The Procurement Puzzle - Piecing together the perfect system - HICX
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Contents Companies upgrading procurement systems amid digital disruption face a strategic choice: single vendor, or build from different suppliers. This report explores a tough choice that may affect critical business functions for a decade or more. Software solutions to the puzzle 3 Suite providers acquire success 7 AutoNation drives an upgrade 9 Build on a solid foundation 11 Myths versus reality 14 2
There are now many types of procurement software, from bespoke solutions to all-in-one suites. Getting the right mix can be complicated, but the rewards are great. Over the past decade, Meanwhile, these suites – companies of all shapes and including SAP Ariba, Coupa, sizes have shifted to digital Ivalua and Jaggaer – have business models. Many have had responded to the challenge by to completely rethink the way incorporating similar features into they buy goods and services, which has lifted procurement as a theme up the organizational their products or launching best- of-breed buying sprees to quickly enhance their capabilities. 68% hierarchy. It’s no longer seen as So where does that leave a backwater for underperforming procurement leaders who employees, a place where are looking to upgrade their suppliers get squeezed and technology environment? Should invoices rubber-stamped and they opt for an all-in-one suite CPOs who are improving and little else. Instead, it’s the heart or build a bespoke system with automating their processes of a more agile, innovative and best-of-breed software? And data-driven organization: the Deloitte global survey, 2019 which technologies are most key to success in an increasingly likely to live up to the promises open, complex world. made by their vendors? This is partly due to the The answers will be partly vast amount of data that dictated by the industry flows through procurement in question, the current IT departments. Harnessed environment, available funds effectively, it can provide deep insights into business spending and supply chains, the ability to find cost savings that would and wider business objectives. Organizations with minimal legacy technology, for example, 65% are arguably in a better position otherwise be missed. But this to adopt bespoke solutions. can only be achieved with the right procurement software – But supply chain consultants and that’s where things start reckon large organizations to get complicated. that are heavily invested in their current IT setup shouldn’t US procurement leaders Numerous software-as-a- believing out-of-date discount the best-of-breed service companies now jostle systems block progress vendors, either. for space in a crowded market, Efficio/Cranfield survey, 2018 each offering to supercharge “You may have a very strong procurement with their best- ERP [enterprise resource of-breed solution. Many planning] platform or a very address a specific element of strong single-suite solution that the procure-to-pay or source- covers the end-to-end view,” to-pay (S2P) process; the says Iain Kirwan, a director relatively low cost of a monthly in Deloitte’s UK supply chain subscription means they’re consulting practice. typically cheaper to implement than an all-in-one suite. 4
“However, you might want to At the same time, the big single- if people don’t like using a accelerate the performance suite providers often claim to tool or module – or worse, of these solutions by adopting be able to do sourcing, supply can’t use it – then you can bet some maturing or emerging chain risk, supplier management, that maverick spending will technologies, or some additional contract management and more. occur. And once your core bespoke solutions.” On the However, “I think we’ve found procurement workflows and other hand, if you’ve invested that the maturity of some of the processes are automated, will very little in your S2P processes single suite providers [in some of your staff be capable of taking “then you might be looking for these areas] is not at the level it on a more strategic role? some point solutions [systems needs to be at either”, Mr Kirwan “I would suggest that strategic that can improve capability in a explains. The fact that even procurement functions fail single, high-importance area] to some of the big established not because of technology,” leapfrog where you currently are”. players still only have very says Roy Anderson, CPO and immature offerings serves to Chief procurement officers digital transformation officer demonstrate the importance (CPOs) who haven’t got to at Tradeshift and former vice of proof of concepts. grips with modernizing their president of global procurement processes are already falling at MetLife. “They fail because behind their peers. According Integration issues they haven’t reinvigorated their to Deloitte’s Global CPO Survey Integration is about data, staff to meet the new levels of 2019, roughly two thirds of creating a bedrock of accurate skill required.” CPOs are getting their house in information that is available order by implementing modern whenever, however it is “Strategic S2P applications that automate needed. Although best-of- core workflows, which can procurement breed tools are increasingly free up staff to focus on more able to integrate with existing functions fail… strategic work. Meanwhile, ERP platforms and other because they complexity masters – CPOs software tools, pulling them haven’t reinvigorated who outperform the