Water Conservation Report 2016-2017 - Sydney Water
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Table of contents Executive summary ...................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction and regulatory context .................................................................................... 13 1.1 Approval of the ELWC Methodology ............................................................................................... 14 Our five-year plan .................................................................................................................. 15 2.1 The value of water ............................................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 17 2.3 Projects in the Water Conservation Plan ........................................................................................ 22 2.4 Programs that have reached maturity ............................................................................................. 43 Development of the Water Conservation Plan .................................................................... 44 3.1 The ELWC Methodology ................................................................................................................... 45 3.2 Quantifying the ELWC ....................................................................................................................... 46 3.3 Development of the Water Conservation Plan................................................................................ 47 3.4 Stakeholder Consultation on the Water Conservation Plan ......................................................... 49 3.5 Alignment with the 2017 Metropolitan Water Plan ......................................................................... 50 Water efficiency in 2016-2017 ............................................................................................... 51 4.1 Water Use ........................................................................................................................................... 51 4.2 Efficiency Programs .......................................................................................................................... 57 4.3 Leak management ............................................................................................................................. 59 4.4 Water Recycling ................................................................................................................................. 61 Appendix 1 Our total water savings for 2016-17 .................................................................. 64 Appendix 2 Reporting Requirements.................................................................................... 65 Appendix 3 Levelised costs, assumptions and water savings ........................................... 66 Appendix 4 Valuing and comparing cost and benefits ........................................................ 70 Appendix 5 Correcting for Weather ...................................................................................... 72 Appendix 6 Calculating the Economic Level of Leakage .................................................... 74 Appendix 7 Estimating Leakage............................................................................................ 75 Appendix 8 Glossary.............................................................................................................. 77 Appendix 9 List of acronyms and units ................................................................................ 78 Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 2
Executive summary Introduction Each year, we report on how we conserve water in accordance with Section 3 of our Operating Licence 2015–2020. For the first time this is based on the Economic Level of Water Conservation (ELWC) methodology, approved by IPART in December 2016. This report outlines our Water Conservation Plan (WCP) for the next five years and how we prepared it using the new methodology. It also reports on the costs and water savings from our water conservation programs run in 2016-17. Development of the Water Conservation Plan The WCP describes Sydney Water's plans for water conservation over the next five years. Development of the WCP has been informed by the new ELWC methodology, as outlined below in Figure 0-1. It is important to note that not all the projects in the WCP are based purely on economic efficiency. Some of our water conservation activities are undertaken as commercial offerings, social programs, and to build and maintain capability. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 3
•Quantify the volume of water that would be saved over the life of the water conservation project Step 1 •Quantify and value costs over the life of the candidate project, including: •Design and implementation costs •Avoided and/or avoidable costs Step 2 •Any positive external (social and environmental) benefits •Calculate the levelised cost of the candidate project. Step 3 •Compare the levelised cost against the value of water, and only carry forward a project if the levelised cost is less than the value of water. Step 4 •Finalise the list of candidate projects and develop a draft Water Conservation Program. Step 5 Figure 0-1 ELWC methodology key steps The current value of water The ELWC methodology was by approved by IPART in December 2016. For this report, the short- run value of water was estimated based on dam levels at the start of January 20171. In future, we will align the value of water with our business planning and approval processes to ensure alignment of the program with budget and resources. At the start of January 2017, the values of water were: - Short-run value of water was $0.56 per kL - Long-run value of water was $2.04 per kL The period of time over which water savings are assumed to occur for a particular project determines the value of water against which the project will be evaluated. See Table 0-1. 1 Value from the first weekly verified storage report released in January 2017. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 4
Table 0-1 Duration of water savings benefits vs the value of water Duration of water saving benefits Value of water 5 years or less Short-run 6-19 years Intermediate (interpolated between long and short run values) 20 years or more Long-run Figure 0-2 Replacing leaking taps is part of our Waterfix program Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 5
