Qualifications and disqualifications for membership of Legislative Assembly
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Qualifications and disqualifications for membership of Legislative Assembly 1
Any person aspiring to be Member of State Legislature, whether by election or by nomination, must be qualified and must not be disqualified under the Constitution or under any law for such membership. Crucial date for determining whether a candidate is qualified or disqualified is not the date of filing nomination paper but the date fixed for the scrutiny of nominations. 2
Constitutional Qualifications (Article 173 of the Constitution) Citizenship of India. Oath or affirmation to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution. Minimum qualifying age. Any other qualification prescribed by Parliament. 3
Oath or Affirmation under the Constitution of India [Article 173 (a)] Every candidate has to make and subscribe either an oath in the name of God or a solemn affirmation in the form prescribed for the purpose in the Third Schedule to the Constitution. The purpose of this oath or affirmation is that the person undertakes to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution and uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India. 4
Persons before whom oath or affirmation to be made : Returning Officer or any of the Assistant Returning Officers of the constituency. All stipendiary Magistrates of the first class, District Judges and persons belonging to judicial service of the State. Superintendent of the prison if the candidate is confined in a prison. Commandant of the detention camp if under preventive detention. Medical Superintendent/Medical Practitioner in case candidate is confined to bed. Diplomatic or Consular Representative of India in the country, if the candidate is out of India. Any other person nominated by the Election Commission, on application made to it. 5
Oath or Affirmation – when to be made : Oath or affirmation must be made after the nomination paper has been submitted to RO. It must be made before the commencement of the date of scrutiny of nominations, i.e., latest by mid-night of the date preceding the date of scrutiny. 6
Oath or affirmation by a candidate contesting election from more than one constituency : Making and subscribing of requisite oath or affirmation in one constituency is sufficient; Separate Oath or affirmation required if contesting elections both to the House of the People and to a State Legislative Assembly at a simultaneous election. 7
Age qualification [Article 173(b)] A person shall not be qualified to be chosen to fill a seat in the State Legislative Assembly, unless he is of 25 years of age. Age qualification should be fulfilled by the candidate on the date fixed for the scrutiny of nominations [section 36 (2) (a) of 1951-Act]. 8
Statutory qualifications [Article 173(c)] Qualifications for election to a State Legislative Assembly (s 5) : In the case of the constituencies reserved for SCs or STs, the candidate should be a member of any of those castes or tribes, and an elector for any Assembly Constituency in the State; In the case of any other constituency in the State, candidate should be an elector for any Assembly Constituency in that State. 9
Constitutional Disqualifications [Article 191(1)] Holding Office of profit under the Govt of India or Govt of any State, other than an office exempted under law. Unsoundness of mind, Un-discharged insolvent. Non-citizenship of India or acknowledgement of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State. Any other disqualification prescribed by Parliament. 10
Office of profit under the Government [Article 191(1)(a)]: All questions whether a particular person is holding an office of profit under the government or not have to be decided by applying the following tests to the facts and circumstances of each case in the light of Supreme Court decision in Shivamurthy Swami Inamdar Vs. Agadi Sanganna Andanappa [(1971) 3 SCC 870] :- Whether the government makes the appointment; Whether the government has the right to remove or dismiss the holder; 11
contd…. Whether any remuneration is paid; Does the government exercise any control over the performance of those functions. However, all State Legislatures have passed Acts removing disqualification in respect of certain offices mentioned therein under Art 191(1)(a). Please refer to Bihar Legislature(Removal of Disqualifications) Act, 1950, as amended from time to time. 12
Some other relevant judgments In Satrucharla Chandrasekhar Raju v Vyricherla Pradeep Kumar Dev (AIR 1992 SC 1959) it was held that power of Govt to appoint a person to the office or power to revoke the appointment at its discretion is a test to decide if the office is an office under the Govt for this purpose. 13
More judgments In Shibu Soren v Dayanand Sahay (AIR 2001 SC 2583), Supreme Court held, on the point of „profit‟ that „profit‟ connotes pecuniary gain. If there is some pecuniary gainreceivable by the person other than „compensation‟ to defray out-of-pocket expenses (TA,DA, etc), that amounts to „profit‟. 14
Judgments…. In Bhagwati Prashad Dixit Ghorewala vs Rajiv Gandhi (AIR 1986 SC 1534) it was held that Members of Parliament and State Legislatures are not holding office of profit as they are elected as Members and not appointed by Government. 15
