The effects of walking, running, and shoe size on foot volumetrics

Page created by Jamie Owens
 
CONTINUE READING
Physical Therapy in Sport 4 (2003) 87–92
                                                                                                                    www.elsevier.com/locate/yptsp

      The effects of walking, running, and shoe size on foot volumetrics
            J. Wesley McWhorter*, Harvey Wallmann, Merrill Landers, Beth Altenburger,
                             Laura LaPorta-Krum, Peter Altenburger
             Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, The University of Nevada, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Box 453029,
                                                          Las Vegas, NV 89154-3029, USA

Abstract
Objectives. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of walking and running on foot volumetrics, and its relationship between
measured foot size and preferred shoe size.
Design. This study was a single-group, repeated measures design. Twenty-eight physical therapy students participated in the testing.
Methods. Following 10 min of supine rest, a pre-exercise volumetric measurement of the right leg was obtained. Shoe size and foot length
measurements were taken. Subjects were randomly assigned to a treatment condition (walking or running). The treadmill speed was set at a
comfortable pace for each participant during exercise. Foot volume measurements were taken after the exercise. Subjects returned the next
week to participate in the second condition.
Results. Paired t-tests were used to compare differences in outcome variables. Significant increases in fluid volumes were noted within groups
after walking (2%) and running (3%) and between groups in the post-walk and post-run values (1.7%). A weak positive correlation was noted
between changes in volume during running and the measured difference between foot size and shoe size (r ¼ 0:39; p ¼ 0:038).
Conclusions. Treadmill running for 10 min may lead to significantly greater foot volume compared to treadmill walking for the same period.
Results also demonstrate that the greater the measured difference between shoe size and foot size, the greater the foot volume after running.
q 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Brannock device; Blood pressure; Physical therapy

1. Introduction                                                                In particular, running and jogging have been shown to
                                                                               increase foot and ankle volume (Stick et al. 1992; Chalk
   Health care practitioners commonly prescribe and or                         et al. 1995; Cloughley & Mawdsley 1995; Emby 1997;
recommend aerobic type activities for those patients seeking                   Lazzarini et al. 1997). In the young or recreational athlete,
to improve their cardiovascular fitness. These aerobic                         the small changes which occur as a result of running would
activities often include walking or running programs. It                       not be a problem. However, in the older adult or geriatric
has been demonstrated, however, that weight bearing                            patient, these small increases in foot volume when added to
activities such as walking or running can lead to foot and                     the prior conditions of chronic resting oedema, fibrosis, joint
ankle swelling (Stick et al. 1992; Chalk et al. 1995;                          stiffness, contractures, pain and dysfunction could prove to
Cloughley & Mawdsley 1995). A common complication                              be harmful (Sorenson 1989; Guyton & Hall 2000).
resulting from weight bearing activities and which can lead                        Previous researchers have examined the relationship
to more serious foot problems is oedema (Evanski 1982;                         between changes in foot and ankle volume during daily
Shereff 1987; Stick et al. 1992; Gordon & Cuttic 1994;                         activities and exercise (Chalk et al. 1995; Cloughley &
Cloughley & Mawdsley 1995).                                                    Mawdsley 1995; Moholkar & Fenelon 2001). In their study
   Evidence exists demonstrating increases in interstitial                     involving nine volleyball players, Chalk et al. (1995)
and intracellular volume during and after exercise,                            reported no changes in foot volume before and after
especially as it relates to workload (Jacobbsson & Kjellmer                    workouts. Cloughley and Mawdsley (1995) examined 21
1964; Lundvall et al. 1972; Baker & David 1974; Schnizer                       subjects during walking and running. They reported a
et al. 1979; Stick et al. 1985; McGough & Zurwasky 1991).                      change in foot and ankle volume with running as compared
                                                                               to walking using the Lucite foot volumeter measuring
 * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ 1-70-2895-2629; fax: þ1-70-2895-4883.         device. Foot and ankle volumes increased by an average of
   E-mail address: jmcwhorter@ccmail.nevada.edu (J.W. McWhorter).              17.9 ml during walking, while increasing 31.2 ml after
1466-853X/03/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S1466-853X(03)00031-2
88                                 J.W. McWhorter et al. / Physical Therapy in Sport 4 (2003) 87–92