Our Five-Year Water Conservation Plan Table 0-2 lists the projects that comprise our Water Conservation Plan for the five-year period commencing 1 July 2017. In addition to our ongoing and new water conservation projects, the plan includes projects that may be implemented at a later date depending on future dam levels, as well as several research and capability building initiatives. Full details of the projects are described in Section 2.3. Table 0-2 - Our Water Conservation Plan Projects Project status Project type Project Water efficiency Waterfix residential Water efficiency Waterfix strata Ongoing Water efficiency PlumbAssist Water efficiency Supporting and research and development projects Leakage Active Leak Detection Program To be implemented in Water efficiency Rainwater Tank Repair 2017-182 Water efficiency Council partnerships More viable with an increase in the value of Water efficiency D&BCS3 Online Monitoring water Water efficiency D&BCS4 Efficiency Audits Water efficiency Love Your Garden Our proposed 5-year WCP is based on the value of water and the ELWC methodology. The levelised cost of each project has been assessed where we have reliable information to estimate the costs, water savings and benefits (where they can be quantified) of individual projects. This is detailed in Appendix 3. Where projects are considered economically efficient at the current value of water, we have included them in our five-year plan. Our ongoing water conservation projects are our Active Leak Detection Program, Waterfix Residential and Waterfix Strata. The ELWC also includes one program (Rainwater Tank Repair) which we will initiate in 2017-18, subject to business case approval. 2 Subject to business case/funding approval 3 Developer and Business Customer Services 4 Developer and Business Customer Services Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 6
We may also run projects which conserve water for reasons other than water efficiency, such as commercial offerings, social programs for our customers in hardship, and research and development. These are detailed in Appendix 3. For example, we will continue our PlumbAssist program. It is not efficient at the current value of water, however we primarily undertake PlumbAssist as a regulated social program for our customers in hardship. Our Waterfix programs, on the other hand, are not only economically efficient, but a commercial offering for our customers. The projected water savings from projects which are economically efficient are added to calculate the ELWC in ML/day. Based on the current value of water, our ELWC for the next five years is 23.5 ML/day. Our total water savings are projected to be 23.7 ML/day. Year-by-year savings for each project are detailed in Table 0-2. Our actual level of investment in water conservation, and the amount of water savings that result, will change over time as circumstances evolve, including changes in the value of water. The ELWC is a forward-looking methodology, and we are not considering ongoing savings from projects implemented until now, including from our leakage program and our water recycling program. Figure 0-3 Irrigation with recycled water from Picton Water Recycling Plant Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 7
Table 0-3 Predicted water savings for our forward-looking 5-year WCP based on the current value of water Project type Project Potential water savings (ML)5 2017- 2018- 2019- 2020- 2021- 5-year Total 18 19 20 21 22 Economically efficient projects Efficiency Waterfix 10 20 30 39 49 148 residential6 Efficiency Waterfix 193 386 579 772 965 2,896 strata7 Efficiency Rainwater 17 34 51 69 86 257 Tank Repair8 Leakage Active Leak Detection 3,572 5,656 7,861 10,145 12,452 39,688 Program9 Total predicted ELWC water 3,792 6,096 8,521 11,025 13,552 42,986 ML savings (ML) ELWC (ML/day) 23.5 ML/day Projects we complete for reasons other than water efficiency Social PlumbAssist10 21.2 42.4 63.6 84.8 106.0 318 project Total potential water 3,814 6,139 8,584 11,110 13,658 43,304 ML savings (ML) Total potential water 23.7 ML/day savings (ML/day) 5 Including water savings benefits expected to last for multiple years. 6 Projections based on average recent data 7 Projections based on average recent data 8 To be implemented in 2017-18, subject to business case/funding approval 9 Projection of savings based on 2016-17 baseline, average leak rate of rise and subject to no change in internal policies. The savings are calculated in comparison to not implementing a leakage program. In previous years, reporting of the leakage program included savings from a baseline as of 2002. A new business case has been developed from 2016-17. Going forward we will be reporting against the 2016-17 baseline. Our total water savings from the program since 2002 will remain at approximately 20 billion litres per year. 10 Projections based on average recent data Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 8
Our WCP also includes a number of projects which we can implement if water becomes scarcer and the value of water rises. These are mature projects that have been completed or piloted during the millennium drought (2003-2009), and we estimate that future investment in these projects will result in efficient water savings if dam levels drop. These projects are listed in Table 2-3, and full details are in Section 2.3.3. Table 0-4 Programs we will implement if the value of water rises Program (subject to business case/funding Levelised Anticipated Annual Water savings approval) Cost (ML) Council partnerships $0.72 210.4 D&BCS 11Online Monitoring $1.29 22.8 D&BCS12 Efficiency Audits $3.50 136.9 Love Your Garden $12.45 42.2 The full list of our ongoing programs can be found in Section 2.3.1, and their levelised costs, assumptions and water savings are detailed in Appendix 3. This includes a range of activities that support the development of the WCP, 2017 Metropolitan Water Plan and water conservation projects, such as pilot trials of projects, demand analysis and research. These activities help us to target future effort and quantify potential water savings to inform levelised cost calculations. While there was an exhaustive assessment of projects during the millennium drought, new technologies and drivers may change the viability of projects we have previously assessed, or provide opportunities for new projects. These projects need to be piloted in order to determine the true costs and benefits prior to completing the ELWC calculations. Details of these projects can be found in Section 2.3.4. 11 Developer and Business Customer Services 12 Developer and Business Customer Services Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 9
Figure 0-4 A rain gauge can help you determine how much water your garden needs Our Water Conservation Plan is made up of three main elements: our water leakage, water efficiency, and recycled water programs. Our leakage program is the backbone of our five-year WCP. While this program is primarily completed for the purposes of water conservation, it also has significant reputational and asset maintenance benefits. We will adjust the scale of the leakage program annually in line with the value of water and the ELWC methodology. On the current value of water, the economically efficient level of water efficiency projects is limited. However, opportunities for these projects will increase as the value of water increases. We have not assessed our recycled water program using the ELWC methodology, nor included water savings from our current schemes in our projected water savings for the next five years. We consider these schemes to be past investments. While our recycled water program will continue to save approximately 13 billion litres of water a year, the ELWC is a forward-looking methodology and is not intended for considering current operational recycled water projects, nor water savings from past projects. Review of past recycling projects have generally shown that costs are greater than the value of water. We will continue to explore new technologies and methods of making recycled water more efficient. The 2017 Metropolitan Water Plan also acknowledged that there are currently policy, regulatory and pricing barriers that artificially constrain the use of recycled water when determined based on an integrated water cycle management approach. The Metropolitan Water Plan proposed an independent review of the barriers and enablers of recycled water and also proposed the three-year WaterSmart Cities program to explore opportunities for delivering drinking water, recycled water, wastewater and stormwater services to new communities in a more integrated, cost effective and sustainable way. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 10