Office under loacal authority In Guru Govinda Basu vs Shankari Prasad Ghosal (AIR 1964 SC 254), Supreme Court held that only holders of OOP under the Central or State Govt are disqualified. Holders of office under local authority are NOT disqualified under the Constitution for being chosen as members of Parliament or State Legislature. 16
Unsoundness of mind [Article 191 (1) (b)]: A person is disqualified if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court. Mere allegation not sufficient – such person should be so declared by a competent court under the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. 17
Un-discharged insolvent [Article 191 (1) (c)]: A person adjudged insolvent by a competent insolvency court under the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 and has not been discharged from insolvency under the provision of that Act, is disqualified for contesting an election to State Legislature. Mere commission of acts of insolvency not a ground for disqualification. In Thampanoor Ravi vs Charupara Ravi (AIR 1999 SC 3309) Supreme Court held that disqualification is incurred only when a competent Insolvency Court declares a person „insolvent‟. 18
Non-citizenship of India or acknowledgement of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State [Article 191 (1) (d)]: Citizenship of India a fundamental and essential qualification – additionally a person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and also for being a Member of State Legislature if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State or is under any acknowledgement of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State. 19
Statutory disqualifications [Article 191 (1) (e)] Parliament empowered to make statutory laws prescribing disqualifications for membership for both Parliament and State Legislatures : – Disqualifications so prescribed by Parliament under Representation of the People Act, 1951 are : Disqualification on conviction for certain offences (Section 8). Disqualification on ground of commission of corrupt practices (Section 8A). 20
Disqualification for dismissal from govt. service for corruption or disloyalty (Section 9). Disqualification for contract with “appropriate government” (Section 9A). Disqualification for holding office under government company (Section 10). Disqualification for failure to lodge account of election expenses (Section 10A). 21
Disqualification on conviction for certain offences (s 8) Offences inviting disqualification on conviction specified in three categories mentioned in sub- sections (1) to (3). Conviction by Trial Court attracts disqualification; Release on bail does not remove disqualification, unless conviction is also stayed during pendency of appeal; Disqualfication arises only on conviction and not at any prior stage. 22
Sectio 8… For offences listed in sub-section (1), mere conviction leads to disqualification, even if there is no sentence of imprisonment. For the tree offences listed in sub-section (2), disqualification arises only in cases of conviction and sentence of imprisonment for a minimum period of six months. For other offences, conviction with2 years‟ sentence leads to disqualification. 23
Period of disqualification u/s 8 Period of disqualification is 6 years from the date of conviction. In the event of imprisonment, period would be the entire period of imprisonment and a further period of six years after release from jail. After expiry of the above period, the disqualification of ends. 24
Disqualification on account of corrupt practices(s 8A) Disqualification u/s 8A for corrupt practices arises only on an order passed by the President on the opinion tendered by the Commission. If there is any such case, the name(s) will be circulayted from ECI. Only those persons are disqualified whose list is circulated by ECI from time to time. 25
Disqualification for dismissal from government service for corruption or disloyalty (s 9) A candidate dismissed from government service within the last five years must produce a certificate from ECI that he was not dismissed for corruption or disloyalty; Such certificate must be filed with the nomination paper, otherwise nomination shall be rejected [Section 33(3)]. 26
Disqualification for contract with appropriate government (s 9A) Contract should be subsisting on the date of scrutiny of nominations; Contract should be with „appropriate government‟; „Appropriate government‟ means Central Government in the case of election to Parliament, and State Government in the case of election to State Legislature; Contract should be either for supply of goods or for execution of works. 27
Disqualification for holding office under government company (s 10) Only Secretary, Manager or Managing Agent of government company is disqualified; „Government company‟ means any company, corporation, etc., in which appropriate government has not less than 25% share; „Appropriate Government‟ has same meaning as explained above in the case of contract with government. 28
Disqualification for failure to lodge account of election expenses (s 10A) Only those persons are disqualified whose list is circulated by ECI from time to time. Disqualification U/s 10A is for specific period of 3 years. Pl. go through the list of disqualified persons in respect of your State carefully. 29
Thanks K.F. Wilfred 30
You can also read