2014 on Real Estate | Canada

Page created by Robert Manning
 
CONTINUE READING
2014 on Real Estate | Canada
on Real Estate | Canada

                    2014
2014 on Real Estate | Canada
Perspective on Real Estate 2010

            ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
            We would like to acknowledge the assistance we received from the following parties in
            completing this report:

            Benefits Canada, Bloomberg, CB Richard Ellis, CIBC World Markets, Canadian Institutional
            Investment Network, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Centre for the Study of
            Commercial Activity (CSCA), Colliers International, Conference Board of Canada, Cushman &
            Wakefield LePage, Cushman & Wakefield LePage Valuation and Advisory Services, Economap
            Inc., Frank Russell Canada (RCPI), Global Insight, Globe & Mail, InSite-Altus Research,
            International Council of Shopping Centres (ICSC), Investment Property Databank Ltd. (IPD), J.J.
            Barnicke, Kubas Consultants, MCAP Inc., National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
            (NAREIT), National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF), National Post, RBC
            Capital Markets, RBC Financial Group, RealNet Canada, RealTrack, Standard & Poor’s, Statistics
            Canada, Scotia Capital, TD Economics, Vizbits.

            We would also like to thank the many individuals who are employed by these parties as well as
            the real estate owners and managers who helped us with insights and guidance along the way.

            On the cover: 121 King Street West, Toronto, ON
            (owner: Prime Canadian Property Fund)

            Copyright © 2014 by Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
            All rights reserved
            The information and statistics contained in this report were obtained from sources deemed reliable.
            However, Bentall Kennedy Group does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information
            presented, nor does it assume any responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions. All opinions
            expressed and data provided herein are subject to change without notice. This report cannot be reproduced
            in part or in full in any format without the prior written consent of Bentall Kennedy Group.

2|   Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
2014 on Real Estate | Canada
Contents
Chapter 1 Executive Overview                               5

Chapter 2 Economic Outlook                                 9

Chapter 3 Real Estate & Capital Markets
           Investment Summary                            21
           Debt Markets                                  29
           Public Equity Market                          32

Chapter 4 Space Market Trends
           Office                                        36
           Retail                                        40
           Industrial                                    44
           Multi-residential                             48

Chapter 5 Regional Overviews
           Vancouver                                     54
           Calgary                                       56
           Edmonton                                      58
           Toronto                                       60
           Ottawa                                        66
           Montreal                                      68

Bentall Kennedy Group                                    71

                                          Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP   |3
2014 on Real Estate | Canada
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

Bentall V, Vancouver BC
(owner: Prime Canadian Property Fund together with other Bentall Kennedy clients)
2014 on Real Estate | Canada
Executive Overview                1
At a Turning Point?
As we progress through the fifth year of recovery from the Great                 “With rising values
Financial Crisis of 2008, we appear to finally be able to “expect the
expected” rather than the unexpected, albeit still needing to live with           and cap rates for
diminished expectations. After three years leading the pack, Canada
has now experienced two years of modest growth. The U.S. continued
                                                                              “best-in-class” properties
its chaotic political environment but moved toward the front of the           at record lows, investors
pack by maintaining its moderate growth. Meanwhile, weaker domestic
fundamentals in conjunction with lackluster trade demand is thwarting           should be concerned
the ability for emerging markets to sustain the type of robust growth           about the future path
that powered the global economy during the last decade. As we wrote
last year, investors must expect these sluggish economic conditions to            of interest rates.”
persist as the global economy continues to slowly work off the excesses
and imbalances it accumulated over the past decade.

Through all the twists and turns of the past year, real estate continued
to deliver strong returns to investors. In an environment of low interest
rates, the stable, growing cash flows of operating properties continue
to attract a broad range of investors. Despite beginning the year with
cap rates near all time lows, operating properties delivered double
digit total return in both the United States and Canada. In keeping
with the economic story, income growth accounted for the majority of
appreciation in the U.S. while cap rate compression, especially among
the very highest quality properties, accounted for the majority of capital
appreciation in Canada.

With rising values and cap rates for “best-in-class” properties at
record lows, investors should be concerned about the future path of
interest rates. As the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank begins tapering its
extraordinary program of quantitative easing, the first small step in
withdrawing the excess liquidity that leading central banks have pushed
into the market to support the global recovery over the past five years,
two opposite risks develop. On the one hand, there is a risk that the
withdrawal of liquidity is too slow, resulting in excess stimulation of the
economy, potential asset price bubbles and eventually, sharply rising
inflation. On the other hand, there is a risk that the economy is too
weak to absorb the withdrawal of stimulus, resulting in slower economic
growth as inflation declines even further below the comfort zone of 2%,
potentially even resulting in deflation. Real estate investors must be
alert for both risks.

                                                                                           Kennedy (Canada) LP   |5
2014 on Real Estate | Canada
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

In the first case, the near term should bring stronger     income growth must come to the fore in investment
real estate demand growth, particularly among              strategy. Location and property quality become
properties with a high exposure to the U.S. economy        much more important in this phase of the cycle. As
and continued low interest rates, followed later by        discussed in detail in the capital markets and property
rising inflation. All of these are apparently positive     sections, 2013 highlighted a clear differentiation
for real estate investors, but carry with them the         between “best-in-class” and more commodity-type
substantial risk that the acceleration of supply           properties, as increased supply and reduced demand
growth already experienced in 2013 continues as            has begun to shift bargaining power from landlords
values rise faster than the cost of construction. Rising   to tenants in some markets. This was quite evident
prices without excessive new supply poses a short          in the retail sector, where the limited number of
term pricing risk for investors but does not put at        fortress malls continued to be strongly in demand by
jeopardy future income streams. Excessive supply is        retailers while centres without strong anchors and/
the real risk that investors must monitor, as it does      or not offering a differentiated shopping experience,
jeopardize future income streams. The development          showed signs of strain. As the invasion of American
discipline that Canada experienced in all property         and other foreign retailers continues in Canada,
types except residential condominiums over the past        this distinction between “good and bad” is likely to
20 years produced an unprecedented string of years         accelerate since these retailers are used to competing
of positive income growth, in stark contrast to the        in markets with too much retail space and a long term
repeating pattern of supply excess and wide cycles         pattern of “winning and losing” shopping centres.
of income growth in the United States. While we
remain optimistic that Canada will continue to resist
excess development, the country is currently in the              “ With the shift from capital
midst of a very active commercial development cycle,           market tailwinds to headwinds
particularly in downtown office properties. As such,
investors must be more alert to this risk than at any         and the recent moderation of the
time in the last 20 years.
                                                                Canadian economy, property
In the second case, where the economy is too weak              level performance and income
to absorb the withdrawal of stimulus, the near term
brings initially higher interest rates followed by a          growth must come to the fore in
decline in demand, perhaps to the level of another                  investment strategy.”
recession, and likely then followed by a period of
further prolonged low interest rates. In this scenario,
near term supply risk is augmented by demand risk.         In the office market, the differentiation appeared as
Investors must be prepared for lower values initially,     a continued shift in demand toward properties with
as rising interest rates eliminate the remaining spread    strong sustainability features, especially public transit
to current cap rates and then as weaker demand             and energy efficiency. While downtown occupancies
growth impacts income. The real risk in this scenario      remained above suburban in most Canadian markets,
is deflation and its pernicious impact on all areas of     the gap has recently narrowed, with accessible
demand. Fortunately, younger demographics and              suburban properties performing better than more
solid population growth mean both the United States        generic office properties in several markets. Flexibility
and Canada have less deflation risk than the rest of       of space utilization and cost is an increasingly
the developed world.                                       important criterion for office users and some are
                                                           finding that comparatively more affordable suburban
With the shift from capital market tailwinds to            buildings can provide better flexibility than older
headwinds and the recent moderation of Canadian            urban towers.
economic growth, property level performance and

