SARS-COV-2 DELTA VARIANT PATHOGENESIS IN SYRIAN HAMSTERS AND HOST RESPONSE
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant pathogenesis in Syrian hamsters and host response WHO Global Consultation of vaccine boost strategies Dr. Pragya D Yadav, Scientist E & In-charge Maximum Containment Facility, ICMR-NIV, Pune Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India
B.1.617 and its evolution to Delta Variant ❑ B.1.617 lineage variants were first Phenotypic characteristics reported from India in October 2020 ❑ Sub lineages: B.1.617.1 (Kappa), Transmissibility B.1.617.2 (Delta), B.1.617.3 ❑ Characteristic mutations in the spike gene : D111D, L452R, D614G, P618R and Delta Secondary ±E484Q (Cherian et al., Microorganism 2021) Hospitalizat variant attack rate ion risk ❑ Mutations suggest increased ACE2 binding, transmissibility and escape of neutralization. Reduction in ❑ Further its mutated to Delta AY.1, AY.2 neutralization AY.3 and AY.3.1 with different mutations. (WHO Epidemiological update, July, 2020)
Genomic analysis of COVID-19 breakthrough infections during second wave in different states of India • 86% of the breakthrough infections have been caused by the Delta variant. • Only 9.8 % of breakthrough required hospitalization. • Fatality was observed in only 0.4 % of cases. • The study found that Alpha was predominant in the northern region. • Delta and Kappa mainly caused breakthrough infections in the southern, western, eastern and north-western regions. • Around 71% of these infections were symptomatic and 29% was asymptomatic. [Gupta N & Yadav PD et al., BiorXIv, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.13.21260273]
Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 during breakthrough (March-June, 2021) 4 distinct sub-lineages of the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant observed 86.09% of the breakthrough infections were caused by the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) followed by B.1.1.7 (n=28). B.1.617.1(n=22), B.1.617.3 (n=2), B (n=1), B.1.36 (n=5), B.1.1.294 (n=1), B.1.36.16 (n=1), B.1.1.306 (n=1), and Delta AY.2 (n=1)
Summary of Delta variant pathogenicity study in hamsters using 104 TCID50 • Virus shedding: No significantly high viral shedding observed • Body weight loss: No significant body weight loss observed, least gain was observed in case of Delta • Viral load in respiratory organs: Longer persistence of sgRNA in the nasal turbinates and lungs (14 post infection day) • Lung pathology: Lung disease with moderate severe lesions were observed in case of 35% of Delta infected hamsters Mohandas S et BiorXiv doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.24.453631
Study Design 105.5 TCID50/ml, 1 B.1, Delta, AY.1 15 hamsters/group infection (Euthanized 3, 7, 14 days) Re-infection 105.5 TCID50/ml, B.1 infected vs 2 4 hamsters/group B.1/Delta/AY.1 (Euthanized at 7 post re- Post 3months of 1st infection days) infection Intranasal, 0.1 ml volume Euthanasia and sample collection ❑Virus shedding Nasal wash, throat swab and fecal samples alternate day ❑Pathogenicity Weight loss, viral load, antibody response, lung pathology
Body weight 105.5 TCID50/ml Reinfection (1.4±3.34) (1.74±3.9) (0.67±3.8) (0.23±5.18) (-0.3±3.05) (-9.5±6.5) Significant Delta variant infected hamsters Reinfected hamsters showed significant weight loss showed no weight loss post reinfection
Virus shedding (gRNA and sgRNA level) • Significantly high gRNA load and longer shedding was observed in Delta variant infected hamsters in throat and nasal wash. • Significantly high gRNA load was observed in nasal wash of Delta variant infected hamsters on 8 and 10 DPI.
Re-infection (gRNA and sgRNA level) Post 3 months and 1st infection samples comparison Delta ❑Significantly lower gRNA and sgRNA load in nasal wash and AY.1 throat swab samples of Delta and B.1 re-infected hamsters. B.1 ❑In AY.1 infected animals no significant difference observed.
Viral load in respiratory tract (gRNA and sgRNA level) gRNA sgRNA • Significantly high sgRNA loads were observed in nasal turbinates of Delta variant infected hamsters on14 DPI.
Re-infection (gRNA and sgRNA load in respiratory organs) • A reduction in lung and nasal turbinate viral gRNA loads was observed in case of Delta, although not statistically significant • Lung viral load reduction in case of B.1 infected hamsters was significant.
IgG response in hamsters post infection 105.5 TCID50/ml Re-infection Post 90 days infection • Anti-IgG response could be observed post 90 days in B.1 infected hamsters. • Antibody levels were increased post reinfection irrespective of variant infected.