We are actively seeking opportunities to leverage the contribution that recycled water can make within an integrated water cycle approach (for servicing growth in areas such as Greater Parramatta to the Olympic Peninsula, and Western Sydney, for example) through better quantifying avoided cost and externalities, seeking opportunities to leverage existing infrastructure, and exploring new servicing approaches (such as decentralised and precinct based approaches). The ELWC Methodology The ELWC methodology is designed to promote economically efficient investment in water conservation, including water efficiency, leakage and recycling. It evaluates whether the cost to society of a water conservation project is less than the value of water that it saves. If so, it is considered economically efficient. Our ELWC methodology is based on a marginal value framework, where investment in water conservation could increase until the cost of saving an extra volume of water is just equal to the cost of supplying an extra volume of water. Quantifying the ELWC Once we have determined if our projects are economically efficient (i.e. the levelised cost is less than the value of water), we calculate the ELWC. This is an estimate of the amount of water that could be conserved each year by viable projects, based on our economic assessment of costs and benefits across individual water conservation projects. We calculate the ELWC by adding the total amount of water that could be saved during the five-year program across all the economically viable and available projects and converting to an average ML/day basis. The ELWC for our program based on the January 2017 value of water is 23.5 ML/day. However, we also plan to continue some projects, such as PlumbAssist, which conserve water for other reasons. The ELWC 5-year WCP and ELWC methodology only considers new and ongoing water conservation programs. It does not consider ongoing savings from previously completed programs, even though these may be significant. 2016-17 Water Use and Water Conservation Program Total water use13 for 2016–17 was 557,807 million litres compared to 529,939 million litres in 2015–16. This includes water used by the residential sector, businesses, industry, irrigation and leaks. This amount is similar to total water use in 2003–04, when the population was around 20% lower than now and water restrictions were in place. On a per person basis water use continues to remain at a similar level to when Level 3 water restrictions were replaced with Water Wise Rules. Despite the warmer than average weather, average water use per person for 2016–17 was estimated to be 307 litres a day14. When corrected for weather impacts, average per person water demand reduces to 302 litres a day (Appendix 5). 13 Total water use includes potable water and unfiltered water provided for industrial use in the Illawarra. Recycled water is not included. 14 Observed demand not corrected for weather impacts. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 11
We estimate that we saved 11,091 ML in measurable water savings in 2016-17. Our efficiency program included PlumbAssist, Waterfix Residential and the new Waterfix Strata. Our leakage program saved 1,38715 million litres, and our ongoing recycled water projects saved 9679 million litres of water in 2016-17. A summary of our total costs and water savings from 2016-17 can be found in Appendix 1. Figure 0-5 — Active leak detection is a key part of maintaining low levels of leakage. 15 This is much lower than previous years as it is based on a 2016-17 baseline. In previous years, reporting of the leakage program included savings from a baseline as of 2002. A new business case has been developed from 2016-17. Going forward we will be reporting against the 2016-17 baseline. Our total water savings from the program since 2002 are 19,565 ML/year.. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 12
Introduction and regulatory context Each year, we report on how we conserve water in accordance with Section 3 of our Operating Licence 2015–2020. For the first time this is based on the Economic Level of Water Conservation (ELWC) methodology, approved by IPART in December 2016. In the past, obligations in Sydney Water’s Operating Licence regarding water conservation have been fixed and prescriptive. From 1995 we were required to achieve a per capita reduction of water use to 329 litres per person per day (LPD) by 2011. From 2011, we were required to ensure that water use did not exceed this limit. This approach was not dynamic in that it did not vary with our dam levels, which may not have always incentivised the most efficient water conservation investment decisions. The new methodology promotes economically efficient decisions in water conservation which can consider social and environmental costs and benefits in addition to the cost of the program and the water saved. It is also adaptable, meaning that we are prepared for a range of dam levels, demand conditions, and climatic factors. This report outlines our plan for the next five years and describes how we prepared it using the new methodology. It also reports on the costs and water savings from our water conservation programs run in 2016-17. Appendix 2 outlines how this report meets specific requirements in the Operating Licence Reporting Manual. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 13
1.1 Approval of the ELWC Methodology The ELWC was introduced in the Operating Licence 2015–2020, with the new requirements for water conservation, reproduced below: 3.2 Economic level of water conservation 3.2.1 By 1 November 2015, Sydney Water must submit to IPART (for IPART’s approval) a report outlining Sydney Water’s approach to, and principles for, developing a methodology for determining its economic level of water conservation, including (at a minimum) each of the following elements of water conservation: a) water leakage b) water recycling; and c) water efficiency (including demand management) 3.2.2 Once the approach and principles referred to in clause 3.2.1 are approved by IPART, Sydney Water must develop a methodology in accordance with the approach and principles. 3.2.3 By 31 December 2016, Sydney Water must obtain IPART’s approval for the Methodology. In 2015 the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) approved the approach and principles that Sydney Water used to develop a methodology to determine its Economic Level of Water Conservation (ELWC). An industry reference group including Hunter Water, the Metropolitan Water Directorate and Water NSW met periodically to provide guidance to the project. In April 2016 Sydney Water released an issues paper to seek feedback from stakeholders on the various methodology options. These were incorporated into the final report, as well as comments from a public forum held in October 2016 to consult with interested parties. The ELWC methodology was approved by IPART in December 2016. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 14
