ADMARKET STUDY 2014 THE ATL ADVERTISING SECTION - QUANTITATIVE B2B RESEARCH REPORT
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
www.ddresearch.ro Quantitative B2B Research Report AdMarket Study 2014 The ATL Advertising Section February - May 2014 Prepared for: © D&D Research 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS METHODOLOGY [OBJECTIVES & DESIGN] 3 [DATA GATHERING] 5 DETAILED REPORTING [GENERAL PERCEPTION OF ADVERTISING ACTIVITIES] 7 [AWARENESS] 11 [USAGE. GENERAL USAGE] 16 [ADVERTISING AWARDS] 55 [USAGE. PAYMENT ELEMENTS] 24 [GENERAL PERCEPTIONS] 57 [SERVICES/ACTIVITIES] 28 [PEOPLE PERCEPTIONS] 76 [SATISFACTION. LOYALTY] 32 [“DEMOGRAPHICS”] 79 2 www.ddresearch.ro
3 www.ddresearch.ro METHODOLOGY ↘ CENTRAL AIM of the research was to assess the „current state of affairs” of the Advertising Community in Romania on three of its main branches: Media, Digital and ATL. This aim was attained by measuring key relevant parameters within the following dimensions: A Perception elements – or how is the main corpus of Clients perceiving the active entities from the Advertising Community: i.e. awareness, “usage”, satisfaction, key traits etc. B Usage and attitudes elements – what are the key working habits of the Clients into what regards collaboration with companies within the Advertising Community: i.e. criteria for agency selection, motives to cease collaboration, pitch habits, budgets etc. C Participant company relevant descriptors – e.g. active market domains / industry branch, turnover, number of active brands etc. [≡] Please note that this report focuses on the ATL branch of the Advertising Community.
↘ RESEARCH DESIGN Methodology: Business to Business approach, semi-structured interview, deployed face to face (PAPI) by field executives using a custom made printed questionnaire Category: relevant data incumbents from companies that have been clients for the Media Advertising Agencies INSTRUMENT Custom made questionnaire focused on ATL Agencies build to measure all elements established as objectives. The questionnaire has 47 items. Average interview duration on this questionnaire (ATL section only) was 25 minutes. 4 www.ddresearch.ro
5 www.ddresearch.ro SAMPLE The participants were 133 individuals in charge of the media communication activities in 122 commercial companies that had had this type of activities in 2013. The general approach to the sample universe was the following: we decided that all spenders on advertising media in 2013 are relevant we also decided that these spenders also needed to be active in 2013 observing the criteria above from public and private sources we have compiled a list of companies DATA GATHERING The field approach was a complex challenging B2B process: many of the relevant participants were either reluctant or simply lacked the time to involve in the study a significant part of the refusals to participate were not explicit and were masked behind typical “business” excuses both of the above meant that a large part of the initial universe sample list required at least 7 contact points (mails or phones) until a resolution was achieved furthermore even in those conditions the initial response rate was very low, bellow 10% so personal interventions from the research company seniors were needed to boost that figure
DETAILED REPORTING ↘ In the following we present the key findings of the study. Reporting follows the questionnaire logic and structure and specifies for each graphic: the measured dimension the source question answer type total sample base used to compute percentages for that question measured percentages 6 www.ddresearch.ro
7 www.ddresearch.ro GP1. AREAS TO IMPROVE IN 2014 Which areas related to the client-agency [»] collaboration do you consider should be improved in 2014? Understanding of the clients' business 24,1 Meeting deadlines / fast / prompt reaction 18,0 Client service 15,0 Communication with the clients 15,0 Creative areas 13,5 Strategy areas 12,0 Costs / budgets 11,3 Knowledge on the client / brand / products 9,8 Proactivity 9,0 Measuring the results 7,5 Focus on efficiency 6,8 Implementing / Executing the ideas 5,3 Adaptability to the present 4,5 Others (< 3 options each) 27,8 DK/NA 15,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, open multiple answers
Areas mentioned under the “others” category: Same attention to smaller brands Higher involvement B2B Proper incorporation of the feedback BTL/ATL Trust BUSINESS FOCUS Innovation Quality of the provided data Professionalism Quality of the reports Project management DIGITAL Better desk research Diversification of the offer Respecting the briefs Propensity towards excellence Not repeating the same mistakes DTP Transparency in working procedures Cost transparency Seniors involved in regular activities 8 www.ddresearch.ro
9 www.ddresearch.ro GP2.1. TOP 3 MARCOM ACTIVITIES IN 2013 Which were the most important marketing and [»] communication activities conducted by your company in 2013? Creation 44,36 Strategy 30,08 Media - buying and planning 20,60 Digital 16,54 PR and Corporate communication 12,48 Social Media 10,98 Branding & Naming 9,62 B2B Marketing 6,77 Direct Marketing 6,47 Search Engine Marketing (SEO, CPC) 5,11 Shopper/Trade Marketing 4,06 Mobile marketing 1,35 Other 3,76 0,00 10,00 20,00 30,00 40,00 50,00 60,00 70,00 80,00 90,00 100,00 *N=133, spontaneous top 3 answers
