TTM and post-arrest care: clinical trials and recent evidence - Benjamin S. Abella, MD, MPhil
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
TTM and post-arrest care: clinical trials and recent evidence Benjamin S. Abella, MD, MPhil Clinical Research Director Center for Resuscitation Science Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania RACI - Anchorage, May 2014
Speaker Speakerdisclosures disclosures Research Funding: NIH – NHLBI Philips Medical Systems Doris Duke Foundation Stryker Medical Corp Honoraria/consulting: Velomedix Stryker Medical Corp Medical Advisory Board: HeartSine Equity: Resuscor LLC
The post-arrest Survival problem in cardiac arrest arrest in-hospital arrest data CPR % Surviving 52% ROSC 18% hospital discharge Time
Reperfusion Reperfusioninjury injury Damage observed after restoration of blood flow to ischemic tissues % Surviving Time
Hypothermia mechanisms Reperfusion injury pathways ischemia reperfusion reactive oxygen mitochondrial species (ROS) inflammatory dysfunction cascades hypothermia vascular dysfunction/hypotension apoptosis – organ dysfunction cerebral edema
Concept of post-arrest Temperature TTM dynamics of TTM 39 Bladder temperature, oC 38 37 36 35 34 Cold (24 hr) 33 Cooling (8-12 hr) Rewarming (24 hr) 32 0 6 12 18 24 28 32 36 40 Time in hours
Snapshots of the three trials RCT details Multicenter? Main site pt rhythm pt location N HACA YES Austria VF OOH 275 Bernard YES Australia VF OOH 77 Idrissi NO Belgium PEA/asystole OOH 30
Snapshots More RCT of the three trials, part II details Age Female VF ROSC Target Duration Method (years) sex (#) (min) temp (hours) (%) (°C) 59 65 254 22 HACA (51-68) (24) (92%) (16-30) 33 24 Cool air 68 25 77 24 Ice Bernard (57-75) (32) (100%) (17-32) 33 12 packs 74 13 0 33 Idrissi (66-79) (39) - (27-37) 34 Up to 4 Helmet
What HACAcooling looks like temperature curves Cold maintenance Cooling (8-12 hr) Rewarming (24 hr) HACA, 2002
Hypothermia trials: outcomes RCT outcomes Hypothermia Normothermia RR P value (%) (%) (95% CI) Alive at hospital discharge with favourable neurological recovery 72/136 50/137 1.51 HACA (53%) (36%) (1.14-1.89) 0.006 21/43 9/34 1.75 Bernard (49%) (26%) (0.99-2.43) 0.052 4/16 1/17 4.25 Idrissi (25%) (6%) (0.70-53.83) 0.16 Alive at 6 months with favourable neurological recovery 71/136 50/137 1.44 HACA (52%) (36%) (1.11-1.76) 0.009
Hypothermia AHA in the guidelines guidelines Comatose out-of-hospital VF: Class IIa recommendation 2010: Changed to Class I In-hospital arrest, other rhythms: Class IIb recommendation 2010: Still Class IIb
Real worldofusage: Example Switzerland real world study 2006 Oddo M et al, 2006 Retrospective study at one hospital in Switzerland Cooling intervention with historical controls Survivors of out-of-hospital arrest (n=109) Cooling initially via ice bags, then cooling mattress Target temperature 33oC, maintained for 24 hrs All post-arrest ST elevations received cardiac cath
Real world usage: Outcomes Switzerland for VF patients Outcome at discharge for out-of-hospital VF arrest baseline CPC5 CPC3 CPC2 CPC1 56% 19% 12% 14% cooling CPC 5 .CPC3 CPC2 CPC1 40% 5% 14% 42%
Real world for Outcome usage: Switzerland asystole patients Outcome at discharge for out-of-hospital asystole arrest baseline CPC5 CPC3 89% 11% cooling CPC5 CPC1 83% 17%
Compilation of recent experiences TTM for nonshockable rhythms 2009 Hypothermia clinical benefit is robust (consistent across Numerous studies)
Compilation of recent experiences TTM for nonshockable rhythms Meta-analysis of hypothermia for non-shockable Rhythms (non-VF/VT) Kim Y et al, 2012
Research via a hypothermia Nielsen registry study registry Nielsen et al, 2009 Bradycardia (13%) Significant bleed (4%)
Cooling TTM and and thePCI cath lab 2011 Less than 40% of patients had STEMI; yet huge survival benefits when OHCA patients cathed
Prognostication is a challenge Post-arrest awakening Grossestreuer, 2013
Comparison between Comparing TTM devices devices No study has shown significant outcome or adverse event differences between devices Pittl, 2013
The 2013 The TTM TTM Trial trial (Nielsen – Nielsen et al et al) Nov 2013
Details The TTMof the– Setting Trial TTM trial
Characteristics of each The TTM Trial – Nielsen group et al
Outcomes in –the The TTM Trial TTMettrial Nielsen al
TTM subgroup The TTM analyses Trial – Nielsen et al
Key question Making sense ofraised by TTM trials the post-arrest trial HACA no cooling 36% 33oC 53% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 no cooling % 26% survival Bernard How can this be? 33oC 49% TTM 36oC 52% 33oC 50%
Temperature curve Marked differences in comparison control group Nielsen et al HACA study ~37.6oC ~36.0oC Bernard et al: ~37.3oC Large difference in maintenance temperatures
2013 TTM trial: key point 2013 TTM trial does not test the same hypothesis as the HACA, Bernard trials 36oC arm in the trial is still active management of temperature
