Seafood Strategic Outlook - Spring 2016 - Fish as Food: Seafish
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Seafood Strategic Outlook Spring 2016 Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish Author: Dr Angus Garrett
This document combines data, opinions and conjecture and is a position paper at the time of press. It is important to bear in mind that evidence today might suggest trends that turn out to be very different in the longer-term.
Contents 1. Introduction and requirement ....................................................................................................... 2 2. UK seafood industry and protein consumption ............................................................... 3 2.1 Consumer landscape ................................................................................................................................... 4 UK consumer Consumer attitudes and factors driving purchasing behaviours 2.2 Protein and product landscape ............................................................................................................... 5 Key proteins Product landscape 2.3 Outlets ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 Retail Food service 2.4 Framing seafood consumption risks (definition and dimensions) ........................................... 10 2.5 Supporting consumption in the UK seafood and wider protein industry .............................. 12 3. Drivers and risk developments affecting seafood ..........................................................13 consumption – the long view 3.1 Food security ................................................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Climate change ............................................................................................................................................ 14 4. UK seafood consumption - recent and anticipated ..................................................... 15 developments, impacts and response 4.1 Consumers ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Protein .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 4.3 Products ........................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.4 Outlets ...............................................................................................................................................................19 4.5 Example impacts and response................................................................................................................ 21 5. UK seafood consumption – impacts and response ..................................................... 24 to longer term developments Bibliography .........................................................................................................................................................26 Appendices Appendix 1 – Locating fish as food in seafood risk landscape .......................................28 Appendix 2 – Consultees ............................................................................................................................29 Appendix 3 – UK seafood industry .................................................................................................... 30 – main systems, functions and activities 1
Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish 1. Introduction and requirement This report is focussed on the UK consumption This report aims to support the UK seafood of seafood products. It considers the major industry in understanding: industry impacts arising from key drivers of UK consumption and sets out major areas where • The major characteristics of UK seafood industry and Seafish response may be required. consumption. The Seafish mission is to secure a profitable, • The new and emerging developments sustainable, and socially responsible future for expected to impact on this consumption. the UK seafood industry. An important underlying • Industry impacts (positive and negative) likely function for Seafish in achieving this mission is to to arise from these developments. help protect the industry in the face of consumer and market-related risks and challenges. • Action industry (and Seafish) can take in response. Risk developments in the macro trade landscape can present longer-term, strategic challenges This exercise, conducted in 2015, involved desk for the industry (see Appendix 1). Reflecting on research and consultation with Seafish staff and these developments in 2015, the Seafish Board industry operators (see Appendix 2). decided “Where is seafood consumption heading, and what can be done to ensure stability - or The review has limitations. The scope of even growth - in demand? How can seafood consultation is not exhaustive. In addition, the survive the pressure from other proteins?” This review does not consider alternative future review is an important part of responding to this pathways (scenarios), but is based on ‘business need. as usual’ projections. 2
2. UK seafood industry and landed/farmed in the UK; UK processors of fish; and the downstream supply chain in the protein consumption UK of all of the former including food service companies, retailers and exporters. This chapter provides a representation of the seafood industry landscape and the major UK • An international system – defined as a system product categories. This representation frames reliant on internationally sourced material the investigation, discussion and agreement on (material caught from stocks in the North risk developments, impacts and responses. Atlantic and elsewhere landed outside the UK, material farmed outside the UK). Within the The UK seafood industry, being reliant on wild ‘international system’, the key UK actors are: capture and aquaculture produced raw material, agents and merchants in the UK importing is diverse, complex and dynamic. The seafood fish and shellfish that is caught, landed or industry is considered here to operate as many farmed and possibly processed outside of the subsystems (regional, sectoral), of varying UK; UK processors of imported fish; and the degrees of interdependence, nested within one downstream supply chain in the UK of all of overarching global system. the former including food service companies, retailers and re-exporters. In the global context, from a UK perspective, there are at least two major seafood systems It is notable that from a UK perspective, imported that, although overlapping, have distinct seafood material is largely for UK consumption, characteristics: whilst material originating in the UK is generally exported for overseas consumption. The UK • A domestic system – defined as a system consumer maintains a robust preference for reliant on domestically sourced material salmonids (farmed salmon), whitefish (cod, (material caught from stocks in North haddock and Alaska pollock), pelagics (tunas) Atlantic/UK waters and landed in the UK, and shellfish (cold-water prawn and farmed material farmed in the UK). Within the warm-water prawn). Meanwhile, UK landings ‘domestic system’, the key UK actors are: volumes are dominated by mackerel and herring producers (farmers/vessels), agents and (pelagics), Nephrops (shellfish) and cod and merchants in the UK handling material haddock (whitefish). INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM - non-UK Fish as Food coverage INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM - UK-related Figure 2.1 Components of the UK international and domestic systems DOMESTIC SYSTEM and how they are interrelated (Fish as Food coverage highlighted) - UK-related 3
Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish 2.1 Consumer landscape Disposable income is a measure of households’ ability to increase spending without reducing 2.1.1 UK consumer savings or increasing borrowing. Any shortfall between average levels of disposable income In 2014, the population of the UK was estimated to and expenditure for the UK household illustrates be 64.5 million. Table 2.1 provides population age a ‘squeeze’ in household finances. bands and shows the ‘outer envelope’ in scoping the number of potential seafood consumers. Within these headline descriptions of the UK consumer, there are consumer groups based Around two thirds of the UK population are on life stage, age group, occupation group etc. working age. This amounts to around 41 million Specific consumer segments for seafood are people. Around 11 million have reached retirement identified in section 2.2.3. age. Table 2.1 Population summary Life stage Population group Age group Typical consumer groups 2014 % Non-working age 0-15 12,058,689 19% Striving 16-25 Limited budget 8,327,460 13% 26-30 Students/young professionals 4,336,002 7% Thriving Working age 31-40 Busy young families 8,282,437 13% 41-50 Older, more affluent, families 9,246,943 14% 51-64 Older families 10,722,318 17% Surviving Non-working age 65 plus Elderly people 11,131,805 17% TOTAL 64,596,800 100% (Source: ONS) Amongst the working age population, 78% were 2.1.2 Consumer attitudes and factors economically active (either in work, seeking or driving purchasing behaviours. available for work). The remaining 22% were inactive due to study, looking after family, Consumer attitudes, and more specifically the sickness/disability, not needing to work etc. factors driving their purchasing behaviours, are complex and interconnected. From a Seafish Average disposable income for all households in perspective, attitudes can be simplified and 2014 was £30,716. explored as ‘concentric circles of concern’ Average total household expenditure in 2014 was (noting that the boundaries are fluid and may £27,627. The five highest categories of spend were: vary significantly). See fig 2.2. • Transport (£3,890) • Housing (net), fuel and power (£3,780) • Recreation and culture (£3,578) • Food and non-alcoholic drink (£3,057) • Restaurants and hotels (£2,210) An average 11.1% of all UK household 2014 spend went on food (15.7% for lowest 20% of household income). Figure 2.2 Concentric circles of concern 4
At the centre of the circle is ‘Me and my family’: 2.2 Protein and product landscape where consumers’ primary concern is the health and welfare of themselves and their children. 2.2.1 Key proteins Only once this need is satisfied, do consumers begin to widen their ‘circle of concern’. Seafood sits within a broad protein landscape that contains a number of substitute proteins. Other people (and animals) are of next concern This landscape includes the following protein (mid-circle). This is where we move beyond ‘the categories: garden gate’ into beginning to be concerned about health and safety of other people, the way • Fish (whitefish, pelagic, shellfish, salmon, exotic animals are treated and issues of fair-trade begin fish) to play. • White meat (chicken, turkey, gamebirds etc) Finally, the outer circle is that of the environment • Red meat (pork, lamb, beef, veal, etc) – where once people are satisfied that all humankind is being fairly treated then consumers • Meat substitutes (mycoproteins e.g. Quorn etc, concerns move on to the environment (trees, plant based proteins e.g. grains, pulses, nuts, landscapes, oceans). seeds etc, and insect proteins) Across these circles, economic, social and With each protein category comes a distinct environmental factors influence consumer set of attributes that provide advantages and behaviours. At one end, economic factors play a disadvantages in the eyes of the consumer. These dominant influence in ‘Me and my family’, whilst can drive consumption levels, but also where further out social, and then environmental, factors products are consumed (in-home or out-of- have an important influence. Factors include: home). • Economic: • Price – fish is often relatively more expensive than other proteins. ◦◦ Price • Quality – fish can show greater variation than ◦◦ Quality (freshness, taste, etc) other proteins in freshness, taste etc. • Social: • Convenience – compared to other proteins, ◦◦ Convenience (time, versatility, norms etc) fish may offer a more limited product format and be less versatile (the UK consumer can be ◦◦ Nutrition ‘scared of seafood’). ◦◦ Welfare (people, animals) • Nutrition – fish has a number of health benefits relative to, say, red meat. • Environmental: • Environment – fish credentials (e.g. ◦◦ Resources sustainability and welfare) can be seen as more Consumer interest in food ranges from a complex/uncertain compared to land based functional concern (e.g. food as fuel), to seeking proteins. a convenience (e.g. quick meal/protein), or to a The relative quantities of fish and selected particular emotional and pleasurable experience white and red meats purchased for in-home (customised for titillation, “you deserve it” etc. consumption by UK households is shown in - a special occasion for example, or around fig 2.3. intrinsic attributes – what and where food comes from etc). 5
Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish Quantity of selected meat proteins purchased by UK households (in home) 1974 - 2013 (average per person per week) 345 295 Quantity (g) 245 195 145 95 2000 2006 2009 2008 2020 2007 2003-04 2005-06 2004-05 2002-03 2001-02 2010 1990 1980 2014 1994 2016 2019 1984 1996 1999 2018 1986 1989 1998 2015 2013 2012 1988 1974 1995 1993 2017 1992 1976 1979 1985 1997 1983 1982 1978 1987 1975 1977 2011 1991 1981 Beef (eaten in) Poultry (eaten in) Pork (eaten in) Fish (eaten in) Lamb (eaten in) Figure 2.3 Quantity of selected meat proteins for in-home consumption (Source: Defra) 2.2.2 Product landscape to support customised and kit/component solutions. At the other end of the spectrum, Within the protein landscape, products available products that involve significant transformation for direct consumption in the UK, serve specific of the original protein, can support off-the-shelf consumer interests. In serving these interests, solutions. proteins are processed to provide convenience (incl. time saving) for those storing/preparing/ Primary products are relatively simple in cooking the product (chefs or the consumer). comparison to the more sophisticated, Products offer a spectrum of solutions to the secondary and particularly tertiary, products. chef or consumer: Greater product variation can be expected with the latter and in minor/specialised primary • Customised solutions (meeting a special/ products. novel requirement e.g. special occasion) Primary processed material is in the main • Kit/component solutions (meeting a considered a fresh product (chilled never convenience requirement e.g. quick meal/ frozen, including live animal in the case of protein) fish). Secondary processed products are • Off-the-shelf solutions (meeting a general mainly frozen (including refreshed product) ‘food as fuel’ requirement e.g. meals) and ambient products (including prepared & preserved). Tertiary or composite products At one end of the spectrum, products provide (where protein is one of a number of ingredients basic proteins made available in a simple format, in the final product) could be fresh or frozen. 6
Table 2.2 Types of Seafood products Extent of processing Product Format None > Considerable Live Primary Secondary Tertiary Fresh Chilled never frozen x x x Refresh - chilled previously frozen x x Frozen Frozen x x Ambient Prepared and preseved x In general, seafood products destined for the UK to produce seafood products). Variation in market can be briefly characterised as: the level of control, ranging from vertically integrated chains to market based supply. • UK market products: A diverse set of products, ranging from sale of live fish to sophisticated • Major supplying regions: Origin and main added value products that match consumer producing countries being both UK and interests. international. • Species and chain: A diverse range of species, Table 2.3 shows some typical product examples with product supply chains ranging from short in fish, white and red meat. to long (reflecting species but also the time required to cook/consume versus time required Table 2.3 Example products in fish, white and red meat sectors Primary Secondary Tertiary Curry Whole Fishermen’s pie Crabsticks Loins Kedgeree Fish balls Fillets - skin on Salmon en croute Fish paste Fish Fillets - skinless Seafood cocktail Roe Portions - skinless Seafood pasta Taramasalata Meat in shell Szechuan prawns with vegetables Tuna pate Meat Spring rolls Prepared pre-school meals (
Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish Table 2.3 Example products in fish, white and red meat sectors (Cont.) Primary Secondary Tertiary Lamb curry Neck cutlets Lamb kheema Breast Lamb hot pot with potatoes Leg Irish stew Lamb Loin chops Donor kebabs Lancashire hot pot Mince Shish kebab Meat samosas Neck fillet Moussaka Shoulder Spring rolls Stewing lamb Prepared pre-school meals (
2.3 Outlets Convenience outlets tend to offer a more limited range of convenience products. These include Consumers are exposed to products through the likes of Lidl, Aldi and Iceland and the metro a wide range of outlets. Outlets can support outlets of the major multiple retailers. general mainstream consumption, offer convenience or serve specialised interests. Outlets that serve specialist interests include Outlets can be broadly categorised as retail fishmongers, delicatessens and fish counters (in-home consumption) and food service (out- within multiple retailers. Ethnic supermarkets, like of-home consumption). Food service can be Wing Yip and Seewoo, also serve niche interests. considered the avant-garde of the retail sector, developing product innovations (providing 2.3.2 Food service seafood solutions for unsure consumers and generating awareness of novel products) that Within food service outlets that support general are then diffused into more general mainstream mainstream consumption (meals) cover the food service and retail outlets. See figure 2.4 non-profit sector and the profit sector. Non- and table 2.5. profit outlets include schools, colleges, hospitals, prisons, etc. For profit outlets include hotel 2.3.1 Retail restaurants, bistros, gastro pubs etc. Within retail, outlets that support general Convenience outlets tend to offer a more limited mainstream consumption include the major range of convenience meals and snacks. These multiples. These include M&S, Waitrose, Tesco, include the likes of ‘fast casual’ and ‘quick Sainsbury, Asda, Morrison’s and Co-op (with service’ outlets. Aldi and Lidl now growing their mainstream Food service outlets that serve specialist market share). interests include ethnic and other specialist restaurants. Protein Outlets Consumer interest Fish Whitefish, Mainstream Product solution pelegic, Food service: Schools, shellfish, colleges, etc. hotels, General exotics, restaurants salmon Off-the-shelf • Time poor, cash rich/poor Retail: Multiple retailers • Prepared meals • Meal requirement White • Prepared products meat Chicken Convenience etc. Food service: Fast, Convenient casual, quick service Kit/component • Time poor, cash rich/poor Red Retail: Metro outlets • Prepared products • Quick meal/protien meat convenience stores requirement • Primary products Pork, lamb, beef Specialist Customised Particular Food service: Ethnic and • Bespoke meals • Time rich, cash rich Meat specialist restaurants • Primary products • Occasional requirement subs. Retail: Ethnic supermarkets, fishmongers etc. Figure 2.4 Current UK seafood and protein landscape from consumers to products and outlets. 9
Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish Table 2.5 Key Characteristics of whitefish, pelagic, shellfish and exotic fish Major supplying regions Species and chain UK market products Cod, haddock, whiting, monkfish, Whitefish products for the UK sole, plaice, hake, Alaska Pollock. UK domestic sources include UK market include domestic sourced Whitefish UK domestic more fragmented than waters and NE Atlantic. International fresh product (lower volume integrated chains of competitors e.g. sources include Arctic/Barents Sea and higher value (£/kg)) and Iceland. Fresh product sent direct (Norway, Russia, Iceland) and North internationally sourced refreshed/ by truck. Frozen product held in Pacific/Bering Sea (USA). frozen product (higher volume and storage, containerised and shipped lower value (£/kg)). and sent by truck. Herring, mackerel, sardine/pilchard, Pelagic products for the UK market anchovy, tunas. UK fresh product UK domestic sources include include fresh product (lower volume sent direct by truck, overseas fresh UK waters and NE Atlantic. and higher value (£/kg)) that is