6|   Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
2014 on Real Estate | Canada
Executive Overview                 1
Among industrial properties, modern distribution        the respective levels seen in the U.S. at the height of
facilities able to meet the demands of global           its housing bubble in 2006, suggesting that demand
logisticians remain strongly in demand. Older           in Canada may now be at or near a peak. This is
properties without the ceiling height, floor loading,   particularly true since the direction of interest rates is
and dock ratios demanded by these tenants are forced    more likely to move higher than lower going forward.
to compete for local tenants on price.                  If housing demand materially softens and condo
                                                        prices and average rents begin to fall in response
The housing sector remains a source of strength for     to excess supply, it could prompt condo investors
the Canadian economy but is also an area which          to dump product, thereby further amplifying the
requires the closest attention. High rise condominium   imbalances in this sector.
development continues at extraordinary levels,
especially in Canada’s largest city – Toronto –         As the Canadian economy and thus real estate
although historically low mortgage rates and healthy    demand growth shifts from leader to middle of the
population growth have kept unsold inventories          pack, investors need to be especially vigilant and
low for now. Lenders have ensured that each             focused on the defensibility of the income streams in
individual project continues to meet strong pre-        their investments and the ability and sophistication
sales requirements and stable prices have kept          of their managers. As we wrote last year, we are now
both investor and occupier demand high. But it          in the part of the cycle where alpha generation must
is important to remember that these conditions          replace beta as the primary driver of solid returns in
are not inconsistent with a speculative bubble.         real estate. The heterogeneity of real estate has long
Homeownership rates in Canada have surged to            made it an asset class where well executed strategies
70% and household debt to income ratios are at a        can produce solid returns through most parts of the
record high of over 160%. These figures are above       economic and capital market cycle. •

                                                                                   Bayview Village, Toronto, ON
                                                                                                 (owner: bcIMC)
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

Bayview at Coal Harbour, Vancouver, BC
(owner: bcIMC)
Economic Outlook                                       2
Global Economy: A Light
at the End of the Tunnel
Viewed from the rear view mirror, the path of the global economy                                      “Forward looking
has certainly been grim. Weighed down by significant fiscal austerity,
economic growth has come up short of its potential in most advanced                                indicators suggest that
economies with the Euro area still mired in recession. Unemployment
has also been persistently high across much of the advanced world
                                                                                                  global growth while still
as the considerable excesses accumulated over the previous decade                                   sluggish, is regaining
continue to get worked off. Even emerging markets – previously the
powerhouses that once delivered much of the heavy lifting for the                                       momentum.”
global economy – have experienced a substantial deceleration in the
pace of their expansions.

Fortunately the view ahead appears to be considerably brighter and
for the first time in a long time, there are signs of a light at the end of
the tunnel. In fact, a number of recent data
reports and forward looking indicators suggest
that global economic growth – while still                  Fig. 2.1
sluggish compared to historical averages – is              Annual Real GDP Growth
finally regaining momentum (see Fig. 2.1).
                                                             10
Much of the positive news springs from the
beleaguered advanced countries themselves.                     8

                                                                      6
The United States, for example, has recently
                                                       Y/Y % Change

                                                                      4
seen decent progress in job growth and
housing demand while a number of U.S.                                 2
purchasing managers’ surveys have shown                               0
unexpectedly strong increases in business
                                                                      -2
sentiment. On the other side of the Atlantic,                                Euro Area
                                                                             Emerging Market and
business and consumer confidence indices in                           -4
                                                                             Developing Economies
the Eurozone moved to their highest levels in                         -6
                                                                             Major Advanced Economies (G7)
more than two years in late 2013, indicating                               2000   2002   2004   2006   2008   2010    2012 2014F 2016F 2018F
a potential rise in consumer spending. In
                                                                                                                     Source: IMF; October 2013 Forecast
addition, the Eurozone’s ZEW index – a key
indicator of investor confidence – rose in late

                                                                                                                       Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP        |9
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

2013 to its highest level in more than four years,       going. In fact, the ECB’s governor pledged that policy
indicating that the end of recession may be close        rates will remain at “present or lower levels for an
at hand. Even the dysfunctional Japanese economy         extended period of time.” A similar refrain has been
has displayed some vigor. Led by Prime Minister          heard from other major central banks across the
Shinzo Abe’s ambitious monetary and fiscal plan to       world.
end deflation and jump-start growth, “Abenomics”
delivered average annualized growth in Japan of          There is certainly plenty of room for monetary policy
nearly 4% during the first half of 2013.                 to remain extremely accommodative. With so much
                                                         excess slack lingering in advanced economies, rapidly
Such improvements have helped to offset the              growing consumer prices are nowhere to be seen,
deceleration in economic activity occurring in several   as inflation rates sit broadly below the targeted
emerging markets particularly China, where years         2% range of most central banks (see Fig. 2.2). This
of “double-digit” growth have long since ended.          is especially true in the Eurozone where signs of
Although emerging market growth rates continue           deflation (falling prices) have even appeared. It is
to handily outperform the advanced world, financial      unlikely that inflation rates in advanced countries
imbalances and structural reforms are expected           can comfortably return to or exceed targets until
to hold a number of these economies back from            well after 2016, when much of the excessive slack
growing at their full potential over the near and        accumulated over the past few years should finally be
medium term.                                             absorbed.

Slower demand in emerging markets, along with            Although consumer inflation remains subdued,
technological innovations that have helped to            policy officials, particularly the U.S. Federal Reserve,
increase supply, is a principal reason why commodity     are growing increasingly concerned about their
prices are not delivering the same type of explosive,    prolonged experimentation with quantitative easing
shortage-induced growth evident in the last decade.      (asset purchases funded by money printing) and its
This may be evidence that the “commodity super           potential role in creating asset price distortions and
cycle” – a key global economic theme during the
last decade – has come to an end. For resource-
based economies such as Australia, Canada and                  Fig. 2.2
Brazil, slower commodity price growth has directly             Annual Inflation
contributed to a slower economic expansion and
lower resource revenues. It has also taken some of                         7
                                                                                                                           World
the shine off their commodity-driven currencies.                                                                           Advanced Economies
                                                                           6

