A bridge to impactful sustainable investments - ESG Portfolio ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
A bridge to impactful sustainable investments Wirestock Images/Shutterstock.com August 2021 Stand: 11. August 2020 Only for professional clients and eligible counterparties. No onward transmission to private clients. 1
Agenda 1. Executive Summary 2. Company profile 3. Our Investment philosophy 4. Investment process 5. Customer-oriented implementation solutions 6. Appendix 2
Executive Summary Measurable positive impacts on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) should increase the expected performance of our funds. The selection of issuers with high ESG qualities should reduce the risk of the investments. We use careful research with internal credit rating models to construct our sustainable portfolios. Low carbon intensity and Paris Climate Agreement aligned funds. 3
Our Funds - Objectives SDG EVOLUTION FLEXIBEL: Conservative European Multi-Asset Strategy Financial Sustainability 1. Attractive absolute return 1. Average portfolio ESG rating of at least AA* 2. Positive total return target of over 4% 2. Minimum portfolio SDG impact of 40%* Pay-out target at least 2% 3. Hedging loss risks through ESG integration and 3. Achieves 1.75 degree target of the Paris Climate use of put options Agreement MAYENCE FAIR VALUE BOND FONDS: Conservative European investment grade fixed-income strategy Financial Sustainability 1. Attractive return compared to the European 1. Average portfolio ESG rating of at least AA* investment grade universe 2. Positive total return target of over 2% 2. Minimum portfolio SDG impact of 30%* Pay-out target at least 1% 3. Hedging loss risks through ESG integration and 3. Achieves 1.75 degree target of the Paris Climate use of put options Agreement *Data source: MSCI ESG; see appendix for metholdology 4
Company profile • 2018 June: Foundation of ESG Portfolio Management GmbH July: Takeover of the mixed fund SDG Evolution Flexibel • 2019 February: Takeover of the bond fund Mayence Fair Value Bond Fonds Conversion of both funds to the highest level of sustainability November: Both funds awarded the FNG label (three stars) • 2020 January: Received the German Excellence Award April: Highest rating in TELOS ESG Check June: Awarded as Sustainable Investment Award Multi-asset manager of the year October: Acceptance into the Leaders’ Group of the Principles for Responsible Investment November: Confirmation of the FNG label with three starts for both funds • 2021 January: ESG Investing Awards, Winner Best Fixed Income Fund, Winner Best Multi-Asset Fund July: German Award for sustainablility projects: first price in the category sustainable investing 5
Company profile Team Christoph Klein Frank Rothauge Lars Behl CFA, CEFA CFA Founder & Managing Partner Junior Portfolio Manager Co-Portfoliomanager ▪ 2018: Foundation of ESG Portfolio Management ▪ More than 20 years of professional equity ▪ Joined ESG Portfolio Management in August GmbH 2020 ▪ Partner and Portfolio Manager nordIX AG, 2017-2018 experience ▪ Advised as equity analyst many fund managers ▪ M.Sc. Business Administration with focus on ▪ Head Non-Financial Credit, Head ESG Credit, Senior „Financial Markets and Institutions“, Justus- Multi Asset Manager at Deutsche Asset Management, regarding equity selection 2007-2017 ▪ Head of the technology sector research team at Liebig University Giessen, 2017-2020 ▪ Credit Hedge Fonds Manager at Credaris and Tripoint, Sal. Oppenheim ▪ Master’s thesis on climate sensitivity of stock 2004-2007 ▪ Multiple winner as Germany‘s best telecom returns in different industries and regions ▪ Credit Portfolio Manager at Deutsche Bank and analyst ▪ B.Sc. Economics with focus on Deutsche Asset Management, 1998-2004 ▪ Contributed to more than 40 capital market „Environmental Management and Energy transactions Economics“, TU Dresden, 2014-2017 ▪ Visiting Scholar New York University, 2000 ▪ Training as bank clerk, Sparkasse Burbach- ▪ Graduate in Business Administration, University of ▪ Head of the audit committee at the supervisory board of the TecDax-company Drillisch AG, Neunkirchen, 2011-2014 Trier, 1999 ▪ Bank clerk at Deutsche Bank Bremen, 1991-1993 until October 2017 ▪ Portfolio Manager of the fund Universal – AHP ▪ Member of the UN PRI Fixed Income Working Group Aristoteles UI ▪ Speaker at DVFA and Moody‘s Analytics ▪ Managing Partner of AHP Capital Management ▪ Member of the DVFA Sustainable Investing Commission ▪ Volunteer at CFA Institute 6