                                                       Fig. 1. Lucite volumeter.

running ðp ¼ 0:02Þ: However, they did not address if                   following the manufacturer’s guidelines. In addition, foot
changes in volume occurred within the walking or running               measurements were taken using the Brannock device (Fig. 2)
groups or how this related to shoe size.                               which is designed and calibrated for the correct fitting of
    Few studies have investigated the effects of running and           athletic footwear (Brannock Device, Syracuse, NY, USA).
walking on foot volumetrics (Stick et al. 1992; Cloughley &               There are several studies establishing the reliability and
Mawdsley 1995). In addition, only the paper by Chalk et al.            validity of obtaining foot/ankle oedema from foot volume-
(1995) has reported the relationship between shoe size and             try (Cloughley & Mawdsley 1995; Khiabani et al. 1999a,b;
changes in foot volume before and after exercise.                      Moholkar & Fenelon 2001). A pilot test was performed
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the                   previously in order to allow the tester to practice taking foot
relationship between running and walking foot volumetrics,             volumetric measurements. Analysis of the pilot data
and its relationship between measured foot size and
preferred shoe size. This research will serve as a pilot
study for future research to investigate the relationship of
exercise and oedema in the older athletic population and
how exercise intensity and weight bearing status might
influence these changes.

2. Method

2.1. Subjects

   The subjects consisted of 13 females and 15 male physical
therapy student volunteers without a history of musculoske-
letal injuries, health problems or surgery to the lower
extremities. The age range was from 22 to 34 years with a
mean of 27.1 ^ 3.7 years. Their self assessed individual
activity levels ranged from sedentary to moderately active.

2.2. Instrumentation

   All measurements were obtained using a lucite, foot
volumeter set (Fig. 1) which included the volumeter
container, an obturator which was used to calibrate the
water levels prior to each measurement, a receiver to catch
the water overflow, and a 1000-ml graduated cylinder with
10-ml graduations (Foot Volumeter, P.O. Box 146,
Idyllwild, CA. 92349). All measurements were taken                                 Fig. 2. Brannock shoe size measuring instrument.
J.W. McWhorter et al. / Physical Therapy in Sport 4 (2003) 87–92                                          89

Table 1
Reliability intra-class correlation of pilot study

                   Between subject SS           Between subject df           Between sject MS       Error SS          Error df        Error MS     RICC

Pre-walk           43864                        3                            14621.33                 6.0             4                1.5         0.999
Post-walk          47116.37                     3                            15705.45               127.5             4               31.875       0.998
Pre-run            44155.37                     3                            14718.45                15.5             4                3.875       0.999
Post-run           49909.37                     3                            16636.45                 7.5             4                1.875       0.999

   RICC ; reliability intra-class correlation; RICC ; (MS Between Subjects      MS Error) 4 MS between subjects.

demonstrated a reliability intra-class correlation coefficient                      instructed to slowly lower the right foot into the volumeter.
(RICC) of.99 (Payton 1994) (Table 1).                                               At this time, resting blood pressure and heart rates were
   The displaced water was captured in a plastic container                          recorded. Prior to the exercise sessions, all subjects were
and subsequently measured in a graduated cylinder. All data                         instructed to bring their athletic footwear and their shoe size
was immediately recorded on a personalized data sheet. As                           was recorded. In addition, the right foot size was measured
water has a tendency to creep up the sides of the plastic                           with the Brannock device and recorded in the US sizes. A
cylinder, measurements were taken from the lowest level at                          conversion chart for UK and European sizes is available at
the water line. Each volume measurement was inspected by                            the Brannock web site: http://www.brannock.com.
two researchers and the average of the two observations was                             The treadmill speed for both exercise sessions was set at
recorded.                                                                           a comfortable pace for each individual participant. Due to
                                                                                    the fact that walking and running speeds vary greatly among
                                                                                    individuals, it was felt that allowing each individual to
3. Procedure                                                                        determine their own speed would more closely mimic a real
                                                                                    life scenario (Winter 1984; Rodgers 1988).
3.1. Design                                                                             Each exercise session lasted 10 min and was preceded by
                                                                                    a 5-minute warm-up session. The warm-up sessions
   All subjects were tested during walking and running and                          consisted of light stretching of the lower extremities. Prior
thus served as their own controls. The subjects were given a                        to beginning the exercise session, each subject performed a
group instructional session at which time all aspects of the                        2-minute warm-up session on the treadmill at which time
research study was explained and possible complications as                          they gradually increased their speed until they felt
a result of participation were discussed. During this session                       comfortable.
each subject read and signed an informed consent.                                       Following each exercise session, a 2-minute cool-down
                                                                                    period on the treadmill was performed which consisted of
3.2. Exercise sessions                                                              slow walking. Immediately following both exercise sessions,
                                                                                    heart rates and blood pressures were measured followed by
   All subjects were required to rest in a supine position for                      volumetric measurements. All subjects were required to
10 min prior to testing. The activity for the first condition                       remain in the lab until blood pressure and heart rate values
(walking or running) was randomly chosen by a flip of a                             returned to pre-exercise levels. The second exercise
coin. A pre-exercise volumetric measurement of the right                            condition was scheduled one week later. All procedures
leg was obtained in the sitting position. The subjects were                         were performed in a consistent manner for both sessions.