Our five-year plan This section outlines the projects included in the Water Conservation Plan. We undertake water conservation programs in three main areas: water efficiency, water leakage and water recycling . Water efficiency projects primarily aim to conserve water through efficient technologies, behaviour change, metering, voluntary use reduction and efficiency audits. Our leakage program is made up of operational projects completed by Sydney Water to reduce water leakage in our system. This may include proactive leak detection and repair, new technologies, and pressure reduction projects. Our water recycling program aims to reuse water, whether it be wastewater or stormwater. These projects can range from large scale wastewater recycling, to sewer mining to stormwater harvesting. These projects are considered to be water conservation projects when they reduce demand on our surface water supplies. When the levelised cost of a project is lower than the value of water, we will implement it, subject to business case for funding approval. We have included projects which are ongoing, as well as projects we can implement if water becomes scarcer. We have also included projects we need to pilot to be able to estimate costs and benefits. However, we also undertake some projects for reasons other than water conservation alone. These could be commercial offerings, social projects, or research projects. An explanation of these types of projects is in Appendix 3. 2.1 The value of water The ELWC methodology was approved by IPART in December 2016. For this report, the current short-run value of water was estimated based on dam levels as at the start of January 201716. Dam levels in early January 2017 were at 89.7%. The value of water is dependent on its scarcity, so a high dam level results in a low short run value of water. In future, we will align the value of water with our business planning and approval processes. The long run value of water, which is intended to reflect long term investment in infrastructure and supply, is not directly affected by dam storage levels. The long run value of water used for this report reflects the regulated retail price of water that will apply during the 2017-18 financial year. At the start of January 2017, the values of water were: - Short-run value of water was $0.56 per kL - Long-run value of water was $2.04 per kL 16 Value from the first weekly verified storage report released in January 2017. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 15
The period of time over which water savings are assumed to occur for a particular project determines the value of water against which the project will be evaluated. See Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Duration of water savings benefits vs the value of water Length of water saving benefits Value of water 5 years or less Short-run 6-19 years Intermediate 20 years or more Long-run Projects which fall into the Intermediate category will be assessed against a linear interpolation of the short- and long-run values of water. This is shown in Figure 2-1. Economic Level of Water Conservation 2017 - Value of Water $2.50 $2.00 $2.04 $1.94 Value of water ($ / kilolitre) $1.84 $1.74 $1.64 $1.55 $1.50 $1.45 $1.35 $1.25 $1.15 $1.05 $1.00 $0.95 $0.85 $0.75 $0.56 $0.65 $0.50 $- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Duration of water savings (years) Figure 2-1 - Short-run to Long-run values of water Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 16
2.2 Overview of the Water Conservation Plan Table 2-1 lists the projects that comprise our Water Conservation Plan for the five year period commencing 1 July 2017. In addition to our ongoing water conservation projects, the plan includes projects that may be implemented at a later date depending on future dam levels, as well as several research and capability building initiatives. Table 2-2 - Water Conservation Plan Projects Project status Project type Project Water efficiency Waterfix residential Water efficiency Waterfix strata Ongoing Water efficiency PlumbAssist Water efficiency Supporting research and development projects Leakage Active Leak Detection Program To be implemented in Water efficiency Rainwater Tank Repair 2017-1817 Water efficiency Council partnerships More viable with an increase in the value of Water efficiency D&BCS18 Online Monitoring water Water efficiency D&BCS19 Efficiency Audits Water efficiency Love Your Garden Our proposed 5-year WCP is based on the value of water and the ELWC methodology. The levelised cost of each project has been assessed where we have reliable information to estimate the costs, water savings and benefits (where they can be quantified) of individual projects. This is detailed in Appendix 3. Where projects are considered economically efficient at the current value of water, we have included them in our five-year plan. Our ongoing water conservation projects are our Active Leak Detection Program, Waterfix Residential and Waterfix Strata. The ELWC also includes one program (Rainwater Tank Repair) which we will initiate in 2017-18, subject to business case approval. We may also run projects which conserve water for reasons other than water efficiency, such as commercial offerings, social programs for our customers in hardship, and research and 17 Subject to business case/funding approval 18 Developer and Business Customer Services 19 Developer and Business Customer Services Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 17
development. These are detailed in Appendix 3. For example, we will continue our PlumbAssist program. It is not efficient at the current value of water, however we primarily undertake PlumbAssist as a regulated social program for our customers in hardship. Our Waterfix programs, on the other hand, are not only economically efficient, but a commercial offering for our customers. The predicted water savings from projects which are economically efficient are added to calculate the ELWC in ML/day. Based on the current value of water, our ELWC for the next five years is 23.5 ML/day. Our total water saving are projected to be 23.7 ML/day. Year-by-year savings for each project are detailed in Table 2-3. Our actual level of investment in water conservation, and the amount of water savings, will adjust over time as circumstances evolve, including changes in the value of water. The ELWC 5-year plan only considers new and ongoing water conservation programs. It does not consider ongoing savings from previously completed programs, even though these may be significant. Figure 2-2 The Love Your Garden Program includes advice on how and when to water your garden Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 18
