Recent and future threats to the Endangered Cuban toad Peltophryne longinasus: potential additive impacts of climate change and habitat loss

Page created by Bradley Schneider
 
CONTINUE READING
Recent and future threats to the Endangered Cuban
             toad Peltophryne longinasus: potential additive
             impacts of climate change and habitat loss
                                                                                    M A R L O N E . C O B O S and R O B E R T O A L O N S O B O S C H

             Abstract Habitat loss and climate change are major threats                             Introduction
             to amphibian species worldwide. We combined niche mod-
             elling under various climatic scenarios with analysis of habi-
             tat loss and the appropriateness of Cuban protected areas to                           T     he causes of global amphibian decline are diverse but
                                                                                                          the majority are anthropogenic (Carey & Alexander,
                                                                                                    ; Beebee & Griffiths, , Brum et al., ). Given
             identify major risk zones for the Endangered Cuban toad
             Peltophryne longinasus. Four subspecies with disjunct distri-                          the complexity of ecological processes the causes of species
             butions associated with mountain forests are recognized.                               decline are typically studied and managed in isolation but
             Our results suggest that the western subspecies, P. longina-                           multiple threats, such as climate change and habitat loss
             sus longinasus and P. longinasus cajalbanensis, are at risk                            (Mantyka-Pringle et al., ), can affect species and ecosys-
             from global warming, habitat degradation and potential                                 tems concurrently (Rohr et al., ). Furthermore, changes
             additive effects. Peltophryne longinasus dunni, in central                             in climate could modify dispersion and infection character-
             Cuba, has the lowest threat level related to climate change                            istics of the chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
             and habitat loss but could become increasingly threatened                              (Pounds et al., ; Rödder et al., ). Although a global
             by the presence of the infectious disease chytridiomycosis.                            estimate of areas at risk from the occurrence of these threats
             The eastern subspecies, P. longinasus ramsdeni, faces mod-                             has been developed (Hof et al., ), variation in local con-
             erate impacts of climate change and habitat loss; however,                             ditions and species necessitates greater precision in identify-
             low opportunity of migration to new areas and population                               ing priority areas for conservation and management
             decline justify a high threatened status for this subspecies.                          (Mantyka-Pringle et al., ).
             Our results predict minor temperature increases and pre-                                   Peltophryne longinasus is a bufonid endemic to Cuba and
             cipitation decreases in the future. Nevertheless, at the bio-                          is a uniquely polytypic species of the genus in the Caribbean
             logical level these changes could generate variations in                               basin (Henderson & Powell, ). There are four recog-
             species physiology, vocal behaviour and prey availability,                             nized subspecies, with disjunct distributions in mountain-
             and could probably increase the risk of predation. In Cuba                             ous areas (Díaz & Cádiz, ). Peltophryne longinasus
             protected areas have contributed to avoiding excessive forest                          longinasus and P. longinasus cajalbanensis inhabit the
             loss but the potential impact of climate change was not con-                           Alturas de Pizarras in the south of Pinar del Río province
             sidered in their original design. Our findings confirm that all                        and Cajálbana upland, respectively. Peltophryne longinasus
             subspecies of P. longinasus are threatened but management                              dunni is distributed in the Guamuhaya mountain range in
             measures should be tailored according to the various pre-                              the centre of the island and is threatened by the chytrid fun-
             dicted impacts.                                                                        gus (Díaz et al., ). Although only one sick and dying in-
                                                                                                    dividual has been found, in October , the presence of
             Keywords Amphibian decline, Bufonidae, climate change,                                 the disease in this population was confirmed. Since that
             forest cover loss, habitat suitability models, Peltophryne,                            date no more cases have been reported. Peltophryne longina-
             protected areas                                                                        sus ramsdeni is known only from the Guaso upland in
             To view supplementary material for this article, please visit                          Guantanamo province, in eastern Cuba, but it has not
             https://doi.org/./S                                              been found since  (Valdes de la Osa & Ruiz García,
                                                                                                    ).
                                                                                                        This diurnal species occupies a variety of vegetation
                                                                                                    types, mainly woodlands (pinewoods and mesic broadleaf
                                                                                                    forests) and secondary vegetation, at altitudes of – m
                                                                                                    (Valdes de la Osa & Ruiz García, ; Díaz & Cádiz, ),
             MARLON E. COBOS Departamento de Biología Animal y Humana, Facultad de                  and reproduces in mountain streams (Valdés de la Osa &
             Biología, Universidad de La Habana, Havana, Cuba                                       Ruiz García, ). Peltophryne longinasus is categorized
             ROBERTO ALONSO BOSCH (Corresponding author) Museo de Historia Natural                  as Endangered on the IUCN Red List because its Area of
             Felipe Poey, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de La Habana, street 25 #455.           Occupancy is ,  km, its distribution is severely frag-
             Vedado, Plaza de la Revolución, Havana, 10400, Cuba
             E-mail ralonso@fbio.uh.cu                                                              mented and the extent of its upland forest habitat is declin-
             Received  January . Revision requested  March .
                                                                                                    ing (Hedges & Díaz, ). Its threat status, ecological and
             Accepted  June . First published online  October .                         morphological features and disjunct distribution make it an

