Active ownership of passive Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)

Page created by Seth Walsh
 
CONTINUE READING
Active ownership of passive Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)
Active ownership of passive Exchange
Traded Funds (ETFs)
Table of contents

Foreword                                               2
Active ownership – engagement                          3
Active ownership – collaborative engagement            6
Active ownership - voting                              7
Active ownership – public policy and advocacy          9
Active ownership for our HSBC ETFs – looking forward   10
Important information                                  11

                                                1
Foreword

At HSBC, we are active stewards for our ETF clients
ETFs are an efficient way to invest in a range of markets without having to spend time choosing individual stocks.
These funds aim to replicate the investment returns and characteristics of an index. Managers of passive ETFs do not
have discretion to reduce exposure to, or divest from, the companies in the relevant index.
Precisely because they cannot sell the companies in an index, ETF investors are the ultimate long-term owners. How
well companies manage the environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues that impact company returns over
time therefore is of crucial importance to ETF investors. In the same manner ETF managers who undertake detailed
stewardship of the companies in their funds are working to protect and enhance the returns of their ETF investors.
That’s why at HSBC we are passionate about the stewardship of our ETF assets.

We are large, long-term owners with the scale, reach and depth of knowledge to be effective in exercising our
fiduciary duties to engage with the companies we hold on behalf of our clients.

Our ETFs are part of our global asset management business, with over USD74bn 1 of assets under management in our
passive and systematic equity strategies.
Our active ownership, aiming to support and encourage companies to follow principles of good governance, and
environmental sustainability, means we can positively impact the long-term value of our client’s investments.

Effective stewardship is widely regarded as a driver of enhanced operational and financial performance. It helps to
reduce risks and maximise returns at the individual investment level, as well as enhance overall market stability and
deliver positive impacts for society and the environment more generally.2

At HSBC, we are able to use our significant influence as investors to encourage corporate behaviour that enhances
value, through company engagement, proxy voting, and as signatories to investor stewardship codes as the
Principles for Responsible Investment, the UK Stewardship Code and the Hong Kong Principles of Responsible
Ownership.

This paper provides a brief summary of our proactive engagement, voting, public policy and advocacy activity as
active stewards for our passive ETFs, and gives an insight into how we leverage our extensive experience and depth
of resources in these areas for the benefit of our ETF clients.

1
    Source: HSBC Asset Management, as at end December 2020
2
    Source: ShareAction ‘Point of no Returns’ report, March 2020

                                                                   2
Active ownership – engagement

At HSBC, we prefer to engage with companies to inspire change rather than exclude them, whilst for many of our
ETFs exclusion is not an option for funds which hold shares in all the companies in their index. Our stewardship has
been recognised as market leading, with A+ ratings from the global Principles for Responsible Investment and a Tier 1
ranking under the UK Stewardship Code3.

We engage with fund constituent companies to improve company practices, across a range of environmental, social
and governance issues, as shown below:

Themes discussed during company engagements4
     70

     60

     50

     40

     30

     20

     10

       0
                                                                            Column1
            Stra tegic Capital Usage (62%)                      Corporate Governance (51%)                   Corporate Behavious (36%)

            Labour Sourcing Safety (21%)                        Climate Change (21%)                         Product Liability Safety (14%)

            Renewables Clean Tech (13%)                         Pollution Waste (11%)                        Wa ter Natural Resources (8%)

Given the typically diverse make up of passive portfolios, smaller players may lack the depth of research resources
and depth of knowledge needed to engage constructively with constituent companies, but we engage across equity
and fixed income holdings globally, leveraging our extensive research capabilities across both asset classes.

In 2020, we carried out 2,300+ issuer engagements globally. Through our engagement with companies held within
our ETFs, we aim to convey investor concerns and look for these to be addressed, recognising that sometimes a
number of engagements is required for change to be brought about. We prioritise engagements based on our
holding, issue and exposure, not necessarily whether we expect change, although we can demonstrate positive
outcomes in many instances.
More details of HSBC’s engagement activities can be found in our annual Responsible Investment Review, which
provides investors with key information about our active ownership undertakings and illustrates the importance we
place on stewardship.

