SUSTAINABLE CONVENTIONAL RESOURCE COMPANY TSX: SGY MARCH, 2020 - Surge Energy Inc.
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
REASONS TO OWN SURGE – TSX: SGY Value based with a strong focus on sustainable production from conventional reservoirs In response to the current volatility in global crude oil markets, Surge management and Board have reacted proactively, shifting previously budgeted capital from Q1 and Q2 2020 into Q4 of the year. Furthermore the Company has reduced its dividend until such time as there is a sustainable recovery in world crude oil pricing. ▪ Focus on high quality conventional, large OOIP (1), light/medium gravity crude oil reservoirs; ▪ Maintains a stable production base with 86% oil & NGL’s and a low corporate decline rate of 23%; ▪ Drilling inventory of over 800 net locations (>13 years of drilling) (2); and • >250 of which have an IRR >20%, at $40 WTI(2). ▪ Total Proved Net Asset Value(3) of $2.37 per basic share. (1) See the Reserves section of the Oil and Gas Advisories section at the back of this presentation. (2) See the Drilling Locations section of the Oil and Gas Advisories section at the back of this presentation. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK on ASslide ENDNOTES 2 (3) Net Asset Value calculation is detailed 5 – Net Asset Value.
SIGNIFICANT HEDGE POSITION (1) Robust 2020 hedging program provides balance sheet protection OIL HEDGES ▪ Well-positioned with 42% of net oil production hedged (i.e. 1.6 million barrels) at approximately CAD $80/bbl for Q1 through Q3 of 2020. ▪ Edmonton Light and WCS oil differentials protected with differential hedging strategy and operational flexibility. ▪ Attractive natural gas pricing hedged in 2020 through a combination of swaps and collars. Qtr. 1 2020 Qtr. 2 2020 Qtr. 3 2020 Qtr. 4 2020 Qtr.1 2021 Avg. bbls/d Hedged 7,250 5,500 5,000 1,500 500 Avg. Floor Price $ 81.02 $ 79.79 $ 78.68 $ 79.29 $ 74.29 Note: All USD-denominated WTI hedges have been converted to CAD at a rate of $0.70 USD/CAD in the above graph and table. (1) For further details on hedging pleas see the “Hedging Section” in the Appendix of this presentation. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 3
2019 HIGHLIGHTS Disciplined business strategy provided strong operational and financial results ▪ Average daily production increased by 17% in 2019 to 21,175 boepd, from 18,058 boepd in 2018; ▪ Increased operating netbacks(2) year over year by >27% to $27.66/boe; ▪ Maintained an all-in-payout ratio(2) of 91%; ▪ Reduced net debt(2) by $79 million over the year; ▪ Year end 2019 reserves provide a Total Proved Net Asset Value (3) of $2.37 per basic share; and ▪ Added 21.6MMboe of Total Proved + Probable reserves over the past 3 years, replacing 109 percent of production. (1) See the Oil and Gas Advisories section at the back of this presentation. (2) See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section at the back of this presentation. (3) Net Asset Value calculation is broken down in slide 5 – Net Asset Value. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 4
2019 YEAR END RESERVES >$1.6 Billion of Total Proved plus Probable Reserves Value (NPVBT10) 2019 Year End Reserves(1)(2) ▪ Increased Total Proved reserves per debt adjusted Oil & NGLs Gas Total NPVBT10 share by 4% in 2019; Reserve Category (3) (Mbbl) (MMcf)(4) (Mboe) ($MM)(5) Proved Producing 34,505 31,104 39,689 $603 ▪ Added 21.6 MMboe of Total Proved Non-Producing 253 217 289 $4 Proved + Probable reserves Proved Undeveloped 31,589 35,146 37,446 $416 over the last three years, Total Proved (1P) 66,346 66,467 77,424 $1,023 replacing 109% of production; and Probable 34,082 32,006 39,417 $621 Total Proved + Probable (2P) 100,428 98,474 116,841 $1,644 ▪ Maintained a 2P reserve life 2019 Reserves (MMboe) 2019 Reserves Value index of 15 years. (NPVBT10 $MM) (1) See the Reserves section of the Oil and Gas Advisories at the back of this presentation. (2) Amounts may not add due to rounding. (3) Includes light, medium, heavy and natural gas liquids. (4) Includes conventional FOOTNOTES INCLUDEDnatural IN THEgas, BACKsolution gas and coal bed methane. AS ENDNOTES 5 (5) Total ADR (Abandonment, Decommissioning, Reclamation) is included in the reserves report, as it is best practice stated in the COGE Handbook.