Our Investment philosophy We believe: High ESG-qualities and positive SDG-impact in combination with detailed credit analysis and equity research are requirements to generate long-term competitive attractive risk-adjusted returns 7
Our Investment philosophy ESG & SDG ESG – Environmental, Social, Governance Risk management – to be able to sleep well SDG – Sustainable Development Goals Positive impact – reasons to get up in the morning 8
Unsere Investment-Philosophie Engagement und Proxy Voting We engage with companies to For instance, we improve their ESG quality and launched a global SDG impact. In particular, we initiative via UN fight for education, climate PRI with Kelloggs protection, product quality and to reduce their the avoidance of plastic waste. plastic consumption. We report transparently on We report transparently on our proxy voting: our engagements: https://www.esg-portfolio- https://www.esg-portfolio- management.com/wp- management.com/wp- content/uploads/2021/05/Pro content/uploads/2021/05/Enga xy-Voting-Report-2021-May- gement-Report-2021-May- 1.pdf 1.pdf We use proxy voting of shares in our funds to improve ESG quality and SDG impact. We exercise constructive criticism to improve, for example, labour safety and climate protection. 9
Investment process Multi-stage selection procedure Number of individual stocks: 20,000 • Investment universe of MSCI World • exclusion criteria and exclusion of 3,800 controversies 1,500 • ESG criteria. Minimum ESG rating: BBB 400 • sustainability impact of more than 5% on the SDGs • Alignment with 1.75 degree sectoral targets of Paris 250 Climate Agreement 200 • Carbon intensity below peers 100 • Detailed economic analysis and relative value analyses 10
Investment process Broad diversification (using the example of SDG Evolution Flexibel) Equities by country equities by industry sectors 10.09 % Norway 11.14 % Materials 5.95 % France 9.96 % Consumer Staples 5.92 % Australia 7.74 % Utilities 4.61 % Germany 3.56 % Switz erland 7.05 % Real Estate 2.98 % Canada 3.76 % Health Care 2.93 % Sweden 2.81 % Industrials 2.76 % Den mark 2.45 % Spain 2.30 % Consumer Discretionary 4.04 % Other 0.54 % Financials Fixed Income by country Fixed Income by sectors 13.22 % United States 8.58 % France 5.57 % Sweden 37.75 % Corporates 4.83 % United K in gd om 4.62 % Germany 8.45 % Financials no n-banking 4.01 % Neth erlands 3.32 % Financials 3.05 % Belgium 2.84 % Finland 0.94 % Spain 1.87 % Other For fund composition of the Mayence Fair Value Bond Fund see: Source: Universal Investment, July 30th 2021 https://fondsfinder.universal-investment.com/de/DE/Funds/DE000A2AQZE9/portfolio 11
Investment process ESG analysis & extensive exclusion criteria Maximum share of exclusion criterion turnover ▪ Weapons of mass destruction and controversial weapons ▪ Coal mining, processing & services ▪ High risk oil & gas (Fracking, Arctic Drilling, Oil Sands) We apply extensive exclusion 0% ▪ Nuclear power generation criteria and thoroughly analyse ▪ Uranium mining internally for individual relevant ▪ Embryonic stem cell research ESG factors before purchase to and cloning technology minimise the risk of loss. ▪ Coal-fired power generation ▪ Oil extraction, processing and power generation ▪ High risk oil & gas (services) ▪ Production and distribution of key components for nuclear power plants ▪ Biocides ▪ Animal testing 5% ▪ Genetic engineering in food production ▪ Civilian weapons ▪ Conventional tobacco products and alcohol ▪ Entertainment media (gambling, gaming, See appendix for methodology pornography) 12
Investment process Consideration of adverse impacts at the corporate level In the company analysis, we consider principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors. This ensures that the funds' investment objective is not achieved through adverse impacts on other sustainability areas. Within the framework of the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, we consider indicators on greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, water, waste and social and employee matters. See appendix for methodology of Principal Adverse Impact Analysis 13