To be sure, policy measures continue to be a major                         5
                                                            Y/Y % Change

factor influencing the trajectory of global growth.
                                                                           4
Political bickering and brinksmanship aside, fiscal
developments are thankfully becoming less of a                             3
drag in most advanced economies as the size of
                                                                           2
government spending cuts becomes smaller and
government revenues increase in-line with better                           1
nominal GDP growth. Offsetting the impact of fiscal
                                                                           0
tightening over the last few years is the persistence                          06   07   08   09   10   11   12   13 14F 15F 16F 17F 18F
of extremely stimulative monetary policy and most
central bankers remain committed to keeping policy                                                                 Source: IMF October 2013 Forecast

rates near their current levels to keep the recovery

10 |   Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
Economic Outlook                        2
excessive risk-taking by investors. Partly because of   outcome that might be welcome by some of these
this, the Fed began its long journey towards winding    countries because it improves their relative trade
down its QE program with a modest tapering of its       positions.
asset purchases beginning in early 2014. (See U.S.
economy section).                                       Other risks also remain present for the global
                                                        economy including the potential for exogenous
Tapering should be viewed as a concrete sign that the   shocks caused by geopolitics and extreme weather.
U.S. economy is becoming more capable of standing       In our increasingly interconnected, 24/7 world,
on its own two feet. But its effects could also pose    such surprises, regardless of where they occur, will
some risk to the global economy since it has the        continue to draw an immediate reaction from financial
potential to disrupt financial markets by drawing       markets. This type of volatility is a theme that
global capital flows back to the U.S., weakening        investors have certainly grown accustomed to over
foreign equity markets and asset values. On the other   the last several years and one that is not about to
hand, it has the effect of weakening the currencies     abate any time soon.
of some of America’s chief trading partners – an

                                                                                   Hillside Centre, Victoria, BC
                                                                       (owner: Prime Canadian        Property
                                                                                        Bentall Kennedy              | 11
                                                                                                        (Canada) LPFund)
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

       United States
       Turning the corner                                                                                                  exceptional business investment growth in several
                                                                                                                           U.S. states, and reducing oil imports as well as the
       After five long years, the U.S. economy looks like                                                                  U.S. trade deficit. The U.S. now produces more
       it has finally reached a turning point for the better.                                                              natural gas than Canada, the number one energy
       Consumers and businesses have rebuilt their balance                                                                 exporter to the U.S. It is expected to even produce
       sheets, paid down debts and are spending again. The                                                                 more oil than Russia and Saudi Arabia (the previous
       housing market has worked off much of the excesses                                                                  world leaders) by 2020 making the U.S. a step closer
       that led it into a bubble with both the homeowner                                                                   to energy self-sufficiency (see Fig. 2.5). With natural
       and renter vacancy rate approaching long term                                                                       gas prices much lower than in many other advanced
       averages (see Fig 2.3). Governments are also seeing                                                                 economies ($4 versus $12 in Europe), the U.S. now
       good news. Although fiscal austerity remains the                                                                    enjoys a cost advantage in terms of production and
       most intense since the post-War period, the federal                                                                 transportation that is unlikely to be challenged any
       deficit is now the smallest in five years thanks not                                                                time soon.
       only to cost-cutting, but also rising revenues (see Fig
       2.4). Even many state and municipal administrations                                                                 All told, these positive developments have forecasters
       have seen increasing revenues. And while the national                                                               ramping up their expectations for the U.S. economy
       unemployment rate (at just above 7%) remains higher                                                                 with most anticipating growth to strengthen to just
       than its long term historical average and there is still                                                            below 3% in 2014 - considerably faster than the
       plenty of slack to keep a lid on wage growth, job                                                                   1.9% rate estimated for 2013. Barring an unforeseen
       gains are broadening across sectors and regions of                                                                  shock, expectations for 2015 are even better with
       the U.S. with unemployment declining in a majority of                                                               growth likely to surpass 3% - near the U.S. economy’s
       states over the past year.                                                                                          potential and going a long way to absorbing the
                                                                                                                           remaining slack left over from the Great Recession.
       Meantime, the shale energy boom is driving

       Fig. 2.3                                                                                                            Fig. 2.4
       Homeowner & Renter Vacancy Rate*                                                                                    U.S. Federal Budget Balance

                4.0                                                                                       12                          4.0
                           Homeowner (LHS)
                           Renter (RHS)
                3.5                                                                                                                   2.0
                                                                                                          10
                3.0                                                                                                                   0.0
Homeowner (%)

                                                                                                          8
                2.5                                                                                                                   -2.0
                                                                                                              Renter (%)

                                                                                                                           % of GDP

                2.0                                                                                       6                           -4.0

                1.5                                                                                                                   -6.0
                                                                                                          4
                1.0                                                                                                                   -8.0
                                                                                                          2
                0.5                                                                                                               -10.0

                0.0                                                                                       0                       -12.0
                      56   60   64   68   72   76   80    84    88     92    96    00    04    08    12                                 2000   2003   2006   2009   2012    2015      2018       2021

                                               Source: Census Bureau, *Straight lines are long term averages                                                               Source: Congressional Budget Office

       12 |           Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
Economic Outlook                          2
Fig. 2.5                                                                                        Fed crafts an exit strategy
Oil Production - Millions Barrels a Day
                                                                                                Given the momentum evident in the U.S. economy
              15                                                                                and growing concerns that excessive monetary
                                                                                                stimulus could potentially be causing a number
                                                                                                of financial market distortions (including possible
              10
                                                                                                asset price bubbles) the Federal Reserve began
Oil Barrels

                                                                                                telegraphing its intention to scale back its massive QE
                                                                                                monetary experiment early in 2013. In reaction, U.S.
                                                                                                Treasuries yields rose appreciably over the first half of
               5                                                                                the year only to partially fall back again in September,
                        U.S.                                                                    as the Fed surprised markets by deciding not to
                        Saudi Arabia
                        Russia                                                                  “taper” after all. That decision largely stemmed from
               0
                                                                                                the potential economic risks associated with the
               1990                                       2011    2015      2020        2025    looming government shutdown in October and to a
                                                                                                lesser extent, softness in some leading indicators at
               Note: Figures included crude and liquids   Source: International Energy Agency
                                                                                                the time. It must be pointed out, however, that the
                                                                                                Fed’s decision not to taper in September was less
Peace in Washington for now                                                                     important than the rise in rates that ended up taking
                                                                                                place in anticipation of it. It is clear that the market is
As the elements of a sustained recovery were falling                                            preparing for a sustained period of higher rates which
into place in 2013, political bickering in Washington                                           is why the retrenchment in September did not fully
concerning funding disagreements remained a key                                                 unwind the initial increases. This is understandable
stumbling block for the U.S. economy. In fact, last                                             since the market has not grappled with a sustained
October’s politically-motivated two week government                                             period of rising rates in over 30 years.
shutdown directly shaved a few percentage points
off Q4 growth and just as importantly, slowed down                                              For this reason, a major emerging theme for investors
the economy’s momentum by once again damaging                                                   over the next several years will be how the removal
confidence among business and consumers.                                                        of the Fed’s excess monetary stimulus plays out. With
                                                                                                the transition to new Fed Chair Janet Yellen complete
Fortunately, a degree of fiscal peace was brokered                                              and risks of another government shutdown over for
in Washington in the waning days of 2013 as                                                     now, the Fed finally had a green light to announce
both Houses agreed to end debate on budget                                                      that it would scale back asset purchases, but only by
agreements. The deal reverses a portion of spending                                             a modest $10 billion starting in January of this year.
cuts planned for the next two years, suggesting that                                            Since the move was largely priced in by markets and
the federal government will be less of a drag on                                                the Fed explicitly stated its intention to keep financial
economic growth going forward. It also thankfully                                               conditions accommodative, long term interest rates
means that for the time being, partisan bickering will                                          have, so far, only moved up modestly.
not derail the U.S. economy. In fact, even though
there is still uncertainty around the statutory debt                                            The Fed similarly made it clear that any changes to
limit (which was not part of the budget deal and                                                its current zero-interest rate policy (ZIRP) for short
which will need to be extended again in February),                                              rates are not imminent. For example, the threshold to
politicians have assured the public that they will not                                          guide the policy target rate requires a decline in the
use the debt ceiling as a bargaining tool.                                                      unemployment rate “well past” 6.5% and inflation to
                                                                                                run closer to 2%. With inflation still stuck at the low