3
    Source: Annual PRI (Principles for Responsible Investment) assessment, 2020; UK Stewardship Code, 2016
4
    Source: HSBC Asset Management, as at 31 December 2020

                                                                                 3
Examples of our engagement include:

Tesco – constituent of the HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF and HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
Issue                                  Engagement                             Change

We conducted a thematic                First we wrote to the company and      We were encouraged that the Tesco
engagement project into post-          outlined our research, views, and      team agreed with our assessment of
consumer packaging waste risks         questions. Tesco offered us a          the risks and opportunities presented
faced by consumer staples              written response as well as a formal   by post-consumer waste, and are
companies. Our research suggested      engagement meeting with one of         implicitly focused on absolute waste
Tesco was highly exposed to the        their managers for packaging           reduction.
risks of packaging waste but was       reduction.
                                                                              In early 2021, the company announced
also a leader in managing the issue.
                                       We learned about Tesco’s plans for     it had removed 1bn pieces of plastic
However, we felt there were a
                                       refillable packaging, reverse          from its packaging in the past year.
number of aspects of their
                                       vending, and setting appropriate       We hope to see the company expand
packaging waste practices and
                                       waste reduction targets. We            the target and give investors more
policies that we wanted to
                                       encouraged the company to make         granular detail on the absolute
understand better and influence.
                                       absolute waste reduction by weight     packaging weight reduced.
                                       explicit in its goal setting.
                                                                              We are considering how we can
                                                                              support this work further via our
                                                                              engagement, voting and advocacy.

Samsung Electronics – constituent of the HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF

Issue                                  Engagement                             Change

We had concerns regarding              We have met with the company           We were already engaging with the
Samsung’s approach to working          regularly over a number of years to    company when the Chair and several
conditions, health and safety          raise our concerns and seek            other Executives of the company were
standards and related disclosure.      company commitments that they          sentenced to time in prison for
                                       will be addressed.                     undermining labour union activities in
There have been serious allegations
                                                                              South Korea.
of human rights and labour rights
violations including health and                                               We will continue to engage with the
safety practices linked to worker                                             company on labour standards,
deaths, poor wages, unpaid                                                    including Freedom of Association
overtime, obligatory overtime and                                             across all geographies where they
extended work hours, no time off                                              operate.
work, exploitation, intimidation and
union busting at the company’s
factories.

                                                          4
Facebook, Alphabet and Twitter – constituents of the HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF and HSBC
MSCI World UCITS ETF
Issue                                                    Engagement                                                 Change

Engaging with the social media                           Following the transmission of the                          We were signatory to letters raising
companies on the issue of live-                          violent attacks in New Zealand, we                         our concerns to the companies.
streaming and distribution of                            joined a collective engagement                             Subsequent meetings with Facebook
content that promotes or supports –                      initiative with Facebook, Alphabet                         and Twitter have provided greater
or tends to promote or support –                         and Twitter to encourage the                               clarity on the different company
acts of torture, terrorism or the                        companies to establish robust                              approaches, although it is not clear
infliction of extreme violence or                        policies and procedures to manage                          whether changes implemented are
extreme cruelty.                                         these risks.                                               proportional to the scale of the issue
                                                                                                                    and risk.
                                                         This engagement is led by NZ
                                                         SuperFund.                                                 Alphabet have improved disclosure of
                                                                                                                    their controls over content, although
                                                                                                                    do not engage in open dialogue on
                                                                                                                    ESG issues.