GP2.2. ALL MARCOM ACTIVITIES IN 2013 Which of the following marketing and [»] communication activities were implemented by your company in 2013? Creation 80,5 Strategy 68,4 Digital 64,7 Social media 59,4 Media - buying and planning 54,9 PR and Corporate communication 50,4 Branding & Naming 39,1 Marketing direct 38,3 B2B Marketing 36,1 Search Engine Marketing (SEO, CPC) 34,6 Shopper/Trade Marketing 30,1 Mobile marketing 24,1 Other 9,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers 10 www.ddresearch.ro
11 www.ddresearch.ro A1.1. ATL AGENCIES AWARENESS – TOP OF MIND Which is the advertising agency that you can think of [»] at this moment? BV McCann Erickson 18,0 Leo Burnett & Target 15,0 Ogilvy 7,5 Saatchi & Saatchi 7,5 Publicis 6,8 DDB Bucuresti 6,8 Graffiti/BBDO 6,8 GMP Advertising 6,0 Lowe & Partners 3,0 CAP 3,0 JWT Cohn & Jansen 2,3 23 Communication Ideas 1,5 Tempo Advertising 1,5 Propaganda 0,8 Headvertising 0,8 Next Advertising 0,8 TBWA Bucuresti 0,8 Friends 0,0 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 0,0 Geometry Global 0,0 HAVAS Worldwide 0,0 Papaya Advertising 0,0 Other 11,3 0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 50,0 *N=133, spontaneous single answer
Agencies mentioned under the “other” category: DAESCU BORTUN OLTEANU LIGHT MEDIA DECORPORATE SENIOR INTERACTIV DRAFT FCB THE GEEKS ERKA PROMOTIONS THE GROUP FUNNY ADVERTISING THE PRACTICE GAVRILA SI ASOCIATII WOPA JAZZ COMMUNICATION WUNDERMAN 12 www.ddresearch.ro
13 www.ddresearch.ro A1.2. ATL AGENCIES ALL UNPROMPTED AWARENESS What other advertising agencies do you know or [»] heard of? BV McCann Erickson 58,6 Leo Burnett & Target 52,6 Graffiti/BBDO 37,6 Saatchi & Saatchi 36,1 GMP Advertising 32,3 Ogilvy 28,6 Publicis 27,1 Next Advertising 21,1 Propaganda 15,8 Lowe & Partners 15,0 DDB Bucuresti 13,5 Tempo Advertising 12,0 CAP 10,5 Headvertising 9,0 Friends 9,0 JWT Cohn & Jansen 9,0 Papaya Advertising 6,0 Geometry Global 6,0 TBWA Bucuresti 5,3 23 Communication Ideas 5,3 HAVAS Worldwide 4,5 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 1,5 Other 37,6 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, spontaneous multiple answers
Agencies mentioned under the “other” category: ADDV INITIATIVE MEDIA ADVANCE IDEAS INITIATIVES ADVENTURES MERCURY 360 ARSENOAIEI & MATASEL PASTEL BABEL COMMUNICATION PHD BAD CAT PRESAGE BLOOM COMMUNICATION REPUBLIKA BRAND FUSIONS ROGALSKY PR BRIDGE COMMUNICATION RUSU BOTUN CSR AGENCY SENIORHYPER DC COMMUNICATION SPOON DRAFT FCB THE GEEKS ECHIPA DE PR THE GROUP GAVRILA SI ASOCIATII THE PRACTICE GOLINHARRIS THE SECRET SERVICE HIPPOS WUNDERMAN ILEO ZENITH 14 www.ddresearch.ro
15 www.ddresearch.ro A1.3. ADVERTISING AGENCIES RECOGNITION Which of the following advertising agencies do you [»] know or heard of? *N=133, closed multiple answers
U1. EMPLOYED AGENCIES In 2013, with how many advertising agencies did [»] your company worked with? two 28,6 one 27,1 more than 3 24,1 three 20,3 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed single answer 16 www.ddresearch.ro
17 www.ddresearch.ro U2.1. IMPORTANT MARCOM ACTIVITIES IN 2013 Please chose from the following marketing and [»] communication activities, which were the most important in 2013 for your business? Creation 61,74 Strategy 55,56 Digital communication overall (Social Media, Mobile 40,41 Marketing, Search Engine Marketing etc.) Events/ Direct Marketing 29,66 PR and Corporate Communication 26,25 Shopper Marketing/Trade 15,95 Other 7,62 0,00 10,00 20,00 30,00 40,00 50,00 60,00 70,00 80,00 90,00 100,00 *N=133, closed ranking
U2.2. IMPORTANT MARCOM ACTIVITIES IN 2014 Please chose from the following marketing and [»] communication activities, which of them will be most important for your company’s business? Strategy 59,65 Creation 56,10 Digital communication overall (Social Media, Mobile 41,99 Marketing, Search Engine Marketing etc.) PR and Corporate Communication 28,78 Events/ Direct Marketing 27,60 Shopper Marketing/Trade 17,30 Other 7,10 0,00 10,00 20,00 30,00 40,00 50,00 60,00 70,00 80,00 90,00 100,00 *N=133, closed ranking 18 www.ddresearch.ro
19 www.ddresearch.ro U2.3. MARCOM BUDGET SHARE IN 2013 What was the share for every marketing and [»] communication activity conducted in 2013? Creation 19,94 Digital communication overall (Social Media, Mobile 18,00 Marketing, Search Engine Marketing etc.) Events/ Direct Marketing 17,75 Strategy 16,66 PR and Corporate Communication 10,58 Shopper Marketing/Trade 9,73 Other 7,34 0,00 10,00 20,00 30,00 40,00 50,00 60,00 70,00 80,00 90,00 100,00 *N=133, open percentage answers adding up to 100%
U3. ADVERTISING NEEDS Which of the following sentences describe best the [»] way your company prefers to cover its’ advertising needs? working with more than one advertising agencies 52,6 specialized in particular areas working with a single advertising agency 40,6 working with an external consultant/ freelancer 12,0 assigning for each brand different agencies 12,0 developing an in-house department 11,3 working with an agency from outside the country 6,0 DK/NA 3,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers 20 www.ddresearch.ro
21 www.ddresearch.ro U4. SPECIALIZED VS. FULL SERVICE In which of the following areas a specialized agency [»] will perform better than an advertising agency?? Digital communication overall (Social Media, Mobile 65,4 Marketing, Search Engine Marketing etc.) Media planning and buying 53,4 Events/ Direct Marketing 39,8 Strategy and Creation 38,3 Branding Consultancy 33,1 Shopper Marketing/Trade 32,3 Other 0,8 DK/NA 2,3 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
