The Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study

Page created by Justin Kelley
 
CONTINUE READING
The Mille Lacs Area Food Network
                        Feasibility Study

    Examining opportunities for collaborative marketing and sales of
   locally grown and raised agricultural products, locally produced
value-added products, and hand-made crafts in the Mille Lacs area of
                             Minnesota.

                              June 1, 2011
Executive Summary

  The goal of the Mille Lacs Area Food Network is to create a sustainable local foods system in
the Mille Lacs area that will increase collaborative sales and marketing of locally grown/raised
agricultural products, locally produced value-added products, and hand-made crafts. In
February 2010, a Steering Committee of local producers and community members was formed
to pursue a feasibility study to determine the best viable option for achieving this goal.

  In order to determine the projected demand of local food needed for the region, the Mille
Lacs Area Food Network defined the term “local” as within 100 miles of the Isle-Onamia
corridor, located in north-central Minnesota. The Pesch Foodshed Calculator was then used to
determine the volume and acreage that would be needed in production to meet projected
demands. Once this information was established, the Network then explored various business
options that would meet the goals of the study.

  A total of four scenarios were explored: a buy option, a lease option, a partnership option,
and another lease option. Each scenario was reviewed and analyzed based on financial
projections, experiences of similar business ventures, and anticipated competition. Scenario 1,
a buy option of an independent store-front located in downtown Onamia, concluded that
major expenses would be associated with the business start-up. Scenario 2, a lease option of
an independent store-front located in downtown Onamia (a different facility than Scenario 1),
assumed the ability to lease and use the existing restaurant equipment. Scenario 3, a
partnership with the Mille Lacs Area Food Coop (MLAFC) and Billie’s Market in Onamia, utilized
existing retail businesses for all season sales of produce, meats, and crafts. Scenario 4, an
independent store-front lease option, offered a certified, previously inspected kitchen and
minimal rent (a small percentage of sales).

  In the end the option that was determined to be most feasible was Scenario 4, the
independent store-front lease option at 108 Wall Street S. in Onamia, MN. The business,
recently named Farm Market Café, LLC, will be organized as a Limited Liability Company and
will feature seasonal soups, sandwiches, homemade breads and desserts, showcasing locally
grown/raised produce, meats and value-added products. See Business Plan, Farm Market Café,
LLC for further details.

                        Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                            Pg. 2
Table of Contents –
A.          Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 4-5
B.          Goals of the Mille Lacs Area Food Network.................................................................... 6
C.          Background Information ................................................................................................. 6
D.          Summary of Services ....................................................................................................... 6-7
E.          Size of Service Area ......................................................................................................... 7
F.          Demographics ................................................................................................................. 7-8
G.          Current Market Attractiveness and Future Trends......................................................... 8-13
                 a. Current Market Trends ...................................................................................... 8-9
                 b. Expected Market ................................................................................................ 10
                         1. Individual Consumers ........................................................................... 10-11
                         2. Institutions ............................................................................................ 11-12
                         3. Schools .................................................................................................. 12
                         4. Restaurants/Resorts ............................................................................. 12-13
H.          Expected Market Share: Pesch Foodshed Calculator ..................................................... 13
I.          Production Capacity and Costs ....................................................................................... 13-14
J.          Health Regulations .......................................................................................................... 14-20
K.          Lessons Learned from other Local Food Network in the Upper Midwest ...................... 20-21
L.          Financial Projections ....................................................................................................... 21-33
M.          Competitors Analysis ...................................................................................................... 33
N.          Business Model ............................................................................................................... 33-34

References ................................................................................................................................... 35-36

Appendix ...................................................................................................................................... 37-96

                                  Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                                      Pg. 3
A. Acknowledgments

        The following individuals and organizations have provided invaluable support, time,
money, and effort to complete this study over the past 18 months. Their contributions to the
development of a sustainable local food system will impact not only the local communities but
also the surrounding region.

   -Onamia Area Civic Association, Marge Agnew, President.

   -Funding support provided by the Initiative Foundation through the Onamia Healthy
   Communities Partnership.

   -Fiscal Agent support by the City of Onamia, Kathy McCullum, Clerk

   -Emily Mehr, MN GreenCorps member, with funding through the Minnesota Pollution
   Control Agency, was instrumental in completing this study, providing both technical
   support and invaluable market research.

   -Onanegozie Resource Conservation and Development Council, Dana Raines for in-kind
   contributions and consulting to the feasibility study.

   -SCORE, Small Business and Mentoring Program, Scott Powers, Consultant, for timely
   review and much-needed encouragement.

   -Onamia Public Schools and Onamia Community Education, Cyndy Rudolph, for MN
   GreenCorps host site responsibilities and in-kind contributions and consulting to the
   feasibility study.

   -East Central Regional Development Commission, Jordan Zeller, for counseling and
   assistance on financial projections and coordinating additional resources for successful
   feasibility study completion and business transition.

   -Kevin Edburg, Coop Development Services, for providing the Coop 101 Workshop.

   -Whole Farm Coop, Long Prairie, MN for sharing their vision, history, and experiences so
   enthusiastically.

   -First State Agency, Onamia, MN, Dawn Tinjum for assistance in completing financial
   projections.

