BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT WITH NORTH OGDEN AT 1512-1514 NORTH WASHINGTON BLVD
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT WITH NORTH OGDEN AT 1512-1514 NORTH WASHINGTON BLVD
To review the proposed boundary adjustment
Approval, 4-1
A developer is proposing to build a 142-unit apartment complex near Ogden’s
border with North Ogden City, at approximately 1514 North Washington Blvd.
The developer would like to build on properties on both sides of the city
boundaries but doing so would result in an inconsistent development.
Developing in two different cities would mean having to gain separate approvals
for site plans, permits, two different utility providers, and separate fire/police
services. It would also mean having two different design standards within a
single development. In order to maintain consistency across the development,
North Ogden City has requested to adjust city boundaries with Ogden and
absorb approximately 1.6 acres from Ogden.
If the Council desires to adjust municipal boundaries, then a resolution must be
passed stating an intent to act. After passing a resolution, and following a 60-
day protest period, the Council may adopt an ordinance approving the boundary
adjustment. North Ogden City must follow through with the same process in
order to finalize the boundary adjustment.
The developer is proposing to build a 142-unit apartment complex, 50 of which
are planned to be built on 1.6 acres in Ogden City. While it is technically
possible for the developer to build across municipal boundaries, the permitting
process and utility connections would be simplified by adjusting the boundaries
and placing the entire development within North Ogden’s boundaries.
There are two properties included in the boundary adjustment—1512 and 1514
Washington Boulevard. 1512 has a home on it, and 1514 is a vacant lot.
Together they form about 1.6 acres. The properties are located just north of a
mobile home park.
Potential Issues
When the Planning Commission discussed this boundary adjustment there was
some concern about light and noise spreading to the mobile home park from
the proposed apartment complex. To mitigate for this issue, the Planning
Commission recommended a 10’ landscaped setback buffer along the north line
of the Washington Mobile Estates park.
Ogden City Council Work Session: May 3, 2022 1
Letter from North Ogden City Manager, April 21, 2021
On April 21, 2021, in a letter addressed to the Ogden City Council, North Ogden
City officially expressed interest in adjusting boundaries. The letter also states
that North Ogden City had recently entered into a development agreement for
the apartment project, and that the agreement supports an adjustment to the
city’s boundaries.
Tax Impact
The 1.6 acres of property brings the city approximately $517 in annual tax
revenue. Greg Montgomery will be presenting an estimation for how much
revenue this project could bring the city if the boundary adjustment doesn’t take
place.
Process
Utah Code section 10-2-419 lays out the process for adjusting a city boundary.
When the legislative bodies of two municipalities intend to adjust a common
boundary, they (1) adopt a resolution indicating the intent to adjust the common
boundary, then (2) hold a public hearing on the proposed adjustment no less
than 60 days after the adoption of the said resolution. Notice of the public
hearing shall be provided at least three weeks prior to the public hearing. Upon
conclusion of the stated public hearing, the municipal legislative body may
adopt an ordinance, per the standards of Utah Code 10-2-425, approving the
boundary adjustment.
POTENTIAL TIMELINE
1. May 3, 2022: Work session to discuss the boundary adjustment.
2. May 10, 2022: Council may adopt a resolution indicating their intent to
adjust the boundary.
3. July 26, 2022: Public hearing. Council may adopt an ordinance
approving the boundary adjustment.
4. The adopted ordinance will become effective if and when both
municipalities involved in the boundary adjustment have adopted an
ordinance.
Public Notice Process
It is important to note that neighbors are not sent mailed notification in the
boundary adjustment process. Notice of the public hearing is provided by
posting in public locations and online at least 3 weeks prior to the meeting.
However, nearby property owners will be notified about any rezones that will
take place on the property—whether the property is in Ogden or North Ogden—
meaning that residents in the mobile home park will receive notification of the
rezone prior to development.
