BP management in TBI Mustapha Ezzeddine, MD - Neurocritical Care University of Minnesota Medical Center
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
BP management in TBI Mustapha Ezzeddine, MD Neurocritical Care University of Minnesota Medical Center
Hypertension is common in acute TBI • Patients presenting with isolated TBI often present acutely hypertensive. • A catecholamine surge occurs as stress response to the brain trauma, similarly to other types of acute brain injury • to a massive release of epinephrine and norepinephrine in the systemic circulation can occur without increased ICp
Hypotension is also common in early TBI • About a third of all TBI patients are hypotensive • Often related to systemic trauma, hypoxia and blood loss • Can be present in isolated brain injury in about a third of the cases • Isolated TBI/hypotension more common in pediatrics.? Related to neurogenic cardiac injury
Early Hypotension is linked to worse outcomes • Hypotension on presentation linked to 150% increase in mortality in one study • BP lower than 75% percentile linked to worse outcome even with SBP>90 • Patients with early hypotension did worse than patients with delayed hypotension.
Secondary Injury Hypotension = Devastation • Chesnut RM, Marshall SB, Piek J, Blunt BA, Klauber MR, Marshall LF. Early and late systemic hypotension as a frequent and fundamental source of cerebral ischemia following severe brain injury in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1993;59:121-5
Secondary Injury Hypotension • Severe head injury in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank – GCS score < or = 8 – Hypotension = SBP < 90 mm Hg • Early Hypotension: (248 of 717 patients) – Mortality: 55% vs 27% – If shock present, mortality was 65% • Late Hypotension: In ICU (156 of 493 patients) – Mortality or vegetative state: 66% vs 17% • Logistic Regression Modeling – Early and late shock were the most powerful independent predictors of mortality
Secondary Injury Hypotension & Hypoxia • Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, Blunt BA, Baldwin N, Eisenberg HM,Jane JA, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA. The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma 1993 Feb;34(2):216-22.
Secondary Injury Hypotension & Hypoxia • Severe head injury (GCS score < or = 8) in 717 cases in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank • Impact on outcome of hypotension and hypoxia – Hypotension = SBP < 90 mm Hg – Hypoxia = Pao2 < 60 mm Hg, apnea or cyanosis • Hypoxia and hypotension were independently associated with significant increases in morbidity and mortality from severe head injury
Secondary Injury Cascade Anemia
Ischemia and TBI • Early ischemia (first 12 hrs post-injury) – Global ischemia • severe intracranial hypertension (mass lesion, diffuse swelling) • hypotension • severe diffuse injury – Regional ischemia • contusions • vascular injuries/compression • Early CBF reflects severity of injury • Early ischemia is strongly predictive of early mortality
Ischemia and TBI • Late Ischemia (>12 hr after trauma) – Global - secondary ischemic insults • Intracranial hypertension • Hypotension • Hypoxia • Hypocarbia • Anemia • Fever – Regional - evolving contusions, vasospasm • Late ischemia often can be prevented, or treated if detected early • Late ischemia worsens outcome
PHYSIOLOGY
High energy requirements of the brain • Brain 2% body mass • 20% of cardiac output • 60% of body’s glucose • 20% of consumed oxygen • Low oxygen extraction reserve ( high extraction under normal conditions)
CBF=CPP/CVR CPP=MAP-ICP (CVP) CPP: Cerebral Perfusion Pressure MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure ICP: Intracranial Pressure CBF: Cerebral Blood Flow CVR: Cerebrovascular resistance
CBF Impaired autoregulation Vasogenic edema Chronic Hypertension Ischemia l l 50 150 MAP
Coupling of CMRO2 and CBF mediated by local signals, ATP, nitric oxide NO, adenosine, phospholipid metabolites Very minimal neurogenic influence (sympathetic or parasympathetic) Hydrogen ion mediated
Falling cerebral perfusion Cerebral perfusion pressure Autoregulation, no symptoms Ischaemic symptoms Cerebral blood volume Exhausted reserve O2 extraction fraction Cerebral blood flow Cerebral metabolic rate of O2
Current Opinion in Neurology 2004, 17:705–709
Cerebral ischemia - duration Normal flow, normal function 50 Low flow, raised O2 extraction, normal function CBF (ml/100g brain) 20 Reversible reduced Irreversible function reduced function 0 Time
Compartmentalization of ICP
Brain Tissue Oxygenation Bpt02 Cerebral Multimodal Microdyalisis Neuro- Focal CBF monitoring monitors Continuous EEG monitoring
Brain Tissue Oxygenation • Intraprenchymal catheter with sensor tip • Measures local Po2, PCO2, and pH • Placed similarly to an ICP monitor • Ideally need to target placement in tissue at risk/ischemic penumbra
Cerebral Microdialysis • Intraparenchymal microdialysis catheter inserted in a similar fashion to ICP bolt • Typically measure glucose, lactate, pyruvate to detect ischemia • Excitatory amino-acids • Can measure other molecules (drugs, inflammatory markers
Jugular Bulb Oximetry • Central venous oximetry catheter placed retrograde in IJ, to jugular bulb • Continuous venous saturation Sjo2 • Can detect brain increased oxygen extraction • 55-85% nl values,
Transcranial Doppler • cerebral blood flow velocities • Asses cerebrovascular reserve • Detect cessation of circulation-Brain Death • Pulsatility index for monitoring of edema
Why Regional CBF After TBI?
