The Higgs Boson in the Periodic System of Elementary Particles
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Journal of Modern Physics, 2013, 4, 21-26
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2013.44A004 Published Online April 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/jmp)
The Higgs Boson in the Periodic System of
Elementary Particles
Ding-Yu Chung1, Ray Hefferlin2
1
Utica, Michigan, USA
2
Department of Physics, Southern Adventist University, Collegedale, USA
Email: dy_chung@yahoo.com, hefferln@southern.edu
Received February 12, 2013; revised March 15, 2013; accepted March 27, 2013
Copyright © 2013 Ding-Yu Chung, Ray Hefferlin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
It is proposed that the observed Higgs Boson at the LHC is the Standard Model Higgs boson that adopts the existence of
the hidden lepton condensate. The hidden lepton is in the forbidden lepton family, outside of the three lepton families of the
Standard Model. Being forbidden, a single hidden lepton cannot exist alone; so it must exist in the lepton condensate as a
composite of μ’ and μ’± hidden leptons and their corresponding antileptons. The calculated average mass of the hidden lep-
ton condensate is 128.8 GeV in good agreements with the observed 125 or 126 GeV. The masses of the hidden lepton con-
densate and all elementary particles including leptons, quarks, and gauge bosons are derived from the periodic system of
elementary particles. The calculated constituent masses are in good agreement with the observed values by using only four
known constants: the number of the extra spatial dimensions in the eleven-dimensional membrane, the mass of electron, the
mass of Z boson, and the fine structure constant.
Keywords: Higgs Boson; Periodic System; Elementary Particles
1. Introduction Higgs boson [4,5].
In this paper, the periodic system of elementary parti-
As described in “In Molecular Taxonomy: String, quark,
cles based on string theory is used to describe the newly
hadron, nuclear, atomic and chemical molecule periodic
discovered Higgs boson at the LHC, and the calculated
or invariant systems” [1], chemists and physicists have
mass from this periodic system of elementary particles is
accumulated vast libraries of data about the properties
in good agreement with the observed value.
and atoms and molecules via the simplest to the most
complex experiments; from Bohr to Schrödinger theory;
2. The Periodic System of Elementary
and using back-of-the-envelope to supercomputer com-
Particles
putation. Much of it is distilled into the periodic chart of
the elements and models about the various molecular The periodic system of elementary particles is based on
bonds. Though starting more recently, scientists have the “überparticles” of our universe. An überparticle con-
garnered as many or more numbers describing character- sists of two four dimensional particles each with its own
istics of nuclei, the essence of which is seen in the chart set of seven “dimensional orbitals”. The seven dimen-
of the isotopes. Still more recently, the simplest funda- sional orbitals represent originally [6] the seven extra
mental particle properties have been epitomized in the spatial dimensions in the eleven dimensional membrane
geometric patterns showing hadrons and their quark con- of string theory.
stituents. And now even string theory has produced a In an überparticle, one four dimensional particle has
periodic system, such as the periodic system of elemen- the seven “principal dimensional orbitals”, while the
tary particles [2,3]. other four dimensional particle has the seven “auxiliary
At the LHC (Large Hadron Collider), the ATLAS and dimensional orbitals” that are superimposed on the seven
CMS experiments of CERN experiments observe a new principal dimensional orbitals. In an überparticle, the
particle in the mass region around 125 - 126 GeV with a auxiliary orbitals are dependent on the principal orbitals,
high degree of certainty, and the decay modes and the so only one set of dimensional orbitals appears. The
spin of the new particle point to the Standard Model principal dimensional orbitals are mainly for leptons and
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. JMP22 D.-Y. CHUNG, R. HEFFERLIN
gauge bosons, and the auxiliary dimensional orbitals are quarks appear on and higher than d = 9, which is outside
mainly for individual quarks. Because of the dependence of the Standard Model and the seven auxiliary dimen-
of the auxiliary dimensional orbitals, individual quarks sional orbitals. f9 and f10 are the principal fermions on d =
are hidden. The configuration of dimensional orbitals and 9 and 10, respectively. The gauge bosons are not shown,
the periodic system of elementary particles are shown in and can be located on the top row at principal dimen-
Figure 1 and Table 1. sional orbitals as shown in Table 1.