Ogden City Council Work Session: May 3, 2022 2
April 12, 2022 Work Session
The Council met in a work session on April 12, 2022 to receive a presentation
from Planning staff. There was a concern about lost property tax if the
boundary was adjusted. Planning staff was asked to come back and present
information on how much tax revenue could be lost in the case of a boundary
adjustment.
Important Note on Denial
If the council is not interested in adjusting boundaries, it is still important to
take official action on the request. This can be done by denying the resolution
on May 10th. This would send a clear message to North Ogden that the
adjustment process has officially terminated.
To adjust the boundary between Ogden and North Ogden at 1512-1514 North
Washington Blvd. The adjustment would remove 1.6 acres from Ogden City and
place it within North Ogden City.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the boundary adjustment
with a vote of 4-1. Commissioner Southwick voted against the proposal, stating
that it is a bad precedent and bad public policy to exchange boundaries. In
addition to the recommendation to approve, the Planning Commission
recommends the following condition:
• The development should have a 10’ landscaped setback along the north
property line of the Washington Mobile Estates development.
Transmittal
• Council transmittal document
• Planning Staff report to Planning Commission
• Site plan
• Letter from North Ogden City to the Ogden City Council
Council Staff Contact: Ross Watkins, (801) 629-8629
Ogden City Council Work Session: May 3, 2022 3
Planning Division
2549 Washington Blvd.
Memo
Suite 140
Ogden, Utah 84401
To: Ogden City Council
From: Greg Montgomery- Planning Manager
Date: April 26, 2022
Re: Additional Information regarding request for boundary adjustment with
North Ogden at 1514 N Washington Blvd
General Facts
Lot Area- 1.63 acres (70,980 square feet). Earlier number larger because
parcel 11-014-0035 includes a half width of Washington Boulevard.)
Zoning- R-2- allows single family and duplex development. 8 single family
lots could be developed off the proposed North Ogden Road frontage or 8
duplexes (16 units) in a group dwelling arrangement.
Utilities- 8” Ogden sewer line and 8” water line in Washington Boulevard in
front of the property. Lines are behind the curb so no cutting into
Washington required. Presently Ogden fire hydrant in front of property.
Present property tax- Ogden portion $229.44 for 0035 and $288.72 for
0034.
Proposed development
Project- 50 units in two, three story buildings
Density- 30.7 dwelling units an acre.
Parking- 79 outside stalls and 58 stalls in tandem parking configuration.
Total 133 stalls
Probable upper value $17.2 million dollars @$275 a square foot
Future Ogden property tax-$22,675
Ogden building permit fee excluding state percentage- $72,225
North Ogden City
Harrisville City
Ogden City
Boundary Line for Consideration
What would be allowed in Ogden City with different zoning
R-3- Total 31 units in two buildings
R-4/ C-2- Total 41 units in two buildings
R-5/C-3- Total 83 units in two buildings
What Ogden would require to be installed between developments?
8 to 15 feet from property line depending on type of development and impacts.
Had suggested they maintain 10 feet
Submitted to CAO: March 7, 2022
Ogden City Council Transmittal Received by Council:
Consideration of a request for a boundary line adjustment with
North Ogden at 1512 – 1514 North Washington Boulevard
DEPARTMENT: ACTING DIRECTOR:
Community and Economic Development Brandon Cooper
DIVISION: MANAGER:
Planning Greg Montgomery
STAFF: CONTACT:
Damian Rodriguez, Planner 801-629-8921, damianr@ogdencity.com
REQUEST:
Approval of the requested boundary line adjustment with North Ogden City.
REQUESTED TIMELINE:
As soon as possible
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission reviewed this item on March 2, 2022. A motion to recommend approval of
entering a boundary line adjustment with North Ogden was made based on the findings that the
requested boundary line adjustment is in the best interest of the city and is in keeping with the
General Plan provided that the development have a 10’ landscaped setback along the north property
line of the Washington Mobile Estates development.
