Canadian Banks Mid-Year Outlook 2020: Navigating Through The Pandemic Cautiously - Aug. 14, 2020 - S&P Global
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Lidia Parfeniuk Canadian Banks Mid-Year Outlook 2020: Shameer Bandeally Amit Tiwari Navigating Through The Pandemic Cautiously Devi Aurora Felix Winnekens Aug. 14, 2020
Canadian Banks Mid-Year Outlook 2020 | Contents Outlook 3 Macroeconomic View 4 Capital & Earnings 6 Asset Quality 8 Consumer Lending 10 Commercial Lending 12 Funding & Liquidity 14 TLAC & ALAC 15 Related Research 16 Data as of Q220 for all DSIBs, as of Q120 for Desjardins Group 2
Fundamental Forecast | Strong Balance Sheets Worsening Neutral Improving We expect revenues to decline by 5% year on year in 2020 reflecting pressure on net interest income from ultra low interest rates, and headwinds for some fee income sources. Some offset could result if capital Revenues markets hold up in the remainder of the year or if there is partial offset from stronger overall corporate and commercial lending. We expect 2020 expenses to remain relatively stable as certain variable costs have reduced however DSIBs Expenses are absorbing costs associated with COVID-19. Consequently, we expect negative operating leverage for 2020. We expect material declines in profitability as net income declines by 30%-50% in 2020 reflecting significantly higher provisions for loan losses. As the economy recovers in 2021, profitability could reverse Profitability its decline, albeit to levels lower than in 2019. We see asset quality metrics deteriorating as higher loan losses emerge particularly from the banks’ exposures to high-risk sectors related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including hospitality, restaurants, oil and gas, and certain segments of commercial real estate (CRE) such as retail, and unsecured consumer Asset quality lending with much of the deterioration occurring in 2021. However, the banks’ exposures to these sectors in our view, are manageable. We expect capital ratios to decline from current levels as earnings decline, and higher risk-weighted averages (RWAs) in part reflecting draws on corporate lines and elevated market risk. Still, we expect the Capital DSIBs ‘ risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratios to remain within our adequate range of 7%-10% in our base case and in our stylized adverse stress scenario. We expect funding trends to remain more or less stable and market access for DSIBs’ issuances to Funding & liquidity continue, and for them to maintain appropriate levels of liquidity in the downturn. The various funding programs put in place by central bank helped support funding markets without any major disruptions. 3
Canada’s Economy Faces A Patchy Recovery – S&P Global Economics forecasts real GDP will contract 5.9% in 2020 before rising 5.4% in 2021, resulting in a peak-to- trough contraction of more than 13%. – We expect an economic recovery in two stages: a near term bounce in aggregate demand and employment activity, followed by a more gradual protracted, and uneven improvement in the economy. – We forecast a near-term correction in house prices down 8.7% year over year, in first-quarter 2021, before starting to recover by the end of 2021 as the labor market finds its footing and the pandemic uncertainty fades – We expect the economy to still be 2.5% smaller in 2023 compared with the pre-pandemic anticipated size. Macroeconomic Outlook – Significant Fiscal Response To COVID-19 Select Economic Indicators Pandemic By Canada 2017 2018 2019 2020f 2021f Tax deferrals, loans and other credit measures Direct Spending Real GDP (%) 3.2 2.0 1.7 (5.9) 5.4 18 16 CPI (%) 1.6 2.2 2.0 (0.4) 1.2 14 (% of GDP) 12 HPI (% YoY) 8.9 2.1 2.4 (4.9) 3.3 10 8 Unemployment (%) 6.3 5.8 5.7 9.2 7.3 6 4 3 Month T-Bill (%) 0.68 1.36 1.66 0.51 0.23 2 0 10 Year Bond (%) 1.78 2.28 1.59 0.60 1.09 Total Federal Provincial* Source: S&P Global Ratings, Statistics Canada, Bank of Canada, Oxford Economics, *provincial figures estimated from provincial finance departments 4
