The Effect of Sodium Fluoride on Prokaryotes - Jorge Reyes-Arbujas Grade 10 Central Catholic High School
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Effect of Sodium Fluoride on Prokaryotes Jorge Reyes-Arbujas Grade 10 Central Catholic High School
Background Information • Sodium fluoride is known for its toxicity at high concentrations • The lethal human dose-32 to 64 mg/kg body weight • active ingredient in toothpaste • Fluoridation is the process of putting sodium fluoride in water to prevent tooth decay • Fluoridation has been used since the 1940s
Sodium Fluoride • Fluoride salts are used to enhance the strength of teeth by the formation of fluorapatite, a naturally occurring component of tooth enamel
Escherichia coli • Large and diverse group of gram (-) bacteria Surrounded by an extra cell wall composed of lipopolysaccharides • Free living, symbiont, or pathogen • Common prokaryotic cell model
Purpose: • To determine if sodium fluoride has an effect on E. coli survivorship.
Hypotheses: • Null hypothesis: Sodium fluoride will not have a significant effect on the survivorship of E.coli • Alternative hypothesis: Sodium fluoride will significantly reduce the survivorship of E. coli
Materials o Labeling tape o Sodium o Ethanol Fluoride(0.01g/100mL) o SDF (sterile dilution fluid) o Latex gloves (10 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM o E. coli DH5 Alpha K2HPO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.1 o Micropipettes mM CaCl2, 100 mM NaCl) o Turntable o Micro rack o Luria Broth agar plates o Micro tubes o Bunsen burner o LB media (0.5% yeast o Vortex extract, 1% tryptone, 1% o Sidearm flask sodium chloride). o Spreader bars o Luria Broth agar plates (to o Klett spectrophotometer be infused with sodium fluoride) o Incubator
Liquid Pulse Procedure 1. E. Coli was grown overnight in sterile LB media. 2. Sample of the overnight culture was added to fresh media in a sterile sidearm flask 3. The culture was incubated at 37°C until a density of 50 Klett spectrophotometer units was reached (Cell density approximately 108 cells/mL) 4. The culture was diluted in a sterile dilution fluid to a concentration of approximately 105 cells/mL 5. Sodium Fluoride was with SDF to create the following experimental concentrations:
Liquid Pulse Concentration Chart 0% 0.1% 1% 10% SDF 9.9mL 9.89mL 9.8mL 8.9mL Sodium 0mL 0.01mL 0.1mL 1mL fluoride E. Coli 0.1mL 0.1mL 0.1mL 0.1mL Total Volume 10mL 10mL 10mL 10mL
Liquid Procedure cont. 6. 100 µL of cell culture was then added to the test tubes, yielding a final volume of 10 mL and a cell density of approximately 103 cells/mL 7. The solution was then mixed by vortexing and allowed to sit at room temperature for 15 minutes 8. After vortexing to evenly suspend cells, 100 µL aliquots were removed from the tubes and spread on LB agar plates 9. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours 10. The resulting colonies were counted visually. Each colony is assumed to have risen from one cell
Infused Plate Procedure 1. The following volumes of NaF stock were spread onto LB agar plates to create the desired concentrations:200 microliters (10-4%) and 2 microliters(10-6%) 2. The plates were incubated at 37°C for an hour for infusion 3. 100 ul of E.coli suspension from the CONTROL TUBE were spread onto each infused plate 4. The plates were incubated overnight and the resulting colonies counted
Infused Plate Concentration Chart Low High SDF 198 μL 0 μL Sodium Fluoride 2 μL 200 μL
NaF Effects on E.coli Survivorship(Liquid Pulse Experiment) 600 500 400 Colony count 300 200 100 0 0% 0.10% 1% 10% concentrations
Statistical Analyses • ANOVA: Single Factor • Dunnett’s Test – Analysis of Variation – Statistical test that – Statistical test that compares an compares the means of experimental group multiple groups directly to the control – P-value from ANOVA group testing identifies – Identifies that the significance if P-value is experimental group is < 0.05 significantly different than the control if t- value > t-crit
Liquid Pulse-ANOVA • The P-Value Anova: Single Factor shows that SUMMARY there is no Groups Count Sum Average Variance Column 1 Column 2 8 8 4744 4722 593 590.25 32.57143 30.78571 significant Column 3 Column 4 8 8 4719 589.875 4685 585.625 22.69643 49.41071 effect ANOVA Source of VariationSS df MS F P-value F crit Between Groups222.625 3 74.20833 2.191229 0.111274 2.946685 Within Groups948.25 28 33.86607 Total 1170.875 31 Alpha:0.05 P-Value=0.111274
NaF Effects on E.coli Survivorship(Infused Plate Experiment) P-Value=0.03293 600 500 400 Colony Count 300 200 100 0 0% Low High Concentrations
Infused Plate-ANOVA Anova: Single Factor SUMMARY • The P-Value shows us Groups Count Sum Average Variance Column 1 Column 2 3 3 1788 596 79 1793 597.6667 60.33333 that there is a Column 3 3 1736 578.6667 17.33333 significant effect. ANOVA Source of VariationSS df MS F P-value F crit Between Groups 664.2222 2 332.1111 6.359574 0.03293 5.143253 Within Groups 313.3333 6 52.22222 Total 977.5556 8 Alpha:0.05
Dunnett’s Test: Infused Plate Variable T-Value Interpretation Concentrations T-Crit=3.6 Sodium Fluoride Low 0.0282 Not Significant High 3.22 No Significant
Conclusions • Liquid Pulse experiment-null accepted – no significant effect revealed • Infused plate experiment –null accepted – No significant effect revealed
Limitations • Slight lag in synchronization of plating • Inability to count the exact amount of cells on each plate • Limited sodium fluoride exposures • Only one exposure time • Only survivorship assessed
Future Changes • More trials • Different microbe • Growth curve • Varying exposures and exposure times • Synergistic effects
References • www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927 595 • www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/68511 • http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/
You can also read