survey all together into a bespoke population in terms of making their staff to meet system can still be complicated. key technology investment “If you move to best-of-breed the new levels of decisions – have a 30 per cent solutions to improve your skill required.” higher adoption of “upstream” efficiency or effectiveness, technology such as spend then you do have to deal with Roy Anderson, CPO and analytics, sourcing, supplier increased complexity,” Mr digital transformation relationship management Kirwan says. “They are more officer, Tradeshift (SRM), contract management, fragmented applications, you’ve and supply risk management. got more vendors to manage. Interestingly, however, a large That potentially increases the percentage of companies that complexity – and therefore the have fully implemented these cost – of integrating them.” technologies aren’t satisfied with the results. CPOs looking to invest in new technology also need to This is because best-of-breed be sure that their staff and solutions have a mixed level of suppliers will embrace the maturity, Mr Kirwan says, which tools they have in mind. means some of the newer solutions “probably aren’t at For instance, it’s vitally the level that they need to be”. important to consider the day-to-day user experience; 5
CPOs must also consider when SAP customers allow It’s often said that one of the whether the best-of-breed third-party applications to benefits of all-in-one solutions vendor they’re eyeing has communicate with SAP system is the fact that data on areas like sufficient funding to keep data. The issue came to a head business spend or supplier risk pace with larger competitors. in February 2017, when a UK is collated, stored and accessed court ruled in favor of SAP in in a single place, as opposed to And they must also of course the case of SAP vs Diageo. The ending up fragmented across ensure that the solution they latter had allowed customers several best-of-breed solutions. are considering genuinely fits and members of its customer A more direct approach is to with the requirements of support team access to SAP seek out a specialist supplier the business. data via third-party systems – a whose entire business is Nic Walden, a senior advisor licensing breach that ended up focused on data quality and in The Hackett Group’s costing it £54 million. Naturally, deploy their system to provide procurement advisory other SAP customers were this all-important bedrock. program, says that whatever worried that they too might be So is that the best way to solution they choose “people at risk of litigation – concerns address the data quality issue? say ‘we probably relied too that SAP has sought to address (API) functionality, which much on what the salespeople with a new document-based allow users to customize told us. We didn’t do enough pricing model. and enhance their solutions due diligence and actually according to industry, region test our own use cases, the The data dilemma or simply personal ways. way that we run our business processes, against what’s Deloitte’s Global CPO Survey Mr Anderson of Tradeshift actually in the solution’.” 2019 found that 57 per cent suggests that the idea that of CPOs see quality of data as a tool can meet the needs Indirect access has posed one of the main barriers to the of every user - from the challenges for SAP’s ERP effective application of digital engineering team to the sales platform. This is essentially a technology in procurement. office in China - is ridiculous. licence violation that occurs “People say ‘we probably relied too much on what the salespeople told us. We didn’t do enough due diligence and actually test our own use cases’.” Nic Walden, Senior advisor, The Hackett Group 6
Suite providers seek to acquire success In recent years, the big suite providers have acquired numerous best-of-breed vendors – a trend that looks likely to continue as the market consolidates. Jaggaer, for instance, claims that However, mergers and Customers of the acquired it became the world’s largest acquisitions carry a risk company might also be wary of spend management solutions of cultural, commercial or the merger. Indeed, Synertrade, company when it bought architectural incompatibility. a provider of solutions for BravoSolution in late 2017. In the past, some suites have optimizing purchasing and This followed its acquisition of struggled to properly fold finance processes, offers a Pool4Tool – a European direct their acquisitions into their “safe passage” program, a materials procurement specialist existing solution. discount aimed at companies – earlier the same year. who have seen a much- “If you decide to loved vendor acquired and Such deals underline just go for an integrated want to migrate because how quickly the procurement the technology is being software market is evolving. solution because damaged or important human To take another example, of the benefits relationships disrupted. Coupa recently acquired Exari, around productivity, The company notes: a leader in Contract Lifecycle automation, master “Thankfully many sourcing Management (CLM). The data and so on, professionals put a change of acquisition added advanced what happens when control clause in their contracts CLM capabilities to the Coupa with their providers and are Contract Management solution, they go out and buy now executing them when their including functionality for all these different provider is being acquired.” contract creation, collaboration companies?” and discovery. The deal meant that Coupa went almost Mr Walden asks. “They overnight from “having an talk about having a unified average solution to having application environment on a one of the best”, says Nic single code line, and they might Walden, a senior advisor in have started out like that. But The Hackett Group’s procurement as soon as you add in all these advisory program. extra companies you end up in Such deals are generally a world where you lose some good news for the acquirer’s of those benefits.” customers, who gain access to a market-proven solution. 7
