BIS Working Papers No 694 - Exchange Rates and the Working Capital Channel of Trade Fluctuations

Page created by Rick Rios
 
CONTINUE READING
BIS Working Papers
No 694
Exchange Rates and the
Working Capital Channel
of Trade Fluctuations
by Valentina Bruno, Se-Jik Kim and Hyun Song Shin

Monetary and Economic Department

January 2018

JEL classification: F36, F41, G20

Keywords: global value chains, dollar invoicing, global
liquidity
BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic
Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other
economists, and are published by the Bank. The papers are on subjects of topical
interest and are technical in character. The views expressed in them are those of their
authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS.

This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org).

©   Bank for International Settlements 2018. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be
    reproduced or translated provided the source is stated.

ISSN 1020-0959 (print)
ISSN 1682-7678 (online)
Exchange Rates and the Working Capital Channel
                        of Trade Fluctuations
                           By VALENTINA B RUNO , S E -J IK K IM AND H YUN S ONG S HIN

   Global value chains (GVCs) figure promi-                             ico where it is finished. At any given date, the
nently in global trade and lie at the intersection                      firm carries three pieces of inventories - the en-
of two important themes. The first is the financ-                       gine, semi-finished car and the finished car.
ing requirement for working capital. The second                            The three pieces of inventory differ in value,
is the prevalence of dollar invoicing in global                         reflecting past value-added. Suppose, for sim-
trade.                                                                  plicity, that the engine has value w, the semi-
   The upshot of the interaction of these two                           finished car has value 2w and finished car has
themes is that the dollar exchange rate emerges                         value 3w. In this example, financing need in-
as a determinant of GVC activity. Specifically,                         creases at the rate of the square of the length of
a stronger dollar is associated with tighter credit                     the supply chain, as the total value of inventories
conditions and subdued GVC activity. As a re-                           at any moment in time is the sum w C 2w C 3w.
sult, exports from an emerging economy may                                 If the GVC crosses the boundary of the firm,
fall when its currency depreciates against the                          the working capital needs show up as accounts
dollar. Our paper highlights this financial chan-                       receivable, not inventories, but the principle is
nel of the dollar on global trade.                                      the same. Financing needs for working capital
   In Thomas Friedman’s book The World is                               increase rapidly with the length of the GVC.
Flat, a logistics executive is quoted as saying                            Given their financing requirements, long,
“[w]hen our grandfathers owned shops, inven-                            elaborate GVCs are sustainable only with plen-
tory was what was in the back room. Now it is a                         tiful financing. Anil Kashyap, Owen Lamont
box two hours away on a package car, or it might                        and Jeremy Stein (1994) show that inventories
be hundreds more crossing the country by rail or                        of firms that depend more on external financing
jet, and you have thousands more crossing the                           fall more sharply in response to a contraction in
ocean.” [Friedman (2005, p.174)]                                        credit supply.
   The picture of boxes whizzing around the                                Our contribution is to extend these insights to
world is a marvel not only of modern communi-                           a global context where dollar credit conditions
cations but also of finance, as those boxes are in-                     take on a central role due to the prevalence of
ventories of the firm. On the balance sheet, they                       dollar invoicing in global trade (Gita Gopinath
enter as assets and must be financed somehow.                           (2015) and Gopinath and Stein (2017)). The
Long supply chains entail substantial financing                         Bank for International Settlements (2014) esti-
needs, which increases in a non-linear way with                         mates that globally, around 80 percent of bank
the length of the supply chain.                                         trade credit is denominated in US dollars.
   To see this, consider an auto manufacturer                              The upshot of the global role of the dollar in
with plants in Japan, Canada and Mexico. The                            trade finance is that the dollar exchange rate af-
firm makes engines in Japan and ships it to its                         fects not only the competitiveness of exports but
plant in Canada, where it undergoes further as-                         also affects credit conditions for working capi-
sembly. The semi-finished car then goes to Mex-                         tal. We build on the literature on the risk-taking
                                                                        channel of exchange rates due to Bruno and Shin
     Bruno: Kogod School of Business, American University,
4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA,                   (2015a, b), where a stronger dollar is associ-
bruno@american.edu. Kim: School of Economics, Seoul                     ated with tighter dollar credit conditions. The
National University, San 56-1, Silim-dong, Kwanak-ku, Seoul
151- 742, Korea, skim@snu.ac.kr. Shin: Bank for International
                                                                        mechanism is as follows. In the presence of cur-
Settlements, Centralbahnplatz 2, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.            rency mismatches on borrowers’ balance sheets,
We thank Raphael Auer, Ryan Banerjee, Stijn Claessens, Ingo             a weaker dollar flatters the balance sheet of dol-
Fender, Phurichai Rungcharoenkitkul, Jesse Schreger, Ilhyock
Shim and Jeremy Stein, for comments and discussions. The                lar borrowers, whose liabilities fall relative to
views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not       assets. From the standpoint of bank creditors,
necessarily reflect those of the BIS.
                                                                    1
2