         The Coop Steering Committee with local producers and community members who
volunteered their vision, time, and talent to initiate and see the project through completion:
   -Barb Eller, Eller Family Farm and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market, Chair
                       Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                           Pg. 4
-Marilyn Moorman, Isle Farmers’ Market, Vice Chair
-Emily Mehr, MN GreenCorps, Secretary
-Lynn Crotty, Lakes Meats, Treasurer
-April Weinreich, Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Bill Havisto, Silver Nickel Farm and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Billie and Nicoline Hill, Billie’s Market
-Bret Wilson, Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Carol Jacobs, Mille Lacs Area Food Coop
-Chriss Miller, Isle Farmers’ Market
-Chuck Long, Greenbush Farm and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Cyndy Rudolph, Onamia Community Education and Farmers’ Market Youth Program
-Dana Raines, Onanegozie Resource Conservation & Development
-Debra Rasmussen, Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Debra Nass, Isle Farmers’ Market
-Gerhardt Bergman, Lone Wolf Products and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Geri Pohlkamp, Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Joe and Shannon Riehle, Great River Gardens and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-John Hurley, Onamia Area Famers’ Market
-Josephine Rapatz, Dutch Fury Farm and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Marge Agnew, Onamia Area Civic Association
-Mary Kunesh, Lakedale Landscaping and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Mary Pat Sorvik, Sunshine Flower Shoppe and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Maureen Switzer, Mille Lacs Area Food Coop
-Naomi Iserman, Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Nett Hart, Webster Farm Organic
-Pat Root, Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Paul Warhepa, Pelucidor Farm and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market
-Penny Simonsen, The Tin Shack
-Peter Clay, Country Taste Farm and Onamia Area Farmers’ Market

                      Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                          Pg. 5
B. Goals of the Mille Lacs Area Food Network

    1. To provide individual consumers of agricultural products and/or locally produced value-added
products and/or hand-made crafts a year-round venue for purchasing such products.
    2. To increase consumption of locally grown/raised agricultural products
    3. To increase awareness and education about the importance of making healthy food choices for
not only individual health, but for the health of the community and local economy as well.
    4. To contribute to the further development of a sustainable local foods system in Central
Minnesota’s Mille Lacs Lake area by educating and encouraging sustainable production and
consumption.
    5. To keep overhead at a minimum and maximize profit for the producer and minimize cost for the
consumer.
    6. To provide at least 5% of the local consumption of fruits, vegetables, and meats within the first 5
years of business, increasing this as production capacity increases.

C. Background Information

    The revival of local food in the Mille Lacs Lake area began in 2005 when the Isle Farmers’ Market
was established in Isle, MN. In 2009, the Onamia Area Farmers’ Market was created in Onamia, MN
and in 2010, both markets jointly received funding and support through the Farmers’ Market
Promotion Program through the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Both markets have
found a niche within the Mille Lacs Lake community and continue to be successful.

    In 2009, with the assistance of a volunteer coordinator, approximately four local producers began
collaborative sales to the Mille Lacs Health System, selling in-season produce on a need-be basis. In the
summer of 2010 these sales continued and expanded to include the Onamia School District. There is
currently one coordinator (volunteer) and ten local growers who are selling to the health systems and
schools.

    In February 2010, a steering committee was formed by various producers in the community, some
who were members of the Farmers’ Markets, and others who were simply interested in creating a
sustainable food network. The purpose of the steering committee was to pursue a feasibility study of
an all season collaborative market as well as direct sales to health care institutions, schools, and
restaurants/resorts in the area.

D. Summary of Services

    The proposed Mille Lacs Area Food Network will be organized as a Limited Liability Company (LLC)
and lease facilities at 108 Wall Street S. in Onamia, MN. The initial business venture will include
reopening the facilities, newly titled the Farm Market Café, LLC, using local foods purchased from local
growers. Primary menu options will include homemade soups and sandwiches featuring fresh baked
breads and other seasonal, local ingredients. As the Farm Market Café, LLC business grows and
matures; expansion to Phase Two will include opening an all season farmers’ and artisanal market and
                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 6
will provide commercial kitchen space for farmers/growers to use for the production of value-added
products. Expansion to Phase Three will include using the space for collection, minor processing, and
wholesale distribution of locally grown foods to various institutions in the area. This final phase will
formalize current wholesales of local produce to the Mille Lacs Health System and the Onamia School,
adding the other interested health facilities and schools as production capacity increases.

E. Size of service area

    In order to meet the needs of the projected demand, members of the Mille Lacs Area Food
Network have defined the term “local” as within 100 miles of the Isle-Onamia corridor with a priority
given to producers within a 50 mile radius.

F. Demographics

      Isle and Onamia are neighboring small towns on the south side of Mille Lacs Lake in rural Central
Minnesota. Both towns are poor relative to other parts of the state. In the Isle Schools 41% of students
qualify for free or reduced-price lunch and in the Onamia Schools, 66% of students qualify (Minnesota
Department of Education, School Report Cards, http://education.state.mn.us). Recent economic
downturns have hit the area particularly hard. Mille Lacs and Kanabec Counties, the two counties in
which most residents of the Isle and Onamia School Districts reside, had unemployment rates of 15.6%
and 17.17% respectively in March 2009, compared to an 8.9% overall rate in Minnesota (MN
Department of Employment and Economic Development [DEED], http://www.deed.state.mn.us).

    In addition to having a high percentage of low-income residents, Isle and Onamia have other
demographic characteristics that make them unique in Minnesota. The Isle and Onamia School Districts
both encompass portions of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indian Reservation. In the Onamia School
District, 33% of students are students of color, with the vast majority of these being American Indian;
the Isle School District has a 12% population of color (MN Department of Education, ibid). The
population of the Mille Lacs Lake area is also older than the Minnesota as a whole. In 2007, 15.8% of
Mille Lacs County residents and 14.7% of Kanabec County residents were 65 and older. This compares
to an overall rate of 12.2% in Minnesota (Northwest Area Foundation, www.indicators.nwaf.org). As is
true in other rural Midwestern areas, the average age of Isle and Onamia residents is expected to
continue to increase in the coming decades.

   The combination of many low-income residents, a large percentage of American Indians, and a
growing population of elderly citizens puts the Isle and Onamia areas at risk nutritionally in several
ways:

               Low-income Americans consume fewer fruits and vegetables daily than do other
                income groups in the U.S. (Dong and Lin, 2009. “Fruit and Vegetable Consumption by
                Low-Income Americans,” USDA: Economic Research Service; Sisson, 2002. “Fruit and
                Vegetable Consumption by Low-Income Americans,” Nutrition Noteworthy, Vol. 5,
                Article 7).