U5. EMPLOYED AGENCIES Please name the advertising agency your company [»] worked with in 2013 BV McCann Erickson 17,3 Leo Burnett & Target 16,5 Publicis 15,0 Graffiti/BBDO 11,3 DDB Bucuresti 10,5 Saatchi & Saatchi 10,5 GMP Advertising 9,8 Ogilvy 9,0 JWT Cohn & Jansen 8,3 Next Advertising 6,8 Lowe & Partners 6,0 Tempo Advertising 6,0 23 Communication Ideas 5,3 Propaganda 3,8 Friends 3,0 Geometry Global 3,0 TBWA Bucuresti 2,3 HAVAS Worldwide 1,5 Headvertising 1,5 CAP 1,5 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 1,5 Papaya Advertising 1,5 Other 54,1 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answer 22 www.ddresearch.ro
23 www.ddresearch.ro Agencies mentioned under the “other” category: ACTIVE PROMOTIONS GOLINHARRIS PROSPERO AD PRINT GRAYLING REPUBLIKA ADVANCE IDEAS GREY RUSU BORTUN ARSENOAIEI & MATASEL ILEO SENIORHYPER BRAND FUSION IMAGE PR SMART IDEA BUSINESS BRANDFEST INITIATIVES RESULTS BRANDIENT JAZZ SMART POINT KEIL AUSTRIA GMBH KALEIDOSCOPE SPOON DECORPORATE KINEKTO THE GEEKS DIGITAL STAR LIVADA THE GROUP DRAFT FCB LUNA THE PRACTICE ERKA MARKETING MATERS TOTAL BRANDING EYE PR MERCURY 360 WOPA FOSS ADVERTISING MSPS WUNDERMAN FUNNY ADVERTISING NAKED & JONES YOU FIRST GAVRILA SI ASOCIATII PR STEPS COMMUNICATION
PE1. MARCOM BUDGET In 2013, what was the budget for advertising and [»] communication activities? < 50.000 € 10,5 50.000-100.000 € 13,5 100.000-300.000 € 21,1 300.000-500.000 € 8,3 > 500.000 € 35,3 DK/NA 11,3 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed single answer 24 www.ddresearch.ro
25 www.ddresearch.ro PE2. MARCOM BUDGET EVOLUTION IN 2014 As compared with 2013, how do you assess the [»] advertising budget will evolve in 2014? Will increase 35,3 Will decrease 20,3 Don't know/can't apreciate 27,1 Will remain the same 17,3 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed single answer
PE2.1. MARCOM BUDGET ESTIMATED EVOLUTIONS Please give an estimated percentage of how much [»] you assess the advertising budget increase in 2014? Will Decrease Will Increase Less than 10% 14,8 25,5 Less than 10% Between 10% and 20% 48,1 23,4 Between 10% and 20% Between 20% and 30% 3,7 25,5 Between 20% and 30% Between 30% and 40% 2,1 Between 30% and 40% Between 40% and 50% Between 40% and 50% Between 50% and 18,5 14,9 Between 50% and 100% 100% 100% 4,3 100% *N=47 participants estimating answering “increase” at the previous question, closed single answer *N=27 participants estimating answering “decrease” at the previous question, closed single answer 26 www.ddresearch.ro
27 www.ddresearch.ro PE3. TYPES OF REMUNERATION Which of the following forms of remuneration for the [»] employed advertising agencies, were adopted by your company in 2013? A constant monthly fee/flat fee 51,1 A flat fee per project 39,1 A fee based on rate hour 26,3 Success fee 18,8 Percentage of all communication budget 9,8 Else 1,5 DK/NA 3,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
S1. MOST IMPORTANT SPECIALIZED SERVICES IN 2014 Which of the services provided to you by the [»] advertising agency you think will be most important / relevant for your company in 2014? Creative services 59,4 Strategy services 57,9 Digital 33,8 Media buying and planning 11,3 Social Media 9,0 PR 8,3 Special events 7,5 Integration of ideas / executions 6,0 Client service 4,5 Implementation 4,5 Branding 3,0 Trade marketing 3,0 Others (< 3 options each) 15,8 DK/NA 6,0 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, spontaneous open answers 28 www.ddresearch.ro
29 www.ddresearch.ro Most important services mentioned under the “others” category: Costs and budgets Direct marketing Shopper marketing Business acquisition Brand activation Outdoor consultancy Gameification Understanding the consumer Project coordination Meeting the deadlines
S2. AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT In which areas do you consider the advertising [»] agency your company worked with in 2013 should improve? Creation 29,3 Digital 18,8 Strategy 12,8 Client service 7,5 Costs and budgets 6,8 Meeting deadlines and reaction times 6,0 Involvement / Responsibility 6,0 Media - buying and planning 5,3 Knowledge of business and consumer 4,5 Events 3,8 Research 3,0 Shopper marketing 3,0 Others (< 3 options each) 17,3 DK/NA 21,1 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, spontaneous open answers 30 www.ddresearch.ro
31 www.ddresearch.ro Most important areas of improvement mentioned under the “others” category: Adaptability between online and offline B3B Marketing Consultancy DTP Production Work teams People skills PR Proactivity Transparency in assessments More involvement in smaller brands
L1.1. SATISFACTION WITH THE 2013 PERFORMANCE On a scale from 1 to 5, how satisfied are you with the [»] advertising agency you worked with in 2013? Publicis 76,56 BV McCann Erickson 75,00 Leo Burnett & Target 73,86 Ogilvy 72,73 DDB Bucuresti 71,43 Graffiti/BBDO 71,15 Saatchi & Saatchi 70,83 0,00 10,00 20,00 30,00 40,00 50,00 60,00 70,00 80,00 90,00 100,00 * the number of evaluations for each company are rather low ranging between 20 evaluations for Saatchi & Saatchi and 2 evaluations for McCann Erickson; five point Likert type scale: 1 less satisfied … 5 most satisfied 32 www.ddresearch.ro