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
Threats to an Endangered Cuban toad                      117

           ideal species to evaluate the additive threats of climate                              predict rather than infer, as it may lead to a ‘less wrong’ re-
           change and habitat loss.                                                               sult than when operating with only a single, irrelevant pre-
               Habitat fragmentation and climate change have been re-                             dictor arbitrarily.
           cognized as two principal threats to biodiversity in Cuba                                 To evaluate the effect of climate change by  and 
           (CITMA, ) but their possible additive impacts on am-                               on the potential distribution of P. longinasus we used two
           phibian diversity have received little consideration. Here                             Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios
           we () evaluate the potential impact of predicted climate                              (. and .) of the general circulation model of the
           change scenarios for  and  on habitats suitable                                Beijing Climate Center. These scenarios describe two cli-
           for P. longinasus, () estimate habitat loss (measured as for-                         matic configurations based on different concentrations of
           est lost) during – in the areas suitable for this spe-                         greenhouse gases (Moss et al., ). The RCP . scenario
           cies, () identify suitable areas for P. longinasus affected by                        assumes that concentrations of greenhouse gases will in-
           additive stressors (habitat loss, disease and climate change),                         crease in the future, reaching a maximum by , and
           and () assess the representation of suitable areas for the                            the RCP . assumes that concentrations will continue to in-
           species (for ,  and  scenarios) and the threats                            crease even up to  (IPCC, ). Future bioclimatic vari-
           it faces within Cuban protected areas.                                                 ables were obtained from the WorldClim database.

           Study area                                                                             Habitat suitability models and projections
           The study area (the Cuban archipelago) was divided into                                We used distribution records (Alonso, ) and the afore-
           four physical–geographical regions (Fig. ), simplifying the                           mentioned bioclimatic variables as presence and environmen-
           regionalization of Mateo & Acevedo (). Regions inhab-                              tal data. To prevent possible errors duplicate records were
           ited by P. longinasus (western, central and eastern Cuba)                              removed. With the remaining  samples and selected vari-
           comprise the more densely forested areas of the archipelago                            ables we created habitat suitability models in MaxEnt ..k
           (Mateo & Acevedo, ).                                                               (Phillips et al., ), using its default configuration and 
                                                                                                  replicates for bootstrapping. To obtain presence–absence
                                                                                                  data from the mean logistic model we used the th percentile
           Methods                                                                                threshold (Peterson et al., ), which should not be sensitive
           We used ecological niche models to identify areas suitable                             to extreme environmental values (Radosavljevic & Anderson,
           for P. longinasus and predict future changes in these areas.                           ). We consider it to be appropriate because a small sample
           We evaluated recent forest loss using the results of Hansen                            size could increase the weight of extreme records in the model
           et al. (), to identify patterns and levels of habitat degrad-                      (Araujo & Peterson, ) and consequently the estimated
           ation. We also assessed climate change in areas where suit-                            area of suitable habitat for the species. To evaluate model per-
           able conditions will decline in the future, using the                                  formance we used the area under the receiver operating char-
           bioclimatic variables of the WorldClim database (Hijmans                               acteristic curve (AUC; Phillips et al., ), difference of AUC
           et al., ). With the resultant information we identified                            (AUCDIFF; Warren & Seifert, ) and % training omission
           suitable areas potentially affected by additive threats from                           rate (Peterson et al., ).
           climate change, habitat loss and chytridiomycosis. We also                                 Habitat suitability models created for the year  were
           evaluated the representation of the suitable areas and threats                         projected to  and  using MaxEnt. Results of each
           in protected areas.                                                                    projection were compared with the initial model, consider-
                                                                                                  ing the change in suitable areas (presence areas). For the
                                                                                                  future projections we identified areas where suitable
           Climatic data                                                                          climatic conditions for P. longinasus could be lost, suitable
                                                                                                  areas consistent with compared scenarios, and potentially
           The modelling dataset included  bioclimatic variables                                new suitable areas. The conserved range is the area of over-
           (Table ) obtained from the WorldClim database version                                 lap between each of the projected ranges and the  range.
           . (S data group) at a resolution of  arc-seconds                                      Where a loss of suitable habitat was predicted we used
           (Hijmans et al., ). We selected these variables on the as-                         QGIS . (QGIS Development Team, ) to calculate dif-
           sumption that they are most strongly related to the natural                            ferences in variables between  and projected values for
           history of the studied species. We did not check for collin-                            and  (using all pixel values) for the two scenarios
           earity among our selected variables. We followed the criteria                          (RCP . and .).
           of Braunisch et al. (), who stated that the inclusion of                               We used data from the Global Forest Change database
           several correlated, potentially relevant variables in the                              (Hansen et al., ) to evaluate loss of forest cover, which
           same model may be preferable when the intention is to                                  we considered to be an indicator of fragmentation and

           Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
118         M. E. Cobos and R. Alonso Bosch

                                                                                                                                          FIG. 1 Distribution of records of
                                                                                                                                          Peltophryne longinasus in Cuba,
                                                                                                                                          which is divided into physical–
                                                                                                                                          geographical regions, based on
                                                                                                                                          Mateo & Acevedo ().