Table 2-3 Predicted water savings for our forward-looking 5-year WCP based on the current value of water Project type Project Potential water savings (ML)20 2017- 2018- 2019- 2020- 2021- 5-year Total 18 19 20 21 22 Economically efficient projects Efficiency Waterfix 10 20 30 39 49 148 residential21 Efficiency Waterfix 193 386 579 772 965 2,896 strata22 Efficiency Rainwater 17 34 51 69 86 257 Tank Repair23 Leakage Active Leak Detection 3,572 5,656 7,861 10,145 12,452 39,688 Program24 Total potential ELWC water 3,792 6,096 8,521 11,025 13,552 42,986 ML savings (ML) ELWC (ML/day) 23.5 ML/day Projects we complete for reasons other than water efficiency Social PlumbAssist25 21.2 42.4 63.6 84.8 106.0 318 Project Total potential water 3,814 6,139 8,584 11,110 13,658 43,304 ML savings (ML) Total potential water 23.7 ML/day savings (ML/day) 20 Including water savings benefits expected to last for multiple years. 21 Projections based on average recent data 22 Projections based on average recent data 23 To be implemented in 2017-18, subject to business case/funding approval 24 Projection of savings based on 2016-17 baseline, average leak rate of rise and subject to no change in internal policies. The savings are calculated in comparison to not implementing a leakage program. In previous years, reporting of the leakage program included savings from a baseline as of 2002. A new business case has been developed from 2016-17. Going forward we will be reporting against the 2016-17 baseline. Our total water savings from the program since 2002 will remain at approximately 20 billion litres per year. 25 Projections based on average recent data Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 19
Our WCP also includes a number of projects which we can implement if the value of water rises. These are mature projects that have been completed or piloted during the millennium drought, and we estimate that future investment in these projects will result in efficient water savings if dam levels drop. These projects are listed in Table 2-3 and Section 2.3.3. Table 2-4 Programs we will implement if the value of water rises, subject to business case/funding approval Program Levelised Cost Anticipated Annual Water savings (ML) Council partnerships $0.72 210.4 D&BCS26 Online Monitoring $1.29 22.8 D&BCS27 Efficiency Audits $3.50 136.9 Love Your Garden $12.45 42.2 The full list of our ongoing programs can be found in Section 2.3.1, and their levelised costs, assumptions and water savings are detailed in Appendix 3. This includes a range of activities that support the development of the WCP, 2017 Metropolitan Water Plan and water conservation projects, such as pilot trials of projects, demand analysis and research. These activities help us to target future effort and quantify potential water savings to inform levelised cost calculations. While there was an exhaustive assessment of projects during the millennium drought, new technologies and drivers may change the viability of projects we have previously assessed, or provide opportunities for new projects. These projects need to be piloted in order to determine the true costs and benefits prior to completing the ELWC calculations. Details of these projects can be found in Section 2.3.4. 26 Developer and Business Customer Services 27 Developer and Business Customer Services Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 20
Our Water Conservation Plan is made up of three main elements: our water leakage, water efficiency, and water recycling programs. Our leakage program is the backbone of our five-year WCP. While this program is primarily completed for the purposes of water conservation, it also has significant reputational and asset maintenance benefits. We will adjust the scale of the leakage program annually in line with the value of water and the ELWC methodology. On the current value of water, the economically efficient level of water efficiency projects is limited. However, opportunities for these projects will increase as the value of water increases. We have not assessed our water recycling program using the ELWC methodology, nor included water savings from our current schemes in our projected water savings for the next five years. We consider these schemes to be past investments. While our recycled water program will continue to save approximately 13 billion litres of water a year, the ELWC is a forward-looking methodology and is not intended for considering current operational recycled water projects, nor water savings from past projects. Review of past recycling projects have generally shown that costs are greater than the value of water. We will continue to explore new technologies and methods of making recycled water more efficient. The 2017 Metropolitan Water Plan also acknowledged that there are currently policy, regulatory and pricing barriers that artificially constrain the use of recycled water when determined based on an integrated water cycle management approach. The Metropolitan Water Plan has proposed an independent review of the barriers and enablers of recycled water and also proposed the 3 year WaterSmart Cities program to explore opportunities for delivering drinking water, recycled water, wastewater and stormwater services to new communities in a more integrated, cost effective and sustainable way. We are actively seeking opportunities to leverage the contribution that recycled water can make within an integrated water cycle approach (for servicing growth in areas such as Greater Parramatta to the Olympic Peninsula, and Western Sydney, for example) through better quantifying avoided cost and externalities, seeking opportunities to leverage existing infrastructure, and exploring new servicing approaches (such as decentralised and precinct based approaches). Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 21