NET ASSET VALUE High quality conventional reservoirs continue to deliver value to shareholders 2019 NAV per Share PDP TP TPP Reserve Value NPV10 BT ($MM) $603 $1,023 $1,644 Undeveloped Land and Seismic ($MM) (1) $131 $131 $131 Net Debt ($MM) $(382) $(382) $(382) Total Net Assets ($MM) $352 $772 $1,393 Basic Shares Outstanding (MM) 326 326 326 Estimated NAV per Basic Share ($/share) $1.08/ sh. $2.37/ sh. $4.27/ sh. (1) Internally estimated and includes $95 million for non-reserve assigned lands and $36 million for seismic FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 6
2020 GUIDANCE AND KEY CORPORATE ATTRIBUTES Cost effective, sustainable, low decline, crude oil production base Key Operational and Financial Attributes Large Net OOIP: 2.5 Bbbl’s (5.6% cum to date recovery factor)(1)(2) High Netback, Oil Weighted Production (liquids weighting): 21,000 boepd (86% light/medium oil + NGL’s) Low Corporate Decline: 23% per year Large Drilling Inventory: 13 years (>800 net locations @ >60 wells per year) Net Asset Value (Sproule Dec 31/18): $2.37 per share TP; $4.27 per share P+P 2020e Exploration and Development Capital: $98.5 MM * Drilling and Completions $68.0 MM Facilities, Equipment, and Pipelines $23.5 MM Other (Land, Seismic, G&A) $ 7.0 MM Capital Efficiency ($ / boepd)(2): $20,400 Current Annual Dividend: $3.3 MM ($0.01 per share, per annum) 2020e Net Operating Expenses(3): $14.00-$14.50 per boe 2020e Transportation Costs: $1.50-$1.75 per boe 2020e General & Administrative Costs: $1.85-$1.95 per boe * In response to the current volatility in global crude oil markets, Surge management and Board have reacted quickly. The Compa ny has shifted previously budgeted capital from Q1 and Q2 2020 into Q4/20. (1) OOIP, drilling locations, and recovery factors are inclusive of Surge’s acquisition and divestiture activity to date in 2019. (2) See the Addition Metrics section of the Oil and Gas Advisories at the back of this presentation. (3) See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section at the back of this presentation. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 7
OPERATIONS FOCUSED IN 4 CORE AREAS Large OOIP pools in established conventional reservoir trends Greater Sawn: Total: ~5,000 boe/d (93% Oil & NGL’s) Average Area Production Total: 21,000 boe/d (86% Oil & NGL’s) Valhalla: Total: ~4,500 boe/d (65% Oil & NGL’s) Sparky: Total: ~9,000 boe/d (93% Oil & NGL’s) Shaunavon: Total: ~2,000 boe/d (100% Oil & NGL’s) Minors: Total: ~500 boe/d (50% Oil & NGL’s) FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 8
NET OOIP OF >2.5 BILLION BARRELS Large OOIP, with low recovery factors - focused in conventional reservoirs SGY Net CTD(2) Total Booked Net Total Net drilling Estimated Net Oil Independent Recovery Core Area Formations Locations Avg. WI OOIP Recovery Factor P+P (MMbbls) (Booked)(1) Factor (% OOIP) Sparky Formation + >500 Sparky Core >1,000 92% 8.2% 11.8% Mannville Group (185) Doig / Montney / >75 Valhalla >200 84% 4.6% 9.5% Charlie Lake (44) >150 Greater Sawn Slave Point >700 90% 5.0% 8.6% (84) Shaunavon >125 Shaunavon >400 100% 1.9% 4.7% (Upper & Lower) (92) (3) >800 TOTALS : >2,500 91% 5.6% 9.0% (428) >2.5 Billion barrels of net internally estimated OOIP under ownership; Current net recovery factor ~5.6%. (1) See the Drilling Locations in the Oil & Gas Advisories section at the back of the presentation. (2) CTD means cumulative oil produced to date and is effective to December 31, 2019. (3) Totals doINCLUDED FOOTNOTES not sum asIN minor THEproperties BACK AShave been included in the totals but have not been subcategorized in the table. ENDNOTES 9
TARGETING CONVENTIONAL OIL RESERVOIRS Surge focuses on high quality reservoirs at the conventional end of the permeability spectrum Recovery factors, internal rates of return (IRR)(1), decline rate, and profit to investment ratio (PIR)(1) improves as reservoir quality Ultimate Oil Recovery improves. PIR & IRR High Risk Low Risk High Decline CAPITAL / BUSINESS / OPERATIONAL RISK Low Decline Unconventional Conventional Reservoirs Reservoirs Extremely Tight Very Tight Tight Low Moderate High Slave Point Bakken Permian Valhalla Doig Shaunavon Montney Viking-Cardium Duvernay Resource Halo Sparky 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Source: Modified from US Department of Energy Study Permeability (mD) Average Surge Permeability (1) See the Addition Metrics section of the Oil and Gas Advisories at the back of this presentation. 10