Source: HSBC Asset Management, 2021.
For illustrative purposes only and does not constitute any investment recommendation in the above mentioned companies.
This example is historic and contains information that is not current and should not be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe
to any investment, and does not constitute any investment recommendation in the above mentioned companies. The views expressed were held at the time of
preparation and are subject to change without notice. Any forecast, projection or target when provided is indicative only and is not guaranteed in anyway.

                                                                                      5
Active ownership – collaborative engagement

We actively engage in investor-led collaborative engagement initiatives. These may form part of a broad initiative to
address systemic issues or may reflect an escalation of company-specific concerns shared by investors.
Collective engagement helps companies by allowing a focused dialogue with a number of investors on issues of
concern. Collective effort can be more efficient and lead to better results, because companies get a chance to hear
the same view from more than one investor. At the same time, it allows investors, whether in passive or active
strategies, to share resources and insight, allowing them to engage more effectively with each company they
approach.

As our ETF clients would expect, we are fully transparent in our reporting of our engagement and voting activity,
publishing our voting on a quarterly basis and summary information about our engagement activity annually.

An example of where HSBC has helped to lead collaborative engagement is Climate Action 100+, the largest ever
global collaborative investor engagement initiative, seeking alignment with the Paris Agreement. There are over 540
investor signatories under the initiative with USD52 trillion in AUM5 – this scale provides us significant ability to
influence companies on the critical issue of climate change, on behalf of our clients in both our active and passive
investment strategies.
Shareholder resolutions have been used under the Climate Action 100+ initiative as a means of promoting better
management of climate risks. As at March 2021, we have participated in 11 collaborative engagements led through
Climate Action 100+.

These include our work in 2020 leading engagement as part of Climate Action 100+ with BHP Group 6, a global
resource mining company and constituent of the HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF:

    Issue

    BHP is one of the world’s largest producers of iron ore, mining a range of other minerals, including metallurgical
    and thermal coal, as well as maintaining oil & gas production. The company had been a leader in its sector in
    addressing the challenges of carbon transition but needed to make new commitments to meet rising investor
    expectations.

    Action Taken
    We are the European lead investor with the company and met the company more than a dozen times over the
    course of the year, providing feedback on various aspects of its climate strategy, as well as co-ordinating support
    investors and engaging with other listed members of the controversial Minerals Council of Australia lobby group.

    Outcome

    The company added to its existing net zero operational emissions commitment with a 2030 target to reduce
    operational emissions by 30%, announced work to explore reductions in scope 3 emissions in its use of shipping
    and in steel production, strengthened the link between executive remuneration and the climate plan and improved
    its analysis of the impact of a 1.5-degree scenario on its portfolio. It also committed to sell its thermal coal
    business.

5
 Source: www.climateaction100.org, as at January 2021
6
 Source: HSBC Asset Management. For illustrative purposes only and does not constitute any investment recommendation in the above mentioned companies.
This example is historic and contains information that is not current and should not be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe
to any investment, and does not constitute any investment recommendation in the above mentioned companies. The views expressed were held at the time of
preparation and are subject to change without notice. Any forecast, projection or target when provided is indicative only and is not guaranteed in anyway.

                                                                                      6
Active ownership - voting

Exercising voting rights is an important expression of our stewardship and broader responsible investment approach,
and we vote on all equities held within our ETFs except in very few cases where the process of cost undermines
investor interests.
Our global voting guidelines aim to protect investor interests, foster good practice and enhance long term value. We
expect companies to apply governance good practice for their market of listing and, for larger companies, to meet
globally-recognised good practice standards.
In 2020, we voted on over 82,500 resolutions at around 8,000 company meetings across 70 markets, representing
96% of the ballots which we were entitled to vote. We supported management on 90% of resolutions, abstaining or
voting against on 10%.

