A Study on Fundamental Analysis of Automobile Companies (Car Manufacturing Companies) in India
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
International Journal of Scientific Research and Review ISSN NO: 2279-543X A Study on Fundamental Analysis of Automobile Companies (Car Manufacturing Companies) in India P. Devika1, 1 Asst. Professor, Department of BBA(CA), Sri Krishna Arts and Science College, Coimbatore. 1 E mail Id : devikap@skasc.ac.in Abstract: The term Financial Markets is often used to refer just to the markets that are used to raise finance. A financial market is a market in which people trade financial securities and derivatives such as futures and options at low transaction costs. An investor wants to invest his money in various kinds of securities but each and every investment contains some level of risk and as a reward he gets the return. But before making an investment in particular security he makes the analysis on the particular security. Fundamental analysis of Indian Automobile companies in which Five major automobile companies have considered which are having a major impact on Indian stock market, in which an investor is guided properly as to which stock is to be chosen for the future investment and which is to be not. In this research Exploratory Research Design is selected which is based on the secondary data. Years i.e. from 2014-18 for top five automobile companies (Car- Indian Manufacturing) namely Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai Motor India, Mahindra & Mahindra, Tata Motors and Honda Cars India. The researchers also compared the fundamentals of these 5 companies and applied different statistical tools. Key words: Fundamental Analysis, Automobile, NPA, ROE, P/E ratio. 1. Introduction Fundamental analysis studies the core underlying elements that influence the economy of a particular entity, like a stock or currency. It attempts to predict price action and trends by analyzing economic indicators, government policy, societal and other factors within a business cycle framework. The fundamental analyst would love to purchase the stock if the current market price is below its intrinsic value and would sell the stock when the market price goes far above the intrinsic value. Hence, fundamental analysis is important in stock picking. The Indian auto industry became the 4th largest in the world with sales increasing 9.5 per cent year-on-year to 4.02 million units (excluding two wheelers) in 2017. It was the 7th largest manufacturer of commercial vehicles in 2017. The Two Wheelers segment dominates the market in terms of volume owing to a growing middle class and a young population. Moreover, the growing interest of the companies in exploring the rural markets further aided the growth of the sector. India is also a prominent auto exporter and has strong export growth expectations for the near future. Automobile exports grew 20.78 per cent during April-November 2018. It is expected to grow at a CAGR of 3.05 per cent during 2016-2026. In addition, several initiatives by the Government of India and the major automobile players in the Indian market are expected to make India a leader in the two-wheeler and four wheeler market in the world by 2020. Volume 8, Issue 1, 2019 Page No: 911
International Journal of Scientific Research and Review ISSN NO: 2279-543X 2. Automobile Industry in India 3. Literature Review Richard C. Grimm (2012) explores fundamental analysis to determine its application as an Austrian approach to common stock selection. The Thymologic method and the category of understanding are applied as frameworks for an Austrian approach and to evaluate fundamental analysis as a process for common stock selection. The analysis supports the conclusion that fundamental security analysis can be practiced in a manner consistent with traditional Austrian views and is suitable as a common stock selection method by those who wish to adhere to such views. Venkates C K, Dr. Madhu Tyagi, Dr. Ganesh L (2012), revealed out that investors can create a stronger value portfolio by using simple historical financial performance. They used ‘F Score’ Model for the same. Hemal Pandya and Hetal Pandya (2013) carried out Fundamental Analysis of both the companies is carried out and their intrinsic value ranges are obtained from the EIC Analysis of Tata motors and Maruti Suzuki to help investor decisions. 4. Objectives of the Study [1] To evaluate the profitability position of Indian Car Manufacturing companies in the automobile sector. [2] To Analyze the fundamentals of sample automobile companies selected for study. 5. Research Method Data : Secondary Population : Companies in Automobile sector Source of data : Balance sheet, Stock Market, Websites Source of data : Quantitative Sample size : Top 5 Indian Car Manufacturing companies Statistical Tools : Mean, Standard Deviation & Ratios Time Period : 5 Years, 2014-2018 Volume 8, Issue 1, 2019 Page No: 912
