficiency and a lower incidence of adverse                  associated with amisulpride-induced weight gain in first-
                                                                            episode psychosis patients (from the OPTiMiSE cohort),” Acta
reactions (P < 0:05); both groups had substantial decreases
                                                                            Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 283–290, 2019.
in blood prolactin and progesterone, albeit the reductions
in the research group were more significant (P0:05) when                 [9] S. C. Hopkins, S. Wilkinson, T. J. Corriveau et al., “Discovery
                                                                            of nonracemic amisulpride to maximize benefit/risk of 5-
compared to the control group. When compared to single-
                                                                            HT7 and D2 receptor antagonism for the treatment of mood
drug therapy, the data showed that combining the two med-                   disorders,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 110,
icines may enhance blood prolactin and progesterone levels                  no. 3, pp. 808–815, 2021.
to a greater degree while also improving patient prognosis
                                                                       [10] D. Fraguas, C. M. Díaz-Caneja, L. Pina-Camacho et al., “The
and treatment compliance. To conclude, the combined ther-                   role of depression in the prediction of a "late" remission in
apy of amisulpride and chloroprothixol tablets for schizo-                  first- episode psychosis: an analysis of the OPTiMiSE study,”
phrenia and depression improves clinical symptoms and                       Schizophrenia Research, vol. 231, pp. 100–107, 2021.
sleep quality while reducing serum prolactin levels, which             [11] R. Colle, F. Boichot, E. Bouteiller et al., “Restless legs syndrome
is beneficial to recovery. As a result, the combination therapy              and schizophrenia: a case report,” Journal of Clinical Psycho-
of amisulpride and chloroprothixol pills deserves to be pro-                pharmacology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 91-92, 2018.
moted and used.                                                        [12] W. Yu, J. Huang, S. He, L. Zhang, Y. Shen, and H. Li, “Safety
                                                                            and related factors of treatment with long-term atypical antipsy-
                                                                            chotic in Chinese patients with schizophrenia: observational
Data Availability                                                           study,” General Psychiatry, vol. 34, no. 1, p. e100289, 2021.
The data used to support the findings of this study are                 [13] J. Chen, N. Meng, B. Cao, Y. Ye, Y. Ou, and Z. Li, “Transitory
included within the article.                                                restless arms syndrome in a patient with antipsychotics and
                                                                            antidepressants: a case report,” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 21,
                                                                            no. 1, p. 453, 2021.
Conflicts of Interest                                                  [14] J. X. Zhang and X. Li, “Changes in serum thyroid hormone
                                                                            levels in psychiatric patients treated with second-generation
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.                 antipsychotics,” Endokrynologia Polska, vol. 71, no. 4,
                                                                            pp. 292–298, 2020.
                                                                       [15] Y. Zhang, Z. Tang, Y. Ruan et al., “Prolactin and thyroid stim-
References                                                                  ulating hormone (TSH) levels and sexual dysfunction in
                                                                            patients with schizophrenia treated with conventional antipsy-
 [1] M. Huhn, A. Nikolakopoulou, J. Schneider-Thoma et al.,
                                                                            chotic medication: a cross-sectional study,” Medical Science
     “Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics
                                                                            Monitor, vol. 24, pp. 9136–9143, 2018.
     for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizo-
     phrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis,” Lan-     [16] M. G. Petruzzelli, L. Marzulli, O. V. Giannico et al., “Glucose
     cet, vol. 394, no. 10202, pp. 939–951, 2019.                           metabolism, thyroid function, and prolactin level in adolescent
 [2] M. Krause, Y. Zhu, M. Huhn et al., “Antipsychotic drugs for            patients with first episode of schizophrenia and affective disor-
     patients with schizophrenia and predominant or prominent               ders,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 11, 2020.
     negative symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis,”        [17] C. Li, Z. Shi, J. Ji, G. Niu, and Z. Liu, “Associations of C-
     European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience,             reactive protein, free triiodothyronine, thyroid stimulating
     vol. 268, no. 7, pp. 625–639, 2018.                                    hormone and creatinine levels with agitation in patients with
 [3] G. Wang, B. Zhou, L. Zheng, Y. Ni, and A. Pan, “Prediction of          schizophrenia: a comparative cross-sectional study,” Neuro-
     the significance in the improvement of depression symptoms              psychiatric Disease and Treatment, vol. Volume 17,
     of amisulpride in the treatment of schizophrenia: an 8-week            pp. 2575–2585, 2021.
     case-control study,” Annals Palliative Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5,   [18] Y. Zhu, H. Ji, L. Tao et al., “Functional status of hypothalamic-
     pp. 3481–3487, 2020.                                                   pituitary-thyroid and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axes in
 [4] G. van Rooijen, J. M. Vermeulen, H. G. Ruhé, and L. de Haan,           hospitalized schizophrenics in Shanghai,” Frontiers in Psychia-
     “Treating depressive episodes or symptoms in patients with             try, vol. 11, 2020.
     schizophrenia,” CNS Spectrums, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 239–248,       [19] V. Wasnik, C. R. J. Khess, S. Munda, and S. Bijali, “Serum pro-
     2019.                                                                  lactin level and its correlation with psychopathology in drug
 [5] R. C. Smith, S. Leucht, and J. M. Davis, “Maximizing response          free/drug naive schizophrenia a case control study,” Asian
     to first-line antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a review focused         Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 39, pp. 1–5, 2019.
     on finding from meta-analysis,” Psychopharmacology (Berl),         [20] J. P. Stohn, M. E. Martinez, M. Zafer, D. López-Espíndola,
     vol. 236, no. 2, pp. 545–559, 2019.                                    L. M. Keyes, and A. Hernandez, “Increased aggression and lack
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine                       7

       of maternal behavior in Dio3-deficient mice are associated
       with abnormalities in oxytocin and vasopressin systems,”
       Genes Brain Behav, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2018.
[21]   D. Endres, R. Dersch, B. Hochstuhl et al., “Intrathecal thyroid
       autoantibody synthesis in a subgroup of patients with schizo-
       phreniform syndromes,” The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and
       Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 365–374, 2017.
[22]   L. Stephen, E. Schwarz, and P. C. Guest, “Multiplex immuno-
       assay profiling of serum in psychiatric disorders,” Advances in
       Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 974, pp. 149–156,
       2017.
[23]   F. Zhang, P. Kanzali, V. Rubin, C. Paras, and J. Goldman,
       “Neuroleptic malignant syndrome with thyroid disorder: an
       unusual case report,” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 96, no. 39,
       p. e8191, 2017.
[24]   R. Xie, Y. Chen, K. Chen, and Z. Chen, “Intervention effect of
       rapid rehabilitation nursing combined with continuous nurs-
       ing after discharge on patients with cerebral infarction in
       recovery period and the changes in motor function, mental
       state, and quality of life,” Evidence-Based Complementary
       and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2021, 8 pages, 2021.
You can also read