SURGE’S ECONOMIC INVENTORY > 20% IRR 13 years of drilling @ US$60 WTI - Average Risked IRR: 96% & PIR10: 1.22 SGY Economic Locations > 20% Risked IRR 900 13 yrs 13 yrs * Risked weighted average 13 yrs 800 700 10 yrs SGY Economic Locations 600 Years of Drilling Inventory 500 *PIR10: 1.86 *IRR: 166% *PIR10: 0.87 *PIR10: 1.22 *PIR10: 1.67 *IRR: 143% *IRR: 66% *IRR: 96% 400 300 200 100 0 $50 WTI $60 WTI $70 WTI $80 WTI Realized EDMN $1.50C$60 AECO $1.50C$73 AECO $1.50C$87 AECO $1.50C$100 AECO Realized WCS (0.75 FX) C$45 (0.75 FX) C$59 (0.75 FX) C$72 (0.75 FX) C$85 FX $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 Gas $1.50 AECO $1.50 AECO $1.50 AECO $1.50 AECO >250 locations have >20% IRR at $40 WTI (> 4 years of drilling)(2) (1) Profit to Investment ratio, discounted at 10% (PIR10) equals 0.0, when NPV10 equals the original investment capital (i.e. 0.0 = breakeven). See the Additional Metrics section at the back of this presentation for additional information. (2) Drilling locations are comprised of both booked and un-booked locations and are net of Surge’s acquisition and divestiture activity to date in 2019. See the Drilling Locations section at the back of FOOTNOTES this presentationINCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES for more information. 11
SPARKY – A DOMINANT POSITION Applying modern technology to a prolific Western Canadian formation AB SK ▪ The Sparky is a large, well established, prolific oil producing formation in Western Canada. ▪ Surge holds a dominant land position in the medium / light gravity oil window, and is applying modern horizontal multi-stage fracturing technology. Key Sparky Value Drivers: • Shallow depth (700-900m). • Low cost drilling (D,C&E at $1.2MM per well). • Surge continues to improve costs and efficiencies with the implementation of pad drilling. • Low geological risk due to 3D seismic and thousands of vertical penetrations. • Focus on lighter oil gravity (23-31° API) = higher netbacks. • Proven waterflood potential (Wainwright pool at >35% recovery factor(1)). Medium / Light Gravity Oil Window Sparky Formation Facts(1) >20° API First Production May 1922 Original Oil in Place > 11 Bbbls Cum Production > 1 Bbbls Recovery Factor 20,000 Hz Wells / Multi-Stage Hz / Surge Multi-Stage Hz >650 / >200 / >120 (1) Data sourced from Canadian Discovery and GeoScout FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 12
2019 SPARKY DRILLING RESULTS Production results continue to outperform internal type curve expectations Wainwright Betty Lake Silver Macklin Lakeview Provost ▪ 24 horizontal Sparky wells drilled and on production in 2019: Sounding • Normalized average production is well above Surge’s internal type curve Lake Eyehill • 12 wells were brought on production in Q4 Eyehill Sounding ▪ Surge is realizing top tier capital efficiencies of 1.0 Bbbls Net OOIP down to $1.05 million per well as compared to a budgeted >500 Drilling Locations $1.25MM per well). (>10 year inventory, 90% Oil) Surge Operated Wells >9,000 boepd currently 2019 Sparky Drills (1) See the INCLUDED FOOTNOTES Addition Metrics IN THEsection BACK of AS the ENDNOTES Oil and Gas Advisories at the back of this presentation. 13
EYEHILL – A CASE STUDY Increased production and cashflow over 380% in 3 years YE 2015 Maintain Flat Production as per Divco Model Surge Eyehill: ▪ >200MMbbls net OOIP ▪ >65 net locations remain (45 net booked) Source: GeoScout • Surge had only 15 horizontal wells producing 500 boepd (80% oil) at year end 2015. • Surge has drilled an average of 14 wells per year (12 per year excluding acquisitions), increasing R3W4 production by 400% – inclusive of lost production associated with water injector conversions. • Of the 72 operated horizontal wells at Eyehill, Surge drilled 60 and acquired 12. • To date 9 of the 72 wells drilled have been converted to water injection, providing pressure support and • Peak production of 2,950 boepd was reached in May 2017. lowering the pool decline (i.e. Divco model). TPP TPP Net OOIP # of producing # of Hz Wtr Production CF/Yr @ % Oil Reserves NPV10 (MMbbl) Hz's Injectors (boepd) US$60 WTI (Mboe) ($MM) YE 2015 70 15 1 500 80% $7.0 4,089 $49 YE 2019 200 59 9 2,500 83% $33.7 15,029 $231 4 Yr Change +130 +44 +8 +2,000 +3% $26.7 +10,940 $182 14 +186% FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES +293% +400% +381% +268% +371%