Table 2
Comparison of fluid volume changes during walking and running

Mode of exercise ðN ¼ 28Þ                % Volume changes               Mean volume (ml)             Standard error              t-values        p-values

Pre-walk                                 2                              650.04                       40.19                       3.023           0.005
Post-walk                                                               662.64                       40.61
Pre-run                                  3                              654.21                       41.07                       3.909           0.001
Post-run                                                                674.43                       39.36

Pre-walk                                 0%                             650.04                       40.19                       709.0           0.484
Pre-run                                                                 654.21                       41.07

Post-walk                                1.7%                           662.64                       40.61                       3.516           0.002
Post-run                                                                674.43                       39.36

   Alpha level 2p ¼ 0:05:
90                                        J.W. McWhorter et al. / Physical Therapy in Sport 4 (2003) 87–92

Table 3
Male and female differences for fluid volume changes during walking and running

Mode of exercise ðN ¼ 15Þ            % Volume changes               Mean volume (ml)                   Standard error            t value           p value

A. Male
Pre-walk                             0                              762.40                             50.93                     1.031             0.320
Post-walk                                                           768.53                             52.66
Pre-run                              3                              761.13                             53.40                     2.216             0.044
Post-run                                                            781.07                             50.23

Pre-walk                             0                              762.40                             50.93                     0.128             0.900
Pre-run                                                             761.13                             53.40

Post-walk                            2                              768.53                             52.66                     2.645             0.019
Post-run                                                            781.07                             50.23
B. Female
Pre-walk                             4                              520.38                             41.50                     3.794             0.003
Post-walk                                                           540.46                             44.00
Pre-run                              4                              530.85                             44.36                     4.514             0.001
Post-run                                                            551.38                             41.91
Pre-walk                             2                              520.38                             41.50                     1.939             0.076
Pre-run                                                             530.85                             44.36
Post-walk                            2                              540.46                             44.00                     2.225             0.046
Post-run                                                            551.38                             41.91

     Alpha level 2p ¼ 0:05:

4. Data analysis                                                             were noted between pre-walk and post-walk volumes ð p ¼
                                                                             0:320Þ or pre-walk and pre-run volumes ð p ¼ 0:900Þ:
   Fluid volume data were analyzed using the SPSS                            Females showed significant changes in pre-walk and post-
statistical package for Windowsw, release 10.0. Means                        walk volumes ð p ¼ 0:003Þ; pre-run and post-run volumes
and standard errors were calculated for the outcome                          ð p ¼ 0:001Þ; and post-walk and post-run volumes ð p ¼
variables. Given the normal distribution of data, paired t-                  0:046Þ: No changes were noted between pre-walk and pre-
tests were used to compare differences in outcome variables                  run volumes ð p ¼ 0:076Þ:
between pre and post-test means for both groups. The alpha
level was set at 0.05.                                                       5.3. Correlation between differences in foot and shoe sizes
                                                                             and volume changes in running