Figure 1 shows leptons and quarks. The symbols of
the top row represent leptons and their components. e, e,
μ, and are on the principal dimensional orbitals, 5, 6,
7, and 8, respectively. Other leptons (, τ, and ) are
the composites of both the principal components (e and )
and auxiliary components (7, 7 and 8) as shown in
Table 2. The symbols below the numbers are the princi-
pal and auxiliary components of quarks. All quarks are
the composites of both principal components (u5, d6, ,
Figure 1. The überparticle represented by leptons and
and ') and auxiliary components (u7, d7, s7, c7, b7, t7, b8, quarks in the seven principal dimensional orbitals (solid
and t8) as shown in Table 2. The seven auxiliary dimen- lines) denoted by the principal dimensional orbital number
sional orbitals can accommodate only three families of d and the seven auxiliary dimensional orbitals (dash-dotted
lepton-quark as in the Standard Model. No leptons and lines) denoted by the auxiliary dimensional number a.
Table 1. The überparticle represented by the periodic system of elementary particles d = principal dimensional orbital num-
ber, a = auxiliary dimensional orbital number.
d a=0 1 2 a=0 1 2 3 4 5
Lepton Quark Boson
5 l5 = e q5 = u5 B5 = A
6 l6 = e q6 = d6 B6 = π1 2
7 l7 = 7 7 q7 = u7/d7 s7 c7 b7 t7 B7 = Z L0
8 l8 = 8 q8 = ' (hidden) b8 (hidden) t8 B8 = XR
9 f9 B9 = XL
10 f10 B10 = Z R0
11 B11
Table 2. The compositions and the constituent masses of leptons and quarks d = principal dimensional orbital number and a
= auxiliary dimensional orbital number.
da Composition Calculated Mass
Leptons dafor leptons
e 50 e ≈0
e 60 e 0.51 MeV(given)
70 ≈0
80 ≈0
60 + 70 + 71 e + + 7 105.6 MeV
60 + 70 + 72 e + + 7 1786 MeV
60 + 70 + 72 + 80 + 81 e + + 7 + + 8 (3/2 Z°) 136.9 GeV
60 + 70 + 72 + 80 + 81 e + + 7 + + 8 ±
(3/2 W ) 120.7 GeV
Quarks da for quarks
u 50 + 70 + 71 q5 + q7 + u7 330.8 MeV
d 60 + 7 0 + 7 1 q6 + q7 + d7 332.3 MeV
s 60 + 70 + 72 q 6 + q 7 + s7 558 MeV
c 50 + 70 + 73 q5 + q7 + c7 1701 MeV
b 60 + 70 + 7 4 q6 + q7 + b7 5318 MeV
t 50 + 70 + 75 + 80 + 8 2 q 5 + q 7 + t7 + q 8 + t 8 176.5 GeV
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. JMPD.-Y. CHUNG, R. HEFFERLIN 23
Table 1 shows leptons, quarks, and gauge bosons. For M 5, B M 6, F M e . (2a)
leptons, the leptons at a = 0 are the principal leptons (e,
e, μ, and ). Other leptons (, τ, and ) are the com- M 6, B M 5, B 2 M e M π 2 (2b)
posites of both the principal components (e and at a = 0)
The bosons generated in this manner are the dimen-
and auxiliary components (7, 7 and 8 at a > 0) as
sional orbital bosons or BD as shown in Table 3.