Investment process ESG analysis (important part of risk management) Data sources: We use licenses from MSCI ESG, Bloomberg and CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project) and external research Method: We filter by ESG ratings and exclusion criteria and thoroughly analyse internally for individual relevant ESG factors before purchase to minimise risk of loss The minimum ESG rating of individual portfolio positions of our funds is BBB (currently the worst ESG rating is A). At fund level, we aim for average ESG ratings of AAA MSCI Portfolio ESG rating of the fund SDG Evolution Flexibel Source: https://www.msci.com/esg-fund-ratings/funds/sdg-evolution-flexibel-ak-i/68243264 See appendix for methodology 14
Investment process ESG risk management and investment example (ESG ratings from MSCI ESG) The mining company Vale S.A. had high environmental The electrical engineering group Schneider Electric SE risks due to the dam burst in 2019 and was given an was given the highest MSCI ESG rating of AAA. MSCI ESG rating of CCC. We use ESG ratings as a risk We were happy to invest in this company. The low management tool and accordingly did not invest in this environmental risks also supported the good company. performance of 32% in 2020. Sources: Der Spiegel, February 8th 2019; MSCI ESG Sources: Bloomberg; MSCI ESG See appendix for methodology See appendix for methodology 15
Investment process SDG analysis Data sources: For SDG impact SDG impact measurement for the fund SDG Evolution Flexibel: measurement, we use licences from MSCI ESG and ESG Screen17 as well as other external research. 45.3 % Method: We select companies with positive SDG impacts that have no negative impacts. Top 5 SDGs: The SDG impact of each position and 20.4 % 11.3 % 3.4 % 2.9 % 2.2 % of the fund as a whole is measured as the proportion of revenue that can be clearly attributed to an SDG. This value should be above 30% for all The values reflect the portfolio-weighted average of the percentage of revenues of each our portfolios. Most sustainable company generated by products and/or services with sustainable impacts. benchmarks only achieve a value of Sources: MSCI ESG, July 30th 2021, own calculations See appendix for methodology around 5%. 16
Investment process Examples with a positive SDG impact Fixed income: 2.25% Xylem INC. 2023 Private equity: Scatec Solar Source: http://www.xylem.com Source: http://scatecsolar.com • Xylem INC. is a manufacturer and service provider • Scatec Solar develops, builds and operates solar of water technologies such as water purification plants worldwide systems. • The company achieves the maximum SDG impact • The company operates the cycle of water collection, of 100% and received an ESG rating upgrade to purification and reuse AAA • Xylem INC. has an SDG impact of 44% and received an ESG rating upgrade to AAA by MSCI ESG in February 2019 due to successful waste reduction and increased focus on research and new product development 17
Investment process Context: climate risks • Climate risks are the most serious threats and are now receiving the highest attention from society, politicians, regulators and investors. • We are committed to ensuring that our funds meet and fall below the Paris targets of 1.75 degrees. According to heat strips from 1850-2018, global Increase in carbon emissions, especially in Asia: temperatures rise sharply from 1990 onwards: 1850 1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010 Source: Prof. Ed Hawkins: Warming stripes for 1850-2018. https://showyourstripes.info/ Source: https://www.consultancy.uk/news/13553/global-co2-emissions- and-the-20-most-polluting-countries-in-the-world 18
Investment process Context: climate risks Expected economic implications for different warming scenarios „It is up to the credit institutions to identify these opportunities and prepare for them in their business models and structures. In the long term, institutions failing to adapt might not be able to attract any more investors and customers as well as young, motivated employees. I dare say that in the long term only those credit institutions geared to sustainability will themselves have a sustainable Source: based on Chief Risk Officers Forum, 2019 existence on the market.“ 19