Overview of post-arrest outcomes Degree of post-arrest injury severe moderate Mild / none Poor outcome Good outcome with any TTM with any TTM dose of TTM (33oC v 36oC, e.g.) affects outcome
Rationale for our approach Given that: (1)TTM trial was neutral (no differences in benefit or harms) (2) Cooling to 33oC is based on extensive laboratory evidence and two RCTs (HACA, 2002; Bernard et al, 2002) (3) We can t tell who will have significant post-arrest injury based on current technology and clinical factors (4) the chance to modify neurologic injury is in the acute care of post-arrest patients – and we don t get a second chance
Our consensus approach Therefore: it is reasonable to not change current practice based on the TTM trial, but rather continue to treat comatose post-arrest patients with a TTM goal temperature of 33oC. However, the TTM trial provides evidence that a more flexible approach is possible – for patients intolerant of 33oC (marked bradycardia, increased bleeding, marked QT prolongation, e.g.) or for patients that clinicians feel uncomfortable with treating to 33oC for other clinical factors, it is acceptable to treat with higher TTM temperature goals, up to 36oC.
Other key part of our approach ALL comatose post-arrest patients should at least receive TTM with a maximum temp goal of 36oC – normothermia as defined by lack of any temperature control is not supported by the growing body of literature. In addition to TTM management in the acute phase (12-24 hours of either 33oC or 36oC TTM), all post arrest patients should receive comprehensive best-practice post arrest care, including aggressive avoidance of fever for up to 48-72 hours following rewarming and avoidance of care withdrawal for at least 72 hours post arrest, as supported in the current AHA guidelines and the TTM trial.
More than care Post-arrest just hypothermia is multimodal Requires a critical care bundle : Therapeutic hypothermia Careful hemodynamic management Coronary intervention if STEMI or high probability of coronary cause Neurology consultation and assessment
More than Practical just hypothermia training in post-arrest care Hypothermia and Resuscitation Training (HART) course at Penn Philadelphia – next course October, 2014 Intensive two day CME course in hypothermia methods, protocols, and applications Designed for critical care, cardiology or emergency medicine physicians and nurse leaders – i.e., local champions Offers hypothermia certification Workshop design – small course size – held quarterly
Hands on simulations Expert faculty proctors Honoring survivors and rescuers Interactive learning
More TTM inthan just hypothermia the media Popular Science January, 2009 Freezing the Heart to Save the Life Good graphics showing effects of cooling
More TTM inthan just hypothermia the media 2009 CNN television documentary and book Features a number of arrest survivors
A closing story: a telephone call from a stranger
A phone call from far away… Sitting at home with my kids, I get a telephone call from a stranger WeDr. Abella? have This a soldier is Colonel down, John Dr. Abella, hePatton from the had cardiac United And arrest…. States weAir need to Force, calling you cool him…. from Balad Iraq.
Post-arrest hypothermia: an implementation problem 2008 2011 Many hospitals aren t using the therapy; other hospitals underuse it
Back to the scene: my phone call from a stranger
Case presentation • 33 year-old male soldier found unresponsive and pulseless with agonal respirations • First responders noted an anterior chest wall contusion and a freshly discharged halon fire extinguisher.
Soldier suffered VF arrest from commotio cordis
Team wanted to use therapeutic hypothermia but had no experience
Post-arrest hypothermia: an implementation problem We packed patient in ice, lowered core temp to 33 oC Prepared patient for evaculation
Cooling during international transport to Germany Critical care transport via C-17 to tertiary care military facility
Arrival in Germany, maintenance and rewarming …. Full recovery of patient, now returned to his unit
Case report now published Carlson et al, 2013
Summary points: the big picture Conclusions 1. Randomized trials strongly support hypothermia use for OOH VF arrest 2. Benefit doesn t seem dependant on method of cooling 3. Evidence based medicine supports basic protocol of 32-34oC for 12-24 hours 4. Adverse effects of cooling are mild; bradycardia is common, bleeding less so
Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Center for Resuscitation Science Lance Becker West Philadelphia – Penn campus Marion Leary Audrey Blewer Dave Gaieski Barry Fuchs Dan Kolansky Vinay Nadkarni Raina Merchant Robert Berg Gail Delfin Marisa Cinousis Kelsey Sheak David Buckler Amit Agarwal
You can also read