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS VOTE Yes No
Blaisdell…………………………………………………………………………………. X
Safsten…………………………………………………………………………………… X
Sandau…………………………………………………………………………………… X
Schade…………………………………………………………………………………… X
Southwick……………………………………………………………………………… X
REASONS
Commissioner Southwick voted against the motion of approval of the boundary adjustment, stating
that it is a bad precedent and bad public policy to exchange boundaries.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The City of North Ogden requests the approval of a boundary line adjustment with Ogden City at 1512
and 1514 N Washington Boulevard. The stated properties, which are currently within the boundary of
Ogden City, would thence become part of North Ogden. This request has been made in response to a
development proposal received by North Ogden for a 142-unit multiple-family project that would
Ogden City Council Transmittal Page 1 of 2reside mostly in North Ogden and span across the existing municipal boundary line and involve the properties at 1512 and 1514 N Washington Blvd, Ogden. Staff explained that the subject properties, which are currently vacant, are largely isolated by the Washington Estates Mobile Home Park which creates a physical and communal barrier to the immediate south. Redevelopment of the stated properties in conjunction with the development of the contiguous North Ogden property would result in more continuous and harmonious urban form and negate the possibility of an isolated neighborhood. Approval of the requested boundary line adjustment would simplify the permitting process for the joint development of the Ogden and North Ogden properties and simplify municipal services to the project post development. Brandon Bell of North Ogden was there in representation of North Ogden City. He explained that the development project site plan and associated rezone has been reviewed and approved by the North Ogden City Council contingent on the completion of the requested boundary line adjustment. Referencing the attached letter from Jonathan Call, North Ogden City Manager/Attorney, Brandon also explained that the position of the Council is so that if Ogden City wishes to adjust the boundary between the two municipalities, then North Ogden will accept the two stated Ogden City properties. Representatives of the development company were also in attendance. They expressed concern about Staff’s suggested condition of a 10’ buffer on the north side of the Washington Estates Mobile Home Park property line, stating that their current site plan provided a landscaped buffer of about 5’. They requested that the Planning Commission have leniency on this staff recommended condition. There was some discussion concerning the effectiveness of a wall as a nuisance buffer at the property line shared by the Washington Estates Mobile Home Park and the proposed Cooperstowne Apartments rather than or in addition to the staff-recommended 10’ greenspace buffer. Commissioner Schade voiced some favor in requiring the addition of a 7’ solid wall, expressing faith that such a wall would better serve as a noise buffer than a green space requirement. Commissioner Blaisdell noted that the planting of upright, tall shrubs in a manner that would act as a wall at this property line would be an aesthetic way of providing a noise and light buffer for the residents of the mobile home park in addition to the fence. Utah Code 10-2-419 details the procedure of a municipal boundary adjustment. When the legislative body of two municipalities intend to adjust a common boundary, they (1) adopt a resolution indicating the intent to adjust the common boundary, then (2) hold a public hearing on the proposed adjustment no less than 60 days after the adoption of the said resolution. Notice of the public hearing shall be provided at least three weeks prior to the public hearing. Upon conclusion of the stated public hearing, the municipal legislative body may adopt an ordinance, per the standards of Utah Code 10-2-425, approving the boundary adjustment. The adopted ordinance will become effective when each municipality involved in the boundary adjustment has adopted an ordinance. CONCERNS OF CITIZENS None expressed Ogden City Council Transmittal Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENTS:
• Planning Commission Staff Report.
• Jonathan Call’s Letter
• Ogden City Staff Boundary Adjustment Requirements – Forwarded E-mail
Ogden City Council Transmittal Page 3 of 2OGDEN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Division 02 MARCH 2022 AGENDA ITEM- # 5
Report by Damian Rodriguez
Agenda Name: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A BOUNDARY LINE
ADJUSTMENT WITH NORTH OGDEN AT 1512 – 1514 NORTH WASHINGTON
BLVD
Petitioner/ Developer: Jonathan Call, North Ogden City
505 E 2600 N
North Ogden, UT 84414
jcall@nogden.org
Petitioner/ Developer’s requested action: North Ogden City is requesting the approval of
a municipal boundary line adjustment around two parcels of land of approximately 1.7
acres at the south line of the North Ogden City limit and the north line of the Ogden
City limit at 1512 – 1514 North Washington Boulevard.