International Journal of Scientific Research and Review ISSN NO: 2279-543X 6. Data Analysis and Interpretation Net Profit Margin: The percentage of revenue remaining after all operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends (but not common stock dividends) have been deducted from a company's total revenue. NPM indicates how much a company is able to earn all direct and indirect expenses for every rupee of revenue. The Toyota Kirloskar earned 509.99 for the NPM of the selected companies. Next Tata Motors earned 5.07 scores above all the companies as far as the NPM is concerned. Table 1 Maruti Mahindra Tata Toyota Year Ford Suzuki & Mahindra Motors Kirloskar 2014 6.36 9.27 0.97 4.28 686.27 2015 7.42 8.52 -13.05 5.86 1331.16 2016 9.32 7.83 -0.14 5.86 1268.31 2017 10.80 8.27 -5.48 4.28 816.25 2018 9.68 8.94 -1.75 4.28 2137.48 Mean 8.71 8.56 -3.89 4.91 1247.89 SD 1.60 0.50 5.07 0.77 509.99 Figure 1 Return on Equity: The Return on Equity ratio essentially measures the rate of return that the owners of common stock of a company receive on their shareholdings. Return on equity signifies how good the company is in generating returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. ROE indicates Tata Motors earned 12.14 equity, Mahindra & Mahindra earned 3.25 scores. Table 2 Mahind Maruti Tata Toyota Year ra & Ford Suzuki Motors Kirloskar Mahindra 2014 13.26 22.39 1.74 7.69 6.97 2015 15.65 17.25 -31.93 12.11 6.51 2016 17.95 14.29 -0.26 10.80 8.24 2017 20.17 13.60 -11.48 8.16 3.79 2018 18.49 14.37 -5.13 8.16 6.64 Mean 17.10 16.38 -9.41 9.38 6.43 SD 2.40 3.25 12.14 1.74 1.45 Volume 8, Issue 1, 2019 Page No: 913
International Journal of Scientific Research and Review ISSN NO: 2279-543X Figure 2 Asset Turnover Ratio (%): An efficiency ratio that measures a company's ability to generate sales from its assets by comparing net sales with average total assets. It’s Indicate Tata Motors turnover ratio 10.76 earned, Next score to Mahindra & Mahindra its 8.87 Table 3 Mahindra Maruti Tata Toyota Year & Ford Suzuki Motors Kirloskar Mahindra 2014 143.11 129.46 68.94 119.88 0.98 2015 148.93 118.21 72.67 133.39 0.46 2016 137.19 115.14 75.59 118.03 0.63 2017 132.74 110.22 75.26 136.17 0.45 2018 134.34 102.67 99.35 136.17 0.30 Mean 139.26 115.14 78.36 128.72 0.56 SD 5.98 8.87 10.76 8.06 0.23 Figure 3 Return on Assets: It measures the amount of profit the company generates as a percentage of the value of its total assets. ROA indicates Tata Motors earned 3.65, Maruti Suzuki earned 1.85 score, compared with the all the companies these two companies get the high earning in ROA. Volume 8, Issue 1, 2019 Page No: 914
International Journal of Scientific Research and Review ISSN NO: 2279-543X Table 4 Maruti Mahindra Tata Toyota Year Ford Suzuki & Mahindra Motors Kirloskar 2014 9.08 12.01 0.67 5.14 6.79 2015 11.04 10.08 -9.48 7.82 6.19 2016 12.86 9.02 -0.10 6.91 8.02 2017 14.45 9.11 -4.12 5.83 3.68 2018 13.07 9.18 -1.74 5.83 6.45 Mean 12.1 9.88 -2.95 6.30 6.22 SD 1.85 1.13 3.65 0.94 1.41 Figure 4 7. Suggestion [1] All the companies performed will during period of ten years. Their performance is also good and investors can invest their money in the shares of these companies. [2] NPM Indicates the Highest earnings from Toyota Kirloskar, It’s the best invest out of Five. 8. Conclusion A small investor may not have a huge investable amount. Hence, he cannot invest his money in different sectors. Therefore, his ability to diversify investment is very much restricted. A sensible investor should try to identify few sectors first and then should go for comprehensive study of the sector. He should inspect carefully the fundamentals of the sector before taking any investment decision. This paper help us to know the fundamentals of the automobile (Car-Indian Manufacturing) sector in India by taking a sample of top five leading automobile (Car-Indian Manufacturing) companies 9. References [1] Dyna Seng & Jason R. Hancock (2012), “Fundamental Analysis and the Prediction of Earnings”, International Journal of Business and Management Vol. 7, No. 3; February 2012. [Google Scholar] Financial reports of concerned companies fetched from moneycontrol.com. [Google Scholar] [2] Hemal Pandya and Hetal Pandya (2013), ‘Fundamental Analysis Of Indian Automobile Industry’, International Journal of Current Research, Vol. 5 , Issue, 5, pp.1273-1286. [Google Scholar] [3] Hossein Khanifar, Nasser Jamshidi & Mohammadbagher Mohammadinejad (2012), “Studying Affecting Factors on Analysts’ Decisions Regarding Share Analysis in Tehran Stock Exchange: A Fundamental Analysis Approach” European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences Issue 44 (2012). [Google Scholar] Volume 8, Issue 1, 2019 Page No: 915
International Journal of Scientific Research and Review ISSN NO: 2279-543X [4] Richard C. Grimm (2012), “Fundamental analysis as a traditional Austrian approach to common stock selection” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol.15, No.2, Summer 2012. [Google Scholar] [5] Venkates C K, Dr. Madhu Tyagi, Dr. Ganesh L (2012), ‘Fundamental analysis and stock returns: An Indian Evidence’ Global Advanced Research Journal of Economics, Accounting and Finance Vol. 1(2) pp. 033-039. [Google Scholar] Volume 8, Issue 1, 2019 Page No: 916
You can also read