Heterogeneity of CBF after TBI Histogram of Average rCBF in Cortical ROIs Patients with < 5mm shift Patients with shift and/or mass lesion 40 60 Number of ROI's 30 Diffuse I 50 Number of ROI's 20 40 Diffuse IV 10 30 40 20 Number of ROI's 30 10 Diffuse II 20 40 Number of ROI's 10 30 40 20 Number of ROI's Mass Lesion 30 10 Diffuse III 20 0 100 10 rCBF in ROI 0 100 rCBF in ROI
Global Continuous Monitors – SjvO2 Catheter Indirect Measures of CBF Local PbtO2 Catheter
CPP
Cerebral perfusion pressure • CPP=MAP-ICP – original recommendations for CPP were extrapolated from effects of changing CPP in normals, who have intact autoregulation • ‘CPP management’ stresses primacy of CPP over the actual ICP value – the ‘Lund protocol’ is diametrically opposed, lowering MAP to decrease edema production – both claim improved outcome compared to historical controls • current AANS guidelines specify CPP of 60 mmHg – lower: poorer outcome – higher: more ARDS
CPP: What Target • Reduction in CPP < 60-70 leads to secondary injury from release of glutamate (Vespa et al J Neurosurg 1998) • One CPP does not fit all – Heterogeneous cerebral blood flow – At any given CPP, there are regions of the brain that are oligemic – Different CPP thresholds for different regions of the brain
The Lund Protocol Brain Volume Regulation With Preserved Microcirculation • Based on Physiological Principles • Aim to decrease cranial fluid volume • Maintain cerebral flow • Protect brain from sympathetic mediated fluctuation of CBF
The Lund Protocol • Increase interstitial fluid resorbtion – Maintain COP with normovolemia, normal serum albumin & haemoglobin • Veno-constriction to decrease CBV – Dihydroergotamine • Vasoconstriction of pre-capillary sphincter – Low dose thiopentone & dihydroergotamine • Lower BP : CPP > 50 – Beta 1 (metoprolol) & alfa 2 (clonidine) blockers • Drain CSF via EVD for acute rise of ICP
The Lund Protocol • CCM 1998;26:1881-6 – 5 year study – 53 head injured patients (ICP> 25 & GCS < 8) – Study group • Mortality 8% & Severe brain damage 13% – Historical controls • Mortality 47% & Severe brain damage 11% • CCM 1998;26:1787-8 Comment on above study
The Lund Protocol • 3 independent non randomized trials, using main principles of Lund protocol with good outcome – Naredi S et al. ICM 1998;24:446-51 – Eker et al. CCM 1998;26:1881-6 – Naredi S et al. Acta Anaest. Scand. 2001;45:402-6 • Elf et al CCM 2002;30:129-134 – Good outcome: Principles based ? More on Lund protocol than US guidelines • Naredi S et al. Treatment of traumatic head injury- US/European Guidelines of the Lund Concept. Crit Care Med 2003;31:2713-4
Maximize CPP vs Hyperventilate & Decrease ICP • Staged problems and management in traumatic acute brain injury • Phase of Hypoperfusion – Correct BP & CPP with conventional means • Phase of Hyperemia – Decrease cerebral blood flow with hyperventilation • Phase of Vasospasm – Volume expansion with induced hypertension
Fluid thresholds and outcome from severe brain injury • Retrospective study (from the NIH multicenter hypothermia trial data) of the effect on GOS of ICP, MAP, CPP, and fluid balance at 6 mo after injury • Univariate predictors of poor outcome: – ICP >25 mm Hg – MAP
Fluid thresholds and outcome from severe brain injury • Significant variables in a stepwise logistic regression: – GCS score at admission – Age – MAP 25 mm Hg
Fluid thresholds and outcome from severe brain injury • Conclusions: Exceeding thresholds of ICP, MAP, CPP, and fluid volume may be detrimental to severe brain injury outcome. • Fluid balance lower than -594 mL was associated with an adverse effect on outcome, independent of its relationship to intracranial pressure, mean arterial pressure, or cerebral perfusion pressure.