Investment process Context: climate risks Map of US population particularly exposed to sea level rise. Darker colours indicate higher population density and areas coloured blue will be at risk of flooding in the future. TOP 5 countries with the highest climate risks in 2040 Source: Four Twenty Seven, Measuring what matters, 2020 20
Investment process In-depth economic analysis - proprietary credit rating model We use in-house quantitative rating models as part of our credit rating analyses: We applied the discriminant analysis method to calculate the internal credit rating models. Quelle: http://www.thejei.com/quantitative-credit-rating-models-including-esg-factors/ 21
Investment process In-depth economic analysis - proprietary credit rating model We show here our model for industrial companies as an example: Internal Credit Rating Model: ✓ Linkage to Bloomberg data ✓ Modeling of internal ratings ✓ Allows simulations and scenario analyses ✓ Comparison with ratings of credit rating agencies 22
Customer-oriented implementation solutions Fund tranches overview SDG Evolution Flexibel SDG Evolution Flexibel Tranchen Mayence Fair Value Bond Fonds AK I AK R Share class Institutional Retail - WKN A1W9AZ A1W9AA A2AQZE ISIN DE000A1W9AZ5 DE000A1W9AA8 DE000A2AQZE9 Volume EUR 8.2 million EUR 0.7 million EUR 16.9 million Min. order volume From EUR100,000 Unlimited From EUR 25,000 Distribution Distributing Distributing Distributing Current Benchmark No Benchmark No Benchmark No Benchmark Costs Total costs* p.a. 1.14% 1.85% 1.11% Advisor ESG Portfolio Management GmbH ESG Portfolio Management GmbH Investment Management Universal-Investment-Gesellschaft mbH Universal-Investment-Gesellschaft mbH Company Custodian State Street Bank International GmbH Donner & Reuschel AG *related to the previous fiscal year or estimates or the case of new funds Source: Universal Investment, July 30th 2021 23
Customer-oriented implementation solutions Extremely high ESG quality of our funds and transparent reporting ESG scores of 9.5 (SDG Evolution Flexibel) and 9.6 (Mayence Fair Value Bond) are top values! (Maximum:10) 6% of the positions in Flexible and 7% of the positions in Mayence were recently upgraded, whereas none of the positions in Flexible and in Mayence were downgraded. Both funds receive the highest marks of the most valuable certification of sustainable funds in Germany: The FNG label with three stars each Both funds receive five globes from Morningstar (highest sustainability rating) Sources: MSCI ESG, July 30th 2021, https://fondstrends.lu/produkte-und-vertrieb/erfahrungsbericht-unsere-bewerbung-um-das-fng-siegel/; https://www.morningstar.de/de/funds/snapshot/snapshot.aspx?id=F00000SDU1 24
Low Carbon Emissions Our funds meet the goal of the Paris Climate Agreement The climate risk experts of "right. based on Our funds receive the highest climate rating by science" calculate: Climetrics: If all companies worked the way the companies in our funds do, global warming could be limited to around 1.75 degrees by 2050. Only about 3% of all funds analysed receive the maximum rating of five leaves. Source: https://www.right-basedonscience.de Source: https://www.cdp.net/en/investor/climetrics We also invest in companies that do not currently operate in a climate-neutral way, but show high efforts to reduce emissions. Through our investment, we can support them in the transition to a climate-neutral economy. 25
Customer-oriented implementation solutions Risk management To reduce the equity exposure, we use In volatile market phases puts on relevant equity indices such as we use short-term tactical DAX or EuroStoxx and carefully select the and longer-term anti-cyclical hedging portfolio weight, strikes and maturities to strategies be cost-efficient and achieve a positive convexity in the portfolio. We manage interest rate sensitivity via different instruments in order to avoid a We hedge currency risks "Bund future squeeze risk“ 26
