Technologies For Conversion Of Unconventional and Renewable Feedstocks From BP - Philip M J Hill, BP International
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Technologies For Conversion Of Unconventional and Renewable Feedstocks From BP Philip M J Hill, BP International
Disclaimer Copyright © 2013 , 2014 BP plc. All rights reserved. Contents of this presentation do not necessarily reflect the Company’s views. This presentation and its contents have been provided to you for informational purposes only. This information is not advice on or a recommendation of any of the matters described herein or any related commercial transactions. BP is not responsible for any inaccuracies in the information contained herein. BP makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, reasonableness or completeness of the information, assumptions or analysis contained herein or in any supplemental materials, and BP accepts no liability in connection therewith. BP deals and trades in energy related products and may have positions consistent with or different from those implied or suggested by this presentation. This presentation also contains forward-looking statements. Any statements that are not historical facts, including statements about BP's beliefs or expectations, are forward-looking statements. These statements are based mostly on publicly available information, estimates and projections and you should not place undue reliance on them. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual future results and trends may differ materially from what is forecast, suggested or implied in any forward-looking statements in this presentation due to a variety of factors. Factors which could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, general economic conditions; conditions in the markets; behaviour of customers, suppliers, and competitors; technological developments; the implementation and execution of new processes; and changes to legal, tax, and regulatory rules. The foregoing list of factors should not be construed as exhaustive. BP disclaims any intention or obligation to publicly or privately update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Participants should seek their own advice and guidance from appropriate legal, tax, financial and trading professionals when making decisions as to positions to take in the market. 2
The CTC’s strategic purpose is to develop proprietary technologies aimed at business renewal for BP Strategic themes Access to growth regions and markets Participation options in renewable fuels and materials Enabling value from challenging feedstocks, intermediates and by-products in BP’s portfolio Leveraging in-house technology positions and capability in process development and catalysis 4
CTC is licensing four technologies with its collaboration partners Compact Reformer & Fischer-Tropsch Hummingbird® Veba Combi-Cracking (VCCTM) • A slurry phase • Conversion from • Ultra-selective second hydrocracking/hydrogen generation ethanol biomass, natural gas, ation process for converting petroleum coal and or petcoke dehydration residues and coal into via syngas to diesel technology directly marketable and naphtha at a split • Fully recycling pilot lighter products of 80% and 20% plant • Our VCCTM technology • Demonstration plant at • Identification of a was operated at 300 barrels/ day scale collaboration licensor commercial scale from • Compact reformer, has 1981 – 2000 in 3.5k bpd innovative mechanical unit in Bottrop, Germany design reducing size • 4 licenses sold, first and weight. commercial plant start up 2014 5
BP and JM Davy Process Technology (Davy) Fischer-Tropsch (FT) History BP has been actively developing FT technology since 1981 and has invested over $500 million to date 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Initiated R&D Commissioned Established Completed Technology programme Hull Pilot Plant technology co- first FT run Commercialisation operation with at Nikiski Discovered Davy cobalt based FT Sanctioned Nikiski plant met catalyst Nikiski all technical demonstration targets plant ($86m) 6
BP-Davy GTL Demonstration Unit Nikiski, Alaska - Demonstration plant met all performance targets - No negative impact to catalyst performance from (externally caused) unplanned shut downs - The catalyst was contained in thousands of commercial scale tubes - FT converter demonstrated 100% availability - 300 barrel a day scale plant - 16,000 hours on stream © BP 2013 7