What the Planning Commission reviews
The Planning Commission reviews the boundary line adjustment request with the
following considerations
1. Is the boundary adjustment in keeping with the General Plan?
2. Is the boundary adjustment in the best interest of the city?
The Planning Commission makes a recommendation on the subject. The item is then
forwarded to the City Council for final action.
Planning Commission’s determination for action
Possible findings based on the decision the Commission determines appropriate.
1. Recommend denial of the request finding that the action is not in the best
interest of the city and/or is inconsistent with the goals of the general plan
2. Recommend approval of the request finding that the action will not adversely
affect the city and is in keeping with the general plan
Page 1 of 7OGDEN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Division 02 MARCH 2022 AGENDA ITEM- # 5
Planning Staff’s Recommended Action
Planning Staff recommends the approval of the proposed municipal boundary line
adjustment subject to the following
1. North Ogden City mandates a green space buffer of at least 30’ between the
north end of the mobile home park and any future development of the subject
property to protect the property rights of the mobile home unit residents
2. North Ogden City completes the necessary plat work for the boundary
adjustment
Vicinity Map
Page 2 of 7OGDEN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Division 02 MARCH 2022 AGENDA ITEM- # 5
Description of request
The City of North Ogden requests the approval of a boundary line adjustment with
Ogden City where parcels 11-014-0034 (1512 N Washington Blvd) and 11-014-0035
(1514 N Washington Blvd), a total of approximately 1.7 acres of land, would essentially
be de-annexed from Ogden City and annexed by North Ogden City.
North Ogden City has received an application for a development project that if
completed will extend onto the subject Ogden City properties. The proposed multiple-
family project, titled the Cooperstowne Apartments, would be contained mostly in
North Ogden on a 5-acre parcel immediately north of the subject property. See
attachment 4 for details concerning the Cooperstowne Apartments development
project.
The requested municipal boundary line adjustment would streamline the permitting
process and utility connections for the applicant. Additionally, the adjustment would
simplify law enforcement, fire, and emergency services to the property post
construction.
Past History
Factors for consideration of action
1. Is the boundary adjustment in keeping with the General Plan?
There are no aspects of the General Plan or the Mt Lewis Community Plan that
conflict with the request, nor is there any indication of a desire to change the
zoning of the subject parcels.
3. Is the boundary adjustment in the best interest of the city?
The future development of the subject parcels under the current zoning of R-2,
two-family residential, separate from the contiguous North Ogden parcels could
result in an isolated R-2 neighborhood as the contiguous Ogden City property is
zoned for and developed as a residential manufactured home park (RMH-1).
Page 3 of 7OGDEN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Division 02 MARCH 2022 AGENDA ITEM- # 5
Image 2: Contiguous land uses
The mobile home park, shown above, creates a defined boundary edge that
would isolate any single or two-family developments in the highlighted subject
property. A similar boundary would be created on the north side of the subject
properties by the creation of a large multiple-family project on the 5-acre
contiguous property to the north. Staff believes that the development of the
subject property in conjunction with the contiguous North Ogden parcel will
render the most favorable development results.
Consideration shall also be given to the tax consequences of the requested
boundary adjustment. The approximate tax revenue loss resultant from the
boundary adjustment would be a total of $517 annually from Ogden City. This is
based on the combination of the 2021 nominal tax revenue amounts for 11-014-
0035 and 11-014-0034, $229 and $288 respectively.