GREATER SAWN - CONCENTRATED LIGHT OIL >600MMbbls net OOIP in concentrated Slave Point reservoirs Sawn ▪ OOIP of >700 MMbbls net of light oil OOIP: >200 MMbbl net (35-42° API). Red Earth ▪ Development inventory of 150 net locations OOIP: >250 MMbbl net (84 net booked). ▪ Key Slave Point Attributes: Evi / Otter • 6% recovery to date. OOIP: >150 MMbbl net • 18% base decline; waterflooded. • Production derived primarily from large multi-cycle reef complexes (pay(1) thickness of up to 18 meters). ▪ Active Slave Point Waterfloods: • Sawn • Red Earth Nipisi & Nipisi South • Evi/Otter OOIP: ~100 MMbbl net • Nipisi (1) ) See the Addition Metrics section of the Oil and Gas Advisories at the back of this presentation. 15
VALHALLA – STACKED MULTI-ZONE POTENTIAL Multiple large OOIP light oil reservoirs provide a sustainable drilling inventory and production base ▪ >200MMbbls of net combined OOIP. ▪ Doig wells continue to be among the most prolific oil producers in Western Canada. Montney ▪ Recently drilled a horizontal well into the Company’s large OOIP Montney (turbidite) light oil pool, with initial production rates exceeding 1,400 bopd. ▪ Drilling inventory includes >75 net locations in Charlie Lake multiple horizons (44 net booked). IP30: >200 bopd Doig ▪ Light oil gravity (~40° API) and extensive infrastructure in the area = attractive netbacks. Depth Net OOIP Capital IP180 IP 180 Prod Eff Formation (m) (MMbbl) ($MM/well) (boe/d) ($/boepd) Charlie Lk. 1900 >40 $3.0 270 $11,100 Doig 2050 >150 $4.0 450 $8,900 Montney 2200 >40 $4.0 370 $10,800 FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 16
SHAUNAVON >400 MMbbl net OOIP on Surge lands in the Upper and Lower Shaunavon ▪ Shaunavon produces 100% high netback, low decline oil. ▪ Upper Shaunavon net OOIP is estimated to be >200MMbbl. • >65 net locations – (35 net booked). • 10 horizontal wells converted to water injection. • Current recovery in the Upper Shaunavon is ~1%. ▪ Lower Shaunavon net OOIP is estimated to be >200MMbbl. • >70 net locations – (57 net booked). • Surge recently drilled and completed 6 Lower Shaunavon wells using cemented liner, plug and perf methodology with 100% success rate. • Current recovery in the Lower Shaunavon is ~3%. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 17
CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY Surge is taking a proactive approach to Environmental, Social, and Governance issues Environmental Social Governance ▪ Surge abandoned 149 ▪ Surge employs a pro- ▪ Surge is committed to wells in 2019 which is active safety culture and diversity in the workplace over 4X the number of is proud to be over 4 and on its Board of wells Surge drilled. years without a lost-time Directors. incident. ▪ Surge increased the gender diversity on the Board of ▪ Surge has joined the Directors to 33% from 22% in Alberta Energy ▪ Surge is proud to be a 2019. Regulators Area Based Gold Level sponsor of the ▪ Surge’s Board independence increased to 78% from 71% in Closure Program, La Glace regional 2019. allowing Surge to focus recreation centre – ▪ The average age of Surge on abandoning and providing a new Board members is currently 59 reclaiming entire areas community centre and ice years. versus single wells, rink to the town of La greatly increasing the Glace, Alberta. capital efficiencies of these projects. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 18
APPENDIX FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 19
OIL HEDGING Qtr. 1 2020 Qtr. 2 2020 Qtr. 3 2020 Qtr. 4 2020 Qtr.1 2021 Avg. bbls./d Hedged 7,250 5,500 5,000 1,500 500 Avg. Floor Price(1)(2) $ 81.02 $ 79.79 $ 78.68 $ 79.29 $ 74.29 (1) All USD-denominated WTI hedges have been converted to CAD at a rate of $0.70 USD/CAD in the above table and graph. (2) WTI 3-way hedges consist of a sold put, a bought put and a sold call. Using Q1 2021 as an example ($44/$52/$60), Surge receives FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE 20 WTI+$8/bbl when WTIBACK is at AS ENDNOTES or below $44/bbl; Surge receives $52/bbl when WTI is between $44/bbl and $52/bbl; Surge receives WTI when WTI is between $52/bbl and $60/bbl; and Surge receives $60/bbl when WTI is above $60/bbl.