                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 7
   American Indian children are especially likely to be nutritionally at risk and, hence, to
                be overweight and develop diabetes (CDC, 2004. “National Diabetes Statistics Fact
                Sheet,” www.cdc.gov/diabetes; Story et al, 2003. “Obesity in American Indian
                Children.” Preventive Medicine, 31*1+:S3:-S12).
               And senior citizens, despite fixed incomes, often do not take advantage of government
                nutrition programs available to them (Wild Dagata, 2002. “Food Stamp Participation by
                Eligible Older Americans Remains Low,” Food Review, Summer-Fall. USDA: Economic
                Research Service).

    Recognizing the traditional agricultural base of the area, the need for new venues of economic
development, and the lack of readily available local foods, Isle and Onamia community members began
organizing the Farmers’ Cooperative in February of 2010. Initial plans were created to pursue a
feasibility study of collaborative marketing and sales of locally grown/raised agricultural products,
locally produced value-added products, and hand-made crafts. The goal of the feasibility study was to
determine whether the proposed Cooperative is likely to be successful and beneficial to its members
and to establish a measure of local community support for local food systems.

G. Current Market Attractiveness and Future Trends

        a. Current Market Trends

    The increasingly attractive market for locally grown foods is influenced by a number of factors,
including health benefits, economic factors, and environmental concerns.

    The production and consumption of locally grown fruits, vegetables, meats, eggs, and dairy is
gaining momentum across the globe and Minnesota as people are realizing the health and economic
benefits of foods grown close to home and the perceived value of knowing one’s food source. The
World Watch Institute points out “…the local foods movement has exploded in recent years, whether in
the number of farmers’ markets, the range of supermarkets featuring foods raised nearby, or the
growing appeal of groups like Slow Food. Local ingredients are showing up everywhere from school
cafeterias to restaurant menus” (http://www.worldwatch.org/node/4132). In increasing efforts to link
people with sources of local food production, organizations have also exploded on-line to include
http://www.localharvest.org , http://www.localdirt.com , our own http://www.minnesotagrown.com,
and the Land Stewardship Project that maintains a directory of direct marketing farmers,
http://www.landstewardshipproject.org/cbfed/buy_food.html . The USDA has dedicated 2008-2012
Farm Bill funds to promoting local and regional food systems as a part of National food security.

    The romance of the American people with cheap food and lots of it is coming to an end as we
battle obesity and chronic diseases that have multiplied as a result of an excess of highly processed but
nutrient deficient, high calorie foods (World Health Organization, Technical Report Series 916. Diet,
Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, 2001. http://www.who.int/ ).

   In addition, emerging independent research is examining and beginning to demonstrate links
between environmental pollution, including pesticide residuals in food, and neurological and
                          Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                              Pg. 8
developmental disorders in children, reproductive disorders, and cancers ( Wigle DT, Arbuckle TE,
Turner MC, Bérubé A, Yang Q, Liu S, Krewski D). Epidemiologic evidence of relationships between
reproductive and child health outcomes and environmental chemical contaminants (McLaughlin Centre
for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. J. Toxicol
Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2008 May;11(5-6):373-517). Although the Environmental Protection Agency
is responsible for the safety and use of pesticides in the United States, there is simply a lack of existing
knowledge of the long-term health effects of multiple pesticides and their degradates that are found
in/on fruits and vegetables, in drinking water, and in the umbilical cord blood of neonates. A recent
study from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health pointed out that fetal exposures to
pesticides as measured by pesticides in cord serum are widespread, occur as mixtures, and differ by
maternal race, age, and smoking status (Gila Neta; Lynn R Goldman; Dana Barr; Andreas Sjödin;
Benjamin J Apelberg; Frank R Witter; Rolf U Halden. Distribution and determinants of pesticide
mixtures in cord serum using principal component analysis. Environmental Science & Technology ,
Volume: 44, July 2010). More people are increasingly concerned about the many chemical
contaminants found in foods, food containers, water, and household products. It is anticipated that the
President’s Cancer Panel will drive the research needed to clearly define the relationship between
pesticides (insecticides, herbicides, fungicides) and the risk of human cancers. In their 2008-09 Annual
Report, the Panel provides a concise summary of known pesticides that cause cancer, to include the
increased incidence of prostate, ovarian, melanoma, and childhood leukemia in farm families using
pesticides and in pesticide applicators. The Panel concluded that chemicals should be subjected to
rigorous testing before they come into general use. They further pointed out that less than 2% of the
many chemicals in use today have been tested for carcinogenicity (President’s Cancer Panel, Annual
Report 2008-09, Reducing Environmental Cancer Risk: What We Can Do Now. U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. April 2010. http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/pcp/annualReports/pcp08-
09rpt/PCP_Report_08-09_508.pdf). As the results of current and future research become public
knowledge, there will be an increasing trend toward stopping the use of pesticides (insecticides,
herbicides, fungicides) in food production and increasing public demand for food grown without
pesticide use.

    We are also beginning to realize that shipping in foods from distant industrial mega-farms and large
processing facilities means we are exporting our food dollars, jobs, and food security out of the state,
and in many cases, out of the country. The Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture completed a
study quantifying the dollars and jobs that a local or regional food system would contribute to local
economies in several Midwestern states to include Minnesota (Dave Swenson, Department of
Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Selected Measures of the Economic Values of Increased
Fruit and Vegetable Production and Consumption in the Upper Midwest, March 2010).