2.3 Projects in the Water Conservation Plan 2.3.1 Ongoing program Our Water Conservation Plan includes a number of current projects that we plan to continue. This section details these projects and their role in the plan. WaterFix Residential The residential Waterfix program allows customers to choose the type of plumbing service they need to improve water efficiency in the home, providing customers with a choice of services to suit their individual needs. This service includes replacing showerheads, toilets and taps, and repairing leaks by a qualified plumber. The program has been very successful since its inception in 1999. Initially offered as a subsidised service, since 2011 we have offered the service to residential customers at cost recovery rates. Costs to the customer vary, depending on the type of service selected. In 2016–17, the WaterFix service offered: • all types of tap and toilet leak repairs • installation of WELS (Water Efficiency Labelling Scheme) 3-star showerheads • installation of WELS 4-star dual flush toilets • installation of WELS 3-star flow regulating aerators or WELS 4-star in-body flow regulators. Initially the program was primarily designed to promote water efficient products in customers’ homes. However, a change in customers’ attitudes to water efficiency since the millennium drought means that the focus of the program has shifted to a leak identification and repair service. The size of the project every year is highly dependent on customer uptake. However, we service around 40028 customers per year, on average. Since 2011, we have serviced over 3200 customers, and we estimate that program has saved approximately 304 million litres of water. For the next five years, we predict that Waterfix residential will save an additional 9.729 million litres of water every year. These water savings are estimated to last up to 17 years after the service30. For this period of water savings benefits, the current value of water is $1.74. Because the program is currently run at commercial rates, the levelised cost for the residential WaterFix program is less than zero. This is below the value of water, and therefore economically efficient. Currently we only promote Waterfix through our website. However, because the levelised cost of the program is well below the current value of water, in 2017-18 we will investigate whether additional marketing sources will enable us to increase our water savings while ensuring that the program remains economically efficient. 28 Based on average number of customers for 2013/14-2016/17 29 Based on weighted average water savings for 2011/12 to April 2016 30 Based on seven years of full water savings and a 10% annual decay in savings thereafter. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 22
WaterFix Strata The WaterFix Strata program was introduced as a pilot in 2016 as an addition to the residential WaterFix program. We identify strata buildings with high water use using a unique benchmarking tool which provides a comparison of the water use of an apartment. Typical water use for an efficient apartment building is 200-300 litres per bedroom per day. We have identified that more than 20 of Sydney’s largest strata complexes have very high water use of greater than 600 litres per bedroom per day. However, with only a single meter serving the majority of Sydney’s residential strata buildings, the incentive for individual apartment dwellers is limited. To incentivise this, the WaterFix strata program is based on a performance guarantee. Under this agreement, the strata body pays no upfront costs, instead repaying costs of services with the savings achieved by WaterFix. That is, the water bill of the account is held static until the costs of the service are recovered; typically around three years. The project was started as an 11-building pilot program. The first year of the pilot, 2016-17, was successful, with significant water savings from the first building completed. We completed work in all 154 units. Like Waterfix Residential, these water savings are expected to last for up to 17 years after the work was completed. The ongoing pilot program aims to deliver the service to 10 Strata buildings in the 2017-18 financial year. This program is also run on a commercial basis, and the levelised cost is calculated to be less than $0.00. This is below the value of water at $1.74, and therefore economically efficient. If the second year of the pilot is also deemed successful, we anticipate that we will run this project for at least the next five years. Based on the pilot and additional buildings that have been assessed, we anticipate that this program will save an additional 193 million litres of water every year. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 23
PlumbAssist PlumbAssist provides a proactive, tailored water efficiency service for high use customers experiencing financial hardship. PlumbAssist is offered through our BillAssist program; customers having difficulties paying their bills are referred to BillAssist by the Sydney Water Contact Centre or external community service agencies. Other customers identified with high and/or long-term debt are proactively offered assistance by our BillAssist team. BillAssist staff offer customers case management and a range of assistance options. As part of the assistance package, staff do an initial plumbing assessment which includes a check for high water use or a sudden increase in use. Eligible customers with high water use or who cannot afford to fix essential plumbing services are then referred to PlumbAssist. PlumbAssist aims to rectify problems customers may have with: • high water use • wastewater systems • hot water systems. Plumbers may also: • fix tap and toilet leaks • replace taps • find and repair concealed leaks • replace inefficient toilets • replace failed hot water systems. PlumbAssist reduces water waste and the cost of future water bills, and alleviates financial stress for vulnerable customer groups. Since starting in 2011, 1404 customers have had a plumbing issue resolved through the PlumbAssist service. The range of services offered is similar to WaterFix, but the standard of plumbing fixtures prior to our visits is typically very poor meaning the potential for greater savings and costs per fitting installed is higher. PlumbAssist is a carefully targeted service for the most vulnerable households so it is difficult to predict customer uptake. However, on average, 170 customers per year will have an issue resolved through PlumbAssist31. Savings also vary significantly from house to house due to the variety of plumbing issues repaired through the program. We estimate that this program has saved over 501 million litres so far, and will continue for at least another five years, with anticipated annual water savings of 21.2 million litres per year. Like the Waterfix programs, water savings are estimated to last up to 17 years after the appointment. The PlumbAssist program has a levelised cost of $3.38. While this is above the value of water, which is $1.74 for a program with water-saving benefits of up to 17 years, this program is run primarily as a social program to help customers in hardship. Social benefits of the program include alleviating financial stress and ensuring that vulnerable customers have access to basic amenities. 31 Based on average numbers from 2013/14 to 2016/17 Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 24
These benefits are not easy to quantify; externalities have therefore not been reflected in the calculation of the levelised cost. However, our three residential water efficiency programs all offer similar services, and share program management resources. When considering the total costs and water savings of PlumbAssist and Waterfix Residential and Strata, the total levelised cost of the combined water efficiency program is approximately $0.06. As a total program, this is below the value of water at $1.74. Figure 2-3 We work with our partners to enable water sensitive cities of the future Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 25