5. Results                                                                      A weak positive correlation was noted between changes
                                                                             in volume during running and the differences between foot
5.1. Comparison of fluid volume changes during                               size and shoe size (r ¼ 0:39; p ¼ 0:038) (Table 4). In other
walking and running                                                          words, there was a greater volume change when the shoe size
                                                                             was greater than the foot size. The correlation was calculated
   Comparisons of pre and post data for walking and                          by first finding the differences between foot size and shoe
running groups are reported in Table 2. Significant mean                     size. This difference was then correlated to the difference
increases in fluid volume were noted after walking ð p ¼
                                                                             Table 4
0:005Þ and after running ð p ¼ 0:001Þ: No difference was                     Correlation between differences in foot and shoe size and pre to post
noted between the pre-walk and pre-run groups ð p ¼                          volume changes in walking and running
0:484Þ: A significant difference was noted between the
groups in post-walk and post-run values ð p ¼ 0:002Þ:                                                    Pre to post running   Difference between foot size
                                                                                                         volume changes        and shoe size

5.2. Gender differences                                                      Pre to post walking         20.11a (0.579)b       20.09a (0.668)b
                                                                             volume changes
   When participants were divided by gender (Table 3),                       Pre to post running                                 0.39a (0.038)b
males showed significant changes in pre-run and post-run                     volume changes
volumes ð p ¼ 0:044Þ as well as significant changes in post-                      a
                                                                                      Pearson correlation coefficient.
walk and post-run volumes ð p ¼ 0:019Þ: No differences                            b
                                                                                      Alpha level 2p ¼ 0:05:
J.W. McWhorter et al. / Physical Therapy in Sport 4 (2003) 87–92                              91

Table 5                                                                            Differences in fluid volumes after walking or running
Paired samples test of foot size and shoe size                                  activities were also found to be significant based on gender
Paired         Paired         Paired         t           df     Sig.            (Table 3). A review of the literature failed to identify any
difference     difference     difference                        (2-tailed)      studies of post exercise foot and ankle volume changes
mean           SD             SEM                                               based on gender. The one study by Chalk et al. (1995)
                                                                                demonstrated a slight non-significant reduction in foot
20.554         0.416          7.86E-02       27.044      27     0.000           volume in female inter-collegiate volleyball players after a
   Alpha 2p ¼ 0:05:                                                             2-hour rigorous session (Chalk et al. 1995).
                                                                                   Both groups of males and female participants demon-
between pre-running volume and post-running volume                              strated significant increases in volume after running on the
values. Pair samples t-test revealed a significant difference                   treadmill. In addition, the female participants showed
between foot size and shoe size ðp ¼ 0:00Þ (Table 5).                           significant changes after walking whereas the male
                                                                                participants did not demonstrate these changes. When
                                                                                comparing walking to running, both groups exhibited
6. Discussion                                                                   similar significant increases in running over walking.
                                                                                   Measured foot size compared to preferred shoe size
    The data from this study showed that, in healthy                            also demonstrated a significant positive correlation. It was
individuals, running and walking resulted in significant                        found that as the measured difference between foot size
increases in foot and ankle fluid volumes compared to                           and shoe size increased there was a resultant increase in