                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 9
b. Expected Markets

    The total size of our market includes individual consumers and the retail food dollar share based on
population, the restaurant industry food dollar share, health care institutions, and schools within a 50
mile area of interest. Major trends in each of these groups will be examined.

                i. Individual Consumers

     The population estimate based on 2010 census data within 50 miles of the Onamia-Isle corridor is
27,000. Population trends by county include: From 2000-2009 Mille Lacs County population growth
was a moderate 18.2% (22,330 to 26,383); Aitkin County’s growth slowed to 2.3% (15,301 to 15,646);
Kanabec County’s growth slowed to 6% (14,996 to 15,899); Morrison County’s growth slowed to 3.7%
(31,715 to 32,883); and Crow Wing County’s growth was a moderate 13.8% (55,099 to 62,723).
Southern adjacent counties saw moderate to high growths of 17.4% (Benton), 36.4% (Sherburne), and
26.1% (Isanti) (Source: USDA Economic Research Service, http://www.ers.usda.gov/). Our area of
interest includes portions of all of these counties. It is expected that growth will continue along the
State Highway 169 corridor as the urban population expands north from the Twin Cities.

    US per capita spending on food for home in 2009 was $2061, up from $1500 in 2000. Per capita
spending on food away from home in 2009 was $1868, up from $1387 in 2000 (Source: USDA,
Economic Research Service
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/CPIFoodAndExpenditures/Data/Expenditures_tables/table13.htm).

    Consumers are willing to pay a premium for locally grown produce, with freshness being the most
important value. However, those most likely to pay a premium tend to be female with post-secondary
education, and of higher economic status than those where price becomes the most important value.
In addition, those consumers who frequent farmers’ or other direct markets are willing to pay even
higher premiums than those who primarily shop at grocery stores (Kim Darby, Marvin T. Batte, Stan
Ernst and Brian Roe. Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics, the Ohio
State University. Willingness to pay for locally produced foods: A customer intercept study of direct
market and grocery store shoppers. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American
Agricultural Economics Association, Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California, July 23-26, 2006).

    The Food Marketing Institute (http://www.fmi.org/news_releases/) found that in 2009, despite
the recession, consumers continue to show strong support for locally grown products. Nearly three-
quarters (72 percent) of shoppers say they purchase locally grown products on a regular basis. Some of
the reasons they like to buy local: freshness (82 percent), support the local economy (75 percent),
taste (58 percent), environmental impact of transporting foods across great distances (35 percent). In
2010, the Food Marketing Institute found that more than half (53 percent) of shoppers say their store
offers locally grown or produced products such as fresh meat or produce, or processed local favorites
such as salsas, marinades, and jams. Their reasons for purchasing local products: freshness (77
percent), wanting to support the local economy (73 percent), and they like knowing the source of the

                          Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                              Pg. 10
product (46 percent). These results closely match the results obtained from Customer Surveys at the
Onamia and Isle Area Farmers’ Markets (see Appendix 1: Farmers’ Market Customer Survey 2010).

     Over half of the food bought for home use comes from supermarkets (59.7%). The other sources
include: Convenience stores (3%), specialty food stores (2.8%), warehouse clubs and supercenters
(19.2%), home deliveries and mail order (3.5%), and from farmer, processor, wholesaler (1.1%). The
latter source for home food reached a peak of 7.9% in 1929, 3.2% in 1969, and is currently relatively
stable at 1.1% for the prior decade
(http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/CPIFoodAndExpenditures/Data/Expenditures_tables/table14.htm).
Providing local foods within the consumer’s familiar local supermarket will reach over half of individual
consumers. Many local consumers do continue to purchase food for home use from the big
warehouses and supercenters. The latter are now beginning to procure increasing amounts of local
food as well. However, as transportation costs continue to rise, the local supermarket will continue to
be a major source for food as this industry survey points out.

     In 2010, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all food is projected to increase 0.5 to 1.5 percent—the
lowest annual food inflation rate since 1992. Food-at-home (grocery store) prices are also forecast to
increase 0.5 to 1.5 percent, while food-away-from-home (restaurant) prices are forecast to increase 1
to 2 percent. Although inflation has been relatively weak for most of 2009 and 2010, higher food
commodity and energy prices have recently exerted pressure on wholesale and retail food prices.
Hence, food inflation is predicted to accelerate during the first half of 2011, leading to a forecast of 2 to
3 percent food price inflation in 2011 (Source: USDA Economic Research Service,
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/CPIFoodAndExpenditures/) . In addition, there is concern among the
largest West Coast vegetable and fruit growers that tougher enforcement of the US Immigration Laws
will greatly increase labor costs, potentially driving costs upward (Calvin, Linda and Martin, Philip. The
US Produce Industry and Labor: Facing the Future in a Global Economy, USDA Economic Research
Service, Nov 2010).

                ii. Institutions

    There are four hospitals and nursing homes with food service in the Mille Lacs Lake area of interest.
Of the four, three were surveyed (Appendix 2: Institution Survey: Health Care Systems) and found to be
very interested in procuring locally grown foods, especially foods grown without pesticides. Hospitals
and nursing homes across the country, including those close to home, recognize the contribution to
individual and community health provided by local production and distribution of fresher, more
nutrient dense foods, and foods that are raised using sustainable methods, varieties selected for taste
and nutrition rather than shelf-life, and distribution lines that are 50 miles, instead of the 1500 miles
traveled from the West Coast producers to the Midwest. The increasing trend of local food
procurement is partly driven by the international coalition, Health Care Without Harm,
(http://noharm.org/us_canada/about/). This is a group of more than 470 organizations in 52 countries
working to transform the health care sector so it is no longer a source of harm to people and the
environment. The progress made is improving not only patient health, but also community and global

                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 11
health in a number of areas. Hospitals and nursing homes are challenged, however, with contractual
agreements with food distributors and ever tightening budgets. The labor costs of whole, unprocessed
foods may be a severe limiting factor. Dealing with multiple farmers, differing payment requirements,
and varying quality are additional challenges that can be best met by a local organization able to
provide consistent quality, competitive pricing, single invoicing and pre-delivery processing.

               iii. Schools

    There are six schools with food service in our area of interest. Schools face many of the same
challenges as hospitals and nursing homes. Across the United States and Minnesota, schools are
increasing their procurement of local foods for many of the same reasons as health care institutions. All
schools in our area are interested in providing locally grown foods (Appendix 3: Institution Survey: Area
Schools).