The most prominent of staff concerns is the loss of general noise and light
protection that the mobile home units currently enjoy under Ogden City Zoning
regulation. Currently, the maximum height of a building next the mobile home
park would be 2.5 stories (35’) and a minimum 30’ landscaped setback would be
required. Changing jurisdictions may remove such protects. For this reason,
Page 4 of 7OGDEN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Division 02 MARCH 2022 AGENDA ITEM- # 5
staff recommends conditioning a minimum 30’ setback on the south side of the
subject property.
Attachments
1. Project Fact Sheet
2. County Plat Map
3. North Ogden City Consideration Letter
4. Cooperstowne Apartments Site Plan
Page 5 of 7OGDEN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Division 02 MARCH 2022 AGENDA ITEM- # 5
ROPERTY INFORMATION
Attachment #1- Project Fact Sheet
Property Address: 1512 N Washington Blvd & 1514 N Washington Blvd
Zone: R-2, Two-Family Residential
Community Plan: Mt. Lewis
Property Size: 1.6 acres
Existing Use: Vacant residential home and a vacant lot
Page 6 of 7OGDEN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Division 02 MARCH 2022 AGENDA ITEM- # 5
Attachment #2- County Plat Map
Map
Page 7 of 7EXIST NORTH OGDEN ANIMAL HOSPITAL NOTES
LOWER EAVE ROOF OVERHANG=4345.95 1. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH NORTH OGDEN CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
CALL BLUESTAKES GROUND ELEVATION=4336.95
R @ 811 AT LEAST 48 HOURS 2. ALL IMPROVEMENTS MUST COMPLY WITH ADA STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
PRIOR TO THE
ENSIGN
3. SEE LANDSCAPE/ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR CONCRETE MATERIAL, COLOR, FINISH, AND SCORE PATTERNS THROUGHOUT SITE.
Know what's below.
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY NORTH POINTE THEATERS SUBDIVISION
Callbefore you dig. CONSTRUCTION. LOT 1 4. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE M.U.T.C.D. (MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES).
1553 THE STANDARD IN ENGINEERING
5. ALL SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED OR REPLACED, INCLUDING TREES AND
BENCHMARK DECORATIVE SHRUBS, SOD, FENCES, WALLS AND STRUCTURES, WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON THE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. LAYTON
STREET MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF
WNCO PROPERTIES LLC 919 North 400 West
6. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY1551
17TH STREET AND WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
FOUND
NOAH DOCS LLC DISCREPANCIES IN DESIGN OR STAKING BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT.
Layton, UT 84041
11-014-0247 11-222-0001
ELEVATION = 4348.77
7. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, UTILITIES, AND SIGNS, ETC. UNLESS Phone: 801.547.1100
OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE PLANS.
x
EXISTING RETAINING WALL 1549 SALT LAKE CITY
8. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
INSTALL 6' VINYL PRIVACY FENCE Phone: 801.255.0529
9. ALL WORK WITHIN THE UDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE PER UDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
x
N 89°56'15"x E 500.47' x x x
TOOELE
NORTH 500.47'
SOUTH
EAST
WEST 500.47'
500.47'
X X X X X X X X X X X X X
10. ALL DETERIORATED, DAMAGED OR 1547
MISSING SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS (I.E. CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING,
PL TO BUILDING
X
PARKSTRIP IMPROVEMENTS, ASPHALT PATCHING, ETC.) SURROUNDING THE PERIMETER OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND ON-SITE, Phone: 435.843.3590
SHALL BE REPLACED OR INSTALLED.
26.9'
27.0'
INSTALL CITY
x
2 2 CEDAR CITY
18.0'
MAINT.