Customer-oriented implementation solutions Where does the performance come from? Scenario analysis: Historic performance is no indication for future performance base case best worst (Equities+7%, (E+10, Y flat, (E-10, Y-1, Yields+0.5) Spread -10Bp) Spread +20Bp) Equity exposure x equity-portfolio-beta x equity market 2.3 3 -3 development Equity exposure x dividend yield (average: 2.5%) 0.75 0.75 0.75 Active Management of equity allocation and beta 0.5 0.5 0 Alpha from equity selection 0.5 1 -0.3 Fat tail management with equity options -0.5 -0.5 2.0 Interest duration (currently 1) -0.5 0 1 Active Management of interest duration and credit beta 0.5 1 -0.5 Credit duration (currently 4) 0 0.26 -0.52 Carry and oll own 0.33 0.33 0.33 Alpha from bond selection 0.5 1 -0.3 Cash -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 Sum 4.4 7.3 -0.6 Source: own estimates and calculations 27
Customer-oriented implementation solutions Individual solutions to your needs We use international We can implement all investment universes guidelines and criteria and a variety of suitable requested by clients investment instruments We actively manage We provide high quality your risk reporting We can support you in We can train your the process of employees in achieving the FNG label sustainable investments for your funds and/or and also in the EU mandates taxonomy. 28
Important Information & Disclaimer This information is intended exclusively for professional customers or suitable counterparties as defined in the WpHG and is not intended for private customers. This advertisement does not constitute investment advice. No guarantee is given as to the accuracy and completeness of the information and any liability for any damage resulting from the use and / or disclosure of this information is rejected. The information is directed only at investors in the countries in which the respective fund is authorized for distribution. They are not intended for publication or use by persons or companies in a country in which the fund is not authorized for distribution. In particular, the units of the respective fund may not be offered for sale or sold within the USA nor to or for the account of US citizens or US persons resident in the USA. The documents published here, and the information contained therein may not be distributed in the USA or in other countries in which distribution is not permitted. The fund portrait is for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or solicitation to buy or sell shares in the fund. The sole basis for the purchase of units is the sales documents (key investor information, sales prospectus, annual and semi-annual reports) relating to the fund. Sales documents relating to all of the investment funds of Universal-Investment are available free of charge from your adviser / broker, the responsible depositary or Universal-Investment at http://www.universalinvestment.com. The fund has increased volatility due to its composition and investment policy, which means that unit prices may be subject to significant upward and downward fluctuations within a short period of time. Calculations or yield data are not to be understood as a yield commitment; they are purely indicative and based on data and assumptions that may possibly not be realized in practice, only in a different form or at different times. As a result, there is a risk that, in reality, lower returns or even losses, even total loss, will be achieved. Past performance is no indication of future performance. ESG Portfolio Management GmbH, headquartered in Frankfurt am Main, is an owner-managed company with core competence in bank-independent advice on capital market products. It develops tailor-made solutions for professional investors in order to generate sustainably adequate income despite rather low risk budgets. ESG Portfolio Management is initiator and advisor to the funds SDG Evolution Flexibel and Mayence Fair Value Bond Fonds. The information may not be reproduced in extracts or as a whole without the written permission of the creator or passed on to other persons. ESG Portfolio Management GmbH is part of the investment brokerage of financial instruments and investment advice pursuant to Sec. § 1 KWG exclusively on account and under the liability of AHP Capital Management GmbH, Weißfrauenstraße 12-16, 60311 Frankfurt am Main, active (§ 2 para 10 KWG). 29