                                                                                                                                 Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP   | 13
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

  end of the Fed’s comfort range (the core personal                                                the yield curve will continue to be anchored by very
  consumption expenditure (PCE) price index – the                                                  low short term rates in support of a still tentative
  Fed’s favorite measure of inflation – has been running                                           recovery and low expected overall inflation. As such,
  at less than 1% throughout 2013) and unemployment                                                overall monetary conditions should remain very
  still hovering above 7%, it’s clear that the U.S. central                                        accommodative over the next two years.
  bank has little motivation to start hiking its policy
  rate anytime soon. In fact, most forecasters do not                                              This is good news especially for the U.S.’s fragile
  anticipate any movement on the short end of the                                                  housing market. Although the basic fundamentals
  yield curve until at least late 2015 or possibly into                                            supporting the U.S. housing recovery remain
  2016 based on the Fed’s forward guidance.                                                        intact (for example, the overhang of unsold homes
                                                                                                   has almost been completely worked off, housing
                                                                                                   construction is still running well below expected
  Tapering should not derail economy                                                               household growth and house prices have stabilized),
                                                                                                   the swift increase in mortgage rates last year reduced
  In response to ongoing efforts by the Fed to unwind
                                                                                                   refinancing demand and sharply eroded housing
  its extraordinary monetary stimulus, forecasters
                                                                                                   affordability (See Fig. 2.6). Fortunately, the current
  expect long term interest rates to continue drifting
                                                                                                   level of housing affordability is still very attractive
  higher but only by about 100bps over the next two
                                                                                                   relative to history owing in part to the sharp
  years - see the Debt Market section in Chapter 3 for
                                                                                                   correction in house prices since the bubble collapsed.
  more details. This subdued pace is largely because
                                                                                                   Consequently, there remains a wide buffer to absorb
                                                                                                   moderately higher rates going forward.

  Fig. 2.6                                                                                         Of course, it remains anyone’s guess how unwinding
  U.S. Housing Affordability Index*                                                                the Fed’s bold monetary experiment ultimately plays
                                                                                                   out over the longer run given the lack of historical
         250                                                                                       precedent to draw upon. Rather than “moderate”
                                                                                                   and “gradual” increases, the potential path for
         200                                                                                       interest rates could become far more volatile, moving
                    More affordable                                                                in fits and starts, particularly if there are any miss-
         150                                                                                       steps in Fed communication along the way. Needless
Index*

                                                                                                   to say, if interest rates do move up too sharply,
         100
                                                                                                   especially in the near term, there is a high probability
                                                                                                   that it would fully derail the burgeoning U.S. recovery,
                    Less affordable
          50
                                                                                                   mostly by damaging psychology and causing sharp
                                                                                                   price declines in real estate, stocks and other financial
           0
                                                                                                   assets. On the other hand, there is a risk that the Fed
               81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13                                  could fall behind the curve as prolonged low rates
          Source: NAR                                                                              fuel asset price bubbles and raises the possibility
          Note: *Value of 100 means that a family with the median income has exactly enough
          income to qualify for a mortgage on a median-priced home. An index above 100 signifies   of runaway longer term inflation. Either way, the
          that family earning the median income has more than enough income to qualify for a
          mortgage loan on a median-priced home, assuming a 20 percent down payment                road back to ‘normal’ is likely to be anything but
                                                                                                   predictable.

  14 |         Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
Economic Outlook                          2
 Canada
 Slow but stable growth                                                                         Although it was able to admirably rely on its domestic
                                                                                                sector to steer it out of the largest downturn the
 Canada’s economy has cooled down significantly over                                            world has seen since the Great Depression, Canada
 the past two years. After increasing by just 1.7% in                                           is simply not able to do this indefinitely. It ultimately
 2012, Canadian real GDP was hard pressed to do any                                             requires support from external demand for its
 better in 2013. As a result, Canada has gone from                                              economy to grow at its full potential. Fortunately, the
 the top of the advanced world’s growth charts in the                                           world and specifically the U.S., finally appears ready
 years immediately following the Great Recession,                                               to lend a hand.
 to the middle of the pack. With the U.S. economy
 picking up momentum, Canada is also lagging behind                                             The source of Canada’s current economic weakness
 its neighbour to the south for the first time in several                                       remains the same. Exports have gone almost nowhere
 years.                                                                                         in the past two years (see Fig. 2.7) and factory output
                                                                                                continues to be very weak, largely in response to
 After a good run, it may be tempting to focus on just                                          what was an overvalued currency and sluggish global
 how sluggish the Canadian economy has become. But                                              demand. But another developing factor has been the
 it is important to put this situation into perspective.                                        relative slowdown of sectors that were previously at
 Canada has a fundamentally small open economy.                                                 the heart of Canada’s outperformance. For example,
                                                                                                resource extraction, especially base and precious
                                                                                                metals mining, has cooled off markedly given the
Fig. 2.7                                                                                        deceleration in emerging market demand for these
Canadian Real Domestic Demand & Exports                                                         commodities. This has directly softened net national
                                                                                                income growth.
               15
                                                                                                Canada’s important energy sector is also confronting
               10                                                                               major structural challenges. In the wake of its shale
                                                                                                energy revolution, the U.S. no longer requires as
Y/Y % Change

                5                                                                               much natural gas imports from Canada as it once
                                                                                                did. Although Canada continues to be a key exporter
                0
                                                                                                of oil to the U.S., the discount on Canadian oil from
               -5                                                                               international prices has widened considerably in the
                                                                                                past two years owing to the growing mid-continent
           -10
                    Exports                                                                     glut of oil caused by insufficient southbound pipeline
                    Domestic Demand                                                             capacity. While energy production has picked up as of
           -15
                    91   93   95   97   99     01    03    05    07    09    11 13E 15F
                                                                                                late 2013, discounts on Canadian oil remain, posing
                                                                                                some long term challenges for oil producers and
                                                                                                complicating the task of government and corporate
                                             Source: Statistics Canada, Forecast TD Economics
                                                                                                budgeters in provinces (mainly Alberta) that depend
                                                                                                heavily on oil revenue. This cyclical but also partly