             habitat loss. We estimated annual forest loss (resolution                            variables were annual mean temperature (BIO), maximum
             m) in the quadrants that include the Cuban archipelago, and                            temperature of warmest month (BIO), and temperature
             extracted the areas of interest in the layer composition of                            seasonality (BIO). The logistic output for  revealed a
             forest cover loss (–), using the suitable areas iden-                          high probability of presence of P. longinasus in mountain
             tified by habitat suitability modelling. In QGIS we calculated                         zones in all three regions inhabited by the species. In the
             the surface area of deteriorated areas by year for each region                         initial binary results (Fig. a,b) derived from reclassification
             and for all areas of suitable habitat, attempting to discrim-                          of the mean logistic model (probability of presence
             inate between vegetation types according to the vegetation                             . . = mean th percentile threshold) we observed a
             map of Estrada et al. ().                                                          fragmented pattern with suitable areas in all regions except
                 To detect areas affected by additive stressors we created a                        Camagüey-Maniabón.
             map of known distribution records of P. longinasus subspe-
             cies, projected climate change, trends in temperature and                              Potential modifications of suitable areas Suitable areas for
             precipitation, habitat loss (density of forest cover loss),                            P. longinasus (Fig. a,b) in  represented .% of all
             and reported presence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis.                               Cuban territory, with substantial decreases predicted by
             Potential impacts of climate change were categorized as                                future projections (Fig. c,d). By  losses of .%
             High, Medium or Low (based on projected habitat loss),                                 (RCP .) and .% (RCP .) of suitable habitat are
             and were compared among regions. We also identified                                    expected, and the western region will be most affected,
             areas predicted to become more suitable for P. longinasus                              with reductions of . and .% in the respective
             as a result of climate change.                                                         scenarios (Table ). Projections for  are similar, with
                 We assessed the importance of protected areas for                                  decreases of .% (RCP .) and .% (RCP .).
             conservation of P. longinasus and its habitats using the                               However, in the Sierra Maestra mountain range (eastern
             map of Cuba’s national system of protected areas (CNAP,                                region) the area of suitable habitat is predicted to increase
             ). We calculated the area of current and future suitable                           significantly in scenario RCP . (Fig. c,d), but P.
             habitat for the species within protected areas. We also                                longinasus has never been found there. In scenario RCP
             estimated the area of suitable habitat that will potentially                           ., even though suitable habitat is predicted to diminish
             be lost under future climate scenarios. Finally, we com-                               by , an improvement relative to  is expected by
             pared the areas of forest loss in suitable habitat areas                               , especially in the central and western regions. The
             inside and outside protected areas in each region of the                               conserved range (suitable areas consistent with compared
             study area.                                                                            scenarios) will be proportionally higher in the central and
                                                                                                    eastern regions in comparison with the western region
                                                                                                    (Table ). Suitable areas are expected to be found at higher
             Results                                                                                altitudes in the future (relative to ). By  mean
                                                                                                    altitudinal increases of . m (RCP .) and . m
             Habitat suitability models Habitat suitability models                                  (RCP .) are projected. By  the altitude of suitable
             yielded high mean values of AUC (. ± SD .), low                                  habitat could increase by  m (RCP .) and . m
             AUCDIFF (. ± SD .) and a mean % training                                       (RCP .) relative to .
             omission rate of . ± SD .. The AUC results indicate
             good predictive power, and AUCDIFF and the % training
             omission rate indicate that overfitting could be avoided                               Expected climate change in areas predicted to become
             in these models. The major contributing bioclimatic                                    unsuitable for P. longinasus In areas where suitable

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
Threats to an Endangered Cuban toad                      119

           TABLE 1 The potential distribution range of the Cuban toad Peltophryne longinasus in western, central and eastern Cuba in , and pro-
           jected values for  and  under two climate change scenarios (RCP . and RCP .). The conserved range is the area of overlap
           between each of the projected ranges with the  range.

                                   Western                              Central                              Eastern                             Total
                                   Potential          Conserved         Potential          Conserved         Potential          Conserved        Potential           Conserved
                                   distribution       range             distribution       range             distribution       range            distribution        range
           Scenario*      Year     range (km2)        (km2)             range (km2)        (km2)             range (km2)        (km2)            range (km2)         (km2)
                          2000     1,012.02                             1,015.89                             1,270.27                            3,298.18
           RCP 2.6        2050       156.97           156.71              578.13           577.84            1,053.33           880.46           1,788.43            1,615.01
                          2070       257.84           257.22              611.20           610.96              951.55           814.54           1,820.59            1,682.72
           RCP 8.5        2050        66.24            66.24              459.27           459.27              964.43           706.43           1,489.93            1,231.93
                          2070         0.00             0.00              336.35           336.35              595.63           381.54             931.98              717.89
           *RCP . assumes that concentrations of greenhouse gases will increase in the future, reaching a maximum by , and RCP . assumes that concentra-
           tions will continue to increase even up to .

           conditions for the species will be lost, values of all                                 change and chytridiomycosis, and habitat loss and
           temperature variables (except mean diurnal range,                                      chytridiomycosis. The first combination was detected
           BIO) are expected to increase in both climate scenarios                               throughout the species’ range (Fig. ) but the level of
           (Table ). Significant increases of temperature and                                    impact varied among regions, and therefore the subspecies
           decreases of three of six precipitation variables by                               will be affected differentially. The greatest impacts of climate
           are predicted (RCP .). Precipitation in the driest                                   change with habitat loss were observed in the western
           month and driest quarter (BIO and BIO ) is                                         region, intermediate impacts were detected in the eastern
           predicted to decrease significantly by  (RCP .).                                 region, and the lowest impact was observed in the central
           Similarly, a reduction in precipitation seasonality                                    region. The second and third types of additive threats
           (coefficient of variation) by  is expected (RCP .).                              appear to occur only in the central region, as a result of
           We also recorded increments in precipitation in the                                    the reported presence of chytridiomycosis in this zone and
           wettest month (BIO) and precipitation seasonality                                    the absence of connectivity with other regions.
           (BIO) by  (RCP .) and  (RCP .) (Table ).