Neutralizing antibody response post 105.0 TCID50/ml infection study B.1.617.2: 1.8 fold B.1: 1.7 fold B.1: 1.7 fold B.1.617.3: 1.3 fold B.1.617.3: 1.1 fold B.1.617.2: 1.8 fold B.1351: 2.3 fold B.1351: 2.5 fold B.1.351: 2.9 fold • Significant neutralizing antibody reduction against B.1.351 was observed in all infected hamsters Delta (High dose) and re-infection experiment data is awaited
Lung pathology B.1.617.2: 105 TCID50/ml Moderate severity (4/12) B.1.617.3: Moderate severity (1/12) 105.5 TCID50/ml AY.1: Gross lesions (2/10) B.1.617.2 Gross lesions (5/10) B.1.617.2 Focal lesions (2/4) Re-infection AY.1: Focal lesions (1/4) B.1: Focal lesions (1/4)
Lung pathology • Compared to our earlier study, more severe gross lung lesions were observed with 105.5 TCID50/ ml in Delta infected animals. • In case of reinfected hamsters, only focal lung lesions were observed.
Conclusions • Delta and Delta AY1. lineage variants showed pathogenicity in hamsters. • Disease severity & virus shedding proportional to the virus dose in case of Delta Variant • Longer persistence of sgRNA in the upper respiratory tract for Delta infected animals could be an indicator for transmissibility, transmission experiments should be performed further. • Lung disease with severe lesions and body weight loss was observed in case of Delta variant infected hamsters, indicating the potential of the variant to cause severe disease in hamster model • Significant neutralizing antibody reduction against Beta variant in case of B.1/ Delta /B.1.617.3 infected variants • Reinfection with Delta and B.1 caused reduced nasal shedding • Reinfection with Delta, B.1 and AY.1 prevented body weight loss, gross pneumonic changes in B.1 infection recovered hamsters.
Neutralization of Beta and Delta variant with sera of COVID-19 recovered cases and vaccinees of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine BBV152/Covaxin ➢The neutralization potential of the BBV152 has been already studied with the B.1, Alpha, Zeta and Kappa found to be effective against these variants. ➢COVID-19 recovered cases (n = 20) post 5–20 weeks of infection and vaccinees 28 days after two doses of BBV152 (n = 17) against Beta, Delta variants and compared with prototype B.1 (D614G). ➢The recovered cases were infected with B.1 (n = 17) and B.1.617.1 lineage (n = 3). Yadav et al, J Travel Med, taab104, https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taab104
Neutralization of Beta and Delta variant with sera of COVID-19 recovered cases and vaccinees of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine BBV152/Covaxin The GMT ratio of vaccinees sera B.1 to Beta and Delta variants was 3.0 and 2.7 . The GMT ratio of sera of recovered cases B.1 to Beta and Delta variants was 3.3 and 4.6. A significant reduction in neutralization titre of COVID-19 recovered and BBV152 vaccinee sera against Beta and Delta in comparison B.1 Yadav et al, J Travel Med, taab104, ttps://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taab104
Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Delta AY.1 and Delta in individuals sera vaccinated with BBV152 and comparison with B.1 Delta Delta AY.1 Sera of Covid naïve vaccinees 1.3-fold 1.5-fold Recovered cases with full vaccination 2.5-fold 3.5,-fold breakthrough cases 1.9-fold 2.8-fold
• However, with the observed high titers, the sera of individuals belonging to all the aforementioned groups they would still neutralize the Delta, Delta AY.1 and B.1.617.3 variants effectively.
Neutralization of Delta variant with sera of Covishield™ vaccinees and COVID-19 recovered vaccinated individuals Covishield™ vaccinated individuals’ (n=116) sera in different categories was tested against prototype strain B.1 (D614G) and Delta variant. All the sera were collected four weeks post-vaccination for category I- IV participants Sera under five categories: I. one dose (n=31), II. Two doses (n=31), III. COVID-19 recovered plus one dose (n=15), infected with B.1 lineage IV. COVID-19 recovered plus two doses (n=19) and infected with B.1 lineage V. breakthrough COVID-19 cases (n=20). infected with Kappa and Delta variants All the sera were collected four weeks post-vaccination for category I- IV participants.
Neutralization of Delta variant with sera of Covishield™ vaccinees and COVID-19recovered vaccinated individuals ❑ NAb against B.1 were not observed in 11/31 (35.5%) participants in category I. ❑ Similarly, NAb against the Delta were not observed in 18/31 (58.1%) and 5/31 (16.1%) participants of categories I and II respectively. ❑ Participants in one dose (4.5 fold) and 2 dose (3.2 fold) showed reductions in NAb titers against Delta variants as compared to B.1 lineage. ❑ We observed significantly lower NAb titers (3.2-4.5-fold) for the Delta relative to B.1 variant. ❑ However, NAbs in breakthrough participants and the COVID-19 recovered individuals with one or two-dose vaccination had relatively higher protection against Delta in comparison to the vaccinees with one or two dose vaccination.
Acknowledgements ICMR –NIV, Pune team ❖ Dr. Priya Abraham, Director ❖ Dr Sreelekshmy Mohandas, Scientist B, ❖ Dr Anita Shete, Scientist D, ❖ Dr Gajanan Sapkal, Scientist E ❖ Dr. Gururaj Deshpande , Scientist B ICMR-HQ ❖ Dr. Prof Balaram Bhargava, Sec DHR and DG, ❖ Dr. Samiran Panda, ECD Chief , ICMR ❖ Dr. Nivedita Gupta, Virology Chief, ECD, ICMR-HQ
You can also read