The issue we most frequently opposed was director re-election (30% of votes against management) predominantly for
reasons of lack of independence, followed by executive pay – either because it was too high or not linked to
performance (25%), and capitalisation issues (21%). We voted against at least one resolution at 43% of all company
meetings:

                                                     Director elections 30%
                                                     Compensation 25%
                                                     Capitalisation 21%
              Votes against
                                                     Transactions 8%
              management
                                                     Shareholder resolutions - 8%
                                                     Routine 6%
                                                     Anti-takeover 1%

Our votes differed from the proxy voting standard policy recommendation on more than 7,000 resolutions (8%). More
than half of our votes on these resolutions were against management, with capitalisation and director elections in
China, and executive pay in the US the main areas where we had voted against management more often.
Shareholder dissent has been shown to be an important precursor to leadership and governance changes in firms7,
and in 2020, we engaged with 310 companies to discuss our voting decisions on resolutions where we felt unable to
support management. These companies were prioritised based on our largest holdings and markets and represented
circa 38% of our total HSBC ETF assets under management8.
One key area of voting-related engagement focus for us is board composition. The conduct and composition of a
company’s board are important to a company’s performance, and independent representation on boards is an
important element in advancing the interests of all shareholders. We have focused in particular on Japan, one market
which has some of the lowest levels of independent board representation seen in developed markets.

7
    Source: Proxy Advisors and Shareholder Dissent: A Cross-Country Comparative Study, Sauerwald, et al., Journal of Management, 2016
8
    Source: HSBC Asset Management, as at 31 December, 2020

                                                                                  7
Issue

    Many Japanese companies have very few independent directors. The market requirement is for only two outside
    directors who need not be independent. We believe that larger companies with international investors can be held
    to a higher standard and seek at least one-third board independence.

    Action Taken
    We write every year to companies in the local TOPIX100 index with independent directors making up fewer than
    one-third of their board, asking them to indicate if they will improve their balance. We escalated this issue two
    years ago for companies which still did not meet the one third standard by voting against all non-independent
    directors, other than the CEO and Founder/President.

    Outcome

    There has been a steady increase in the number of companies meeting the one-third independence standard. Out
    of 71 companies we have written to since 2017, 27 now have at least one-third independent directors on the board.

Our engagement with Japanese companies on this issue is ongoing and we hope to see increased levels of
independent representation on boards, accompanied by increased transparency around the nomination process for
directors.

This should be of benefit to our clients invested in the HSBC MSCI Japan UCITS ETF, which aims to track as closely
as possible the returns of the MSCI Japan Index, made up of large and mid-sized Japanese listed companies. Some of
the companies that we engage with on this issue are found in the top five weighted constituents of the index 9 -
Toyota Motor Corp, SoftBank Group Corp and Keyence Corp. These Japanese companies are also significant in
developed world funds, such as the HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF.

9
    Source: MSCI, as at 31 December 2020

                                                             8
Active ownership – public policy and advocacy

We meet with regulators and policymakers, both indirectly and through industry networks, to advocate for
progressive public policy action on a range of themes which help safeguard our ETF investors’ long-term interests.
One such theme is improving market standards and transparency on sustainability; we recognise that standards and
transparency are central to providing the appropriate information for us as investors, as well as for our clients.
Companies that measure their ESG impacts are more likely to manage them; those that publish the data can be held
to account.

HKEX – listing requirements

 Response to public consultation                                                  Outcome
 We responded to the public consultation on the ESG reporting guide and           This contributed to HKEX’s revision
 related listing rules by the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited            of ESG requirements for Hong Kong
 (HKEX), where we expressed support for enhanced disclosures of board             listed companies, where most of the
 responsibilities over material ESG issues, and their assessment and              proposals were adopted, effective
 management of climate-related issues, amongst others.                            for financial years commencing 1
                                                                                  July 2020.

SEC – shareholder proposals rules & proxy voting regulations

 Collective investor letter                                                       Outcome

 The proposals put forward by the SEC to amend shareholder proposals rules        Although the changes were largely
 and the regulations governing proxy voting advice, prompted us to sign a         adopted, the strength of shareholder
 collective investor letter, co-ordinated through the PRI, raising our concerns   opposition may incentivise the new
 that the changes may compromise shareholder rights in the US and                 US administration to amend them.
 cautioning that these changes were likely to cause unintended
 consequences that could harm the governance of issuers and ultimately the
 value of investments.