the stronger credit position of borrowers reduces                       Labor is provided inelastically. Wage is w,
tail risk in a diversified credit portfolio of dollar                and cannot be deferred. There is no physical
loans and creates spare lending capacity by re-                      capital. Cashflows are given in Figure 1. The
laxing the Value-at-Risk (VaR) constraint. An                        first positive cashflow to the chain comes at date
immediate implication is that the broad dollar                       n C 1 when firm 1 sells the final output for y .n/.
index is the relevant exchange rate for this chan-
nel.1                                                                 Working capital is needed to finance the accu-
   Our empirical hypothesis is as follows. In an                     mulated “triangle” of wage costs:
environment of long GVCs fostered by a long
                                                                                         2 n .n
                                                                                         1
period of easy dollar credit conditions, the tight-                  (2)                          C 1/ w
ening of dollar credit associated with a stronger
dollar will curtail GVC activity. Our hypoth-                        Since there are L=n production chains, the ag-
esis complements the invoicing explanation in                        gregate financing requirement in the economy,
Camila Casas, Federico Diez, Gita Gopinath,                          denoted by K , is
and Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas (2016) for why                                                                         L
a stronger dollar may result in weaker global                                   K   D     2 n .n
                                                                                          1
                                                                                                   C 1/ w
                                                                                                                     n
trade. In our empirical exercise, we use balance                                          1
sheet proxies for the length of GVCs to highlight                    (3)            D     2   .n C 1/ wL
the risk-taking channel of exchange rates, link-
ing the working capital demands of GVCs to the                          Consider the social planner’s problem, which
fluctuations of the US dollar exchange rate.                         is to choose n to maximize steady state surplus:
         I.    Benchmark “Austrian” Model                                   5 D n L               wL        rK
                                                                                                                 r .nC1/
   Before introducing the invoicing role of the                      (4)         D n L            wL 1 C             2
dollar, we develop intuition on working capital
in a closed economy context following Kim and                        where r is the financing cost. The first-order
Shin (2013).                                                         condition for n gives
   Suppose there are L workers, each matched                                                                1
with one of L plants. Plants are organized into                      (5)                nD
                                                                                                  2     1

production chains of length n in which the out-                                                   wr
put of plant k is the input to plant k 1, and each
step in the production process takes one unit of
time. Total revenue of a chain of length n is                           We close the model with the zero profit condi-
                                                                     tion: n D w .1 C r .n C 1/ =2/. Optimal chain
(1)           y .n/ D n l;          .0 <       < 1/                  length n can be solved in closed form as

where l is total labor employed by the chain.                                                          2
                                                                     (6)            nD                   C1
  This formulation of production echoes Eugen                                            1             r
Böhm-Bawerk’s (1884, p. 88) notion of “round-
about production” where intermediate goods are                       implying that n is decreasing in financing cost r .
used as inputs and where “[t]he indirect method                      Output per worker is
entails a sacrifice of time but gains the advan-                                                       2
tage of an increase in the quantity of the prod-                     (7)                                 C1
uct. Successive prolongations of the roundabout                                     1                  r
method of production yield further quantitative                      which declines in r , reflecting shorter chain
increases though in diminishing proportion.”                         length. The wage w is
     1 Stefan Avdjiev, Bruno, Catherine Koch and Shin (2017)                                                     1
                                                                                                       1
show that the broad dollar index acts as a global risk factor that   (8)        wD2
affects real investment, while Avdjiev, Wenxin Du, Koch and                               r            2Cr
Shin (2016) show that the deviation from covered interest parity
is also explained by the broad dollar index.                         so that w also declines in r . Total credit for
3