                                                                                                                                Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP   | 15
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

structural moderation in commodity performance                             second half of 2013 and were trending at above-
is a major reason why the economic gulf between                            normal levels again. Strength was especially apparent
Canada’s resource-dependent western provinces and                          in Canada’s two most expensive markets – Toronto
the rest of the country has eased, with the disparity                      and Vancouver – where house price growth has
likely to remain narrower than during the previous                         re-accelerated.
decade.
                                                                           New residential construction also continues to
                                                                           grow above household formation rates, with more
Housing to the rescue….again                                               than 50,000 condo units now under construction
                                                                           in Toronto – an all-time high for the city (see Fig.
Amidst the on-going weakness on the external side
                                                                           2.8). With moderating job gains in other sectors,
of its economy, Canada has had to keep relying on
                                                                           the booming residential market has helped to make
domestic demand to support growth. But with federal
                                                                           construction a major driver of the labour market, not
and provincial governments tightening their purse
                                                                           just in Toronto but across the rest of the country too.
strings (most are on track to balance their books next
year) the burden continues to fall on other parts of                       There are certainly solid fundamental reasons behind
the domestic economy. Consumers are still stepping                         the resilience of Canada’s housing market including
up where needed. While core retail sales have cooled                       strong immigration, foreign investors looking for a
over the past two years, household spending on big-                        safe haven to park their capital and a growing echo
ticket items such as cars remains strong, driven by                        boomer population. But a rush to secure financing
extremely attractive financing rates.                                      amidst rising mortgage rates last summer was likely
                                                                           the main catalyst behind the resurgence of housing
Home buying did cool off appreciably in late 2012
                                                                           activity. As rates moderately rise over the forecast
owing to stricter mortgage rules imposed by the
                                                                           horizon, consumer spending and housing activity will
federal government, but it has since reignited. Home
                                                                           simply have limited capacity to carry on growing at
sales increased by double digit levels during the
                                                                           outsized rates.

                                                                           To help pay down their record high debt levels,
Fig. 2.8                                                                   households have already begun to reign in
Toronto CMA Apartment Starts                                               discretionary spending. And with income growth
                                                                           barely keeping pace with home prices, stressed
        60,000                                                             housing affordability levels in Canada’s major cities
                                                                           are likely to deteriorate further as mortgage rates
        50,000                                                             nudge higher and CMHC (the country’s major insurer
                                                     5 Year Average        of high ratio mortgages) limits its insurance in-force.
        40,000
                                                                           This will likely weigh on home sales, home prices
Units

                                               10 Year Average
        30,000
                                                                           and homebuilding particularly among condos in
                                        Long Term Average
                                                                           Toronto. But the extent of the adjustment in Canada’s
        20,000                                                             overall housing market remains uncertain. An optimal
                                                                           outcome would be for income growth to increase
        10,000                                                             faster than home prices owing to stronger job and
                                                                           wage growth outside of the construction sector. This
            0                                                              would allow housing valuations and overall activity
                 73 76 79 81 84 87 90 93 96 98 01 04 07 10 13
                                                                           to normalize before interest rates do. For now, this
                                                            Source: CMHC   “soft landing” for Canada’s housing market remains a
                                                                           forecast rather than a fact.

16 |      Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
Economic Outlook                           2
                                 Shifting growth drivers                                                                          Barring another shock, the burgeoning recovery in
                                                                                                                                  the U.S. will also go a long way to improving the
                                 With little capacity left from consumers and                                                     outlook for Canadian business investment. Outside
                                 government, economic drivers in Canada need to                                                   of robust spending on non-residential development,
                                 shift towards exports and business investment to                                                 much of Corporate Canada has fallen into a slump
                                 sustain future growth. These sectors have traditionally                                          with capital investment and private sector hiring
                                 been the main engines of the Canadian economy,                                                   decelerating significantly in 2013. While this is partly
                                 but have been held back in recent years by both an                                               due to weaker corporate profit growth, especially
                                 overvalued Canadian dollar and the depth of the U.S.                                             in Canada’s resource patch, it’s also simply due to
                                 recession. Fortunately, sustained improvements in the                                            a lack of confidence. Unlike consumers, Canadian
                                 U.S. economy should result in greater demand for                                                 businesses have excellent balance sheets and sit
                                 Canadian exports going forward.                                                                  on stockpiles of cash. Yet outside of the real estate
                                                                                                                                  sector, businesses have been cautious to deploy
                                 A weaker currency should also help. The loonie has                                               capital given the instability they have seen in the
                                 moved into a lower, but more fairly valued range of                                              rest of the world. The anticipated turnaround of the
                                 90 – 95 U.S. cents, and will likely remain there over                                            global economy and especially the U.S. should help
                                 the next 24 months owing partly to softer commodity                                              to unleash this pent-up corporate demand in Canada,
                                 prices (see Fig. 2.9). This will make Canadian exports                                           particularly among the numerous U.S. branch offices
                                 more attractively priced in the U.S. and should                                                  largely clustered in the Greater Toronto area.
                                 especially improve the fortunes of the beleaguered
                                 manufacturing heartland in Ontario and Quebec. But
                                 any sustained improvement in Canada’s trade picture                                              BoC removes its tightening bias
                                 also requires enhancements to Canadian productivity
                                                                                                                                  When the Canadian economy quickly recovered
                                 as well as export diversification into emerging
                                                                                                                                  from the Great Recession more than three years
                                 markets that are growing faster than the U.S. Much
                                                                                                                                  ago, the Bank of Canada was one of only a handful
                                 more progress is required on both of these fronts.
                                                                                                                                   of central banks to initiate rake hikes to remove
                                                                                                                                   excess monetary stimulus. Despite its inactivity
                                     Fig. 2.9                                                                                      since September 2010, the Bank’s tightening bias
                                     Bank of Canada Commodity Price Index & C$                                                     remained in place and was a major factor pushing
                                                                                                                                   Canada’s currency into overvalued territory over the
                                                                                                                                   past few years.
Commodity Price Index (1972 = 100)

                                     1000        Commodity Price Index (LHS)                                   1.2

                                      900
                                                 CAD (RHS)                                                                         But weakening growth has opened up pockets of
                                                                                                               1.1
                                                                                                                                   slack in Canada’s economy and reduced business
                                      800
                                                                                                               1.0
                                                                                                                                   pricing power. Along with significant price
                                                                                                                     U.S. Cents

                                      700                                                                                          competition in the retail sector, Canada’s inflation
                                      600                                                                      0.9                 rate has consequently slipped below the Bank of
                                      500
                                                                                                                                   Canada’s 2% target range in 2013, sticking closer
                                                                                                               0.8                 to 1% for well over a year. This “disinflation” finally
                                      400
                                                                                                                                   forced the Bank to remove its tightening bias
                                                                                                               0.7
                                      300                                                                                          last October. With economic growth in Canada
                                      200                                                                      0.6                 expected to improve this year but still come up
                                            00     02      04     06      08      10      12      14F                              short of its potential, the Bank is unlikely to return
                                                                                                                                   to a tightening bias until at least 2015 as economic
                                                                Source: Bank of Canada; C$ Forecast: TD Economics                  momentum eventually picks up on the back of the
                                                                                                                                   U.S. recovery.