     There are rapidly growing resources available to assist schools in this effort. Farm to School is a
nation-wide campaign to “connect schools (K-12) and local farms with the goal of serving healthy meals
in school cafeterias, improving student nutrition, providing agriculture, health and nutrition education
opportunities and supporting local and regional farmers” (www.farmtoschool.org).

    The Minnesota Farm to School effort is following national trends by exponentially growing every
year. A recent survey published by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy concluded that the
number of Minnesota school districts participating in Farm to School during the 2010 school year was
123, compared to just 10 districts in 2006 (http://www.agobservatory.org/library.cfm?refID=107972_)
(http://www.iatp.org/localFoods/project_healthySchool.cfm)

     The University of Minnesota Extension offers a Farm to School Toolkit for school food service
directors. This toolkit provides information and resources for starting a Farm to School program, using
the food, sourcing the food and promoting the food to the students. Extension also offers resources
for farmers interested in selling their product to schools, parents, and teachers. More information can
be found on their website: http://www.extension.umn.edu/farm-to-school/.

               iv. Restaurants/Resorts

     The Mille Lacs area boasts approximately fifteen restaurants and resorts with food service. Many of
these restaurants and resorts are interested in serving local products when available (Appendix 4:
Institution Survey: Restaurants/Resorts).

    Americans continue to increase visits to restaurants across the nation. On a typical day in 2010,
Americans spent $1.6 billion on food and drink. This reflects a solid trend upward despite the 2009-10
recession. $2698 was the average household expenditure for food away from home in 2008. In the
2010 Restaurant Industry Forecast, 78% of adults say that going out to a restaurant with family and
friends gives them an opportunity to socialize and is a better use of leisure time than cooking and
                          Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                              Pg. 12
cleaning up. The number 1 trend in restaurants across the nation is increasing demand for locally
grown food including fruits, vegetables, meats, eggs, and dairy. In this industry wide survey, 70 percent
of adults say they are more likely to visit a restaurant that serves locally produced food items. In
addition, 56% of adults say they are more likely to visit a restaurant that offers food grown in an
organic or environmentally friendly way. The restaurant industry’s share of the food dollar in 1953 was
25%; in 2010 the food dollar share has risen to 49%.

H. Expected Market Share: Pesch Foodshed Calculator

    The Pesch Foodshed Calculator is a population based tool that integrates multiple data sources to
show consumption data for vegetables, fruits, and meat. It also integrates the number of generic acres
required to grow fruits and vegetables (See Appendix 5: Pesch Foodshed Calculator). The number of
acres required to grow 5% of the local consumption demand for fruits and vegetables in the Mille Lacs
area is 16 acres. As the population continues to grow, consumer demand for local foods continues to
grow and as production capacity increases, market share can also be expected to increase. It is the goal
of the Mille Lacs Food Network to provide at least 5% of the local consumption of fruits, vegetables,
and meats within the first 5 years of business, increasing this as production capacity increases.

I. Production Capacity and Costs

   With increasing population, there is a current trend toward purchase of small acre plots out of
what was previously productive farm land. This trend must be tempered by local Comprehensive Land
Use Plans that incorporate sufficient acres to meet the needs of a local/regional food system. City,
county, and state planners must be advised on the productive agricultural acres to preserve in order to
meet these needs (see Appendix 5: Pesch Foodshed Calculator).

     Historically, farmers in this area have not been able to make a living from their farms. Typically,
farmers hold 1-2 other jobs in order to maintain family economics and to secure health insurance
benefits. This has limited farmers’ ability to maximize production. Direct marketing has just recently
become feasible, but is often limited to barter/gifting with family and neighbors that often does not
meet the cost of production. Many farmers continue to use the commodity markets for corn-soy
beans-oats and feeder cattle, finished beef, and hogs even though the return-on-investment for the
small farmer is insufficient. Education and training is needed to transition some of the commodity crop
acres to fruit and vegetable production with a much higher return-on-investment (see Leopold Study).
There is also a need for local processing facilities that support USDA and MN Inspected (USDA
equivalent) processing to support direct marketing of beef, pork, chicken, and other meats to local
institutions and restaurants.

    In the short term, the increasing demand for locally grown food in this region will continue to be
met by backyard and community gardens, local farmers, and ranchers and by area farmers’ markets. In
the long-term, additional infrastructure is needed for collection, processing, and distribution of locally
grown foods to individual consumers via local groceries as well as local institutions and restaurants. The
Mille Lacs Area Food Network will be uniquely positioned to foster increasing local production of the
                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 13
many small to medium sized growers/farmers of the area while meeting the growing demand for local
foods from individuals, our local institutions, and our many restaurants and resorts.

    The low socioeconomic status of most residents in our area of interest places high value on price
and relatively lower value on freshness and supporting the local economy. The Mille Lacs Area Food
Network’s goal is to keep overhead at a minimum and maximize profit for the producer and minimize
cost for the consumer. We will also incorporate low income strategies to include EBT, WIC, SNAP and
Food Shelf donations.

J. Health Regulations
    Both the MN Department of Health (MDH) and the MN Department of Agriculture (MDA) have
jurisdiction over the proposed food service organization. In addition to MDH and MDA licensing, an
approved kitchen or processing facility must have a certificate of occupancy with documented
approval from local building, plumbing, fire, electrical, and zoning inspectors as required by state and
local laws. Additional information about purchasing fresh produce, meat, poultry, and eggs directly
from local growers is included in this section. It is anticipated that the proposed organization will assist
local growers/producers in meeting any requirements for inspection and licensing of products.