Stable Trends On BICRA Economic and Industry Risk Scores – While downside risks associated with high consumer indebtedness and elevated house prices will remain key areas of surveillance, we expect the impact on house price correction to be manageable and short lived. BICRA group ‘2’ – Economic Risk trend: 3/Stable – Industry Risk trend: 2/Stable Key strengths – High-income, well-diversified, competitive, and resilient economy – Strong industry stability, unified regulatory framework, and deep capital markets Key Weaknesses – High household debt and real estate prices. We expect a sharp decline in home prices but short lived. A BICRA (Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment) is scored on a scale from ‘1’ to ’10’, ranging from the lowest-risk banking systems (group ‘1’) to the highest-risk (group ‘10’). ER – Economic Risk; IR – Industry Risk. Source: S&P Global Ratings. BICRAs as of July 2020. 5
Capital Ratios Will Decline Slightly While Remaining Appropriate For The Ratings DSIB Capital Metrics Q220 RAC 2020F RAC Q220 CET1 – Our base-case scenario assumes losses on average of 3x the 2019 losses. Adverse CET1 Severely Adverse CET1 12% – Our sensitivity analysis indicates that DSIBs' capital and liquidity levels have enough strength to endure adverse 10% downside scenarios, characterized by credit losses of up to 1.8% (5x the 8% average 2019 loss rate). – Under our adverse stress scenario, 6% DSIBs' RAC ratios would remain in the adequate range of 7% - 10%. 4% – We could take widespread rating actions if loss rates surpass this level, under our 2% severely adverse loss scenario (8x the average 2019 loss rate). 0% BMO BNS CM NA RY TD Sources: S&P Global Ratings and company filings. RAC – Risk-adjusted Capital. CET1 – Common Equity Tier 1 ratio. Adverse & Severely Adverse CET1 projected at Q420. BMO—Bank of Montreal. BNS—Bank of Nova Scotia. CM—Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. NA—National Bank of Canada. RY—Royal Bank of Canada. TD—Toronto-Dominion Bank. 6
Profitability To Remain Constrained By Sharply Higher Provisions – The big drop in earnings year to date is related to sharply higher provisions for loan losses. We don’t expect profitability to return to pre-pandemic levels before end of 2021. – We expect domestic NIMs to remain under pressure in the ultra low interest rate environment and for interest rates to remain near zero. We believe that NII will stabilize by 2021 reflecting growth in high-yielding corporate loans. – DSIBs’ productivity ratios are holding up; however, there are fewer opportunities to reduce costs meaningfully to offset the impact from lost revenues. Low Rates The New Norm DSIB Profit Metrics DSIB Domestic NIM (LHS) BoC Overnight Rate (RHS) Revenue Net Income Productivity 10 Year Bond Yield (RHS) Mortgage Rate (RHS) 14,000 80% 2.65% 3.50% 12,000 70% 3.00% 10,000 60% 2.60% $CAD Mil. 2.50% 50% 8,000 2.55% 2.00% 40% 6,000 2.50% 1.50% 30% 4,000 20% 1.00% 2.45% 2,000 0.50% 10% 2.40% 0.00% 0 0% Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q2 17 Q3 17 Q4 17 Q1 18 Q2 18 Q3 18 Q4 18 Q1 19 Q2 19 Q3 19 Q4 19 Q120 Q220 BMO BNS CM NA RY TD Sources: S&P Global Ratings and company filings. NIM – net interest margin. BoC –bank of Canada. NII – Net interest income. 7