                                                           9
Active ownership for our HSBC ETFs – looking forward

Our established active ownership approach including voting, engagement, public policy and advocacy drives positive
behaviour, promotes high standards and ensures the interests of all stakeholders are considered. We use our
influence as global, large investors, to try to enhance the companies in which our ETFs invest.
HSBC’s ETF solutions are built on our strong index tracking heritage, with over 30 years’ experience managing
passive equity portfolios. Active ownership is central to our philosophy, beliefs and processes and as such is an
important part of how we maximise long-term value for our ETF clients.
Looking ahead, we recognise the responsibility we have towards continuing to improve market standards and drive
positive corporate practices, including in the areas of board composition and executive remuneration. Our
engagements will also continue to focus particularly on supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy – reducing
the role of coal and other fossil fuels – as well as protecting biodiversity.

Consideration of these important stewardship issues while investing efficiently through our established and
disciplined processes is critical to delivering sustainable value for our ETF clients.

                                                          10
Important information

Key risks
The value of an investment in the portfolios and any income from them can go down as well as up and as with any
investment you may not receive back the amount originally invested.
 Concentration risk: The Fund may be concentrated in a limited number of securities, economic sectors and/or
  countries. As a result, it may be more volatile and have a greater risk of loss than more broadly diversified funds
 Counterparty risk: The possibility that the counterparty to a transaction may be unwilling or unable to meet its
  obligations
 Derivatives risk: Derivatives can behave unexpectedly. The pricing and volatility of many derivatives may diverge
  from strictly reflecting the pricing or volatility of their underlying reference(s), instrument or asset
 Emerging Markets risk: Emerging markets are less established, and often more volatile, than developed markets
  and involve higher risks, particularly market, liquidity and currency risks
 Exchange rate risk: Changes in currency exchange rates could reduce or increase investment gains or investment
  losses, in some cases significantly
 Index tracking risk: To the extent that the Fund seeks to replicate index performance by holding individual
  securities, there is no guarantee that its composition or performance will exactly match that of the target index at any
  given time (“tracking error”)
 Investment leverage risk: Investment Leverage occurs when the economic exposure is greater than the amount
  invested, such as when derivatives are used. A Fund that employs leverage may experience greater gains and/or
  losses due to the amplification effect from a movement in the price of the reference source
 Liquidity risk: Liquidity Risk is the risk that a Fund may encounter difficulties meeting its obligations in respect of
  financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or other financial assets, thereby compromising existing or
  remaining investors
 Operational risk: Operational risks may subject the Fund to errors affecting transactions, valuation, accounting, and
  financial reporting, among other things

For Professional Clients only and should not be distributed to or relied upon by Retail Clients.

The material contained herein is for information only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice or a
recommendation to any reader of this material to buy or sell investments. You must not, therefore, rely on the content of
this document when making any investment decisions. This document is not intended for distribution to or use by any
person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. This
document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe to
any investment. Any views expressed were held at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.
While any forecast, projection or target where provided is indicative only and not guaranteed in any way. HSBC Global
Asset Management (UK) Limited accepts no liability for any failure to meet such forecast, projection or target.
HSBC ETFs are sub-funds of HSBC ETFs plc (“the Company”), an investment company with variable capital and
segregated liability between sub-funds, incorporated in Ireland as a public limited company, and is authorised by the
Central Bank of Ireland. The company is constituted as an umbrella fund, with segregated liability between sub-funds.
Shares purchased on the secondary market cannot usually be sold directly back to the Company. Investors must buy
and sell shares on the secondary market with the assistance of an intermediary (e.g. a stockbroker) and may incur fees
for doing so. In addition, investors may pay more than the current Net Asset Value per share when buying shares and
may receive less than the current Net Asset Value per Share when selling them. UK based investors in HSBC ETFs plc
are advised that they may not be afforded some of the protections conveyed by the Financial Services and Markets Act
(2000), (“the Act”). The Company is recognised in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority under section
264 of the Act. The shares in HSBC ETFs plc have not been and will not be offered for sale or sold in the United States of