                                                            Firms                                 Cumulative
                                       1              2                n       1           n       cashflow
                           1                                                                w            w
                           2                                               w                w         3w
                           ::                                                                          ::
              date          :                                                w               w          :
               t       n        1                       w                    w               w    1
                                                                                                  2 .n      1/ nw
                        n                  w            w                    w               w    2 n .n
                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                           C 1/ w
                       nC1          y .n/ w             w                    w               w
                        ::               ::           ::                   ::              ::
                         :                :            :                    :               :
                                       F IGURE 1. C ASHFLOWS IN PRODUCTION          CHAIN

working capital is                                                  note that shipping and customs delays can be as
                                                                    long as two months. To capture this feature, we
      K   D    1
               2   .n C 1/ wL                                       assume that if an intermediate good is shipped to
                                                                    another location, transport takes one period of
(9)       D        1
                            2
                            r   C1      r   C   1
                                                2Cr   L
                                                                    time, which is the same as the time needed for
                                                                    completing one step in the production process.
   We may interpret K as aggregate credit de-                       Also for simplicity, assume that offshoring also
mand. The model can be closed by introducing                        entails labor input cost w. The firm meets work-
a credit supply function S .r / which is increas-                   ing capital needs by borrowing in dollars at in-
ing in r . Setting (9) equal to credit supply gives                 terest rate r .
us the market clearing r .
                                                                       Offshoring lengthens the time needed for
   Anticipating the solution for r , we can take r
                                                                    production and entails higher financing needs.
as a proxy for the tightness of credit supply. The
                                                                    When production takes m C n periods the de-
tighter are credit conditions, the shorter is the
                                                                    mand for dollar credit, denoted by K , is
supply chain.
                                                                                                                  L
  II.     Working capital needs from offshoring
                                                                           K       D       2 .m C n/.m C n C 1/w mCn
                                                                                           1

                                                                                           2 .m C n C 1/ wL
                                                                                           1
                                                                    (12)           D
   We now introduce dollar financing. Consider
a multinational firm whose product has m stages                     where L is the world labor force. Per period
of production, given exogenously. Assume also                       profit of a firm which employs all the labor is
that there are m production locations, where
each location has an absolute advantage in one                       5 D .m C bn/ L                  wL        rK
stage of the production process. Revenue is as-                                                                        r .mCnC1/
                                                                           D .m C bn/ L              wL 1 C                 2
sumed to be
           Pm                                                       The firm chooses n to maximize 5. The first-
(10)          iD1 x i    .0 < < 1/
                                                                    order condition for n yields
where xi D 1 C b for constant b > 0 if pro-                                                                        1
duction of the ith stage takes place in the most                                                     2b        1
                                                                    (13)               m C bn D
favorable location, while xi D 1 if the produc-                                                      wr
tion takes place elsewhere. If the firm produces
n stages of the production process in the best lo-                  and the zero profit condition is
cation for that stage, total revenue is
                                                                                                               r .mCnC1/
                                                                    (14)           .m C bn/ D w 1 C                 2
(11)           A .m; n/ D .m C bn/
                                                                    From (13) and (14) we solve for n.
The firm chooses n, the extent of offshoring.
  Offshoring entails substantial working capital                                                           2               1   m
                                                                    (15)       nD                mC1C
needs. Mary Amiti and David Weinstein (2011)                                           1                   r           1       b
4