Asset Quality To Weaken Though The Banks Have Sufficient Cushion For Much Higher Loan Losses DSIB Asset Quality Adj. NPAs (% Loans) NCOs (% Average Loans) – We believe credit losses will rise, albeit from low levels, and will peak in 2021 at LLRs / Adj. NPAs (%) (RHS) about 70 basis points (bps). 1.2% 140% – These rates exceed losses recorded during the global financial crisis (58bps) 120% and reflect exposure to high risk sectors 1.0% including oil and gas, CRE, as well in 100% unsecured consumer lending. 0.8% – We believe expected losses will be 80% manageable from an earnings and 0.6% 60% capital perspective. 0.4% – Losses will be deferred to 2021 as most 40% deferral programs won’t end for another 0.2% few months. 20% – The average allowance is 80 bps of loans; 0.0% 0% however, if we exclude low risk insured mortgages, the coverage improves to an 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Q220 2020F 2021F allowance of 90 bps. Sources: S&P Global Ratings and company filings. NPAs – Nonperforming assets. NCOs – Net chargeoffs. LLRs – loan loss reserves. RHS – Right-hand side. 8
High-Risk Sectors Will Generate Higher Losses, But Should Be Manageable Overall High-Risk Sector Exposure (% Total Loans) CRE HL&E Retail & Trade Transport Oil & Gas – DSIBs’ exposure to high risk sectors is on 12% average under 5%-10% of their 10% wholesale loan portfolios, including 8% 6% media, entertainment, leisure, tourism, 4% hospitality, retail, restaurants, oil and 2% gas, retail CRE, and transportation. 0% – We expect significantly higher loan BMO BNS CM NA RY TD losses from these sectors though we believe that DISBs are well-positioned to Deferred Loans (% Total Loans) absorb much higher loan losses. 18% 16% 14% – Deferrals – which have been 12% concentrated in residential mortgages, 10% 8% followed by commercial loans – have 6% slowed since early April. 4% 2% – We believe that there is a possibility of 0% BMO BNS CM NA RY TD further payment extensions as the banks Source: S&P Global Ratings, company filings. CRE – Commercial Real Estate. HL&E continue to work with their customers. –Hospitality, leisure, and entertainment. 9
Mortgages & HELOCs Loan Losses To Remain Low DSIB RESL Portfolio NPAs (% RESL Loans) LHS NCOs (% RESL Loans) RHS PCLs (% Total PCLs) RHS – We expect credit losses in DSIBs’ mortgage portfolios, which represent 40% of loans 0.7% 2.0% on average, to remain modest. – We expect credit losses from a potential 0.6% correction in home prices to be cushioned 1.5% by the substantial borrower equity within 0.5% the uninsured residential mortgage loans (conservative loan to values (LTVs) of high 40% to mid 50% range), strong credit 1.0% 0.4% underwriting (including stress testing), and sizable level of income- support from the government’s generous fiscal support. 0.3% 0.5% – We expect losses in the mortgage book to remain consistent with our view of a short- 0.2% lived correction phase in the housing markets. 0.0% 0.1% – We expect HELOCs to show slightly higher loan losses than conventional mortgages; however, they are mostly first lien and 0.0% -0.5% benefit from similar conservative LTVs. BMO BNS CM NA RY TD DG Sources: S&P Global Ratings and company filings. NPAs – nonperforming assets. NCOs – net chargeoffs. PCLs – provision for credit losses. DG PCLs not disclosed. . DG— Federation des caisses Desjardins du Quebec (Desjardins Group). 10
Unsecured Consumer Losses Could Rise Sharply Other Consumer Asset Quality DSIBs – Other Consumer Loan Growth OC NPAs (% OC Loans) OC NCOs (% OC Loans) Credit Cards HELOC Other Personal 2.5% 15% 2.0% 10% 5% 1.5% 0% 1.0% -5% 0.5% -10% -15% 0.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Q2 20 BMO BNS CM NA RY TD DG Source: S&P Global Ratings, company filings. NPAs – nonperforming assets. NCOs – net chargeoffs. OC – Other Consumer which includes cards and auto loans. – We expect losses in unsecured consumer lending portfolios, including cards and auto, to rise meaningfully because during times of stress consumers tend to wait to pay off their credit card bills and defer on auto loan payments. – Unsecured consumer loans represent on average 11% of DSIBs’ total loans, and the average compounded growth rate was 4% from 2012 to 2019. – Indirect consumer exposure to oil and gas producing provinces is manageable though we expect losses to be much higher. 11