Pelagic material sent by truck and air freight. International sources include Eastern either domestically sourced or Frozen product held in storage, Atlantic ocean (Spain, Morocco), internationally sourced and frozen containerised and shipped and Indian ocean, Pacific ocean, and product (higher volume and lower sent by truck. UK domestic more Atlantic ocean. value (£/kg)) that is internationally fragmented than integrated chains sourced. of Iceland and Faroes. Shellfish products for the UK market Nephrops, cold water prawn, farmed include fresh but a sizeable volume UK domestic sources include UK warm water prawn. UK fresh of frozen product is also represented Shellfish waters and NE Atlantic. International product sent direct by truck. Frozen from UK and international sources. sources include North Atlantic, and product held in storage, and sent Fresh domestic product tends to be farmed sources in South East Asia by truck with international material high value low volume, and frozen and Central America. containerised and shipped. product tend to be low volume and high value (£/kg). Exotic seafood products for the UK market include fresh (including live) UK domestic sources include UK Carp, wild and farmed bass, farmed Exotic product, and frozen product. Both waters. International sources include bream, snappers, kingfish, parrotfish, fresh and frozen product tend to be EU, Asia, Australia, and Africa. and groupers. low volume and range from low to high value (£/kg). 2.4 Framing seafood consumption risks Risks to UK seafood consumption are summarised in table 2.6. Specific risks vary by consumer group, product type, as well as outlets. Examples are provided to illustrate how these risks impact on the industry - particularly in price, quality, and convenience as these risk areas are elevated in current conditions. 10
Table 2.6 Dimensions and risk to seafood consumption Areas of specific Dimension Example areas of specific risk risk Price range Polarisation of product value – premium versus value Expectation that fish price should fall / or be at a low price Price ceiling (max) Fish can be expensive relative to substitutes as disposable income Price decreases Price floor (min) The availability of volume supply – top 5/salmon/alternative species/etc Price of edible Level of waste involved in storing/preparing/cooking fish products protein Changes in ethnic mix and the influences on fish as a protein and particular Taste species within that. Freshness Capability of freezing technology to support this Level of consumer trust : chefs ‘versus’ brands ‘versus’ consumer Quality (themselves or trusted advocates e.g. bloggers) Brand loyalty falling with a more promiscuous consumer Consistency Enhanced by trusted brands, trusted outlets and online purchasing Capability of a consolidated -v- fragmented industry Presence and presentation of fish on online retail platforms Heightened awareness with rise of digital marketing, real-time campaigns Awareness constrained by fragmented industry/promotion Priorities of influential outlets Focus of outlets (e.g. discounters/number of metros) constraining shop Availibility window Specialisation (e.g. focus on chilled OR frozen) undermines diversity message Range and exposure of fish on offer resulting from store layout/formats & fragmented internal operations e.g. presence of fish counters Packaging Fish sitting alongside/given lower billing versus other proteins (e.g. Deli’s/ Number of fish dishes on menu’s/in restaurants) Convenience Fish a more difficult protein to choose (chilled/fresh requires ‘eyeballing’) Format matching to suit evolving eating habits (consumers grazing/ on the go snacking/household size - older people ‘eating for one’) Product Format Range of product formats (fresh, frozen, ambient) and requirement for pre- processed Format matching the deskilling of kitchen staff (reduced whole fish/ increased portions) Protein versatility Versatility/ preperation Norms/traditions versus experimentation (younger people, more adventurous) Variety driven by time/experience seeking Time Competing demands on consumers’ time Purchase frequency/footfall/traffic 11
Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish Table 2.6 Dimensions and risk to seafood consumption (Cont.) Areas of specific Dimension Example areas of specific risk risk Safety Health, fraud and mislabelling concerns e.g. Horse meat scandal Promotional focus on emotion/experience at expense of function & vice- Health awareness Health versa Polarisation of role – ‘functional’ versus ‘experience’ Nutritional content Health credentials People Slavery, bonded labour concerns, fair trade etc Welfare Animals Welfare of fish and others in food chain e.g. seals Resources Oceans More environmental factors now required (market access requirement) 2.5 Supporting consumption in Policy: Regulation, Government, NGOs the UK seafood and the wider • Global protein industry ◦◦ UN FAO – The Livestock, Environment & At present there are various levels of initiative Development initiative (LEAD) by industry, policy, and research stakeholders supporting responsible protein consumption and ◦◦ UN FAO/UNEP – Sustainable Food Systems production. Examples are listed below. Programme (SFSP) Industry: ◦◦ Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef • General protein awareness, generic marketing, • UK and data ◦◦ Eating Better campaign (encouraging ◦◦ Fish (Seafish) – Fish is the dish, Seafood dietary shifts towards less and better meat week, F&C shop of the year consumption) ◦◦ Pork, Lamb, Beef (Agriculture and ◦◦ World Wildlife Fund Livewell Plate Horticulture Development Board (AHDB)) ◦◦ Celebrity and celebrity chef campaigns • Specific seafood promotions (often species – including Paul McCartney’s Meat Free specific) by regional sources of supply Monday campaign, Hugh Fearnley- Whittingstall (sustainable diets) and Jamie ◦◦ Norwegian Seafood Council (cod, haddock, Oliver (healthier school meals). etc) Research: ◦◦ Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute (Salmon, Alaska Pollock, etc) Specialist research centres with an interest in food and seafood consumption include: ◦◦ Seafood Scotland (cod, haddock, mackerel, Stirling University (consumers and marketing), herring, Nephrops, etc) Bournemouth University (consumers), Aberdeen University (health and nutrition), and Oxford • Specific seafood product promotions University (Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food and Food Climate Research ◦◦ Individual brand owner campaigns Network). ◦◦ Multiple retailer campaigns ◦◦ Scottish salmon, Scottish shellfish, etc. 12
