The impact of Covid-19 crisis on women on the frontline response in EU
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The impact of Covid-19 crisis on women on the frontline response in EU NATACHA AMORA • ANALYST • JULY 30 2020 Photo credit: Alvaro Isidoro, Portugal Summary Frontline workers during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) are more likely to be women, as they represent the vast majority of healthcare, childcare and aged-care workers, cleaners, and supermarket cashiers in the European Union (EU) (EIGE, 2020). As such, women are more exposed to infection and subject to higher levels of stress and mental pressure, due to the exposure to the virus, long working hours, lack of rest, stigma, and physical and psychological violence (WHO). In addition to their professional tasks, the lives of women are
also impacted at home, where they have to deal with the increased burden of supporting children in homeschooling on top of the routinely household tasks, which rise with family home confinement. To ensure that the gendered impact of COVID-19 is addressed and women’s rights are protected, governments should design women-led policies, through empowerment of women as leaders, equal representation, and decision- making power in developing policies in response to COVID-19 and beyond (Guterres, 2020). Background The COVID-19 pandemic is not only a health crisis, but also a social and economic one as a result of its spread and the resulting containment measures taken by governments. Although it is important to take into account the health, social, and economic impact from COVID-19, it is also necessary to assess and respond to the gendered impact, as the disease affects women and men differently. According to data from the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (EIGE, 2020), women amount to 76% of healthcare workers in the EU and represent a vast majority of workers in other sectors like personal care workers, (daily care to elderly and disabled individuals), health services (86%), domestic cleaners and helpers, (95%), and shop assistants and cashiers (82%) at food stores and supermarkets. Women therefore bear the burden of health work and essential services in spite of being undervalued and underpaid, as evidenced by gender haps and segregation patterns (Humbert, 2020). In addition, women are more likely to have precarious jobs, and are therefore not entitled to sick leave, parental leave, or unemployment subvention, which weakens their ability to overcome from the pandemic crisis’ effects (Davis, 2020). U N EQ U A L IM PACT Women working in the health sector include doctors, nurses, midwives, community health workers, and facility support staff like cleaners, laundry, and catering. They are under extreme pressure due to the long working hours, fatigue, lack of resources, inadequate gear often designed to fit men, congested health services, and risk of contagion for them and their families, requiring special attention to their health, psychosocial needs, and work environment. In the EU it is estimated that, on average, 13% of key workers in the pandemic crisis response are migrants. This percentage goes up to 20% in Italy, Belgium and Germany, and to 53% in Luxembourg (Fasani, 2020). The percentage of women per profession for migrants is similar as per non-migrants (Fasani, 2020). Migrants experience double discrimination through both low-paid and casual work, without access to protective measures like sick and parental leaves, or access to healthcare (Davis, 2020). Domestic workers and caregivers, of which 83% are women (EIGE, 2020), also need dedicated consideration, particularly to those working as caregivers for elderly or dependent people, where confinement restrictions force them to remain in the houses in which they work, sometimes without adequate protection and without being able to return to their homes and attend to their own families, where the largest share of the burden of care work falls on women (OECD, 2014). 2
At the same time, women continue to perform most of the domestic and care work, paid and unpaid, the amount of which has increased with the schools’ closure. Several had to quit their jobs as they have to care for their children and family. Single-parents, of which eight out of 10 are women, have become more vulnerable with this crisis, as they struggle to combine work and family care when schools are closed and families are confined to their homes. Furthermore, women on the frontline are many times deprived of health support (either mental or sexual health and maternal care) as the present focus of healthcare is responding to the virus, and many other health services are not being provided. N A T IO N A L G O V ERN M EN T RES P O N S ES IN T HE EU EU states have