Higher Risk Property Types Within CRE Could Suffer DSIB CRE Portfolio CRE Loans (% Total) LHS CRE NPAs (% CRE Loans) RHS CRE PCLs (% Total PCLs) RHS – The overall exposure to CRE and construction lending at about 9% of DSIBs’ loans (on average) is manageable. 12% 2.5% – Condo exposures are about 9%-10% of total CRE among DSIBs. 10% 2.0% – The CRE portfolios are also well- diversified by geography and property type and exposure to construction 8% lending is limited. 1.5% – Non-performing assets have averaged 6% less than 1% of CRE loans and provisions for credit losses (PCLs) are less than 2% 1.0% of DSIBs PCLs so far this year, with the 4% exception of BMO. – However, several CRE property types 0.5% (such as retail, hospitality, and office 2% space) will continue to remain at high risk from social distancing for a relatively long time and could suffer structurally. 0% 0.0% BMO BNS CM NA RY TD Sources: S&P Global Ratings and company filings. NPAs – nonperforming assets. NCOs – net chargeoffs. PCLs – provision for credit losses. 12
Despite Modest Exposures, Oil And Gas Contribute Heavily To Credit Migrations – DISIBs’ oil and gas exposures are the most immediately vulnerable from a credit standpoint. – The very sharp decline in oil prices has severely affected the sector. However, DSIBs’ exposure to oil and gas at 2.2% of total loans in our view is very modest. – As a result of the slew of oil and gas loan migrations in the banks’ portfolios, provisions for loan losses rose nearly 450% on average in second quarter from the first quarter. – Roughly 40% of the energy book is investment grade with the bulk of exposures in the exploration and production sector. The credit profiles of DSIBs’ oil and gas loan portfolios have improved since 2015-2016 when oil prices dropped sharply. Oil & Gas – Asset & Asset Quality Breakdown of O&G Exposures Other Midstream & Downstream (RMD) Net O&G Loans / Total Loans Net O&G NPAs / O&G Loans (%) Drilling & Services Exploration & Production 4.5% 120% 4.0% 3.5% 100% 3.0% 80% 2.5% 2.0% 60% 1.5% 40% 1.0% 0.5% 20% 0.0% 0% BMO BNS CM NA RY TD BMO BNS CM NA RY TD Source: S&P Global Ratings, company filings. O&G – Oil & Gas. NPAs – nonperforming assets. 13
Funding Is Stable And Liquidity Remains High – Funding for DSIBs has been stable, helped by the extensive measures put in place by the Bank of Canada to avoid any disruptions in the funding markets and continued international receptivity for the Canadian banks’ issuances. – DSIBs entered the downturn with solid balance sheets with about half of their deposits viewed as core customer deposits, and with conservative, highly rated, and liquid investment portfolios. – DSIBs deposits grew as some corporates recycled a good proportion of their draws as deposits. We expect deposit growth to remain relatively strong this year, but could decelerate next year. DSIBs – Funding Metrics DSIBs – Liquidity Metrics Loans / Deposits (LHS) S&P Stable Funding Ratio (RHS) Liquidity Coverage Ratio (RHS) BLA / ST (LHS) 130% 102% 1.30x 140% 100% 1.25x 135% 125% 98% 1.20x 130% 120% 96% 1.15x 1.10x 125% 94% 115% 1.05x 120% 92% 1.00x 115% 110% 90% 0.95x 88% 110% 105% 0.90x 86% 105% 0.85x 100% 84% 0.80x 100% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Q2 Q2 Source: S&P Global Ratings, company filings. BLA / ST – Broad liquid assets to short-term wholesale funding. 14