33 www.ddresearch.ro L2. ADVERTISING AGENCY DECISION Which of the following sentences describes best the [»] way your company took the decision to work with an advertising agency? We continued the relationship with the agency we've 63,9 worked with in 2012 We organised auction / selection / pitch 33,1 The decision belonged in affiliation with 15,0 international network We took into account the recommendations from 9,0 business partners/friends We contacted an agency chosen based on previous 7,5 campaigns/successful case study de succes We were contacted directly by agencies who made 4,5 presentations 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
L3. TOP CRITERIA ASSESSMENT OF ADVERTISING AGENCIES Which of the following criteria are important when [»] assessing an advertising agency? Strategic skills/The ability to understand consumer behaviour 66,6 Creative skills 57,4 Prices that meets the market situation 11,9 Previous experience with the agency/Ease of collaboration 10,1 The ability to accomplish complex projects 9,6 Digital skills 6,1 Previous projects/campaigns of the agency 5,8 The presence in the agency of key people, appreciated by being digital … 5,5 Credentials 2,3 Prizes/Awards ceremony performance 0,9 High rank in specialized awards 0,8 Informations/recommendations for business partners/friends 0,8 Others 2,3 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed top 3 answers 34 www.ddresearch.ro
35 www.ddresearch.ro L4.1. TOP 3 STRENGTHS EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 strengths of the advertising [»] agency you worked with in 2013? BV McCann Erickson Creative competences 80,0 70,0 60,0 50,0 40,0 High proactivity / 30,0 Strategic competencies enthusiastic 20,0 10,0 0,0 Capacity to implement Good costs "cool" projects *N=7 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *strengths are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N
L4.2. TOP 3 STRENGTHS EMPLOYED ADVETISING AGENCY What are the top 3 strengths of the advertising [»] agency you worked with in 2013? DDB Bucuresti Creative competences 80,0 High know how / very Prompt / fast / meeting 70,0 knowledgeable deadlines 60,0 50,0 Capacity to implement 40,0 Strategic competencies "cool" projects 30,0 20,0 10,0 0,0 Good client service High flexibility Team of professionals Good costs High proactivity / Very experienced enthusiastic *N=12 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *strengths are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N 36 www.ddresearch.ro
37 www.ddresearch.ro L4.3. TOP 3 STRENGTHS EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 strengths of the advertising [»] agency you worked with in 2013? Graffiti/BBDO Creative competences 80,0 70,0 60,0 Knowledge on the client / 50,0 Strategic competencies brand / products 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 0,0 Prompt / fast / meeting Good client service deadlines High proactivity / High flexibility enthusiastic *N=8 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *strengths are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N
L4.4. TOP 3 STRENGTHS EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 strengths of the advertising [»] agency you worked with in 2013? Leo Burnett & Target Strategic competencies 80,0 Very experienced 70,0 Good client service 60,0 50,0 40,0 High proactivity / 30,0 Creative competences enthusiastic 20,0 10,0 0,0 Knowledge on the client / High flexibility brand / products Capacity to implement Prompt / fast / meeting "cool" projects deadlines Team of professionals *N=15 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *strengths are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N 38 www.ddresearch.ro
39 www.ddresearch.ro L4.5. TOP 3 STRENGTHS EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 strengths of the advertising [»] agency you worked with in 2013? Ogilvy Creative competences 80,0 70,0 Very experienced Good client service 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 Prompt / fast / meeting 20,0 Strategic competencies deadlines 10,0 0,0 Good costs High flexibility Capacity to implement High know how / very "cool" projects knowledgeable *N=8 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *strengths are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N
L4.6. TOP 3 STRENGTHS EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 strengths of the advertising [»] agency you worked with in 2013? Publicis Creative competences 80,0 70,0 Very experienced Strategic competencies 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 Knowledge on the client / 20,0 Capacity to implement brand / products 10,0 "cool" projects 0,0 Good costs Team of professionals Prompt / fast / meeting Good client service deadlines *N=12 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *strengths are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N 40 www.ddresearch.ro
41 www.ddresearch.ro L4.7. TOP 3 STRENGTHS EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 strengths of the advertising [»] agency you worked with in 2013? Saatchi & Saatchi Strategic competencies 80,0 Knowledge on the client / Very experienced 70,0 brand / products 60,0 50,0 Prompt / fast / meeting 40,0 Good client service deadlines 30,0 20,0 10,0 0,0 High proactivity / Creative competences enthusiastic Good costs High flexibility Capacity to implement Team of professionals "cool" projects *N=9 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *strengths are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N