                                                            11
America, its territories or possessions and all areas subject to its jurisdiction, or to United States Persons. Affiliated
companies of HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited may make markets in HSBC ETFs plc. All applications are
made on the basis of the current HSBC ETFs plc Prospectus, relevant Key Investor Information Document (“KIID”),
Supplementary Information Document (SID) and Fund supplement, and most recent annual and semi-annual reports,
which can be obtained upon request free of charge from HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited, 8 Canada
Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5HQ. UK, or from a stockbroker or financial adviser. The indicative intra-day net
asset value of the sub-funds is available on at least one major market data vendor terminal such as Bloomberg, as well
as on a wide range of websites that display stock market data, including www.reuters.com. Investors and potential
investors should read and note the risk warnings in the prospectus, relevant KIID and Fund supplement (where
available) and additionally, in the case of retail clients, the information contained in the supporting SID.
The funds or securities referred to herein are not sponsored, endorsed, or promoted by MSCI, and MSCI bears no liability
with respect to any such funds or securities or any index on which such funds or securities are based. The Supplement
to the Prospectus contains a more detailed description of the limited relationship MSCI has with HSBC ETFs plc and any
related funds.
All rights in the FTSE 100 vest in FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”). “FTSE®” is a trademark of London Stock Exchange
Group companies and is used by FTSE under licence. The HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF has been developed solely by
HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited. The Index is calculated by FTSE or its agent. FTSE and its licensors are
not connected to and do not sponsor, advise, recommend, endorse or promote the Product and do not accept any
liability whatsoever to any person arising out of (a) the use of, reliance on or any error in the Indices or (b) investment in
or operation of the Products. FTSE makes no claim, prediction, warranty or representation either as to the results to be
obtained from the Product or the suitability of the Indices for the purpose to which they are being put by HSBC Global
Asset Management (UK) Limited.
Standard & Poor’s and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) and Dow
Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”) and have been licensed for use
by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and sublicensed for certain purposes by HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited.
The S&P 500 is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, and has been licensed for use by HSBC Global Asset
Management (UK) Limited. HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited‘s HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF is not sponsored,
endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates, and neither S&P
Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates make any representation regarding the advisability of
investing in such product(s).
The value of investments and any income from them can go down as well as up and investors may not get back the
amount originally invested. Where overseas investments are held the rate of currency exchange may also cause the
value of such investments to fluctuate. Investments in emerging markets are by their nature higher risk and potentially
more volatile than those inherent in some established markets. Stock market investments should be viewed as a
medium to long term investment and should be held for at least five years. Any performance information shown refers to
the past and should not be seen as an indication of future returns.
To help improve our service and in the interests of security we may record and/or monitor your communication with us.
HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited provides information to Institutions, Professional Advisers and their
clients on the investment products and services of the HSBC Group. Approved for issue in the UK by HSBC Global Asset
Management (UK) Limited, who are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. HSBC Asset
Management is the brand name for the asset management business of HSBC Group, which includes the investment
activities provided through our local regulated entity, HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited. In Israel, HSBC
Bank plc (Israel Branch) is regulated by the Bank of Israel. This document is only directed in Israel to qualified investors
(under the Investment advice, Investment marketing and Investment portfolio management law-1995) of the Israeli
Branch of HBEU for their own use only and is not intended for distribution.
www.assetmanagement.hsbc.com/uk
Copyright © HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited 2021. All rights reserved.
XB-1610 EXP: 31/03/2022

                                                             12
You can also read