Welcome to the The daunting language of APIs There’s still some way to go, app store in procurement software is of course. But for procurement being replaced with phrases professionals navigating an The future of procurement such as “app store” which increasingly complex software software may therefore look a lot signifies not only simplicity market, that future may come more like business-to-consumer but empowerment. It signals as a welcome relief. (B2C) software: an Android-like that mixing vendors is not an environment that allows users to option restricted to firms with install and delete thousands of a big IT department or unusual different applications, all running requirements, but is a normal on the same underlying master and straightforward choice for data, with zero disruption to firms who just want to get the business processes. job done well. Sector of primary operations According to procurement leaders in the US, UK, and Germany, what are the most important barriers to harnessing digital technology? 40% 87% Internal politics Lack of talent 50% 66% Incorrect/inaccurate Lack of vendor expectations support 52% 64% Procurement policies New tech not supported by too restrictive processes and skills 8
AutoNation and HICX see data dividends Case study 9
AutoNation faced complex data challenges, but a partnership with HICX is bringing savings and presenting new opportunities. Ask anyone in procurement to “It’s not until you’re in the midst of it that you name their biggest challenge, realize the importance of not underestimating and the answer is usually the same: data. the data” This was certainly true at The first step in addressing the More strategically, the AutoNation, the giant auto problem was creating a supplier integration – coupled with retailer that in 2018 sold data strategy, understanding master data governance – Americans more than $16 the gap between current means Auto-Nation now has billion worth of vehicles. systems and the needs of the a single source of truth on future. Details were important: suppliers that feeds all ERP AutoNation is a complex for example, verifying tax systems through an automated business. For new vehicles IDs was the first priority for process, ensuring consistency alone it sells 33 brands, while AutoNation, enabling it to in the data. Furthermore, it has around 240 stores across identify unique suppliers. HICX allowed for the seamless the nation. It also runs 85 management of mismatches branded Collision Centers and AutoNation chose HICX within the supplier record offers a wide range of finance Solutions as its partner. First, stemming from the two and maintenance services. new suppliers to the auto- different types of ERP systems. retailing giant on-boarded A single system was themselves via a self-service AutoNation has also realized not capable of handling portal, before existing suppliers substantial benefits through AutoNation’s procurement were gradually led through the automating workflows and volumes; it therefore had 14 same process. standardizing processes. systems deployed on a more Through comprehensive or less regional basis. This This self-service model was a reporting, AutoNation scaled meant that each time the big plus for HICX’s solution. The the ability to tap into real-time supplier relationship was support desk had been handling information, equipping the extended to a new region, the some 4,000 supplier inquiries company with the information data had to be duplicated into a month, mostly from suppliers needed to manage and better a new system. This created struggling to reconcile payments negotiate with suppliers: for huge data redundancies and received from AutoNation’s 14 example, through gaining inefficient processes, while accounts payable systems with access to the insurance a lack of insights about its multiple outstanding invoices. documents that vendors suppliers meant the company Moving suppliers to a self- can upload into the portal. was unable to leverage its service portal has brought This helped drive effective size and consolidate spend considerable savings and governance and better control. between business units to benefits for both sides. get a better deal. “Data doesn’t generally excite HICX’s solution allows for both people – it’s very foundational,” “It’s not until you’re in the corporate oversight and local said one AutoNation executive. midst of it that you realize flexibility. The central team “But the opportunities that the importance of not manages around 40 spending come from the consolidation underestimating the data,” categories, but local stores and and enhancement of data can according to a senior Auto- business units can also make have a healthy impact on the Nation executive. decisions locally about the bottom line.” suppliers that do the job best for them. 10
Build your system on a solid foundation of data “The challenge for procurement is data management.” 11