L5.1. TOP 3 WEAKNESSES EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 weaknesses of the advertising [»] agency you worked the most in 2013? BV McCann Erickson Poor digital competences 80,0 70,0 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 Slow reaction times / failing Poor costs and budgets 0,0 some of the deadlines Poor proactivity *N=7 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *weaknesses are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N 42 www.ddresearch.ro
43 www.ddresearch.ro L5.2. TOP 3 WEAKNESSES EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 weaknesses of the advertising [»] agency you worked the most in 2013? DDB Bucuresti Poor creative competences 80,0 70,0 Team instability 60,0 Poor costs and budgets 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 Poor proactivity 0,0 Poor client service Poor knowledge on the Poor strategic competences client / brand / products Poor digital competences *N=12 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *weaknesses are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N
L5.3. TOP 3 WEAKNESSES EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 weaknesses of the advertising [»] agency you worked the most in 2013? Graffiti/BBDO Poor creative competences 80,0 70,0 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 Poor proactivity Poor digital competences 20,0 10,0 0,0 Slow reaction times / failing Poor costs and budgets some of the deadlines *N=8 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *weaknesses are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N 44 www.ddresearch.ro
45 www.ddresearch.ro L5.4. TOP 3 WEAKNESSES EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 weaknesses of the advertising [»] agency you worked the most in 2013? Leo Burnett & Target Poor costs and budgets 80,0 70,0 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 Team instability 0,0 Poor creative competences Poor digital competences *N=15 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *weaknesses are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N
L5.5. TOP 3 WEAKNESSES EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 weaknesses of the advertising [»] agency you worked the most in 2013? Ogilvy Poor creative competences 80,0 70,0 60,0 50,0 Poor knowledge on the 40,0 Poor costs and budgets client / brand / products 30,0 20,0 10,0 0,0 Slow reaction times / failing Poor client service some of the deadlines Poor digital competences *N=8 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *weaknesses are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N 46 www.ddresearch.ro
47 www.ddresearch.ro L5.6. TOP 3 WEAKNESSES EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 weaknesses of the advertising [»] agency you worked the most in 2013? Publicis Poor creative competences 80,0 70,0 Not enough resources for 60,0 Poor digital competences our needs 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 Poor knowledge on the 0,0 Poor costs and budgets client / brand / products Slow reaction times / failing Poor client service some of the deadlines Poor strategic competences *N=12 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *weaknesses are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N
L5.7. TOP 3 WEAKNESSES EMPLOYED ADVERTISING AGENCY What are the top 3 weaknesses of the advertising [»] agency you worked the most in 2013? Saatchi & Saatchi Poor creative competences 80,0 70,0 60,0 50,0 40,0 30,0 Poor proactivity Poor costs and budgets 20,0 10,0 0,0 Slow reaction times / failing Team instability some of the deadlines *N=9 participants that assessed the company, open top 3 answers *weaknesses are spontaneously mentioned; values are percentages out of N 48 www.ddresearch.ro
49 www.ddresearch.ro L6. INTENTION TO SWITCH THE ADVERTISING AGENCY In 2014 do you intent to change the advertising [»] agency you worked with in 2013? Certanly Yes 8,3 Yes, probably 13,5 No, probably 34,6 Certanly No 38,3 DK/NA 5,3 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed single answer
L7. TOP 3 REASONS TO END THE COLLABORATION What are the top 3 reasons if you were to end the [»] relationship with an advertising agency? Lack of creativity 34,5 Insufficient knowledge of consumer's behaviour/lack of quality… 34,5 Lack of excelence in craft 27,6 High prices/not in keeping with the market situation 27,6 Failure to comply with deadlines 17,2 Lack of skills needed to implement larger projects 17,2 Insufficient capacity to design integrated campaigns (cross media) 17,2 Unable to understand the digital media (internet, social media, … 13,8 International/Network decision 10,3 Client service incompatibility/We didn't had a good collaboration 6,9 Simplifying the work process in our company (all … 6,9 Unattractive credentials 3,4 Others 17,2 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=29, participants responding “yes” or “probably yes” to the previous question, open top 3 answers 50 www.ddresearch.ro
51 www.ddresearch.ro L8. STRONGEST PITCH REFERENCE COMPANIES In case of a new pitch, I would like to compare the [»] following advertising agencies BV McCann Erickson 33,8 Leo Burnett & Target 26,3 Graffiti/BBDO 18,0 GMP Advertising 14,3 Propaganda 14,3 Saatchi & Saatchi 12,8 Publicis 11,3 Next Advertising 8,3 CAP 7,5 Ogilvy 6,8 Lowe & Partners 5,3 23 Communication Ideas 4,5 Headvertising 4,5 DDB Bucuresti 3,8 Papaya Advertising 3,8 Friends 3,0 JWT Cohn & Jansen 3,0 Tempo Advertising 2,3 Others (< 3 options each) 16,5 DK/NA 16,5 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, open multiple answers
