STRATEGIC PLANNING OF EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT: QUALITY ASSURANCE OF HIGHER EDUCATION - Amich Alhumami, Ph.D - ristekdikti
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
STRATEGIC PLANNING OF EDUCATION
DEVELOPMENT: QUALITY ASSURANCE
OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Amich Alhumami, Ph.D
Director of Higher Education, Science and Technology, and Culture
Ministry of National Development Planning/National Planning Agency (BAPPENAS)
1
INTRODUCTION
2
Introduction
The needs of good quality of secondary and
higher education become very centralistic and
Globalization makes interaction
between natinon more intensive
decisive.
with support of science and
technology advantage Hence, Higher Education Institutions have
very important role to develop quality of
Human Resources and to improve nation’s
New paradigm in globalization era competitiveness.
is based on knowledge-based
economy & innovation-driven
economy
Higher Education Institutions can generate
excellent graduates with comprehensive
knowledge, technology mastery, and good
technical skills
Mastering technology Promoting efficient
with strong knowledge institutional affairs
basis
Law of Rep. Indonesia No.12/2012 – Higher Education
Article 5: Aims of Higher Education
Develop College students with good personal attitude, health,
college knowledgable, competent, creative, independent,
skilled, and cultured.
students’
potential
Generate
Research work is useful in advancing Promote 4 Aims of Graduates
public welfare and enrich the life of community Higher who mastery To promote nation’s competitiveness
nation. services Education science and
technology
Generate
Applying the value of humanities so it can be science and
beneficial to improve nation’s progress, technology
civilization’s progress and the welfare of from research
humanity. works
New Paradigm About Strategic Position of Higher
Education Institutions in Development
Functions and Roles of Universities in Law No.12 Year 2012 on Higher Education, Article 58:
(1) Student and community learning facilities;
(2) The educational platform of the future leaders of the nation;
(3) Science and Technology Development Center
(4) Center for policy review and moral strength to seek and discover the truth
(5) National civilization development center
Knowledge-driven economic growth places higher education
in a very important and strategic position
Agent of
cultural Agent of
Education Research transformat Social and
Agent Agent ion & Economic
science and Development
technology
The strategic role of higher education at the global, national and regional levels is expected to fill
the TRI DHARMA Higher Education: Education, Research, and Community Service
5
CURRENT CONDITION AND
CHALLANGES ON
DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER
EDUCATION
6
Quality and Competitiveness of Higher Education (1)
Accreditation Status of Higher Education Institution (HEI)
1.589 HEI 3.044 HEI
accredited not yet accredited
1.589 of
A 4,4%
70 HEI
4.633 HEI are
accredited
B 558 HEI
Accreditation Status of Study Programs
35,1%
19.8411 of 27.194 listed study program are accredited, neverthless
the rest of 7.353 are not yet accredited.
C 60,5%
961 HEI
accredited Not yet accredited
A 15,2%
B 54,6%
C 30,3%
Sumber:https://banpt.or.id/ - Diakses: 5 Mei 2018 3.008 10.831 6.002
Source: https://banpt.or.id/ - Accesed on Mei 5th 2018
7
Quality and Competitiveness of Higher Education (2)
Indonesia’s HEI in Top University Ranking Quality of HEI Lecturers
QS 2016 QS 2017 QS 2018 Private
HEI HEI
MoRA
World Asia World Asia World Asia
Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank Public
UI 292 79 292 67 277 54 HEI
ITB 359 122 359 86 331 65 Private
MoRTHE
UGM 391 137 391 105 391 85 HEI
IPB 701-750 201-250 701-750 191 701-750 147 Public
HEI
UNAIR 751-800 147 751-800 190 751-800 171
Source: https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings
Source: https://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id – Accesed on 22th February 2018
8
Disconnection of Higher Education
Job Provider
Low Capacity Company as user of research
Research Institution
Less Information
Licensed Penetration Tester
and other Training Provider
Less Incentive
Lower education level
HEI Cause of Disconnection Disconnected Actors
Description
Between HEI and Job Provider (user/beneficier of expertise)
Between HEI and company (user of research’s result)
Between HEI and Research Institution (provider of reseach)
Between inter-HEI itself and; Between HEI and training provider (horizontal disconnection in all
experts provider)
Between higher education and lower education level (school age) (vertical disconnection in all
experts provider)
Source: Putting Higher Education to Work, WB 2012
9
Current Accreditation Assessment System
Prioritizing the Limited time and
quantity of resources
lecturers and
students, as well
as learning
support Verification of
infrastructure Input-based all data and
Acreditation information is
Approach difficult to
conduct
Acreditation result Potential to
have not been create moral
able to reflect the hazard in
differences in the assessment
quality of HEI and acreditation
study programs process
• The instrument has • Only to pursue the
not been able to assessment
measure the quality process, but not
performance of HEI yet optimal in its
and the actual study utilization
programs
10Demand of Skilled Labor in Labor Force Market
Demand of skilled-labor has increase and the requirement of those skills always
changing over times, but those related sectors are not always can fulfil it...