resting measurements. Additionally, when comparing run-                         foot/ankle volume. Consequently, having shoes that are
ning to walking, running demonstrated significantly greater                     too large could further exacerbate the problems of
changes than walking. These findings agree with other                           increased foot volume associated with running. In
studies investigating the relationship between foot/ankle                       addition, the authors suggest having a shoe that is too
oedema and weight bearing activities (Sorenson 1989; Stick                      short (decreased length) and or too tight (decreased width)
et al. 1992; Chalk et al. 1995; Cloughley & Mawdsley 1995;                      could greatly compress the foot. This could have the
Lazzarini et al. 1997; Guyton & Hall 2000; Moholkar &                           detrimental effect of traumatizing the joints of the foot
Fenelon 2001). In addition, it was found that shoe size                         and the relationship of the metatarso-phalangeal joints to
demonstrated a positive correlation with foot and ankle fluid                   the shoe break. Therefore, the authors recommend that
volumes. If the shoe size was greater than the measured foot                    using shoes that are appropriate in size is as important as
size, then there was a greater potential for increased volume                   choosing shoes for a specific activity, especially in those
changes with running.                                                           experiencing oedema problems.
    The increase in foot and ankle volumes during running                          Proper shoe fitting incorporates not only overall length
and walking can be attributed to the increase in blood flow                     (heel to toe measurement) but also arch length (heel to first
to the exercising muscles. As a result of this increased blood                  metatarsal head) measurement. Shoes are designed to flex at
flow, there is a shift of capillary fluid into the interstitial                 the ‘ball’ of the foot. Therefore, correct fitting properly
spaces (Stick et al. 1992; Chalk et al. 1995; Cloughley &                       positions the first metatarsal joint in the widest part of the
Mawdsley 1995; Gellman & Burns 1996; Lazzarini et al.                           shoe and provides room for the toes (at least 1 cm from the
1997; Guyton & Hall 2000). This increase in oedema                              end of the shoe) so they are not confined. In addition, for an
following exercise has been shown to increase foot volume                       appropriately sized shoe to fit correctly, an adequate lacing
by as much as 8% (Chalk et al. 1995). Stegall has                               system or adjustable strap is required.
demonstrated an 80 mmHg drop in venous pressure at the                             In a random sample by the primary author of 5 athletic
saphenous vein in the ankle during running as compared to                       shoe stores, it was found that the majority of shoe store
quiet standing (Stegall 1966). As a result, it has been                         vendors would recommend shoe purchases based solely on
suggested that there is an inability of the lower extremities                   comfort. In this sample, only 1 out of the 5 stores offered to
to maintain a steady rate of venous return following                            take foot measurements and make recommendations based
vigorous weight bearing activities.                                             on those measurements. The authors believe that it is
    This study demonstrated a 3% increase in foot volume                        common for athletic shoe store employees to recommend a
after 10 min of light running on a treadmill. Walking for the                   shoe one full size greater than the measured size. The vast
same amount of time resulted in foot volume changes of                          majority of adults have not had their feet measured for many
approximately 50% less than that for running. An increase                       years and are purchasing their athletic shoes based on
in running foot volume of this magnitude could result in                        measurements taken many years prior. In this study, it was
further constriction of venous return with possible patho-                      found that shoe size was significantly greater than measured
logical consequences in those with compromised circulation                      foot size. Miller et al. (2000) found that shoe fit was not
(Beskin 1997). The relationship between statistical                             related to comfort, and therefore, new shoe purchases
significance and clinical relevance of percentage changes                       should be based on measured shoe size as well as comfort
has yet to be determined.                                                       (Miller et al. 2000).
92                                        J.W. McWhorter et al. / Physical Therapy in Sport 4 (2003) 87–92