                                                                                                  Importance of protected areas The current percentage of
           Habitat loss in areas that were suitable in 2000 Total initial                         suitable habitat area for P. longinasus (Fig. b) within
           forest cover () in areas suitable for P. longinasus                                protected areas is .% but this is expected to decrease
           comprised ,. km, with the majority of the                                       under all future scenarios (Supplementary Table S). The
           vegetation distributed in the eastern region (Fig. ). The                             eastern region had the highest initial and future
           most significant forest loss during – took place                               representations of suitable habitat within protected areas
           in the western region (Figs  & ), where major losses                                 in all evaluated scenarios. We predict that by  (RCP
           were recorded in . Significant reductions in forest                                .) suitable areas within protected areas will be reduced
           cover occurred in the central and eastern regions in                               by .%, and by  .%. In the RCP . scenario
           and , respectively (Fig. b). Peltophryne longinasus                               we predict reductions of . and .% by  and
           has been recorded in at least eight distinct vegetation                                , respectively. Nevertheless, the majority of the
           formations (Supplementary Table S). These formations                                  reduction in suitable areas in the future (Fig. c,d) will
           occupy .% of the species’ total suitable area. We                                  occur outside protected areas, with only .–.% of
           identified that secondary vegetation, Pinus caribaea and P.                            losses occurring within protected areas (Supplementary
           tropicalis pinewoods, were most affected in the western                                Table S). We detected considerable differences in forest
           region, submontane mesophyllous evergreen forests and                                  loss during – inside and outside protected areas
           secondary vegetation in the central, and submontane                                    (Supplementary Table S), with only .% of the forest
           mesophyllous evergreen forests in the eastern region.                                  loss occurring inside protected areas.

           Areas affected by additive stressors Predicted future trends                           Discussion
           include an increase in temperature and a decrease in
           precipitation throughout the entire area of suitable habitat                           Our results indicate that, in the future, areas of habitat suit-
           for P. longinasus. Three types of additive threats have also                           able for P. longinasus will be reduced. Similar studies have
           been identified: climate change and habitat loss, climate                              reported spatial changes in suitable areas (decrease and

           Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 120
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 M. E. Cobos and R. Alonso Bosch
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    TABLE 2 Mean values (min., max.) of bioclimatic variables for the initial () distribution range of P. longinasus, and differences between projected values for  and  under two
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    climate scenarios (RCP . and RCP .) and  values.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Variables                           2000                           2050–2000, RCP 2.6          2050–2000, RCP 8.5            2070–2000, RCP 2.6             2070–2000, RCP 8.5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO1 (annual mean temperature)         22.26 (16.71, 24.93)           0.99 (0.90, 1.10)           1.51 (1.40, 1.60)             0.99 (0.90, 1.10)               2.21 (2.10, 2.30)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO2 (mean diurnal range)               9.48 (7.78, 10.11)           −0.02 (−0.10, 0.09)         −0.03 (−0.10, 0.00)           −0.02 (−0.10, 0.10)             −0.03 (−0.10, 0.00)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO4 (temperature seasonality)         18.72 (14.88, 21.67)           0.53 (−0.18, 0.98)          0.50 (−0.38, 1.20)            0.09 (−0.23, 0.39)              0.96 (−0.64, 2.15)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO5 (maximum temperature of           29.39 (23.01, 32.23)           1.06 (0.90, 1.10)           1.54 (1.40, 1.60)             1.00 (0.80, 1.10)               2.23 (2.10, 2.40)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    warmest month)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO6 (minimum temperature of           14.48 (10.05, 16.77)            0.97 (0.90, 1.00)           1.38 (1.30, 1.46)             0.91 (0.80, 1.00)               1.98 (1.70, 2.30)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    coldest month)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO8 (mean temperature of wet-         24.11 (18.19, 27.23)            1.01 (0.07, 1.70)           1.27 (0.60, 2.05)             1.08 (0.20, 1.60)               2.17 (1.30, 2.47)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    test quarter)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO10 (mean temperature of             24.37 (18.59, 27.23)            1.08 (0.91, 1.20)           1.55 (1.40, 1.69)             0.97 (0.90, 1.09)               2.27 (2.10, 2.40)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    warmest quarter)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO12 (annual precipitation)        1,621.43 (1,350.64, 2,083.59) −132.79 (−192.81, 7.29)      −88.56 (−156.67, −46.13)      −150.67 (−210.64, −107.86) −310.49 (−449.32, −168.52)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO13 (precipitation of wettest       245.25 (203.77, 316.36)      −17.45 (−72.60, 15.67)       16.37 (−26.12, 58.78)          11.73 (−63.22, 72.69)     −27.04 (−69.41, 37.26)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    month)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO14 (precipitation of driest         45.21 (16.61, 78.58)          −0.41 (−20.93, 7.00)        −1.37 (−15.27, 7.12)         −11.19 (−24.59, 1.76)            −2.40 (−16.47, 6.00)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    month)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO15 (precipitation seasonality)      52.61 (35.87, 67.49)          −3.88 (−9.00, 0.15)      1.53 (−4.28, 8.97)                5.27 (−0.84, 16.89)          −3.13 (−11.00, 6.08)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO16 (precipitation of wettest       630.59 (486.02, 795.28)       −43.83 (−114.71, 18.36) −14.46 (−86.73, 50.78)            −30.64 (−113.50, 12.30)       −135.21 (−246.68, −20.99)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    quarter)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    BIO17 (precipitation of driest        171.30 (90.36, 260.33)         −1.20 (−13.36, 25.77)     −10.59 (−44.64, 11.05)         −23.90 (−47.43, 4.04)           −11.88 (−40.58, 3.83)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    quarter)
Threats to an Endangered Cuban toad                      121