RISK MANAGEMENT / HEDGING STRATEGY The Company has an on-going, risk management / hedging program. Below is a list of Surge’s current WTI hedges: WTI Hedges - Swaps Quarter Volume Swap (USD) Qtr. 1 2020 3,250 $ 58.17 Qtr. 2 2020 1,500 $ 57.03 Qtr. 3 2020 500 $ 57.25 WTI Hedges - Collars Quarter Volume Bought Put (USD) Sold Call (USD) Qtr. 1 2020 4,000 $ 55.53 $ 65.74 Qtr. 2 2020 4,000 $ 55.41 $ 65.34 WTI Hedges – 3 Ways Quarter Volume Bought Put (USD) Sold Call (USD) Sold Put (USD) Qtr. 1 2020 - $- $- $- Qtr. 2 2020 - $- $- $- Qtr. 3 2020 4,500 $ 54.83 $ 64.98 $ 46.61 Qtr. 4 2020 1,500 $ 55.50 $ 66.00 $ 46.83 Qtr. 1 2021 500 $ 52.00 $ 60.00 $ 44.00 FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 21
RISK MANAGEMENT / HEDGING STRATEGY The Company has an on-going, risk management / hedging program. Below is a list of Surge’s current WTI hedges: WCS Oil Differential Hedges Natural Gas Hedges Floor Ceiling Type Term Volume Currency Floor Ceiling Type Term bbl/d Currency (per bbl) (per bbl) US$WTI less April – WCS Swap 1H 2020 1,000 USD - Chicago 3,000 $2.05 per $16.50 October USD - Swap MMBTU/d MMBTU 2020 Q2 – Q4 US$WTI less US$WTI less WCS Collar 1,500 USD Chicago Dec 2019 – 3,000 $3.08 per 2020 $15.50 $20.00 USD - Swap March 2020 MMBTU/d MMBTU US$WTI less US$WTI less WCS Collar 2020 1,000 USD AECO Nov 2019 – 3,000 $1.98 per $14.60 $19.95 CAD - Swap Dec 2020 GJ/d GJ Q2 – Q3 US$WTI less Chicago Nov 2019 – 3,000 $2.25 per $2.90 per WCS Swap 1,500 USD - USD 2020 $16.40 Collar Oct 2020 MMBTU/d MMBTU MMBTU US$WTI less AECO 4,000 $1.45 per WCS Swap 2H 2020 1,000 USD - Cal 2020 CAD - $17.50 Swap GJ/d GJ WCS Swap Q3 2020 500 USD US$WTI less - Chicago Nov 2020 – 3,000 $2.15 per $2.90 per $16.45 USD Collar Oct 2021 MMBTU/d MMBTU MMBTU MSW Oil Differential Hedges Floor Ceiling Type Term bbl/d Currency (per bbl) (per bbl) US$WTI less MSW Swap Q2 2020 1,500 USD - $5.75 Q2 – Q3 US$WTI less MSW Swap 3,500 USD - 2020 $4.94 FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 22
INTEREST RATE AND FX HEDGING & CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE INTEREST RATE HEDGE Notional Amount Surge Type Term Surge Pays Fixed Rate Surge Pays (CAN$) Receives Semi-Annual Step Up • Beginning at 1.786% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Swap Feb 2018 to Feb 2023 $100,000,000 Floating Rate Fixed Rate • Ending at 2.714% • Averaging 2.479% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Swap July 2019 – June 2024 $50,000,000 Floating Rate Fixed Rate 1.785% FIXING INTEREST COSTS IN A RISING RATE ENVIRONMENT Notional Amount Surge Surge Type Term Effective Fixed Rate Surge Pays (CAN$) Receives Pays Fixed-to-Floating Rate Swap Feb 2018 to Feb 2023 $100,000,000 Floating Rate Fixed Rate Effective All in Rate 4.76% (1) July 2019 – June Fixed-to-Floating Rate Swap $50,000,000 Floating Rate Fixed Rate Effective All in Rate 4.04% (1) 2024 Convertible Debenture Nov 2017 to Dec 2022 $44,500,000 Floating Rate Fixed Rate Effective All in Rate 5.75% Issuance Convertible Debenture May 2019 to June $34,500,000 Floating Rate Fixed Rate Effective All in Rate 6.75% Issuance 2024 Total $229,000,000 Weighted Average All in Rate of 5.09% FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE HEDGE Type Term Notional Amount (USD) Rate FX average Rate Fund Q2 2020 – Q4 2020 $1,000,000 per month Swap at $1.3245 (1) Based on projected borrowing spread as of December 31, 2019 FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 23
ANALYST COVERAGE Financial Institution Analyst Email Address Acumen Capital Partners Trevor Reynolds treynolds@acumencapital.com BMO Capital Markets Ray Kwan ray.kwan@bmo.com Canaccord Genuity Anthony Petrucci apetrucci@canaccordgenuity.com CIBC Dave Popowich dave.popowich@cibc.com Clarus Securities Inc. Robert Pare rpare@clarussecurities.com Cormark Securities Inc. Garett Ursu gursu@cormark.com Eight Capital Adam Gill agill@viiicapital.com GMP FirstEnergy Robert Fitzmartyn rjfitzmartyn@gmpfirstenergy.com Industrial Alliance Securities Michael Charlton mcharlton@iagto.ca Laurentian Bank Securities Todd Kepler KeplerT@lb-securities.ca National Bank Financial Dan Payne Dan.payne@nbc.ca Peters & Co. Limited Cindy Mah cmah@petersco.com Raymond James Jeremy McCrea Jeremy.McCrea@raymondjames.ca Schachter Asset Management Josef I. Schachter josef@e-sami.com Scotia Capital Inc. Cameron Bean cameron.bean@scotiacapital.com TD Securities Juan Jarrah Juan.Jarrah@tdsecurities.com 24
CORPORATE PARTNERS Advisors National Bank of Canada Bank of Nova Scotia Bank of Montreal ATB Financial Bankers Syndicate: Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Toronto-Dominion Bank HSBC Bank Canada BDC Capital Goldman Sachs Auditor: KPMG LLP Legal Counsel: McCarthy Tétrault Evaluation Engineers: Sproule Registrar & Transfer Agent: Computershare Canada Paul Colborne, President & CEO Investor Contacts: Jared Ducs, CFO 2100, 635 – 8th Ave. SW, Calgary Alberta T2P 3M3 T: 403.930.1010 F: 403.930.1011 www.surgeenergy.ca FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 25
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS More particularly, this presentation contains statements concerning: Management’s expectations and plans with respect to the development of its assets and the timing thereof; Surge’s assets and the characteristics thereof; Surge’s declared focus and primary goals; Surge’s annual exploration and development capital expenditure program and budget and its flexibility to make adjustments thereto; commodity prices and management’s ability to react to changes thereto; drilling inventory; Surge’s hedging strategy; maintenance of Surge’s decline rate; export pipelines; and Surge’s dividend policy and expectations for future dividends. The forward-looking statements are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by Surge, including expectations and assumptions the performance of existing wells and success obtained in drilling new wells; anticipated expenses, cash flow and capital expenditures; the application