Appendix Parameters: SDG Evolution Flexibel SDG EVOLUTION FLEXIBEL: Conservative European Multi-Asset Strategy Min Max Gross equity exposure 25% 45.3 49% Net equity exposure 0% 35.1 49% Rating BB- BBB+ AAA Net Effective Duration 0 0.63 5 Incl. derivatives Spread Duration 4 5.61 7 HY/NR exposure 0% 9.4 20% EM exposure 0% 0 10% Currency risks are hedged by at least 99%. Source: Universal Investment, July 30th 2021 30
Appendix Low carbon footprint and transparent reporting ESG, SDG and carbon intensity over time lines: SDG Evolution Flexibel dots: Benchmark (30% iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened / 70% db x-trackers II ESG EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) 60 0 CO2 t/m sales SDG, ESG SDG (45.3) 50 20 40 40 60 BM: CO2 t/m 30 (80.7) CO2 t/m (69.9) 80 20 BM: SDG 100 (9.9) ESG (9.5) 10 120 BM: ESG 0 140 (8.5) Nov Nov Nov Jul Jul Juli Jul Sep Jan Feb Jun Sep Jan Feb Jun Sep Jan Feb Jun BM Dez Mrz Dez Mrz Dez Mrz Aug Aug Aug Apr Apr Apr Mai Mai Mai Okt Okt Okt 2018 2019 2020 2021 ESG SDG CO2 t/m sales Source: MSCI ESG, July 30th 2021 See appendix for methodology 31
Appendix SDG Evolution Flexibel AK I Since 02.07.2018 ESG Portfolio Management GmbH advises the fund (green fields) and integrates sustainability from 2019 ISIN: WKN: Currency: Volume: Total fund size: DE000A1W9AZ5 A1W9AZ EUR 8.2 Mio. EUR 11 Mio. EUR Cumulated performance (in %) Since 1M 1Y 3Y 5Y CY 2018 2019 2020 inception fund -0.4 2.7 1.8 6.3 7.4 -1.8 -4.8 2.6 5.4 fund p.a. 0.6 1.2 1.0 Monthly performance (in %) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dez YTD 2015 2.58 0.63 -0.49 -0.38 -2.49 1.52 -4.97 -1.13 4.00 1.90 -1.86 2.19 2016 -3.02 -2.12 1.21 -0.19 -0.17 -1.83 0.64 0.50 -0.47 -0.37 -0.93 1.41 -5.32 2017 0.16 1.13 1.51 0.85 0.28 -1.33 0.34 -0.72 2.96 0.84 -0.62 -0.32 5.12 2018 0.92 -1.36 -1.01 1.38 -1.23 -0.53 1.16 -0.84 -0.12 -1.57 0.42 -2.09 -4.84 2019 1.78 1.65 0.44 1.17 -1.07 -1.13 0.03 -1.22 -0.83 -0.08 1.18 0.68 2.55 2020 0.32 0.52 -6.43 2.72 0.20 3.22 0.53 0.63 -0.81 0.53 2.86 1.30 5.37 2021 0.03 -1.67 0.85 -0.19 -0.31 -0.05 -0.40 -1.75 Source: Universal Investment, July 30th 2021 32
Appendix Parameters: SDG Evolution Flexibel SDG EVOLUTION FLEXIBEL: Conservative European Multi-Asset Strategy Financial Sustainability Ø net equity 35% (max. brutto 49%) Carbonintensity (tCO2e/ $m sales) share 85 number positions 40 - 75 (Ø 60) 80 75 Return 1Y Sharpe Ratio 1Y 70 12% 2 65 10% 1,5 60 8% 6% 1 SDG Evolution Flexibel Benchmark 4% 0,5 2% 0% 0 ESG Score SDG Impact SDG Evolution Benchmark SDG Evolution Benchmark Flexibel Flexibel 10 100% 9,5 80% Sources: Universal Investment, MSCI, DWS, iShares, finanzen.net 9 60% As of: July 30th 2021 8,5 40% Benchmark: 30% iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened / 8 20% 70% db x-trackers II ESG EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 7,5 0% SDG Evolution Benchmark SDG Evolution Benchmark Flexibel Flexibel Sources: Universal Investment, MSCI, DWS, iShares See appendix for methodology As of: July 30th 2021 33
Appendix MSCI Sustainable Impact Assessment Source: MSCI Sustainable Impact Portfolio Snapshot, July 30th 2021 34
Appendix MSCI Sustainable Impact Assessment (Themes) Source: MSCI Sustainable Impact Portfolio Snapshot, July 30th 2021 35
Appendix Allocation of MSCI Sustainable Impact Themes to SDGs SDG Evolution Flexibel as at 30th July 2021 USD according to allocation MSCI ESG Area MSCI ESG Theme in % MSCI ESG SDG Basic Needs Nutrition 123.877 2 1 No poverty 2.162 0,3 Affordable Real Estate 2 1 2 Zero hunger 162.781 20,4 Major Desease Treatment 13.196 3 3 Good health and well-being 13.196 1,7 Sanitation 11.880 6 4 Quality education 22.933 2,9 5 Gender equality 0 0,0 6 Clean water and sanitation 12.983 1,6 Empowerement SME Finance 4.320 1, 8 7 Sustainable energy 27.274 3,4 Education 22.933 4 8 Decent work and economic growth 2.160 0,3 Connectivity 705 9 9 Industry, innovation and infrastructure 5.751 0,7 10 Reduce inequalities 0 0,0 Climate Change Alternative Energy 17.219 13 11 Sustainable cities and communities 5.046 0,6 Energy Efficiency 27.274 7 12 Sustainable consumption and production 90.627 11,3 Green Building 10.092 9, 11 13 Climate action 17.219 2,2 14 Life below water 0 0,0 Natural Capital Sustainable Water 1.103 6 15 Life on Land 0 0,0 Pollution Prevention 90.627 12 16 Peace, justice and strong institutions 0 0,0 Sustainable Agriculture 38.904 2 17 Partnerships for the goals 0 0,0 Summe 362.132 45,3% 45,3% Source: MSCI Sustainable Impact Portfolio Snapshot & own allocation to SDGs, 30th July 2021 36