18.0'
MONUMENT SIGN 9.0' 9.0' Phone: 435.865.1453
14.6' 3 SCOPE OF WORK:
INSTALL STREET
PL TO BUILDING
PROVIDE, INSTALL AND/OR CONSTRUCT THE FOLLOWING PER THE SPECIFICATIONS GIVEN OR
LIGHT 1 STALL 4 COVERED STALLS 1 STALL 1 STALL 12 COVERED STALLS 1 STALL 14 STALLS DUMPSTER RICHFIELD
2 STALLS
REFERENCED, THE DETAILS NOTED, AND/OR AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS:
8
2 TANDEM STALLS
76.3'
ENCLOSURE Phone: 435.896.2983
26.0'
26.0'
DUMPSTER 1 INSTALL 24" CURB AND GUTTER
X
9.0'
ENCLOSURE
9 5 9 2 INSTALL 24" REVERSE PAN CURB AND GUTTER
1 3 3 TANDEM STALLS 3 TANDEM STALLS 1
x
8 TANDEM STALLS
3 TRANSITION FROM REVERSE PAN CURB AND GUTTER TO STANDARD CURB & GUTTER
1 STALL
11
WWW.ENSIGNENG.CO
4 MATCH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS
10.0'
2
FOR:
5 INSTALL 3.0' WATERWAY
9.0'
X
WALL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
PHASE 2 5.0' 6 INSTALL 4.0' WATERWAY 1565 W. HILL FIELD ROAD, SUITE 104
6 TANDEM STALLS
8 17.2' 18.0' 26.0' 18.0' 6.0' COLD SPRINGS VILLAGE PRUD LAYTON, UTAH 84041
x
BUILDING A 5
5 STANDARD & 2 HANDICAP STALLS
7 PHASE 2 7
12 COVERED STALLS
INSTALL SIDEWALK CONTACT:
20 PLEX BUILDING B 11 INSTALL 6' VINYL PRIVACY T.J. Wall
10 PARKING STALLS
8 COVERED STALLS
FENCE 8 INSTALL ASPHALT PAVEMENT PER DETAIL 12/C-600 801-444-0001
9 PARKING STALLS
3 STORY PHONE:
20 PLEX
18.0' 18.0' 24.0' 18.0' 5.0' 25.0' 9
3 STORY INSTALL HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMP PER ADA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
X
NORTH POINTE THEATERS
INSTALL 5
STREET
2 10 INSTALL DRIVE APPROACH
x
LIGHT
9
COOPERSTOWNE APARTMENTS
11 INSTALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER DETAIL 13/C-600
9.0'
9.0'
SUBDIVISION
TOTAL PROJECT AREA 12 STREET SECTION PER DETAIL 6/C-600
LOT 1
PHASE 1
2 TANDEM STALLS
313,117 sq.ft.
2
1 STALL
4 7.188 acres 7 13 INSTALL DUAL PARALLEL ADA RAMP PER UDOT STANDARD DETAIL PA 5 WITH GRAY
19.1'
1500 NORTH WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
TRUNCATED DOMES
X
2 TANDEM STALLS
3 9 N
14 INSTALL "TYPE B-1" CURB AND GUTTER PER UDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
x
14 16.6' TOT LOT IO
7 L
VI
2 STALLS
7.2'
PA
382.94'
2 TANDEM STALLS
4 2 PHASE 3 9
24.0'
X
8.4'
S 0°50'15" W
3
NORTH OGDEN, UTAH
8
NORTH 382.94'
SOUTH
EAST
WEST 382.94'
382.94'
7 PARKING STALLS BUILDING E
x
INSTALL BUS STOP WAITING PAD POOL
COMPLETE WITH PLANTER, TRASH 9.0' 32 PLEX 11
8 COVERED STALLS
3
18.0'
RECEPTACLE, BENCH AND BIKE RACK
1 9 3 STORY
6 TANDEM STALLS
430
6.0'
18.0' 26.0' 5 2 OPEN SPACE TABLE
9.0'
INSTALL BUS
SPA
X
STOP SIGN 428 DESCRIPTION AREA (SF) PERCENTAGE
BUILDING D 8
WASHINGTON BOULEVARD
6 TANDEM STALLS
INSTALL 5 426
x
APARTMENT
STREET 20 PLEX 60,782 19%
9.0'
9.0'
529.16'
BUILDING AREA
12 STANDARD & 1 HANDICAP STALL
LIGHT
3 STORY 424 CLUBHOUSE AREA 4,143 1%
7
9 STANDARD &1 HANDICAP STALL
11