Agencies mentioned under the “others” category: ADMAKER BRAND FUSIONS BRANDS&BEARS DAESCU BORTUN OLTEANU FREE ADVERTISING GODMOTHER GOLINHARRIS ILEO JAZZ KOALA COMMUNICATION PERCEPTUM PR STEPS PRACTICE SPRINGER & JACOBY THE GEEKS THE GROUP THE MEDIA CONCEPT STORE THE PRACTICE WOPA 52 www.ddresearch.ro
53 www.ddresearch.ro L9. REASON WHY (PREVIOUS QUESTION) [»] Please briefly explain your choice High creativity 18,0 The had successful campaigns 17,3 Good previous experience 11,3 Well known agency / Good reputation 6,8 Just for benchmarking, to see other proposals 5,3 They are highly recommended 2,3 They are part of the global network 1,5 They are highly proactive 1,5 Others (< 2 options each) 9,8 DK/NA 26,3 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, open multiple answers
Reasons mentioned under the “others” category: Smaller agencies show me respect They have high strategic competences Good on BTL They have merged with a German agency that has creativity awards They work is visible to the public They have a good presentation They are generally very good they are full service They are local and understand local businesses 54 www.ddresearch.ro
55 www.ddresearch.ro AA1. ADVERTISING AWARDS To what extent the awards won by an advertising [»] agency at the dedicated festivals will influence your decision to pass them your business? Very little extent 26,3 Small extent 19,5 Not little, nor high 33,8 Great extent 18,8 Very great extent 0,8 DK/NA 0,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 * N=133, five point Likert type scale: 1 low influence … 5 high influence
AA2. MOST RELEVANT AWARDS From your point of view, which are the most relevant [»] awards when assessing an advertising agency? Effie 78,2 Cannes Lions 57,9 Golden Drum (Portoroz) 36,8 AdOr 25,6 AdPrint 8,3 Epica 3,8 Eurobest 2,3 Other 0,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers 56 www.ddresearch.ro
57 www.ddresearch.ro AG1. MOST CREATIVE ADVERTISING AGENCY In your opinion, which are the most creative [»] advertising agencies? BV McCann Erickson 39,8 Leo Burnett & Target 31,6 GMP Advertising 23,3 Graffiti/BBDO 15,0 Propaganda 17,3 23 Communication Ideas 17,3 CAP 15,0 Publicis 15,8 Papaya Advertising 13,5 Next Advertising 9,0 Ogilvy 9,0 Headvertising 9,0 Saatchi & Saatchi 7,5 Friends 6,0 DDB Bucuresti 5,3 Tempo Advertising 5,3 JWT Cohn & Jansen 3,8 Lowe & Partners 1,5 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 0,8 HAVAS Worldwide 0,8 Geometry Global 0,0 TBWA Bucuresti 0,0 Other 9,0 DK/NA 9,0 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
Agencies mentioned under the “other” category”: ARSENOAIEI & MATASEL BAD CAT BRANDS&BEARS CREATIVE DAESCU BORTUN OLTEANU ECHIPA DE PR GAVRILA SI ASOCIATII GOLIN HARRIS MEDIA CONCEPT STORE PROXIMITY THE GEEKS THE GROUP THE PRACTICE 58 www.ddresearch.ro
59 www.ddresearch.ro AG2. BEST STRATEGIC ADVERTISING AGENCY In your opinion, which are the best advertising [»] agencies when it comes to strategy? BV McCann Erickson 39,1 Leo Burnett & Target 38,3 Graffiti/BBDO 18,0 GMP Advertising 14,3 Saatchi & Saatchi 15,0 Publicis 14,3 Ogilvy 6,8 DDB Bucuresti 6,8 Propaganda 8,3 23 Communication Ideas 6,0 Next Advertising 4,5 CAP 3,0 Tempo Advertising 3,8 Lowe & Partners 3,0 JWT Cohn & Jansen 2,3 Papaya Advertising 1,5 Friends 0,8 Geometry Global 0,8 Headvertising 0,8 TBWA Bucuresti 0,8 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 0,0 HAVAS Worldwide 0,0 Other 12,0 DK/NA 9,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
Agencies mentioned under the “other” category”: ARSENOAIEI & MATASEL BRANDIENT BRIDGE COMUNICATION CREATIVE DRAFT FCB GAVRILA SI ASOCIATII GOLIN HARRIS MARKS MEDIA CONCEPT STORE OMD RUSU BORŢUN THE GEEKS THE GROUP 60 www.ddresearch.ro
61 www.ddresearch.ro AG3. BEST ADVERTISING AGENCY WITH DIGITAL SKILLS In your opinion, which advertising agencies have the [»] best digital skills? Leo Burnett & Target 34,6 BV McCann Erickson 28,6 Graffiti/BBDO 12,8 GMP Advertising 12,8 Publicis 8,3 Lowe & Partners 6,8 Propaganda 6,8 Ogilvy 6,0 DDB Bucuresti 6,0 Saatchi & Saatchi 6,0 Next Advertising 4,5 Tempo Advertising 3,0 JWT Cohn & Jansen 2,3 23 Communication Ideas 1,5 Friends 1,5 TBWA Bucuresti 1,5 CAP 0,8 HAVAS Worldwide 0,8 Papaya Advertising 0,8 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 0,0 Geometry Global 0,0 Headvertising 0,0 Other 12,0 DK/NA 18,0 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
Agencies mentioned under the “other” category”: BUSINESS RESULTS CREATIVE CREATIVE LUGGAGE DIGITAL STAR GOLINHARRIS KONDIMENT KUBIS MSPS PROXIMITY REPUBLIKA RUSU BORŢUN SMART IDEA SUPER PUNK (MEDIACAFE) THE GEEKS THINK DIGITAL WEBSTYLER 62 www.ddresearch.ro
63 www.ddresearch.ro AG4. BEST ADVERITISNG AGENCY AT SOCIAL MEDIA In your opinion, which are the best advertising [»] agencies at social media? Leo Burnett & Target 29,3 BV McCann Erickson 24,8 Graffiti/BBDO 8,3 Publicis 10,5 GMP Advertising 9,0 Ogilvy 4,5 Tempo Advertising 5,3 Propaganda 4,5 Saatchi & Saatchi 4,5 Next Advertising 4,5 Lowe & Partners 3,8 CAP 3,0 DDB Bucuresti 3,8 Friends 3,0 23 Communication Ideas 1,5 JWT Cohn & Jansen 1,5 Papaya Advertising 0,8 Geometry Global 0,0 HAVAS Worldwide 0,8 TBWA Bucuresti 0,8 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 0,0 Headvertising 0,0 Other 13,5 DK/NA 22,6 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