of regulatory and royalty regimes; prevailing commodity prices and economic conditions; development and completion activities; the performance of new wells; the successful implementation of waterflood programs; the availability of and performance of facilities and pipelines; the geological characteristics of Surge’s properties; the successful application of drilling, completion and seismic technology; the determination of decommissioning liabilities; prevailing weather conditions; exchange rates; licensing requirements; the impact of completed facilities on operating costs; the availability and costs of capital, labour and services; and the creditworthiness of industry partners. Although Surge believes that the expectations and assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements because Surge can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, risks associated with the condition of the global economy, including trade, public health and other geopolitical risks; risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general (e.g., operational risks in development, exploration and production; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production, costs and expenses, and health, safety and environmental risks); commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations and constraint in the availability of services, adverse weather or break-up conditions; uncertainties resulting from potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; and failure to obtain the continued support of the lenders under Surge’s bank line. Certain of these risks are set out in more detail in Surge’s MD&A dated March 9, 2020 and in Surge’s AIF for the period ended December 31, 2019, which have both been filed on SEDAR and can be accessed at www.sedar.com. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof and Surge undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward- looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required byapplicable securities laws. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 26
OIL AND GAS ADVISORIES The term “boe” means barrel of oil equivalent on the basis of 1 boe to 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas. Boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 1 boe for 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value. Boe/d and boepd means barrel of oil equivalent per day. Bbl means barrel of oil. NGLs means natural gas liquids. In this presentation: (i) mcf means thousand cubic feet; (ii) mcf/d means thousand cubic feet per day (iii) MMcf means million cubic feet; (iv) MMcf/d means million cubic feet per day; (v) bbls means barrels; (vi) Mbbls means thousand barrels; (vii) MMbbls means million barrels; (viii) bbls/d means barrels per day; (ix) bcf means billion cubic feet; (x) Mboe means thousand barrels of oil equivalent; (xi) MMboe means million barrels of oil equivalent and (xii) boe/d means barrels of oil equivalent per day. Reserves Reserves disclosed in this presentation are derived from a third party external evaluation done by Sproule using standard practices as prescribed in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluations Handbook and account for associated proved and/or probable reserves, as applicable. Reserves referenced in this presentation reflect the bookings that existed as of December 31, 2019 and do not account for Surge’s Acquisitions and Divestiture activity to date. For the purpose of this presentation, Original Oil in Place (“OOIP”) means Discovered Petroleum Initially In Place (“DPIIP”) as at December 31st, 2019. DPIIP is derived by Surge’s internal Qualified Reserve Evaluators (“QRE”) and prepared in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluations Handbook (“COGEH”). DPIIP, as defined in COGEH, is that quantity of petroleum that is estimated, as of a given date, to be contained in known accumulations prior to production. The recoverable portion of DPIIP includes production, reserves and Resources Other Than Reserves (ROTR). The OOIP/DPIIP and potential recovery rate estimates are as at December 31st, 2019 and are based on current recovery technologies and have been prepared by Surge’s internal QRE. There is significant uncertainty as to the ultimate recoverability and commercial viability of any of the resource associated with the OOIP/DPIIP estimates, and as such a recovery project cannot be defined for this volume of OOIP/DPIIP at this time. The estimated values of the future net reserves of the reserves disclosed in this presentation do not represent the market value of such reserves. The estimates of reserves and future net reserve for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves and future net reserve for all properties due to the effects of aggregation. Drilling Locations This presentation discloses drilling locations in two categories: (i) booked locations; and (ii) unbooked locations. Booked locations are proved locations and probable locations derived from a third party external evaluation done by Sproule using standard practices as prescribed in the COGEH and account for drilling locations that have associated proved and/or probable reserves, as applicable. Unbooked locations are internal estimates based on prospective acreage and assumptions as to the number of wells that can be drilled per section based on industry practice and internal review. Unbooked locations do not have attributed reserves or resources. Unbooked locations have been identified by Surge’s internal QREs as an estimation of our multi-year drilling activities based on evaluation of applicable geologic, seismic, engineering, production and reserves information. There is no certainty that the Company will drill all unbooked drilling locations and if drilled there is no certainty that such locations will result in additional oil and gas reserves, resources or production. The drilling locations on which the Company actually drills wells will ultimately depend upon the availability of