responded to the emergency crisis by enforcing special measures to contain the spread of the virus, and approving economic aid and recovery measures to the economic sectors most affected by the restrictions. With regard to measures promoting and protecting women’s rights, the common response by EU states include measures to fight the rise of domestic violence and ensure protection to victims in times of confinement; exceptional parental leave and allowances for parents required to take care of homeschooled children; and ensuring that sexual health emergencies are not suspended (pregnancy needs, abortions). Some countries have gone a bit further and taken innovative and exceptional measures (Europe Council, 2020) but none have conducted a gender analysis of the outbreak so far (Wenham, 2020). Belgium ensured automatic payment from the Government of the parental obligations when the parents (mostly fathers) cannot fulfill them as parents were laid off. Italy created the ‘Babysitter Bonus’ enabling essential workers to hire childcare for their home. Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Portugal kept some childcare facilities and schools opened for essential staff’s children (Cattaneo, 2020). The Czech Republic approved a bonus for healthcare frontline workers, and the government is expanding economic aid to cover precarious jobs, most staffed by women (Europe Council, 2020). Romania approved flexible hours, financial bonuses, and accommodation for medical staff, 75% of which are women. Germany enacted a bill to make it easier for unpaid workers to access social security and social services (Europe Council, 2020). With regard to migrant workers, Ireland created a dedicated team to deal with their specific problems, while Portugal granted temporary residence permits, allowing access to medical care and other rights including housing, and bank accounts. Finally, Sweden extended several labour market integration programmes for 12 months, allowing migrants to remain employed (Europe Council, 2020). Despite the above measures, “gender expertise is lacking in pandemic planning, outbreak response and post- pandemic recovery” (Evans, 2020). Women are often underrepresented in decision-making processes and, consequently, the negative gender impact and its economic and social consequences aggravate inequalities. 3
Policy Recommendations • Balanced gender representation in COVID-19 planning response and decision making, where the voices of women on the frontline, women’s associations, and gender experts are heard. • Gender mainstreaming of the pandemic impact to understand and recognize the different effects of the outbreak on individuals and communities and to not perpetuate inequalities. • Transform inequalities of unpaid care work into a new, inclusive care economy. • Design protective measures to support and assist frontline workers in their needs (health, safety, work conditions, equipment, family support) and addressing inequalities. • Centre women in all efforts to address the socio-economic impact of COVID-19. • Ensure that economic investment to support the economy covers all sectors and not only those where men are largely employed. • Dedicate funding to support the economic empowerment of women and ensure the rights of women are protected and prioritised. 4
References Cattaneo, U. & Pozzan, E. (2020) “Women health workers: Working relentlessly in hospitals and at home” ILO, available at https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_741060/lang--en/index.htm (accessed 2 July 2020) Council of Europe (CoE) (2020) “Promoting and protecting women’s rights at national level” available at https://www.coe.int/en/web/genderequality/promoting-and-protecting-women-s-rights#{%2263001324%22:[39]} (accessed 2 July 2020) Corral, R. (2020) “Gender Bias In Personal Protective Equipment”, KCBS Radio, available at https://kcbsradio.radio.com/media/audio- channel/gender-bias-in-personal-protective-equipment (accessed 2 July 2020) Davis, S. E. et al. (2020) “Why gender matters in the impact and recovery of Covid-19?”, The Lowy Institute, available at https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/why-gender-matters-impact-and-recovery-covid-19 (accessed 2 July 2020) EIGE (2020) “Covid-19 and Gender equality”, European Institute for Gender Equality, available at https://eige.europa.eu/topics/health/covid-19-and-gender-equality (accessed 26 June 2020) Evans, D. (2020) “How will Covid-19 affect women and girls in low and middle income countries?”, Center for Global Development, available at https://www.cgdev.org/blog/how-will-covid-19-affect-women-and-girls-low-and-middle-income-countries (accessed 2 July 2020) Evans, D., Over M. (2020) “The Economic Impact of Covid-19 in low and middle income countries”, Center