                                                                                                                                                                   Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP   | 17
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

 Fig. 2.10
 Unemployment Rates By Country

              10
                      Canada
                      United Kingdom
               9
                      United States

               8
Percent (%)

               7

               6

               5

               4

               3
                   2000      2001      2002   2003   2004   2005   2006    2007   2008    2009   2010         2011        2012         2013

                                                                                                        Source: IMF; Shaded Area is Recession

 This change in the Bank of Canada’s tune, especially                     than other countries given its comparatively healthy
 at a time when the Federal Reserve is beginning to                       institutions and limited structural impediments.
 remove excess stimulus in its economy, has pulled                        For example: Canada’s fiscal situation remains far
 previously strong international capital flows out of                     more manageable than other developed countries,
 Canada. This is another force putting downward                           especially the U.S.; the eventual normalization
 pressure on the loonie. In fact, with inflation running                  of monetary policy in Canada carries fewer
 low and potentially slipping below 1% in the                             complications than other countries because the
 upcoming year, there is now even a case to be made                       Bank of Canada never engaged in an expansion
 for a rate cut. However, the Bank is unlikely to go                      of its balance sheet through QE; at 6.9% in late
 there just yet, partly in fear of stoking the housing                    2013, Canada’s unemployment rate is much closer
 market again.                                                            to its pre-recession levels and full employment
                                                                          potential than other developed countries (see Fig.
                                                                          2.10); and Canada’s demographic situation remains
 Bottom line
                                                                          comparatively healthy with a younger and faster
 No doubt, the next several years will be a tricky                        growing urban population than most other developed
 period for Canada as it migrates from domestic led                       countries. All told, these factors suggest that Canada
 growth and unwinding imbalances in its household                         should remain a bastion of stability among global
 sector, to leveraging off the better growth prospects                    economies over the long term even if its cyclical
 in the rest of the world. But making the long term                       outperformance in real GDP growth may have come
 transition to “normal” should be easier for Canada                       to an end. •

 18 |          Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

         White Oaks Mall, London, ON
(owner: Prime Canadian Property Fund)
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

Building
Sun
20 | Life
     BentallName,
            Building, City, State
                         Montréal,
             Kennedy (Canada) LP  Ownership
                                   QC
Real Estate & Capital Markets                                                      3

Investment Summary
The Canadian IPD property index posted a robust total return of 12.7% in the
twelve months ending Q3 2013. Although the performance of this benchmark
                                                                                                                          “Compressing cap
index for direct property investment in Canada has eased over the past                                                     rates have been a
year, it remains above its ten year average of 11.5%. As of Q3 2013, direct
property has broadly outperformed other Canadian asset classes including                                                  dominant driver of
bonds, Canadian equities and REITs. And unlike their relative economies,                                                  real estate returns,
direct property investments in Canada have also narrowly outperformed their
U.S. counterpart as the U.S. NCREIF Property Index (NPI) returned 11% in                                                    but its positive
the twelve months to Q3 2013. To put this into context, Canadian IPD index
returns have been higher than the U.S. NPI in eight of the past twelve years.
                                                                                                                           impact is fading.”

Capital appreciation continues to drive IPD returns
Capital appreciation remained a key driver of direct property investments in
Canada but its impact is narrowing. For example, the twelve month change
in capital values for standing properties in the IPD index was +6.8% as of Q3
2013, down from +8.4% a year earlier. Meanwhile, income yields continued to
compress and were 5.5% as of Q3 2013, down from 5.9% the year before.

A decomposition of the IPD’s return indicates that
the valuation effect (ie., the value gain arising from                         Fig. 3.1
compressing cap rates) accounted for a majority                                Decomposition of IPD Canada Returns
of the capital appreciation over the twelve months
ending Q3 2013, with an increase of 5.3%. This                                              25
was 40 bps higher than during the same period in                                            20
2012. The other component of capital appreciation,
                                                                                            15
net operating income (NOI) growth, increased by
                                                                              Percent (%)

1.5% in the twelve months to September 2013,                                                10

a substantially slower pace than the 3.5% annual                                             5
increase over the same period in 2012. Slower NOI
                                                                                             0
growth was therefore entirely responsible for the
softer pace of capital appreciation in Canadian IPD                                         -5
                                                                                                   Valuation Effect
index (see Fig. 3.1).1                                                                  -10        NOI Growth (y/y)
                                                                                                   Income Yield
                                                                                        -15        Total Return

1                                                                                                00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
  Although the U.S. NPI saw weaker capital growth than the Canadian IPD
index, it outperformed in terms of NOI growth (+4.1% in the twelve months                                 Note: Twelve Months To Third Quarter Of Every Year
                                                                                                                        Source: IPD Canada, Bentall Kennedy
to September 2013). This outperformance is more consistent with the recent
pattern of economic growth in the two countries last year.

                                                                                                                                Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP    | 21
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

   Although the positive valuation effect from                                                              see better income yields than other property types
   compressing cap rates remained a dominant driver of                                                      (6.4%), total performance lagged at 10.3% largely
   capital growth in the Canadian IPD, it is important to                                                   because of comparatively weaker capital appreciation
   keep in mind that the index is subject to appraisal lag.                                                 owing to tepid NOI growth.
   For example, less than half of the IPD portfolio was
   re-valued as of Q3 2013. However, as we explain in                                                       Meanwhile, household-driven property types such as
   subsequent sections, cap rates for institutional quality                                                 retail and residential, posted the highest total returns
   real estate appeared to have stabilized by mid-2013                                                      in the IPD index as of Q3 2013, at 14.3 % and 13.9%
   in response to higher long term interest rates. As                                                       respectively. The retail sector was buoyed mainly by
   such, Q4 2013 returns (which have not been released                                                      robust valuation increases while net operating income
   as of publication time) are likely to be more telling.                                                   (NOI) growth was a major driver of residential returns.

   In terms of performance by property type, those
                                                                                                            Transaction volumes remain elevated
   sectors driven predominantly by the business cycle –
   office and industrial – were laggards in the Canadian                                                    The Canadian real estate investment market remained
   IPD index last year (see Fig. 3.2). Office returns eased                                                 strong in 2013 with year to date transactions reaching
   to 11.9% in the twelve months to September 2013,                                                         $20.2 billion as of the third quarter. This is only $2
   4.8 percentage points lower than for the same period                                                     billion behind the same period in 2012 with full year
   a year earlier. Weaker capital growth was largely                                                        2013 numbers on track to be the third best on record
   responsible for this with both valuation effects and                                                     (see Fig. 3.3 below). It should be noted, however, that
   NOI growth weakening compared to the same period                                                         volumes fell 26.6% quarter-over-quarter in Q3 2013.
   in 2012. Although industrial returns continued to

 Fig. 3.2                                                                                                 Fig. 3.3
 Decomposition of Returns by Property Type - 2013 Q3                                                      Investment Activity By Asset Type

              25                                                                                                         35
                                                                                                                                      Hotel         Industrial
              20                                                                                                                      Land          Office
                                                                                                                         30
                                                                                                                                      Multi-Res     Year End Forecast
              15                                                                                                                      Retail
                                                                                                                         25
              10
Percent (%)