shown in Table 2. All quarks are the composites of both
In Table 3, = e (the fine structure constant for elec-
principal components (u5, d6, , and at a = 0) and
tromagnetic field), M Z M w cos qw , and w sin 2 qw
auxiliary components (u7, d7, s7, c7, b7, t7, b8, and t8 at a >
[7]. w is not same as e because there is a mixing be-
0) as shown in Table 2. Outside of the Standard Model,
tween B5 and B7 as the symmetry mixing between U(1)
is hidden, and is balanced by the hidden b8. No lep-
and SU(2) in the standard theory of the electroweak in-
tons and quarks appear on and higher than d = 9, which is
teraction, and sinw is not equal to 1. The calculated
outside of the Standard Model and the seven auxiliary
value for w is 0.02973, and sin2w is 0.2454 in good
dimensional orbitals. The bosons, B5, B6, B7, B8, B9, B10,
agreement with 0.2312 for the observed value of sin2w
and B11 are shown in Table 3.
[8]. The calculated energy for B11 is 1.11019 GeV in
The principal dimensional orbitals are for gauge bos-
good agreement with the Planck mass, 1.2 1019 GeV .
ons of the force fields, as shown in Table 1. It will be
The strong interaction, represented by π1 2 (half of a
shown shortly that Fd has lower energy than Bd. and simi-
pion), is for the interactions among quarks and for the
larly the seven principal dimensional orbitals are ar-
hiding of individual quarks in auxiliary orbitals. The
ranged as F5 B5 F6 B6 F7 B7 F8 B8 F9 B9 F10 B10 F11 B11,
weak interaction, represented by Z L0 , is for the interac-
where B and F are the boson and fermion in each orbital.
tion involving changing flavors among quarks and lep-
In previous communications [3] we have shown that the
tons. The auxiliary dimensional orbitals are derived from
masses of fundamental particles are related to each other
principal dimensional orbitals. They are for high-mass
with three simple formulae, and that the use of accepted
leptons and individual quarks.
mass data allows calculation of masses of many other
All leptons and quarks with d’s, a’s and the calculated
particles. The formulae are
masses are listed in Table 2 as discussed in Ref. [3]
M d , F M d , B d , B , (1a) Table 2 shows the compositions of leptons and quarks.
Each fermion can be defined by principal dimensional
M d 1, B M d , F d , F , (1b)
orbital numbers (d’s) and auxiliary dimensional orbital
M d 1, B M d , B d2 , (1c) numbers (a’s). For examples, e is 60 that means it has d
(principal dimensional orbital number) = 6 and a (auxil-
where d is the dimensional orbital number from 6 to 11. iary dimensional orbital number) = 0, so e is a principal
E5,B and E11,B are the energies for the 5d dimensional or- dimensional fermion. All neutrinos are nearly massless
bital and the 11d dimensional orbital, respectively. Each because of chiral symmetry (permanent chiral symmetry).
dimension has its own d, and all d s except 7 (w) of As shown in Table 2, and are the hidden (for-
the seventh dimension (weak interaction) are equal to , bidden) leptons outside of the three lepton families in the
the fine structure constant of electromagnetism. The Standard Model. All elementary particles (gauge bosons,
lowest energy boson is the Coulombic field for electro- leptons, and quarks) are in the periodic system of ele-
magnetism and the second lowest boson energy is π1 2 mentary particles with the calculated constituent masses
(a spin 1 boson as a half of the spin 0 pion) for the strong in good agreement with the observed values [9,10] by
interaction. using only four known constants: the number of the extra
Table 3. The Masses of the dimensional orbital gauge bosons: = e, d = dimensional orbital number.
Bd Md GeV (calculated) Gauge boson Interaction
B5 M e 3.7 106 A = photon Electromagnetic
B6 Me/ 7 10 2
π1 2 Strong
B7 M6 / 2
w
cosw 91.177 (given) Z 0
L weak (left)
B8 M7/2 1.7 106 XR CP (right) nonconservation
B9 M8/2 3.2 1010 XL CP (left) nonconservation
M9/ 6.0 10
0
B10 2 14
Z R weak (right)
B11 M10/ 2
1.1 10 19
G Gravity
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. JMP24 D.-Y. CHUNG, R. HEFFERLIN
spatial dimensions in the eleven-dimensional membrane, 3
8 W
the mass of electron, the mass of Z boson, and the fine 2
structure constant. For an example, the calculated mass 60 70 7 2 80 81
of top quark is 176.5 GeV in good agreement with the
e 7 8
observed 173.5 GeV [11].