capital, regulatory approvals, seasonal restrictions, oil and natural gas prices, costs, actual drilling results, additional reservoir information that is obtained and other factors. While certain of the unbooked drilling locations have been de-risked by drilling existing wells in relative close proximity to such unbooked drilling locations, the majority of other unbooked drilling locations are farther away from existing wells where management has less information about the characteristics of the reservoir and therefore there is more uncertainty whether wells will be drilled in such locations and if drilled there is more uncertainty that such wells will result in additional oil and gas reserves, resources or production. Assuming a Jan 1, 2020 reference date, the company will have over >800 gross (>800 net) drilling locations identified herein, of these >400 gross (>400 net) are unbooked locations. Of the 428 net booked locations identified herein 330 net are Proved locations and 98 net are Probable locations based on Sproule’s 2019YE reserves . Type curve economics referenced on “Surge’s Economic Inventory > 20% IRR” slide, were constructed using a representative, fac tual and balanced analog data set, as of August 31, 2019, and a reference date of Jan 1, 2020. All locations were risked appropriately, and EUR’s were measured against OOIP estimates to ensure a rea sonable recovery factor was being achieved based on the respective spacing assumption. Other assumptions, such as capital, operating expenses, wellhead offsets, land encumbrances, working interests an d NGL yields were all reviewed and accounted for on a well by well basis by Surge’s QRE’s. Over 95% of the locations used in the economic inventory slide were represented by type curves developed by Su rge’s QRE’s, the remaining locations were represented using Sproule’s 2018YE type curves. All type curves fully comply with Part 5.8 of the Companion Policy 51 – 101CP. Type Curve economics were run at US$50/bbl, US$60/bbl, US$70/bbl and US$80/bbl WTI, with differential assumptions of US$16/bbl WCS and US$5/bbl EDMN, and a 0.75 USD/CAD FX. Following the collapse of oil prices, Surge has subsequently tested their economic inventory at $40 WTI, and estimate over 25 0 locations still have an IRR > 20%. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 27
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES Certain secondary measures in this presentation are disclosed for the purpose of providing investors with additional insight as to how the Company evaluates the management of its capital and analyze business performance. Non-GAAP financial measures are used by management to analyze cash flow generated from the Company's principal business activities and it may be useful to investors on the same basis. Non-GAAP financial measures are not used to enhance the Company's reported financial performance or position. Non-GAAP financial measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. They are common in the reports of other companies but may differ by definition and application. All secondary measures in this document are defined below: Adjusted Funds Flow The Company adjusts cash flow from operating activities in calculating adjusted funds flow for changes in non-cash working capital, decommissioning expenditures, transaction and other costs, and cash settled stock-based compensation plans, particularly cash used to settle withholding obligations on stock-based compensation arrangements that are settled in shares. Management believes the timing of collection, payment or incurrence of these items involves a high degree of discretion and as such may not be useful for evaluating Surge’s cash flows. Changes in non-cash working capital are a result of the timing of cash flows related to accounts receivable and accounts payable, which management believes reduces comparability between periods. Management views decommissioning expenditures predominately as a discretionary allocation of capital, with flexibility to determine the size and timing of decommissioning programs to achieve greater capital efficiencies and as such, costs may vary between periods. Transaction and other costs represent expenditures associated with acquisitions, which management believes do not reflect the ongoing cash flows of the business, and as such reduces comparability. Subsequent to the third quarter of 2018, all of the Company’s stock-based compensation plans are equity classified as the Company has the intention of settling all awards with shares. Cash settled stock-based compensation currently represents the statutory tax withholdings required on stock-based compensation awards and is a discretionary allocation of capital. The Company has the option to either require the holder to sell shares earned in the stock-based compensation plan to satisfy tax withholdings, or the Company can issue less shares to the individual and remit a cash payment to satisfy tax withholding requirements. Each of these expenditures, due to their nature, are not considered principal business activities and vary between periods, which management believes reduces comparability. Adjusted funds flow per share is calculated using the same weighted average basic and diluted shares used in calculating income per share. The following table reconciles cash flow from operating activities to adjusted funds flow and adjusted funds flow per share for the three months and year ended December 31, 2019: Three Months Ended Years Ended ($000s except per share) Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Cash flow from operating activities $ 34,474 $ 26,770 $ 149,417 $ 121,907 Change in non-cash working capital 2,876 (25,464) 16,569 (24,338) Decommissioning expenditures 1,425 1,439 5,522 6,348 Cash settled transaction and other costs 106 3,504 1,480 5,288 Cash settled stock-based compensation - - - 4,447 Adjusted funds flow $ 38,881 $ 6,249 $ 172,988 $ 113,651 Per share – basic $ 0.12 $ 0.02 $ 0.55 $ 0.46 FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 28