                                                                                                          Billions ($)

                                                                                                                         20
               5
                                                                                                                         15
               0
                                                                                                                         10
               -5
                        Valuation Effect
                        NOI Growth (y/y % ch.)                                                                            5
              -10
                        Income Yield
                        Total Return
              -15                                                                                                         0
                            Retail          Residential               Office           Industrial                             2007   2008    2009       2010      2011        2012       2013
                                                                                                                                                                                         YTD
                    *Twelve Months To Third Quarter Of Every Year   Source: IPD Canada; Bentall Kennedy                                                        Source: CBRE; RealNet and Realtrack

 22 |           Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
Real Estate & Capital Markets                                 3
                                                                                                           fact, pension funds/advisors, private equity (whose
         Fig. 3.4                                                                                          capital is often directly from pension funds and other
         Canadian Real Estate Purchaser Profile                                                            institutional investors) and private Canadian buyers
                                                                                                           (some of which can include pension funds) accounted
         100                                                                                               for just over 70% of transaction activity as of year
               90
                                                                                                           to date Q3 2013. This level of combined activity is
               80
                                                                                                           more in-line with the level of involvement this group
               70
                                                                                                           had prior to the financial crisis. For reasons we will
                                                                                        Foreign Investor
                                                                                                           outline later, we think pension funds and other private
Perecent (%)

               60                                                                       Institutional
                                                                                        REIT/REOC          institutional investors will continue to dominate
               50                                                                       Pension Fund/
                                                                                        Advisors           Canadian investment activity in the near term.
               40
                                                                                        Private Equity*
                                                                                        Private Canadian
               30
                                                                                        Investor*
                                                                                                           Foreign investors also saw an increasing, albeit still
               20                                                                                          minor, presence in the Canadian market in 2013. As
               10                                                                                          we noted in last year’s Perspective, foreigners have
                0                                                                                          acknowledged the attractive qualities that make
                       2007     2008     2009      2010     2011     2012       2013
                                                                               Q3/YTD                      Canada a good place to invest. But because property
                    Source: CBRE, RealNet Inc.                                                             values have continued to grow in Canada compared
                    * Note: May include pension funds and other institutions
                                                                                                           to declining values in some of their home countries,
                                                                                                           a number of foreigners have simply become net
                                                                                                           sellers of Canadian real estate. As momentum in
       This marks a significant deceleration in the pace of                                                the global economy picks up and the value of their
       activity going into the second half of the year and                                                 domestic portfolios stabilize, however, we think
       broadly coincided with the almost 100bps increase in                                                foreign demand may become incrementally more
       long term interest rates during the period.                                                         pronounced going forward.

       Another noticeable turning point by mid-year was in
       underlying purchaser activity. Specifically, acquisitions                                           Cap rates bifurcate
       by REIT/REOCs slowed dramatically in the second
       half of 2013, with the sector only accounting for 7.5%                                              Canadian cap rates generally remained stable in
       of the volume in Q3 2013. This compares to more                                                     2013, albeit last year’s interest rate increases ushered
       than 30% of deals done annually over the previous                                                   in a modest bifurcation in underlying pricing trends.
       two years (see Fig. 3.4). As discussed in more detail in                                            Cap rates for top-tier, institutional-quality core
       the Public Equity section, the pullback in investment                                               properties continued to trade at record lows with
       activity by the REITs was largely triggered by falling                                              the bid remaining deep. On the other hand, a more
       share prices as interest rates rose last year. While it’s                                           cautionary view of pricing for properties in non-
       hard to count them out given their appetite over the                                                primary markets and/or those deemed to be of lower
       last decade, we believe there are compelling reasons                                                or less favourable quality appears to have emerged,
       why the Canadian REIT sector could take a back-seat                                                 largely driven by the REIT sector pullback. Based on
       role in transactions this year.                                                                     investor trend surveys, cap rates for these properties
                                                                                                           increased by 10-25 bps, on average, between Q1 and
       While REITs recoiled, pension funds as well as other                                                Q3 2013.
       private investors came back to the fore in 2013. In

                                                                                                                                           Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP   | 23
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

Fig. 3.5                                                                                       Fig. 3.6
Downtown vs. Suburban A Office Cap Rates                                                       Spread (Bps)

              11                                                                 Downtown      120
                                                                                                          Historical Average
                                                                                 Suburbs
              10                                                                               100

              9
                                                                                                80
Percent (%)

               8
                                                                                                60
               7
                                                                                                40
               6

               5                                                                                20

               4                                                                                 0
                    02    03    04     05       06   07   08   09    10     11     12    13          02     03    04    05     06   07   08   09    10    11    12     13

                                                               Source: CBRE, Bentall Kennedy                                                  Source: CBRE, Bentall Kennedy

 The diverging pricing trend is especially noticeable in                                       relative to its competitors and allowed REITs to even
 the office sector where cap rates for suburban office                                         become active bidders of larger institutional-quality
 properties have generally remained elevated because                                           properties, which they rarely transacted in historically.
 of expectations of future earnings weakness while                                             However, last year’s higher interest rates reduced
 cap rates for downtown properties have compressed                                             this advantage. As a result, the REIT bid faded across
 significantly over the past three years due to robust                                         all asset classes and types, but most notably in the
 expectations of earnings growth. As Fig. 3.5 and 3.6                                          mid-market where REITs have traditionally dominated
 illustrate, this has resulted in the widest spread on                                         transaction activity.
 record for this sector although the spread is unlikely
 to widen further in the near term given the recent                                            In contrast, demand for large core-type properties,
 stabilization of downtown property cap rates.                                                 product which is often coveted by institutional
                                                                                               investors such as pension funds, remained strong as
 While the “pricing divergence story” broadly reflects                                         capital flows from this group continued unabated.
 investor expectations of property performance, it                                             There are fundamental reasons why we think
 also reflects how underlying capital flows have been                                          institutional investors such as pension funds have
 impacted by last year’s increase in interest rates.                                           the lowest cost of capital again and consequently,
 For example, lenders have become more cautious                                                why capital from this group is likely to dominate
 underwriting secondary/tertiary markets with                                                  transactions in the near term.
 financing for non-primary markets and/or non-core
 properties becoming more costly and less available in
                                                                                               Pension funds increasing allocations to
 some instances (see Debt Market section).
                                                                                               real estate
 An even more noticeable impact was evident on the
                                                                                               The value of all assets under management for
 equity side. As we detail in the Public Equity section,
                                                                                               Canadian pension funds has grown significantly
 artificially low interest rates were a huge source of
                                                                                               since the Great Recession in 2009. A combination of
 support for listed REITs over the last few years. It
                                                                                               recovering market values and increased net savings
 provided the sector with a very low cost of capital

24 |              Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
Real Estate & Capital Markets                                                                3
have seen the market value of Canadian pension plan
assets (including RRSP’s) rise to just over $2.5 trillion             Fig. 3.7
in 2012, roughly a 9% increase from the year before.                  Canadian Pension Fund Investments in Real Estate