The challenge for procurement is not picking the best vendor, it is solving the problem of data management. Without this, any solution will disappoint. What’s your procurement It has been the dominant force Maybe they are finding that problem? Is it colleagues who in procurement for some time, systems bought from one refuse to use technology and but plenty of organizations are vendor are still proving difficult say it is “too difficult”? Is it wrestling with the fall out (ask to tie up because the vendor overseas subsidiaries that do global drinks company Diageo, has grown by buying other not link to corporate systems? which two years ago had to software companies. Is it zero visibility and the pay nearly £60 million to SAP, a It is time to stop, step back, impossibility of tying purchase leading ERP software provider, and think about what you want. orders with invoices? after using third-party systems Is traditional procurement still to access data associated with No matter what the issues are, the best way for the future? SAP software). the chances are someone has No company is static; high offered you a one-stop solution. Companies that had previously growth companies will need Someone has recommended bought into the supposed different solutions, sometimes or tried to sell you a suite that magic of a sole provider are at a dizzying pace. Is one promises control, efficiency, now discovering drawbacks. vendor always going to be the visibility, and ease of use, all Maybe there is a hot new best provider? Nobody can from a single vendor. software service but they can’t be good at everything, while use it because they are locked businesses are so diverse that It is an enticingly easy way into a licensing agreement. the best solution for one is far out of the procurement puzzle Maybe they have outgrown the from the best for another; the that has led to an explosion in solution that worked five years procurement needs of a Middle procurement software. ago, but it would cost too much Eastern retailer with revenues The problem is the single to ditch it. of £1 billion are very different platform solution does not to a multinational conglomerate always work. with £100 billion of turnover. 12
60% Let’s face it; procurement Instead of focusing on departments are wrestling outsourced software, many with a moving target. Not only companies would do better to is each company changing all focus on what is demanded the time, but there is constant of their data. Data by its very technology innovation. nature gets corrupted over Flexibility and agility are critical time; developing a process to cope with corporate change, of data governance and and a series of plug-and-play continuous curation to ensure CPOs citing poor master data apps that will move, flex, and information is the bedrock of and governance as a barrier to grow with your organization your ProcureTech could be the mastering digital complexity and its requirements may well best investment you ever make. Deloitte global survey, 2019 be the best solution. It could lead you into a future outside the four walls of your But it is worth remembering 54% company, to suppliers, partners, that there is no best solution and customers interacting with in technology, only the best common systems across the solution for today. What value chain. This is critical if remains constant, however, is there is to be a move towards the foundation stone of data. “lights out” procurement, Without good data, all the where automation replaces the software patches in the world fallible human. A plug-and-play won’t improve the procurement model will allow solutions to be function. Without good adapted to best suit the needs Firms using manual processes data, you can spend without of those using them. to move data between achieving any of the promised procurement systems efficiencies. Without good data, Solving the procurement software integration is always Jaggaer/EdgeVerve global survey, 2019 puzzle requires good systems going to fail in its outcome. for specific tasks, seamlessly integrated. But whether those Too many procurement systems are bought from one or functions jump at a solution, many vendors matters less than before envisioning the the management of the raw data end result. But technology on which those systems feed. is a distraction if it takes attention away from the real problem, that for many firms there is no single “source of truth.” So the challenge for procurement is not finding the perfect technology solution but solving the problem of data management, enabling information to flow smoothly from one system to another. 13
Single suite vs best- of-breed: sorting myths from reality Getting to the facts. 14
The right procurement system can deliver benefits for a decade or more. Focusing on the facts is the first step to making it happen. “No one ever got fired for “Let’s be clear, the vast However, Nic Walden, a senior buying IBM,” so the saying majority of the clients that we advisor in The Hackett Group’s goes, meaning it’s generally currently work with prefer the procurement advisory program, safer to go with a household single-suite solution,” says Iain says that while an all-in-one name when you’re in the Kirwan, a director in Deloitte’s may offer more across the market for new technology. UK supply chain consulting board, “if you need to be But does that still hold true in practice. “It provides end-to- the best in supply chain risk 2019? And given the speed of end capability in one place, management ... then a best-of- technological development, is with one vendor to deal with.” breed solution in that area might buying a suite really the “safe” actually be better for you”. option today? 15