Education Initiatives We invest in and support education programs that promote water efficiency – with a broader focus on the urban water cycle. Initiatives are guided by the Sydney Water Education Plan 2012–16. This Plan will be updated in 2017-18. We run educational tours at seven operational sites, which include water filtration, water recycling and wastewater treatment plants and an advanced water recycling plant. We also have a specially designed Water Recycling Education Centre at St Marys. Our tours promote responsible water use and efficiency and we engage with people from secondary schools, TAFE colleges, universities, technical and international delegations, and other key stakeholders. Every year, approximately 4,000 people participate in a treatment plant tour and presentation. About 2,000 people per year also visit the Water Recycling Education Centre to learn about recycling, sustainable water management and water recycling treatment technology and innovation. Figure 2-4 Students on a tour of the water recycling plant and education facility at St Marys Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 26
Regulatory measures Two external regulatory measures, implemented during the millennium drought, remain in place: the Water Efficient Labelling and Standards (WELS) scheme and the Building Sustainability Index (BASIX). Both measures continue to improve the water efficiency of homes. BASIX is a state-wide planning policy that sets water use and greenhouse emission targets for residential dwellings. BASIX aims to reduce the volume of drinking water used and greenhouse gas emissions produced by new dwellings and existing dwellings with extensions and alternations. WELS is a national scheme that involves mandatory water efficiency rating and labelling for a range of appliances and fittings. It also sets minimum water efficiency standards for some appliances, such as washing machines. Sydney Water worked closely with regulatory bodies during the millennium drought (2003-2009) to implement this legislation. Figure 2-5 Our network technicians assess reports of leaks and breaks and prioritise jobs to ensure we respond with the appropriate resources Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 27
Leakage management Sydney Water owns and maintains about 25,000 km of pipes that deliver water to customers. We also maintain the connections to customer properties. All pipe networks are vulnerable to leaks and breaks. Water mains leak or break for a number of reasons and age is usually not the determining factor. Many things can cause leaks, such as: • deteriorating joints and fittings • ground movement cracking pipes • changes in water pressure • changes in rainfall and temperature. Sydney Water implements a number of programs to reduce the likelihood of leaks and the amount of water lost when they happen. These programs include: • Active leak detection and repair. • Pressure management. • Optimised response times to repair leaks and breaks. • Improved flow metering. Leakage programs are justified and implemented based on the Economic Level of Leakage (ELL). The ELL aims to achieve a balance between keeping costs low for customers and reducing leakage levels. The ELL methodology is consistent with the ELWC methodology. However, while the ELL reflects the level of leakage from the system at the point where the cost of leak reduction activities equals the savings from reduced leakage, the ELWC methodology is used to determine the investment and volume of water savings (from a baseline level of leakage) that is economically efficient. We will update the forward-looking ELL on an annual basis in line with the value of water and the ELWC methodology. An explanation of the ELL methodology can be found in Appendix 6. The ELL for the 2017-18 period is estimated to be 108 ±1632 ML/day. The leakage program is also supported by our ongoing Pipe Renewal Program as part of our asset maintenance program. By replacing pipes that have reached the end of their life, this program aims to minimise leaks and breaks. Research is also being done on whether leaks lead to pipe breaks. If there is evidence to support this hypothesis, this research will inform the leakage program’s size and scope by allowing us to calculate the avoided costs of addressing leaks before they turn into breaks. Sydney Water has reduced breaks by 50% over the last 10 years. We monitor leakage on a quarterly basis and adjust our programs in response to these results. When we increase the amount of active leak detection in response to increased leakage there can be a delay of several months before there is a noticeable effect. Over the last four years we have aimed to manage to our target and provide value to customers. 32 In line with the uncertainty band. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 28
The active leak detection and response is a short-term program of less than five years, as the water savings achieved by active leak control would continue for a period after the program was stopped, but the savings will decay over time as new leaks emerge (or re-emerge). Approval for a five-year business case for the active leak detection program is underway. Based on the ELWC methodology, and the corresponding short-run value of water at the time ($0.56 a kilolitre), the efficient level of investment in reducing leaks was around $1.7 million a year. This is equivalent to water savings of around 9.8 ML a day, and a levelised cost of around $0.30 a kilolitre. Figure 2-6 To inspect for hidden leaks Sydney Water uses acoustic devices that pick up the noise water makes as it leaks from a pipe Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 29
Water Recycling Our water recycling program aims to reuse water, whether it be wastewater or stormwater. These projects can range from large scale wastewater recycling, to sewer mining to stormwater harvesting. These projects are considered to be water conservation projects when they reduce demand on our surface water systems. Recycled water can be used to: • water gardens, golf courses and parks • flush toilets • wash cars • fight fires. It can also be used for some industrial purposes and to supplement river flow in the Hawkesbury- Nepean River. We currently operate 23 recycled water schemes, including 15 irrigation schemes. However, we also provide recycled water for use at our own wastewater treatment plants. Our recycled water schemes currently produce approximately 42 billion litres a year. We calculate our water savings based on whether potable water would have been used for the intended purpose. This is approximately 13 billion litres annually. Details on our recycled water savings in 2016-17 can be found in Section 4.4. The ELWC is a forward-looking methodology. In future, we will proactively evaluate recycled water opportunities as part of an integrated water cycle management approach when planning recycled water services on our own sites, as well as recycled water services for customers. This approach is consistent with the concept of “one water” where we holistically consider all sources and end uses for water, and the benefits and costs of managing water, energy, and nutrients. Such an approach will ensure that we use the right water, of the right quality for the right purpose. Recycled water will be provided when: - it is economically efficient to do so, - it is in the interests of customers - Sydney Water can recover its capital and operating costs. In line with the ELWC methodology, assessments of economic efficiency can include avoided costs in water security and supply, wastewater transfer and treatment, nutrient management and other externalities where they can be adequately quantified. We will explore how our water servicing solutions can provide wider economic benefit and how this may be harnessed. We know that when we are not in drought surface water is a lower cost and lower energy intensity source of water, so planning for recycled water schemes will account for the variation in the need for, and value of, recycled water as a substitute for potable water. However, other benefits of recycled water such as reduced nutrient and flow impacts may be sustained on an ongoing basis. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 30