3. Drivers and risk 3.1 Food security developments affecting The main aspects of food security are: a seafood consumption globalised economy; global population increase; and global availability of raw material. Projected – the long view economic growth, growth in population (and middle class income), and changing tastes and This chapter summarises the main drivers diets in regions around the world suggest: and risk developments affecting the seafood industry over the long term, with a focus on • A world economy rebalancing towards Asia. seafood consumption in particular. This draws • An expanding global middle class (squeezed in on developments that are both observed (by 3rd developed countries). parties) and experienced (by industry operators). • Increased protein consumption with regional Table 3.1 shows the long view of drivers and risk differences, regions in which per capita fish developments affecting seafood consumption, consumption (Fig 3.1): experienced or observed in the period 1997-2008 through to those anticipated in 2019-2029. ◦◦ high and predicted to grow strongly (China, South East Asia and North America) Systemic global risk developments, notably food security and climate change, act as multipliers to ◦◦ high and predicted to grow weakly (East amplify the above risk developments and their Asia and Pacific, Europe and Central Asia, impacts (threats and opportunities). Japan) Table 3.1 The long view: 1997/2007 – 2008/2018 – 2019/2029 Risk Development Driver From To UK economic growth, with Limited economic growth, expanding premiumisation convenience and added overseas markets with greater focus on value products convenience and added value products Constrained supply in traditional Broadening of species and supply Economic developments supplies with opening up of new supply sources with traditional supplies sources potentially constrained Expanded middle - ‘we’re all middle Squeezed middle (low wage economy, class now’ (disposable income/debt reduced disposable income) and savvy increasing) shopper Free trade agreements (UK won’t run Diminishing tariffs (new sources of out of food, but higher prices, less protein) choice) Trade developments Competitive pressure to secure supply, Sporadic supply disruptions in producing more processing in third countries countries (outside UK control) Growing UK population, globalisation, Growing population that is diverse and tourism ageing Population Fragmented, greater demands on Erosion of family as stabiliser individual (work, leisure, caring) Introduction/growth in scrutiny (medical Scrutiny/regulation community ‘don’t eat’ lists), increased Forensic testing (allergies etc) testing Media influence (Incl Influence of social media (trusted Emergence of celebrity chefs NGOs) advocates) Dynamic internet (2nd generation) and Static web information (1st generation) “internet of things” (3rd generation) Outliers Technical innovations driving Technical innovations driving aquaculture (making salmon, prawns, aquaculture (making new species pangasius, available in volume) available in volume) 13
Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish • Global fish production expected to increase, contributed to changing distribution of target based on: species (as some traditional species may move away and warmer water species move in) whilst ◦◦ wild capture having zero growth with in shellfish fisheries there are changes in the aquaculture expanding at a declining rate. prevalence of non-native species/jellyfish. In all fisheries, offshore operations will be impacted ◦◦ concentration in Asia (particularly India, with challenges to safe working conditions and South East Asia and China) driven by gear deployment/performance. species amenable to aquaculture (prawn, salmon, tilapia, carp and pangasius). 17.4-18.2 9.4-9.6 AFR 6.8-5.6 22.9-26.4 64.7-62.2 9.3-9.4 CHN 32.6-41.0 EAP 27.1-23.8 11.0- 32.6-41.0 ECA 17.4-18.2 15.7 27.1-23.8 IND 5.6-6.6 5.6-6.6 JAP 64.7-62.2 6.8-5.6 25.8-29.6 LAC 8.4-7.5 MNA 9.3-9.4 8.4-7.5 NAM 22.9-26.4 SAR 11.0-15.7 SEA 25.8-29.6 ROW 9.4-9.6 Growth in per capita fish consumption by region 2010-2030 (World Bank, 2013: 13, 45) - global average 17.2-18.2 Figure 3.1 Projected growth in per capita fish consumption by region, 2010-2030 (kg/person/year). World Bank (2013:13,45) 3.2 Climate change Climate change may also have implications for aquaculture supplies, especially those originating The main physical climate change impacts of in estuarine areas. There may be impacts from interest to industry are: increased storminess and waves, air or sea temperature change, changes in rainfall/land run- • Sea level rise and extreme water levels off, and acidification. • Changes in storms and waves Onshore, the above risk developments are • Changes in temperature compounded by sea level rise and extreme water levels. This can give rise to impacts affecting • Ocean acidification and de-oxygenation of sea onshore operators: water • Damage to site infrastructure (port & • Changes in terrestrial rainfall (i.e. through processors). surface flooding of land-based infrastructure, plus its role in transferring water, contaminants, • Integrity of electricity supplies. and pollutants from land to sea. • Transport distribution (including ferries). The two main climate change drivers that lead • Integrity of housing and reduced to priority risk developments for wild capture employment. seafood are increased storminess and waves and air or sea temperature change. In shellfish an additional driver is changes in rainfall/land run- off. For whitefish and pelagic fisheries, this has 14
4. UK seafood consumption • All age cohorts are seeking to maintain, or enhance, their standard of living. Overall, – recent and anticipated households are choosing to save less in an developments, impacts and attempt to maintain living standards with some able to achieve this more easily than others. For response example, in general terms: Given the drivers and longer term developments ◦◦ ‘Strivers’ may be increasingly time poor and set out in the previous section, this chapter cash poor identifies the recent and anticipated risk ◦◦ ‘Thrivers’ may be increasingly time poor and developments and impacts for industry. These are cash poor/rich described as they relate to the consumer, proteins, products and outlets (retail and food service). ◦◦ ‘Survivors’ may be increasingly time rich and The chapter concludes with examples of industry cash rich impacts and a list of action areas suggested by way of response to anticipated developments. • ‘Thrivers’ are having more demands put on them; examples include caring for elderly All protein sectors (including seafood) share a relatives (as public services become stretched) common exposure to changing consumption and and younger cohorts remaining at home longer expectations of consumers relating to: (being unable to afford housing), and women having to switch family for work to maintain • Price - a more challenging price environment disposable income. Economic inactivity has (with the upward pressure on prices) reduced for women, with the main reason • Quality - raised expectations of consistent being a decline in the share of women staying quality out of work to look after the family or home. This has not been compensated for by men • Convenience – a desire for products that fit staying at home to look after the family or with increasingly busy lifestyles home. Meanwhile ‘strivers’ are exposed to opportunities that can be increasingly out of • Health – a greater awareness of nutritional reach. merits. • UK population dynamics mean the older cohort • Welfare and resources – an expectation that (‘survivors’) is generally expanding and able these aspects are ‘taken care of’. to work longer, relative to the younger cohorts (‘strivers’ and ‘thrivers’). The development of Whilst the UK meat protein industry may share technology and online services has meant the these concerns, the seafood industry and consumer is more ‘connected’ than ever, and individual sectors within that have exposure in has been relieved of burdensome, mundane different ways. This exposure is briefly explored and time-consuming tasks; increasing leisure in the next few sections. time and exposure to wider influences and opportunities. Yet ironically this is leading to 4.1 Consumers lifestyles that are increasingly fragmented 4.1.1 Recent developments (tastes, smaller households, the ‘always on’ consumer). With a progressively individualistic • UK population has grown at an accelerating society, consumers are increasingly dining rate and is ageing. Population grew by 7.8m alone. Consumers are moving from the since 1980 with about half of this growth traditional lifestyle arranged around ‘three- since 2005; propelled by, amongst others, a meals-a-day’ towards ‘grazing’ that fits around stronger economy (from 2012) and immigration lifestyle. This is reflected in food preparation (particularly from the EU). time (which, in some studies, has fallen from 60 mins in 1980 to 34 mins in 2015). • From 1980-2007 UK households enjoyed a long period of rising household disposable income, • Consumer attitudes are shaped by two coupled with widening inequality. Since 2007 opposing dynamics: value for money for me households have been under pressure with and my family (price, quality, convenience, and disposable incomes having plateaued (younger health) and what’s right for other people and cohorts particularly challenged; older cohorts the wider world (health, welfare, and resources). less so). Household expenditure has shown There has been a long trend towards food a decrease since 2006, with the major cost consumption as a pleasurable experience and items being housing costs (higher share of attitudes that embrace the wider world. Since households renting) and fuel and power. economic conditions tightened from 2008, UK 15
Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish consumer attitudes have sharpened. Greater • Having relegated health concerns in the interest was shown towards me and my family aftermath of the 2008 recession, health (price and quality) relative to other people awareness and nutritional aspects of food (convenience, nutrition, welfare) and the wider has regained ground. Awareness of health world (resources) (see Fig 4.1). As economic as a factor has recovered perhaps as mid- conditions have eased initial sharpening has age cohorts (‘thrivers’) take on caring given way to a widening interest in convenience, responsibilities, those moving into the older nutrition, and welfare (supported by an ageing cohort (‘survivors’) engage with the health population and recent scandals such as agenda (GPs, hospitals, etc) and events such ‘horsegate’). Consumer attitudes around price, as ‘horsegate’ that highlight food fraud and quality and health now have much greater undermine product integrity. influence than sustainability concerns, with the latter remaining a confusing concept to many • Beyond the legal requirements over welfare consumers. and resource, the range of expectations concerning these attributes is broad and in Pre 2007 2008 - 2013 2013+ Figure 4.1 A growing concern for price and widening the case of seafood (with shifting arguments expectations around sustainability) particularly confusing. In the years since 2008, these attributes have • In food, the longer term trend of cheaper diminished in importance relative to price for a food relative to income, and widening access large number of consumers. to food, is being challenged. With significant numbers of consumers of reduced spending 4.1.2 Anticipated in the next five years capacity, there is a growing consumer focus on • Increasing births and net migration will drive price (for consumers in general the price range continued population growth by nearly 0.5 has narrowed and the price ceiling lowered). million p.a. Population is expected to reach The requirement of all age groups has given 73 million (and potentially 79 million) by additional impetus to a longer term trend in 2037. This population will be older (longer life convenience. There has been the rise of the expectancy), and more diverse (immigration). ‘savvy’ shopper, prepared to ‘shop around’ and cut corners in order to maintain an expected • If population increases faster than the economy level of purchasing and range of experiences. then UK consumers will get poorer on a per Product attributes commensurate with busy, capita basis. These developments will increase connected lifestyles include formats suited to pressure on housing, services, and disposable small basket shopping, kit-cooking (a substitute income (consumers will either cut spending or, to the full cooking experience) and versatility failing that, cut savings or increase borrowing). to overcome lack of confidence in cooking skills We might expect this to put further pressure to and encourage experimentation. Attributes be active in the economy (with more pressure suited to the older cohort include product for both parents to work at the expense of formats that match smaller households or looking after the family/home) individual living. 16