2 HANDICAP AND 3 STANDARD STALLS
COMMERCIAL AREA 4,500 1%
14 PARKING STALLS
BUILDING C 2
N 0°50'15" E
X
NORTH 529.16'
SOUTH
EAST
WEST 529.16'
529.16'
PARKING AREA 98,650 31%
10.0' COMMERCIAL
5.0'
8 6.4' 5.0'
9.0'
18.0' 24.0' 18.0'
RIGHT OF WAY
BUILDING 3.0' AREA
64,955 21%
9 CLUBHOUSE 26.0' 18.0'
313,406
9 TOTAL SITE 100%
2 TANDEM STALLS
7.195 ACRES
SITE SUMMARY TABLE
X
13.5' DESCRIPTION AREA (SF) PERCENTAGE
1
INSTALL STREET HARDSCAPE 167,796 54%
25.5'
18.1'
17.8'
LIGHT
15.0'
15.0'
INSTALL STREET
15.0'
24.0' 26.0' ROOF 65,719 21%
7 LIGHT
4 7 LANDSCAPING 79,891 25%
9.5'
4
T 313,406
REE
PROJECT TOTAL SITE 100%
7.195 ACRES
MONUMENT SIGN
13 1 INSTALL CENTERLINE STRIPE
1500 NORTH STREET 1 10 S T
STOP SIGN AND
STREET SIGN
14 TO FIRST ENTRANCE 10 10
RT H APARTMENT PARKING TABLE
N O
60.0'
HANDICAP STALLS 7
12 12
52 5
S 89°56'15" E
1
WEST
EAST
SOUTH
72.89'
NORTH
INSTALL STOP BAR
INSTALL STREET 10 STANDARD STALLS 138
13 1 10 1 LIGHT 72.89'
14 COVERED STALLS 77
4
x x TUCK-UNDER GARAGE STALLS 65
26.0' ADA TUCK-UNDER GARAGE STALLS 4
7
15.0'
22.1'
22.1'
PHASE 4 7
22.2'
21.8'
18.5'
20.4'
22.5'
10.4' IO NA L EN
TANDEM STALLS 69 SS G
E G
I S T E R
IN
E
2 STALLS
F
E
O
R
EE
D
TOTAL STALLS 360
PR
23.5' 7
R
1 2 No. 10234838-2202
X
DENSITY TABLE
8 STALLS
4 BUILDING G
72.0'
9
H
30 PLEX
S
T
R
10.0'
TI
A
RESIDENTIAL AREA 7.195 ACRES A
FE
T E T
OT U
BUILDING F
8 STALLS
M
AF
O F
INSTALL 5.9' 3 STORY HY H
STREET LIGHT 20 PLEX 5.0'
6.0' 18.0' 26.0' 18.0' 1 NUMBER OF UNITS 142 UNITS J A ME S S
HANDICAP STALL
6 STANDARD & 1
3 STORY
9 COVERED STALLS
PARKING STALLS/UNIT 2.5
145.68'
78.6' NO. DATE REVISION BY
DENSITY 19.74 UNITS/ACRE
X
WASHINGTON MOBILE 1 FOR APPROVAL
2
9 2 ESTATES LLC 3
7 9 4
3 11-006-0012
S 0°25'36" W
2 3 NORTH 145.68'
SOUTH
EAST
WEST 145.68'
145.68' 5
6
9 3 2 7
3 TANDEM
3 6 TANDEM STALLS 2 TANDEM STALLS 3
8
2
3 TANDEM STALLS
2 TANDEM 3 TANDEM STALLS 8 TANDEM STALLS
STALLS
STALLS 2
X
8
26.0'
26.0'
OVERALL
26.0'
4
1 STALL
8 DUMPSTER
60.8'
10.0'
10 STALLS
ENCLOSURE
12 COVERED STALLS 2 STALLS 2 STALLS 12 COVERED STALLS 6 STALLS SITE PLAN
14 19.3' 3
INSTALL STREET LIGHT
18.0'
18.0'
18.0'
1
INSTALL 6' VINYL
4 PRIVACY FENCE
5.0' 4.7' X X
4.4' X
X X X X X X X X
S 89°52'20" W 423.46'
NORTH 423.46'
SOUTH
EAST
WEST 423.46'
423.46'
PROJECT NUMBER PRINT DATE
S 89°54'00" W 66.01'
NORTH 66.01'
SOUTH
EAST
WEST 66.01'
66.01'
S 0°50'15" W
WEST
EAST
SOUTH
18.00'
NORTH
8729 11/22/21
INSTALL 6' VINYL PRIVACY FENCE
N 0°50'15" E
WEST
EAST
SOUTH
18.00'
NORTH
18.00' DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
X X X X J.MOSS T.SHAFFER
18.00' WEST
N 90°00'00"
NORTH
SOUTH
EAST 150.95'
150.95'
W 150.95'
150.95'
4 INSTALL 6' VINYL PRIVACY FENCE HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE PROJECT MANAGER
C.PRESTON
WASHINGTON ## 0 ## ## ##
MOBILE ESTATES LLC
11-006-0012
( IN FEET )
HORZ: 1 inch = ## ft.
C-200Rodriguez, Damian
From: Danny W