We will continue to explore new technologies and methods of making recycled water more efficient. Currently there are policy, regulatory and pricing barriers that artificially constrain the use of recycled water when determined based on an integrated water cycle management approach. The 2017 Metropolitan Water Plan proposed an independent review of the barriers and enablers of recycled water and also proposed the three-year WaterSmart Cities program to explore opportunities for delivering drinking water, recycled water, wastewater and stormwater services to new communities in a more integrated, cost effective and sustainable way. We are actively seeking opportunities to leverage the contribution that recycled water can make within an integrated water cycle approach (for servicing growth in areas such as Greater Parramatta to the Olympic Peninsula, and Western Sydney) through better quantifying avoided cost and externalities, seeking opportunities to leverage existing infrastructure, and exploring new servicing approaches (such as decentralised and precinct based approaches). Figure 2-7 - Saw tooth weir on the tertiary clarifier at the Rouse Hill Water Recycling Plant Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 31
Sewer mining Sewer mining, a specific form of recycling, is the process of tapping into a wastewater system, (either before or after the wastewater treatment plant), and extracting wastewater, which is then treated on-site and used as recycled water. There are currently eight sewer mining schemes operating in Sydney Water’s area of operations. These schemes are owned and operated by organisations including councils, golf clubs and commercial building owners. We support the provision of recycling by sewer mining projects in accordance with our sewer mining policy. Our objectives are to: • facilitate sewer mining by providing timely information, advice and responses to sewer mining enquiries and applications • encourage improved water efficiency and sewage management outcomes • ensure the operation of the sewerage system is not compromised • ensure that the extraction and use of sewage for sewer mining only exposes Sydney Water to business or legal risks that can be managed. Private onsite reuse schemes There are currently eight private onsite reuse schemes currently in operation. Recycled water is produced by capturing, treating and re-using wastewater from a site’s buildings or facilities. This includes Sydney Water’s head office building at 1 Smith Street, Parramatta. Recycled water volumes from these schemes are not reported to Sydney Water. Stormwater Harvesting Stormwater harvesting involves collecting, storing and treating stormwater from urban areas, which can be used as recycled water. The stormwater is collected from stormwater drains or creeks, rather than roofs. Recycled water is treated so it’s safe to use. Recycled water produced from stormwater harvesting can be used to provide water for public parks, gardens, sports fields, toilet blocks and golf courses. Typically, stormwater is under the domain of local councils. However, we may work with them to improve the health of our waterways, provide opportunities for stormwater re-use and/or protect people and properties from flooding. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 32
Figure 2-8 Kiama Golf Club uses recycled water for irrigation Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 33
Current research and development activities We are currently undertaking a number of research projects which will feed directly into water efficiency projects or inform related strategy. Most of our research into water efficiency and water conservation build on our relationships with key universities and institutions. Leak detection trials We are always investigating and scanning the market for new technologies which will can improve the way we operate. Currently we are undertaking two leak detection technology trials: TaKaDu and Utilis. Takadu is a "software as a service" solution which continuously monitors flow, pressure and other available network data to identify deviations from normal pattern for the early detection of leaks and other system anomalies. We initiated a trial of TaKaDu in 2015. The trial has been extended for another 12 months, with a reduced scope. Verification of TaKaDu events against reported breaks and leaks will no longer continue, as this has been adequately tested. Results from TaKaDu will be compared against similar products Innoyvse (IWLive) and Aquis which are also being trialled by Sydney Water in 2017 (Jun-Dec). Utilis analyses satellite imagery to identify water below ground level that matches a certain chemical signature typical of drinking water. It identifies potential leaks taking images covering hundreds of square kilometres at once. This raw imagery is then overlaid on GIS systems including street locations. Based on suggested locations, only a few leaks were found, so there was insufficient evidence to prove there was a significant benefit with the detection method. Sydney Water experienced some issues that delayed the start of the trial, and as a result the trial was ceased at 50% completion. Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 34
End use study: Understanding how customers use water at home The end use study will develop Sydney-specific detailed estimates of how customers use water for specific purposes, such as showering, toilet flushing and clothes washing. The project was started in 2017 and will continue into 2018. This large-scale project involves installing special high resolution, high frequency meters on over 400 properties to collect water consumption data that will be broken down into various end use parameters. This metering project will be supported by a customer survey providing information on the types and efficiency of water using appliances present and other factors that influence their water use. Information collected from this project will help inform future water conservation projects and forecasting future water demand. Figure 2-9 Keep a jug of cold drinking water in the fridge Water Conservation Report | 2016-2017 Page | 35
You can also read