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES CONT’D All-in Payout Ratio All-in payout ratio is calculated using the sum of total exploration and development capital, plus dividends paid, divided by cash flow from operating activities less payments on lease obligations. For the purpose of 2020e all-in payout ratio calculations, payments on lease obligations of $10.8 million is assumed. This non-GAAP measure is used by management to analyze allocated capital in comparison to the cash being generated by the principal business activities. This measure is provided to allow readers to quantify the amount of cash flow from operations that is being used to either: i) pay dividends; or ii) deployed into the Company's development and exploration program. A ratio of less than 100% indicates that a portion of the cash flow from operations is being retained by the Company and can be used to fund items such as asset abandonment, repayment of debt, fund acquisitions or the costs related thereto, withholding tax obligations on stock based compensation or other items. Net Debt There is no comparable measure in accordance with IFRS for net debt. Net debt is calculated as bank debt plus the liability component of the convertible debentures plus or minus working capital, however, excluding the fair value of financial contracts and other long term liabilities. This metric is used by management to analyze the level of debt in the Company including the impact of working capital, which varies with timing of settlement of these balances. ($000s) As at Dec 31, 2019 As at Dec 31, 2018 Bank debt $ (316,404) $ (408,593) Accounts receivable 41,486 21,084 Prepaid expenses and deposits 4,875 9,222 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (40,848) (42,350) Convertible debentures (68,699) (37,973) Dividends payable (2,719) (2,577) Total $ (382,309) $ (461,187) Net Operating Expenses Net operating expenses are determined by deducting processing and other revenue primarily generated by processing third party volumes at processing facilities where the Company has an ownership interest. It is common in the industry to earn third party processing revenue on facilities where the entity has a working interest in the infrastructure asset. Under IFRS this source of funds is required to be reported as revenue. However, the Company’s principal business is not that of a midstream entity whose activities are dedicated to earning processing and other infrastructure payments. Where the Company has excess capacity at one of its facilities, it will look to process third party volumes as a means to reduce the cost of operating/owning the facility. As such, third party processing revenue is netted against operating costs in the MD&A. Operating Netback Operating netback is a financial measure of petroleum and natural gas revenue and processing and other income net of royalties, operating expenses, transportation expenses and realized gain (loss on financial contracts). This financial measure is used to benchmark and compare performance of the Company’s assets between time periods, operating areas and competitors. Most often this is shown as a per barrel or per boe measurement. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 29
ADDITIONAL METRICS Additional Metrics This presentation contains additional metrics commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry. These terms have been calculated by Management and do not have a standardized meaning. Management uses these oil and gas metrics to further analyze the performance of the Company over time and to compare the results of the Company with others in the industry. Additional metrics used in this presentation are as follows: • Net Present Value (NPV) is the present value of cash inflows less present value of cash outflows. NPV10 assumes a discount rate of 10%. • Free cash flow from operating activities yield is calculated by taking cash flow from operating activities and subtracting exploration and development capital, dividends, and payments on lease obligations divided by common shares outstanding. • Production Replacement is calculated as the total organic reserves additions (i.e., excluding acquisitions and dispositions) divided by annual production (also excluding acquisitions and dispositions). • Capital efficiencies is calculated as total exploration and development expenditures during the period, divided by an initial production rate for a specified number of days (i.e., $98.5 MM / (21,000 BOEPD multiplied by 23% corporate decline). Management uses Capital efficiency to understand the amount of development and exploration capital expenditures are required to add an additional boe of production per day. • Internal rate of return (IRR) is the discount rate that makes the NPV of all cash flows from a given project equal to zero. • Profit to investment ratio (PIR) is calculated as the NPV from a project divided by the capital investment ascribed to that project. • Recovery factor is defined as the percentage of hydrocarbons currently recovered or potentially recoverable from a known accumulation of such hydrocarbons. • Pay, for the purpose of this presentation, is defined as hydrocarbons located in the subsurface as determined by Surge’s internal QRE. The overall interval in which pay sections occur is the gross pay; the smaller portions of the gross pay that meet local criteria for pay (such as minimum porosity, permeability and hydrocarbon saturation) are net pay. • References to initial production (IP) rates found in this press release are useful for determining the presence of hydrocarbons. There is no assurance as to the length of time that wells will produce at such rates, and consideration must be given to natural declines thereafter. As such, readers are cautioned when using these production rates to aggregate Surge’s production. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED IN THE BACK AS ENDNOTES 30
You can also read