   These findings should give all health care practitioners,                 Emby, D.J., 1997. Foot ischaemia due to too-tight laces. South African
especially those directly involved in recommending athletic                      Medical Journal 87 (11), 1560.
                                                                             Evanski, P., 1982. The geriatric foot: disorders of the foot, WB Saunders,
footwear, a better understanding of which types of activities
                                                                                 Philadelphia, p. 964–978.
to prescribe for their patients in which foot and ankle                      Gellman, R., Burns, S., 1996. Walking aches and running pains: injuries of
oedema may be a problem. These recommendations should                            the foot and ankle. Primary Care 23 (2), 263–280.
include those patients with venous insufficiency and                         Gordon, G.M., Cuttic, M.M., 1994. Exercise and the ageing foot. Southern
lymphatic drainage problems as well as those individuals                         Medical Journal 87 (5), 36 –41.
recovering from acute swelling resulting from foot or ankle                  Guyton, A.C., Hall, J.E., 2000. Textbook of medical physiology, WB
                                                                                 Saunders, Philadelphia, chapter 31, p. 404 –413.
injury. Combining the correct type of activity along with
                                                                             Jacobbsson, S., Kjellmer, I., 1964. Accumulation of fluid in exercising
choosing the correct footwear (based on accurate foot                            skeletal muscle. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 60 (3), 286–292.
measurements) will greatly improve the participant’s ability                 Khiabani, H.Z., Anvar, M.D., Rostad, B., Standen, E., Kroese, A.J., 1999.
to control oedema and minimize serious foot complications.                       The distribution of oedema in the lower limb of patients with chronic
                                                                                 critical limb ishcaemia. a study with computed tomography. Journal for
                                                                                 Vascular Diseases 28 (4), 265–270.
                                                                             Khiabani, H.Z., Anvar, M.D., Stranden, E., Slagsvold, C.E., Kroese, A.J.,
7. Conclusion
                                                                                 1999. Oedema in the lower limb of patients with chronic critical limb
                                                                                 ischaemia. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 17
   Results of this study indicate that treadmill jogging for                     (5), 419– 423.
10 min can lead to significant increases in foot volume as                   Lazzarini, K.M., Troiano, R.N., Smith, R.C., 1997. Can running cause the
compared to treadmill walking for the same amount of time                        appearance of marrow edema on MR images of the foot and ankle?
in young healthy adults. Also, correct fit of athletic footwear                  Radiology 202 (2), 540 –542.
                                                                             Lundvall, J.S., Mellander, S., Westling, H., White, T., 1972. Fluid transfer
is an important component in controlling increases in foot
                                                                                 between blood and tissues during exercise. Acta Physiologica
and ankle volume during exercise. Further investigations                         Scandanavica 85 (2), 258–269.
should look into the effects of these types of activities in the             McGough, C., Zurwasky, M.L., 1991. Effect of exercise on volumetric and
older athletic populations or those who have additional                          sensory status of the asymptomatic hand. Journal of Hand Therapy 4,
lower extremity pathologies such as venous insufficiency                         177 –180.
and lymphatic drainage problems.                                             Miller, J.E., Nigg, B.M., Liu, W., Stefanyshyn, D.J., Nurse, M.A., 2000.
                                                                                 Influence of foot, leg and shoe characteristics on subjective comfort.
                                                                                 Foot and Ankle International 21 (9), 759– 767.
                                                                             Moholkar, K., Fenelon, G., 2001. Diurnal variations in volume of the
Acknowledgements                                                                 foot and ankle. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 40 (5),
                                                                                 302 –304.
   The authors would like to thank the following students                    Payton, O., 1994. Research, The Validation of Clinical Practice, 3rd edn,
from the Department of Physical Therapy, University of                           Philadelphia, F.A. Davis Company, chapter 6, pp. 111–124.
Nevada, Las Vegas for their assistance in this research                      Rodgers, M.M., 1988. Dynamic biomechanics of the normal foot and ankle
                                                                                 during walking and running. Physical Therapy 68 (12), 1822–1830.
project: Blaine Archibald, Anne Beal, Allan Smith, Cheryl                    Schnizer, W.H., Hinneberg, H., Moser, H., Kuper, K., 1979. Intra- and
Cardillo, Wendy Hubbard, and Bernadette Romero.                                  extravascular volume changes in the human forearm after static hand
                                                                                 grip exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occu-
                                                                                 pational Physiology 41 (2), 131–140.
References                                                                   Shereff, M.J., 1987. Geriatric foot disorders, how to avoid undertreating
                                                                                 them. Geriatrics 42 (10), 69–80.
Baker, C.H., David, D.L., 1974. Isolated skeletal muscle blood flow and      Sorenson, M.K., 1989. The edematous hand. Physical Therapy 69 (12),
   volume changes during contractile activity. Blood Vessels 11 (1–2),           1059–1064.
   32–44.                                                                    Stegall, H., 1966. Muscle pumping in the dependent leg. Circulation
Beskin, J.L., 1997. Nerve entrapment syndromes of the foot and ankle.            Research 19, 180.
   Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons 5 (5),             Stick, C., Stofen, P., Witzleb, E., 1985. On physiological edema in man’s
   261– 269.                                                                     lower extremity. European Journal of Applied Physiology and
Chalk, P.J., McPoil, T., Cornwall, M., 1995. Variations in foot volume           Occupational Physiology 54 (4), 442 –449.
   before and after exercise. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical      Stick, C., Jaeger, H., Witzleb, E., 1992. Measurements of volume changes
   Association 85 (9), 470 –472.                                                 and venous pressure in the human lower leg during walking and
Cloughley, W.B., Mawdsley, R.H., 1995. Effect of running on volume of            running. Journal of Applied Physiology 72 (6), 2063–2068.
   the foot and ankle. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy 22      Winter, D., 1984. Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability
   (4), 151–154.                                                                 and compensating effects. Human Movement Science 3, 51– 76.
You can also read