The calculated masses of the hidden lepton are 120.7
3. The Observed Higgs Boson GeV (for the mass of ) and 136.9 GeV (for the mass
of ) with the average as 128.8 GeV for the hidden
We propose that the observed Higgs boson is the Stan- lepton condensate, in good agreements with the results
dard Model Higgs boson that adopts the existence of the from LHC (125 GeV or 126 GeV).
hidden lepton condensate. We describes the hidden lep- It is proposed that the Higgs scalar boson itself is a vir-
ton condensate first, and the adoption of the hidden lep- tual zero-energy scalar boson without permanent energy
ton condensate later. The hidden lepton condensate is to avoid the cosmological constant problem from the
similar to the top quark condensate. The top quark con- huge gravitational effect by the non-zero-energy Higgs
densate is a composite field composed of the top quark boson [17]. Without permanent energy, the Higgs boson
and its antiquark. The top quark condenses with its meas- emerges and disappears by borrowing energy from and
ured mass (173 GeV) comparable to the mass of the W returning energy to the particles in the electroweak in-
and Z Bosons, so Vladimir Miransky, Masaharu Tana- teraction, respectively. The returning of energy from the
bashi, and Koichi Yamawaki [12] proposed that the top Higgs scalar boson to the particles is through the absorp-
quark condensate is responsible for the mass of the W tion of the Higgs scalar boson by the particles. When a
and Z bosons. The top quark condensate is analogous to massless particle in the electroweak interaction absorbs
Cooper pairs in a BCS superconductor and nucleons in the Higgs scalar boson, the Higgs scalar boson becomes
the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model [13]. Anna Hasenfratz the longitudinal component of the massless particle, re-
and Peter Hasenfratz et al. [14] claimed that the top sulting in the massive particle and the disappearance of
quark condensate is approximately equivalent to a Higgs the Higgs scalar boson.
scalar field. S. F. King proposed a tau lepton condensate The observed Higgs boson at the LHC is a remnant of
to feed the tau mass to the muon and the electron [15,16]. the Higgs boson. At the beginning of the universe, all
By analogy to the top quark condensate, the hidden particles in the electroweak interaction were massless.
lepton condensate is a field composed of the hidden lep- The Higgs boson appeared by borrowing energy sym-
tons and antileptons , , , and as shown in metrically from all particles in the electroweak interac-
Table 2. Just as the observed top quark is a bare quark tion. The Higgs boson coupled with all massless particles,
with the observed mass of about 173 GeV instead of including leptons, quarks, and gauge bosons, in the elec-
about 346 GeV for top quark-antitop quark, the observed troweak interaction. All massless particles except photon
hidden lepton is a bare average hidden lepton instead of as the gauge boson for electromagnetism absorbed the
, and , .However, unlike the top quark con- Higgs boson as their longitudinal components to become
densate, the hidden lepton condensate is outside of the massive particles. The asymmetrical returning of energy
standard three lepton-quark families in the Standard from the Higgs boson by the absorption of the Higgs
Model. Being forbidden, a single hidden lepton cannot boson is called the symmetrical breaking of the elec-
exist alone, so the hidden leptons must exist in the lepton troweak interaction in the Standard Model. In the cases
condensate as the composite of the leptons-antileptons of such massive particles, including leptons, quarks, and
, , , and . weak gauge bosons, the Higgs boson disappeared. In the
To match l8 () at d = 8, quarks include q8 at d = 8 as a case of massless photon as the gauge boson of electro-
part of the t quark. In the same way that q7 = 3 , q8 in- magnetism, the un-absorbed Higgs boson became the
volves . is the sum of e, , and 8 (auxiliary di- remnant of the Higgs boson.