    Minnesota Department of Health

   The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) licenses food, beverage or lodging establishments in
Minnesota. Onamia and Mille Lacs County are fully under the jurisdiction of the MDH.

   Certified Food Manager as the person-in-charge is required for processing of locally grown
produce. Food Safety Manager Certification: Initial course work varies $77, License $35; Renewal
course work: 4CE, License $35/3 yrs (http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/food/fmc/index.html).

    The Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules Chapter 4626, contains the minimum design,
installation, construction, operation and maintenance requirements for all food establishments in
Minnesota. These rules are the standards with which food establishments must comply in the handling,
storing, preparation and service of food to the retail food consumer
(http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/food/code/index.html).

    In 2005, the Minnesota Legislature created a Statewide Hospitality Fee for all food, beverage, and
lodging (FBL) establishments licensed in the state (see Minnesota Statutes, section 157.16, subd. 3a).
The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) is required to collect a $35 statewide hospitality fee in
addition to existing licensing fees for all FBL establishments. This fee applies to every food, beverage
and lodging establishment within the state of Minnesota.

    Food and Beverage Operator’s License (annual): If an existing business is being taken over and
nothing else will change, contact restaurant licensing. An environmental health specialist will
determine fees and give final approval if compliance with all other requirements is met. Operation may
not begin until the application and fees are submitted and approved. The MDH Inspector for Mille
Lacs County is Joleen Hoepner, 320-223-7335.
                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                                Pg. 14
Restaurant Licensing:
Gary.Edwards@state.mn.us                         651-201-4513

Restaurant Licensing                             651-201-4505

Restaurant Complaints                            651-201-4500

Grocery Stores, Bakeries, Meat Markets           651-201-6027
  (Department of Agriculture)
    Plans must be submitted if remodeling or change in equipment is planned. Allow at least 30 days
for plan review. For required plan components and filing information:
http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/food/license/summary.html

    A final construction inspection must be conducted by MDH staff to verify equipment and
construction according to approved plans. . Inspection is required 14 days prior to planned opening of
the business. The business may not open until the license application is completed, all fees have been
paid in full, and the final construction inspection is done. Plan Review Application--Remodel or
Addition: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/food/license/prappremfbl.pdf

    Summary of MDH fees:
New business, Medium Establishment: $450
Existing business take-over: Fees determined by MDH, Restaurant Licensing
Joleen Hoepner             (320) 223-7335.
Remodel/change in existing business, Medium Establishment: $350
Food Safety Manager Certification: Initial course work $77, License $35
                                   Renewal course work: 4CE, License $35/3 yrs
Hospitality Fee: $35
    Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Dairy and Food Inspection Division

MDA licensing is required for all retail food businesses in Minnesota (in-store deli’s in grocery, retail
meat, retail bakery, convenience stores)

    Retail Food Store Sanitation Plan Review Application:

    The Uniform Minnesota Food Code Chapter 4626.1720 requires a retail food establishment license
applicant or licensee to submit the required fee, review application, plans, equipment specifications,
materials list, and other required information on forms supplied by the MDA at least 30 days prior to
commencement of construction, remodeling, or conversion. HACCP Plans are required for smoking,
curing, vacuum packaging, etc The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point system is a preventative
system for assuring the safe production of food products.
www.mda.state.mn.us/news/publications/food/business.../haccpbook.pdf.

   A final Sanitation Plan review must be scheduled with the State Food Inspector indicated in the
approval letter to set up inspection prior to operation. If the establishment meets all requirements, and
                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 15
approval is granted by the food inspector, a Retail Food Handler License is issued. It is also contingent
upon plumbing and/or waste disposal install/modification plan approval by the Department of Labor
and Industry (see below).

Additional MDA information: 651-201-6027.

Retail Food Handler’s License: $200, based on square footage less than 5,000.

    Wholesale Produce Dealer License:

    Any wholesale dealer or food processor that purchases or contracts with other Minnesota dealers
or farmers for any of the following products needs to be licensed as a Minnesota Wholesale Produce
Dealer: Fresh fruits and vegetables, Milk and cream and products manufactured from milk and cream,
or Poultry and eggs. Retailers, Agents or Brokers who purchase more than $500 per month directly
from Minnesota farmers or who handle or deal in produce with a Minnesota dealer or farmer for a
commission or fee are also required to have a MN Wholesale Produce Dealer License. Farmer-owned
cooperatives do not need to be licensed as Minnesota Wholesale Produce Dealers if 75% of the
cooperative's business is with members or stockholder patrons.

   A wholesale food processor/manufacturer license by MDA's Dairy and Food Inspection Division
may also be required. For further information about a wholesale food processor/manufacturer license,
contact the Dairy and Food Inspection Division licensing line at: 651-201-6062

    $110 minimum fee
    Total produce purchased X 0.00045 plus
    Application fee: $75
    Certified copy of license to be posted: $20
    Produce Buyers ID card: $5 each
    Produce truck stickers: $10 each
    Total first year without prior purchase: $110
http://www.mda.state.mn.us/en/licensing/licensetypes/fruit-veg-insp/wholproddealer.aspx

    Good Agriculture Practices/Good Handling Practices (GAP/GHP) Food Safety Audits

    The USDA Good Agricultural Practices / Good Handling Practices Audit Program was established to
provide unbiased third party audits of agricultural and handling practices of fresh fruits and vegetables.
These audits help the fruit and vegetable producer or the handler of fruits and vegetables to reduce
produce contamination. Many retailers and processors are making it mandatory that any supplier of
fresh fruits and vegetables to them must have passed a third party food safety audit. GAP/GHP audits
are currently voluntary. Fruit and Vegetable Inspection program staff is licensed by the USDA to
provide these audits for any growers, shippers, receivers, and re packers in Minnesota. These audits
consist of asking questions, reviewing documentation, and onsite viewing of warehouse, storage,
packing, and transportation facilities. The audit consists of all or any combination of the following:

    General Questions (Passing of this section is mandatory)
    Part 1. Farm Review,
    Part 2. Field Harvest and Packing Activities,

                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 16
   Part 3. House Packing Facility,
      Part 4. Storage and Transportation,
      Part 5. (deleted)
      Part 6. Wholesale Distribution Center/Terminal Warehouses,
      Part 7. Food Defense.