Failing Demand (problems with
The development and changes
Labor Force Market supplier & supporting environment;
of requested skills
supply-driven vs. demand-driven)
Competencies
Needs of acceleration and expansion mismatch
of economic development by
establishing diverse centre Under-demand of
economic-growth graduates in some areas
Lack of information & opportunity
Need to take benefit from for graduates in needed labor
demographic bonus force market
Population of old age: job
Some job opportunities are need
opportunity & potency-shifting
higher skills & competency
(outsourcing)
Possibility to fall Lack of synergy
into ‘middle-income between regional, Lack of match between
Decline of development
trap’ national government, economic and human
productivity
and ministries resource planning
11PORTRAIT OF QUALITY
PERFORMANCE AND
RELEVANCES OF HIGHER
EDUCATION INSTITUTION AND
STUDY PROGRAM – C as e Study :
Result of IT B Tracer Study
12Case Study: ITB’s Tracer Study
– ITB Career Center
The level of
absorption of
graduates in the labor
market
The level of Suitability of work /
cooperation between business fields of
universities and The alumni with fields of
industry and the
business world
Parameter study
Suitability of
competencies or skills
others between those
formed by universities
and those needed
13Link & Match between the Work of Graduates and Their Study Program (1)
(ITB Tracer Study 2013-2017)
Link & Match between the Work of Graduates and Their Study Program
College Students’ Averagely, link & match between job of ITB’s ▪ According to study programs, the graduates of Clinical Pharmacy has the highest
Generation: match with the their jobs. The graduates of Science & Pharmaceutical Enginering
2013: 2006 graduates and their study program for the last five
following behind.
2014: 2007 years are up to 70% ▪ The graduates of Chemistry and Meteorology are increase in terms of their job-
2015: 2008
2016: 2009 matching. It might indicate that the graduates are work in more-related study
2017: 2010 background for the last three years.