mensional leptons). Using Equation (14) of Ref. [3], the Being specific to the electroweak interaction, the rem-
mass of 8 equals to 3/2 of the mass of B7, which is Z0, nant of the Higgs boson could not return the borrowed
and the mass of 8 equals to 3/2 of the mass of B7 , energy to any other massless particles, so it adopted the
which is W±. From these we can calculate the masses of existence of another scalar boson, and returned the pure
and . borrowed energy without the longitudinal component to
3 photon. Essentially, the remnant of the Higgs boson be-
8 Z 0 came an avatar as a life born in the form of another life.
2
The remnant of the Higgs boson could not adopt the ex-
60 70 7 2 80 81
istence of any scalar boson that already represented an
e 7 8 independent elementary particle. The only available sca-
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. JMPD.-Y. CHUNG, R. HEFFERLIN 25
lar boson came from the scalar hidden lepton conden- bidden lepton family, outside of the three lepton fami-
sate. Consequently, the remnant of the Higgs boson as lies of the Standard Model. Being forbidden, a single
the Standard Model Higgs boson adopted the existence hidden lepton cannot exist alone; so it must exist in the
of the hidden lepton condensate, and became the Avatar lepton condensate as a composite of and hid-
Higgs boson. den leptons and their corresponding antileptons. The
The two possibilities for the Standard Model Higgs calculated average mass of the hidden lepton condensate
boson that adopts the hidden lepton condensate are the is 128.8 GeV in good agreements with the observed 125
pure Standard Model Higgs boson and the dual particle or 126 GeV.
consisting of the Standard Model Higgs boson and the
non-Standard Model hidden lepton condensate. The de-
cay of the pure Standard Model Higgs boson follows the
REFERENCES
decay modes of the Standard Model. [1] R. Hefferlin, “Molecular Taxonomy: String, Quark, Had-
Being outside of the Standard Model of the elec- ron, Nuclear, Atomic and Chemical Molecule Periodic or
Invariant Systems,” LAP LAMBERT Academic Publish-
troweak interaction, the hidden lepton condensate cannot
ing, Saarbrücken, 2011.
decay into the particles in the electroweak interaction,
and decay into diphoton via the internal annihilation of- [2] R. Hefferlin, “Molecular Taxonomy: String, Quark, Had-
ron, Nuclear, Atomic and Chemical Molecule Periodic or
particle-antiparticle. As a result, the decay of the dual Invariant Systems,” LAP LAMBERT Academic Publish-
particle generates excess diphoton deviated from the ing, Section 7, 2011. pp. 35-38
Standard Model. The experimental evidence for the ex- [3] D. Chung, “The Periodic System of Elementary Particles
cess diphoton is inconclusive [18-20]. and the Composition of Hadrons,” Speculations in Sci-
ence and Technology, Vol. 20, 1997, pp. 259-268
4. Summary http://arxiv.org/ftp/hep-th/papers/0111/0111147.pdf
[4] The ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a New Parti-
It is proposed that all elementary particles including lep-
cle in the Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson
tons, quarks, and gauge bosons can be placed in the pe- with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC,” 2012.
riodic system of elementary particles. The periodicity is arXiv:1207.7235v1[hep-ex]
derived from the two sets of seven mass orbitals where [5] The CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a New Boson at
seven comes from the seven extra dimensions in the a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the
eleven-dimensional membrane in the string theory. The LHC,” 2012. arXiv:1207.7235v1[hep-ex]
calculated constituent masses are in good agreement with [6] D. Chung and V. Krasnoholovets, “The Cosmic Organ-
the observed values by using only four known constants: ism Theory,” Scientific Inquiry, Vol. 8, 2007, pp. 165-182.