   Applicants can be audited for all or just individual parts that pertain to their operation. A passing
score of 80% is required on each part. Results of passing are posted on the USDA's website. Food
Safety is continually growing and could eventually be a necessity to handle fruits and vegetables in the
future.

   GAP/GHP fees: $92/hour plus $1.50/billable mile
http://www.mda.state.mn.us/licensing/licensetypes/fruit-veg-insp/fruitandvegetable.aspx

    For additional information about processing and serving locally grown produce in licensed food
service establishments see
http://www.mda.state.mn.us/food/safety/~/media/Files/food/foodsafety/fs-produce.ashx

    Local Zoning Ordinances
    Onamia Zoning Administrator: Micky Carter 320-532-3597 was contacted 3/22/2011 and advised
there were no local ordinances applicable to the Food Court lease option site. Mille Lacs County
administers State Building and Fire Codes compliance and inspection.

    State Building and Fire Codes Compliance and Inspection
    All food businesses in MN are required to meet the State Building Code. David Barsody is the Mille
Lacs County Building Inspector dlbarsody@frontiernet.net, by phone at 612-219-2252, or by fax at 320-
532-3630. To schedule a building inspection, 877-533-3629.

    State Plumbing Code
    Department of Labor and Industry approves existing plumbing and any changes at least 30 days
prior to opening any food business. Installation of plumbing changes cannot begin until plans are
approved. Failure to comply means fine and/or revocation of plumbing license.
Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry

    Construction Codes and Licensing Division
    Plumbing and Engineering Unit
    443 Lafayette Road N.
    St. Paul, MN 55155
    Phone: (651) 284-5067
    Fax: (651) 284-5748
    www.dli.mn.gov
    Locally grown produce, meats, poultry, eggs

    Fresh fruits and vegetables:

                          Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                              Pg. 17
Commercial food operators can buy produce directly from the grower if the person is selling
produce that they have grown on their own land. A license would not be required, as indicated by
Constitution of the State of Minnesota, Article 13, Section 7, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 28A.15,
Subdivision 1 , Minnesota Rules 4626.0130 (B). Such produce is considered an ‘approved source’ if the
food is not processed and is grown on the farm or garden occupied and cultivated by them as long as
the food has not been prepared or stored in the private home. A license would be required if foods are
processed, such as cutting, heating, canning, freezing, drying, mixing, coating, bottling, etc., or if foods
are purchased for resale. Processing would not include sorting, trimming as part of the harvesting
process, or preliminary washing to remove extraneous soil and debris. In addition, if a person buys
produce from another grower for resale, that person may need to be licensed as a Minnesota
Wholesale Produce Dealer.

     The farmer/grower is responsible for good agricultural practices and meeting the requirements of
State and Federal Law pertaining to the use of chemicals, fertilizers, irrigation, manure applications,
etc. The buyer is responsible for the following:

        -Identify the source of the product (ask for an invoice, etc. that identifies the supplier or
    grower’s name and address). Good record keeping is particularly important in case of a trace back
    of a product due to illness or injury.
        -If possible, visit the farm or ask for more information on production practices (if applicable).
        -Look at the transportation vehicle for chemicals, cleanliness, odors, and obvious debris.
        -Look at pallets, packages and boxed stored foods for cross-contamination.
        -Inspect the produce for signs of insects, disease, bruising and damage, freshness, over-
    ripeness, and immaturity.
        -Examine packages of food products to make sure that they are intact and not leaking, and for
    signs of contamination by rodents, insects or birds.
        -Check proper transport temperatures for potentially hazardous foods.
        -Wash produce before using it to remove soil and surface contamination.
        -If the produce is advertised as “organic”, ask for documentation that references the USDA
    Certifying Agent (http://www.mda.state.mn.us/food/safety/providing-safe-produce.aspx).

    Meat and Poultry Products:

     Livestock producers who wish to sell their products to grocery stores, restaurants, boarding house
and other food service institutions, must meet certain requirements relating to food safety prior to the
sale. The poultry and livestock must be slaughtered and processed in an establishment that is inspected
continuously by the Minnesota Meat and Poultry Inspection Program (MMPIP) or the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA). A list of State inspected meat and poultry plants is available or call
the MMPIP for a copy. For a listing of USDA inspected plants, contact the Minneapolis District office at
612-370-2400. The livestock producer must have a valid food handler license and approved facilities for
the storage and delivery of the products. Applications for food handler licenses must be obtained from
the MDA Dairy and Food Inspection Division. They can be contacted at 651-201-6027. Please notify
them that you want to apply for a food handler license and you will be referred to the area supervisor
or inspector. Meat processed at a custom exempt processor cannot be sold and must be identified "Not
For Sale." (A custom meat processor is defined in state and federal law as a plant that is exempted from
                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 18
continuous inspection because they only process meat for the owner of the animal. The meat products
can be consumed by the owner, the owner’s immediate family and non-paying guests, but not sold)
(http://www.mda.state.mn.us/food/safety/meat-sale.aspx).

    Eggs

    Poultry producers who wish to sell shell eggs from their production to grocery stores, restaurants,
boarding house and other food service institutions, must meet certain requirements relating to food
safety prior to the sale. These requirements do not apply to the producer who sells eggs from their
premises for direct sale to the ultimate consumer.