• If economic conditions hold rather than • UK meat consumption levels have remained deteriorate, consumers concerns for food will steady since the mid-1970s (although declining continue to focus on function (food as fuel), in recent years), but culinary styles and tastes balancing this where possible with food as an have broadened. Important changes in the experience (emotion and pleasure). Attitudes types of meat eaten include: will continue to focus on me and my family (price, quality, convenience, and health) with an ◦◦ Rise in poultry consumption - increases may expectation that concerns of other people and reflect sector consolidation and declining the wider world (health, welfare, and resources) relative costs, convenience (versatile protein), are ‘taken care of’. and health attributes. • We might expect the consumer to show ◦◦ Decline in red meat, particularly beef and continued sensitivity to food price with low lamb - having suffered a number of food price ceilings before consumers show interest. safety concerns (from BSE to ‘horsegate’) This may mean a growing concern for waste this may have led to lower consumption and and sensitivity to what consumers are getting a focus on higher quality meat. for their money (price of edible protein). ◦◦ Relatively stable consumption of fish - with a • The demands placed on mid-age cohorts broadening of species so that consumers are (particularly ‘thrivers’) are unlikely to retreat. able to switch between close substitutes. Leisure time can be expected to increase in ◦◦ Meat substitutes (such as tofu or Quorn) – value and become part of the ‘value for money these have emerged as alternative options in envelope’. In managing this the shift to grazing traditional meat products (stir-fry, Bolognese, (and further erosion of three-meals-a-day) will etc) and may appeal to certain age cohorts continue, and we may see consumers managing (younger age groups for example). their connectivity (connections reduced to known and trusted parties) to reduce the • Although seafood is perceived to be expensive, ‘always on’ access. To manage leisure time, longer term changes in fish supply have kept consumers will place a higher premium on prices in check by lowering the price floor for convenience. Specifically this may mean higher raw material. This includes switching of wild interest in food that is targeted/available, in capture supplies of whitefish (Alaska pollock for formats that support grazing and reduce waste cod), and innovation in aquaculture introducing (storage, preparation, cooking), and can meet higher supply volumes - specifically in salmon, the time requirement – i.e. supports experience/ shellfish (warmwater prawn) and whitefish experimentation, and offers versatility). (pangasius). Since 2008, the relatively high price of seafood has seen a decline in overall • We may also expect health aspects to be of fish consumption. continuing and growing interest for those in, or approaching, the older cohort (‘thrivers’ • Between 2007 and 2014, overall food prices and ‘survivors’). For these consumers, health increased by 22%. Within this, the price increase features may form part of the value envelope of specific proteins varied: lamb (42%), fish i.e. if the product cannot compete on price then (36%), beef (35%), pork (30%), poultry (13%), experience and health attributes may prove and bacon (12%). With less money, the general attractive features. response from consumers was to spend less and trade down to make savings. Lower income • Beyond the legal requirements, the relative groups were disproportionately affected (spent importance of welfare and resource attributes more, purchased less and saved less than are likely to remain diminished, of major concern average). More specifically, consumers: only to a minority. In seafood, given the levels of confusion, there will be an expectation amongst ◦◦ Increased quantity of pork, spending more, the majority that any legal requirements will be switching to lower priced items ‘taken care of’. ◦◦ Reduced quantity of poultry, spending more, 4.2 Protein and switching to higher priced items 4.2.1 Recent developments ◦◦ Reduced quantity of lamb, lower spend, and switching to lower priced items • UK per capita meat consumption1 is high in global terms but average for western Europe. ◦◦ Reduced quantity of fish/beef/bacon, lower spend, switching to lower price items 1 153g/man/day and 111g/woman/day of red and white meat and fish (DOH National Diet and Nutrition Survey, 2014). 17
Fish as Food: An initial review of developments, implications and practical responses from industry and Seafish • Alongside reasonable prices, the growth in • With recommendations for limiting meat farmed production – and salmon in particular consumption, and red meat in particular, for - has supported the fish category in terms of reasons of health and environmental resources, quality (providing consistency in a category we may expect consumers (particularly ‘thrivers’ otherwise mistrusted, and even feared, by many and ‘survivors’) to look more favourably on consumers). The sheer diversity of seafood is seafood as a protein of choice. However, given a strength in terms of availability but is also a the advice on overall protein intake levels, this weakness in communicating to the consumer. may only go so far. By providing a focus, the continued availability of key species – salmon, cod, haddock, tuna, 4.3 Products and warm water prawn – in suitable formats (e.g. chilled) has presented seafood as a 4.3.1 Recent developments convenient protein option for the consumer. • The greater emphasis on low prices, has forced • With the majority of the UK population the general premiumisation of seafood and red relatively high meat eaters, there is a view meat products relative to products in other that a general overconsumption of protein is a protein categories. In seafood, the ability to health concern. “Meat consumption has already draw on high volumes of key species (salmon, reached excessive levels in many western cod, haddock, warm water prawn etc) has countries, in industrialised countries (including helped to keep certain seafood products within the UK) it’s around twice as much as is deemed the reach of consumers. healthy” (Chatham House, 2015). This, together with safety concerns in other meat categories • Food fraud (mislabelling, deception etc) e.g. red meat, the nutritional benefits of seafood generally, and ‘horsegate’ in particular, has highlights the health standing of this category. increased the attention given to quality and fully processed products have suffered, assisted 4.2.2 Anticipated in the next five years in seafood with declining consistency in 3rd country seafood processing. • Looking ahead, there is a concern that a reduced seafood supply base may raise the • Since the 1960s, the shift to convenience has price floor for supplies, placing upward pressure seen reduced purchases of carcass meats on prices. There is a specific concern that the and increasing interest in processed meat significant increase in salmon production since products and ready meals. Proteins that can the 1990s has reached a plateau and without accommodate this changing product profile further innovation (e.g. offshore farming) have been favoured. More recently convenience is unlikely to be the seafood driver it once has propelled certain product formats (ready was. Much depends on well managed and to cook products and development of kit efficient wild capture fisheries and expanded products) and spurred the decline of others aquaculture. Looking ahead, opportunities in (prepared meals and traditional meals e.g. the supply base include healthy cod stocks and Sunday