Appendix Parameters: Mayence Fair Value Bond Fonds MAYENCE FAIR VALUE BOND FONDS: Conservative European investment grade fixed-income strategy Min Max Credit Rating BB- BBB+ AAA Net Effective Duration 1 3.09 5 Incl. derivatives Spread Duration 4 6.43 7 HY/NR exposure 0% 5.32 20% EM exposure 0% 0.0 10% Currency risks are hedged by at least 99%. Source: Universal Investment, July 30th 2021 37
Appendix Low carbon footprint and transparent reporting ESG, SDG and carbon intensity over time lines: Mayence Fair Value Bond Fonds dots: Benchmark (db x-trackers II ESG EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) SDG, ESG CO2 t/m sales 40 0 SDG (33) 35 20 40 30 60 25 80 BM: CO2 t/m CO2 t/m (49.8) (50.2) 20 100 15 120 BM: ESG ESG (9.6) 140 (8.6) 10 160 5 180 BM: SDG (7.9) 0 200 Jul Nov Juli Nov Jul Feb Jun Sep Feb Jun Sep Feb Jun BM Mrz Dez Mrz Dez Mrz Aug Aug Apr Apr Apr Mai Mai Mai Okt Okt Jan Jan Jan 2019 2020 2021 ESG SDG CO2 t/m sales Source: MSCI ESG, July 30th 2021 See appendix for methodology 38
Appendix Mayence Fair Value Bond Fonds Since February 2019 ESG Portfolio Management GmbH advises the fund (green fields) and integrates sustainability ISIN: WKN: Currency: Volume: DE000A2AQZE9 A2AQZE EUR 16.9 Mio. EUR Cumulated performance (in %) Since 1M 1Y 3Y 5Y CJ 2018 2019 2020 inception Fonds 0.5 0.8 -0.3 -0.1 -0.2 -3.1 -0.1 1.7 Fonds p.a. -0.1 0.0 Monthly performance (in %) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTD 2017 -0.54 1.62 -0.15 1.04 -0.20 -0.35 -0.46 0.09 0.39 0.79 -0.66 0.03 1.58 2018 -0.55 0.07 -0.66 0.61 -0.41 -1.75 1.31 -0.56 0.81 -0.68 -0.73 -0.52 -3.07 2019 1.06 0.63 -0.37 0.68 0.01 -0.30 0.07 -0.98 -0.72 0.12 -0.29 0.04 -0.06 2020 0.4 0.45 -3.93 0.65 0.75 1.55 0.95 0.16 0.00 0.56 0.34 -0.14 1.65 2021 0.02 -0.64 -0.13 0.29 -0.26 0.04 0.51 -0.16 Source: Universal Investment, July 30th 2021 39
Appendix Parameters: Mayence Fair Value Bond Fonds MAYENCE FAIR VALUE BOND FONDS: Conservative European investment grade fixed-income strategy Financial Sustainability number positions 40 - 60 (Ø 50) Carbonintensity (tCO2e/ $m sales) Return 1Y Sharpe Ratio 1Y 50,4 3,0% 2 50,2 2,5% 1,5 2,0% 50 1,5% 1 1,0% 49,8 0,5 0,5% 0,0% 0 49,6 Mayence Fair Benchmark Mayence Fair Benchmark Mayence Fair Value Bond Fonds Benchmark Value Bond Value Bond Fonds Fonds Sources: Universal Investment, DWS, finanzen.net ESG Score SDG Impact As of: June 30th 2021 10 100% Benchmark: db x-trackers II ESG EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 9,5 80% 9 60% 8,5 40% 8 20% 7,5 0% Mayence Fair Benchmark Mayence Fair Benchmark Value Bond Value Bond Fonds Fonds Sources: Universal Investment, MSCI, DWS See appendix for methodology As of: July 30th 2021 40
Appendix Methodology for calculating sustainability indicators Data provider KPI/Tool Further information MSCI ESG ESG Ratings 1.) https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/21901542/MSCI+ESG+Ratings+Methodology+- +Exec+Summary+Nov+2020.pdf 2.) https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/1283513/MSCI_ESG_Metrics_Calc_Methodology_Dec 2020.pdf/92a299cb-0dbc-63ba-debb-e821bd2e2b08 ESG Fund Ratings https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/15388113/MSCI+ESG+Fund+Ratings+Exec+Summar y+Methodology.pdf SDG Alignment https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/16472518/ESG_ImpactMetrics-cfs-en.pdf/7a03ddab- 46fd-cef7-5211-c07ab992d17b Principle Adverse Impacts https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/26144308/Issuer-level-data-EU-Sustainable-Finance- Module-cfs-en-DMC.pdf Carbon Intensity https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/1283513/MSCI_ESG_Metrics_Calc_Methodology_Dec 2020.pdf/92a299cb-0dbc-63ba-debb-e821bd2e2b08 (chapter 3.2) right. based on XDC-Gap-Analyse https://www.right-basedonscience.de/en/xdc-model/ science (Temperature Alignment) ESG Screen17 Screening for exclusion criteria https://www.screen17.com/#product Last retrieved: July 13th 2021 41
You can also read