Three myths about all-in-one suites They’re big and bloated Drew Hofler, vice president of portfolio marketing at SAP Ariba, says there is a common misconception that all-in-one suites are a big, bloated package that you have to implement (and pay for) all at once – even though your employees might only need some of the features it offers. “That’s simply not the case,” he explains. “You don’t have to buy it all at once; you can just buy the tool you need at that moment.” Additional modules that will “seamlessly fit” with those you already have can be added at a later date. SAP Ariba “can grow and evolve with your business”, he says. They offer the lowest common denominator user experience There’s a widely held belief that a suite won’t deliver the kind of precise functionality required, driving users to develop workarounds or simply avoid using it. However, Mr Hofler says the idea that a suite will only ever provide a monolithic, homogenized, lowest common denominator user experience is simply wrong. While the different features of a suite are designed to work well together, the platform is purposefully designed to handle distinct processes and user experiences, including through APIs, he says. They’re more expensive than best-of-breed solutions For small to medium-sized businesses, a suite may seem too expensive for their needs. Even with a modular approach to implementation, there may be features that seem like overkill. But once you start investing in multiple solutions from multiple best-of-breed vendors – and factor in the IT spend needed to maintain the connections between them over the course of numerous updates – you might find that the suite option suddenly looks a lot more affordable. What’s more, says Mr Hofler, the modular nature of a solution like SAP Ariba means there’s no need to go scouting for a bespoke vendor every time you want to improve one of your processes, further saving time and resources. 16
Three myths about best-of-breed solutions They’re riskier than a well-known suite Many CPOs and IT teams believe a suite is the straightforward and reliable choice, but all-in-one platforms are arguably harder to remove once they’re in place. The sunk costs and daunting management effort of a total replacement mean you are effectively locked in to one vendor. It’s also arguably a risk to invest significant time and resources in implementing a large suite that might not turn out to be an effective solution for the organization’s needs. What’s more, if there’s a problem with a suite, it will typically affect numerous business processes. Best-of-breed solutions, by comparison, are more compartmentalized and can be removed with relatively little fuss or expense. It isn’t as easy as downloading a new app on a phone, but it’s easier than a company-wide change. The big suites offer the same functions It’s fair to say the big suites offer an increasing array of features and options. Indeed, some of the big players have snapped up numerous best-of-breed vendors to improve their offerings. Still, many best-of-breed solutions retain an edge over the suites in their particular vertical. “One of the myths that has been pushed by some of the single suite providers is that they can do everything,” says Iain Kirwan, a director in Deloitte’s UK supply chain consulting practice. “And I think that we’re now seeing that actually ... there may be gaps that need to be addressed within a single suite solution.” Specialist vendors have built their entire business on delivering excellence on their part of the procurement lifecycle, which should drive constant innovation. Also, they are smaller companies so your business is more valuable to them and you have a better chance of being a VIP customer. They’re hard to integrate with other solutions Vivek Bharti, general manager of product management at Icertis, a specialist provider of contract management systems, says executives often believe that suites integrate the different elements of the procurement process more efficiently than best-of-breed solutions. “They think it’s going to be like it was ten years ago, when you had two different systems that could never talk to each other,” he explains. But times have changed. Best-of-breed solutions are much more user-friendly than they once were, and the vendors behind them are a lot more proactive when it comes to developing and maintaining integrations with other software tools. In addition, the increasing range of APIs has further helped to dispel the myth that best-of-breed tools are a source of major integration headaches. If the underlying data is accurate – and if it isn’t, no type of solution is going to deliver results – piping data around the different pieces of software is no longer a challenge. By embracing the strengths of all the different players, businesses can have the best of all worlds at their fingertips. 17
HICX is the Low Code Platform for Supplier Management. We enable business to find, maintain, and re-use trusted Supplier Data and Information across their Enterprise, across any spreadsheet, app or system. Our solutions enable your businesses to be more reliable, flexible, and scalable. Building from a rock solid platform of good quality data, we help businesses become digital in supplier management, third party management, compliance and risk, master data and finance management. © Copyright 2021 HICX Solutions. All rights reserved. 18
You can also read