roast). The range of seafood product farmed pangasius, with other farmed species formats has increased; with the ‘big five’ (e.g. tilapia) deserving further exploration. If the species dominant – supporting the arrival of category becomes more expensive the risk is tuna salad, prawn salad, sushi etc in the last that consumers, with continued price sensitivity, ten years. Beyond the ‘big five’ there is now a will trade down further or trade out of the much longer tail of seafood products (helped category altogether. In leaving the category, by the diversity of fish). In seafood, increased consumers may opt for substitute meat proteins supply and packaging has improved availability, (particularly chicken), or reduce the amount of elevating the chilled category and giving further meat in their overall protein intake. support to the ready to cook product format. Ready to cook products have been further • If seafood supplies are maintained, and advantaged where they can offer versatility. if suitable species are secured, increased Across proteins, particular cuts (mince – the availability could continue to support seafood ‘ultimate kit food’, and ready to cook meats in as a convenient protein in terms of diversity, foil), species (recipe oriented salmon and tuna), format (i.e. chilled) and versatility. However, and proteins (chicken) are better positioned barriers will have to be overcome2: for example to offer this – allowing the consumer to adjust pangasius was introduced to the market these components to a variety of final meals. successfully but convenience has been limited in terms of versatility, and fragmented promotion. • The range of meat-based protein products has Tilapia, meanwhile, has not established itself in evolved and expanded over recent years in the UK despite prevalence elsewhere e.g. North order to keep pace with changing consumer America. expectations regarding food as fuel, food as 2 Fish can suffer from uncertainties such as ‘I don’t know if I’ll like it’ – e.g. “It’s not like a piece of beef or chicken where you know you will like it. It has 18 other things involved, like smell and texture” (Hughes & Bannister, 2015).
convenience, and customised food. • The complexity of welfare and resource attributes as they relate to seafood, provide • The growing attention to health has meant opportunities for specialist seafood products. higher scrutiny of meat products with attention Such products can use these attributes to drawn to negative attributes of red meat - and differentiate themselves within the protein processed products particularly – (for example category, meeting the needs of specific the high salt content and unhealthy fats). consumer groups. Processed products have been challenged further with concerns over product integrity; the recent ‘horsegate’ scandal prompted consumers 4.4 Outlets to ‘trade up’ with some buying less meat Retail and food service have had a symbiotic (particularly ready meals and processed meats) relationship, with innovations in the latter and avoiding cheaper meats. This has meant providing product development opportunities fully prepared products have to ‘work much in the former. In recent years, this has increased harder’ (less salt, reduced fat etc). such that distinctions are beginning to blur; examples include food service outlets operating 4.3.2 Anticipated in the next five years within larger retail outlets to drive footfall. • There is continued risk of increasing price, and Distinctions may be expected to blur further, product premiumisation. This may be held if combining with social media, to shorten the new supplies can contribute to the volume transfer from novelty to mainstream products. market currently held by the big five species This will challenge the supply base by putting (salmon, cod, haddock, tuna and warmwater pressure on the time and cost of producing prawn). prepared/bespoke products. • With convenience becoming a more important 4.4.1 Recent developments (retail) factor, we can expect an expansion of the • Over the longer term the consolidation of convenience food market and products that the retail multiples coupled with the decline can fit with component or kit cooking. New in independent outlets has helped to deliver formats appeal to busy consumers buying volume and keep prices in check for food and perishable foods, not only making life easier seafood. More recently, the shifting interest to but avoiding waste (as larger portions can low price and simplicity has favoured discount be left to go stale), whilst challenging the retailers – with lower overheads that can reduce suitability of existing formats (for example prices substantially - at the expense of the multipacks, for an increasingly individualistic major multiples. In seafood, retail sales volume consumer, may contribute to food waste). has remained static over the last five years, The preference for a chilled format will indicating a decline in volume consumption per remain strong (supporting chilled and refresh head (given population increase). product). Convenience will be tempered by availability and this may see some • In the wider protein context, quality and trust fragmentation in the seafood category (large aspects brought about by product integrity versus niche volumes). Notwithstanding a concerns led some consumers to switch outlets. ‘major event’ affecting the supply base, the big The integrity of red meat, brought about by five species are expected to stay and compete food fraud (including ‘horsegate’ etc), led some more directly with red meat cuts (e.g. mince), consumers to switch from supermarkets to local and chicken for a role in component products. butchers for example. The remaining seafood species are more likely to serve niche products. • A number of structural changes in the retail sector have supported the push for • We might expect health awareness to continue convenience. The major multiples, with large pressure on highly processed products given store footprint, have increased grocery sales health recommendations. These call for value by around 4% in the last five years, whilst consumers to reduce saturated fat and salt discounters and online sales value have doubled intake, whilst highlighting the benefits such (110% and 117% respectively) - albeit from a as reduced blood cholesterol, blood pressure, low base. This broadening of outlets increases heart disease, and some cancers. Although exposure to the consumer and enhances specifically targeted at reduced red meat & availability. processed meat consumption, this may steer consumers to reconsider processed products • The consumer shift towards smaller, more in general (including processed seafood frequent, baskets has spurred the growth of products). discounters allowing them to ‘take the shop window to the customer’. Although enhancing 19
You can also read