         -Eggs sold to grocery stores and restaurants must meet the requirements of Minnesota
    Statutes 29 and Minnesota Rules 1520. Copies of the statute and rules are available from the
    Reviser of Statutes web site. Basic compliance with these requirements includes the following:
         -The eggs must be clean and cannot be cleaned by wet cleaning. A sandpaper block or other
    means of dry-cleaning is acceptable.
         -All eggs must be candled and graded either by the farmer or by the grocery store or restaurant
    that purchases the eggs. A handbook about shell eggs and candling and grading criteria is available
    on the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) web
    site
         -Eggs must be refrigerated at 45°F or less after grading and be maintained at that temperature
    during storage.
         -Containers (cartons, cases) of eggs must be labeled with the following mandatory information:
         -Grade and size of the eggs.
         -The name, address and zip code of the packer or distributor.
         -A pack date in Julian calendar (day of the year) form. For example: The labeling of a grade A
    egg packed on June 1 will have a pack date of 152.
         -A freshness date not to exceed 30 days from the date of pack. The freshness date must also
    have an explanation such as "exp.", Best if used by or similar explanation. In the above example
    using June 1 as the pack date, the freshness date is July 1.
         -The safe handling instructions: "To prevent illness from bacteria: keep eggs refrigerated, cook
    eggs until yolks are firm, and cook foods containing eggs thoroughly."
         -Farmers who sell only eggs from their production are exempted from obtaining a food handler
    license. However, they must register with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Meat, Poultry
    and Egg Inspection program at 651-201-6027 (http://www.mda.state.mn.us/food/safety/shell-
    eggs-sale.aspx).

    References

In addition to references listed in the text, the following were consulted in this section:

Starting a Food Business in Minnesota
http://www.mda.state.mn.us/about/divisions/~/media/Files/food/business/startingfoodbiz.ashx

Food Safety Information and Resources
http://www.mda.state.mn.us/food/safety/food-safety-resources.aspx#producesafety
                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 19
K. Lessons Learned from Other Local Food Networks in the Upper Midwest
    As a part of this feasibility study, interviews were conducted with six established local food
networks throughout Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Kansas (Appendix 6: Local Food Network
Researched Organizations). Each interview followed a set list of questions prepared by the Mille Lacs
Area Food Network Steering Committee (Appendix 7: Local Food Network Interview Questions). Below
are the successes, challenges, and advice given by each group.

        a. Successes
           -As a new business, it will take 3-5 years to determine success rates.
           -Small towns are generally skeptical of new business ventures; it is crucial to accomplish
     what the business said it was going to do, by doing so, the business will gain support and loyalty
     from the community.
           -One benefit of a cooperative business structure is that it is less costly to expand because
     individuals do not need to invest time and money necessary to buy additional land, equipment
     and materials. Also, a cooperative business structure creates new sales outlets for smaller
     farmers who were unable to tap into the market before.
           - In order to protect against potential liability issues members of the cooperative must sign
     the “Memorandum of Understanding” which specifies obligations and functions of members
     within the alliance.

        b. Challenges

           -Delivery of items from farm to store; store manager required to pick-up products from
     farm because the order is not large enough for a delivery by farmer.
           -Sustainable growth: measuring quality versus quantity. Over time adding new products
     means additional costs as well as the time required to find and build new relationships with local
     farmers.
           -Educating and training farmers on the importance of quality standards.
           -Coordinating packaging and labeling. Meeting the needs of both the farmers and grocer.
           -Over reliance on a handful of bigger producers to meet the demand, versus multiple
     smaller producers.

        c. Words of Wisdoms

            -Set a larger boundary for local foods range. It was discovered that there were not as many
     local producers as initially thought, which made it difficult to meet demand. Recommend a 100-
     200 mile radius for “local” food.
            -Make sure items being stocked on shelves are things that customers want to buy.
            -Make a long term goal with realistic small goals that you can accomplish to reach the end.
            -Operating a retail store with food takes a lot of learning – get reliable help!
            -Make changes slowly to avoid going into significant debt.
            -Partnering with business owners in the community allows for experimenting with new
     opportunities for buying and selling locally grown food and allows for better communication
     between business owners and producers.
            -Celebrate small successes and allow project to adjust to challenges and grow over time.
            -Consumer education is essential to build a well-recognized, strong label.
                          Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                              Pg. 20
L. Financial Projections

   Financial projections were initially completed with the assistance of East Central Regional
Development Center, October 2010. Financial projections were completed for four scenarios:

        1. Independent Store-Front, Buy Option

        2. Independent Store-Front, Lease Option

        3. Partner Option with Mille Lacs Area Food Coop, Isle MN and Billie’s Market, Onamia, MN

        4. Independent Store-Front, Lease Option, Food Court

    Scenarios 1 and 2 include direct retail sales of produce and crafts from an independent store-front.
Scenario 3 includes wholesale sales of produce and crafts to the Mille Lacs Area Food Coop and Billie’s
Market for retailing and all season availability of fresh and preserved produce. At a later date financial
projects were created for a fourth scenario, an option to lease a store front, different from the facilities
examined in scenario 2. All scenarios include collaborative wholesale sales of produce to local
hospitals, nursing homes, schools, restaurants, and resorts.

    Year 1 Sales Projections were based on historical data and major assumptions are noted on this
worksheet. The Pesch Foodshed Calculator (Appendix 5) was also used for population based sales
projections using the listed wholesale pricing for 2010. Based on uncertain production capacity, it was
deemed more conservative to use sales projections based on available historical data. The Pesch
Foodshed Calculator is included here as providing year 5-10 sales projections and includes information
relevant to expansion of production capacity.

                           Mille Lacs Area Food Network Feasibility Study
                                               Pg. 21
You can also read