An Integrated Business Approach and Implementing Change at Halfords - Chris Hall Head of Quality & Cost Reduction, Halfords
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
An Integrated Business Approach and Implementing Change at Halfords Chris Hall Head of Quality & Cost Reduction, Halfords
Halfords Background z UK Based z “To deliver travel and leisure solutions to people on the move through market leading knowledge, choice and service” z FTSE 250 – Mkt Cap ~ ££800m z Auto, Leisure and Cycling markets z Sales £744m (+6.0% LFL) z Gross Profit 51%, Operating Profit 13% z Multi-site Retailer (423 stores)- UK, INTERNATIONAL z 3 Central DC’s z 90% Delivered from DC’s z 20% Far East Sourcing
Key drivers for change z High percentage of no fault found z Higher value products being sold z Little idea of the cost of the liberal customer returns policy z The structure of stores stock write-off and the impact on behaviour z Lack of visibility and management reporting z Returns avoidance strategies not fully leveraged z ~ £100k/mth write-off “lost in transit” z Lack of accountability for faulty goods costs management in the organisation
New Returns Process Implementation Timeline Part 2 1st Period Returns Process Supplier Returns Terms & Conditions Report issued to Exec and agreed w ith Trading Team High returns product Senior Managers range Corrective Action Improved "jamboree" box Plans agreed disposal agreement Daily collections, Electric ride-on toys pilot significantly im proved Returns started to be Spares Helpline launched yield 70% reduction in integrated into usual business returns over busiest Five top cost savings review s-ongoing trading period opportunities agreed. >£1m 06/07 Review of Customer Returns/Refund Policy Greater clarity and Progress presentation to Exec visibility of policies for custom ers and staff Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07
Presentation to the Executive Team z Reverse Logistics: A Vision for Best-Practice Returns Process z Costing and performance indicators were used as part of the justification for a new approach z Improvements to Financial KPIs and the bottom line z Received project approval z Approval to recruit Returns Manager in a Commercial role
Implementation approach: “Eating an elephant!”
New Returns Process Implementation Timeline Part 1 First Rev Share trials Launch
New Returns Process Implementation Timeline Part 2 1st Period Returns Process Supplier Returns Terms & Conditions Report issued to Exec and agreed w ith Trading Team High returns product Senior Managers range Corrective Action Improved "jamboree" box Plans agreed disposal agreement Daily collections, Electric ride-on toys pilot significantly im proved Returns started to be Spares Helpline launched yield 70% reduction in integrated into usual business returns over busiest Five top cost savings review s-ongoing trading period opportunities agreed. >£1m 06/07 Review of Customer Returns/Refund Policy Greater clarity and Progress presentation to Exec visibility of policies for custom ers and staff Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07
Questions to be answered z Use of quality costing ideas – prevention, appraisal and failure costs? z In the returns process – what are the failure costs? z In the returns process – what are the appropriate KPI’s related to the failure costs? z In the returns process – what are the prevention costs? z In the returns process – what are the appropriate KPI’s related to the prevention costs? z What about opportunity costs?
New Monthly/Period Returns Process Report - Contents Contents :- Page 1. Contents Page Page 2 to 4 Comments on Tables and Graphs included in P1 Returns Report Page 5. FAGO Returned to DC volume graph YTD Page 6.
Top 40
Store In Car Technology Compliance on Returns P5 06/07 to P1 07/08 ICT Store Compliance P5 to P1 12000 18 16 % FAGO Charged Back to Stores 10000 14 Volume of ICT FAGO 8000 12 10 Total ICT FAGO 6000 8 % of ICT Charged 4000 6 Back to Store 4 2000 2 0 0 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 P1 Period Trend :- P1 shows an increase in non compliance from stores for the first time in seven months to 3.7% of all ICT FAGO returns. Stores and Area Managers are vigilant in this area and this Period is expected to be an anomaly. Target for Chargeback for non-compliance less than 2%
Some Costs of Failure and Prevention Failure costs: • Stock write-offs • Staff time involved • Transport • Warehouse space utilised • Triple-handling • Customer dissatisfaction Prevention costs: • Clearer instructions to both stores and customers • Training store staff to prevent customer returns • Monitoring and reporting
Some potential KPI’s z Cycle time – returns from stores / money back from supplier z Cycle time – returns from stores / products sent back to supplier z % space taken up in warehouse by returned products z Failed debit notes / Successful debit note z Returns by stores relative to trained employees z Store training cost relative to benchmarked cost z % No fault found z Reduced transport miles through collaboration with others z Benchmarked figures
Key Performance Indicators z Changing behaviour z Use of league tables (stores, suppliers, products, product managers,…) z Use of non financial and financial measures of performance (Balanced Scorecard) z Use of sustainability measures?
The way forward Network Asset management infrastructure Supply chain Specialist service strategy providers Outbound / inbound Integrate Reduce Collaborate Shared services Re-use Recycle Process Competitors management Te Evaluate ch led n olo ab En gy Performance Sustainability measures Cost
Halfords participation in the Dept for Transport Reverse Logistics project “The DfT reverse logistics project had a major influence on the introduction of new reverse logistics processes within Halfords. It helped increase awareness of the issues and the large potential for improvement to both bottom line performance and customer service, through introduction of improved processes. The identification of new tools and the support provided by discussions at the workshops played a vital part in the implementation of change at Halfords”
Implementing Change: Halfords learning • engage Finance Director early! • gain full commitment from Senior Management • get VISIBILITY of issues • seek out quick-wins • approach: “eating an elephant”- bite-size chunks • regular progress reports to Senior Management • seek support to keep your motivation/energy • benchmark approaches • dedicated resource (self-funding)
Thank you for your attention. Any further questions?
You can also read