                                                                                                                                        FIG. 2 Result of habitat suitability
                                                                                                                                        models for Peltophryne longinasus:
                                                                                                                                        Potential distribution range of
                                                                                                                                        Peltophryne longinasus for 
                                                                                                                                        (a & b). Predicted change in
                                                                                                                                        species potential distribution
                                                                                                                                        ranges by (c)  and (d) .

           displacement of ranges) for many herpetofaunal species in                              needed to investigate the capability of each subspecies to
           Europe and South America (Araújo et al., ; Zank et al.,                            move to higher altitudes, and to obtain a better understand-
           ; Courtois et al., ). Suitable areas for P. longinasus                         ing of the impact of climate change on this species sensu
           will be found at high altitudes; this concurs with the general                         lato.
           evidence of changes in species’ distributions in response to                               Projected decreases in precipitation could also affect the
           global warming (Walther et al., ; Raxworthy et al.,                                typical reproductive phenology of P. longinasus. Such de-
           ). However, the archipelagic nature of Cuba, the lack                              creases could reduce the spatial and temporal accessibility
           of connectivity among ranges and the presence of barriers                              of sites for calling and breeding, and also affect nesting suc-
           will impede future movement of the subspecies of P. longi-                             cess and optimum larval development. In the microhabitat
           nasus to places with suitable conditions at other latitudes                            of P. longinasus longinasus air temperature is –°C (Díaz
           (i.e. the Sierra Maestra mountain range). Displacement to                              & Cádiz, ) and forecasted changes in bioclimatic vari-
           adjacent locations at higher altitudes within the same region                          ables include temperature changes. At the biological level
           is therefore the most likely alternative.                                              these could generate variations in physiology, vocal behav-
               Not all subspecies have the same opportunity and ability                           iour and the availability and accessibility of prey, and could
           to move to higher altitudes in the same region. Our results                            potentially increase the risk of predation (Blaustein et al.,
           suggest that P. longinasus dunni has more opportunities for                            ; Li et al., ).
           displacement because suitable areas adjacent to its current                                Amphibian species with small ranges tend to have more
           range will be less affected compared to other subspecies in                            habitat specificity, which makes them vulnerable to habitat
           other regions. Further studies on movement patterns are                                alterations (Williams & Hero, ). The deterioration in

           Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
122         M. E. Cobos and R. Alonso Bosch

                                                                                                                                         FIG. 3 (a) Forest cover in the
                                                                                                                                         potential distribution range of
                                                                                                                                         Peltophryne longinasus in ,
                                                                                                                                         and total forest loss during –
                                                                                                                                         , in the western, central and
                                                                                                                                         eastern regions of Cuba (Fig. ).
                                                                                                                                         (b) Forest loss per year during
                                                                                                                                         – in each region.

                                                                                                                                          FIG. 4 Density of forest cover loss
                                                                                                                                          during – in areas of
                                                                                                                                          initially suitable habitat for
                                                                                                                                          Peltophryne longinasus in the
                                                                                                                                          western, central and eastern
                                                                                                                                          regions of Cuba.

                                                                                                                                          FIG. 5 Additive stressors of
                                                                                                                                          climate change and habitat loss on
                                                                                                                                          the distribution range of
                                                                                                                                          Peltophryne longinasus in Cuba.

             forest cover is resulting in loss and fragmentation of habitats                           Other studies have suggested potential synergistic effects
             of P. longinasus in some of its most frequented vegetation                             of climate change and other stressors when they co-occur
             types (e.g. Pinus forests). Although we have taken into ac-                            (Pyke, ; Brook et al., ; Mantyka-Pringle et al.,
             count a period of only  years prior to our future projec-                            ). We have identified areas where additive effects of glo-
             tions, there was no apparent decrease in deforestation                                 bal warming and habitat loss could be occurring, alerting us
             within this period, and deforestation is likely to continue, es-                       to potential synergies between these threats (Fig. ).
             pecially outside protected areas. In fragmented landscapes                                Peltophryne longinasus longinasus and P. longinasus ca-
             dispersion is often insufficient to maintain population via-                           jalbanensis will face major risks from the additive effects of
             bility (Cushman, ), and processes such as habitat split                            global warming and habitat degradation. Peltophryne long-
             are common in fragmented landscapes with complex topog-                                inasus dunni (which may represent a distinctive form and is
             raphy (Becker et al., ). Forest cover loss is therefore a                          probably a ninth species of Cuban Peltophryne; Alonso et al.,
             significant concern, as it has been shown that habitat split,                          ) is the subspecies with the lowest level of risk linked to
             loss and fragmentation affect principally species with aquat-                          these threats; however, it may also be threatened by the pres-
             ic larvae (Fonseca et al., ).                                                      ence of the chytrid fungus. This pathogen disperses rapidly

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
Threats to an Endangered Cuban toad                              123