▪ In contrary, the graduates of Oceanography and Astronomy are decrease in terms of
their job-matching.Link & Match between the Work of Graduates and Their Study Program (2)
(ITB Tracer Study 2013-2017)
100-80 % 79-60 % 59-40 %Business-Industry Evaluation toward ITB Graduates (2017)
Foreign
Shift-Work Time
Language
Grade
Level of Business-Industry Concern
Health Skills Certification Score: > 4.5 Score: 4 - 4.5
Graduates
Willingness to learn 4.72 Work-hard 4.48
Availability Job Experiences
Willingness to Ethics 4.65 Health 4.34
occupied Education-Skills
Trustworthy 4.65 Foreign Language 4.31
Insight Responsibility 4.63 Loyalty 4.31
Occupation
Adaptation 4.62 Knowledge applied 4.26
Computer skills 4.6 Insight 4.06
Dicipline Knowledge
Applied Motivation 4.6 Individual work 4.05
Dicipline 4.6 Leadership 4.05
Trustworthy Computer
Skills Iniciative 4.57 Score: 3.5 - 4
Emotional Quotient (EQ) 4.55 Grade 3.77
Hard-work Adaptation
Working Underpressure 4.54
Graduates availability 3.75
Communication 4.52
Responsibility Education-Skills 3.74
Communication Team-work 4.52 Work experiences 3.65
Emotional Skills Certification 3.55
Loyalty
Quotient (EQ)
Willingness to occupied 3.51
Leadership Ethics
Concern < 3.5
Motivation Iniciative
Shift-work time 3.14
Willingness to Work Individual Work Satisfication
Working Underpressure Team-work Occupation 2.78ITB Graduates Competency VS University Contribution (2017)
Knowledge of Study
Lifelong Learning Knowledge out of Study
Writing the Report General Knowledge
Presenting the Idea Internet Skills
Project Management / Program Computer Ability
Iniciative Critical Thinking Competencies of ITB Graduates
Contribution of ITB
Responsibility Research Skills
Leadership Learning
Working with people from
Communication
different culture & background
Loyality & Integrity Working Underpressure
Adaptation Time Management
Tolerance Independent Work
Analysis
Working with team
Negotiation Problem SolvingIMPROVEMENT AND QUALITY
ASSURANCE OF EDUCATION IN
PLANNING AND BUDGETING
18EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT AS A NATIONAL PRIORITY IN THE GOVERNMENT
WORK PLAN (RKP) 2017 & 2018: Integrated Planning
Provision of
Improving Access and Quality of Education: ECED, qualified
teachers and
Primary Education, Secondary Education, including lecturers and
Tertiary Education equitable
placement Improvemen
Increased
t and Quality
relevance of
Assurance of
education
Education
Increasing the
capacity of
science and Development
Almost all Priority technology, of quality
innovation and learning
Programs in national competitiveness
Improved
of higher educ.
priorities Education Access, Quality,
Relevance and
reflects efforts to Competitiveness
of Education
encourage the Increased
Strengthening
religious
improvement of the institutions of
higher
education and
character
quality of education education
education
Increased Provision of
availability of
effective
quality facilities
and
educational
infrastructure assistance
Slide - 19Priority Activities in the Provision of Quality Teachers & Lecturers and
Quality Learning Development Programs
Revitalization
of Indonesian Reliable
Institute of curriculum
Teacher’s
Education
Increasing
Improving the
academic professionali
capacity of Provision of sm of
lecturers qualified teachers and
teachers and lecturers Development
lecturers and of quality
equitable learning
placement
Professional Comprehensi
ve and
and
credible
Distribution competent assessment
Improving teacher
and system
the welfare
equalization
of teachers
of teachers
and lecturers
and lecturers
20Targets and direction of development policies for higher education
in the 2018 Government Work Plan
ACHIEVEM TARGETS SASARAN
TARGETS ENT IN 2019
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TARGETS 2017 (RPJMN
2018
(achieved) Final
PRIORITY OBJECTIVES OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT - HIGHER EDUCATION Target)
a. College study programs are at 50,4% 55,9% 58,8% 61,8% 64,8% 68,4% FIELD DEVELOPMENT GOALS – HIGHER EDUCATION
least accredited B (2013)
a. Gross Enrollment Rate of Higher 33,37% 34,84% 36,73%
b. Higher education gross 0,07 0,08 0,16 0,18 0,22 0,24 Education
enrollment ratio between 20% of (2012)
b. The percentage of lecturers with 79,8% 83,8% 87,4%
the poorest population and 20%
minimum education qualifications (at
of the richest population
least Master Degree)
c. Increased graduates of vocational education and training who have certification
c. Number of scientific publications in 13.687 15.740 18.101
competence
reputable international journals
d. Increased environmental integrity from basic education to higher education (not
cheating, free from buying and selling diplomas, fake certificates, plagiarism) POLICY DIRECTION OF FIELD DEVELOPMENT