Agencies mentioned under the “other” category”: CREATIVE CREATIVE LUGGAGE ECHIPA DE PR ERKA GOLINHARRIS INTERACTIONS KUBIS MEDIA INVERSTMENT MSPS PROXIMITY REPUBLIKA THE GEEKS THE PRACTICE THE SECRET SERVICE THINK DIGITAL WEBSTYLER ZENITH 64 www.ddresearch.ro
65 www.ddresearch.ro AG5. BEST CS/PM ADVERTISING AGENCY In your opinion, which are the best advertising [»] agencies in client service / project management? BV McCann Erickson 29,3 Leo Burnett & Target 26,3 Graffiti/BBDO 18,8 Publicis 18,0 GMP Advertising 12,8 Saatchi & Saatchi 12,8 Ogilvy 12,0 DDB Bucuresti 9,8 Propaganda 6,8 Lowe & Partners 5,3 Next Advertising 5,3 23 Communication Ideas 4,5 Tempo Advertising 3,8 CAP 3,0 Friends 3,0 JWT Cohn & Jansen 2,3 TBWA Bucuresti 2,3 Papaya Advertising 2,3 Headvertising 1,5 HAVAS Worldwide 0,8 Geometry Global 0,0 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 0,0 Other 11,3 DK/NA 10,5 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
Agencies mentioned under the “other” category”: BAD CAT BUSINESS RESULTS CREATIVE THE CSR AGENCY DAESCU BORTUN OLTEANU DRAFT FCB ERKA GOLINHARRIS JAZZ PROSPERO RUSU BORŢUN SMART IDEA THE GEEKS THE GROUP THE PRACTICE THE SECRET SERVICE THINK DIGITAL 66 www.ddresearch.ro
67 www.ddresearch.ro AG6. BEST EXCELLENCE IN CRAFT ADVERTISING AGENCY In your opinion, which are the best advertising [»] agencies when it comes to excellence in craft? BV McCann Erickson 37,6 Leo Burnett & Target 24,1 Graffiti/BBDO 15,0 GMP Advertising 12,8 Publicis 14,3 Saatchi & Saatchi 11,3 Next Advertising 6,8 CAP 6,8 Propaganda 6,8 23 Communication Ideas 4,5 Ogilvy 6,0 DDB Bucuresti 4,5 JWT Cohn & Jansen 3,8 Lowe & Partners 3,0 Papaya Advertising 3,8 Tempo Advertising 3,8 Friends 1,5 Headvertising 1,5 TBWA Bucuresti 1,5 Geometry Global 0,8 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 0,0 HAVAS Worldwide 0,0 Other 6,8 DK/NA 18,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
Agencies mentioned under the “other” category”: BAD CAT CREATIVE GAVRILA SI ASOCIATII MARKS PROSPERO SMART IDEA THE GEEKS THE GROUP THE PRACTICE WAVE 68 www.ddresearch.ro
69 www.ddresearch.ro AG7. BEST ADVERTISING AGENCY AT B2B MARKETING In your opinion, which are the best advertising [»] agencies in b2b marketing? BV McCann Erickson 11,3 Leo Burnett & Target 11,3 Graffiti/BBDO 6,0 Publicis 6,8 Lowe & Partners 3,8 Saatchi & Saatchi 4,5 GMP Advertising 5,3 Ogilvy 3,0 CAP 2,3 DDB Bucuresti 2,3 JWT Cohn & Jansen 2,3 Propaganda 1,5 Tempo Advertising 2,3 23 Communication Ideas 1,5 Friends 1,5 Next Advertising 0,8 Geometry Global 0,0 HAVAS Worldwide 0,8 Headvertising 0,8 Papaya Advertising 0,8 Generic Audiovizual (GAV) 0,0 TBWA Bucuresti 0,0 Other 5,3 DK/NA 51,9 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed multiple answers
Agencies mentioned under the “other” category”: CREATIVE CSR AGENCY DAESCU BORTUN OLTEANU DRAFT FCB MARKS MORE THAN PUB THE GROUP 70 www.ddresearch.ro
71 www.ddresearch.ro AG8. MOST LIKED 2013 ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN Which was your favorite advertising campaign (local [»] or international) aired in Romania in 2013? GANDUL.INFO - Why don't you come over? 14,3 VODAFONE - Ghita the shepherd 9,8 ROM - Bucharest not Budapest 7,5 COCA COLA - Share a coke with 3,0 COSMOTE - Butterfly 2,3 HEINEKEN - The voyage 2,3 ING - Bottomless toy bag 2,3 VODAFONE - Romanian's have initiative 2,3 ROM Authentic 2,3 COVALACT - Too good, too country side 1,5 DEDEMAN - Using lyrics as a way to promote products 1,5 DORNA 1,5 DOVE - Real beauty 1,5 HEINEKEN - 007 1,5 ORANGE - Extended enjoyable moments 1,5 LIDL 1,5 Others (1 options each) 27,1 DK/NA 16,5 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, open single answer
Other campaigns mentioned: HEMOROEASY HUMANITAS - Blind date with a book AVON - Celebrity endorsement campaign with ORBIT - Antonio Banderas Antonia PEGAS - Nation's internet AXA - Education campaign PEPSI - Summer fun AXE - Fallen angels PETROM - Andrei's country BANCA TRANSILVANIA - The male fairy SPRITE - National promotion DERO'S CAMPAIGN REDBULL - Felix CIF - Campaign for a clean city RENAULT - Clio CIUC - Another way to make things ROŞIA MONTANĂ COCA COLA - Reasons of friendship SAMSUNG - Brand release COCA-COLA - Christmas balloons SAVE THE CHILDREN - One Republic song COCA-COLA - Open and enjoy happiness SELGROS - It's Worth It MILKA - Tender EVIAN - Baby COSMOTE - Prepay JACOBS - Tasimo COSMOTE - Christmas campaign with smiley URSUS - New box release DIGI 24 - Regionalization VODAFONE - The kiss FARMEC, NUFARUL & TRIUMF VODAFONE Relaunch GROLSCH - Experience hotel WORLD VISION - Future donors HEINEKEN ODYSSEY FILM 72 www.ddresearch.ro
73 www.ddresearch.ro AG9. REASON WHY (PREVIOUS QUESTION) Please explain the reasons that led you to chose this [»] campaign Very creative 15,8 Very memorable 6,8 Very amusing 6,0 It went viral 6,0 High impact 5,3 Emotionally charged campaign 4,5 Novelty 3,8 Excellence in craft 3,8 Very original 3,8 Raised awareness 3,0 Good strategic thinking 3,0 Integrated campaign with best use of digital 3,0 High visibility 3,0 Others (< 2 options each) 88,0 DK/NA 18,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, open multiple answers