for Global Development, available at https://www.cgdev.org/blog/economic-impact-covid-19-low-and-middle-income-countries (accessed 2 July 2020) Fasani, F. (2020) “Immigrant key workers in Europe: The Covid-19 response that comes from abroad” Vox, CEPR, available at https://voxeu.org/article/covid-19-immigrant-workers-europe (accessed 2 July 2020) Fasani F. Mazza, J. (2020) “Immigrant Key Workers: Their Contribution to Europe’s COVID-19 Response”, JRC, available at https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/sites/know4pol/files/key_workers_covid_0423.pdf (accessed 2 July 2020) Guterres, A. (2020) “UN Secretary-General António Guterres’s message introducing the policy brief”, available https://www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/put-women-and-girls-centre-efforts-recover-covid-19 (accessed 2 July 2020) Haddad, A. (2020) “Covid-19 is not gender neutral”, Broad Agenda, available at http://www.broadagenda.com.au/home/covid-19-is- not-gender-neutral/ (accessed 2 July 2020) Humbert, A.L. (2020) “To really value our healthcare workers, we need to close the gender pay gap” Kings College London, available at https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/to-really-value-our-healthcare-workers-we-need-to-close-the-gender-pay-gap-1 (accessed 2 July 2020) Instituto de la Mujer (2020) “The gender approach, key in COVID-19 response”, available at http://www.inmujer.gob.es/diseno/novedades/PlantillaCovid-19/EN_IMPACTO_DE_GENERO_DEL_COVID-19_03_EN.pdf (accessed 2 July 2020) Ipsos Mori & The Fawcett Society (2020) “Women are bearing the emotional brunt of the coronavirus crisis” available at https://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/news/women-are-bearing-the-emotional-brunt-of-the-coronavirus-crisis (accessed 2 July 2020) 5
OECD (2014), “Unpaid Care Work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcomes” available at https://www.oecd.org/dev/development-gender/Unpaid_care_work.pdf (accessed 26 June 2020) OHCHR (2020) “Covid-19 and Women’s Human Rights: guidance”, OHCHR, available at https://www.ohchr.org/EN/AboutUs/Pages/WhoWeAre.aspx (accessed 2 July 2020) O´Toole, F. (2020) “We are learning how much we rely on low-paid workers”, The Irish Times, available at https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/fintan-o-toole-we-are-learning-how-much-we-rely-on-low-paid-workers- 1.4212082?mode=sample&auth-failed=1&pw-origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.irishtimes.com%2Fopinion%2Ffintan-o-toole-we-are- learning-how-much-we-rely-on-low-paid-workers-1.4212082 (accessed 2 July 2020) PES Women (2020) “Women are on the front line of the corona-crisis, yet gender-issues are being ignored”, PES Socialists & Democrats, available at https://www.pes.eu/en/news-events/news/detail/PES-Women-Women-are-on-the-front-line-of-the-corona-crisis-yet- gender-issues-are-being-ignored/ (accessed 2 July 2020) Plataforma Portuguesa para os Direitos da Mulher (2020) “Garantir os direitos humanos das mulheres no atual contexto de pandemia (COVID-19): Medidas para impedir a falência das redes de organizações de mulheres” available at https://plataformamulheres.org.pt/garantir-os-direitos-humanos-das-mulheres-no-atual-contexto-de-pandemia-covid-19-medidas- para-impedir-a-falencia-das-redes-de-organizacoes-de-mulheres/ (accessed 2 July 2020) Pugh, R. (2020) “COVID-19 PPE Gender Divide: No One-Size-Fits-All?”, Medscape News, UK, available at https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/929860?nlid=135399_5653&src=wnl_newsalrt_daily_200504_MSCPEDIT&uac=186660MK& impID=2369864&faf=1 (accessed 2 July 2020) United Nations (2020) “Policy Brief: The Impact of COVID-19 on Women”, available at https://www.unwomen.org/- /media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2020/policy-brief-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-women- en.pdf?la=en&vs=1406 (accessed 2 July 2020) Wenham, C., Smith, J., Morgan, R. (2020) “Covid-19: The gender impacts of the outbreak”, The Lancet Journal, available at https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30526-2/fulltext (accessed 2 July 2020) WHO (2020) “Coronavirus disease (covid-19) outbreak: rights, roles and responsibilities of health workers, including key considerations for occupational safety and health”, available at https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-rights-roles-respon-hw- covid-19.pdf (accessed 2 July 2020) Zhou V. (2020) “Needs of female medical workers overlooked in coronavirus fight, advocates say”, Instone South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd, China, available at https://www.inkstonenews.com/health/coronavirus-womens-advocates-ship-period-products- center-outbreak/article/3050653 (accessed 2 July 2020) 6
You can also read