e. Availability of curriculum and learning processes that are in line with needs
Higher Education
POLICY DIRECTION OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY 1. Improve the quality of learning, among others, through strengthening
quality assurance, developing curriculum that provides 21st century skills,
Higher Education implementing an effective and efficient national curriculum, and
1. Increasing the distribution of quality higher education services, and strengthening a credible and comprehensive education assessment system;
increasing the relevance and competitiveness of higher education 2. Increase equitable access, quality and relevance of higher education;
2. Increasing the capacity of higher education as a center of science and 3. Increasing the competitiveness of higher education by encouraging the
technology, as well as a center for developing innovation in promoting capacity building of universities as a center of science and technology, as
well as driving the application of technological innovations in various fields
development of development
21Example 1: Institutional Development Activities for Higher Education, Directorate
General of Institution of Science & Technology and Higher Education, in the 2018
Budget Allocation
No. Output, ex. Component/ Sub-Component The 2018 Budget Allocation
1. Colleges that are a. Strengthening World Class Universities: Total Rp 2,34 billion
built into the • Workshop on World University Ranking • Rp 206,57 million
World Top 500 • Participation in international conference university ranking • Rp 452,16 million
• Socialization of WCU in Kopertis • Rp 33,89 million
• Coordination and administration activities • Rp 1,24 billion
• Monitoring and evaluation of activity performance • Rp 405,82 million
2. Higher education Total Rp 130,1 billion
institutions that a. Increased university accreditation • Rp 3,2 billion
improve their b. Institutional quality development • Rp 4,8 billion
quality c. Increased institutional cooperation between universities (domestically • Rp 5,0 billion
and abroad)
d. Providing assistance for public and private higher education • Rp 100,1 billion
e. Higher education institutions that receive institutional assistance / • Rp 15,97 billion
centers for excellence in higher education
f. Publication and promotion of universities • Rp 1,0 billion
3. Accredited Total Rp 130,0 billion
institutions / a. Accreditation of higher education institution • Rp 24,7 billion
study programs b. Accreditation of study programs • Rp 68,1 billion
(BAN-PT) c. Development and cooperation → coordination, meeting, etc • Rp 37,2 billion
22Example 2: Activities to Improve Learning Quality, Directorate General
of Learning & Student Affairs in the 2018 Budget Allocation
No. Output, ex. Component/ Sub-Component The 2018 Budget Allocation
1. Universities apply national standards of Total Rp 4,27 billion
higher education a. Facilitation of higher education implements SNDIKTI • Rp 1,07 billion
b. Preparation of plans, guidelines and instruments --> • Rp 326,3 million
Coordination and preparation - special education and
vocational education
c. Workshop / dissemination / seminar / training on the • Rp 2,4 billion
implementation of SNDIKTI in academic fields --> Training
related to academic / special education / vocational
education innovation
d. Program evaluation --> Preparation of reports - learning of • Rp 439 million
special education and vocational education
2. Lecturers attend training on learning a. Workshop / dissemination / seminar / training Total Rp 2,15 billion
oriented Indonesian national
qualification framework (KKNI)
3. Indonesian Institute of Teacher’s Total Rp 31,2 billion
Education apply national standards of a. Development of academic Lesson Study (LS) • Rp 2,4 billion
higher education (SNDIKTI) and national b. Capacity building and quality of LPTK learning • Rp 25,2 billion
standards for teacher education (SNPG) c. Restructuring the education system --> Development of • Rp 3,6 billion
innovative learning, Development of creative learning,
Socialization of Teacher Education Standards 23RPJMN 2015-2019: POLICY
DIRECTION OF EDUCATION
DEVELOPMENT
24RPJMN 2015-2019: HIGHER EDUCATION
1 ACCESS
Expansion and equity
2 QUALITY
In the RPJMN 2015-2019
Academic Achievement according to scientific
(Education Sector), it is
fields developed
emphasized that the
development of higher education 3 RELEVANCE
is oriented towards efforts to Compliance with the development needs:
improve four essential things industry and labor market
4 COMPETITIVENESS
Capacity to compete reflected in institutional
and individual performance - (lecturers,
researchers and graduates)
25Policy Direction and Strategies for Increasing Access, Quality,
Relevance, and Competitiveness of Higher Education
in the RPJMN 2015-2019 (1)