Other reasons mentioned: Relevant target reach It reached a new, unexplored target Very inspired Structured campaign on 2 distinct parts It was linked to the reality we are faced with, Humanitarian campaign and proposed solution to it Ability to generate word of mouth It was different and spectacular Very clear It came with an answer to a real issue Consistency in communication Very spontaneous Soundtrack Act of bravery Very competitive High engagement The entire communication Related to everyday life Center positioning the consumer Very attractive Premature infants Multiple communication media (various area Very courageous distribution) Good adjustment for all types of media They were aggressive without bothering Good brand differentiator They stayed in the visual memory Direct Romanian authenticity Optimal timing duration Indicated very good benefit Very efficient Good brand fit idea Relevant 360* executions Well targeted Good media coverage Strong brand Outstanding campaign made by bbh Low budget Catchy 74 www.ddresearch.ro
75 www.ddresearch.ro Freshness idea Unconventional Degree of variability It doesn't bother the consumer with the product Good idea supported by the results Award-winning Reaching out of the industry specific territory Unveils a set of natural reactions Interesting image, the persons matches the First brand used as money brand Magnetism Brand image brings happiness Very proactive Good implementation Consumer powerful reactions Product innovation Well know reality Innovative The reality of the story Powerful insight Celebrity endorsement CSR and brand integration Global target relevance Star's participation It was made in a relatively short time Online-offline integration Interesting change in communication Understanding consumer behavior Services vs. Product Direct user interaction The simplicity of the idea Very interactive Good tagline Powerful message They are present all the time I was able to recall old Romanian brands Very insightful Good weekly strategy, consistency and structured information
PP1.1. PEOPLE RECOGNITION Which of the following people working at this moment in advertising agencies [»] from Romania, do you know or have you heard of? Lorand Balint (Boti) 44,4 Mihai Gongu 42,9 Alex Badila 36,8 Stefan Chiritescu 33,1 Carmen Tiderle 30,8 Ema Prisca 27,1 Victor Stroe 27,1 Alexandru Dumitrescu (Tugu) 26,3 Andreea Nemens 24,8 Claudiu Dobrita 24,1 Catalin Dobre 23,3 Dan Şendroiu 21,1 Diana Ceausu 20,3 Mihnea Gheorghiu 20,3 Vali Suciu 20,3 Sebastian Olar 19,5 Ioana Gheorghita 18,8 Andrei Tripsa 17,3 Irina Becher 16,5 Titus Dumitrescu 16,5 Costin Milu 15,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed single answer 76 www.ddresearch.ro
77 www.ddresearch.ro PP1.2. PROFESSIONAL SCALE On a scale from 1 to 5, to which extent do you agree with the following sentence: [»] “He/she is a good professional” Titus Dumitrescu 89,1 Lorand Balint (Boti) 86,1 Alexandru Dumitrescu (Tugu) 83,6 Mihai Gongu 83,2 Victor Stroe 82,8 Irina Becher 82,4 Sebastian Olar 81,8 Ioana Gheorghita 81,0 Diana Ceausu 80,7 Andreea Nemens 80,6 Catalin Dobre 80,0 Dan Şendroiu 78,3 Ema Prisca 78,1 Costin Milu 76,5 Andrei Tripsa 75,0 Mihnea Gheorghiu 75,0 Stefan Chiritescu 73,1 Vali Suciu 73,0 Carmen Tiderle 69,6 Claudiu Dobrita 68,5 Alex Badila 65,5 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, five point Likert type scale: 1 strongly disagree … 5 totally agree
PP1.3. “DESIRABILITY” SCALE On a scale from 1 to 5, to which extent do you agree with the following sentence: [»] “He/she is a person I would like to work with” Mihai Gongu 82,1 Sebastian Olar 81,9 Titus Dumitrescu 80,6 Lorand Balint (Boti) 80,4 Victor Stroe 79,0 Alexandru Dumitrescu (Tugu) 77,8 Costin Milu 75,0 Irina Becher 75,0 Dan Şendroiu 72,4 Andreea Nemens 71,6 Catalin Dobre 71,6 Andrei Tripsa 70,0 Diana Ceausu 68,1 Claudiu Dobrita 67,9 Ioana Gheorghita 67,1 Stefan Chiritescu 66,1 Ema Prisca 65,2 Mihnea Gheorghiu 62,5 Vali Suciu 62,5 Carmen Tiderle 60,8 Alex Badila 56,1 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, five point Likert type scale: 1 strongly disagree … 5 totally agree 78 www.ddresearch.ro
79 www.ddresearch.ro ID1.PROVENIENCE OF SPENDING COMPANY [»] Romanian/multinational company Romanian 26,3 Multinational 73,7 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed single answer
ID2.TURNOVER [»] Company’s financial turnover 500.000 – 1.000.000 EUR 3,8 1.000.001 – 5.000.000 EUR 13,5 5.000.001 – 10.000.000 EUR 3,8 10.000.001 – 50.000.000 EUR 27,8 >50.000.000 EUR 46,6 DK/NA 4,5 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed single answer 80 www.ddresearch.ro
81 www.ddresearch.ro ID3. TOTAL ADVERTISING SPENDING [»] Budget for the entire communication activities 10.000.000 EUR 13,5 DK/NA 6,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed single answer
ID4.NUMBER OF ACTIVE BRANDS IN ROMANIA [»] Estimated active brands in Romania 1 35,3 2-3 20,3 4-10 28,6 >11 15,8 0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 *N=133, closed single answer 82 www.ddresearch.ro
83 www.ddresearch.ro ID5.DOMAIN OF ACTIVITY [»] Company’s area of activity Alchoolic 6,0 Non-alchoolic 5,3 Beauty 1,5 Home appliances/electronics 3,8 Healthcare/medical 4,5 Travel/tourism 3,0 Media 5,3 Retail 10,5 Telecom/Internet 6,8 Automotive/vehicles 10,5 Financial/insurance 13,5 Fashion&style 2,3 Energy 1,5 Non-commercial/NGO 2,3 FMCG 13,5 Chemicals 0,8 Events 0,8 Heavy industry 1,5 Construction materials 0,8 Radio 0,8 Recicling 0,8 Logistics 0,8 Publishing 0,8 Tobacco 0,8 Educational 0,8 Distribution 0,8 Security 0,8 0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 35,0 40,0 45,0 50,0 *N=133, closed single answer
Thank you! For more information, boos or huzzas please contact: dan.petre@ddresearch.ro vlad.tureanu@ddresearch.ro © D&D Research 2014 84 www.ddresearch.ro
You can also read