                                 F IGURE 2. W ORKING CAPITAL AND   THE DOLLAR

    We can also solve for the wage as a function of     and inventories, all pre-normalized by total as-
r , w.r /. Substituting (15) and w.r / into (12) we     sets. The panel regressions include industry and
obtain the demand for dollar credit K .r / which        country fixed effects. Standard errors (in brack-
is decreasing in r .                                    ets) are clustered at the 3 digit SIC code level.
    We close the model by introducing a sup-               The key explanatory variable is the change
ply function for dollar credit S .d; r /, which in-     in the broad US dollar real effective exchange
creases in r , but decreases in d, interpreted as the   rate (USD Broad) from the BIS. A higher USD
broad dollar index. Since dollar credit supply is       Broad indicates a stronger dollar. Control vari-
decreasing in d, we conclude that n is decreasing       ables include sales growth, ratio of cash to total
in d. We summarize our result as follows.               assets, cash flows to total assets, property plants
                                                        and equipment to total assets. All explanatory
PROPOSITION 1: GVC length n is decreasing               variables are lagged by one year.
in the value of the dollar.
                                                           Table 1 shows that a one point increase in the
III.   The dollar and working capital: evidence         broad dollar index is associated with a decline
                 from a panel of firms                  in the annual growth of accounts receivable by
                                                        0.28% (column 1), a decline in payables growth
   We examine how the dollar co-moves with              by 0.62% (not reported), and a decline in in-
balance sheet proxies for GVC activity, such            ventory growth by 0.40% (not reported). All
as inventories, accounts receivable and accounts        are significant at the 1 percent level. When we
payable. The sample covers a balanced panel of          use the bilateral exchange rate vis-à-vis the US
2,505 non-financial firms in Asia (China, India,        dollar, the association between the dollar and
Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Ko-         the change in account receivables (column 2),
rea, Thailand, and Vietnam) for the period 2000-        payables and inventories is no longer statisti-
2016, using annual data from Capital IQ.                cally significant. This evidence confirms ear-
   The left hand panel of Figure 2 plots the me-        lier studies that the broad US dollar index is
dian reading of the growth in the inventories to        the relevant exchange rate for the financial chan-
total assets ratio (left axis), together with the       nel of exchange rates (Stefan Avdjiev, Wenxin
broad US dollar index (right axis). A high read-        Du, Catherine Koch and Shin (2017), Avdjiev,
ing of the dollar index indicates a strong dollar.      Bruno, Koch and Shin (2017)), as the broad dol-
We see that a stronger dollar is associated with        lar exchange rate best captures the financial im-
slower growth of inventories.                           pact of the exchange rate on global banks with a
   The pattern in Figure 2 is confirmed in the          diversified global portfolio of dollar loans.
panel regressions using firm-level data. As                Next, we interact 1USD Broad with an
dependent variables, we take annual percent-            industry-level indicator of external financial de-
age changes in account receivables, payables,           pendence FINDEP due to Raghuram Rajan and
5

                                      TABLE 1—W ORKING C APITAL AND THE US DOLLAR .

                                      (1)          (2)          (3)        (4)         (5)          (6)          (7)
       Dependent variable                                  1Receivables                          1Payables   1Inventories
       Sample                         All          All          All       Manu      non-Manu       Manu         Manu
       1USD Broad                  -0.2856                   -0.2709     -0.2670     -0.3398      -0.6728      -0.3932
                                   [0.0640]                  [0.0656]    [0.0764]    [0.1640]     [0.1213]     [0.0599]
       1USD Bilateral                           -0.1002
                                                [0.0716]
       1USD Broad*FINDEP                                     -0.0589     -0.0597    -0.0323       -0.0530      -0.0226
                                                             [0.0142]    [0.0134]   [0.1313]      [0.0300]     [0.0084]
       Constant                     0.1354       0.1358       0.3954      0.0188     0.3408       -0.1317       -0.0503
                                   [0.0159]     [0.0236]     [0.0182]    [0.0219]   [0.0309]      [0.0318]     [0.0115]
       Observations                 88,136       88,136       84,241      57,037     27,204        55,821       56,663