Increased Equitable Access to Higher Education
1 2
Increased effectiveness of
Increasing the capacity of universities affirmative policy -
according to the increasing number of
secondary school graduates e.g. Bidik Misi Scholarship and ADIK
Scholarship
3 4
Provision of scholarships, especially Provision of operational costs to
for the poor and the provision of improve the effectiveness of higher
quality long distance higher education education
26Policy Direction and Strategies for Increasing Access, Quality,
Relevance, and Competitiveness of Higher Education
in the RPJMN 2015-2019 (2)
Quality Improvement in Higher Education
1 2 3 Increasing the number and
Improving the quality of Increasing research budget strengthening of BAN PT
lecturers and researchers and designing incentive assessors; LAM formation for
professional study programs;
through Master and Doctoral systems to support innovative
and LPUK for testing the
Degree programs research activities
competence of higher education
graduates
4 5 Enforcement of regulations
6
related to quality assurance in Increased distribution of the
the administration of tertiary quality of inter-regional
Quality assurance for the education institutions →
tertiary institutions through
implementation of educational through increasing the
accelerating the accreditation
programs through LPTK reform effectiveness of the process of
of higher education programs
accreditation of higher
education institutions and study outside Java
programs
27Policy Direction and Strategies for Increasing Access, Quality,
Relevance, and Competitiveness of Higher Education
in the RPJMN 2015-2019 (3)
Increasing Relevance of Higher Education
1 Development of innovative
2 3
majors according to
development & industry needs, Strengthening the cooperation
Increased skills of certified
accompanied by improvement between higher education and
college graduates to shorten
of graduate competencies industry for research and
the waiting period for work
based on fields of study that development activities
are in line with the needs of
the labor market
4 5 6
Assessment of proposals for
Development of
opening new study programs in
Protection of study programs entrepreneurship education
public and private higher
with disciplines that are rarely and training integrated in
education more selectively,
interested courses, by establishing
according to the needs of the
cooperation with industry
labor market
28Policy Direction and Strategies for Increasing Access, Quality,
Relevance, and Competitiveness of Higher Education
in the RPJMN 2015-2019 (4)
Increased Equity in Higher Education Competitiveness
1 2
Facilitation of tertiary education Strengthening of higher education
institutions by building centers of
institutions becomes
excellence in certain fields of study
autonomous university (PTN-BH)
as embodiments of mission
in order to strengthen institutions differentiation, based on institutional
and improve governance capacity
3 4
Reviewing the budgeting Develop innovative funding
approach so that universities are schemes by developing three-
more dynamic and creative in party partnerships:
developing academic and government, universities and
scientific research programs industry
29REORIENTATION QUALITY
ASSURANCE OF HIGHER
EDUCATION
30Quality Assurance of Higher Education
“... maintain and improve the quality of higher education in continuous (continuous improvement),
which is run by universities internally”
The Quality Assurance System includes the following :
Scholarships for Buildings, lecture halls,
Degree (S2, S3) and Provision of Fulfillment and laboratories, libraries, and
Non-degree scholarship utilization of other academic facilities
programs for university
lectures infrastructure
Organizing research
collaboration
programs, visiting
professors, student Efforts to encourage lecturer
exchanges, joint
laboratories, and productivity in international
others publications and participation
in international conferences
31Reorientation Strategy Focus on the quality of the process
(learning, research, community service)
and the impact of higher education,
Approaches for namely the quality of graduates of higher
assessment and education, scientific publications, and
accreditation
instruments must innovation products
be output /
outcome based
Input includes lecturers and
education personnel, students,
curriculum, infrastructure, and
funding support The input The university's internal efforts
remains Reorienta Building
internal and
to improve quality on an
important, but ongoing basis, as well as a form
also needs to tion external
of public accountability
see how the quality
quality is Strategy culture
Indicators in the
accreditation
assessment must
reflect the real
quality of higher
education
32THANK YOU
33You can also read