TLAC & ALAC – Banks Are Well Positioned On Both Ends TLAC Breakdown & Ratios CET1 Additional Tier 1 – At mid-year 2020, DSIBs’ average regulatory total loss Tier 2 Other TLAC absorbing capacity (TLAC) and TLAC leverage ratios TLAC Ratio (%) TLAC Leverage (%) stood at 21% and 6.4%, respectively. 120 26% 24% – We expect DSIBs to comfortably reach the minimum 100 22% requirements on TLAC of 22.50% (of risk weighted 20% 18% assets) and TLAC leverage of 6.75% by Nov. 1, 2021. 80 $CAD Bil. 16% 14% – We continue to view the Canadian government as 60 12% “supportive,” however, should our views change to 10% 40 8% support “uncertain,” we believe DSIBs will be well- 6% positioned to receive an ALAC notch equivalent to 20 4% 2% their notching for extraordinary government support, 0 0% which would be neutral from a ratings perspective. BMO BNS CM NA RY TD DG BMO BNS CM NA RY TD DG Anchor a- bbb+ a- a- a- a- a- SACP a a a- a- a+ a+ a Sys. Importance +1 +1 +2 +1 +1 +1 +1 Potential ALAC Uplift +1 +1 +2 +2 +1 +1 +1 ICR A+ A+ A+ A AA- AA- A+ Bail-In Debt2 A- A- BBB+ BBB+ A A A- Sources: S&P Global Ratings, company filings. TLAC – total loss absorbing capacity. ALAC – additional loss absorbing capacity. 15
Canadian Bank Mid-Year Outlook 2020 | Related Research – Canadian House Prices Are Likely To Decline Sharply Into Next Year; Strong Fundamentals Restrain Broader Housing Market Risks For Now, July 16, 2020 – Canada’s Economy Faces A Patchy Recovery, June 29, 2020 – Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment Update, June 26, 2020 – Laurentian Bank of Canada Affirmed At ‘BBB’; Outlook Remains Negative on Weak Earnings Capacity, June 10, 2020 – North American Financial Institutions Monitor 2Q 2020, May 15, 2020 – HSBC Holdings Ratings Lowered To ‘A-/A-2’ On Muted Earnings Prospects And Extensive Restructuring; Outlook Stable, May 13, 2020 – Canadian Banks Are Set To Face COVID-19 Related Headwinds From A Position of Strength, Apr. 16, 2020 – U.S. Banking Outlook, Jan. 13, 2020 – Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment: Canada, Jan. 2, 2020 – Global Banking Outlook, Nov. 19, 2019 16
Appendix: Ratings – Stable Ratings In Our Base Case Adjustments from the Anchor: Very Weak (-5) Weak (-2) Moderate (-1) Avg & Adeq (0) Strong (+1) Very Strong (+2) Business Capital & Risk Funding & Systemic Anchor SACP ICR & Outlook Position Earnings Position Liquidity (F&L) Importance Bank of Montreal a- Adequate Adequate Strong Avg. & Adeq. a High A+/Stable Bank of Nova Scotia bbb+ Strong Adequate Strong Avg. & Adeq. a High A+/Stable Canadian Imperial a- Adequate Adequate Adequate Avg. & Adeq. a- High A+/Stable Bank of Commerce Fédération des caisses Desjardins du a- Adequate Strong Adequate Avg. & Adeq. a Moderate A+/Stable Québec National Bank of a- Adequate Adequate Adequate Avg. & Adeq. a- Moderate A/Stable Canada Royal Bank of Canada a- Strong Adequate Strong Avg. & Adeq. a+ High AA-/Stable Toronto-Dominion a- Strong Adequate Strong Avg. & Adeq. a+ High AA-/Stable Bank Source: S&P Global Ratings. SACP--Stand-alone credit profile. ICR--Issuer credit rating. Avg & Adeq.--Average & Adequate. *Holding company rating. 17
Analytical Contacts Lidia Parfeniuk Shameer Bandeally Amit Tiwari Director Associate Director Ratings Analyst Toronto Toronto Toronto +1-416-507-2517 +1-416-507-3230 +1-416-507-3224 lidia.parfeniuk@spglobal.com shameer.bandeally@spglobal.com amit.tiwari@spglobal.com Devi Aurora Satyam Panday Felix Winnekens Analytical Manager Senior Economist Director New York New York New York +1-212-438-3055 +1-212-438-6009 +1-212-438-0313 devi.aurora@spglobal.com satyam.panday@spglobal.com felix.winnekens@spglobal.com 18
Copyright © 2020 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&PParties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. Australia: S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Ltd holds Australian financial services license number 337565 under the Corporations Act 2001. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings and related research are not intended for and must not be distributed to any person in Australia other than a wholesale client (as defined in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act). STANDARD & POOR'S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. spglobal.com/ratings 19
You can also read