Luigi Zingales (1998) to see whether firms                              balance sheet proxies of GVC activity. Sec-
with higher external financing needs are affected                       ond, the relevant exchange rate is the broad
more by an appreciation of the US dollar.2 The                          dollar index, in line with previous studies that
right hand panel of Figure 2 shows a preview                            have found that dollar lending by global banks
of the results; it plots the changes in account                         fluctuates with the broad dollar index. Third,
payables, normalized to 2011 levels, for the sub-                       the working capital of manufacturing firms is
set of manufacturing firms divided into those                           affected more by a stronger dollar than non-
with high financing needs and low financing                             manufacturing firms. We take these findings
needs (33 vs 66 percentile of FINDEP, left axis).                       as evidence that for GVCs with high financ-
We see that a stronger dollar (right axis) is in-                       ing needs, a stronger dollar is associated with
deed associated with a more marked decrease in                          a tightening of dollar credit and a higher hurdle
payables for firms with high external financial                         rate for GVC sustainability.
dependence.
   In the regression estimates, the coefficient on                                  IV.      Concluding Remarks
the interaction term 1USD Broad*FINDEP is
                                                                           The philosopher René Descartes famously ar-
negative and statistically significant at the 1 per-
                                                                        gued that the nature of the mind is distinct from
cent level, suggesting that firms more depen-
                                                                        that of the body, and that it is possible for one
dent on external financing suffer a larger de-
                                                                        to exist without the other. Similarly, in debates
crease in account receivables (column 3). When
                                                                        about globalization, there is sometimes a ten-
we split the sample into manufacturing (column
                                                                        dency to draw a sharp distinction between real
4) and non-manufacturing firms (column 5), the
                                                                        and financial openness, coupled with the claim
interaction term 1USD Broad*FINDEP is sig-
                                                                        that real openness, associated with trade and
nificant only for manufacturing firms, lending
                                                                        investment, can be achieved without financial
weight to the hypothesis that GVC activity is af-
                                                                        openness. In practice, it turns out to be exceed-
fected by dollar strength. In terms of economic
                                                                        ingly difficult to prise apart real and financial
magnitude, a one point increase in the broad dol-
                                                                        openness. Global trade and the role of GVCs
lar index is associated with an additional decline
                                                                        is a good example of this maxim.
in growth of account receivables by 0.03% for
                                                                           The message of our paper is that, paradoxi-
manufacturing firms that are dependent on exter-
                                                                        cally, a weaker currency against the dollar may
nal financing (66 vs. 33 percentile of FINDEP).
                                                                        actually serve to dampen trade volumes, rather
Similar results hold for accounts payable (col-
                                                                        than stimulate them. Our findings comple-
umn 6) and inventories (column 7).
                                                                        ment the findings in Casas et al. (2016) that
   Overall, we conclude the following. First, a
                                                                        when trade between third countries is invoiced
strong dollar is associated with weak growth of
                                                                        in dollars, a stronger dollar dampens exports.
    2 We thank Stijn Claessens, Hui Tong, and Shang-Jin Wei
                                                                        Our explanation centered on financial conditions
for sharing their data series on financial dependence. Results
                                                                        complements explanations where working cap-
are robust to the inclusion of firm fixed effects or clustering of      ital mitigates incentive problems in production
standard errors at the firm level.                                      chains, thereby acting as the “glue” that binds
6