           (Lips et al., ) and its spread may be facilitated by an-                           Acknowledgements
           thropogenic activities (Weldon et al., ; Fisher &
           Garner, ). Establishment and intensity of infection                                Many people helped RAB during the field expeditions to lo-
           are highest in elevated places with lower temperatures and                             cate and verify the presence of the Cuban toad: Ariel
           higher precipitation (Drew et al., ). Nevertheless,                                Rodríguez, L. Yusnaviel García, Arturo Hernández, Luis
           there is evidence that warmer years favour the development                             Alvarez Lajonchere, and Rafael García-Morera. RAB thanks
           of the fungus at high elevations (Pounds et al., ; Harvell                         the National Center of Cuban Protected Areas and the
           et al., ). Peltophryne longinasus ramsdeni will suffer                             Center for Inspection and Environmental Control for sup-
           intermediate effects in comparison with the other three sub-                           port and permission to access the study areas. Rafael
           species. The almost non-existent possibility of migration to                           Marquez and Chrystal S. Mantyka-Pringle provided com-
           new, potentially suitable areas and the absence of records of                          ments on the text. Boris Fabres and Sergio J. Pastrana helped
           this subspecies since  justify its highly threatened status.                       to improve the English. Prof. Tim Halliday offered valuable
           However, it cannot yet be categorized as Extinct, given the                            suggestions and corrections to the language, and helped
           few observations in the field and the lack of information on                           enhance the quality of the article. Two anonymous re-
           its biology, population size and habitat use. Based on our                             viewers provided constructive criticism. MEC is grateful
           precautionary criteria we therefore categorize this subspe-                            for the support received during his postgraduate studies
           cies as Critically Endangered, Possibly Extinct (CR Aac;                              from the Secretaria Nacional de Educación Superior,
           IUCN, ), until further surveys confirm, or not, that no                            Ciencia y Tecnología and the Instituto de Fomento del
           individuals remain.                                                                    Talento Humano.
               Our results show that all subspecies of P. longinasus are
           threatened; however, each one requires different research
           and management priorities according to the identified im-                              Author contributions
           pacts. Habitat protection and restoration efforts could be a
           priority, especially in western areas where the major risks                            MEC and RAB conceived the study and wrote the article.
           are potentially the additive effects of climate change and                             RAB conducted all fieldwork and compiled the original
           habitat loss. Further efforts are required to clarify the exist-                       database of geographical localities. MEC analysed the data
           ence, prevalence, dissemination and pathogenicity of the                               and performed the modelling.
           chytrid fungus in relation to other natural and anthropogen-
           ic stressors in the central region. Some ex situ conservation
           initiatives began  years ago with a preliminary captive
                                                                                                  References
           breeding protocol for P. longinasus longinasus (Díaz &
           Cádiz, ). However, the differences in ecology and be-                              A LO N S O , R. () Origen y diversificación del género Peltophryne
           haviour of subspecies (Valdés de la Osa & Ruiz García,                                    (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae) en Cuba. PhD thesis. University of
           ) necessitate the development of variants of this                                     Havana, Havana, Cuba.
           protocol.                                                                              A LO N S O , R., C R AW F O R D , A.J. & B E R M I N G H A M , E. () Molecular
                                                                                                     phylogeny of an endemic radiation of Cuban toads (Bufonidae:
               Amphibians are the group with the most species whose                                  Peltophryne) based on mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Journal of
           ranges fall completely outside protected areas (Nori et al.,                              Biogeography, , –.
           ). Although the original design of Cuba’s national sys-                            A R A Ú J O , M.B. & P E T E R S O N , A.T. () Uses and misuses of
           tem of protected areas does not provide adequate protection                               bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology, , –.
           for amphibians (Fong et al., ) and fails in the represen-                          A R A Ú J O , M.B., T H U I L L E R , W. & P E A R S O N , R.G. () Climate
                                                                                                     warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe.
           tation of suitable areas for P. longinasus (Supplementary                                 Journal of Biogeography, , –.
           Table S), it appears to have contributed to avoiding exces-                           B E C K E R , C.G., F O N S E C A , C.R., H A D D A D , C.F.B. & P R A D O , P.I. ()
           sive forest loss (Supplementary Table S).                                                Habitat split as a cause of local population declines of amphibians
               Integration of multiple approaches and perspectives                                   with aquatic larvae. Conservation Biology, , –.
           is needed to obtain more accurate information about                                    B E E B E E , T.J.C. & G R I F F I T H S , R.A. () The amphibian decline crisis:
                                                                                                     a watershed for conservation biology? Biological Conservation, ,
           how species and habitats may respond to climate change
                                                                                                     –.
           (Dawson et al., ). The synergies between ecological/                               B L A U S T E I N , A.R., H A N , B.A., R E LY E A , R.A., J O H N S O N , P.T., B U C K ,
           life history traits and environmental conditions demon-                                   J.C., G E R VA S I , S.S. & K AT S , L.B. () The complexity of amphibian
           strate how a management strategy focused on multiple,                                     population declines: understanding the role of cofactors in driving
           diverse threats is a necessary precursor to any successful                                amphibian losses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, ,
                                                                                                     –.
           conservation action (Sodhi et al., ). This, together
                                                                                                  B R A U N I S C H , V., C O P P E S , J., A R L E T T A Z , R., S U C H A N T , R., S C H M I D , H.
           with adequate monitoring (e.g. Courtois et al., ), con-                               & B O L L M A N N , K. () Selecting from correlated climate variables:
           stitutes a basis for appropriate management decisions to                                  a major source of uncertainty for predicting species distributions
           conserve P. longinasus.                                                                   under climate change. Ecography, , –.

           Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
124         M. E. Cobos and R. Alonso Bosch

             B R O O K , B.W., S O D H I , N.S. & B R A D S H AW , C.J.A. () Synergies                         H I J M A N S , R.J., C A M E R O N , S.E., P A R R A , J.L., J O N E S , P.G. & J A R V I S , A.
                 among extinction drivers under global change. Trends in Ecology &                                      () Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for
                 Evolution, , –.                                                                                global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, ,
             B R U M , F.T., G O N Ç A LV E S , L.O., C A P P E L A T T I , L., C A R L U C C I , M.B.,                 –.
                 D E B A S T I A N I , V.J., S A L E N G U E , E.V. et al. () Land use explains                H O F , C., A R A Ú J O , M.B., J E T Z , W. & R A H B E K , C. () Additive threats
                 the distribution of threatened New World amphibians better than                                        from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian
                 climate. PLoS ONE, (), e.                                                                       diversity. Nature, , –.
             C A R E Y , C. & A L E X A N D E R , M.A. () Climate change and amphibian                         IPCC (I N T E R G O V E R N M E N TA L P A N E L O N C L I M AT E C H A N G E ) ()
                 declines: is there a link? Diversity and Distributions, , –.                                    Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change : The Physical
             CITMA (M I N I S T E R I O D E C I E N C I A , T E C N O LO G Í A Y M E D I O                              Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
                 A M B I E N T E ) () V Informe nacional al Convenio sobre la                                       Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
                 Diversidad Biológica. República de Cuba, La Habana, Cuba.                                              Change (eds T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.
             CNAP (C E N T R O N AC I O N A L D E Á R E A S P R O T E G I D A S ) () Plan del                       K. Allen, J. Boschung et al.), pp. –. Cambridge University Press,
                 Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas –. Ministerio de                                          Cambridge, UK, and New York, USA.
                 Ciencias Tecnología y Medio Ambiente, La Habana, Cuba.                                            IUCN () The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. .. Http://
             C O U R T O I S , E.A., M I C H E L , E., M A R T I N E Z , Q., P I N E A U , K., D E W Y N T E R ,        www.iucnredlist.org [accessed  December ].
                 M., F I C E T O L A , G.F. & F O U Q U E T , A. () Taking the lead on                         L I , Y., C O H E N , J.M. & R O H R , J.R. () Review and synthesis of
                 climate change: modelling and monitoring the fate of an Amazonian                                      the effects of climate change on amphibians. Integrative Zoology, ,
                 frog. Oryx, , –.                                                                               –.
             C U S H M A N , S.A. () Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on                              L I P S , K.R., D I F F E N D O R F E R , J., M E N D E L S O N , III, J.R. & S E A R S , M.W.
                 amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation, ,                                     () Riding the wave: reconciling the roles of disease and climate
                 –.                                                                                               change in amphibian declines. PLoS Biology, (), e.
             D AW S O N , T.P., J AC K S O N , S. T., H O U S E , J.I., P R E N T I C E , I.C. & M A C E ,         M A N T Y K A -P R I N G L E , C.S., M A R T I N , T.G. & R H O D E S , J.R. ()
                 G.M. () Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a                                         Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity:
                 changing climate. Science, , –.                                                                 a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, ,
             D Í A Z , L.M. & C Á D I Z , A. () Pflege und Vermehrung von Bufo                                      –.
                 longinasus Stejneger, : Ein Beitrag zur Erhaltung dieser Art.                                 M A N T Y K A -P R I N G L E , C.S., M A R T I N , T.G., M O F F AT T , D.B., L I N K E , S. &
                 Aquaristik Fachmagazin & Aquarium heute, , –.                                                    R H O D E S , J.R. () Understanding and predicting the combined
             D Í A Z , L.M. & C Á D I Z , A. () Guía taxonómica de los anfibios de                                  effects of climate change and land‐use change on freshwater
                 Cuba. Abc Taxa, , –.                                                                              macroinvertebrates and fish. Journal of Applied Ecology, , –.
             D Í A Z , L.M., C Á D I Z , A., C H O N G , A. & S I LVA , A. () First report of                  M AT E O , J. & A C E V E D O , M. () Regionalización físico–geográfica.
                 chytridiomycosis in a dying toad (Anura: Bufonidae) from Cuba: a                                       In Nuevo Atlas Nacional de Cuba (eds G. Oliva, E. Lluís &
                 new conservation challenge for the island. EcoHealth, , –.                                      E.A. Sánchez), p. XII... Instituto Geográfico Nacional de España,
             D R E W , A., A L L E N , E.J. & A L L E N , L.J.S. () Analysis of climatic and                        Madrid, Spain.
                 geographic factors affecting the presence of chytridiomycosis in                                  M O S S , R., B A B I K E R , M., B R I N K M A N , S., C A LV O , E., C A R T E R , T.,
                 Australia. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, , –.                                                 E D M O N D S , J. et al. () Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of
             E S T R A D A , R., M A R T Í N , G., M A R T Í N E Z , P., V I O E L , S., C A P O T E , R.,              Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies.
                 R E Y E S , I. et al. () Mapa (BD-SIG) de vegetación natural y                                     Technical summary. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
                 seminatural de Cuba v. sobre Landsat etm  slc-off gap filled, circa                                  Geneva, Switzerland.
                 . Memorias del IV Congreso de Manejo de Ecosistemas y                                         N O R I , J., L E M E S , P., U R B I N A -C A R D O N A , N., B A L D O , D., L E S C A N O , J. &
                 Biodiversidad. La Habana, Cuba.                                                                        L OY O L A , R. () Amphibian conservation, land-use changes
             F I S H E R , M.C. & G A R N E R , T.W.J. () The relationship between the                              and protected areas: a global overview. Biological Conservation, ,
                 emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the international                                         –.
                 trade in amphibians and introduced amphibian species. Fungal                                      P E T E R S O N , A.T., P A P E S , M. & E AT O N , M. () Transferability and
                 Biology Reviews, , –.                                                                              model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of
             F O N G , A., D Á V I L A , N.V. & L Ó P E Z -I B O R R A , G.M. () Amphibian                          GARP and Maxent. Ecography, , –.
                 hotspots and conservation priorities in eastern Cuba identified by                                P E T E R S O N , A.T., S O B E R Ó N , J., P E A R S O N , R.G., A N D E R S O N , R.P.,
                 species distribution modeling. Biotropica, , –.                                                M A R T Í N E Z -M E Y E R , E., N A K A M U R A , M. & A R A Ú J O , M.B. ()
             F O N S E C A , C.R., B E C K E R , C.G., H A D D A D , C.F.B. & P R A D O , P.I. ()                   Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions. Princeton
                 Response to comment on “Habitat split and the global decline of                                        University Press, Princeton, USA.
                 amphibians”. Science, , .                                                                   P H I L L I P S , S.J., A N D E R S O N , R.P. & S C H A P I R E , R.E. () Maximum
             H A N S E N , M.C., P O TA P OV , P.V., M O O R E , R., H A N C H E R , M.,                                entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological
                 T U R U B A N O VA , S.A., T Y U K AV I N A , A. et al. () High-resolution                         Modelling, , –.
                 global maps of st-century forest cover change. Science, , –.                           P O U N D S , J.A., B U S T A M A N T E , M.R., C O LO M A , L.A., C O N S U E G R A , J.A.,
             H A R V E L L , D., A LT I Z E R , S., C AT TA D O R I , I.M., H A R R I N G T O N , L. &                  F O G D E N , M.P.L., F O S T E R , P.N. et al. () Widespread amphibian
                 W E I L , E. () Climate change and wildlife diseases: when does the                                extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming.
                 host matter the most? Ecology, , –.                                                            Nature, , –.
             HEDGES, S.B. & D Í A Z , L. () Peltophryne longinasus. The IUCN Red                               P Y K E , C.R. () Habitat loss confounds climate change impacts.
                 List of Threatened Species : e.TA. Http://dx.doi.                                     Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, , –.
                 org/./IUCN.UK..RLTS.TA.en [accessed                                      QGIS D E V E LO P M E N T T E A M () QGIS: A Free and Open Source
                 August ].                                                                                          Geographic Information System. Http://qgis.osgeo.org.
             H E N D E R S O N , R.W. & P OW E L L , R. () Natural History of West                             R A D O S AV L J E V I C , A. & A N D E R S O N , R.P. () Making better Maxent
                 Indian Reptiles and Amphibians. University Press of Florida,                                           models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and
                 Gainesville, Florida.                                                                                  evaluation. Journal of Biogeography, , –.