Maximize CPP vs Hyperventilate & Decrease ICP • Claudia S. Robertson et al Critical Care Medicine 1999;27:2086-2095 – RCT 189 adults – CPP group: CPP>70 & CO2 ~35 mmHg – ICP group:CPP>50 & CO2 25-30 – CPP group had less frequency of jugular desaturation: 50.6% to 30% (p = .006) • Risk of cerebral ischemia 2.5 time greater in ICP group – No difference in neurological outcome – CPP group had 5 fold increase in ARDS (15 vs 3%) • TCDB data: ARDS associated with X 3 mortality in TBI
Effect of various medications on: ICP/CBF Decreases No Change Increases INDUCTION AGENTS Barbiturates Midazolam Ketamine Etomidate Propofol Droperidol MUSCLE RELAXANTS Vecuronium Succinylcholine Atracurium Pancuronium IV AGENTS Lidocaine Narcotics (rare paradox: fentanyl) Benzodiazepines ANTI-HYPERTENSIVES Labetolol Nitroglycerine Beta blockers Nitroprusside ACE inhibitors Hydralazine CA CHANNEL BLOCKERS Nicardipine Nifedipine Verapamil INHALATION AGENTS N2O Isoflurane Enflurane Halothane Adapted from: Manual of Neuroanesthesia, Sperry,1989 Figure 2-3
BP IN OTHER BRAIN INJURIES
Stroke Blood pressure Management BP reduction in acute ischemic stroke might worsen ischemia BP reduction in acute intracerebral hemorrhage might limit hematoma growth
Detrimental effect of blood pressure reduction in the first 24 hours of acute stroke onset NEUROLOGY 2003;61:1047-1051 115 acute stroke patients within 24 hrs OR 95% CI p Age 1.51 per 10-year increase 0.87 –2.64 0.15 NIHSS score 1.55 per 1-point increase 1.28 –1.87
INTERACT • 404 patients with ICH < 6hours • Randomized to SBP
HYPOTENSION
Hypotension after TBI • A common phenomena after brain injury, occuring in one in five cases. • Numerous observational studies have confirmed the association between systemic hypotension occurring at any point after injury and poor outcome. • A single episode of hypotension is associated with approx doubling of mortality and a parallel increase in morbidity. – Persists when age and the presence of hypoxia and extracranial injuries are taken into account • Most commonly due to inadequate volume resuscitation
Fluid Resuscitation: Hypertonic Saline Mechanism of Action Osmotic effect Osmotic effect Via properties of sodium chloride 1. Low permeability across BBB Anti-inflammatory effects 2. Hi reflection coefficient (1.0) Modulation of neuroendocrine Hyperosmolar concentrations system (ANP, VSP) Create a gradient to pull water from interstitial and intracellular spaces into the intravascular Maintain BBB integrity via compartment membrane stabilization Improve regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF)
Hypertonic Saline – Clinical Evidence Cooper et al (JAMA 2004; 291: 1350) Design Prospective RCT of 229 severe TBI and hypotension in the field Bolus with 250 cc 7.5% LR or LR Results No baseline differences between groups Median GCS = 4, ISS 38, fluid = 1250 No difference in Bp on arrival to ED No difference in morbidity or mortality
Hypertonic saline out of hospital TBI • blunt trauma and a prehospital GCSof 8 or less not in hypovolemic shock. • 250 cc bolus 7.5% saline vs NS • Survival at 28 days was 74.3% with hypertonic saline/dextran, 75.7% with hypertonic saline, and 75.1% with normal saline • No difference in functional outcomes JAMA. 2010 Oct 6;304(13):1455-64.
2007 BTF Guidelines A. Hypotensive patients should be treated with isotonic fluids. B. Hypertonic resuscitation is a treatment option for TBI GCS < 8.
2007 BTF Guidelines • B. Level II Blood pressure should be monitored and hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm H B. Level II Aggressive attempts to maintain CPP above 70 mm Hg with fluids and pressors should be avoided because of the risk of ARDS. C. Level III CPP of < 50 mm Hg should be avoided.
You can also read