Canadian pension fund net investment directly in                      100,000                                                                                     9
                                                                                      Net Real Estate Investments - LHS
domestic real estate has moved in a similar growth                         90,000     % of Total Fund Net Assets - RHS                                            8
trajectory over the past three years. As Fig. 3.7
                                                                           80,000
shows, net real estate investment has increased from                                                                                                              7
                                                                           70,000
$61 billion in 2008 to over $90 billion by the end of

                                                            Millions ($)
                                                                                                                                                                  6

                                                                                                                                                                  Percent (%)
2012, an annualized growth rate of almost 10% per                          60,000
                                                                                                                                                                  5
year. This $90 billion in invested equity (which reflects                  50,000
                                                                                                                                                                  4
both increasing allocations and rising property                            40,000
values) represents a weighted average allocation to                        30,000
                                                                                                                                                                  3
real estate of 6.5% for all Canadian pension funds                                                                                                                2
                                                                           20,000
including those funds without any real estate (see
                                                                           10,000                                                                                 1
Table 3.1). If only those pension funds with real estate
are included, then the weighted average allocation                             0
                                                                                    93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
                                                                                                                                                                  0

increases to 8.2%.
                                                                                                      Source: Canadian Institutional Investment Network,
                                                                                                           Various Financial Statements, Bentall Kennedy
Not surprisingly, the ten largest pension plans
in Canada accounted for a majority (80%) of this
invested equity. Many of these large pension funds          markets in the mid-1990s, were able to accumulate
were “early adopters” of real estate investment             portfolios of some of the most iconic properties in
and through the dislocation of commercial property          Canada. These large pension funds now have the

   Table. 3.1
   Canadian Pension Fund Investments in Real Estate

                                                                                             FUND                 CANADIAN              % CANADIAN
                                                                                           ASSETS                 RE EQUITY             REAL ESTATE
   FUND SIZE (Net Assets)                                                                    ($MM)                    ($MM)

   BREAKDOWN OF CANADIAN PENSION FUND INVESTMENT
   Funds with Real Estate
   Top 10 Funds with Real Estate                                                           854,365                       72,514                           8.5
   Other Funds > $1B                                                                       224,061                       16,146                           7.2
   $100MM to $1B                                                                            25,641                         1,958                          7.6
   $0 to $100MM                                                                               1,715                           116                         6.8
   Funds with Real Estate                                                                1,105,781                       90,734                           8.2
   Funds without Real Estate                                                               289,398                               -                           0
   All Funds                                                                             1,395,179                       90,734                           6.5

                                                                                                      Source: Canadian Pension F und Directory, Bentall Kennedy

                                                                                                                     Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP        | 25
Perspective on Real Estate 2014 - Canada

Table 3.2
Canada’s Ten Largest Pension Funds - As of December 2012

                                                                                                                           RE Allocation
PENSION FUND                                                                SIZE $(MM)                        RE %1               $(MM)

CDP                                                                               176,200                      10.20                 17,972
CPP Investment Board                                                              161,600                      10.60                 17,130
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board                                              127,263                      16.78                 21,355
bcIMC**                                                                             99,600                     14.70                 14,641
Public Sector Pension Investment Board**                                            76,100                     12.40                   9,436
AIMCO*                                                                              69,700                     10.00                   6,970
Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS)                               60,767                     13.20                   8,021
Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan                                                  47,400                     11.00                   5,214
Ontario Pension Board                                                               18,991                     14.60                   2,773
Canada Post Corp.                                                                   16,744                       7.30                  1,222

Top 10 Total                                                                      854,365                      12.26               104,735
*As Of March 31, 2012 **As Of March 31, 2013                        Source: Canadian Institutional Investment Network, Various Financial Statements
1
    Allocation includes BOTH domestic & foreign holdings

highest average allocations to domestic real estate        correlations with traditional financial assets, providing
at 8.5% as of 2012. However, many large pension            greater diversification benefits across all asset classes,
funds have positions in foreign real estate too. When      thereby helping large institutions achieve a more
domestic and international real estate positions are       “market neutral” portfolio.
rolled up, Canada’s ten largest pension funds had
a weighted allocation to real estate of 12.3% at the       It is generally these structural factors (longer
end of 2012 (see Table 3.2) – more than double the         investment horizons, limited need for liquidity, low
exposure to this asset class only 8 years prior and        risk tolerance and low return hurdles) which explain
more than triple the dollar value of invested equity.      why pension funds typically have a cost of capital
                                                           advantage among real estate investors in Canada.
Where do these large pension funds go from here?           As noted in the Public Equity section, competing
Most are already close to their targeted levels            Canadian REITs were only able to achieve a lower cost
but many have considered further increasing their          of capital recently, thanks to the artificially-induced,
allocations to direct real estate, to as much as 20%.      historically low interest rates that arose following the
Cyclical developments like historically low interest       Great Recession. In other words, the REITs edge over
rates and heightened volatility in equity markets          pension funds in the investment market during the
are certainly driving part of this shift into private/     last few years was more of a cyclical development
alternative assets like direct real estate as pension      whose time may be coming to an end as interest
funds seek to “de-risk” their portfolios. But this is      rates grind higher.
not necessarily the main factor. A bigger reason is
more structural in nature. Non-listed asset classes
such as private real estate, infrastructure and other
                                                           Size dictates different approaches
alternatives are a natural fit for pension funds because   Armed with a low cost of capital and growing direct
of their long investment horizons and limited need         real estate targets, we expect that large pension
for liquidity. Non-listed asset classes also have lower

26 |      Bentall Kennedy (Canada) LP
Real Estate & Capital Markets                             3
funds will continue to be important players in the        led acquisitions in foreign lands were done in the last
Canadian real estate investment market going              three years.
forward. However, since these funds already control
some of the best real estate in the country, their        Smaller pension funds and other institutions,
strategies may be less about acquisitions and more        particularly those with little to no direct real estate,
about investing in what they own to ensure that it        have similar reasons to their larger counterparts
stays “best in class” as we have seen over the last       for increasing allocations to the asset class. Subject
decade. Along these lines and given robust existing       to their level of sophistication or relative scale,
pricing, investment may also increasingly include         deployment of their capital could be in the form of
build to core programs which allow these funds to         either direct investment or pooled funds.
add to their stable of “best in class” assets while
generating some alpha too. Whether property               Since it would be their first foray into real estate for
markets require this new supply is a different question   many of these smaller funds, we believe most are
and one that will be addressed in Chapter 4.              likely to invest domestically rather than abroad. On
                                                          this basis, should all small to mid-sized Canadian
 Alternatively, large pension funds have also             pension funds as well as endowments take their real
increasingly looked at “near-real estate” assets          estate allocations up to levels similar to the domestic
in Canada (self-storage, trailer-parks, farmland or       allocations of the top 10 pension funds in Canada,
timber) and/or improving regional diversification         the total amount of potential capital available for
by seeking real estate outside of Canada’s borders,       investment in real estate is estimated to be as much
often at more opportunistic yields. With regard to the    as $30 billion. This backstop of potential pension fund
latter, CBRE notes that over $53 billion in Canadian-     capital in Canada is substantial.

                                                                       Olympic Village Residential, Vancouver, BC
                                                                          (owner: Prime Canadian Property Fund)
You can also read