                                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
Threats to an Endangered Cuban toad                          125

           R A X W O R T H Y , C.J., P E A R S O N , R.G., R A B I B I S O A , N.,                         W A R R E N , D.L. & S E I F E R T , S.N. () Ecological niche modeling in
              R A KOT O N D R A Z A F Y , A.M., R A M A N A M A N J AT O , J., R A S E L I M A N A N A ,      Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance
              A.P. et al. () Extinction vulnerability of tropical montane                                 of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications, , –.
              endemism from warming and upslope displacement: a preliminary                                W E L D O N , C., D U P R E E Z , L.H., H Y A T T , A.D., M U L L E R , R. & S P E A R S , R.
              appraisal for the highest massif in Madagascar. Global Change                                   () Origin of the amphibian chytrid fungus. Emerging Infectious
              Biology, , –.                                                                         Diseases, , –.
           R Ö D D E R , D., K I E L G A S T , J. & L Ö T T E R S , S. () Future potential             W I L L I A M S , S.E. & H E R O , J.-M. () Rainforest frogs of the
              distribution of the emerging amphibian chytrid fungus under                                     Australian wet tropics: guild classification and the ecological
              anthropogenic climate change. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, ,                                similarity of declining species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B,
              –.                                                                                        , –.
           R O H R , J.R., R A F F E L , T.R., R O M A N S I C , J.M., M C C A L L U M , H. &              Z A N K , C., B E C K E R , F.G., A B A D I E , M., B A L D O , D., M A N E Y R O , R. &
              H U D S O N , P.J. () Evaluating the links between climate, disease                         B O R G E S -M A R T I N S , M. () Climate change and the distribution of
              spread, and amphibian declines. Proceedings of the National                                     Neotropical red-bellied toads (Melanophryniscus, Anura, Amphibia):
              Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, , –                                how to prioritize species and populations? PLoS ONE, (), e.
              .
           S O D H I , N.S., B I C K F O R D , D., D I E S M O S , A.C., L E E , T.M., K O H , L.P.,
              B R O O K , B.W. et al. () Measuring the meltdown: drivers of                            Biographical sketches
              global amphibian extinction and decline. PLoS ONE, (), e.
           V A L D É S D E L A O S A , A. & R U I Z G A R C Í A , F. () Consideraciones                MA R L O N E. CO B O S ’ research interests are focused on the biogeog-
              sistemáticas sobre Bufo longinasus (Anura: Bufonidae) y descripción                          raphy, ecology and conservation of tropical fauna, particularly amphi-
              de una nueva subespecie. Poeyana, , –.                                                 bians. RO B E R T O AL O N S O BO S C H ’ s research interests are focused on
           W A LT H E R , G.R., P O S T , E., C O N V E Y , P., M E N Z E L , A., P A R M E S A N , C.,    the natural history, behaviour, evolution and conservation of
              B E E B E E , T.J.C. et al. () Ecological responses to recent climate                    Caribbean amphibians and reptiles, with special emphasis on the en-
              change. Nature, , –.                                                                demic toads of Cuba.

           Oryx, 2018, 52(1), 116–125 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000612
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 27 Jan 2021 at 01:42:10, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000612
You can also read