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 11:54 AM
To: Rodriguez, Damian
Subject: Fwd: [External] RE: Boundary Line Adjustment for Cooperstowne
[External Email] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Damian,
I'll give you a call to discuss this. It is about the boundary line adjustment for Cooperstown.
Thanks,
Danny
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Stratford, Mark
Date: Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Boundary Line Adjustment for Cooperstowne
To: Danny W
Cc: Cam Preston , Trent Williams , Montgomery, Greg
Danny,
Here is where I think we are with the city boundary adjustment.
1. You need to provide us with a written request (which can be an email) to adjust the city property line with North
Ogden in order for your development to be constructed entirely within North Ogden. Please identify the land
based on land serial numbers in that request.
2. On the request please indicate how you intend to protect the residential areas in Ogden City from lights (both
vehicle and building lights) from the development. Greg Montgomery has reviewed the site plan you sent to me
and had the following comments for options to address vehicle lights:
After looking at what would we allow if this development was in Ogden the 10 foot landscaped
setback would meet our standard planter width. We would require a denser landscaping to screen the
car lights from shining into the existing modular housing or a change of the fence from the 6 foot tall
slated chain link fence to a solid fence material that does not allow lights and partial visibility. I would
suggest that there be two options allowed either a solid 7’ tall fence that does not allow visibility
through the fence along the property line of Washington Mobile Estates or upgrade the landscaping to
evergreen upright junipers or arborvitae that have as a growth height a minimum of 8 feet and are
spaced a maximum of 5 feet on center to block the lights created by the parking next to the units.
13. Trent is working on the boundary adjustment plat, but that does not need to be complete in order for you to
make the request. It will need to be complete before I can produce the ordinance for the city council.
4. This will require review by the Ogden City Planning Commission. In order to meet their scheduling deadline, you
should submit the request by this Friday.
Please contact me with questions.
Thanks-
Mark H. Stratford
Assistant City Attorney
Ogden City Attorney’s Office
(801) 629-8145
From: Danny W
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 12:12 PM
To: Stratford, Mark
Cc: Cam Preston ; Trent Williams
Subject: Re: [External] RE: Boundary Line Adjustment for Cooperstowne
Mark, Trent & Cam,
Have you made any progress on the boundary adjustment for the Cooperstowne project? Do you have the information
that you need?
2You can also read