the components of global value chains. Kim and       Kashyap, Anil, Owen Lamont and Jeremy
Shin (2012) and Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan, Kim,           Stein (1994) “Credit Conditions and the Cycli-
Shin, Bent Sorensen and Sevcan Yesiltas (2014)       cal Behavior of Inventories” Quarterly Journal
present arguments along these lines.                 of Economics, 109, 565-592.
                                                     Kim, Se-Jik and Hyun Song Shin (2012)
                  REFERENCES                         “Sustaining Production Chains Through Fi-
                                                     nancial Linkages” American Economic Re-
    Amiti, Mary, and David E. Weinstein (2011)       view,102 (3), 402-06.
    “Exports and Financial Shocks.” Quarterly        Kim, Se-Jik and Hyun Song Shin (2013)
    Journal of Economics, 126, 1841–1877             “Productivity and Trade: a Working Capital
    Avdjiev, Stefan, Valentina Bruno, Catherine      Perspective”, working paper.
    Koch and Hyun Song Shin (2017) “Dollar ex-       Rajan, Raghuram and Luigi Zingales
    change rate as a global risk factor: evidence    (1998). “Financial Dependence and Growth”
    from investment” paper for the 2017 IMF An-      American Economic Review, 88, 559-586.
    nual Research Conference
    Avdjiev, Wenxin Du, Koch and Shin (2016)
    “The dollar, bank leverage and the deviation
    from covered interest parity” BIS Working Pa-
    per, 592.
    Bank for International Settlements (2014)
    “Trade finance: developments and issues”
    CGFS Papers, number 50.
    Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen (1884) Capital and In-
    terest, Translated by George D. Huncke and
    Hans F. Sennholz, Libertarian Press, South
    Holland, IL 1959.
    Bruno, Valentina and Hyun Song Shin
    (2015a) “Cross-Border Banking and Global
    Liquidity” Review of Economic Studies, 82 (2),
    535-564.
    Bruno and Shin (2015b) “Capital flows and
    the risk-taking channel of monetary policy”
    Journal of Monetary Economics, 71, 119-32.
    Casas, Camila, Federico Diez, Gita
    Gopinath, and Pierre-Olivier Gourin-
    chas (2016) “Dominant currency paradigm”
    working paper.
    Friedman, Thomas (2005) The World is Flat,
    Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York.
    Gopinath, Gita (2016) “The International
    Price System” Proceedings of the Federal Re-
    serve Bank of Kansas City Symposium at Jack-
    son Hole.
    Gopinath, Gita and Jeremy Stein (2017)
    “Banking, trade and the making of a dominant
    currency” paper for the 2018 AEA meeting.
    Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem, Kim, Shin, Bent
    Sorensen and Sevcan Yesiltas (2014) “Finan-
    cial shocks in production chains” working pa-
    per.
Previous volumes in this series

       No                          Title                                     Author
693             Family first? Nepotism and corporate          Gianpaolo Parise, Fabrizio Leone
January 2018    investment                                    and Carlo Sommavilla

692             Central Bank Forward Guidance and the         Stephen Morris and Hyun Song
January 2018    Signal Value of Market Prices                 Shin

691             Effectiveness of unconventional monetary      Andrew Filardo and Jouchi
January 2018    policies in a low interest rate environment   Nakajima

690             Nonlinear State and Shock Dependence of       Hernán Rincón-Castro and
January 2018    Exchange Rate Pass-through on Prices          Norberto Rodríguez-Niño

689             Estimating unknown arbitrage costs: evidence Kristyna Ters and Jörg Urban
January 2018    from a three-regime threshold vector error
                correction model

688             Global Factors and Trend Inflation            Gunes Kamber and Benjamin Wong
January 2018

687             Searching for Yield Abroad: Risk-Taking       John Ammer, Stijn Claessens,
January 2018    through Foreign Investment in U.S. Bonds      Alexandra Tabova and Caleb
                                                              Wroblewski

686             Determinants of bank profitability in         Emanuel Kohlscheen, Andrés
January 2018    emerging markets                              Murcia Pabón and Julieta Contreras

685             Why so low for so long? A long-term view of   Claudio Borio, Piti Disyatat, Mikael
December 2017   real interest rates                           Juselius and Phurichai
                                                              Rungcharoenkitkul

684             Triffin: dilemma or myth?                     Michael D Bordo and Robert N
December 2017                                                 McCauley

683             Can macroprudential measures make             Előd Takáts and Judit Temesvary
December 2017   crossborder lending more resilient?

682             Bank business models: popularity and          Rungporn Roengpitya, Nikola
December 2017   performance                                   Tarashev, Kostas Tsatsaronis and
                                                              Alan Villegas

                All volumes are available on our website www.bis.org.
You can also read