the number of the extra spatial dimensions in the http://www.iigss.net/Scientific-Inquiry/Dec07/3-krasnoho
eleven-dimensional membrane, the mass of electron, the lovets.pdf
mass of Z boson, and the fine structure constant. [7] A. Salam, “Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions,” In:
It is proposed that the Higgs boson itself is a virtual W. Svartholm, Ed., Elementary Particle Theory, Alm-
quist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968, pp. 367-387.
zero-energy gauge boson by borrowing energy from and
returning energy to the particles in the electroweak in- [8] J. Beringe, et al., (Particle Data Group), “Electroweak
Model and Constraints on New Physics,” Physical Re-
teraction. When a massless particle in the electroweak view D, Vol. 86, 2012, Article ID: 010001.
interaction absorbs the Higgs boson, the Higgs boson http://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/reviews/rpp2012-rev-standard-mo
becomes the longitudinal component of the massless par- del.pdf
ticle, resulting in the massive particle. At the beginning [9] D. Griffiths, “Introduction to Elementary Particles,”
of the universe, all particles in the electroweak interac- WILEY-VCH, Hoboken, 2008, p. 135
tion were massless. The symmetrical borrowing of en- [10] M. H. MacGregor, “Electron Generation of Leptons and
ergy from the particles and the asymmetrical returning of Hadrons with Conjugate α-Quantized Lifetimes and
energy by the absorption of the Higgs boson resulted in Masses,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, Vol.
the asymmetrical breaking of electroweak interaction and 20, No. 4, 2005, pp. 719-798.
the remnant of the Higgs boson from the absence of the [11] J. Beringer, et al., (Particle Data Group), “Electroweak
absorption of the Higgs boson by photon. The remnant of Model and Constraints on New Physics,” Physical Re-
view D, Vol. 86, 2012, Article ID: 010001.
the Higgs boson adopted the existence of the scalar hid-
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/reviews/rpp2012-rev-top-quark.pd
den lepton condensate and returned the borrowed energy f
to photon.
[12] V. A. Miransky, M. Tanabashi and K. Yamawaki, “Is the
The observed Higgs Boson at the LHC is the Standard t Quark Responsible for the Mass of W and Z Bosons,”
Model Higgs boson that adopts the existence of the hid- Modern Physics Letter A, Vol. 4, No. 11, 1989, pp. 1043-
den lepton condensate. The hidden lepton is in the for- 1063. doi:10.1142/S0217732389001210
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. JMP26 D.-Y. CHUNG, R. HEFFERLIN
[13] Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, “Dynamical Model of [17] S. Weinberg, “The Cosmological Constant Problem,”
Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Super- Review Modern Physics, Vol. 61, No. 1, 1989, pp. 1-23.
conductivity, II,” Physical Review, Vol. 124, No. 1, 1961, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1
pp. 246-254. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.124.246 [18] P. P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, “Is
[14] A. Hasenfratz, P. Hasenfratz, K. Jansen, J. Kuti and Y. the Resonance at 125 GeV the Higgs Boson?” 2012.
Shen, “The Equivalence of the Top Quark Condensate arXiv:1207.1347v1 [hep-ph]
and the Elementary Higgs Field,” Nuclear Physics B, Vol. [19] K. R. Bland, (for the CDF, D0 Collaborations), “Search
365, No. 1, 1991, pp. 79-97. for the Higgs boson in H- > γγ Decays in $p\bar{p}$ Col-
doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90607-Y lisions at 1.96 TeV,” 2012. arXiv:1110.1747v1[hep-ex]
[15] S. F. King, “Four-Family Lepton Mixing,” Physical Re- [20] M. Strassler, “CMS Sees No Excess in Higgs Decays to
view D, Vol. 46, 1992, pp. 4804-4807. Photons,” 2013.
[16] S. F. King, “Low Scale Technicolour at LEP,” Physics http://profmattstrassler.com/2013/03/14/cms-sees-no-exce
Letter B, Vol. 314, No. 3-4, 1993, pp. 364-370. ss-in-higgs-decays-to-photons/#more-5655
doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91250-Q
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. JMPYou can also read