Introduction BP FT Technology Widely available Natural Gas Tails Gas Recycle Hydrogen BP – Davy proprietary technology Fischer- UPGRADING UPGRADING Coal Syngas Tropsch Hydrotreater / Fractionation Generation Syngas Products Conversion cracker Resid / Pet Coke Offsites & Utilities (including air separation unit) Export Steam / Power Biomass BP FT Provides a low risk, competitive FT and upgrading technology. Syngas generation technologies are all widely deployed and practised. Robust fixed bed technology uses standard industry multi-tubular reactors. 8
Population growth and GDP growth will drive increasing ethylene demand. ‘In the next 10 years, IHS estimates global ethylene demand will grow at approximately 4 percent a year, reaching nearly 196 MMT by 2023’ Source:http://press.ihs.com/press-release/country- industry-forecasting-media/trading-places-abundant- ethane-supplies-fuel-resurg Source: BP 2030 Outlook: 2012 9
What is driving bio-ethylene demand? Energy demand and Global warming According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), warming of the climate system is happening. Over the next 20 years, it’s predicted that global energy demand will increase by nearly 40%. Bio-ethylene product creates substantial environmental benefits Referencing the International Renewable Energy Agency’s (IRENA) paper; ‘bio-ethylene can reduce GHG emissions by up to 40% and save fossil energy by up to 60% compared to petrochemical ethylene’1 . Change in consumer attitudes Awareness of sustainability and global warming has affected consumer preferences creating a market for ‘green products’ where premiums of up to 30% for bio-MEG2 have been publically stated. 1. IEA-ETSAP and IRENA© Technology Brief I13 – January 2013 2. ICIS news; 09 May 2013 ; APIC '13: Greencol Taiwan Corp to keep 67% ops at bio-EG units 11
Non-bio factors are also shaping demand for bio-ethylene Ethylene cracker E2E Plant Ethylene Vinyl acetate Ethylene Oxide Ethyl benzene Ethylene Di- LAOs / det. Polyethylene monomer (MEG) (Styrene) Chloride alcohols (VAM) • 20 – 300 Kte Shanghai Ethylene Cracker Complex • Integration for derivative production • Ease of transportation of ethanol versus ethylene • Economies of scale • Speciality chemicals with niche demand • Capacity of a typical single-train steam cracker >1 million tpa • Situated on / near a chemicals or refinery complex 12
BP has developed a proprietary ethanol to ethylene (E2E) technology, now being demonstrated on a large, fully integrated pilot plant 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 First bioethanol First poly- Pilot plant tests completed ethylene Initial test sanctioned successfully Pilot plant High on pilot plant completed on (~$10m) produced optimised throughput Commissioned alcohol demonstration catalyst Hull pilot plant dehydration run screening 13
The ultra selective BP Ethanol to Ethylene Process: Hummingbird® technology BP proprietary technology Liquid Recycle CH3CH2OH Ethanol Reactor Separator Purification (bio / chemical/ Ethylene hydrous/ anhydrous) Hummingbird® is a next generation dehydration technology Facilitated by proprietary catalyst technology, the Hummingbird® technology’s milder operating regime gives superior conversion efficiency to existing technologies. 14
The Hummingbird® process benefits from ultra high selectivity at lower cost Hummingbird The Hummingbird® process has the 100 200-270 C, proprietary catalyst o following advantages: • Ultra selective catalyst gives >99.0% overall carbon conversion to Carbon selectivity (%) 98 polymer grade ethylene • Simplified product separation and purification 96 • Results in 5% lower opex and 25% lower capex when compared to first First generation technology generation technologies 315-460oC 94 Pressure 15
With a more energy efficient process Hummingbird® is leading the way in GHG savings for ethanol dehydration technology GWP from Process Energy Demands 0.5 0.4 Kg CO2e / Kg C2H4 0.3 Gas Electricity 0.2 Steam 0.1 0.0 Hummingbird® 1st Gen GWP – Global Warming Potential • ‘Bio’ ethylene production from sugar cane ethanol saves ~3.65 kgCO2e per kg bioethylene if compared with conventional ‘fossil’ ethylene • Carbon capture for Hummingbird® technology assessed as 2.2 kg/kg (‘credits minus debits’) • Independent of scope. Location: Brazil • Process energy – Hummingbird® technology does not require gas combustion 16
Philip M J Hill MEng CEng MIChemE Project Manager Conversion Technology Centre BP International Ltd Chertsey Road Sunbury-on-Thames Direct +44 203 401 2177 Middlesex TW16 7LN Mobile +44 7825 273243 United Kingdom philip.hill@uk.bp.com www.bp.com 17
You can also read